How Birth Control Became Legal | Griswold v. Connecticut 

I wrote a new book all about the Supreme Court. Order your copy here: amzn.to/45Wzhur or visit www.iammrbeat.com/merch.html.
In episode 58 of Supreme Court Briefs, Estelle Griswold and Dr. C. Lee Buxton open up a clinic and start giving out birth control to married couples. There's only one problem with that. In Connecticut, birth control is illegal.
Useful Charts video about Charles Curtis: • Charles Curtis Family ...
Useful charts! usefulcharts.com/?aff=12
More Supreme Court Briefs: • Supreme Court Briefs
Produced by Matt Beat. All images/video by Matt Beat, found in the public domain, or used under fair use guidelines.
Snail mail Mr. Beat: PO Box 1982 Lawrence, KS 66044
Donate to Mr. Beat for great perks on Patreon: / iammrbeat
Buy Mr. Beat's book, The Ultimate American Presidential Election Book: Every Presidential Election in American History (1788-2016) amzn.to/3fdakiZ
Donate to Mr. Beat on Paypal: www.paypal.me/mrbeat
Buy Mr. Beat T-shirts, coffee mugs, etc.: www.iammrbeat.com/merch.html
Reddit: / mrbeat
Mr. Beat's band: electricneedleroom.us
Mr. Beat on Twitter: / beatmastermatt
Mr. Beat on Facebook: / iammrbeat
Mr. Beat on Instagram: / iammrbeat
Mr. Beat's Discord server: / discord
Mr. Beat favorites:
Recommended books:
Republic, Lost by Lawrence Lessing go.magik.ly/ml/11jul/
Truman by David McCullough go.magik.ly/ml/11jwc/
Studio equipment:
Canon EOS M50 Camera EF-M 15-45mm Lens amzn.to/3dcNPen
Samtian LED Video Light Kit amzn.to/3llDwHO
TroyStudio Acoustic Panel amzn.to/33CkqHn
Blue Snowball iCE USB Mic amzn.to/2GseOHa
I use MagicLinks for all my ready-to-shop product links. Check it out here:
www.magiclinks.com/rewards/re...
FTC Disclosure: This post or video contains affiliate links, which means I may receive a commission for purchases made through my links
Check out cool primary sources here:
www.oyez.org/cases/1964/496
Other sources used:
law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects...
connecticuthistory.org/people...
www.legalreader.com/griswold-...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswol...
www.thirteen.org/wnet/supreme...
landmarkcases.c-span.org/Case/...
connecticuthistory.org/connec...
digitalcommons.law.umaryland....
New Haven, Connecticut
November 1961
Estelle Griswold and Dr. C. Lee Buxton open a clinic where they give advice and resources to married couples in order to help them avoid getting pregnant. They also prescribed contraceptives, or birth control, for married women. Well this got them in trouble. Local authorities arrested them for breaking a law that prohibited anyone from using “any drug, medicinal article, or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception.” Yep, Connecticut straight up banned using birth control. With the help of P.T. Barnum apparently, the state passed the law way back in 1879.
Well Griswold and Buxton, as well as many others, thought the law banning birth control was wrong. After they were found guilty for breaking it and fined $100 each, they appealed to the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court. Griswold and Buxton argued that banning birth control went against the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Well the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court disagreed, and upheld their conviction, so Griswold and Buxton appealed again, this time to the Connecticut Supreme Court, who...uh...yeah...also upheld it. So Griswold and Buxton appealed again, this time to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments on March 29 and 30, 1965. The lawyer representing Griswold and Buxton was Catherine Roraback, who claimed that the birth control ban violated the right to marital privacy guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. Now, the word “privacy” does not appear anywhere in the Constitution. However, there was that sneaky Ninth Amendment, which essentially said that there were other rights we all had not specifically listed in the Constitution.
On June 7, 1965, the Court announced they had sided with Griswold. It was 7-2. And guess what? They brought up the Ninth Amendment. They also brought up that the right to privacy was inherent in the First, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments, and said the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment should be applied to incorporate Bill of Rights protections to the states.
#supremecourtbriefs #supremecourt #apgov