Тёмный

Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle EXPLAINED (for beginners) 

Parth G
Подписаться 238 тыс.
Просмотров 114 тыс.
50% 1

Uncertain about what Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle means? Worry no more - this video is here to help you :)
Let's start out this description with timestamps, because this video is super looong.
00:00 - Intro
00:42 - What is Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle?
02:33 - Classical vs Quantum worlds, and what "uncertainty" even means
03:54 - A common description of, and misconceptions about the Uncertainty Principle
06:42 - Fourier transforms
12:22 - How Fourier transforms bring about Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
Most commonly, Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle is used to describe a relationship between how much we know about two quantities: position and momentum. The principle tells us that there is a fundamental and universal limit to how much we can simultaneously know about both. In other words, the more confidently we know the position (of, let's say, a particle), the less confident we can be about its momentum. Now the word "uncertainty" just refers to the width of the probability distribution that describes a particle's position or momentum in the quantum world.
Before we find out where the Uncertainty Principle comes from, we will discuss a commonly used description that gets thrown around regarding the Principle. It's known as the Observer Effect, and it's the idea that the light we send into a particle in order to glean information about its position and momentum actually ends up changing the behaviour of the particle. High energy, small wavelength light tells us with more certainty the position of the particle, but changes its momentum by a lot so we are less certain about this. Low energy, large wavelength light doesn't give us much information about the position of the particle but does tell us more about its momentum. Annoyingly though, the observer effect is NOT the Uncertainty Principle. It's just a possible explanation for it, as suggested by Heisenberg himself.
So where can we look to find the origins of the Uncertainty Principle? Well a good place to start is to understand Fourier Transforms. Fourier transforms come about by first breaking down mathematical functions into sine wave building blocks - kind of like how we break vectors down into horizontal and vertical components. The sine wave building blocks are sine waves of different frequencies. We can then take the amplitude of each of the sine wave building blocks and plot that against the frequency of that sine wave to give us a new plot. This new plot is known as the Fourier Transform of the original function that we broke down.
The interesting thing to note is that if a function is super wide on its horizontal axis, then its Fourier transform is going to be super narrow, and vice versa. This is useful when we bring the whole thing back round to the Uncertainty Principle.
Now remember, in quantum mechanics we use "wave functions" to describe the probability distributions of position and momentum. But here's the clincher: The momentum wave function is the Fourier transform of the position wave function. This means that if we have a super wide position wave function (so it could be in a larger range of values, and thus we are more uncertain about it), then the momentum wave function is narrow (so it's in a smaller range of values and we are more certain about the momentum) and vice versa. This is where the Principle comes from - the more we know about position, the less we know about momentum, and vice versa once again.
Thank you so much for watching, if you liked the video then please subscribe!
Follow me on Instagram: @parthvlogs

Опубликовано:

 

1 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 446   
@MrPrimioNILOS
@MrPrimioNILOS 4 года назад
I am a physics teacher, I can not make it that easy. Great job. Thank you
@nikis7742
@nikis7742 2 года назад
Sir you have not questioned anything of basic principles of physics that's reason you can't break it start questioning everything of physics theory you would know that physics what is being taught is bunch of lies and deceit hope you would not offended by my opinion 🙏🙏🙏
@docta2985
@docta2985 Год назад
This is the most comment
@DagonFF
@DagonFF Год назад
​@@nikis7742nobody in the world understands quantum mechanics in very simple everyday terms. The whole theory is a mathematical construct, we have no clue of its deep meaning. So I wouldn't say the teacher understands less compared to the guy in the video.
@robblerouser5657
@robblerouser5657 4 года назад
This was a better explanation than any other I've ever heard anywhere.
@phy_dude
@phy_dude 4 года назад
If you're from Science and like a little bit of math , you can check out '3blue1brown' . Amazingly visualized
@joeboxter3635
@joeboxter3635 3 года назад
Yes, but he is talking about the uncertainty of a single quantity. And it's F-transform. But the uncertainty principle is about the product of two things position*momentum. Not position alone, and not momentum alone.
@angelmendez-rivera351
@angelmendez-rivera351 3 года назад
@@joeboxter3635 No, you are wrong. He literally said it in the video: the momentum is the Fourier transform of position. So the uncertainty principle is not talking about "two separate quantities," but rather, it is indeed talking about a quantity and its Fourier transform. In fact, this how conjugate variables are defined.
@Padhaikarbhai
@Padhaikarbhai 3 года назад
@@angelmendez-rivera351 u guys are so genius are u from 12 grade though
@zarinawillows2347
@zarinawillows2347 4 года назад
6:06 I've waited so long for somebody to actually say this. My classmates still think that the Uncertainty Principle is a result of our "Technological Impotence". This video is a good proof I can put forward...... Thanks a ton man.😊😊😊
@LEO-ho5gh
@LEO-ho5gh 2 года назад
Basically Einstein think same
@jatinthakur7887
@jatinthakur7887 2 года назад
i still do think that it because of human's lack of knowledge that we are unable to calculate both precisely
@fourierfoyer365
@fourierfoyer365 Месяц назад
@@jatinthakur7887 I realize this comment is a year old but .. think of a teeter totter. You cannot push both ends down at the same time. You can't blame the people sitting on it.
@KunalSharma-dx8dg
@KunalSharma-dx8dg 5 лет назад
Explained with simplicity. Really good.
@KunalSharma-dx8dg
@KunalSharma-dx8dg 5 лет назад
@@ParthGChannel I just love your work, sir. I need someone to guide​, please share your e-mail id.
@n5817-c
@n5817-c 4 года назад
Great video! In uni, when I realized how "wide in real space" gives "narrow in Fourier space" and how this physically ties to the uncertainty principle - I think that was really when quantum mechanics got REALLY cool. Excellent intuitive explanation. Feynman would be proud.
@rahulsinghbaghel80
@rahulsinghbaghel80 3 года назад
My God. You have clarified, uncertainty principle and Fourier transform in one go!!! The world needs more teachers like you. Thanks for the really simple and lucid explanation.
@paparoach3025
@paparoach3025 3 года назад
I’ve a compute engineering degree so I’m familiar with Fourier Transforms. And I have to say you did a beautiful job describing the simple concept behind them while leaving out the intricacies communicated by the specific mathematics
@randymartin9040
@randymartin9040 9 месяцев назад
You truly have an extravagant gift for explaining things. I actually just yelled out loud WOW after 3:05. Love this channel
@TheFunkoDunko
@TheFunkoDunko 4 года назад
What I've always wondered, is WHY momentum is the Fourier Transform of position, and WHY position is the Fourier Transform of momentum. That part I don't understand, but I'll continue to look for an answer.
@gustavodeoliveira702
@gustavodeoliveira702 4 года назад
Well, maybe in some moment in your life, I don't known, in your school or college, you studied or will study a particular kind of waves, the harmonics waves. They have a perfect sinusoidal shape and are expressed by the following formula: y(x,t)=Acos(kx-ωt) Where A is the Amplitude, k is the wavenumber and ω is angular frequency. But we can rewrite it using some identities: k=2π/λ and ω=2πf, where λ is the waveleght and f is the frequency. So y(x,t)=Acos(2π(x/λ-ft) If you notice, there is an special relation in this equation beetwen time (t) e frequency (f), they are being multiplied. Ideed, time and frequency are conjugate varibles when we are dealing with processing signs transported by electromagnetic waves. Is a consequence of the mathematic area of Fourier Analyze that when you are measuring the uncertanty of time and frequency, you need to respect an analagous inequality ΔfΔt≥1/4π (The uncertainty principle is: ΔxΔp≥h/4π=ħ/2 where ħ=h/2π) Fantastic, no? So, you must be questioning about the uncertanty principle and why position and momentum are conjugate variables. Well, I will not be able to demonstrate anything, but I can show that the pattern of t and f in the harmonic wave repeat for p and x. How? Quantum mechanics is a kind of undulatory mechanics, and a free particle solution for Schrodinger`s equation can be at leat in it`s real part be represent by the same shape of harmonic waves: Ψ(x,t)=Ψ_0cos(2π(x/λ-ft) But particles in quantum mechanics follow the Broglie's relations, every particle behave like a wave and have a wavelengh, and his relation with momentum is given by: p=h/λ, where h is the Planck's Constant = 6.62607004 × 10-34 m2 kg/s So, if you want, rewriting the solucion of Schrodinger's Equation Ψ(x,t)=Ψ_0cos(2π(px/h-ft) p and x are simetrically together in the solution, like t and f. This is because they are profoundly related to each other. I think this is not the final response for your doubt, but I think can confort some curiosity crise. Lol See ya!
@hellboy_____2019
@hellboy_____2019 4 года назад
Gustavo de Oliveira Thank you Gustavo, I truly appreciate your efforts and share your knowledge here. I really found this informative. Thank you, God bless.
@027_manishdixit7
@027_manishdixit7 2 года назад
He already explained in the start of the video that both position and velocity are conjugate variables
@georgemolnar7344
@georgemolnar7344 2 года назад
@@027_manishdixit7 Saying they are conjugate variables means nothing. It is like defining integration as the inverse of differentiation. Nobody cares what a variable is. Nobody cares what conjugate means. The question is clear and appropriate: Why are position and momentum the FT of each other? Actually it is more. appropriate to ask why certain "pairs" are so linked. And not the simplistic answer that momentum depends on wavelength and position depends on distance. Why aren''t wave number and angular frequency also paired?
@justinotherpatriot1744
@justinotherpatriot1744 2 года назад
It would help to know how the Heisenberg Principle was originally derived. Was it from the Schrodinger equation? If you've found out or ever find out, let me know.
4 года назад
More often than not I find it hard to fully comprehend subjects explained in your videos. I get the message. Most if not all the logic behind it. But due to deficiencies in my educational background and lack of any scientific experience I often fail at math or physics. Yet I find myself trying and rewinding your videos. Your explanations seem so approachable, that I always have an impression that with some extra effort (and enough replays), "I'll be there with you". Thank you for your work-is truly appreciated.
@soppdrake
@soppdrake 4 года назад
I was hopeless at maths at secondary school. So bad, in fact, that I was relegated to arithmetic class. Now, over 55 years later, I am still hopeless at maths. Fortunately, I have an interest in astronomy and science, which is steeped in maths. A lot of the subjects you bring up are fundamental to hard science and I enjoy being able to finally grasp what I am missing out on. Keep up the very good work you are doing. Physics looks like a blast once you can figure out its tools. Where was your method of explanation when I was a lad?
@jcinaz
@jcinaz 4 года назад
Einstein wasn’t very good at math either. Almost failed in elementary school math. I understand that he had his wife or someone else go over his math for completeness and accuracy.
@riturajgautam7502
@riturajgautam7502 4 года назад
Dude , Einstein was a genius, at math Masterd diffirential calculas by the age of 15 The only reason he was not good at maths in school was because he didn't agree with a lot of things taught at the time
@vishank7
@vishank7 4 года назад
You must check out 3Blue1Brown's channel here on RU-vid! Trust me, his explanations are a treat!💎
@tasfa10
@tasfa10 3 года назад
I watched Up and Atom's video on the uncertainty principle where she gave the compromising the measurement of position vs compromising the measurement of velocity explanation in terms of firing a photon with more or less energy and how much that will knock off the electron and my mind was blown by finally finding an intuitive explanation. But I immediately thought that seemed more like a limitation of the technology we have to measure than a property of the electron itself.... And right after I watched your video and my mind was de-blown and re-blown all over again just like that! haha great video!!
@yannimohamed2349
@yannimohamed2349 3 года назад
The explanation of the link between the Fourier transforms and the Uncertainty Principle made a lot of things clear as to how this principle is in effect. Thanks, man.
@gok_dogan
@gok_dogan Год назад
I have seen heisenberg uncertainty formulas for years. But after this explanation meaning of heisenberg uncertainty is certainty meaning in terms of what this formula is telling. 👏👏👏
@ravipande8639
@ravipande8639 Год назад
Simply fantastic Partha ! Nowhere else I could find such beautiful, easy to understand, way of explaining Heisenberg uncertainty principle but also Fourier transformation. God bless you.
@ManojDas-oe4gj
@ManojDas-oe4gj 3 года назад
No matter how long the video is , keep making such types of videos. It's really helpful to me and hopefully to other.
@MLai-iv1qg
@MLai-iv1qg 5 лет назад
This is extremely helpful compared to other videos on RU-vid, thank you for making it!
@Roberto-REME
@Roberto-REME 4 года назад
You are an outstanding explainer. Really well done.
@finthechat7134
@finthechat7134 5 лет назад
Thank you this helps clean up my very rudimentary understanding of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.
@yuvrajsinghsengar3196
@yuvrajsinghsengar3196 4 года назад
What the hell bro seriously this is the best explanation i ever herd or veiw all about Heisenberg uncertainty principle 💯..... Brø ¡ appreciate your work🙏 you are just awesome! ☺️
@BoZhaoengineering
@BoZhaoengineering 3 года назад
This is the best explanation of uncertainty principle so far! After having seeing several videos. It is understandable especially you have a STEM degree but still want to learn more about the basic physics theory.
@notlessgrossman163
@notlessgrossman163 3 года назад
Very succinct, worth rewinding often and reviewing. Thanks Parth
@ashishvarma4293
@ashishvarma4293 4 года назад
The way you explained this topic was easy to understand for a CA student. I was stucked into this topic while reading Stephen hawking book brief history of time . Thanks parth
@akashbasavaraj238
@akashbasavaraj238 4 года назад
Found the Best way to make people love Physics... Never seen such a beautiful way of explaining "complicated" science.. ❤️
@nilanjandasTV
@nilanjandasTV 4 года назад
Yes . Your channel is growing fast and I'm truly happy for that. Your channel is underrated . You deserve much much attention . I try to spread your channel as much as i can in my college ! Thanku your videos makes me happy . I'm a dropout physics student , you make me fall in love with physics again . (I'm currently doing engineering and your topics are in my syllabus)
@lionofbabil
@lionofbabil 4 года назад
Excellent job explaining what is considered a very mathematical concept in well understood but uncompromised terms
@SidharthGat
@SidharthGat 3 года назад
Awesome man, absolutely awesome 👍 Didn't needed to rewind even once while watching at 1.5x. + more detailed than other videos on the same topic + well explained.
@stevecooper6473
@stevecooper6473 Год назад
As a lecture demonstration, I used to use a storage oscilloscope, a tuning fork, and a microphone. The tuning fork Produced a nice clean wave with well defined frequency but very poorly defined duration... I then blank the oscilloscope, and clap my hands. That produced an irregular wave form totally indeterminate in frequency but very sharply defined in time.
@briank.daniels7939
@briank.daniels7939 2 года назад
With a 1964 Ph.D. in physics I was astonished that I did not know that conjugate variables were Fourier transforms of each other. Thanks.
@vaithiesh.jjayasankar7910
@vaithiesh.jjayasankar7910 2 года назад
13:05, The best moment of this video, All things started joining together, thank you soo much for this wonderful video
@lisakowalski9175
@lisakowalski9175 3 года назад
The conceptual is trickier in some ways than the mathematical. Thanks for this video series that tackles concepts. You are the best, Parth!
@anthonycaldwell3283
@anthonycaldwell3283 2 года назад
Brilliant job. Didn't connect the Fourier transform aspect at all but this makes so much more sense. Will have to watch a few more times to lock this in. Thank you so much.
@lisasteel6817
@lisasteel6817 4 года назад
I knew the uncertainty principle before, but now I understand the uncertainty principle. Thank you.
@MrMas9
@MrMas9 5 лет назад
Really enjoy this series! Keep 'em coming :)
@peterburrows8850
@peterburrows8850 2 года назад
Thanks Parth, i really enjoy listening to your podcasts.
@ec6093
@ec6093 4 года назад
Great content! Thanks for the simple and clear explanation!! Would also like to see how the probability distribution of the position and the momentum could be mutually fourier-transformed.
@jeanchauvus3337
@jeanchauvus3337 3 года назад
Very good! Thanks I'll watch all your videos by now
@DanyalShabirr
@DanyalShabirr 3 года назад
6:06 I was waiting for this. Many a people have wrong info about the uncertainty principle. However this explanation is also stated in the " Brief history of time" by hawkings.
@navyanair3222
@navyanair3222 Год назад
wonderfully explained!! you gave every necessary bit of information and built it up really nicely, thank you :)
@esmeorson943
@esmeorson943 Год назад
so glad that I found this channel!!!
@AbhishekKanti
@AbhishekKanti 3 года назад
Just amazing! Today I got the feel of this concept.
@antoninbesse795
@antoninbesse795 4 года назад
Great 2 for 1 offer - Heisenberg + Fourier made simple. Great video, and love your style and energy.
@marspalk7611
@marspalk7611 8 месяцев назад
I agree. 2 for one. Imagine electrical engineering or system engineering with out fourier transforms and quantum physics without uncertainty principle.
@makiabe8323
@makiabe8323 2 года назад
thank you so much! you went quite in depth! A LOT of info., i will try to review it a few more times !
@LalitYadav-jh2ks
@LalitYadav-jh2ks 4 года назад
Love you dude..You content is amazing
@Forever._.curious..
@Forever._.curious.. Год назад
The way he mostly keeps things real , in depth and mathematically working than that of touching topics superficially as some non-physicist ppl do
@rajatghosh5966
@rajatghosh5966 4 года назад
It's just mesmerizing !!! Thank you for the explanation
@donaldmurray4350
@donaldmurray4350 4 года назад
Very enjoyable and engaging video. In a respectable manner, I surely do envy this young guy's genius, or marginal genius. Roll on bro.
@sasadasifh
@sasadasifh Год назад
Great video. You made such a difficult concept so interesting and simple 😊.
@jeromemanceau4263
@jeromemanceau4263 3 года назад
Always such a pleasure to listen to your explanations! 👏👏
@BLACKx-571
@BLACKx-571 4 года назад
I have never seen explanation like this.awesome
@davidrocheQuantumStrategy
@davidrocheQuantumStrategy Месяц назад
Great teaching……and amusing as well. Keep it coming
@Damiii9
@Damiii9 4 месяца назад
Yeahhh finally after watching many videos i finally understood what that uncertainity principle thing actually is !!!! Thank youuu sooo much!!
@albertopiedra7819
@albertopiedra7819 4 года назад
Love the way you explain Fourier. Wish you make a video just about Fourier Transformation but with some more details.
@Mk-me8pm
@Mk-me8pm 2 года назад
Thank you so much Parth!!!
@markosullivan6444
@markosullivan6444 4 года назад
Superb description, thank you. I'd love to see your explaining skills applied to gravitational waves. Specifically, how LIGO works, and what it would be like to be close to the black hole mergers that LIGO detects.
@josh9224
@josh9224 4 года назад
Wow that's a very cool explanation about uncertainty principle never heard before like this one
@Israel-wv2gl
@Israel-wv2gl 2 года назад
This was a great explanation thanks man
@mananshah7889
@mananshah7889 4 года назад
People always say there's no way of getting around to things that are hard, until a true genius is born. I am sure that we will have better understanding of quantum mechanics in future. Current definitions and theory are based on partial understanding.
@geraldpalmer1027
@geraldpalmer1027 4 года назад
Thank you, 10 more viewings will help. Excellent synopsis. Takes the spooky stuff out, logic in.
@momekh
@momekh 4 года назад
OK, so after watching a bunch of your brilliant videos, one thing is for certain: your videos simply are not to be watched at 1.5x speed. A rush of information so well presented and explained. Thank you Parth! :)
@cknarayan5010
@cknarayan5010 2 года назад
I watch them at 0.75 x! It is tough to keep up else. You keep thinking as he speaks and if you watch it on higher speed then the thinking interferes with the listening!
@williamwalker39
@williamwalker39 3 месяца назад
The Heisenberg Uncertainty principle is not about our inability to measure the position and momentum in experiments, but about their actual values, which may or may not be measured in an experiment, and this is made clear using the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, which interprets the ∆ differently from the other interpretations in Quantum Mechanics. Whereas the other interpretations say ∆ corresponds to a random distribution with a range, Pilot Wave theory assumes ∆ has a Gausian distribution for the range, but with an average value in the middle. Here is derivation of the relation: ∆f ∆wavelength >= c directly from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP), where f is the frequency, and c is the speed of light: ∆x ∆p >= h. But for a wave ∆x corresponds to ∆wavelength. From quantum mechanics, ∆p=h/∆wavelength = h∆f/c, since wavelength x f =c, or ∆wavelength = c/∆f. So inserting ∆x=∆wavelength and ∆p= h∆f/c into HUP yields: ∆f ∆wavelength >= c. Using this relation, and using the interpretation from Pilot Wave theory, where the ∆ correspond to a range of values with an average. Then if light is emitted from a source, where the frequency (f) is known, then near the source the wavelength is completely unknown due to Fourier theory, thus ∆wavelength=infinity. Consequently the speed of light is infinite very near the source. But after propagating about one wavelength from the source, according to Fourier theory, ∆wavelength becomes approximately equal to the wavelength, and thus the speed of light is approximately c. At extreme astronomical distances from the source, according to Fourier theory, ∆wavelength never becomes exactly equal to the wavelength. So the speed of light never becomes exactly c. The speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has also been proved by Electrodynamic theory and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton. Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles. *RU-vid presentation of above arguments: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-sePdJ7vSQvQ.html *More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1 Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997
@mnada72
@mnada72 4 года назад
Why ??? why no body made this link before ??? You are absolutely amazing . Thank you
@anilkumarchalissery5462
@anilkumarchalissery5462 4 года назад
ideas you put are amazing,thanks a lot
@anabishop1531
@anabishop1531 День назад
Really well explained!!!
@prof.manjeetsinghjcboseust9034
@prof.manjeetsinghjcboseust9034 4 года назад
You are right Uncertainty is not due to measurement, it is the inherent nature of quantum system.
@xXSoutwarDXx
@xXSoutwarDXx 4 года назад
Well done, even for me that i am a spanish speaker you explained it so well
@vedantchimmalgi463
@vedantchimmalgi463 5 лет назад
Thanks man You really helped me understand this
@MichaelHarrisIreland
@MichaelHarrisIreland 4 года назад
Excellent, but i would not have understood it if I hadn't some clue of Fourier transformations of which I had little clue anyway but your video helped to understand them a little better. Still I'm struggling with them but it's not your fault. You're doing an amazing job. I love how you cleared up the idea of the light bouncing off the particle as not being the uncertainty principle, that was an awakening for me. I now know it is nothing to do with that but it is a fundamental law of physics. So much more beautiful a proof than the haphazard bouncing light.
@sciencefellows777
@sciencefellows777 2 года назад
Thanks for the video.
@emadmohit5202
@emadmohit5202 4 года назад
Wow, I first ran into the videos and was amazed how much I understood but especially how much I didn't. Then when I read some of the comments I got even more confused. But still, I thought the lectures totally awesome.
@clint330
@clint330 4 года назад
just curious if the momentum plot in your example plots was actually correlated to be the Fourier transform of the position plot in your example plots or if you just put up a general approximation. you do an awesome job by the way and so glad your viewership is growing fast! I'm putting my friends that are wanting to learn more on to your channel. way to go!
@theartisticactuary
@theartisticactuary 3 года назад
I,m just glad to find someone else that's happy that the uncertainty principle is just "because maths" and doesn't like the explanation about position observations making photons bounce off particles and change the particle momentum. That alternative explanation is (as you see in the comments) just asking for people to create Heath Robinson equipment that will measure position and momentum at the same time and violate the principle.
@quintonwilson8565
@quintonwilson8565 3 года назад
A phenomenal explanation.
@varunmk956
@varunmk956 4 года назад
Mate, could u come up with a video on the Fourier Transforms? U explain well, concise and clear. Guess that ll make DFT simpler explained by u.
@pierrevillemaire-brooks4247
@pierrevillemaire-brooks4247 4 года назад
You have amazing tutoring skills ! Keep up the great work :-)
@MertOzdag
@MertOzdag Год назад
Great video, thank you
@kushanmadhushan803
@kushanmadhushan803 Год назад
Excellent explanation...
@athensmoe5872
@athensmoe5872 4 года назад
Even speaking is a little faster for me,I do understand your explaination very well Thanks a lot.
@samuelmelke4111
@samuelmelke4111 4 года назад
Very nicely explained! ... I was expecting you would mention so examples other than position and momentum.
@marspalk7611
@marspalk7611 8 месяцев назад
Great expalination. This is first video i have seen that explain uncertinity principle in term of fourier tranform in time and frequecy domain. Otherwise it is always expalined as act of mesurement disturbs position and momentum and light particle photon interacting with measurements. As you said all tha the mumbo jumbo.
@IBITZEE
@IBITZEE 4 года назад
Great video thanks... About FFT I wouold suggest you make a video abouth this... for the video script I suggest : 1) show a few composite waves... 1 pure-sin, 2 combined (1+1/2), 3 combined (1+1/2+1/4), 4 combined (1+1/4)... 2) decompose each at a time,,, from the 1st with the narrow format you shown... 2nd... etc.... 3) well... show the math for each one of them... 4) if possible show some practical examples where this methods are employed,,, ZEE
@grahamtacon822
@grahamtacon822 3 года назад
That was wonderful, thanks man
@ShekaranJagadeesan
@ShekaranJagadeesan 4 года назад
6:14 i was waiting for this line
@pranav.dilsephysics
@pranav.dilsephysics 2 месяца назад
great explanation ❤
@hansvetter8653
@hansvetter8653 2 года назад
I like your presentations a lot because you put aside math, because math can never ever explain anything, but only describing something with precision ... But your talk do also only describe Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. You answered the WHAT it is question, but not the WHY it exist in nature question ...
@vaibhavbagthria5659
@vaibhavbagthria5659 2 года назад
Great great explanation 😍
@tryst1384
@tryst1384 3 года назад
best explanation...👌👌👌
@preranadash9640
@preranadash9640 3 года назад
You are the best :) Thanks a lot for this video
@vtbhanukiran1231
@vtbhanukiran1231 4 года назад
Dear Parth, Could you do a video on the maths which gets applied in Physics. May be a few series. Fourier transforms, Divergence, Partial differential eqns, etc. It would be useful. You explanations are really great and easy to understand. But physicists also require a little mathematics brush-up. Thanks. Kiran
@davidwright8432
@davidwright8432 3 года назад
Parth will I'm sure get round ot it. Meantime check out the math explanations given on RU-vid by 3brown1blue. They're clear, visually very well illustrated, and are very helpful.
@harshavardhan5584
@harshavardhan5584 2 года назад
Physicists require more mathematics than a mathematician...
@vedabrataporel5878
@vedabrataporel5878 2 года назад
Sir, you are amazing. Sir, kindly upload video on Fourier Transform.
@shanmukhasain1334
@shanmukhasain1334 Год назад
I really love your videos 😍
@MaruriPorzio
@MaruriPorzio 4 года назад
Excellent! Please post an explanation to the two other Maxwell 's equations! Great job
@flyhigh5079
@flyhigh5079 3 года назад
Thank you soooooo much💗💗
@sowmyag5142
@sowmyag5142 5 лет назад
I love these videos😀😀😀😀 Very interesting and fun.
@Raphael_NYC
@Raphael_NYC 4 года назад
Wonderful. Thank you
@akshitkohli1806
@akshitkohli1806 4 года назад
Easy digestible information at one place!
@barbufodor1186
@barbufodor1186 4 года назад
great job .... excellent
@douglasstrother6584
@douglasstrother6584 4 года назад
Too long? Not even 15 minutes, and I'm just getting warmed-up! ;)
@shyammudgal4758
@shyammudgal4758 3 года назад
Finally some good and new explainatiin
@hussiendaeeh
@hussiendaeeh 4 года назад
Thank you very much
Далее
UNO!
00:18
Просмотров 954 тыс.
Demystifying the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
9:58
The Uncertainty Principle and Waves - Sixty Symbols
15:46
Roger Penrose - Is Mathematics Invented or Discovered?
13:49
Quantum Superposition, Explained Without Woo Woo
13:11
Просмотров 413 тыс.