Here's the New U.S. Army's Helicopter Replacing the Black Hawk 

The v-280 needs to be designed into different models such as micro, small (5 seats), medium (12-24 seats), medium and large (40-60 seats) and heavy (80-150 seats), seaplanes, etc. The speed needs to reach more than 900 kilometers per hour, the steering, acceleration and deceleration actions must be faster and more flexible (the steering action in the current film is still very slow), and it must be able to function in bad weather. Automatic unmanned driving systems and automatic remote-controlled weapon systems need to be installed to cope with various scenarios. It is also hoped that the SB-1 will be put into production after being equipped with an autopilot system to replace some old and slow helicopter models.

Does nobody remember how many people was killed in that damn osprey?

Black hawks and apaches right: Your just gonna throw us away for this osprey copy right 😂😂😂😂

Excuse Me But this Aircraft will Never Replace the AH-64D Longbow Apache .

Hmmhhh.... Over twice the speed and twice the range of the Blackhawk helicopter? Very Good !

Why blur out an area of the turbo lift props? To hide a mechanical component for transition...

NO WAY IT REPLACES ALL THOSE CHOPPERS

I can see numerous crashes and mishaps in the near future.

This replacing Apache and Blackhawks? What they smoking?! Dung!

There's only one thing to say. Corruption

Look nice. Questions: 1. When it will arrive ( I live in Germany next to US-Army-Airfield in Wiesbaden)? 2. How Loud is it compared to UH-60 Blackhawk? 3. Does it work safe? ...I hope to new Helicoptor is more silent. In Germany the switch from Bo- Helicopter to Eurocopter for Rescueflights was a big Step for Silence.

I think it's a mistake to use that contraption to replace the Blackhawk choppers. Appears they require more room for landing and storage among other things. Just have a bad feeling about it although it may well have a place in our military but, I would not eliminate those black hawks just yet to be on safe side.

How can this replace the AH60 Apache?

They have the osprey which has more or less the same capability as far as I'm aware and they said at the start it will also replace the apache which in my humble opinion would be a mistake

Yeah, let's make another tilt rotor made by the same company as the current crashing tilt rotor. Makes total sense.

No real info till 6:00 mark; first 3:30 is a bunch of executives lauding themselves for winning the contract, next 2:30 is about expenditures and competition.

It is the Vertibird!

You wanna assault the ‘bad guys’ in that? Good luck

so you can't put weapons underneath the wings because of the rotorblades. And you can't put weapons underneath the fuselage because of the landing gear. What about putting weapons on top of the fuselage then?

Apt nickname for the V-280 needs to be the Albatross...

What are the weapons capabilities of these ? They claim its replacing some of the apaches but the only photo I can find of one with weapons is a 3d model

No way I loved the Blackhawk😭

How exactly does this replace Apache?

攻撃機バージョンを作る予算が出て来ればなあ、かなり先に進められるんだが、、、。

How in Gods name is that thing supposed to land in tight areas with that enormous wing span?!! This negates the entire purpose of a helicopter.

I liked the sb1 x more

It would be cool if they put jet engine on it instead of prop !! They pretty much just took the arms from the osprey and put em on a Blackhawk and called it something new

USA aviation technology is leading

Army airfields will have to get much bigger, more and bigger hangers will have to be built, fast roping will be the new normal for inserting troops into a LZ, the 101st will have to dramatically upsize their analysis of where and how many aircraft can fit into a wooded clearing, I mean this list can go on and on.

I think the days of landing in a field of active combat is over. This is a great aircraft for not being shot at.

This is a JOKE RT 🤔🤣

This is a horrifically bad idea that will be remembered historically.

Bummer! Leave the junk technology to the Airforce and Marines

Too many questions how this will replace the Apache, is this for real? The tilt rotary configuration of the boing system has been a deadly disaster to this day.

Looks twice as expensive, and twice as vulnerable to the Blackhawk. Not sure this is the correct path for the Army. Using two big engines (as opposed to one on the Blackhawk), losing just one will cause the aircraft to drop like a rock.

I have watched six videos about this remarkable craft and I'm beginning to wonder if it can transition from Vertical to Horizontal flight. So far, NONE of the videos have shown this. Nor the reverse. (ʘ_ʘ)

Could you send a couple hundred of those ''old'' helicopters to Ukraine? 🙂 We will paint them with some German enamel.

Nice big wide target

That's a big target to be loitering around dropping off air assault troops.

Love US Army🇺🇸❤️

If its production version can, like the V-22, turn its wing for transport and stowage, then it might be workable, but the added weight and complexion will reduce speed & range. The pods, whilst less complex than the Osprey's and capable of translating power to the opposite rotor, are a sitting target for weapon systems that are not reliant on heat-seeking guidance. It should be a given that Bell has worked out the kinks that lead to so many early tilt-rotor rollover crashes, but the potential for such to happen isn't zero. Even though the competing design is also vulnerable to crashes at low-level due to random factors, (the Black Hawk that crashed during the Osama bin Laden compound raid) it, like the UH-60, is engineered to handle such crashes via crumple zones and points on the airframe and seats. The same cannot be said for the Valor should it roll over. Auto rotation at altitude should, I hope, be an integral capability of the V-280. The dynamics of the design favor it being possible, it's a given on the competing design. All around, the choice of the Bell design just doesn't add up. If the Sikorsky design's means of flight was a brand new concept, then I could see the Army Brass going with the "safer" more proven tilt prop design, but such isn't the case, with the SB-1 being derived from the X-2. If the Army does decide to commit to the horse it's chosen, I can only hope that the other branches opt for the other horse in the stable. The Navy/Marines will absolutely need as much space savings as it can get, so they will probably put for the competing design, it's happened before. The Air Force is, as always, variable. Hopefully, the Defiant's team wins their protest.

Does it actually fly, and not kill marines inside. Ya know like the osprey.

ไม่งั้นก็ออกแบบใหม่ทั้งหมดเลยเป็นลูกผสมระหว่างเครื่องชีนุกกับกับเครื่องบิน ใช้งานเอาตามสภาวะแวดล้อม

Looks like more wasteful spending to line the pockets of a few

It's about time military acquisitions pursued greater value for its mission platforms and quit wasting money by throwing it at a Blackhawk manufacturing, and it's oxytocin & weed polluted workforce.

The UH-60 Blackhawk is a beautiful helicopter, I want it to remain operational for many more decades, and never need to be replaced from the useless v280 valor.

V-280 Stolen Valor of the V22-Osprey.

Something no one is talking about is how gay this thing looks…! Like this design doesn’t project power like the Blackhawk or the Apache or the osprey or even the venom… it looks like it belong on a cheap movie for the syfy channel!

abouth them style /one for all and all for us/

you perseption are the same "pure and clean " it is no good.What then .... cage of tomorrow?