Hitler's Insane Train 

Missed opportunity.

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

Thomas' bad brother

that's so real

Pendolino trains in the Czech Republic (operated by České Dráhy) actually have a mustache on the front 🤣

Aren't all rooms floor to ceiling?

But the wood paneling wasn’t FSC-certified, unlike today‘s sponsor Holzkern

@@Chomp-Rock If you believe in yourself enough.

@@Halbmond If you believe it, it's real

@@Chomp-Rockthey mean it covers the span of the whole train instead of leading to another floor. From the bottom of the train to the top, not from the bottom of the train to the second floor.

It isn't surprising, since the author behind this channel is himself german, having started there firstly

​@@AlexVasiluta you can hear from the word "Reich" that the voiceover-artist isn't german, but from the netherlands, but it's a very minor thing :)

@@lit_for_20 shoot, you're right, I just noticed this channel is a collab channel with someone else

it’s very noticeable that they are trying to pronounce the german words in an americanized way here, even tho they themselves speak german. It’s a little baity but hey, what can you do

Dein's auch? ^^

i was looking for this comment haha

that name sounds familiar, is that a train or something

@@spingleboygle it's a series, it has 3 seasons, worth watching

@@spingleboygle A fictional one, but yes

​@@アナスマルディnah its a mid series based on a masterpiece of a movie

Without miss engel even more

Imagine a Wolfenstein game set on this train.

Wolfenstein: the New Order mission on the train comes to my mind

@@abdullahchhab2325 Missed that game, should probably add it to my list.

@@qers How could you. The first one of the reboot is great (the new order), the dlc too. The second one (The New Colossus) is also pretty good, but i like it less then the first one. Every thing after II is not worth playing.

Same for Putin and Rocket Man

Didn't know that, but it makes a lot of sense actually. From a dictators point of view, that is. Why wouldn't you want people to build an unrealistic, oversized train, just because you don't like to fly?

And his use of only one pilot except upon one single occasion

@@acrylique2976 trains are safer than planes, look what happened to prigozhin, this has nothing to do with whatever you think it does.

Makes no Sense, He traveled around in Germany a Lot with a Junkers 52

look up ten t

That’s what they’re planning/designing for Ontario rn

Agreed. We need more high-speed rail covering Europe of the likes in France. There, you make it from Paris to Bordeaux in less than 2 hours! (6 hours by car).

@@vinvenus4581 Hey, it's not too late!

@@vinvenus4581 Yeah especially between larger European cities (from which point you can take local trains to smaller towns.). They should also be part operated by governments, so you don't have to pay more than a flight (also, flying should not be tax-exempt).

The train would be called the Super Eurostar...

I mean, kinda feel like regardless of it's engineering. Prolly would have been melted into scrap circa 1946. Don't see a lot of 770K mercede's about anymore....for some reason.

Today it would be converted to something similar to economy class on planes. Means that carts for Eastern workers would be modified to accommodate more people. And that food would also become more budget-efficient. ;)

He got a letter from an acclaimed art critic praising his art. Going after your dreams and not 'making it' at the most elite level is nothing to be ashamed of!

@@YellowPenisi’m dead that you’re standing up for hitler here 💀

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

@@YellowPenisi’m dead that you’re standing up for hitler here 💀

😂 Proud to be your 3rd comment!

E‎

The "slave part" is not different from modern trains. It's just worse than the rest of the luxruious train. I would leave it.

Well, ever heard about the autobahn?

​@@igors1234You think modern trains are run by slaves or something.

@@CountingStars333 "slave part" is just a name, you can name it whatever you want. You should judge the interior.

For real, it scares me how far AI has gotten

Facts​@@mrLeL-vo1on

no no no, *”work* slaves”!!! Completely different. Just your regular train company employees… who happen to be slaves

fr

Why should I care because there my slaves

Not much different than buying cheap shit from China, is it?

Well not so hard to imagine tbh when similar things are happening in countries like the UAE. People will just avert their eyes and let themselves be diverted by the splendour of the rest.

E

E@@EEEEEEEE

True

Kis@ss

Almost like it was designed by a guy that thought he could rule the world..

"NEIN NEIN NEIN!! Vee need a trunk for at least 10 work slaves back there! And add a bathroom!"

On a par with a Boris Johnson vanity project😁

They were planning on building a tank called 'Monster' which was basically little different than an oversized Ratte. He would have liked monster trucks but he would find them underarmored. And if Knight Rider would have been a thing back then he would have outfitted his monster truck with bombs so that his jumping, armored monster truck could also divebomb.

With germany's nationalization, it would maybe cost a couple of billion, nothing insane about it

the problem about democracy and capitalism, abitious projects are way too slow and have too many hurdles, especially when their benefit is only long-term

It is work for countless people. Those People spend Money, and so is the Cycle. Not like today where Corporation suck up all the money, and poof.. it's gone, and the workers find themself in an new Company with with a new Name, but the same faces as before..

If governments prioritized their money it wouldn't be an issue

There are many issues with this train - which is why it wasn't built while other engineering advancements from the Nazi era were adopted and further developed. That alone should tell you that it is not "highly practical". Because, in engineering, if something is "highly practical", it gets adopted regardless of the political ideology where it originated. First thing is, a train system like that would require the entire continent of Europe agreeing to build it. If you know anything about Europe, that's the first thing that is your problem. Which is why Hitler planned for it when the entire Europe was his and all decisions for the continent were to be made in his office. In a world where Europe has even semi-independent states, you won't have an agreement for something like this because some regions would benefit, others won't - so no agreement. Next, money. I see in the comments that people live in an illusion that Nazi economic system wasn't capitalist, that it was somehow different from modern greedy corporations and how they do things. That is nonsense. Nazi economy was hyper-capitalist and their companies (which were private btw) were no less predatory than the worst ones from USA today. They just further used the political connections to form even greater monopolies. Money for a project like this would come out of the pocket of a German worker and then flow into the private pockets of greedy corporations and, in large part, Nazi party itself. For example, all slaves that were used... were not a free labor force. Corporations in Germany that were using them had to pay SS directly (there was a complete list of prices for various categories of slave workers) because those slaves were EXCLUSIVELY SS property. And SS in turn filled the party wallet. In Germany during the war, SS was one of the biggest and most profitable corporations because of it. So in a normal system, you pay a worker, and that worker then spends the money in the economy. In Nazi system, you don't own a slave (so workforce is free) nor do you pay a free worker (who then spends the money in the economy) you are paying another corporation to provide you with the workforce, that is not able to spend that money back in the economy. It was a scheme to enrich the party and its heads fast, it was never supposed to be a long term viable solution. They all knew it was extremely flawed. It was a "get rich fast" model, not "let's build a better Germany" model. Even before the onset of war, Germany was effectively bankrupt (when the president of Reichsbank warned about that, they removed him) and internal debt collection was postponed during the war. When planning expansion, Hitler and his cabinet talked first about "small wars of plunder" before the big confrontation with USSR and Allies - they knew already in 1937-1938 that German economy is going bust and that they need to plunder neighboring countries to keep it all going. In short, there was never economic system in place that would make decade(s) long project actually possible in the peace time. And then comes the question of practicality. Let us say that you DID solve previous issues. The entire Europe agrees (either you own it all, or they magically agree) and you have the money ready to build it. Then what? It was planned to travel only between very few big cities, with little to no stops between them. You could build their tracks next to adjacent ones, no problem - but you'd still need the entire capillary network of regular trains going from those few major hubs. And can you be sure that you will always fill the entire train? If not, then there is a bigger delay between departures - by which point you'd opt for a smaller train anyway. Simply put, you already had infrastructure in place which was WAAAAY more flexible, working and is economically viable. And you want to add basically 2 or 3 lanes (let's say 2 tracks each) of huge trans-continental railway when there is no need. Instead of that one big train, you can have 4 smaller ones - much better, more flexible, modular, it has existing infrastructure through the entire continent, reaching all the places already... All in all, if there was ever ANY practical use for a train like this, you'd have seen it developed since at least somewhere in the world, or at least someone would have had something similar on their design board. The fact that no one ever did should drive you to ask the question "Why?". Because, while it looks impressive, and while some of you may have sympathies for a certain Austrian man, he wasn't that smart (at least not when engineering is concerned) and there is almost 100 years of engineering practice since, all over the world, and no one ever saw this and said "Oh, how great and highly practical concept, let's develop it further!". Not a single one. Every engineer and public/mass transport engineer who sees this concept is immediately "Hell no!", regardless of whether you tell them it is a "Nazi train" or not.

and it matches up perfectly with H1tler's disappointed expression.. holding his train like "why can't we have this, mama👉👈"

Yep

Yeah that would be awsome

It would be like a cruise but it's a train going all over Europe

I’m still processing tbh Wikipedia says it was a popular haircut back then?

@@Halbmond nazi haricut

@@Halbmondyes. And still is. Or is again for the last decade or so

@@annarosa865 why would it suffer during the journey? I still don’t get it

That was supposed to pass for a joke? What even is an undercut?

marsey

marsæ

@@REMPLACEMENT-TV-2 marsey and versey no?

@@fixu-in6pmVersay, with the ending like the pirate greeting, I think

Marcy and Jefferson.

womp womp

I don't think the point here was to show how long it is... It was most likely supposed to emphasize the massive width and, primarily, height of the Breitspurbahn, which is unmatched by any other standard train today.

​​@@hoppel9177did you just say "womp womp" about a little train taken from it's mother? How dare you!

@@nemes.tamas.21 they talked about the length literally the sentence before that. The length absolutely was a factor in this comparison

@@felixw19 So did they literally give the measurements for the width and height. Even the sentence immediately before specifically mentions that it's a double decker. An ICE could easily fit INSIDE the Breitspurbahn.

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

Yess!

True

Nah

Running > Train

Suddenly I imagine Hitler as one of those “train guys” who get home from work, put on their cute lil conductor hat & play with model trains all night

train=

dumb joke ngl

Nobody: Literally nobody: Not even one person: No one:

insane in the aryan train

plus digging gigantic tunnels and building extra wide bridges because the old ones would be too small

This channel is made by @Simplicissimus and @Hogh. Hogh is the one who speaks.

@@BLXODi think he was referring to the AI generated voice of hitler and the other people in the video that he used , not the narrator

@@BLXOD i guess they mean at 6:22 Also i agree, giving historic figures a voice is really cool

Is it though? I'm not opposed to the use of AI here, but it could've just as well've been done by a paid human voice actor (and maybe they would've done better).

​@@DueySRit was noted in the video, its AI

whats ur point xD

In german they have. Even a BIG project called "Putins Bears" in cooperation with a german TV Channel

Oh I just found they did upload the Video about Putins Bears on the german channel "funk". It has subtitles but I have no idea how good they are. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-QSVQR_7fAFQ.html

yes, it would be great if we developed interrail as one but that won't happen anytime soon for example austrian railways (öbb) is hating on hungarian railways (máv) because máv is terrible, always late and if they were connected, öbb trains would be late too

digging giant tunnels through the alps sounds pretty stupid, even normal sized tunnels cost a lot

Average dictator. The amount of insane projects and things done just because dictators are greedy and childish is quite big.

There is an additional problem: a wider track requires larger curve radii to maintain comfort and prevent the trains from derailing, it's the same logic behind the choice of narrow-gauge railways in areas with difficult terrain where curves must be sharp. A 3m wide track would have required enormous curves; this would have been okayish in the mostly flat lands of Germany and Northeastern Europe, but a nightmare to build elsewhere. Crossing mountain ranges like the Alps, Pyrenees or Carpathians would have been outright impossible with such a track design.

a lot fo trains in the uk through the early 1900's up to about 1960/1970 had carriages where people would sit facing each other it was standard practise back then

when cars are separated into these room things, seats always face each other (think about harry potter for example)

germans were supposed to spread and populate the world which you can't do without females so probably no

I think he only uses male models

If this train was a freight train, it would have been the most efficient type of transport for carrying freight

We'd need good leadership to build good things. Not gonna happen.

I´m part of a group that pushing a rail transport solution with similar but updated performance. Its built on a already existing rail system with tweaks to power supply and loading gauge. The original loading guage is 4x4.2 meter. It planed to be expanded to 5x6 meter. (so basically a meter shy in both direction). Trails would be up to 500 meters long Having it wider would actually make sens. 5 meter wide is a bit to shy of two full cabin width. The issue is that the system its built on have problem supporting wider trains. A primary night route on plan now would be Helsinki to Athens, with a later Oslo-Neapel, that both routes would take about 10-11 hours with a fairly low speed (the track would primary used for local transport and express fright daytime). That would later be intended as a collector route for a much longer Asian route. We are quite a few years into the future, and working under the assumption that the situation in Russia and China would chill down by then. One possible endpoint could be Singapore with a possible 5 hour connection to Perth in Australia that would allow people to go from Europe to Austria with a nice coshy sleeper train majority of the way. The economics of the European routs is actually surprisingly solid. The problem is that the first link is very expensive to build. But there after it will be cheaper and cheaper. When a handful of links are built the track would generate more cash than it cost. So we are basically poking different government to spend the money to built the first link. Well.. let me say it this way. Nobody want to be first, everyone want to be second. Got the response from multiple transport agencies in multiple countries that if we built it to there border from a outer country, they are interested in building there part. Nobody want to build the first section. The Europe to Asia part got a bit more iffy economics. But there are people working on solving it.

actually there is plenty luxurious trains out there, we are just too poor to use them :D look it up in youtube if you like.

I thought 6 bunk cabin was standard everywhere,

@@matsv201 it very well may be, but I daresay the cabin was smaller than average...very cramped! Especially when you're sharing with strangers

@@dancoroian1 If i don´t miss remember, the Romanian trains are license produce Swedish trains, so they are probobly basically identical to the one we got here. I know the locos are, but i think you have some of the same carages as well. The 6 bunk is of cause 2:n class, the 1st class one is 2 or 3. Those are really nice

@@dancoroian1 yea.. they are really tiny. I use to ride them a lot when I was a kid. Only once when I was a adult.. and it was really cramped. The beds are so narrow I can't even turn around. But when I was a kid it was fantastic. Whent on a 24 hour ride to the other side of the coutry when I was 24 with a yourth group. Greate time.

No sh1t 🤦🏼 it's a video explaining the vision of this train 😂

Trains can transport large amounts of troops and supplies to new areas quickly and stations are major logistics hubs. The only was to fight back if you don't own your own train might be guerrilla warfare, cutting up track sections and running away. But that requires tools and being able to reach the terrain. During the Russian Civil War, the Red Army ultimately won by taking back control of the Trans-Siberian Railway from the White Army.

Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell Come to Jesus Christ today Jesus Christ is only way to heaven Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today Holy Spirit Can give you peace guidance and purpose and the Lord will John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Mark 1.15 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Hebrews 11:6 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Jesus