HDMI or DisplayPort? 

Royalties on what the electricity running to my tv?

@JacqueBibblequip nope, hdmi is a licensed product. If you want to release a product with this port, you have to pay roughly 10.000$ and than a few pennys for every sold item and guess who gets to pay them in the end? Correct, the Consumer. That is why I said what I said

I ran into a problem with my TiVo because my HDMI cable became slightly loose and since cable card and HDMI are drum protected it wouldn't let me use any of the cable tuners as it couldn't get the drm info from the TV this issue would be solved if HDMI was a locking connector and most of all massive companies weren't as greedy.

HDMI 2.1 is faster than DP 1.4 and that’s what graphics cards currently are limited to

@@ericlikeshalo in what regards is HDMI faster? HDMI 2.1 can only transmit roughly 38GBit/s while DP can transmit double the data [78GBit/s]. Pls Google the specs before you Post something

Actually, DisplayPort has a better refresh rate than HDMI, HDMI is stuck at 144 Hertz for any resolution, your claim of display report being stuck at 60 hertz and is only true if you're using the oldest version of DisplayPort at 4K, and it barely any graphics cards can even run games at 4K above 60 FPS, and if we're talking about raw specs, display port HDMI beat at every point, display port 2.0 transports 80 GB per second, or 16K at 60 Hertz (No graphics starts to run any games at that) HDMI 2.1 can do 48 GB per second or 10K at 120 Hertz

It's not false tho

Both gives same color accuracy results? Or have any difference

@@TSOLYRICS DP supports higher refresh rate and resolution cheaper

@@anandurajendran3864 resolution cheaper?🤔

@@TSOLYRICS yeh if you want like 4k 120hz support you need to pay extra money for a monitor that supports that input using hdmi.

@@anandurajendran3864 oh now i understand, imma trying to buy a 1080p monitor so no need of dp I'll use hdmi

wrong

@@SStonio12 yeahhhhh sorry Sherlock i know there is HDMI 2.1 but only a hand full of TVs Support that. Or in other words 95% or more of TVs in use out there don't have HDMI 2.1 Support.

@@JahweChanan u dont need hdmi 2.1 to get more than 60hz

@@JahweChanan hdmi 2.0 can support up to 1080p 240hz / 1440p 144hz / 4k 60hz

@@SStonio12 yeah 2.1, 2.0 doesn't matter. my point is that almost nobody has a compatible tv out there and also its hard to tell the 2.0 and normal HDMI cable apart. That's why i think generally speaking you still can say that HDMI is for max. 60 and DisplayPort for everything above. Especially when it comes to PC's

2060 pc much better, but if u have Snapchat, i Can help u find a much better pc for not so much money

@@Spazz.nossazhow

@@quinn2501overblik a bit, School work, just better🙀

Gone gone // thank you

It’s the second part of the song (thank you)

How and why?

😢

Is something wrong with it?

​@TechLionOG it's too flat. 2009 ahh cut

So you enjoy thowing money away? Fair enough.

why

@@bugsam bro it’s 1080 it’s cheap

@@jusus222 because money and hdmi 2.1

@@XXently clearly not considering you cant afford a dp