If you have a stock supercharger and you wanna make cheap horse power? Extractors longer duration cam and a good flowing head. Then if you wanna go even further beyond(?) Then you got to lock at the minor internals eg: bearings, rods, and rings gap and spark plug gap, at the minimum.. If some one can explain the heat management side of it I would greatly appreciate it.
Beautiful graphics. Thanks for sharing 👍 Just one thing: Let’s hope you never have an explosion in your engine. That would be a disaster. A burn, or a combustion happens 1000’s times a minute in your engine, but an explosion - no thanks. Again - thanks for sharing the great graphics.
turbos work the same way, by forcing more air into the engine. the difference is that the turbos use your exhaust gasses and they only kick in at higher rpms, usually 5000+, whereas supercharger kick in at the low end, around 2000 rpm. twin turbocharged system split the boost among two turbos so that they can kick in at significantly lower rpm, and function all the way up to their normal range. also cars with nitrous usually inject it into their turbo. they also generally put less stress on your engine than superchargers too. its possible to have both a turbo and supercharger, called ltwin charging," but its a nightmare to maintain and puts a lot of stress on whatever engine you put it on.
@@yimpyoi9808couldnt have said it better. Thank you for clarifying that twin turbo can eliminate a bunch of lag when set up efficiently. I do disagree that superchargers are worse for your engine. Turbo chargers are certainly harder on your engine specifically because of higher operating temperatures , while a supercharger produces much less heat and is better for longevity. Heat and cycles are what kills an engine the most.
@@OlgarthDBneither are harmful at lower boost pressures. A supercharger is much less effective but has no lag. With the option of twin variable geometry turbos, there is absolutely no reason for ever using a supercharger.
@@spidergoose891 Actually yeah, there is a reason. Its called money and bay space. Two very important things that make your claim that a supercharger is never needed absolute bullshit.
The air and fuel mixture enters the combustion chamber its already pre mixed either by a carburetor or fuel injection by the manifold the only time the fuel is mixed with the air in the combustion chamber is with direct injection engines like diesel or normal petrol engines and also its combustion not explosion its is a burn of fuel not a detonation
Actually depends if it’s a roots, screw or blower supercharger basically the same thing three things over it just has difference on how each does It’s own force induction differently.
It eats your engine power to produce engine power for it to eat and it does it by eating energy gave into it by being fed some belt energy And it will in return suck in air and casually put it inside of your cylinders (This might require you to turn on your engine)
Matters on the application, the space you have, the things you want from your performance aspect. A supercharger runs off the serpentine belt and takes engine horsepower to make horsepower they have no boost lag and they are pretty straightforward. downsides are they struggle on the top end and are prone to overheating and running high oil temp. And again there are a lot of ways. You can run a supercharger including roots screw and blower not to mention a pro charger, or centrifugal supercharger. Anyway Running a turbo charger can go a lot of variable Ways depending if you compound turbo, big single, or TwinTurbo. the process of TwinTurbo ing an engine is having two turbos on each intake if your engine only has a singular intake, then you typically run a big single turbo or a compound turbo a compound turbo is a smaller turbo that feeds into a bigger one less lag, less rpm threshold that needs to be met before the turbo begins to spool because depending on the size of the turbo, you have to reach a certain rpm threshold that will allow boost pressure to be built a turbo typically runs off of exhaust fumes and has a compressor wheel and turbine wheel honestly, I don’t really know what else to say
It isn't, a supercharger uses the engine's power to work so you lose a bit of power while gaining, and a turbo used an energy source that is already lost which is gazes going out
Turbos produce more heat and boost lag, superchargers produce less heat and less peak horsepower but make up for it with practicality in a daily setting. They are safer and provide power without sacrificing as much reliability as a turbo would. At the end of the day, it depends on the mechanic who set it up and the driver who uses it.
if a engines lubrication system worked like the way you are showing in this animation that engine would last about maybe 5 minues . the crankshaft counterbalances submerging themselves into the oil reserves of the engine is completely inaccurate .a engine has a oil pan for a reason .
