Hidden Patterns Found In Roulette Results Part 2 

Now that is a top question!!! Well done Ivan this is exactly how we want people to be thinking and where the channel is heading. So yes is the answer, there are simply 1000's of combinations of dynamic systems that could work together to produce effective systems to work inside of effective strategies. Whie your question is a bit ahead of the channels progress, I will give you an answer, even though it is not perhaps the best of solutions as there are many other concepts like overlapping and wisdom of the pockets still to come before we start connectng dynamic systems properly - but to answer your excellent question . . . Lets say you are montoring the dozens and columns on your probabiity tracker. You see the dozens chart is telling you to aim for a "4" so that is the bet you are aiming for - now split that bet into 3 funnels using the columns - you will now need to win 3 times once for each funnel/column before selectng your next bet. We might have to do a video of this - actually we suggested in why clockwork systems fail that a system is only profitable if you can win 25% profit 5 out of 6 sessions or more, so I think we will demonstrate this with at least 6 session of real play . . . Bear with us . . . we will get round to it.

That's really good to hear and a very sensible approach . . . Thank you for sharing!

Nice work JimmyJames

You are so welcome! Thank you for the comment . . .

i agree with you 👍

How much your unit size and how many units is your 15% profit target? The V2 12 pockets strategy is ok to me too. But I played too small unit size and I played too long because of this. This unit size did not give me enough profit. So i started to use another strategy and of course my balance is zero now LOL

Just keep those outliers high . . .

Yes, I do. We all know that if we write in too many numbers before we start the session then the most of time the probability values will close to the spun numbers. And we can not sit at the table for 20-30 mins to wait for the first bet. So I think better if I write in 12-13 numbers (after 1st number the chart will not show nothing yet) and... every count point on my chart shows me the count's point's value. Also shows me the probability count's point's value. I watch the count 3 , count 4 and count 5 only. If count point 3 or 5 has 3 different to their own expected point, (example: count point 3's value is 2 and the expected point 3's value is 5 or more) then I start betting here. If the count point 4's value smaller with 2 against the expected point 4's then I start betting to this. Now I test it only. Not with real money. I take screenshot (500 previous numbers) in the real casino where I play and log out from the casino. Write in 12 numbers and see what happens. Profit target is 25-30£. If the chart shows the values are too close each other after 20-30 numbers then I go to other table. In this test, I delete all numbers what I wrote in and I start type in the next numbers. Any idea what could I do better? Unit size is £5. If I can take bet to two places then I think better if I use different unit size. Unit size at this point is £1 only.

immersive roulette table is one of my favourite because of more time to thinking.

Thank you for that, theres more (a lot more) on the way but its taking a bit longer to produce than we first thought lol - but good things come to those who wait (apparently!)

You are welcome!

Awesome, thank you!

Fantastic - Just remember to keep those outliers strong, its easy to get carried away after a while and start taking bigger risks. Even monitoring just two groups there will always be some strong outliers around the corner. Something tells me you know exactly what you are doing so we will be interested to see your progress. Good work!

Nice work Jimmy. We - against the greedy or beginner player - know that the casino will win sometimes. In any activity - which is done over a longer period of time - there are good days and bad days. Nobody can hidden from the losing days. We have to prepare for losing sessions. The 15% profit target is ok I think... But I also understand the 25% too. If our profit target 25% then we have to do longer sessions. The short session is always better but the truth is that there is no such thing as a short session. Easy to understand it if you think to any business in the real life. Of course the long session eats more energy and the chance to do mistake is always increases. I personally calculate with 4:1. This means 4 successful sessions against 1 unsuccessful session per week (5 session weekly). If I use 15% profit target then my weekly profit - expressed as a percentage - 60% against 1 unsuccessful session or my stop-loss which is two win-stop target (or 2*15%) of my weekly 4 win-stop target. Let's take a look to a flat win-stop target. Because I also prefer more the flat win-stop against the percentage win-stop. Yes, this means that the percentage profit will decrease at every session but look, in the real life - in our real job - we need earn enough money for our monthly expenses plus some saving money for the unexpected expenses. This can be a well-functioning approach in any business. For example if you use flat win-stop and stop-loss target and the 3rd week in this month you touch your stop-loss target. Then you save much more previous win-stops against the other version - percentage win-stop and stop-loss target. The casino have to fight more with you if they want get back "their money" in this month. I will not write here a full month bankroll management but here is the first 10 sessions. I recommend to use this or similar like this: Starting session..........Bankroll...........Flat win-stop.......Flat stop-loss.......Win-stop bankroll.........Stop-loss bankroll 1 100 20 40 120 60 2a 120 20 40 140 80 2b 60 20 40 80 20 3a 140 20 40 160 100 3b 80 20 40 100 40 3c 20 => minimum 1 week break and deposit 80 4a 160 20 40 180 120 4b 100 => go to 1 4c 40 20 40 60 0 5a 180 20 40 200 140 5b 120 => go to 2a 5c 60 20 40 80 20 5d 0 => minimum 1 week break and deposit 100 6a 200 20 40 220 160 6b 140 => go to 3a 6c 80 => go to 3b 6d 20 => go to 3c 7a 220 20 40 240 180 7b 160 => go to 4a 7c 100 => go to 1 7d 40 => go to 4c 7e 20 => go to 3c 8a 240 20 40 280 200 8b 180 => go to 5a 8c 120 => go to 2a 7d 60 => go to 5c 7e 0 => go to 5d 9a 280 20 40 300 240 9b 200 => go to 6a 9c 140 => go to 3a 9d 80 => go to 3b 9e 20 => go to 3c 10a 300 20 40 320 260 10b 240 => go to 8a 10c 220 => go to 7a 10d 160 => go to 4a 10e 100 => go to 1 10f 40 => go to 4c

I realised just now that you did more real session already. No problem. If you use my recommended bankroll management and your minimum bet is 1 unit then you can go until level 7 only (total invest 30 units). Look at this video at 4:30 If you use half unit like a minimum bet then you can go until level 9 (total invest 39 units). Warning! If you would like to use this management and you want play double covering (dozen and column at same spin or two dozens or two columns bet at same spin) then you need have double starting bankroll too.

I appreciate that!

Glad to hear it! So that's 15% in 18 & 22 spins that's about 60% per hour equivalent - we use 80 spins per hour to calculate out to an hour equivalent, not because we are suggesting people play longer but its a useful metric to compare how systems are performing, for example in the video our 25% took 38 minutes which equated to about 40% per hour. So you have achieved better than the demonstration by reducing your profit goal. That's interesting! I mean even if you look at it the other way you have achieved 30% in 40 Spins against our 25% in 50 spins. Thank you for sharing!

I guess I should be a little more accurate. I do collect data of 20 spins before I put a bet down. The previous 10 results when I load up the live table then I collect the data for the next 10 spins. So the 18 and 22 spins is just when I actually had bets going, so technically it would be 28 and 42 spins. Still a great method so far. I will be attempting another session later tonight.

Wow, thanks! Many more videos to come . . . .

I think we will probably do another video explaining how to calculate the geometric curve, it was a bit too much for that video it was already too long - there is a simple formula but I cant type it in here properly as it only allows plain text but it’s a bit like this "a_n = a_1 * r^(n-1)" another way to think of it is each dozen or column is expected to receive 32.4% of the wins let’s call it 33% to make it easier. So, in 100 spins each of those charts should have received 33 entries. In our 63 spins then it should be about 21 entries for each chart in total. If you think about it then 33% of the time you can expect a repeat win (so an entry in the zero column) so the Blue line at the zero point is 63x0.33x0.33 = 6.8 which is 63 spins times 33% which gives you the 21 total expected entries for the chart, then 33% of 21 is 6.93, but if we had done it properly i.e. 21 x .324 then it’s the 6.8 that you can see the blue line has reached at the zero loss marker. It works the same for all other bet sizes just with a different calculation i.e. number of pockets x (1/37) or pockets x 0.027027 so in our case 12 x 0.027027 = 0.324324 for 18 pockets 18 x 0.27027 = 0.486 so 63x0.486x0.468 = 14.88 would be expected at the zero marker.

Sorry the music is annoying - its partly our novice level of video production ability and might have the levels up too high - however we have found that playing the video back on different device seems to affect the voice and music level differently - like on an iPad you cant hear the music that much, but on a TV with a Sound-bar the music does seem to take over a bit - Including music was tip suggested by professional film-maker www.youtube.com/@FilmBooth (Thank you film booth) and to be honest without the music the video just sounds like a boring lecture - we stick the boom bit in where the logo swipes across the screen to keep people awake lol. Your point is noted though, maybe we might put a folder up of identical videos with the music track muted if there is enough demand.

You are so welcome!

Thank you very much! Always good to hear the hard work is appreciated.

Actually we hadn't heard of the Lucas sequence - just had a quick look and will explore that some more - so thank you for sharing that - apart from the standard martingale all of our progressions are produced by a calculator we programmed some years ago and we will be putting this up in the free members area of our website which should be live by the end of the month - interesting that we got exactly the same sequence certainly in the first 8 levels - like I said we will explore that some more very interesting - thank you.

Ha Ha . . . We know that’s a tongue-in-cheek comment but . . . Everything seems impossible until it's done. With a more serious thought though, very few people ever go the full distance in any field of pursuit, and I mean that respectfully to everyone. I mean starting a diet or going to the gym or learning to meditate or whatever, life offers too many distractions for us to get really good at something unless we become absolutely focused on the goal. I mean laser focused. What does it mean to beat roulette? Anyone can all make a few hundred quid here and there or even a few thousand, nobody gets rich quick with roulette it’s a marathon not a sprint. There's only a small percentage of people that “Make It” in anything, of course the percentages vary for every pursuit but let’s say 3% for a minute. Only 3% of athletes every get within a shot of a gold medal. Only 3% of stocks and share traders ever become like Warren Buffet or Jim Simmons Only 3% of techie’s can be Bill Gates, Steve Jobs (RIP), Zuckerberg, Musk Only 3% of poker players are Daniel Negreanu, Phil Ivey or Dan Bilzerian Only 3% of footballers ever make David Beckham Bucks. You could keep going on and on, but you get the point. Let’s say we have the world’s best roulette strategy only a small percentage of roulette players will find this channel, and only a few percent of those will invest the time it takes to get good enough to change their lives from it. So, I don’t think the casinos will be too worried, If this channel does produce a few more professionals in the future then it will probably also have bring with it a number of people who give up or lose interest. Many thanks for your comment!

Unlike the 3% example above, WITH A PROVEN SURE WIN SYSTEM in CASINO GAMES, it only takes 2-3 such MASTERS to break the CASINO INDUSTRY. Starting with $100 and winning 3% per session, 1 player can go on to win $4.8millions first 365sessions. Then with $4.8mio at 3% per session go on to win $BILLIONS by end of 2nd 365 sessions... I mean 1 session only lasts 2 hours max, and one can squeeze in 3 sessions a day easily, that means, these 2-3 MASTERS could rake in NET WIN of $BILLIONS in under a year .... HAHAHAHAHAHA ... 3% a session = $BILLIONS of WINNING @@roulette-professional

Only 3% of stocks and share traders ever become like Warren Buffet or Jim Simmons --- JIM SIMONS an inspiration that ROULETTE can be beaten by mathematic !

That's the plan! Yes there will be more "Build your own" videos and also downloads and tools available on our website (Very soon! although I've been saying that for two months - progress is being made!)

Many thanks!

You must have a lot of patience, which is a good attribute to have when playing roulette.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by 3rd group or manipulative spins. If you are talking about dealer bias then we do not include that in our systems, if you record a large number of spins over many wheels and dealers and analyse it you will usually find any bias gets cancelled out, so our approach is purely based on probability but looking at multiple data views. The next video (The Devil One - out soon) looks at the total running loss data from all pockets combined. Many thanks for your comments . . .

@@roulette-professional In the video you mentioned about type of gamblers, gamblers fallacy etc I'm saying the 3rd type of gamber could be those that look at ballistics, the way the ball reacts in the wheel.

@@ROULETTE-ProfitandStop Oh I'm sorry - I missed that - I see your point now - I have to confess my knowledge of physics put bluntly - sucks! So my reference to a 3rd group was those on the fence between Probability and fallacy, but of course there has been a lot of work done with physics and its been proven many times you can beat roulette with physics in a laboratory conditions, the casinos are well aware of this and safeguard themselves against it - have a look at an answer above I gave to @JimmyJames562 enquiring about dealer change as I explained with more detail why we focus on math based solutions as opposed to physics. Thanks for your comments - Had a look at your channel too - very interesting!

26:15 "Upon a win we record the loss level from the previous spin." 26:33 "Like we just said upon a win we record the loss level. So we would record a loss of zero then another loss of zero." I think you already answered me in your same video 😅 I was too tired to understand it yesterday. 🙄

But please make a video about this new chart with 10 spin only. Do it slow and speak about this step by step. Because your graph is not really follows what you said earlier.

Firstly - A BIG THANK YOU - I can see you have been helping other viewers - great stuff!. Now lets see If I can help you, I think you are struggling to understand where the geometric data comes from - let just think about the first dozen for a minute, lets assume you see results like this 32,4,17,21,30,14,5,10,23,26,0,15,33,18,24 now we will work backwards from the 24 so you need to count how many results do not include the 1st dozen so we have 24,18,33,15,0,26, and 23 before the first dozen wins with a 10 so you have had 7 losses, so on the 1st dozen chart you would set the 7 to a value of 1 (1 entry recorded) , following on the 5 wins so the first dozen has had zero losses because the 10 just won so on the chart you add a value to the zero. it hard to explain in words and I cannot paste a picture into this box so I hope that helps? - We are thinking about doing a video to build the geometric chart in excel like we did for the probability distribution, but its a lot more complex, we might just wait and add a chart tool to our website.

Thank you! It was clear. But when I played your video with 0.25 speed (sound OFF) from 27:00 then the spins on top right went faster like the datas on the left. And sometimes I did not understand why the data was different from what I thought. You circled the number ( 26:59) with red colour to show what datas will be on the graph on the left. I have tried to follow it (video speed 0.25) but spin1 (on the screen, top right) but the graph did not get nothing. Spin2 and the graph showed the first spin number (8), it was ok (D1 =0 and C2=0), 1st dozen went up +1 on horizontal zero, and also the 2nd column went up +1 on horizontal zero. Because were not loss or any spin number before this. My confuse was because of I saw it when I saw on the top right this: "Spin2". I thought it's a mistake but ok... You did not do it enough clear here but ok. After this the "spin3" arrived but the graph did not get new datas. 🤨and the new datas arrived at "spin4" only. But these datas were correct to 2 spins together. To the 2nd spin number was 28 and 3rd spin number was 31. The new datas were these: 3rd dozen on the graph went up +2 🧐on horizontal zero and 1st column on the graph also went up +2 on horizontal zero. I understand why and it was correct but the graph did not showed it step by step. After this we saw the "spin5" (number 8 by the way) on the screen. The graph showed very clear the 5th spin on the graph right time. The 1st dozen went up +1 on horizontal two. And the 2nd column also went up +1 on horizontal two. After this arrived the "spin6" (number 29) and the datas arrived too. 3rd dozen went up +1 on horizontal one. And 2nd column went up +1 on horizontal zero. Because the second column was the winner at spin5 too. So now it is clear. Thank you. But please try to be careful a bit with this. Easier to understand everything if isn't slipping.

@@dikazdma -Ahh - the video was only showing a graphical representation of the numbers disappearing up the right hand side and the charts filling up with data - we didn't think or expect someone to play it back in slow motion (we've just learned a valuable lesson!) - LOL - the software we have that actually captures the data in real time is a lot more complex and we didn't want to confuse matters further by having to explain a complex piece of software at this point - so although the data was correct at the end of the clip it wasn't actually done in real time. There is a small section in the Gamblers Fallacy video that explain how to capture geometric data, its explaining something else but this might just give you a better understanding. Try this from 4 Minutes 20 Seconds in . . . ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-oioOoATeYq4.html

That's a great analogy - might have to steal that . . .

Do you have a copy of your session plan? Did you record the spins in a copy of the probability tracker? Its really hard to tell you what when wrong without some detail, we don't know what size of bet you were playing or what outliers you were waiting for, what stake you had available, what progression you were playing, how many spins you played for etc, etc.

@@roulette-professional I did the exact thing you did in the video. Loaded the first 13 spins and betted on the outliers. None of my spins hit.

Everything is on our website - www.roulette-professional.com

Yes, that is also an interesting view, We just covered something similar in Do Casinos Cheat Episode 5 Where we looked at the number of doubles we got in 500 spins (500/37=13.5) its the same calcuation for pocket distances, so basically in 500 spins you should see the ball land one place to the right of previous winner about 13 times in 500 spins or 1 place to the left or 15 places to the right etc - all of these events should happen about 13 times in 500 spins, its another way to check if the results are truly random. The same can be said for the number values i.e. how often the result will increase in value by 1 - by that we mean you might see 23,24 so the value went up by 1 or you might see 17,16 so the value went down by 1 these events should also happen 13 times in 500 spins (across all pockets, not specific nummbers)

@@roulette-professional Yes i just watch your another video of pocket distance, luv your video and mad respect for it, for all the works & efford you make ! I did similiar stuff with excel, but when im winning im not using the excel i makes lol, or maybe it is all in my mind+playing with sense at the same time.

That's all very true, there is a bit more depth on (P)n in the video Why Clockwork systems fail (ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZIoAvogwaUI.html) and in our latest video we look at playing much smaller bets and over lapping them which works even better with the low start/deep pockets/high house limit approach (ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-aivh_GaKYp0.html)

The quick answer is no you don't need to start again; it doesn't matter if they change the dealer. The long answer is . . . There is a lot of talk about dealer bias and wheel deficiency but that is the realm of physics and those studying ballistics. Ballistics, in the context of roulette, involves understanding the physics of how the ball is launched, how it travels around the wheel, and how it eventually comes to rest in a pocket. This includes factors like the speed of the wheel, the speed of the ball, the trajectory of the ball, and how these factors interact which of course can be affect by the dealer or change in dealer. Several documented cases exist of people beating roulette using physics and I have included some details at the bottom of this reply as they are all interesting in their own right. Our methods however are purely based on math, using a wide range of techniques and trying to exploit patterns in random data - people say there are no patterns in random data but roulette is not truly random, decaying atoms, and the trailing digits of Pi are said to be random, Roulette has a finite set of outcomes (even if it is astronomical) so patterns will form. Changing the dealer is the casinos attempt to sustain randomness and that’s what our methods are trying to exploit. A lot of the methods we use were inspired by a horse race gambler called William Benter who is reported to be a billionaire now, well he’s at least worth 100’s of millions - he’s a fascinating character and although his methods do not traverse into roulette, we have adapted many of his ideas. PHYSICS/BALLISTICS -------------------------------------------- Joseph Jagger (1873): Often referred to as "The Man Who Broke the Bank at Monte Carlo," Joseph Jagger is one of the earliest recorded individuals to exploit roulette wheel biases. He hired clerks to secretly record the outcomes of the roulette wheels at the Beaux-Arts Casino in Monte Carlo and discovered that one wheel was biased towards certain numbers due to mechanical imperfections. He then bet on these numbers and won a substantial amount of money. Dr. Richard Jarecki (1960s-1970s): Dr. Jarecki was a medical professor who won over a million dollars at European casinos during the 1960s and 1970s. He used a method similar to Jagger's, observing and recording thousands of spins to identify biased wheels. He then capitalized on these biases by placing strategic bets. The Eudaemonic Pie (Late 1970s): A group of University of California, Santa Cruz students, known as the Eudaemons, used physics and technology to beat roulette. They built a small computer that could predict where the ball would land based on the laws of motion. The computer, hidden in a shoe, would send signals to the user to indicate where to bet. While they had some success, the practical difficulties of implementing the system in a casino environment limited its effectiveness. Gonzalo Garcia-Pelayo (1990s): A Spanish record producer, Gonzalo Garcia-Pelayo, used computers to analyze the tendencies of roulette wheels at the Casino de Madrid. By identifying numbers that came up more often than the laws of probability would suggest, he was able to gain an edge over the casino. Over several years, he and his family won millions of Euros. These examples showcase the use of physics and analysis to exploit roulette wheel biases. However, it's important to note that casinos have become much more adept at detecting and preventing such strategies. Modern roulette wheels are designed and regularly maintained to ensure randomness, and casinos employ various measures to guard against predictive betting strategies. As a result, successfully using physics to beat roulette in contemporary casinos is exceedingly difficult, if not impossible.

@@roulette-professional thank for for that reply. Very informative and interesting as well.

@@roulette-professional Nice answer, you really spent time to this comment too. But it is not important. Because this comment will be here for everybody forever I hope :)

But the diamond will alter the probability😢.

A lot of people talk abut dealer bias etc, we looked at that a long time ago but couldn't really see it made any difference to the results over a reasonable sample of spins and sessions, a lot of the time its our perception over a small number of spins that give us the impression the dealer makes a difference.

Never tired of seeing anyone's comments but it is taking us longer to reply these days as the channel gets busier and the questions become more complex lol - I just wished we could get the videos out faster and the tools built quicker. The range is a fairly important point, if the range is tight then you are likely to see a long run loss in the near future. "Similar comparisons could be made with mode and median, expected vs actual. So if the expected mean were 3.08 for dozens, and the actual mean is 4.5 we could then look towards the mode to determine where the imbalance currently is in the geometric distribution? " - Yes that's true per set but also consider the sets against each other with the group. The next video just went live about ten minutes ago . . . So far all the videos are kind of just introducing a number of concepts and we need to delve deeper into every area, the difficult part is every viewer is at a different level and its taking forever to produce this type of video as there's very little stock footage we can use . . . but we are getting there . . .

​@@roulette-professional Thanks for the reply. I really appreciate the information. I'm seeing how you're tying concepts together that people have been trying to connect for years. Law of the third, John solitudes interval betting, etc.. Have you ever looked into the birthday paradox? I ran some quick math on it... If you take the last n most recent numbers, according to the birthday paradox your probability of one of those increases on each successive spin - as long as you add the most recent numbers to the pool (people entering the room). So at 7 numbers our prob that the 8th is a repeater of those 7 is like 55%.. At 12 it's a 91% prob that the 13th is a repeat of those 12. Math could be off - I did it quickly. On it's own it's fairly useless, but it may fit in somewhere...

Thank you . . .

Hi - Just had a quick look online and it appears you can use a tool like www.veed.io/tools/video-translator to translate the video - it isn't something we have thought about yet as the channel is only a few months old and we are focused on getting some basic content up - but its a good idea for the future and we might produce our content in a few other languages. Also if you look at the video description, at the bottom there is a button called "Show Transcript" this will bring the text up in english but you can copy and paste it into google translate or ask chat gpt to translate it for you. - I hope this helps.

You're welcome

Thank you for your comment would love to hear more about your strategy, maybe we can test and produce a video for it.

I saw alot on land casino #3 follow by #8 and any form.. e.x 3=8..3=17.3=26..3=35.. and some others numbers

I now checked the spin 5. It is clear. It is not difficult if you studied the pervious videos. So they said everything what you have to know about this. Check the videos please.

8:00 Look the red circle. We see number 1 at the value (at dozen and at column too) because the last spun number was 1 Number 1 is in the 1st dozen. This means the dozen value is 1 and same with the column. The number 1 is in the column 1. So the column value is 1 If we would like to see number 5 at the "dozen combined" or just simple "combined" (combined means at the dozen: last spun number's dozen value plus the previous spun number's dozen value together) then we have to get 4. But we can not get 4 like the next dozen value because we can get 1 or 2 or 3 only. So if the last spun number's dozen value is 1 and we want a combined 5 then now we can not take a bet. Need wait until the last spun number's dozen value will be at least 2 or more.

4:20 here you can see their roulette betting calculator. He uses these number on the small paper under the coin.

I think dikazdma has maybe answered some of your questions, If you are still having trouble then I would suggest watching Part 1 again first. The numbers we put the coins over are the values of the progression you are following, earlier in the video we made a session plan and you can see we added the progression values to the plan and we suggest that you make some progression templates so you can then use the coins to keep track of where you are on the progression. - I hope this helps.

It will depend on the type of data you are tracking, i.e. probability distribution, geometric, time series trend analysis etc and bet size, you will get very different data patterns between the 18's, 12's, 6's, 4's etc the 18's will pattern up fairly quickly while the 4's need a bit more data to be meaningful. Ultimately its always subjective.

Thank you - glad you found it useful . . .

Thank you - glad you found it useful . . .

Brilliant - Thank you.

There is a lot of talk about that, and videos on other channels showing weird spins or even the ball getting "stuck" in places it shouldn't be able to. There are also demonstrations of people controlling the ball and showing how its done. That said there are many ways to test the "randomness" of spins, we highlight this in our series "Do Casinos Cheat" and particularly in the second half of the 5th episode. ru-vid.com/group/PLYBAFxKWNMKmsj6yHQ2Lqz1x_QGqqdaPA&si=bz_NfjgMy_-ASB-d It seems the "Live" dealer wheels are probably completely controlled, however the results still conform to the expectations of random results which is the most important part of a roulette game controlled or not. You can take any clockwork roulette system and re-play it over hundreds (or thousands) of previously recorded roulette results (or simulated results) so you then know the spins cannot change according to your bet placement and you will still experience wins and losses. It appears its usually the system or the understanding of probability that is the problem not a reputable casino cheating.

If you pause the video and look at the centre of the screen at 31:05 you will see 3 lists of how far each size set of pockets can get to so you are right starting at 15 for the 12's with say 6 progressions to follow (ending on level 21) still only gets you into the high risk category. Starting at loss level 6 would be a bad idea unless of course the outliers in the geometric data offers strong support otherwise.

Good morning, I couldn't understand that lists at 31:05 by the way. 🙄 I did a session yesterday. I used your hidden strategy and my own (what I wanted to send you in an email). The goal wasn't profit nice money. It was a practice only. The unit size was 50p. Starting balance 600 units. During this session own tracker showed that there is 8 numbers (next to each other on the wheel) where the ball didn't land 28 times. I am not a beginner already. So I know that 8 numbers can missing so long too. But I wanted to use this info. So I took units to the line of these numbers. it was 5 lines with 1-1 unit. So not a simple 8 numbers bet. 8 main numbers plus 7 insurance numbers. During this betting period I took bets to dozens/columns if your hidden showed that it could be work. I played at dragonara roulette table what is a land roulette tabel. You know it. People took chips to the table and need wait 1-3 mins between the spinning. So I knew that I will not profit "too much" now but I said, it was a practice session. Of course I covered the zero when I took much units to the table already :) I had to stop this session because of the long of session. 38 units profit.

@@dikazdma I nearly missed your message - the tables at 31:05 show the bet size or number of pockets you are covering - the first table show what we think is high risk so where the red line goes across we are saying there is a high chance of seeing a 12 go beyond level 21, a medium risk of it going beyond level 35 and its about as safe as its gonna get heading for level 50 so if you had 10 level available in your progression/stake then betting on a set of 12 thats only lost 11 times is high risk betting on a set of 12 pockets thats gone 25 times is a medium risk and betting on a set of 12 thats already gone 40 times is low risk. we also suggest in the table for the 18's high risk is level 14 so if you only have 6 progressions available starting at level 8 is high risk and so on . . . we covered all the different bets sizes i.e. for a 3 pocket bet where you have 20 levels available the starting at level 63 is suggested as high risk. In your example of 8 numbers you said they were running at a loss of 28 - we show 8 pockets at level 31 as high risk. We did a video short about this - don't know if you've seen it ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eMtV8H_7uFw.htmlsi=qUYzFc8309QzLU0m

I have saw all of your videos of course. And yes, we have to see these more times. Thank you for your energy and time what you took into this answer. Yes, at my example I have felt that 8 number missing 28 times is not so much. Next to each other or not. It was only (8*2.7%) 21.6% each spin. Only every 5th spin hit a group of 8 numbers long term. So I covered the lines of these numbers and I had 15 covered numbers. Yes, I know the extra 7 numbers were not missing 28 times but (15*2.7%) 40.95% to hit my numbers. The 15 numbers also not 12 numbers. Where we can use the 12 number betting progression. So I had to do this a bit different. But it's ok. I got 1-2 insurance hit on the extra 7 numbers when I could start from the first bet again. About 6-8 spins and the ball landed one of this 8 main numbers.

Your 12 pockets betting progression is not a good progression if we cover less or more numbers. You also know it. So if I just simple cover 8 numbers with 1-1 unit. Levels.......Bet/number.......Bet/spin...........Total cost............return..........profit...........ROI 1 1 8 8 36 28 350% 2 1 8 16 36 18 112.5% 3 1 8 24 36 12 50% 4 1 8 32 36 4 12.5% 5 2 16 48 72 24 50% 6 2 16 64 72 8 12.5% 7 3 24 88 108 20 18.51% 8 4 32 120 144 24 20% 9 5 40 160 180 20 12.5% 10 7 56 216 252 36 16.66% 11 9 72 288 324 36 12.5% 12 12 96 384 432 48 12.5% 13 16 128 512 576 64 12.5% 14 21 168 680 756 76 11.17% 15 28 224 904 1008 104 11.5% 16 38 304 1208 1368 160 13.27% 17 50 400 1608 1800 192 11.94%

Unfortunately our website has been delayed but should be up and running I am told by the end of next week. So please check back soon it will be located here www.roulette-professional.com

No none of the systems we use to play properly work in a live casino as you cant take a laptop or even a mobile phone to the table. Of course you can do a fair bit in your head and maybe get some advantage but if I play in a real casino its just for fun.

Take a picture of the score board , go to the restroom entry the last 20 result, go back to the table place the bet @@roulette-professional

Sorry to hear that. Was you running two stop losses? i.e. did you carry on with the other portion of your bet? Would like to know what your outliers were at? - do you save the spreadsheets? So 4 x 15% = 60% if you were running similar to our example then you should only have lost 50% from one side and still be 10% (not that's any consolation) it is a fairly weak system as we have pointed out, we try and go for 25% per session so the occasional loss is just like a bad day on the trading floor.

Sorry if it hasn't been clear. We spoke against the fallacy because we use patterns in data to predict when something "is due". We tend not to use the term "is due" but rely on probability when those who support the fallacy seem to discard it. There is more information in the video Why Clockwork Roulette Systems Fail ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZIoAvogwaUI.html where we look at geometric data, also the Do Casinos Cheat series contains many examples of where we prove probability is always at work. ru-vid.com/group/PLYBAFxKWNMKmsj6yHQ2Lqz1x_QGqqdaPA

LOL - In fairness the V2 D&C Tracker is a bit boring to play . . . and as humans we are always seeking to find a better solution than the one we just found . . . there are better solutions coming I promise . . .

Same thing happened with me too. I also used another strategy but I was more stupid because I played a land-based casino where was not nobody, only a couple of online players. I lost everything but not the money the problem. The time and the energy what I spent to my bankroll before I did this session. So now I take a break. I designed the probability tracker, I would like to sow it but it is not important for other people I think. I learned that the too small unit size can not save my ass. Important to do short sessions. 📊2-4 wins, take the profit and , 20-40 maximum. If I would like to get £20-£30 during a short session where I use this probability tracker (only 1:2!) then I have to use £5 unit size. Wait to a good entry point and do maximum this 8 levels. The total cost if I go until level 8 is £240, so 10% profit is £24. This means if I must have minimum 10 successful session against 1 losing session. It is not so nice I know... Important to wait enough to the great entry points. No bet, no lose... only the time and energy 🙄 So yes, I also wait your new video what will teach us something better.

Wow, I was wondering when someone would ask that its only taken 3 months. Yes of course, not sure how I could verify it for you though until we are further along with the channel when we will do some higher value demos with more sophisticated systems. So let me put it this way, over 3000 spins about 2-3 weeks of playing I would expect to make about £8k, that might sound laughable as you see people winning more than that on a single spin, however its about what you can get away with, without getting your accounts shut down too often. Of course the last 500 spins played has been for the Do casinos cheat series so we are down about £40 at the moment on that lol. I've also just recorded about 100 spins for the next video called funnelling in which we show just how low a stake you can use to get started so there's not much profit to count there either lol. I haven't actually played seriously for the last few months as I have been busy with other projects including setting this channel up and its been nice to take some time off of it and do something different. You should note though that when any of us do play we use a fairly sophisticated piece of software that utilises many methods at the same time, all of which we are starting to explain in these videos. But obviously its going to take while as this has taken nearly 6 years to develop so far and is always being improved to reduce risk and increase profits in less time.

Appreciate this NO-NONSENSE-LOGICAL reply ! Given a Bank Roll of 100 units n turned into 8000 units in 3 weeks of play = that beats even JIM SIMONS - 60% compounded return annually.. You got my FULL RESPECT for this accomplishment.. say a lot about your methods --- 6 yrs of research paid off handsomely...@@roulette-professional

@@oxdevil who said anything about starting with 100 units??

I assumed/guessed from watching your earlier videos ...@@roulette-professional

​@@roulette-professional Thanks for shared your thinks.

Everything we have done so far is available on our website www.roulette-professional.com

Everything that is available can be found on our website:- www.roulette-professional.com/ TOOLS / DOWNLOADS

Thank you for that yes we are trying to make the headlines as catchy as possible but truthful at the same time even if it is just a play on words!

actually I knew for fact, a winning player in Baccarat from $10K to $30+ millions over few days period, CASINO ( Marina Bay Sands Singapore ) actually encouraged her to continue playing with free penthouse suite , wine n dine, etc... then eventually a few more days later, SHE LOST IT ALL .. tragically she jumped from her penthouse suite n died... TRUE STORY.. So I am baffled why CASINOS want to ban "winning players" especially Roulette where House Edge is significantly HIGHER than Baccarat... also CASINOS always like to HOLD ON to winners in order to WIN BACK all the money later...

@dikazdma, @oxdevil. You have to remember the casinos are profit making businesses and they will address any issues that affect their bottom line. The online and offline versions work very differently both with different issues for the operator to address. Think of the film "21" where there are teams playing black jack inside a live casino and the security employed to route them out, there have been many examples of teams playing inside a casinos all the different games. In the 1970's there was a group of Roulette players who beat roulette using physics with wearable "computers" and roulette has been proven to be beatable in lab conditions using physics, so of course you cannot have your mobile phone out in the casino while playing roulette. This is less of a problem for them online as they do not offer enough view of the wheel spinning before stopping you from placing any more bets. Quite rightly casinos have to protect themselves so their online terms will always disallow players from using advantageous systems, they are of course aware that many players use such systems like the martingale, but they gladly turn a blind eye to that knowing that even if you win big today you will lose bigger tomorrow and so on. While using any form of system is not illegal, the casino reserve the right to ban you for it (or any reason they want - they are not compelled by law to offer you an account or keep your account open, its completely their decision who they trade with as a commercial entity) So if they see you winning on a consistent basis beyond expectation plus whatever tolerance they allow, you will of course find your account gets closed and due to "money laundering laws" you have to identify yourself when opening an online account so of course it gets harder to open new accounts when you have been flagged as an advantage player. Some people have resulted into using friends and family details for opening new accounts but if you get caught that is fraudulent and therefore illegal. There are always a few other work arounds but best not to discuss them in an open forum. There has always been a game of cat and mouse between the house and the player since the beginning of gambling. The online versions which have become technically possible in the last 20 years or so and very popular over the last 10-15 years are similar to the offline versions in the sense the game of cat and mouse will continue on . . .

Based on the above, I can then assume that THEY ARE ROULETTE MASTERS out there who can win at ROULETTE consistently to the point CASINOS are afraid of letting these masters WIN .. a) if so, CASINOS do not rig their roulette wheels as they could easily rig to prevent any of these advantage players from winning... b) if so, these masters ( without using any tools ) could go to many mortal casinos and continue winning $$$$$$ with their Roulette skills ???@@roulette-professional

Advantaged BlackJack card counters - CASINOS ban them But do you know of any ADVANTAGED ROULETTE players ( with the exception of any illegal use of electronic tools or cheat ) that REALLY CAN BEAT THE HOUSE EDGE to the point CASINOS just ban them out of FEAR their NATURAL BRAIN SKILL could win consistently in the game of ROULETTE ?@@roulette-professional

" So if they see you winning on a consistent basis beyond expectation plus whatever tolerance they allow, you will of course find your account gets closed and due to "money laundering laws" you have to identify yourself when opening an online account so of course it gets harder to open new accounts when you have been flagged as an advantage player. " Did someone let the people know how much was his winning (on consistent) when the casino blocked or deleted his account? Do you know any statistic about this? Maybe the casinos basis beyond expectation depends of their monthly income, but I think if someone makes £25 profit each session, does 20 profitable sessions and 2 losing sessions (-£100 per session) monthly, then it's ok for the casinos still. Because it is low monthly cost for the casinos and they thinks that this customer will some back and will lose more sessions. What do you think? " There are always a few other work arounds but best not to discuss them in an open forum. There has always been a game of cat and mouse between the house and the player since the beginning of gambling. " Ok, then I write you a post letter 😉 with my handwriting 😲😄 No. My handwriting is beautiful. But more time and energy. I understand why you write that not good idea to use open forum by the way and I agree with you of course. So I will text you with smoke signal 🔥♨ If a very successful team plays roulette but every member plays only 2 sessions weekly (8-9 sessions monthly), not same place or country, then maybe the casino will not think that they basically one team. This fictional team need have 4 members. They also will not profitable too much. But any long term profit is better like nothing. Goal is they make £300 per member per month. (£300*4) : (8 sessions * 4 members) = £1200 : 32 sessions = average £37.5 per session. Every member plays 2 session weekly, so the weekly average is £75. The problem with this team: if each member plays 2 sessions weekly and makes £75 profit, then why do this with a team? £75 x 4 weeks is £300 The casino will check the member's account 🕵and will see that he made £300 with 8 sessions in this month.... not the number of session the important for the casinos. Need know what is the minimum monthly profit what the casino will ignore still. I don't know any other idea at the moment. 🤷‍♂

Their website is not finish yet. They work on it and will finish soon.

We are based just outside London, UK - The website is www.roulette-professional.com but its just a holding page at the moment - we hope to have the first phase live by the end of the month

@@roulette-professional I also live outside of London, so please :D all in!

All clockwork systems fail eventually it a mathematical certainty and that is topic for our next video - you can only beat roulette with careful analysis and dynamic play methods.

@@roulette-professional what did you mean clockwork system.Oh and remember real fair rulette whell is driven with magic of numbers.So look in that way thats only i can say to you

Using the Fibonacci sequence alone I've made $900 from $100. It was all luck and intuition though. I built up to several hundred before having to bet nearly the whole thing to win the 9th sequence a few times. I have seen dozens not get hit in over 15 goes. Again mostly luck that time. Combining it with this methods (negative progression with these statistics), which he is implying should work long-term (again not fool proof) should increase the player's edge.

Yes we did get a bit carried away with the music in the first few videos, it was a bit experimental being new to video creation - its worse if you have a decent sound-bar attached to the playback device - if you can watch the vid's without amplification - we have toned down the music in later videos and a lot of videos now have no music at all.

Its a great question and there are many reasons, but you could say the same to anyone in any industry, why do chefs share their cooking tips why not just enjoy their own food? and you can apply that to just about anything. Lookup stocks and shares traders, real estate professionals why does anyone share anything??? I could probably produce a whole video around your question and could probably give at least 20 reasons why we are doing this - here's a few . . . In the book 7 habits of highly effective people (Stephen Covey RIP) one of the first things he suggests is when you learn something, learn it like you are going to teach it (and then teach it!) it certainly absorbs you into the subject much deeper. (Why not try the same yourself? - if you become good enough to teach roulette to others you would improve your own game!) Albert Einstein - "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough." You can only get so far with family and friends before you bore them to death - RU-vid is a great platform to put yourself out there and be scrutinized - there are plenty of maths geeks and roulette aficionados out there to challenge us, if we are unable to answer a question then its an area for research. We have a had a few good thought provoking questions since we started this channel, and it has helped us in many ways in continuing our research. We often get asked have we really beat roulette - well you need to define what that would look like. So if you could accurately predict the next number for every spin then you could say you have beaten roulette, anything less is room for improvement - do we think we could ever achieve that? No of course not, but you can be profitable without reaching that level, however, never say never, always say always! Think about the approach taken by Coca-Cola one of the worlds biggest brands:- One of the company's well-known goals is to ensure that Coca-Cola products are within "an arm's reach of desire," which means they aim to effectively place a Coke within close proximity to everyone on the planet. This goal highlights Coca-Cola's extensive distribution network and their focus on global market penetration. So the point we are making is, set a massive goal, our goal is to be the worlds best roulette players, producing the worlds best roulette channel, when you have a clear destination its easier to navigate to it. We have studied many of the worlds most successful people they all talk about multiple income streams - yes we can play and profit from roulette - but why be a one-trick pony? The most successful people in life provide value to others usually by sharing their expertise if their respected field(s). One or ours happens to be Roulette. It started off similar to how you suggest i.e. just about making money for ourselves, now it has become a passion to succeed in every area of it. So establishing expertise in any area of life brings along many opportunities, but you have to establish that expertise first, giving away knowledge for free is a great way to start, are we going to give everything away for free, err- no! That just means the really good stuff is still come, but we are not like the Christopher Mitchells of the world, trying to charge £1199 to join his inner circle, we will be providing tools and training along the way for like £10/month cancel anytime - so like our systems, we want to provide low risk high return value to the masses. Mitchells idea was find a few mugs to fund his lifestyle. Being a professional gambler (or calculated risk taker as we prefer) is no different to a commodities trader but they are respected and gamblers mistrusted, but the benefits of providing value to others for free brings far more back in return. 1) We increase our own knowledge and perfect our systems. 2) We may earn from RU-vid views (currently its a lot less than its costing us but that might change) 3) Other Advertising, endorsements, recognition, sponsorship and opportunities. 4) Its fun, its creative, its interesting and gives us a sense of purpose, a mission, there's only so much roulette you can play in solitude. I could easily double that list. but I hope this gives you some insight. Successful people have an abundance mindset, sharing knowledge with others doesn't take anything away from ourselves. Thank you for the great question, I'm sure many want to ask the same. Best Regards RP

How old are you now? lol

49 🤣@@roulette-professional

wow ... someting was good at your first session or? 🤔 ... or you just try to get back that money still?

It depends on how you ask the question. If you said what is the chance of seeing 23 win 3 times in a row then its 1/37^3 which means first there is a 1 in 37 chance of getting 23, then there is another 1 in 37 chance of getting it a second time and a 1in 37 chance of getting it a third time so 37x37x37 = 50653 you can expect to see a specific number repeat 3 times only once in every 50653 spins. Now on the other hand if you are not being specific and ask the question past tense by saying I've just seen 35 land 3 times what are the chances of that then its different as you might of made the same remark about any triple. So if you don't care about what number it is but just want to know what's the chance of seeing a triple then we can remove the specific starting point so you are down to 1/37^2 which is 37*37 meaning you are likely to see a triple occur once in every 1369 spins you observe. I think that is what you were asking?

@@roulette-professional Sort of. I looked back into a history of live (lightning) roulette (last500) and saw 2 zero's on a vertical I betted on a triple zero vertical (so there's about 13 spins between) and it hit 0.

A few people have said that - There seems to be an issue depending on what equipment you are listening to the video on - we are somewhat new to video production - when we record a video we check the levels - when played on an iPhone or computer with standard speakers it seems fine until you play it on a TV with soundbar or similar it somehow amplifies the music disproportionate to the voice over. We are looking into this and trying to find a solution that works across all devices:- The issue with the audio levels varying between different playback devices, such as a computer and a TV with a soundbar, is likely due to the differences in how these devices process and output sound. Here are a few potential reasons for this discrepancy: Dynamic Range Compression: TVs and soundbars often have built-in dynamic range compression (DRC) settings that can boost quieter sounds (like background music) and reduce louder sounds (like dialogue). This can make the music seem louder relative to the voiceover. Equalization Settings: Soundbars and TVs might have different equalization (EQ) settings compared to your computer. Soundbars often enhance bass and treble frequencies to create a more cinematic sound, which can amplify the background music. Audio Channels: If your video has multiple audio channels (e.g., stereo or surround sound), different devices might handle them differently. A computer might play all channels at an equal level, while a TV or soundbar might emphasize certain channels more, affecting the balance between music and dialogue. Audio Mixing: The way you mix your audio might be optimized for computer speakers, which are typically less powerful than TV speakers or soundbars. What sounds balanced on computer speakers might not translate well to more powerful audio systems. Solutions to Consider Normalize Audio Levels: Ensure that your audio is normalized, meaning the volume levels are consistent throughout the video. Use tools like LUFS (Loudness Units relative to Full Scale) to measure and adjust the loudness of your tracks. Test on Multiple Devices: Test your video on multiple playback devices during the editing process. This can help you identify and correct imbalances before finalizing your video. Adjust EQ and Compression: During the mixing process, apply EQ and compression to ensure that the voiceover remains clear and at the forefront. Consider using a multiband compressor to control the dynamics of different frequency ranges separately. Voiceover Ducking: Use ducking to automatically lower the background music volume when the voiceover is playing. This ensures that the voiceover remains intelligible regardless of the playback device. Limit Dynamic Range: Consider limiting the dynamic range of your audio. This can prevent large variations in volume, making it easier for all elements of the audio to be heard clearly on different devices. Check Audio Output Settings: Verify and adjust the audio output settings on your TV and soundbar. Some soundbars have settings that allow you to prioritize dialogue over background sounds. By considering these factors and making adjustments during the audio production process, you can achieve a more consistent audio experience across different playback devices.

Ahh you are talking about compounding, that would be nice but the casinos will simply close your account if you seem to be winning too much, in fact even if you just win small amounts each day, they are monitoring your lifetime total deposits and withdrawals so by the time you have burned all the casino accounts you can open you'll only be a few hundred grand up. I'm wondering if you got that idea from Christopher & Stacy Mitchells book, The Millionaire Blueprint - I say book, I mean blank diary. Their brainwave was to convince everyone you can turn $100 into £1,000,000 in less than a year, I mean the math is sound and for some it might sound plausible, but in reality its ridiculous and even worse its still for sale on amazon!! Firstly his method was to use the martingale system and at one point he was promoting the "Mitchellgale" system which was to treble-up on 24 numbers - this is why we mentioned the 24 Pocket system in the video at about 21:56. The "GOAT" as he calls himself, his mastermind method was to start with $100 and make 3% per day and compound it. Day 1 your profit target is $3.00, Day 50 its about $12.00 per day by the time you get to Day 250 you need to be making about $5000 per day, by Day 275 its about $10,000 per day and by Day 300 its over $20,000 per day. A lot of people called him a scammer, I think he genuinely believed he could do it and started filming himself for the first few days . . . but we are talking about someone who in one of his very early day videos likened his own intelligence of gambling to that of Einstein when he invented the light bulb, I mean that says it all. As for wasting time making RU-vid videos, ask Bezo's, Zuckerberg, Gate's, Buffett and Musk and all the other billionaires you can think of why they still rock up to work every day. Life's not just about money.

THANK for a detailed reply. The Goat is just a scammer - his BLANK NOTEBOOK is another scam of his to suck money out of naive n half brain blind sheep. 3% compounded daily = 48K times return ON PAPER. That is why I "laugh" at all the YT strategies that claim winning of 10-30% of BankRoll every session...even 0.3% daily is already IMPOSSIBLE , and these folks looking for 10-30% return on BANKROLL EVERY SESSION ! @@roulette-professional

CASINOS ban advantage players in BlackJack and SPORT,... have you ever heard of ADVANTAGED PLAYERS in ROULETTE that CASINOS need to BAN ??? I mean ROULETTE supposed to be IMPOSSIBLE to gain any advantage ?? Please enlighten me if you know of any ROULETTE player being banned from CASINOS ?? other than fraudulent acts such as past posting in land casinos...@@roulette-professional

@@roulette-professional well done for this answer

Amazing analysis! Thank You for creating and sharing your knowledge! Now on to check out your website.

There are things what is worth more then money. But my question is this. If everybody can see this video then the casino also can see this and understand it. And makes their probability distribution tracker. So they also can study it and use this knowhow to see how the roulette player wins. ... So these hidden patterns will not hidden for far already.

Ahh - Oxdevil, - If I was allowed a list of favourite viewers you would definitely be on it lol - I will reply properly on one of you other comments but I have to put something here as if we dont reply it wont clear out of the control panel

@@dikazdma I think the casinos already know all about this and much much more . . .

LOL - Thank you for that . . .

Your welcome - thank you for watching . . .