#HeyJB 

Not a victim. At best willful ignorance -at worst actively complicit in deed or cover-up. Kids are victims.

She’s NOT a victim. Asa is most likely involved. Notice they always say she was out of town at the time the victims went missing. Heuermann kept the victims & tortured them judging by his “blueprint” ... how long did he keep the victims? Was it enough time for Asa to return home?

No not a victim.

Not a victim

This is Tampa chainsaw massacre! Leatherface & family!

THE PICTURE OF DORIAN GRAY: The sick paintings and/or twisted water color illustrations the deranged Victoria made of her twisted evil father, Rex, do not depict Rex from head to toe. Her bizarre renderings of him engaged in the bondage, mutilation, murder and dismemberment of his poor victims only show parts of Rex's body. There are 4 possible reasons for this: 1) this was simply how Victoria wished to portray her father since he was so fat and huge, she might not have wanted to hurt his feelings if she had to draw him as he truly looks, like an ogre. SIDE NOTE: I, as a cartoonist myself, can tell you that in a case like that, then I would indeed just go ahead and draw Rex from the rear, rear side, or simply just show him from the chest up, anything to avoid showing his big huge pot belly that hung way below his waistline. He did eat like a pig. 2) The second possibility she did not draw Rex full body was simply because she wanted to focus more on depicting his victims than he, though he is prominent in the renderings as well since he was the source of his victims' suffering and misery. 3) It could be that Victoria had limited space on which to paint or draw and since she wanted to show as much of Rex and his dungeon basement as possible, plus his victims, Victoria just did not have the room on her drawing pad or canvas board to show us a full frame of Rex but the glimpses we do see of him in her renderings leave no doubt it is, in fact, Rex Heuermann she was depicting, given the facts we're now aware of in this horrible case. Sketch pads and canvas boards come in various sizes and given Victoria's habit of jamming so many different images in each of her renderings, it is easy to see why she refrained from drawing Rex full body. There really wasn't the space. I would imagine if Victoria had had a billboard on which to draw her father committing these heinous acts of murder and brutality, then she might well have depicted Rex from head to toe, a full body rendering of him. 4) The fourth and last possibility why she never depicted her father in her art work from head to toe was perhaps because she had a concern that if her father ever became a suspect in all those murders, someone in law enforcement with a search warrant of her home, might see her art work and recognize Rex as being the brutal sadist in her renderings. Given such a scenario, if it ever did happen, Victoria would have reasoned in her twisted mind that the police would then realize she herself had been present in her father's dungeon basement when these tortures/rapes and murders took place and that Victoria herself may have actually assisted her father in these crimes. I think any experienced law enforcement officer, investigator, FBI profiler and/or district attorney has to be thinking by now this was likely the case because Victoria's renderings of her father's murders expose the fact she was there. Or else, how then did she come to be inspired to create such horrific art work to begin with? Was not hair from one of the Heuermann women found on the decaying body of one of the girls Rex murdered? Police theorized initially that such a thing could have happened indirectly by Rex simply sitting on the same sofa his daughter or wife sat down on and then one of their hairs transferring to his clothes and then transferring to one of the bodies of one of his victims. But it far more reasonable to conclude there was a direct transfer of this DNA hair evidence as opposed to indirect transfer. Victoria's body made contact with the body of the victim whose remains the police would eventually discover and in that rotting corpse, the hair of Victoria Heuermann was also discovered, a smoking gun she assisted her father in these murders, even if she simply stood there while he committed them but did nothing to stop him or alert police to his crimes. If Victoria Heuermann did not help her father torture and murder and dismember his victims, if all that Victoria did was to be present in that basement at the time these satanic human sacrifices to the devil were being made, if Victoria was actually painting and drawing Rex in real time as he tortured and murdered his victims, then Victoria was part and parcel to those murders because she participated in them to some degree. She may not have been holding a knife, she may have only been holding an artist's brush but with every stroke of that brush against the canvas board, the gory images of her dad killing young women like herself must be viewed as Victoria being an accessory to murder and/or guilty of withholding evidence, her failing to alert police during the many years these murders were being committed and obstruction of justice by lying to police and the DA's office once Rex was a suspect and Victoria lied to police, claiming she knew nothing about her father's crimes and yet there they were, the hideous crimes, which she drew of her father committing them. She participated in mass murder since Victoria was a willing participant in that dungeon. It does not matter whether or not she took a saw, a blade, an ax or an ice pick to the throat of those girls or if she merely painted them as they were being killed. Victoria Heuermannn was engaged in creating snuff art in reel time as it was being committed by her father. Victoria had plenty of time, years even, to contact law enforcement, and report to police what her father had been doing but she chose not to and in so doing, she allowed him to continue killing and mutilating innocent young women, one of which was pregnant. Knowing how many young prosecutors have a habit of taking the easy way out and offering plea deals to witnesses and accomplices, I fear that the DA on Long Island will do just that to Victoria Heuermann one day, that is, if he ever gets around to arresting her for being an accomplice to her father's serial killings. He'd do it in exchange for her testimony against her father. It would not be the first time a duo has been charged with being a couple of serial killers in the same case. It has happened in Texas, Canada and in Los Angeles, that I know of. PICASSO'S SECRET: In my mind, Victoria Heuermann's creepy works of art are damnable against her. I would strongly suggest to the Long Island DA that he have her paintings x-ray'd. The reason for this is simple. Artists who use paint sometimes begin painting a landscape, a still life, a portrait, etc., only to stop if they feel they have made a mistake. They stop and they start all over again and on the very same canvas. Canvas boards are not cheap. Artists like the great Picasso would sometimes do what I am describing here. For whatever the reason, Picasso would cease painting a painting he was working on and then start anew, on the same board. Only, he would paint over whatever images he had originally painted by first painting a colored background over the first painting he wanted to erase, more or less. The secondary coat of a new colored background allowed Picasso the basis on which he could then set about starting his painting all over again. Sometimes he wanted to correct the mistakes he thought he made in the painting the first time around. At other times, Picasso simply painted a brand new painting over the existing old one. So it really wasn't a matter of Picasso erasing the first painting; he was merely painting over it, to disguise the fact he had begun something else initially and then decided he'd rather not complete it, so he'd start again on the same canvas and draw something different. What does Victoria Heuermann have to do with this? She may have, at times, began painting her father in the act of raping and murdering a young woman but for whatever the reason, maybe Victoria felt necessary to start all over again on the same canvas and simply did what Picasso and other artists have done in the past; paint over whatever was painted initially with a new colored background painted over the old one, in which to use as a foundation base to paint a second painting. How was it discovered Picasso did this sometimes with his paintings? By accident when one of his paintings was x-ray'd and it was seen that beneath the outer layer of paint on the canvas, there existed an inner layer of paint, depicting the image of a bull that was hidden to the naked eye. I saw a TV news report about this secret of Picasso may years ago. But lots of artists have done the same thing and Victoria Heuermann may be one of them and she may have done it with her gory paintings about her father It is possible that potential evidence against both Victoria and Rex Heuermann could be gleaned this way by the DA's office if this proved true with any of Victorias' paintings. As it is now, just by Victoria's habit of painting her father torturing, binding, torturing, murdering and dismembering his victims, it should be clear to anyone there could only be one reason why Victoria painted and drew such ghastly imagery, she was there. The canvas she painted on was the lens which she saw through willingly, and with criminal complicity. Victoria was present at the time the murders or some of them, occurred. She is her father's accomplice and she is also guilty of obstruction of justice by withholding this information from the police all these years, even as she sought to exploit the victims' misery by painting their suffering to express the darker aspects of her 'artistry'.

Asa Ellerup is NOT a victim she's an active participant and apparently so is her daughter! New evidence found that could potentially connect their daughter to the musers.

No

Add her to the list of his victims.