How a few scientists transformed the way we think about disease - Tien Nguyen 

+jared tillman Right? The animation was cleeeean

+jared tillman Please read the descriptions, they are always usefull.

yeah, they design of the characters looks very good too,I dont know why,but it remind me a little bit to jojo's

+piluex2 *the

jared tillman y

damn

hey don’t kink shame

@@potatok123 true true HAHAH

Coca cola was not yet invented 😣

Wasn't that the entire plot theme of the award winning highly acclaimed film 2 girls 1 cup ?

Malaysia, a muslim country in the Asia Pacific. I'm a Chinese and also an atheist so I'm quite the minority here. My parents, friends and schools are not very supportive of critical thinking.

+Kar Weng Hungary - Atheist the country has many kinds of different peaceful religions - only the goverment is pushing it a bit in talks the scool system is set up over trivial knowledge - and has little to negative funding altho in many places the scools are alright, and there are private level but govermental (free for the best - we get you in if youre good) ones, but a lot of them are just barely ok oh yes, and discrimination against gypsies - almost forgot that one... a lot of them just didnt blend in at all

+Kar Weng It did not used to be that way. the bible was part of the education system also. We have seen what happened in that category. Asking a question is frowned upon 99% of the time now in schools. Mainly, new teachers are not taught what they need to know in the subjects they teach. Look at Math, by the time kids are in middle school, they are so dependent on calculators, they can not do their math facts (multiplication facts of two one digit numbers) without one.

+Lorie Franceschi The Bible still is part of the educational system in my country, the United States. If you want your child to learn about the Bible in school, you have the perfect right to send your child to a parochial school. The Churches who run them don't even have to pay taxes. But in my country, the United States, we have a set of laws, called the Constitution, which prohibits the government from getting into the religion business. So governments cannot fund public schools which promote religion and therefore public schools promote no religion of any kind. That's what religious schools are for. If you cannot afford to send your child to a religious school or you do not have access to a religious school that you would want your child to attend, you can always have your child learn about the Bible at Church or at home - parents and homes are part of your children's education too! It's my understanding that some organizations hand out the "Good Book" for free. At home and at Church is where most people learned about the Bible for most of history since the Bible was canonized. That's where *I* learned about the Bible and I think it's a perfectly fine place to learn about the Bible. Bibles in schools are a relatively new invention.

+Edwin Luciano My statement was about the public education system. The teaching of evolution was frowned upon for most of our country's life. It was not until the 1958 National Defense Education Act signed by President Eisenhower. this Act came about because our federal elected leaders were afraid that the USA was falling behind the USSR in education. I do not need to be told that I could send my children to a religious school. I do not need to be told that I am responsible for teaching my children the morals that are taught in the Bible. Please be so kind to get off your high horse about telling me what i need to do with my children. You are not part of my family and really have no say as to what I teach my children. Besides the "NE" generation, telling people how to raise their children is part of the problem we have today in this country. Good Day.

They actually said that!

BURN THEM ALL

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

+StephanDRX God damnit... you beat me to it.

You made my day :D

+Nereid He beat me to it too

+StephanDRX The city council was like "You know nothing, John Snow."

+StephanDRX It's Jon Snow

+Nereid As a side note, the animation for this was really well done. :)

Well, we can't blame the conservative scientists at that time as well. because to them, the miasma theory was already common sense and germ theory was just another hypothesis that is trying to challenge this age old "infallible" theory. the people of today may find it odd why people back then would believe that, but thats only because now the germ theory is what our generation call common sense. but yeah, gotta feel sorry for Snow.

+Nereid Well, nobody have seen the whitewalkers for ages, and wildlings were a constant enemy thorugh ages. No wonder Snow had a hard time appealing to the council.

+Paweł Wolnicki dude. you just blew my mind

+Paweł Wolnicki Brilliant X'D

Yes, even more relevant right now. If it weren't for investigating the so-called science of viruses as a result of this Covid I would have been none the wiser.

@@andrewkendall7814 you clearly are scientifically literate

Germ theory is not the most accepted one right now... But it was the earliest theory that made some sense... Hence the video..

@@aadithyanarayanan2978 i definitely still is the most accepted. how do you think this video in any way shows that it isn't?

There are [Theories: germs cause sickness], and then there are [Facts: if you stop breathing nitrogen/oxygen, you perish]

+flensdude | pTarian you know ..something.. john snow. *dies*

+flensdude | pTarian Why does the joke writes itself? I'm sure you are referring to the phrase "You know nothing, Jon Snow". Even if he didn't discover the cholera bacteria he was a supporter of the germ theory and was so much on the right track on finding out what causes the Cholera disease. It's just the authorities that were to stubborn to believe him. Unfortunately Dr. John Snow died at the age of 45 by a stroke. He probably would have proven his theory himself (not Robert Koch) if life would have given him a little more time :(

+FatNonsense ok ill wrote it for you. John snow :" disease is caused by germs!" city officials "you know nothing John snow "

FatNonsense the joke is alluding to a known quote. quotes are essentially established in the past so knowing the quote means your memory writes the joke by association.

r/woooosh?

I think that's a thought crime don't ya know? 😉

Read the invisible Rainbow, Good Bye Germ Theory and The Contagion Myth and find out.

Our descendants will see religion, fossils fuels, and our financial systen as anti progression

Asking questions when the answer is obvious and empirically evident would naturally invite ridicule unless ofcourse its proven true in hindsight.

@@alexanderphilip1809 Good job rationalizing ridicule of scientific inquiry! You are DEFINITELY the cream of the lot. I'd like to see your empirical evidence and obvious answers, before you go ahead and laugh at anyone but yourself, though. Since the public has barely any way of confirming anything the authorities on the matter say, it becomes a subject of faith, rather than science, if ya ask me.

@@SevScout I'd prefer Science over Faith.

@@SevScout wasnt advocating for rationalizing stupidity or blind faith. You fail to see my point and what i said was a mere observation and in noway a rebuke of "asking questions". The fact that we were watching this video now shows that we were looking for answers which would require us to figure out the questions to ask in the first place.Unless ofcourse this was recommended.

@@alexanderphilip1809 Yeah, so you didn't address my point. Which is, due to not being able to first hand confirm any of the empirically evident/obvious answers, the basis of your knowledge IS faith based. You BELIEVE the authorities that you BELIEVE IN. Address an actual point for a change, instead of dodging with what equates to corporate speech!

Read 'Béchamp or Pasteur A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology' by Ethel Hume

last words are always extremely insightful. sure...

@@alexkaapa Lamentations of a fraudster coming clean in his last moments

@@vilieatthefarm1703 A work of propaganda is not insightful in any way, it is just a prejudicial diatribe. "Hume's book has been cited by proponents of alternative medicine but was criticized by historians." "In 1924, a review in the Nature journal commented that "the solid fact remains that most of [Béchamp's] work has been discredited as inaccurate, and although he wrote an immense amount, he plunged deeper and deeper into error. However high the opinion of the author is on the virtues of Bechamp, he has utilised a fair part of the book to exploit his own antimicrobic and antivaccination views." In 1928, William Fearon stated that the book "is written in a somewhat peevish style, and appears to be more concerned with the defects of Pasteur than the merits of Bechamp". In 1934, a review in The Quarterly Review of Biology dismissed the book as a "bit of anti-vivisection and anti-vaccination propaganda". A review in the Isis journal the same year, described the book as an attack upon Pasteur and to discredit vaccination. The review concluded that "the emotional basis, the intellectual feebleness, and the anti-scientific and anti-social character of the whole anti-medical movement is superbly illustrated in the motivation and in the pseudo-scientific and ofttimes painfully unintelligent content of this subsidized book of propaganda."" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Douglas_Hume#:~:text=In%201924%2C%20a,book%20of%20propaganda.

damn just to late :'(

lol

+Harshdeep Khurana You beat me to it, god damnit

+Harshdeep Khurana he knew something! (at least)

Gonna say this

they are a corrupt hoax to put people in fear at a mass level (DON'T TOUCH THAT, IT COULD MAKE YOU SICK AND DIE)

Religions.

Just about all of them.

Has any of these "Viruses" occurred in modern times among healthy environments? Small Pox and Measles vaccines arrived at the nadir the said "viruses" Viruses NONE of them....have been scientifically "isolated" purified and passed on to healthy hosts for infection. NONE. Unless you change the definition of vaccine and virus.....Germ Theory FAILS to thrive

Antibiotic resistance is a growing problem, neither are vaccines very efficacious at creating antibodies and preventing disease transmission. Human health is deteriorating year after year. I can’t see the success.🤷‍♀️

@@SC-gw8np I see the success in the century where death by infectious disease collapsed and we eradicated smallpox.

@@SC-gw8np also you got any studies that support the claim about vaccines? And I was unaware that literally everywhere the upward trend in lifespan reversed.

@@paulmahoney7619 There’s no consensus among scholars that infectious disease was eradicated due to antibiotics alone. Better sanitation and housing was a huge factor, which is why infectious diseases still prevail in underdeveloped regions like parts of Africa.

What medical revolutions has Terrain Theory created? Has it created anything that has saved as many lives as antibiotics?

@@paulmahoney7619 antibiotics lol. Antibodies are the creation of big pharm to create customers like the sheeples. You don’t sell the drug, you sell the disease. - George Merck, Founder of Merck Pharmaceuticals

@@jaenyc263 you haven’t answered my question. What life-saving innovations have been developed using terrain theory. Diseases like tuberculosis had effective treatments developed for the first time with the help of Germ theory and antibiotics. Smallpox was eradicated with vaccines and germ theory. Name me one disease for which we got an effective treatment, cure, or prevention for that was successfully and consistently deployed like the smallpox vaccine or tuberculosis treatments. Give me actual, peer-reviewed, clinically-studied, practical treatments. You can moan on and on about what pharmaceutical companies do, but if you can’t treat with terrain theory what you can with germ theory, then it’s fairly obvious what we should use.

@@paulmahoney7619 if u asking in what way terrain theory helped develop innovations then u don’t understand what terrain theory is. The robust human body has the most evolved immune system which adapts and reinforces when encountering foreign substances. The body does not need any foreign substances such as antibiotics, vaccines, etc. The system has programmed the sheeples to be even scared of their own shadow lol. I was born at home never been inoculated ever with any substance and still ticking at 48 yrs. Clean the fish bowl but don’t jab the fish. Pasteur has renounced the germ theory and admitted that his rival was right all along…saying ‘The microbe is nothing, the terrain is everything’.

@@jaenyc263 and yet, for millennia the biggest killers included bacterial infection from when we had good diets as hunter-gatherers to the invention of antibiotics and infectious diseases like smallpox which killed three hundred million people in the twentieth century alone. Tell them that all they need is to clean their metaphorical tanks, not medicine. If infectious disease is not a killer, why have measures developed based on the theory that they are worked so well? If terrain theory was accurate, someone somewhere would use it to do something useful since that’s the point of science.

How is that so? The video is just presenting facts.

+Merry Machiavelli The last line in the video gave me the same impression. The whole "which theories that are accepted today are crap?" question suggests that there may be big reversals in commonly accepted theories. I think it was Richard Feynman who said that keeping an open mind was good but no so open that your brains fell out.

Throughout history we have been learning that our beliefs are wrong all the time. What are the odds that at exactly this time in history we have come a point where almost everything we know is true? That has never been the case and I doubt that it suddenly is. We can still use our models of reality as long as they predict what we see, but we have to be ready to accept new models if they are more accurate than the old ones.

+Lukas Berglund I'm not a historian but I know that for a long time in the Western world what was "true" about the natural world was "true" because of what authorities on the subject said was "true." Then Galileo came along and turned the way we found out what was "true" on its head. So it's no surprise to me that many things we believed in the past, especially before the Scientific Revolution are now shown to be false, because the way we find out what's true and false changed thanks to the Scientific Revolution. But as we make our way into a scientific way of looking at nature (I know Dr John Snow lived centuries after Galileo) I think it's going to be harder and harder to do what Dr Snow did: change the way everybody thought about a widely accepted natural occurrence. I say that with the knowledge that many people still believe that you catch a cold if you don't bundle up in the winter. Old ideas die hard. But scientists know and accept that it is a viral infectious disease that just happens to be more common in winter for a host of reasons.

Today it's been more a good 400 years since the Scientific revoluton, but it's been shown that everything we believed in physics a hundred years ago is wrong through quantum physics. A core philosophy of rationality is that nothing can be known for sure. As Stephen Hawking said in a brief history of time: "Any theory is always provisional, in the sense that it is only a hypothesis: you can never prove it. No matter how many times the results of experiments agree with some theory, you can never be sure that the next time the result will not contradict the theory." Of course some theories work so well that you don't have to consider them being untrue when using them, but we shouldn't repeat the mistake shown in the video and refuse to consider a countertheory when there is evidence for it.

Isn't this vdeo decribing terrain theory??

011azr the reason the scientific method is the way it is is because it insures only repeatable results are confirmed. They have not considered the supernatural because no claim has passed the Method.

Lord Inquisitor Yeah, I know. I'm a computer science undergraduate, but I really hope that the non physical things can be observed. I swear to God, I've seen a lot of things beyond the scope of things that can be sensed. I've experienced how real the kundalini in yoga is and how real it is to be able to manipulate other people subconscious mind to like me. I hate pseudoscience nonsense too, but I know how real it is, that you can seduce 10 different people in real time to keep staring at you and never letting go. Yeah, you may not believe it until you try it yourself. It's amazing and scary how much our mind is capable to manipulate the stuff around us.

Wow that's good info to know. Thank you. I'm going to share her quote

Someone who’s actually done some research. Love it

Dr. Fauci would disagree

@@Owlhousespecial Kary Mullis is a he. Here he is: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Xc0Kysti6Kc.html

@@Owlhousespecial its a man

+spineshivers K.

👍👍

you must be fun at parties

+spineshivers waw, thanks captain obvious

+spineshivers , more like +captain buzzkill

***** Important enough for me to have taken these valuable seconds out of my life to point it out, yes.

shimble scuse Yes, I noticed that right after I had written my comment.. : /

+BuFufilms Came across Robert Koch a few times in High School, everyone I Knew pronounced it as "coach".

+shimble scuse How? I seriously think their pronunciation was good enough. Yes, it wasn't perfect, but I thought it was pretty good for someone who clearly isn't a French-speaker.

@@juanpablomina1346 *german-speaker. Yes I don't care that your comment is four years old

Nope that's a straight lie. You ever heard of Molecular Koch's postulates?

hmm

And let's not forget we don't use Koch's postulates anymore because it's too faulty

But hey, at least they both became the first to go to the right path lol

Terrain theory is everything ... You can watch the documentary terrain and it explains the fraud behind germ theory

its a hoax

Terrain theory is nothing but lies from con men. Nothing more nothing less.

Nothing but mad ramblings of a drug addled charlatan. Seriously just looking at Bechamp's microzyma shows how utterly detached from reality he was. How can all microbes be one species when any highschool student can destroy that claim by running a gel electrophoresis and compare the DNA bands of different microbes and see how different they are.

It's a disproven hoax.

I know it's a bit pedantic but Robert Koch was German and quite frankly I believe he was credited was because through his culturing techniques he was able to consistently grow the bacterium in a controlled manner but even then Filippo Pacini's contribution was recognized by the Cholera Commission of the Imperial Health Office in Berlin

Who's Beauchamp? That says it all really.

That book is nothing but lies written by a worthless hack how has no clue how the heart works nevermind something as complex as infectious diseases. In fact all he does is bash germ theory and modern medicine while providing no proof for his alternative ludicrous claims.

Because it is literally germ theory denialism. Now wonder, society needs to stomp out dangerous misinformation and immune to critical thought conspiracy theories. It would be negligent not to do so.

+Umbr a And why would you say that?

+Kamizushi Akinari because people today think global warming is not real. but with future generations, they would see that thought very ridiculous. i see how my first post can go either way :/

Umbr a Fair enough.

Truth Seekers Channel I came looking for answers, is germ theory legit?

@@mikeramos91 What is it that you are looking for? Dr Snow was right. I agree with him.

@@mikeramos91 yes

@@mikeramos91 no germ theory is a lie. Compare germ theory with bechamp's terrain theory. We're in a disinformation war with many shills. Do your own research and you'll find much of what we're taught is based on lies.

@@peterburton3095 And you're a conspiracy theories lover. Sooo sick of this "do your own research" stuff, when you actually mean "go in the sewer of the internet and select exclusively conspiracist websites as your only source of information, discard any other source knowledge and any expert". You are a moron

+DeafeatingPain they obviously didn't know as much as we know, so at least they have an excuse. for example the four element theory. did the philosophers at that time know about atoms?

+Yakine BikeRace Well, the most basic atomic hypothesis arose in ancient greece and/or india. The idea was simply that there existed some small quantity of material that was not itself created from somthing. The argument that I remember reading was that a philosopher cut a piece of food (cheese, meat, etc -- it varies) in half, and then in half again, postulating that eventually there would be a portion of food too small to cut in half -- even with the sharpest and smallest of blade.

Total agreement. Maybe a few years later people will look over towards the big bang theory as the most ridiculous thing in creation.

DeafeatingPain oh yeah great thought you came up with. People might even look back at Einstein 's relativity theory with shame in 30 years, since its technically just a theory. So it could be proven wrong at that time

Flat Earth has been debunked since ancient times

As a nurse, I support the Terrain Theory. Vaccines and Pharmaceuticals are a massive industry. Personally, I never have vaccines. never get sick, eat clean, live clean, think clean

@@ladystardust2606 I agree with you but *beware of endocrine disruptors*

Louis Pasteur was a fraud. On his deathbed he said the terrain theory ( Béchamp) was all! Pasteur was a man with a big ego. The germ theory is business.

@@WaarheidWintAltijd Bernard was right: the pathogen is nothing, the terrain is everything.

No it isn't. I've been challenging terrain theory and it's supporters and so far no one has answered my challenge successfully. Seriously 45 people failed. Besides this sham of a theory has no proof.

Very suspicious. The elite want to deceive people and prevent them from knowing the truth.

True!!! They’re censoring, hiding and deleting anything that’s not germ theory stuff.

@@jaberwasp1925 Oh yes yes yes another conspiracy theory ! Wowowow so exciting... the elite are so mean.. oh wow, they want you to believe the earth is a globe and germs are real, but you KNOW the real truth. I mean come one, get a life...

+Werdxp It seems to me that you don't properly understand what the speed of light means. The speed involved isn't what it is because light travels at that speed, it is what it is because the properties of physics dictate that that speed is the fastest any information can travel from one place to another. Which is why, for massless particles like photons, they go at exactly that speed, as they aren't hindered by anything else in space.

This "fastest any information can travel from one place to another" is exactly what I'm talking about. Your entire life you've been taught this under the guise that its completely mathematically consistent when it's not. Check out Rupert Sheldrake's Ted Talk. Though I don't believe in all his theories, he has the attitude down right. No science should be out of the realms of rigourous questioning

+Werdxp phys.org/news/2014-09-curious-case-fluctuating.html The theory of relativity and electromagnetism work very, very well. And they pretty much need the speed of light in the vacuum to be constant. Maybe you refer to something like this: www.iflscience.com/physics/speed-light-can-vary-vacuum But in that case, what do you expect professors to teach? "Oh students, we actually know nothing, go home!" Two very basic theories that have ample evidence work well with what is currently taught. Sure, it might me wrong, but as we don't know, we can only teach what seems to work. It's not like it's a math class where you prove everything you say. In a physics class, it's tacit that what they teach you isn't 100% true. I mean, at some point they teach you Newtonian physics and we all know they're not actually right...

no ones stopping u LMAO ask all the questions u want 😭

"not allowed to challenge "scientific consensus"" You are allowed. Research, find evidence and publish papers which turns the consensus around. Spreading stupidity in the media is not challenging of scientific consensus.

And Epigenetics is the next iteration of understanding of immunity.

@Bryan Hernandez Dr Tom Cowan, Dr Stefan Lanka & Dr Andrew Kaufman expose the germ THEORY fraud.

@@peterburton3095 all those Dr's you named are ether cranks or frauds. Using credentials they have to push a false narrative for personal gain.

@Bryan Hernandez and you can get info on epigenetics by dr Bruce Lipton.

you just said something to be third

+Mabatu Obama what?

PrussiasGirl you just typed a comment (Intresting) without any depth or content just to be the 3rd commenter

+Mabatu Obama no i didnt not i type intersting because the video was interesting i had nothing else to add.

PrussiasGirl if you say so...

ni,this is not a reference

What’s Terrain theory?

Sam Alex you're off to a brilliant start. You've obviously done your research and you must be so very familiar with the name 'Beauchamp' by now. God bless you terrainers 🤣

Oh sure, after the flat earthers, now we have the terrain guys... why are these people so eager to show others they are complete morons ?

Haha not one mention of terrain theory

It should be seen that way NOW!!!

Doesn't get any more barbaric than that. Get a jar of leeches why don't they?

@@NikkyKnowsUNzs2001 well, unfortunately we don’t have anything much better.

@@paulmahoney7619 Who brainwashed you to think like that?

@@NikkyKnowsUNzs2001 I would like to know where you’ve read of reliable cancer treatments better than chemo, radiation and surgery.

why

@@oliverjudson1834 Have a look further down in the comments. It’s well covered..

Yeah Bechamp's theory can be destroyed in one sentence. The microzyma doesn't exist because it breaks the laws of thermodynamics. Boom terrain theory destroyed.

@@sithwolf8017 To save me time, do you have links to sites detailing this? The problem as with all theories is that they are theories and not always conclusive. I have to check my own bias towards Terrain theory. Though I have had nothing but positive personal measurable results for myself. I fixed my asthma, without medication, which nearly killed me when I was 3.

@@danjsilve actually all you really need is basic highschool biology and some logic. Now bear with me this might get wordy. Bechamp claims that all microbes that we see in diseased tissue are not the cause but act as a clean up crew for the tissue. He then goes on to claim these microbes are all one species that originate from something he calls the microzyma. This means microbes from bacteria to multicellular parasites like tapeworms are all the exact same species. Now we get into the problems. According to genetics each organism on this planet has a unique code that we call DNA. To be considered part of the same species both organisms need to share 99% DNA with each other. That means the genes in a bacteria need to be found in a tapeworm or fungus. Yet if we run any gene sequencing experiments we see the tapeworm has far more DNA than a bacteria has. Where is that DNA coming from/going to? We also have no explanation for where the matter or stuff comes from. A tapeworm is 21 feet. A bacteria is a millimeter. Where's all that matter coming from? With no explanation for either thing we are lead to believe it just magically appeared or disappeared. This obviously breaks the laws of thermodynamics as matter/energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Ergo if the microzyma can't follow these simple laws then it doesn't exist therefore the core of Bechamp's theory is false.

Biome en la terrain is everything. Not that they don’t exist just that they don’t cause dis-ease unless & until the terrain fosters an imbalance for such deluge, decimation, & demise. The same sun that softens butter? hardens clay.

@@Casmige terrain theory isnt even medically proven

@@Casmige terrain theory is nothing but lies and fails to answer a few simple questions I posed that can be answered using simple logic.

Lol basic genetics completely destroys Bechamp and his asinine microzyma.

@@sithwolf8017 Ever heard of dark field microscopy?

@@shyama5612 so any luck figuring out how dark field microscopy counters the fact that DNA destroys Bechamp's microzyma and terrain theory?

im 1001

Bingo

It’s as if germ theory and terrain theory could both have truth…

God can be used as a metaphore for certian structures of existance... it's possible that once we understand the nature of consciousness christians will call it god and atheists will say they were right all along. but both will be pointing at the exsact same thing. Theism is dying. the main reason is that the logic of their world view is eroding. hopefully theism will die down enough to not make a big splash when the public understands the nature of consciousness.

+FullMetalPower7 you can't disprove god,because you can't disprove a negative.It's like saying some day someone will disprove existence of fairies,unicorns,santa,etc.People just should understand how absurd it is to believe in such things. What can be disproved is specific religions(which we already did) like christianity or islam ,because we know there was no adam and eve,because we know about evolution.

A lot of information the bible and other religious books have are disprooved for a long time now and almost anyone who is teached a religion after the early years of life, won't be able to take it seriously. But there will always be things that are not disproovable like the existence of a god so some people will always stick to a book that has tons of misinformation already. A propular way to deny that by religious people is by saying all those parts are not to be taken literally, but you could also say that to any part of the book that hasn't been proven wrong aswell. Maybe the entire bilble is supposed to be made up so people would listen to the 10 rules. But that they don't consider at all. "Only the disprooved parts are not to be taken literally."

+Fiiischinator you can't disprove the Quran

+abdelrahman galal True, but you CAN show where it contradicts itself, or is just flat out incorrect based on modern scientific understandings.

they dont like resesrch, especially when it flies in the face of those who fund them.

Your spreading false info, germ theory is real

@@Zanderreaper Germ Theory is false spreading info

@@tjellis1479 it's been proven more than many times you can even look under a microscope yourself. Why you not believe it's real?

@@Zanderreaper Just because you can look at something under the microscope doesnt prove that thing you are looking at is causing disease.

@@BB-ki7he but it can prove that they exist, and allow you to research them, germ theory has years and years of research and has been a medically proven fact. why do you not believe in it, its like saying "i don't believe in pregnancy". seriously why do you people not believe in already medically proven science.

Dude...this was a semi academic talk from five years ago. It’s not propaganda just because you disagree