@@supremeseregios6810 but there is almost nothing to indicate that was sarcasm? It seems like something someone would say, to me it seems like you are just trying to backpedal
One of the bios in completing the mission is "henry stickmAn" and the description says he was so annoyed at people accusing him by robbery, but they called him stickmIn instead of stickmAn by mistake, that he joined the toppats to be a criminal like everyone says.
*Henry Stickmin* "He's short on cash so it's time to go get some." *(Not to be confused with Henry StickMAN)* EDIT: Yo what are y'all doing here all I did was correct the title
*OBJECTION!* *desk slam* There's no way Edgeworth would let Wright get away so easily! Only Winston Payne is pathetic enough to act this way! I claim that the representative for the stick-prosecutor should have been Payne, rather than Edgeworth!
To be honest, this makes me think; We know Henry DID break into the bank, but the evidence all lined up perfectly to say he didn't. Henry has his fair share of odd abilities, such as using Ra-Doh-Fus (Skyrim) in Completing the Mission, blowing up that same space station by anime screaming, and even has a Stand in one route. That begs the question... Could he REALLY tie the knot from the outside? I think he could. And that makes me question just how often Phoenix's "truth" really holds up, and if the true murderer actually got away...
I know I’m one year late, but Henry blew up the space station by attempting to smash open the barrier holding the emerald. Not screaming at an explosive decibel.
@@disc_00 It's not like I get distracted when I see Henry. Heck, I don't even get distracted in the 'distract' fail. It's not me who's supposed to be distracted, it's the guards. It's one of the funniest scenes in the game, completely ruined by this meme.
And now I can finally understand as a full Italian who knows how to read and listen English what they were saying. When I was 6 I thought they were just making random noises lol I mean they were too fast to talk for me
You do know that the prosicutor in the Henry Stickman game was Manfred Von Karma and the officer was officer mikins right? The dev actually confirmed this in his full playthrough
furthermore, i present to the court the recording of the vault taken during his "robbery". what do you see? a man is in a money sack, utterly motionless. suddenly, he comes to his feet, as if jolted awake, and struggles with the bag around him, flailing as if in panic. finally, the bag bursts open, and he emerges triumphantly, only to stand confused and distraught as the alarms blared. are these the actions of a man who planned a scheme to rob this bank? or that of bewildered and lost man just emerging from unconsciousness, with no idea of where he is? and what of this device we found on his person? this is a personal teleportation device, an emergent new technology, not yet widely adopted. if he was really trying to break this bank, why would he not simply teleport inside? he could easily rob the place blind that way, and provided he dress appropriately to conceal his identity from the cameras, they'd be none the wiser! they wouldn't even begin to suspect this obscure technology until long after the investigation went dry, and he'd get off scott free. but he didn't! and not only that, when he was caught, did he use it to make his getaway, like he easily could have? no! he stood there, and let himself be arrested! like many a law abiding citizen who believed themselves to have done nothing wrong would have. and i briefly mentioned concealing his identity, didn't i? he did nothing of the sort! nothing to hide his face, no gloves to avoid leaving fingerprints, nothing! he shows no signs of having prepared in the slightest for this supposed "heist". it's almost as if he had no idea at all that he would be in that vault at all until THAT. VERY. DAY. and let's go back to that bag again. here, take a good long look at it. notice anything unusual? no? precisely. it is a normal, unblemished bag, barring a few bruises from the defendant's flailing. damn near factory new. why is this important? well, as Mr. Paquet-Delisle so kindly pointed out, there is a way someone might be able to put themselves in a bag tied by them from the outside: if they were to cut it open, and stitch it back from the inside. but not only were no such tools found on his person, even had he some manner of easily disposable tool, like a sewing needle and thread, under such conditions even masters of the craft would leave obvious signs of the patch job. and yet, NOT. ONE. THREAD. is out of place! and again, this is a brand new money bag, indistinguishable from any of the others on that truck, or in that vault. those are hard to come by, for exactly this sort of reason. sure, a skilled thief could come by one, but we've clearly shown that if my client is truly a thief, he is far from a competent one. but who would have very easy access to them, for whom it would be a trivial matter to "lose" one of them for his own personal use? i think you know exactly who i am referring to. yes, the evidence is incontrovertible. there is no chance within any kind of reasonable doubt that this crime could have possibly happened as the witness claims. meanwhile, he had every opportunity to pull off his own crime, one far more devious than the supposed bumblings of my client. it was nearly the perfect crime. you can hardly blame him, even. as you can see from this doctor's analysis, he put the defendant through quite the ringer: heavy vehicular impact, severe burns, crushing underneath a massive blunt object, and just to finish him off, high explosives detonated at a very short distance from his body. but even through all of that, you still underestimated his sheer resilience and determination to survive and see justice done. and that is why you failed! no matter how hard the guilty scheme, justice will always prevail so long as the innocent have the will to see it done!
0:53 About that... he could've done it. You see, in Alexandre Dumas' famed novel "The Count of Monte Cristo", the main character, Edmond Dantès, is falsely accused of treason and sent to the worst jail in all of Europe : Le Chateau d'If. After spending years there, he and the man in the next cell made a tunnel connecting their two cells. The other man ended up dying from a brain tumor iirc, and the people in charge of the jail put his body in a bag like mentionned in the vid, knot on the outside and all. Edmond Dantès proceeded to cut open the bag, remove his friend's body and hide him in his own bed, so Edmond would appear to be sleeping, and hid in the bag, knitting it back up from the inside. It was successful and he managed to escape from the Chateau d'If and proceed with his adventures. TLDR : Edmond Dantès, in "The Count of Monte Cristo", cut open the bag, hid in it and knit it back up from the inside.
"TAKE THAT!" "Is-Is that the bag that the defendant hid in?" "Yes, but there is one thing that has been bothering me... if the defendant was really hiding in this bag then HOW DID HE TIE THE KNOT FROM THE OUTSIDE OF THE BAG?!" "W-What?" "If he was in the bag it would be impossible for him to tie the knot from the outside" "But then...How did he do it?" "Its simple... he didn't" "Wh-What are you saying!?" "I'm saying my client wasn't hiding in that bag at all... He was stuffed in there! By this very witness!" "What!?" "As you can see from this doctors analysis, the victim took quite the beating. While he was in the bag... He was unconscious!" "This is absurd!" "The witness was trying to dispose of the body. He left the defendant in the bag knowing he would drive by it on the way to the bank. When him and his partner passed the bag, he convinced his partner to throw the bag in with the other." "But, why would he do that?" "Why? to dispose of the body of course. There are millions of bags of money in that bank. The witness knew that it would take a long time until the body was found. But unfortunately for the witness... His victim woke up and tried to escape his tomb. He was arrested in the spot and the witness thought everything was over. But its come back to haunt him now!" "I- no.. This can't be happening to meeeee!"
But wait...we know Henry actually did hide in the bag, but that was just his lawyer doing his job, so how did Henry actually tie the knot on the outside? O_o
Phoenix: "As you can see from this Doctor's analysis,the victim took quite the beating. While he was in the bank,he was unconscious!" Edgeworth: *Objection!* *finger wag* "My apologies Mr.Wright but that autopsy report is outdated" *And then the episode becomes a 6 hour episode*
Hold it! Just because there is a difference in the names, DOESN’T MEAN THEY AREN’T THE SAME PERSON! Take the Smash Brothers universe, you can have eight players playing as the same fighter, this *also* applies to other universes, especially the universe we are speaking about! There is evidence that each ending spawns a new universe *based on your decisions!* Another example is Charles! He can be alive, *AND* dead at the same time, due to multiple universes and timelines!
@@dizzyfl.p Objection! There is a person confirmed to be Henry Stickman. He can be seen in CtM and confirmed in the bios. As Henry Stickman is a background character that establishes himself without any interference from Henry, we can confirm his existence in all timelines. There's also fact that he joined the Toppat Clan because people mistook Stickman for Stickmin and the fact that there were many other cases that were decided by specific wording. Therefore the verdict would apply to Henry Stickman and not Henry Stickmin. I rest my case. Edit: Rearranged Sentence. Edit 2: corrected ItA to CtM
-Take that! -What is this? -It's evidence -... And how exactly does this prove anything? -Um... I was just kidding let me try... -This no time for jokes! I see no reason to prolong this trial. I find the defendant Henry Stickmin GUILTY *FAIL* "What kind of third-rate lawyer did you hire?"
