(Hearthstone) Treespeaker Calls the Ancients 

1/3 of the deck is epics tho

Token Druid has been a thing for quite some time. The lists usually don't run any legendaries besides DK or Cenarius, which are okay to cut if you're low on budget. Most lists usually requires 6000ish amount of dust, coupled with 52.19% winrate, it's quite a deal for a ladder climbing deck. P.S. still can't beat Odd Paladin though, which requires the same amount of dust but have whopping 59.42% winrate

Shh, I make this, don't tell him

I've won against odd paladin using priest with lots of board clears like duskbreaker and holy nova combined with mass dispel and mass hysteria is good against it.

@@christianlawrence7287 What are you on about? Odd Paladin and Token Druid have pretty close winrates vs eachother, this deck is not beat by Odd Paladin at all.

I speak to the trees... They say nerf odd paladin.

@@Nixilikus wish granted...

Argenti wow I fucking called it didn't I lol

Dagen O'Neill the truth has been discovered

Anyone playing a combo deck deserves every misfortune wilts playing

That would be busted. Basically even if you did clear their board of 5/5’s then they drop two mulch munchers for free and some other shit?

They should make treant a type of minion like dragons or mechs, rather than just having treant minions

The biggest problem with Treespeaker is that it TRANSFORMS the treants, making it somewhat anti-support for the deck. The card should've gotten a Poison Seeds-esque effect, such as "Destroy all your treants and replace them with 5/5 ancients."

@@devinthorn8182 umm what? Treant already had so much refill that it doesn't even matter man. You clear the treant and next turn the druid can easily replace it. It like odd pala but its druid.

The treant deck is shaping up to be amongst the best decks as is. You want to make them even more busted by giving them essentially a 0 mana 8/8 with rush unconditionally? Seems smart.

the most popular token druid that uses treants is currently at 56.3% winrate, but the old version has a 59% winrate. neither of them have a ton of data on them though, with the original list having 15000 games recorded and the treant version 8400 games played.

@@ryukaganzeroful I do have access to those statistics. I've been trying the old version with great success, but Kripp was saying that the new version is significantly stronger, so I was looking for someone with personal experience of like 30 games with each who could tell me...

Probably because they'll drop the archetype. HS is too simple for things that make sense.

i bet they will eventually. they need to spread out all of their archtypes and card drops so they have consistent content to release to keep players interested

Just like how Even warlocks ALWAYS have Giants and twilight Drakes in the firsts turns and never at like turn 10, or how odd paladin, having only 6 1 drops, always gets those in the first turns

but i mean....if you have 2 of any cards the odds of you drawing them on 10 mana which for druid with branching path and stuff prob draw like 15 cards already including the opening hand, the odds for at least one UI is prob around 60~70%?

It transform so it doesnt die

Look at the final decklist, remove Mulch and replace both of them with Malfurion and Cenarius. Done.

Just a question, but what's wrong with Bomb Toss?

It's really not a good card - the 'deal 2 damage' part is the only relevant ability of the card, and it costs 1 mana more than the default, Arcane Shot (deal 2 damage), which costs 1 mana. The 0/2 body that you get in return for paying one more mana is useless, because it has no attack, no taunt, etcetera. Experience with Deathrattle hunter has shown that it's really not worth the hassle to then play deathrattle activators to deal just 2 damage to the enemy hero. Instead, you want deathrattles to build a real threatening presence, like summoning a 5/5 with a 0/3 egg.

@@Leander_ Bomb Toss summons a mech, which means synergies with mechs with magnetic, like Venomancer or the 1/5 with taunt.

Sure, but none of those cards are getting played, so it effectively synergizes with nothing. In ranked, both of those magnetic 'buffs' are just not impactful enough.

George Popov malfurion yes, but mulchmuncher can be more flexible in that you can play it pretty early if you get treaty’s down

Branching Paths is a better choice than any of these cards IMO, and Dendrologist doesn't seem that good either.

I think mulchmuncher is better where you expect to face problematic taunts so that you can open up your win condition easier. For a similar reason that you'd play Crushing Hand instead of Cauldron Elemental in an elemental Shaman deck.

@@drewpeacock9087 Categoricly, I just saw that he isn't using Mulchmuncher really well. Branching Paths is incredible and it should be in any token deck.

@@user-bc4dt8jd6i To be fair that was a sample size of two games. One can't 'categorically' tell much about how Kibler uses his deck synergies from just two games.

Oletram Ekaf no it is not a recent video.

Did you... forget the name of your channel?

Corentin Dorgueil he changed it

@@xhantTheFirst Heh.. I'll always be a kripperino

@@FacterinoCommenterino now there’s no point to saying “first” though

Don't count? They never did count.

It would have been quest Paly if he didn’t play it as often as he did before the exp hit

Maybe he is just trying new stuff? At least he isn't like most other streamers grinding kingsbane rogue or secret/spell hunter every game...

But this is literally the first time he plays this deck