important tidbit of information : If you can't solve a problem, find the solution, add it to your strategy, rinse and repeat until you find so many different approaches that you can simply solve everything (about that one problem probably)
@@Devansh_Saini365 aap log ye batao Preparation start kr dia !?? If yes then ?kon se platform se padh rhe ?? Aap kon si country se hai ?? Aapne abhi tak kitna padh rakha ?? Konsi book ?kerte ho ? Itna Jan ne ke baad me batata hu aapko ab kya karna Thanks !!😀😀😄😄
Fun fact: Chinese team at least get 4 golds in every IMO yet most gold a participant from Chinese has achieved is 2. This is because they dont get multiple years to join this event. If they do, all those name in hall of fame will be full of chinese names.
But isn't there 20 age limit. Most of them are 19 year olds how can they compete again ,seems like they focus on 100% and not to mention university student can't compete too
Isn't it also because they choose those with the highest chance to score a perfect ? So unless one is an absolute machine, China is so huge there's always someone younger, more hungry, better.
I know absolutely nothing about mathematics, legit don't even get what he's talking about. Best thing I can do is calculate nuclear decay but that's about as far as it'll go.
people like him makes me realise I'm not meant for engineering and maths. But I'm not chad enough to do sales or marketing. Maybe biology could be a good option? idk
I've never been in any olympiads or anything, but what I do is I just play around with a system, and by doing that, a lot of the time questions arise naturally. I would probably do that for general problems, but of course also the Art of Problem Solving is nice for preparation
No idea why the obsession with idolizing people who literally only seem to be good at sitting IMO exams These individuals do literally nothing to advance mathematics in any meaningful way and instead just treat it as some kind of trivial exercise in self-indulgent eristics. The Greeks would be appalled.
I suggest you read a paper by Gaule and Agarwal that goes over this exact topic, establishing correlation between IMO scores and future contributions to mathematics. To quote one of the remarks, "Strong performers at the IMO have a disproportionate ability to produce frontier mathematical knowledge compared to PhD graduates and even PhD graduates from elite schools".
It certainly feels wrong to idolize these KIDS. There is no association between sitting in exams and your mathematical expertise. People might spite you with evidences of success of these people. However, the mathematics is not the inherent reason for their success. It's their own cultivated ability in heuristic arts of niche maths. These exams are attempts to nurture the virtue of cultivated abilities, that is acquired through years of hardwork. Those abilities are useful in any field of studies they might pursue. It doesn't even necessarily need to be mathematical. What Greek would find appalling is the civilizations that were sprouted from them are not performing in those virtues.
