How Broken is Security Breach on Switch? 

The nintendo switch exploding after freddys hat takes .5 seconds longer to load than usual

What is up with people still thinking the switch weak though. BOTW, Monster Hinter, The witcher 3, Skyrim...

​​​@@BlackCroft666 Depends heavily on optimization,There are many ports of demanding games that deserves recognition But Unfortunately It's mostly panickbottom ports and Witcher 3 port which are taken as "Miraculous ports"... Honestly,*In reality Neither panickbottom ports nor Witcher 3 port are really nowwhere as good as people make them out to be..

@@Unknownmystery.. With how well Security Breach was made it doesn't really give good hope for it to run smoothly on the Switch. So honestly more surprised they semi patched it for the release. Saying it will explode the Switch does give impression people don't think larger games will work on the Switch. Easy to forget the Switch has really pretty games with large world to explore. Also doubt Nintendo would allow a game that explodes consoles to release.

@@BlackCroft666 this all comes down to optimization, something, which we know steelwool cant do

It wouldn’t be a good port if it was glitch-free. That’s basically removing features.

Fr. 0/10 port if Gregory can’t be a time travelling god 🗿

​@@Owen01 fr Gregory should've pulled out a sword to go further in time by 7 years

The glitches ARE the security breach

Gregory master of space and time

If you want another perfect example of that old saying look up the game Dauntless. Its a fantastic example of developers having no plan and no skills to handle developing a game. At almost every possible crossroad the devs make the worst possible decisions.

​@@matthewbailey2744 I played that with some friends in the past, it was so much better back then now we don't even play it because it's so bad

@@matthewbailey2744 There's a reason it's free

@@NotLizardMan3747two of those aren’t ports. And Skyrim can be modded to run on the pipboy in fallout 4. So realistically that doesn’t mean much either

​​@@Vanished584doom and doom eternal, the witcher 3, dying light was a pretty recent one

Considering the switch can run Xenoblade 3 (which is pretty close to an open world game) at a steady fps and the same company behind 3 made Xenoblade X which had some sort of wizardry programmed into it to run on the Wii U, it’s pretty clear that this time around it’s not all the hardware’s fault. Proper code optimization and compression would probably really help SB run better.

​@@NotLizardMan3747it's steel wool's fault for not making a functional game in the first place

The games optimization is awful but the switch is undeniably grossly underpowered

He and Spiff

yeah but he would glitch the game into oblivion

Yes

​​@@squishyseraph7780 but like, isn't that the job of a game tester

@@andrewzeshypikamander1120 Let's add Josh from Let's Game It Out for stress testing.

Feels like most of their patches were bandaids on areas that needed stitches or full reconstructive surgery lol

If I were the characters in the game I would get myself stuck in the mall and do anything that would make Montgomery Gator angry into aggressively punishes me eating his oversized thick caked~

@@Itschrisafton jail

@@Itschrisafton ayo wat??? 🤨🤨💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀 🍷🗿

Timestamp: 0:18 - 13:06

I think it’s closer to “It runs Crysis” tbh

No

It runs Ark

it's a reverse of that, because everything can run doom

Nah. It barely runs security breach is the reverse

Good to know backseat

Ok thanks

@Justin I do have the OLED. So if that's true, then my opinion is a little swayed in that direction. So take that into account everyone!

I am planning to buy a switch but although i want to, I'm still not 100% sure if i want to get it on the switch

As someone who played the PS3 version of Inquisition for over a thousand hours, low-res and achingly long load screens are old friends of mine!

Nintendo doesn't make third party games lmao.

it fits nintendo pretty well. still better than anything theyve made since 80s

​@@randomannoyance how dare you insult luigi's mansion, every dozens of Mario games, pokemon games, the entire pikmin franchise, and many other games by comparing them to this disaster of a port.

@@randomannoyance ain't no way you just said Security Breach is better than Nintendo's entire SNES lineup

@@AtomiicCoasters They're trolling, a broken fishhook is better bait.

There's a point to be made that that could taste delicious

like, they even put the lettuce in there

Therefore, a port to the KFConsole should go flawlessly

Most american thing ever ?

Honestly, I feel like that's just the pc version. The switch version would just be this whole process done twice.

yes and backstream will might struggle

If I were the characters in the game I would get myself stuck in the mall and do anything that would make Montgomery Gator angry into aggressively punishes me eating his oversized thick caked~

impossible lol

same energy as "blindfolded when??"

IM THE 1K COMMENT

is there even such a thing?

@@battletechpropaganda not sure

​@@larrymantic2635 probably no

@@ithemooster not even probably... just no

That's like expecting a glitchless playthrough of Sonic 06' or Hello Neighbour.

I celebrated, then realization kicked in 😳

If I were the characters in the game I would get myself stuck in the mall and do anything that would make Montgomery Gator angry into aggressively punishes me eating his oversized thick caked~ but before that I would put a chocolate on it to give it a little bit of flavor😘😘

@@Itschrisafton What in fanfiction hell-

@@Hahapenisfunni- I think he also commented that on other video

@@Itschrisafton what in the wattpad

It's the perfect port because it carries over every bugs and exploits that the pc version had. It's being done perfectly 😩👌

Og: bugged af Port: bugged af Seems perfect to me

​@@moon4236 14 seconds ago

@@ifif5168 14 minutes ago

@@apogus 2 minutes ago

I'm so baffled by everyone saying "Oh no they made Security Breach worse", like, as if the other versions are stable masterpieces without the same exact bugs and glitches. It's not an improvement over other versions, but it's impressive that they carried the game over to Switch while not making it *that* much more unstable. It's bad, but consistently bad.

​@@delaneyelekes8660 I couldn't read that but *here's some deep fried Freddy*

@@delaneyelekes8660 True, it's just really funny to me that they managed to do this and make the game function ok.

It’s like trying to make a soufflé in a easy bake oven from 2008, it’s original pc release was the three tier in an air fryer because at least there it’s slightly possible if a bit wonky.

@@k-veeaudiojack yes

This game doesn’t even run. It’s closer to sad tumble. Like rolling a metal trash can down a hill

Apart from when it freezes just so the game can load lol

@@inerlotechnologies4908 Still way better than I expected lol.

​@@inerlotechnologies4908 I mean, the original didn't run well on good PCs, seeing this actually kinda run on switch is impressive

​@@inerlotechnologies4908 still runs better than the ps4 version and it's not even close

Probably one team did patches and the other started work on the switch version at some time before the last patches

​​@@camdengrady6433 Usually when developing games with updates. They develop multiple versions but adding stuff in them. For example the release version is version A Version B and Version C were developed while Version A was the live version. Version B and C adds features but to make sure content isn't missing, they add Version A into both versions. Perhaps Switch was developed around the time the game got patched, let's say Version C, the latest version was live while Switch version was being developed with Version B as a template. When putting finishing touches they added the content from the later patches but left certain bugs that were already patched before, essentially they forgot to bring over certain bugs fixes that were already in the latest patch. This can happen in game development, For example, Clash Royale one time released a rework for a card named Executioner, the next update, a different stronger version of the executioner was in, then the next update came and the Executioner was reverted to what it was before the 2nd update where it was different. Essentially Version A had the executioner rework, Version B was sort of an earlier version that they forgot to remove And Version C is normal

​@@rickygamingproductionsof course clash royale does that, its like thr only bad supercell game

@@ahmed4363 fr, I don't like Clash Royale, Brawl Stars is way better trust me, their devs actually listen, while Clash Royale Devs are deaf

​@@rickygamingproductionsspeaking truth. I *tried* to get into clash royale, but compared to brawl and clash, the game just aged terribly and the devs are doing nothing positive about it. I still play brawl stars to this day. Been playing for 4+ years. I occasionally play clash and was obsessed with it as a kid.

I think it's because of InstaLOD, I don't know anything about it, but I think that's the reason why.

@@bonniethehedgefox9139 It's a mesh optimizer with that capability. So I suppose it's responsible for the janky LOD models. But I wonder if the software is to blame, or they set it up wrong and they never checked its output.

Cursor???

@@Smol_Adamm in the Home Screen

@Justin switch is objectively less powerful than any sony and xbox since 4 and one, thats just the price for portability and power-efficiency. and for the given hardware plus their reputation with optimization, i think steel wool actually did a decent job on this port

​@Justin I like the switch but it's extremely underpowered.

@@ArandomPerson668 lol the switch has the power equivalent of a ps2

🤨

I genuinely need to watch a "no Commentary" playthrough to see if the content creators run into any bugs lol

XD

Their seal of quality is worthless nowadays. I have decades old gamecube controllers with less issues than a joycon

​@@malikoniousjoe True. Lmao.

Seal of Quality is a thing from physical games and not digital. And that was in the 90's since the Wii the games with a SoQ are a lie. Unless they came from Nintendo themselves.

​@@ArandomPerson668where?

​@@maravreloadedSomewhat unrelated addition, SoQ was also on their 2 Splatoon Mangas, meaning that it isn't just for games

Honestly it originally wasn’t ready for release on the actual release day but this- this is just chaos

I don't know how to tell you this, but the instability is not a Switch exclusive problem... Backseat was literally testing glitches he only knew about from other versions.

@@delaneyelekes8660 He was also getting the “benefits” of the unstable port such as the game being deep fried, crusty Freddy, and loading screens every ten feet.

Fr lmaoooo 😭

@@tonysonic456 yeah this game has more loading screens then even sonic 06 and that game is supposed to be infamous for its loading screens

Spitch*

@@idontknowwhattotypesoididthiscliff*

​@@Kal_El15 mitch*

Nah you did not do them like that 💀💀💀💀💀

fr

Freddy did nothing, he did not consent to what Map Bot did to him in that day.

Btw it's not bad actually

@@Toy_freddyofficial1 did you watch the video???

@@Schnort play it first

He has been for a while, the entire series barring a few spinoffs is available on switch and has been for years now

YES!!!!!

First Sans now Freddy?

well, i would buy smash bros if freddy was there

If both Sans AND Freddy end up in Smash Bros, I’ll eat my hat

What song? It rips