The courtroom thermostat must have been turned up because I didn't hear anything particular "heated" during this exchange. "Dopey Cross Examination" might have been a better title, given the lawyer's "didn't drop dead" question.
I believe she was pointing out the differences in outcome between the two incidents. He also said Mr Floyd was incoherent, this from a man who has obvious hearing difficulties.
He contradicted himself by saying he pulled his gun because he wouldnt show his hands even though he stated he grabbed his hands and put them on the dash after putting them in the air.
Did you watch the footage of the arrest? The attorney created a narrative by only asking specific questions in order to paint a picture that didn’t happen. That’s why you’re confused.
You must not have watched the trial. There were constant issues with audio due to all these social distancing and plastic barriers. It was an issue with alot of people. There were various times where the judge and attorneys had to ask people to speak up.
This is a PERFECT example for anyone that wonders how when end up dead for a simple traffic stop! You got 2-3 people yelling 3-4 different things and they shoot you when you don’t comply... 🤔
He didn't need a hearing aid. It's just one of the oldest ploys to give yourself more time to come up with a BS answer. When someone lies and then is questioned they use this "I can't hear" trope to try and remember what lie they told. Also, when someone starts looking to the left or up at the ceiling like he was also doing, it's a sign that the person is most likely lying. It's a body sign that the brain is trying to work hard at remembering a lie.
You must not have watched the trial. There were constant issues with audio due to all these social distancing and plastic barriers. It was an issue with alot of people. There were various times where the judge and attorneys had to ask people to speak up. So funny how many of you guys in the comments got caught up by your own misunderstanding of the limited perspective you have in this trial. You see a few minutes and then make these ignorant conclusions.
I did! The witness was trying to interject that George Floyd was incoherent and mumbling; the bodycam footage shows the police escalated the situation and George was cooperating but the cops issued confusing instructions which this officer perceived as his non cooperation.
The tactic is to confused the person. One officer say put your hand on the dash, another officer say put ur hands on your head. Now, which officer's command do u comply to? Confusing! Two officers yelling 2 different commands. The result: he or she different listen to me. Didn't listen to which me? He or she doing 2 or 3 different commands. As for Mr. FLYOD, dash to head. Now we have resisting. It's a trap!!!
Common sense person states a command to the nearest officer “I will only obey your command. Tell all other officers to remain silent!” Repeat if necessary. Officers aren’t perfect and need to be respectfully directed to do correct procedures with no confusion.
@@michaellovett8773 yep, they're definitely not perfect. Also, some are just monsters. Had there not have been a citizen filming the whole thing, what do you think would've happened? Not a rhetorical question..
Wait.. One officer says "put your hands on your head" and the other officer says "put your hands on the dashboard" He did both and they wanted to tase him for that, while having their guns drawn? I'm not an American, don't live in the US and I'm certainly not a law enforcement expert... But I can't imagine, that this is common practice in the US and following protocol. Floyd's only option in this case, is to don't follow one of the orders and then gets "punished" for it. Or am I missing something obvious?
Let's get this straight. In 2019 Mr Floyd was a passenger in the car the driver is the one in change so any traffic offence is down to the driver. Why then pick on the passenger. Nex the 2020 when Mr Floyd was killed. The chief of police said it was not an arresable crime but the police decided to escalate the situation in the end killing Mr Floyd. The judge allowed the 2019 Mr Floyd was pulled out of the car. Please can someone explain to me what was Mr Floyd crime in 2019. Being a passenger in the car. Now the judge decided not to to allow Derek Chauvin 19 pass bad beaviour when he was the one on trial. God help America
@@maiziekb he obviously killed himself. Cop had nothing to do with it. Absolutely nothing. Another police officer a victim from these scumbags that are treated to well by police
It's funny that this lady has to ask the police officer how coherent the supposed murder victim was I mean this guy has a track record of being a complete nuisance to society
This was not heated, at all. You might want to try and have a bit of credibility on covering this one. People really aren't in the mood, Law & Crime Network.
@@balcon983 The prosecution doesn't poke holes in the defense, the defense pokes holes in the prosecution. Remember the defense doesn't have to prove anything, the prosecution needs to prove everything beyond any reasonable doubt.
Did he raise his hands ? Yes did he put his hands on the dash yes. Did he obey your command ? Yes. You had your gun pointed at him ? Yes after he didn't raise his hands 🤔
What about the Police Officers that risk their lives every shift that were forced to make very difficult split second decisions that will affect them the rest of their lives?
@@logicalrealist3091 well I wouldn't call Derek Chauvins actions a split second decision...it was more of a cool calm and collected 567seconds that cost a defenceless man his life...so I certainly hope his life changes forever!
@@logicalrealist3091 well I really dont feel I'm assuming anything. The video doesn't lie and it is pretty clear cut from that by itself that the actions of Chauvin was excessive and unjustified. Then there is all the additional evidence for all you naysayers. He didn't die from an overdose and he didn't die from pre existing health conditions. The experts concluded that he died from low oxygen due to police restraint. They are the facts in this case. I am not however going to tar all police officers with the same brush as I know there is so many out there whom are law abiding decent people whom want to protect and serve our communities in the manner that their job entails but these rogue police whom roam the streets on a power trip, whom use their badge as a licence to brutalize, mame and kill have got to go. They have been getting away with it for far to long and they need to be weeded out...FOR ALL OUR SAKES!
I don't know if anyone else picked it up, the female prosecutor asked the witness a question about George Floyd dying in May 2019, she really meant May 2020.
When the prosecutor calls his witnesses it's surely not to agree with the defense attorney the same for the defense attorney is not going to call a witness that would agree with the prosecutor that's only common sense
It's interesting to look back at some of these witnesses. This officer keeps looking at the defense lawyer as to say... What should I say!? 😂 Then he keeps doing the oldest trick in the book when you need a second to come up with an answer that BS of saying can you repeat that, as if all of a sudden he couldn't hear her!
You must not have watched the trial. There were constant issues with audio due to all these social distancing and plastic barriers. It was an issue with alot of people. There were various times where the judge and attorneys had to ask people to speak up.
This is just a horrible situation from all aspects. However, I am always perplexed why no one ever brings up the initial cause that led to this whole incident. Just don’t do suspicious things, especially under the influence. It’s not that hard…just live a normal life and don’t do bad things and you avoid situations like this.
