as far as i know, Ursa Major is a galactic highway so, pretty sure this is residual matter from the warp drive, klingons usually, they don't care too much about the space ecology
Black hole Slingshot. If a particle is caught by the curvature of a black hole but just avoids the horizon, a tremendous amount of acceleration would be imparted on it.
Precisely what I was thinking. Think of a quasar pointed at just the right angle along the tangent to a horizon. And when everything is aligned perfectly, it visits us. Edit: one in a quintillion sniper shot from long, long ago.
You have to be careful with how a slingshot works, you cant for example use just _a_ black hole, youd lose just as much from getting out of the well as you gain falling in. You can use an orbiting black hole which can get up to incredible speeds and impart a lot of energy on things sweeping by* but I dont believe itd be anywhere near enough to produce the insane speed seen in these particles. *Id recommend reading 'The Halo Drive' by astrophysicist David Kipping who has his own channel on RU-vid 'Cool Worlds' for a very neat break down of how we could use such things in the far future.
Particles accelerate on the way in, but decelerate again on the way out. The net velocity added to the particle can't be more than twice the velocity that the black hole is moving relative to us. (From a distance, a gravitational slingshot looks like a bounce.)
The black hole would need to be large, rotating quickly and with a powerful magnetic field. The particle would need also to be in the upper TeV to lower PeV range and hit at the event horizon boundary at the axis of rotation. Imagine a supercollider but with an acelleration ring that is about the orbital track of Neptune's orbit.
Given several black holes orbiting one another, and trillions of particles entering their realm every second, it is entirely conceivable a particle would enter in such a way that it undergoes multiple gravitational slingshots near the event horizons, giving it near-lightspeed velocity.
Your description of the plasma particles being bounced and accelerating between the shockwave and the surface of an e.g. star sounds a lot like a Laser. Sure, it's not light amplification, but perhaps could be called a Particle Hyper-Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation: A Phaser :-) ! Beam me up Scotty!
I don’t know much. But my thinking would be that the particle is probably moving around half the speed of light from the direction of the universal expansion, and the earth is moving outwardly caught in the tidal expansion. Thus from our perspective it is moving at nearly the speed of light.
My guess, as a person with no real knowledge on this stuff, is they escape from black hole. Like they are circling inside the accretion disk of the black hole and getting a super gravitational bump before escaping. That's why we can't find the origin. They are from black holes that don't have a visible accretion disk. There are a ton of black holes out there and most of them are invisible.
Thats great, ive created a um blackhole in a garage using IR escape velocity spinning faster than light on microscale, light couldnt catch up with spinning holo stroboscope at 300000 tachymeter.etc Also two geiger tube interferometrically will make cosmicray detector with theremino software, no scintillators used
There are some serious misunderstandings with regard to physics. Until we get them straight the science community will always dumbfounded by observations One important misunderstanding is the nature of em radiation. It is NOT a velocity in vacuum; it IS a rate of induction. Consider the implications of this difference.
For those thinking 'nearby'.. 2:40 "One of the local clusters of our galaxy" I ASSUME means "one of the galaxies in our local cluster". The local cluster is bettern known as the local group and is a cluster of galaxies, of which ours is one. It's a cluster containing multiple galaxies. So 'relatively nearby' is still a mind numbing distance measured in the millions of lightyears. Andromeda is the closest galaxy to ours and it's a bit over two and a half million lightyears off. A quick Google search for 'local cluster' didn't show anything relevant but if I've misunderstood what that sentence actually means, then someone please let me know. It's nonsensical otherwise. Edit: 3:02 The screenshotted article at this point has the words "supercluster of galaxies" at the top of the screen. So I think I'm fairly safe in my interpretation of that odd sentence.
If a spacecraft was travelling towards us at near light speed, the light waves of the ship would be compressed to a higher frequency light on the leading edge. It means it couod be giving off gamma rays even though lower frequency light as radio waves would be shifted upward to become visible light. (Stealth could be negative or 180 degree shifted radio waves to cancel out the radio waves so the visible light of the ship is eliminated).
I'm old enough to remember a pop music group from the '80s, a group with a strange name: Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark. Change the first word into "Orchestrated" and we have a description of what is ongoing: stellar levels of energy exchanges occurring outside of stars, within the vast darkness of the Universe. An example, the surface of the Sun is at 6000 °C but it is surrounded by the Sun Corona at 1,000,000 °C. This to say, the energy has ways to travel from a very energetic body to a far region of the Space and manifests there as a stationary volume where the EM fields are ludicrously strong. It is not necessarily a front, but a series of stationary sectors with increasing charge, so that a proton is accelerated sequentially - just like in a railgun. In my hypothesis, the particle is not bouncing like the photon between the two mirrors of a laser, but is proceeding like an electron between the dinodes of a photomultiplier. Thank you Prof. Miles for your exemplary videos. Greetings, Anthony
I have two guesses what this might be. First: Space wizard casting fireball at a deep dark old one out past Niburu orbit. Second: Klingon bird of Prey doing doughnuts around Jupiter.
@Anonymous-cc5pn Say's the person not smart enough to keep silent when the jokes fly so far over their head the joke passes the Van Allen belt while they sit in their joyless cubicle wishing for a moment's mirth.
03:42 Hmm that does not looks like a square grid that i'm familiar with. Looks like a stop sign had a baby with the stop hand icon. Good and informative vid.
I have to think there's some natural particle accelerator in the sky that we just haven't discovered yet. The first thing I think of is - do we know what happens when two black holes collide? If a proton is whizzing around the accretion disk, I know we're taught that nothing can escape a black hole, but another black hole probably has enough pull to strip mass away and the interaction of the gravitational fields is likely to let some rogue extemely-high-velocity particles escape
My first guess is that these are particles accelerated in a cumulative manner over time by a supermassive black hole that "escape" via some process not yet known, but perhaps akin to jets from the poles.
Nobody ever answer my hypothesis of the friction of matter and space. Anyway, I believe the only energy abundant could be the Black Hole Jet Stream, but maybe also Super/Hypernova explosions, powerful enough pulsars and Dwarf Stars poles, besides the Sun of course; but what about Dark Energy? Maybe laced with it matter can be laced with Dark Matter and form a different particle; since apparently particles are expression of Energy that bend Space, so I don't see why not bend the Light Speed Limit
There's been extra galactic gamma ray sources reported recently. I've detected Iron cosmic ray decay in my basement particle detector and fogging the entire detector. Is it merely coincidence or cause/effect, but not in that order effect preceding cause, depending on relativity in a Quantum universe? Higgs transient events? Great video.
The explanation about the particle bouncing sounds analogous to a laser, where the pressure wave is the half silvered mirror. I wonder is a collapsing mag field could act like a shaped charge………. Where the repulsive nature of the protons acts to concentrate the energy and therefore speed, like the copper jet in an anti tank round?
Me: making no notable contribution Some dude: gets in a hot air balloon during a solar eclipse with his ion radiation detector and proves cosmic rays exist.
Im sure this has been considered and refuted, but you didnt bring it up in the video. Since we arent detecting the particle itself, but rather its damage (shower of particles), perhaps these arent individual particles. But a number of particles travelling together. For the 240 EeV particle, whats to stop it from being 10 * 24 EeV particles that are microns apart. Arriving at almost the exact same moment. Causing the shower. Its like looking at the damage caused by 10,000 * 1 ton bombs vs a single 10 kiloton nuclear bomb (ignoring radiation), it might be hard to deduce which of those two scenarios caused the damage. Or, i guess im saying, they could be confused for one another. (Again, ignoring radiation.) Also, again. Im sure there is a reason this has been disproven. But you didnt say why, so i ask it.
What if the particles are in fact coming from AGNs but are being accelerated through gravity assists as they travel around other galactic centers/massive stars before hitting us?
This happened so you could explain gravity and how it starts, in a region of space with no gravity on weak gravitational force, ... When particles interact with each other they behave differently in space compared to earth. ,at some point so many particles are bunched up together, in out atmosphere or in space ie gas cloud. cosmic Ray's interact , just like you have shown in this video, cosmos Ray's or other energetic particals can only influence the particles on the outside of a mass of particles cloud, unless its energy is unknown (higher than), unable to penetrate the inner mass from bumping into so many other particles and changing direction, a unorganised process that becomes organised finding order with interaction. If a chain reaction has already started, a calculation of mechanisms that have their own purpose find order to create a structured system of movement dictated by all forces associated with a partical. They start moving in order pushing the particals not associated with this order , out until they also find a place where their charge fit/ finds balance. (Comics rays divide oxygen into atomic oxygen, on the edge of our space, as a example) Since earth already has gravity, I guess all these particles in our atmosphere find their position to form elements we can understand, or we have discovered a process that was here long before us, maybe it has always been that way... Maybe we are just partical bunched up in a form, trying to discover ourselves.... Sorry if I didnt explain well, but one day soon, I well spend a few days explaining this, even though its known already, but still hasn't been associated with the process surrounding gravity....
My idea is a black hohle you can go very close to an event horizon to absurd speed but then it got that extra kick and it flung out either that or alien morse code D
Very likely as well. The problem is, that these particles are coming from a part of space that kinda has nothing there (just a few, small galaxies). Huge blackholes generally tend to have stuff around them. But again, it is not that unlikely to have some weird rogue blackhole that has been kicked from its galaxy by some interaction with another powerful gravitational entity (another blackhole, neutron star, etc.).
Did they actually calculate that they have a proton not a photon and that they shouldn't blindly follow straight to the incoming angle? I mean a photon just follow the curved space. Protons havee mass its more like a bowling ball close to the speed of light.
@@Fiercesoulking Okay, so we know for sure that this wasn't a photon. Here's the reason: Protons can break into multiple particles. Photons can't. When this particle struck our atmosphere, it spluttered like a tomato thrown at a windshield, leading to the formation of other particles. This is called a "particle shower". We detected this shower. Photons don't do this.
@@xxxplayerblyatxxx8992 This isn't what I meant . I know it is a proton . What I meant is when you look at the angle where a photon comes even through gravitational lensing you looking at the source because it works both ways. The effect of mass on a proton should be different /stronger because it has also mass. So when you put up your telescope straight at the angle where it came from you won't see the source. So was this taken into ?
@@Fiercesoulking Ahh gotcha. 1) All particles that have momentum (be it massless particles like photons or massful particles like protons) are affected equally by gravity. Consider the feather/brick experiment, where both experience the same acceleration due to gravity. So no, protons and photons wouldn't experience gravity differently. 2) Could the trajectories of these cosmic rays have been affected by gravity? Sure. But remember that gravity is tremendously weak. Therefore, for it to make such large changes in trajectory, the particles would need to have originated from far far away. The GZK limit tells us that this is not possible. If the GZK limit is correct, then we know that these particles have originated relatively close enough to not be affected by gravity so much. Therefore, for you to be correct, the GZK limit would have to be wrong.
If mass can distort/stretch/pull on the space around it, would an object with a large amount of energy also be able to influence the space around it? Would such influence aid in explaining these particles?
So I’m way too stupid to be a particle physicist so I have some questions about Ultra-high energy cosmic rays 1.) The rays are accelerated to very high speeds but when they hit our atmosphere; they are virtually harmless to humans? 2.) I’m a huge fan of futurism so I remember watching an Isaac Arthur video where he speculated on the creation of a photon with a joule of energy to itself. That’s NOT what’s happening with the Armasetu and OMG particle right? The particles of the ray each contain less than a joule of energy? Thanks!
1) Yes. Well... kinda... So why are cosmic rays dangerous? Cuz they're ionizing. They have a lot of momentum, that they can use to alter our DNA, which can lead to more cell mutations, and hence an increased risk of cancer. Thankfully though, ionizing radiation is blocked quite easily by our atmosphere. Its energy is absorbed by our atmosphere, thus reducing its ionizing potential to practically nothing. However, if you go to very high altitudes (like airplanes), then you receive bigger doses of cosmic radiation, cuz there's not much atmosphere to shield you from it. 2) "creation of a photon with a joule of energy to itself". I'm not sure what you mean by this. Joules are just a unit of energy. Sooo like... yeah? Energy is definitely being used to accelerate this particle to such high speeds. But what is giving rise to this energy? That's what the mystery is all about.
@@xxxplayerblyatxxx8992 I was thinking of a single photon with a joule of energy. That single photon. Obviously that’s ridiculous since that photon would be the most powerful photon of all time?
@@Italianjedi7 Sure, a single photon could have that energy. Are you asking if Amaterasu could be a high energy photon? The answer to that is no. Light interactions with the atmosphere are much different than proton/alpha particle interactions. This is most definitely a massful particle.
50exa-elevtronvolt is about 8J. If that energy would be delivered by an ion shower into 8 kgs of tissue that would mean an exposure of 1 Gy for that 8kgs of tissue. A whole body dose of 10 times that could be fatal, so it would be quite unhealthy to run into the OMG particle. I also wondered if you could feel a push if such a particle would hit you. For particles close to the lightspeed we can approximate pc=E, so p=E/c, a 50 EeV particle administers a momentum of 2.7•10^-8 Ns, which would (by itself) be absolutely unnoticeable. This is where the gorila-throwing- bowling-balls analogy goes wrong.
So, a 300 EeV particle would have about 48J of energy? A bit over a quarter the energy of a 40 grain .22 calibre rifle round, but concentrated in an area the size of a proton. Hmmm. That might hurt.
Spherical mirrors? Really? Are you sure you don't mean hemispheres or convex or similar? I'm not familiar with the Fly's Eye array at all, but a spherical mirror seems like a really unusual element in any kind of detection array. Can you recommend any content here that explores how this array works and why it needs shiny reflective balls?
what would happen if their was a particle that was going the same or slightly faster then the speed of light but they have slowed down just enough to be just below the speed of light and such they arrive before the event?
I'm very excited about this. The particles are accelerated incredibly like this somehow. Didn't require a supermassive explosion or something. Imagine we figure out how its done. We can use those super energetic particles as fuel for space ships that can travel between stars. We can solve earth energy problem. We can try to reach to the next kardashev civilization scale. This can turn out to be huge.
"We can use those super energetic particles as fuel for space ships that can travel between stars." In theory, yes. However, it is very likely that this is some phenomenon associated with huge celestial bodies. But sure, there is a possibility that we could find some exotic mechanism that we could use to build better particle accelerators/ better electric thrusters. "We can solve earth energy problem. " No we can't. We would still need to get and store the energy from somewhere. There isn't any evidence that these particles are just spontaneously creating energy from thin air. "We can try to reach to the next kardashev civilization scale." No energy, no advancing on the Kardashev scale. "This can turn out to be huge." I agree to a certain degree. In my opinion, it could be huge if we never manage to find an answer to this using 2023 physics. This would mean some new physics, which is always huge. This could in theory by dark matter particle annihilation, which could provide us a lot of insight into its behavior.
@@xxxplayerblyatxxx8992 You don't need to act like smart ass to me. Of course I know you will need to solve other problems like storing the energy. Thanks for the comment anyways.
@@xxxplayerblyatxxx8992 I don't know much about particle physics, but don't they detect *only* the particles hit by the original particle and the 3rd, 4th, etc particles? Couldn't a few cosmic rays hitting at the same time and direction make it look like one super energetic cosmic ray?
@@FLPhotoCatcher "don't they detect only the particles hit by the original particle and the 3rd, 4th, etc particles?" Kinda, yeah. It's called a "particle shower". "Couldn't a few cosmic rays hitting at the same time and direction make it look like one super energetic cosmic ray?" Like... yeah, this isn't impossible. However, the odds of this are just so so so so so so so so so so so so so low, that it can very easily be ruled out. Plus remember, even if these are say 2 particles crashing into the atmosphere at the same time/location, their individual energies would still be very very high. Hence, if you want to solve the extremely high energy problem, you would require hundreds of these particles to come from different angles and crash at the same location and time, close enough that they pass in the error range of our detectors. Not impossible, but so improbable, that this being an alien ship with a Katy Perry concert going on is much more probable.
If some particles are moving at the speed of light or faster, they may not be able to be detected ....I am musing....So how many of these things are really being slung out ??
Well I'll just throw this out there: Maybe the OMG's are some kind of exotic photon that has a little tiny bit of mass. We could call them "heavy photons". How cool would that be if such photons turned out to be real.
Maybe so, and that would explain why it creates some energy, but not very much, despite it's insane speed. 1 kg when c=99.9999998% the speed of light would produce something like ~7.6GT (or 7,600MT) or 10^32 joules (31798399999999640000) joules of energy. Enough to destroy the Earth. But something with the mass of one electron (there are approximately 10^31 electrons in 1 kg) travelling at that speed would create detectable energy, but probably wouldn't do much. Like was said, it would be like the force of a bowling ball being bounced into the Earth like a basketball.
@@stephenmedley5844 Normally yes I would think so but my so called theoretical photon would be, I guess, a hybrid of a photon and a particle or some other kind of exotic thing. The idea just popped into my head so IDK.
thats retarded, how tf would a photon have mass. Its litterally just a slight "wiggle" in the electromagnetic field. You just shake an electron a bit and the oscillation combined with the fact it takes awhile for the field to "update", and you get a "photon".
I wonder if it's almost like a sneeze - as if the particle were ejected via thermal disruption and the acceleration is massive but we're seeing it speed up, however it decelerates once it reaches the theoretical speed limit of our universe.
Aliens, Its definitely aliens. Id wager Lizard people trying to bait us into an intergalactic war by firing annoying ping-pong particles at us. Akin to when you were young and someone would copy everything you said until you eventually snapped.
“Our” universe, ie, the universe we can perceive with all our tools, is limited to the speed of light. Light curves. That means sunlight EVENTUALLY returns to earth. You know that “long channel” going out from earth opposite the sun? The universe we perceive is a black hole.
Are there particle detectors arrays in space? And it is possible to create a particle collider in space that uses natural cosmic rays as a source of collisions with particles generated by the collider?
Can an oh my god particle be so energetic that it keeps up with light, plank length for plank length, throughout the entire observable universe? So like, if an ohmygod particle moves 1^1000 plank lengths in 500 billion years, and the photon moves 1^1000+1 plank lengths in 500 billion years, won't it only begin to lose the race after 500 billion years have passed? So any measurement done prior to that will show both particles moving equal distances? And does that mean "infinite energy" can be quantified if the timespan or distance traveled is known? Since like, adding more energy to that ohmygod particle won't change the distance traveled if measured less than 500 billion years?
@@xxxplayerblyatxxx8992 What if there is slightly more regular matter that encounters antimatter? Perhaps there are clouds of hydrogen and anti-hydrogen out there? Some of it gets annihilated, but some of it doesn't and is ejected at extremely near the speed of light. It seems unlikely that identical masses of matter and antimatter randomly encounter and completely annihilate each other.
@@robertjennings7282 Possible, but an incomplete explanation. Why are there random clouds of anti-hydrogen in that particular area? Why haven't they annihilated there? Can we experimentally prove this hypothesis?
I'm not a physicist. At the end of the video Dr. Miles asked viewers to spitball explanations for the OMG particle and that's what I did. Experimentally proving the hypothesis might release the energy of a Tsar Bomba to a Chicxulub impactor. @@xxxplayerblyatxxx8992
I think we need much bigger detectors to get more data. I suggest adding these detectors to top of each starlight satellite which planned to cover all of the world, so we can have a world size detector (low resolution but still)
I can barely understand the science behind this and you want me to suggest where I think that they might emanate from! I'll get back to you on that one. Maybe when I have finished a PhD in Atomic Particles.
How come the particles have so "little" energy. I would expect any particle with mass ( which i assume have mass since the only particle that doesnt have mass is a photon,), would hit earth like nuclear bombs? Any mass traveling at 99,99999999% the speed of light would have near infinite amount of energy?
the lighter the rest mass the more difficult it is to speed up; whereas the bulkier it is(in a range) it can reach faster speeds than the lighter one since relativity balances the difference.
But a partical moving faster than speed of light. It would travel like a neutrino. Ie. It would be massless (reverse of neutrino) but be detected prior to an event like a supernova.
@@timjohnson979 that's what I stated. Except their are exceptions to the theory. Nothing traveling through normal space and nothing can travel past the speed of light. It can start faster than light but it would move backward in time. Though we have never seen this in nature and we assume it creates a paradox. So science assumes that if paradoxes exist then it's probably not possible. All I'm stating is if such a particle exists. Those would be the characteristics and those characteristics are not present here. But yes I agree, it breaks out understanding of causality.
Was the particle coming from the Virgo Cluster? Also, the options for this particle being impossible 1) originated nearby 2) measurement in error 3) there is no CMB outside the Earth’s vecinity. We are measuring water reflected microwaves. i.e. the particle falsifies CMB measurements
At the speed of light, except that that's the speed of light in space that is falling into the black hole. The further you get from the event horizon, the slower that falling is happening, so the faster the light gets from an external reference frame. Basically if you could somehow slice the black hole in half and watch the radiation leaving it, it would creep away at first and accelerate up to 'normal' light speed as it got further from the event horizon. Also, perversely, assuming hawking radiation is real then big black holes produce vanishingly little, it's small black holes that would have high outputs.
The speed of light isn’t constant because time and distance aren’t constant. It’s not complicated. There is so much wrong in cosmology. It’s almost entirely based on assumptions, assumptions of dark matter assumptions of dark energy assumptions of a universe expanding from nothing into oblivion for no reason assumptions of a single age of the universe and the assumption that everything just appeared from nothing like magic. Redshift is from a light source from a greater mass. Distant galaxies are more redshifted because of the greater amount of mass that the light has to pass by. The vacuum energy is from black holes absorbing space time, not from imaginary inflatons. Dark matter is assumed because the correct differing measures of distance and time are not being taken into account. If there was a cat the size of a galaxy it would be thin in the middle and its much larger arms and legs would be moving faster than the rest of its mass. Matter and energy cannot make or direct themselves and they are only going from order to disorder disproving the idea that they made and directed themselves. The problem is that cosmologists are not considering the actual evidence in front of them. The evidence is one giant elephant 🐘 in the room that the (secular) scientists try their hardest to ignore and pretend that the elephant 🐘 isn’t there when the elephant 🐘 of actual physics is there. The speed of light is NOT constant because the measurements of time and distance are NOT constant throughout the universe. In our observation of light from distant galaxies the light only slows down when it encounters the mass inside of a galaxy according to general relativity which is an observed fact. There’s no excuse for scientists to be making up their own version of physics.
Ok then, please prove that it isn't constant. I would certainly be open to this idea especially since Einstein's theory of relativity can still work with a changing speed of light & that's how he originally formulated his theory. Alexander Unzicker, a scientist on RU-vid, has some excellent videos on Einstein's theory of relativity with a non-constant speed of light.
Yup modern science is such a complete clusterfuck of ignorance. You have utter nonsense such as the 7 base SI “Fundamental” units that are dependent on another (WTF?) or nonsense like a *scalar* (Avogadro's number) is considered an “unit” (WHAT?!). Cosmology, like you said, is a complete shitshow of ego, insanity, and (bad) assumptions. From Thermodynamics we know that “Energy cannot be created nor destroyed only transformed” yet the universe “magically” came from nothing (an impossibility) along with *all the Laws of Physics.* Instead of just admitting the _universe has always existed_ Cosmologists ignore the other elephant in the room - What *caused* the universe AND the Laws of Physics to spontaneously come into existence in the first place if there was no time and space before?? They want the first miracle for free and to ignore the remaining ones. Halton C. Arp, Edwin Hubble's assistant, has numerous examples showing contradictions in the assumption “redshift == distance”. Of course his data was ignored and he was shunned for having the courage to speak out about the status quo. Other data shows the speed of gravity is SIGNIFICANTLY faster than the speed of light but that too is swept under the rug because too many egos are too scared to admit their precious dogma might be incomplete. You are spot on about the speed of light not being a constant. Scientists *assume* it is throughout the universe but have never *verified* this assumption. They worship the plagiarist, misogynist, fuzzy haired crackpot Einstein who pulled a number out of his ass and ignore his many mathematical mistakes in his equations because that would threaten their funding. False profits have replaced false prophets. Until Scientists (re)discover the 6 fundamental forces they will always be making shit up (String Theory) instead of having humility to look at the contradictory data and start again from scratch. They could start by throwing out the cognitive dissonance of the “thought experiment” (sic.) instead of hijacking deductive reasoning with their insanity. At least by 2050 we will finally have an answer to the nonsense Fermi “Paradox” so Scientists can stop wasting their time and money on questions that have *already been answered* thousands of years ago.
You seem to have an interest in physics. Start with a basic book on math (algebra) and one on physics (Hewitt's "Conceptual Physics" is a good start). From there you can work on what's called "University Physics". A commonly used textbook is Young and Freedman. This will give you good starting place. Of course, enrolling in a course is ideal but understand that is not an option for everyone.
They should study railgun papers to help them solve problems. Using a plasma to accelerate a projectile was being done over twenty years ago. Look at reports from the defence science and technology organisation (DSTO). Papers/reports by Yon Chia Thio and Victor Kowalenko looked at the physics of the electromagnetic acceleration of projectiles. Numerous reports/papers on the experimental work also available.
This is the entire makeup of matter & free energy: 1) Dark Points = (Particle / Solid Mass / Do Not Change Size) 2) Light Points = (Energy / Massless / Does Change Size) 1) When 1 Dark Point and 1 Light Point combine, they create 1 Dipole Element. 2) When 2 Dipole Elements combine, they create 1 Photon. 3) When 1,823 Photons combine, they create 1 Proton. When 1,824 Photons combine, they create 1 Neutron 4) When Protons and Neutrons combine, they create the rest of existence 1) 1 Dark Point + 1 Light Point = 1 Dipole Element. 2) 2 Dipole Elements = 1 Photon. 3) 1,823 Photons = 1 Proton & 1,824 Photons = 1 Neutron. 4) Protons + Neutrons = Everything & Everything is Light When enough Dark Points and Light Points combine, the Dark Points all congregate in the center of the protons and neutrons and the Light Points create a coating around the Dark Points so that they're no longer seen. In the stable elements, extra photons want to combine with the protons and neutrons, but are repelled into orbitals by the Light Points. Roger Spurr of Mudfossil University on RU-vid has irrefutable proof of this and even convinced CERN to change out their particle detectors for CMOS detectors so they too can see this for themselves. Update: CERN has now detected what they call neutrinos (Dark Points & Light Points) for the first time ever, after having listened to Roger Spurr. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Venturis Create Free Energy: Principle 1: Dark Points cannot change size Principle 2: Light Points can change size Principle 3: When (red or blue or green, etc) photons enter into a venturi the Dark Points will be forced to return from the direction that they came from, but the Light Points will separate from the Dark Points and condense and go through the throat of the venturi. Principle 4: When Light Points pass through the throat of a venturi alone, they create what is known as electron showers and increase their energy 200x Task 1: Send (red or blue or green, etc) photons into a Venturi which has a throat smaller than the size of Dark Points. Task 2: Manufacture a device that can capture this excess energy in the pure energy zone and funnel some of it back to the light generating device and some of it toward a battery. Note 1: You need CMOS detectors to see photons. As the light gets pulled into the venturi the Light Points condense to go through the throat. The Dark Points on the other hand cannot change size and are forced backward, away from the throat. As the Points separate, called fission, excess energy is created by the Light Points. Immediately on the exit end of the venturi is a very small zone of pure massless energy of only Light Points. These Light Points will have a significantly increased energy level of 200x as compared to the energy that went into the venturi. Immediately beyond this very small zone of pure energy is when Dark Points show up to attach to the Light Points, which is fusion. We want to use the energy before the Dark Points begin attaching to the Light Points. How to Create Infinite Excess Energy: 1) Create a venturi with a throat that is smaller than the diameter of Dark Points. 2) Send (red or blue or green, etc) photons through the venturi. 3) If an absorption and siphoning device can be placed in the zone of pure massless energy, before fusion occurs, we can harness free unlimited clean energy. Route some energy back to the light generator & route some energy to a battery or whatever device you want. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Repent of your sins or suffer the consequences. Lord Jesus died in our places personally to take the death punishment that sin deserves and then resurrected by the power of God. Believe this and sincerely repent of your sins each time you sin and you will have eternal life and nothing to fear. Fail to repent and you will end up in the Lake of Fire.
My bad , you can call me dadson not god, my Saturday night love particle likely bounced off the moon. I'll have to watch out for that secondary line of evidence lol
What if this is first contact?? Maybe an intelligent life is sending particles at close to the speed of light (because it's not natural) in order to broadcast their existence.
