He did do the hard work of recording from an HD VHS. That's like quoting someone saying an original interpretation of an aphorism without thanking the person that interpreted it that way.
@@vilheard3030 Because there were still a lot of cool kitschy shops and restaurants that weren't overly expensive because they hadn't been priced out of the city yet. This was before NYC became a Londongrad of sorts - a place for dictators and other plutocrats to park offshore money in real estate. Don't get me wrong, there were spendy apartments and brownstones, but you could make a decent wage and still survive - especially if you pooled iwth others in a multi-bedroom apartment. The city was starting to shake the crime of the 1970s and 1980s, and the subways were also rideable.
You can see the focus and concentration on the people faces. No one knows what each other is thinking about because they’re not sharing it with the world.
I was only 6 years old this year but '93 was pretty cool. I still remember watching those kids shows like Batman TAS, Uncanny X-Men, and Masked Rider Black. Good times.
Nowadays that glance is sexual harassment and you will be shouted down and shamed by the #metoo movement for doing so! Then required to get counseling, pay restitution, forfeit your career and apologize ad infinitum.
"Offers a look at New York in a way no one has ever seen"...well, unless you lived in New York in 1993... Also, HD-VHS did become a thing, as D-VHS, or D-Theatre, but it was short lived, it was in the market for only 2-3 years.
Nope, D-VHS was around much longer than that. In 2002 they actually started releasing pre-recorded 1080i movies on D-VHS, and it lasted for a few years beyond this.
Lol, if you look closely, he didn't even look at her when they were walking towards each other and didn't see her face!) He only looked at her from behind once more, so he couldn't know what she looked like.
@@iohannarchsky8042 His back it to the camera. How could you possibly know where his eyes were looking before turning around? He definitely saw her before turning around.
@@iohannarchsky8042 Lol, aren't you able to move your eyes? At least I can point my face and eyes to different directions. So please explain again how he isn't able to see her face at 0:36 - 0:37.
Yes and back when men could approach women and ask women out without the fear of being accused of being creepy and being a predator and without the fear of having false accusations made against them.
What’s creepy about this video is there were less cameras back then. Now there are more you never know who is watching and if your face is out there on some obscure social media vid.
@@SidVacant69 forming an informed opinion often requires watching or experiencing something firsthand. However, I stopped watching when I realised how unusual the content was.
No one has ever seen? I'm sure there other photos and videos of the exact same locations. It's from 1993 not 1793 stop making out that it's so far in the past.
What hasn't changed - the open-ended focus on a man checking out a woman, and according him no privacy (the sneaky attempt at appearing neutral, while actually eliciting outrage at this). Even back then - women "don't" check out men at all! What has changed - this has become worse, thanks to wokeness.
The attractive girl getting checkout by ponytail man was annoyed due to the unwanted attention she always received. Fast forward 30 years later, she is now in her 50's or 60's and no one, except for her loved ones and friends, even notices her. She longs for the past when she was young and beautiful, as she wished she would have appreciated those days so much more.
Hi there, this is fab! I was wondering if I could borrow a 10 Second clip from this video? - it has the aesthetic I'm going for on my social media for a small business I'm trying to start.
@@derwamper1258 you have to compare Apples to Apples. I was referring to the link in the comment. And the only person who's an idiot would be someone calling someone they don't know an idiot. So don't be that way. Cheers.
HD isn't that impressive as everyone would like to believe. I had a 4:3 monitor with 1600x1200 resolution, years and years before HD. Which is only a little lower than HD. it's not impressive at all.
What machines or recording equipment was available at that time that even recorded close to 1600x1200 resolution? Its like me having a 8k display in this age.
