If he didn't abdicate, they would have killed the kaiser, since I read that there was already a revolution and some guys forced him to abdicate since the people already lost faith in him
Not necessarily. The Crown Prince was ready to march back to Germany to put down the revolt but the Kaiser told him not to because Prince Max basically betrayed the Kaiser and announced his abdication without his permission. This put him in a terrible position and like you say basically forced him to abdicate as he wanted to do what he thought was the best for his country. He put his country first and therefore abdicated the throne to avoid a civil war. With the benefit of hindsight, I think Germany would've likely been better off in the long run had they marched back to Berlin and put the revolt down as there was basically a civil war anyway and the Nazis eventually came to power. @@ChadEmperor1871
Kaisers (if that happend) Wilhelm II (1888-1941) Wilhelm III (1941-1951) Louis Ferdinand I (1951-1994) Fredrich IV (1994-PRESENT) Fascist Germany Wilhelm III (1941-1951) Louis Ferdinand I (1951-1994) Fredrich XIII Prinz Reuss (1994-PRESENT) Absolute Monarchy (Habsburgs) Otto IV (1922-2011) Karl II/VII (2011-PRESENT) Under Union with Romania (And The Government In-Exile) Ferdinand II (1918-1933) Carlos III (1933-1940) Michael I/Mihai I (1940-2017) Carlos IV (2017-PRESENT) House of Bourbon Louis I (1918-1941) Louis II (1941-1951) Louis III (1951-1994) Louis IV (1994-PRESENT) Windsor George I/V (1918-1936) George II/VI (1936-1952) Elizabeth I/II (1952-2022) Charles I/III (2022)
@@BorchikYes actually, the empire wasn’t, absolutely shady, they did some stuff that was bad for the time, but a lot of what they did was just run of the mill, it ain’t personal kinda stuff. Of course nowadays that isn’t how it’s seen, but hey, genocide in the 1900’s isn’t bad when viewing history
Reichsslogan in allen 3 Weltkriegen: 1. Weltkrieg: ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Kaiser ✠ 2. Weltkrieg: ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer 卐 3. Weltkrieg: ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Euro €
I didn't know I needed this but I do the German blood in me and my German ancestors are whispering in my ear telling me to take back alsace-lorraine and East Prussia für das Vaterland
Now that you're Talking about 15% In Fact in Early 1914 the Poverty in the German Empire was About 13%-15% around the Population which was VERY Impressive during that Time.
@@user-hr8dx9qw4n He wasn't Directly Gay tho! Obviously I'm not Denying that He wasn't Far from being Homosexual but Still he wasn't Fully Gay, Also the Holy Roman Empire has More Things to do Austrian Rulership instead of Prussia Itself.
@@hofnarrtheclown Friedrich II was pretty gay , also well documented: + As a young crown prince, he confided to Friedrich Wilhelm von Grumbkow that he felt too little attracted to the female sex to be able to imagine getting married. + He had a relationship with his father's page Peter Karl Christoph von Keith, which is proven by written comments from his sister Wilhelmine, and the father separate the two. + He himself had clear correspondence with various lovers + He expressed his jealousy in writing about a page of his brother Prince Heinrich, who was openly gay + He had a marriage of convenience with his wife Elisabeth Christine. + He had his friend Katte. + He built his Sansouci Palace in Potsdam, where women were only allowed in the women's wing. etc. etc. etc.
@@user-hr8dx9qw4n Agian I didn't Say he Wasn't Gay at All but Only not Fully Gay because Do you Really think a Fully Gay Individual would Able to do Such Incredible Things like what He Did?
