I love how modern scientists always call any new information and theories that challenge their current knowledge "pseudoscience"...until they are proven correct, the same way theirs were decades ago.
Gibberish is no new information. The root of 2 is no rational number. 1x1 = not 2. If you would have a basic knowledge of math you would see this is nonsense. Scientist like new information, they use reviews to test the new axioma. If it makes sense it will be integrated in our knowledge. Terrance promised to cure cancer 10 years ago. He did not. He promised a new source of energy. He did not. He is lying about his education. It is a fraud.
I proved to a math professor that 1 is equal to 0. He failed me, so I dropped his class and then left college. I spent 30 years developing my theory. What I discovered terrified me.
There is a popular belief that in Nazi Germany, Joseph Goebbels, Minister of Propaganda, ordered tuning forks to be replaced to 440 hz. Before then, instruments were tuned at 432 hz. A decrease of blood pressure values, a decrease of the heart rate, and a decrease of the respiratory rate was the result of 432 hz tuned music. People were more focused on listening and more satisfied. Goebbels surmised that 440 hz would increase these rates, which contributed to a decrease in focus, an increase in becoming tired and apathetic.
Another myth, Nazi's were not geniuses, most if not all of them were butchers at heart, only the top officials were anywhere near high IQ level, absolutely do NOT believe any word this guy says
Nothing is new, Majority of these things have been discovered by yogis thousands of years back. There's a reason chanting mantras and bells in the temple is used by Indians. Just by going little deep in vedas will start giving answers people are searching outwards yet.
Yep. Multiplication and math in general is objective truth and very literal. Terrence is simply wrong. I’m quite shocked over how many people actually believe he’s the new Einstein. Well…he’s not(he’s probably closer to Homer Simpson)
I think it depends on how you define what 1 is...if you there are 2 humans in a room you would use the plural humans to define what they are so its not the number itself its what the 1 is indicative of which can represent a part or whole of something... don't ask me how i came to thos conclusion lol...so metaphysically thinking if 1 x 1 are both indicative of thr same thing then you will get more of the same in quality not quantity
You got that conclusion bcuz it's true. Numbers are simply ciphers/symbols to indicate a value. Like the number 5 isn't real because 5 is made up of individual units Of 1. And he's saying that the very principle of multiplication is to increase ad there's no such thing as 0.
I honor him for coming forward and actually explaining what is already known but has been hidden from common knowledge. What i have observed, is when so called common people start to touch on the same knowledge themselves and recognise what is happening, it seems to always end up coming from someone who is already a known figure keeping the power within the very people who has been in it and hiding it. If one comes forward with already known knowledge, the only right and true thing would be to give credit to source and not re-package it as a new thing.
People need to 🤔 think critically more often... All actors are very self centered, so why would they risk their lives to tell us something significant when WE are the suckers that paid our money to see them act in those garbage bins they call movies... PATHETIC!
In terms of sacred "verse" 2 is the one foundation of all understanding. Yet not without 1/2 In verse the greater extent of all possible understanding is through what we perceive to be materially "less" "origin" of this re-flective reality is not material. This realoity likened unto the mirrors face. If you write one on an index card and hold it up to a mirror this is the material illustration re-verse re-flective of what is real. This reality is like unto the mirror.
time, times, 1/2 Time. 125 in relation to 6 days 123 in relation to seven 124 Yet all offerings are measured in whole terms. 1/2 is 5 1,2,3 is 6 yet also 123 a difference of 117 , 123 has six total permutations for understanding. Every way in which it can be seen wholy halving importance
This man does not know basic physics, do NOT share this video, in fact, you should report this video for it's lies and its complete lack of factual information
He is just parroting others. And when he proposes his own ideas it's a laughter fest. 1×1=2 muahahahahaha. Also look up his patents - he "invented" jewelry. Die laughing. No wonder his patents have been denied. I just read his thesis in pdf and it comes accross as drug-induced rantings. His admitted involvement in psychedelics reinforces the suspicion.
