Тёмный
No video :(

How CGC SCREWED Me on a HUGE GRAIL!!! 😡 

Momo Ono Collects
Подписаться 859
Просмотров 2,5 тыс.
50% 1

I had a terrible experience with CGC and feel royally screwed! 😡 Be sure to watch to catch the whole story!
Watch this next: • I'm Breaking Up With C...
Comment down below your experiences with CGC 👇
Connect with me on Social Media:
👉 Instagram: / momoonocollects
👉 Facebook: / momoonocollects
👉 Twitter: / momoonocollects
Check out my eBay for deals:
www.ebay.com/u...

Опубликовано:

 

20 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 148   
@Enrico_2077
@Enrico_2077 4 месяца назад
Damn, this sucks. If what you say is true, I'm with you. How could the restoration not improve it at all? There's a problem somewhere on their end, and Matt has the ability to fix it, he just doesn't care enough,. Maybe CGC will make it right in the end - I hope so.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Yeah, I don't get it. He even said it improved visually after all the work, especially fixing the spine roll. And agreed, he could fix it in a heartbeat, but just chooses not to
@SilverGoldComics
@SilverGoldComics 4 месяца назад
My hope is that no one ever submits another book to CGC. They damaged my ASM 1, and TOS 39 and took no responsibility. They also over charged my hundreds of dollars, and it was up to me to show them line by line how much they owe me. I also just bought a 9.8 that was in no way was a 9.8 (see my recent video) . No they will be flooding the market with 9.9's which will reduce the prices we all paid for 9.8's.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
So sorry to hear that, that's terrible! 😞 Yeah, the whole 9.9 prescreen imo isn't best for the community or collectors, but for CGCs bottom line and to get PR away from the scandals
@tikertiker2
@tikertiker2 13 дней назад
I had a 9.6 that I sent in for SS. After dropping it off in the mail, realized I forgot to add cleaning and pressing with CCS. So I called customer service and was told sorry can’t add it. Fine, get my signed book back, and resent it for CCS and regrading (book was perfect, only graders notes were finger print on the back, and a small indentation) Took me a while to even find it. I put sticky notes all over indicating what I needed out, attached a copy of the graders notes. Book came back same exact grade and same exact graders notes. I’m 100% certain they didn’t regrade the book and slabbed it with the same grade and grader’s notes. Called customer service and was told sorry you aren’t satisfied. Will never have any restoration work, clean and press with them ever again. Those graders are lazy. CCS passes them the label.
@etanick1
@etanick1 4 месяца назад
the book was likely over graded the first time so the improvements later bump it to the "right" grade...reality is ...CGC grading at best is inconsistent over the years.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
100%, definitely inconsistent
@nixknacks-comics
@nixknacks-comics 4 месяца назад
Nick!!!
@jamesortiz3425
@jamesortiz3425 4 месяца назад
U said a mouth full there!!! 🤔
@pbales8951
@pbales8951 4 месяца назад
I'm glad you are still around @etanick1. I miss your channel.
@etanick1
@etanick1 4 месяца назад
@@jamesortiz3425 just trying to be helpful...I cracked/cleaned/press enough slabs to have some come back not higher even when the books substantially looked better.
@alanhom5714
@alanhom5714 2 месяца назад
Thank you for your video! I appreciate your story and how transparent you were. I have only sent in about 10 comics to be slabbed with CGC. I've not yet had problems but I haven't sent in anymore because I would not want to experience my luck running out!
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 2 месяца назад
Thanks, appreciate you watching and for the feedback! Glad to hear you haven't had any problems 🙂
@christianblees5236
@christianblees5236 4 месяца назад
A very interesting video! I really do admire you for your patience that you've kept for such a long time. The behavior of the CGC manager is absolutely disgraceful! I myself wil lactually never comprehend why people are submitting their comic books for slabbing/grading, though: the main purpose of comics is to read them! And, by the way: what difference would it make for a slabbed book to complete it (like you did with your two pages that had been missing before)? You can neither see nor even check if CGC really attached them to your book, as you would have to crack the slab! You have my full sympathy, though.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Hey @christianblees5236 grateful for your input! I agree, reading comics is massively important. Without these characters and stories, this hobby wouldn't exist. As far as why I got the book completed, I was solely looking at resale value. Collectors pay more for complete books, so when I decide to upgrade my copy, I'd get more out of it. And yeah, I have to trust CGC that they even reattached the pages, but luckily Kenny who did the restoration work was kind enough to send me photos of the before and after work, including the pages, which was nice. I trust him more than I do CGC
@johnsherwood3586
@johnsherwood3586 4 месяца назад
And I think you handled it with class.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Thanks, I tried
@raelnoggoth
@raelnoggoth 4 месяца назад
It's unfortunate that Matt Nelson got your hopes up, but absolutely crazy to me that he would even work with an inexperienced individual on such a personalized basis for a book. You admit that you are pretty new to all of this so your response after not getting the grade that you were expecting is understandable up to a point. It also sounds like the main issue with the delay was with the conservation. Frustrating, but not really CGC's fault and/or responsibility. Not trying to be insensitive, but why should your book/ submission be treated any differently than the thousands of others in line for grading? You already received special treatment by having a direct line of communication with one of the heads of the company. For you, an admitted amateur in the hobby, to question his qualifications because you were disappointed with the outcome did come across as entitled and arrogant. You win some but usually lose more when it comes to grading. Anyone that isn't new to the hobby will attest to this.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
I agree, it is very unfortunate that he set improper expectations regarding the book. The reason Matt worked with me on the book is because of its rarity and the unique situation of what work would be best for the book. Be it conservation, restoration, cleaning, pressing, how best to complete the book, how to get it into a regular slab, or some, all, or none of the above. My inexperience with CGC at the time is and was irrelevant. Not to mention it was at CGCs recommendation and Matt's choice to do so. I at no point asked or expected him to work with me. As I stated in the video I didn't even know who he was at the time. As far as CGC not being responsible for the delay in the conservation work, we'll have to agree to disagree there. CGC has a business relationship with the person doing the conservation work and specifically recommended him for the job. If you partner with someone in business and recommend them, their work reflects on you for better or worse. Just like a subcontractor's work reflects on the contractor who hires them. CGC should take some accountability in recommending him in the first place and at the very least work with the conservator to offer me compensation for the mistake and delay. As for expecting to be treated differently, I'm not sure how you got that impression. I never stated I expected (nor did I) to receive preferential treatment. Did I receive direct communication with Matt? I obviously did. But again, that was a decision CGC and Matt made on their own. I didn't ask for or expect it. I was just asking for a professional opinion on what was best for the book, and their answer was direct communication with Matt. As far as questioning his qualifications, I think it was fairly clear I said that out of frustration after seven months of waiting to get the book back and after a long series of back and forth emails in which Matt to my perspective did next to nothing to resolve my concerns, answer my questions, value my business, take accountability for misguiding me, having customer service disagree with Matt and say the book was misgraded, etc. I even stated in the video that part of me regrets sending that email. I'm sure you've said things not entirely true when frustrated by a situation, right? And does that mean you're arrogant and entitled? I would say not Do I think he's qualified to grade books? Sure. My biggest issues are not with his qualifications but with his misleading me, recommending a conservator that made a big mistake, and then taking no accountability or responsibility for those issues. He wouldn't even bother apologize or explain how his estimate was so far off. I'm not even asking for much. Anyone who has a complaint about a product or service they receive expects that if they bring it to the company's attention, they will at least attempt to make it right. I don't see how me expecting the same in this situation makes me entitled or arrogant. If so, I guess we all are. As far as winning more than you lose when it comes to grading, I'm happy for you that you have the experience to know that, but sorry that you have lost more than you've won. How though, is a person new to grading supposed to know that since that knowledge comes with experience? I guess I should've just known that anyway without the experience? As someone newer to collecting comics, I'm sharing my experience because it's experiences like this that new people clearly are having and unlike me, that experience ends most people's collecting journey, which is a terrible thing. We need to make the experience as positive as possible and encourage new collectors, not discourage them, because that's when the hobby dies. And I think we can agree that's something nobody wants
@raelnoggoth
@raelnoggoth 4 месяца назад
@@momoonocollects It is a unique predicament due to your direct contact with CGC. That is entirely on them. Plenty of books are scarce/low census/ rare and don't receive this kind of one-on-one attention. I understand that you didn't expect it, but you did receive special treatment. As far as CGC being responsible for referring you to the conservator, I see your point. If it's the same Kenny that I am aware of, he is widely known to be one of the most qualified in the industry but also not known for quick turnaround times. CGC is responsible for not informing you of how lengthy the process can be and Matt should have been more conservative when giving you his grade estimate. He of all people should know just how subjective grading can be, especially with lower grade GA books. I empathize with your disappointment. I think Matt gave you unrealistic expectations based on an initial assessment before he actually had all the info necessary for coming to any kind of conclusion especially considering the book was still encapsulated at the time. CGC is a flawed company. That is an indisputable fact at this point. The question is, do they really owe you the better grade that you were lead to believe that you would get? Matt's response was very cold and canned, but it was clear. His estimate was just that and unfortunately it was off by quite a bit. I'd be disappointed too, but not enough so as to question the qualifications of one of the most experienced graders in the entire industry. I hope as a newer collector that this is a learning experience, albeit a negative one. You can always hope for the best, but when it comes to grading, it's pretty reasonable to expect the worst. It's also not an exact science and there will always be plenty of room for human error. Don't let it keep you from truly enjoying the hobby...happy collecting!
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
@@raelnoggoth It's definitely a negative learning experience, that's for sure. Unfortunately for CGC and for me I have learned that I am no longer going to send books to them based on this experience. Again, I don't believe they owe me the grade they estimated it to be. I expect though that they would offer at least an explanation of the grade difference between the estimation and the actual, some kind of compensation for the seven months time window (I was told 2 months) whether that be from CGC or Kenny, and some accountability for their mistakes. Offering for them to regrade it if nothing else to confirm the grade it got would go further, but I'm not expecting that at this point. And again, I don't seriously question Matt's abilities as a grader, I said so much in my last response. It's indescribably frustrating however, to know how much knowledge and qualifications he does have, that he could've easily given me an explanation as to why the grade was so far off from what he estimated, and he never chose to do so. I understand we all make mistakes, we're all human, I'll be the first to admit I make many. When I make a mistake though, I try to set it right, and hope that others do the same. Happy collecting!
@Imbeastly1996
@Imbeastly1996 4 месяца назад
Great video, I’m sorry this happened to you. Pretty much confirmed my plan of never submitting a book. Ridiculous stuff like this happens while someone else gets gifted a 9.9
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Thanks! Yeah, it's pretty crazy. I'm definitely done submitting
@Imbeastly1996
@Imbeastly1996 4 месяца назад
@@momoonocollects the most frustrating part is the lack of empathy he has for your situation. And ignoring the blatant improvement in appearance is crazy. He could’ve at least said some BS like conserved books are more closely examined than qualified.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
@@Imbeastly1996 yeah, it was appalling how he didn't care at all. No answers, no empathy, no nothing. And yeah, he at least could've tried to make something up, but no, nothing 👎
@davidsalaski9095
@davidsalaski9095 4 месяца назад
CGC does not guarantee their grades. But, you're welcome to resend for re-grading, till you get the grade you want.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
🤣I'll do 9.9 prescreen next time
@gregmarshall2513
@gregmarshall2513 4 месяца назад
Why can’t they get it right the first time ? Because they want more money out of you !
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
@@gregmarshall2513 you're not wrong 🤣
@Cincinnatijames
@Cincinnatijames 4 месяца назад
Karen would like to speak to the manager.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
I guess I would be a Karen if I was the one at fault or being unreasonable, however I don't see how that was the case here Thanks for the comment!
@raulmendieta9696
@raulmendieta9696 4 месяца назад
CGC doesn't care about the little guy. If you're not a big gun like Metropolis comics , who gets 9.9s , they don't care
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
In my experience, you're right. They definitely didn't care about me
@SuperMoleRetro
@SuperMoleRetro 3 месяца назад
Sounds to me like the original 3.5 grade was a huge mistake. A huge spine role, tanning, missing pages and whatever other issues are present and a 3.5 should not happen. Matt should have admitted that they screwed up with the original grade. I am not surprised it got the 3.5 with the tanning. They are brutal on tanning.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 3 месяца назад
Definitely could've been the case and if so, I agree, Matt should've disclosed that And yeah, tanning is brutal on the grade
@comicbookshifu
@comicbookshifu Месяц назад
I have limited experience with submitting books for grading, and only did that through CBCS. I suspect that my experience was in the "norm" for them, but was pleased with the outcome and customer service and would submit to them again. That said, early in your video the synopsis of the grading notes seemed to suggest that CGC has different grades for the different tiers of books (restored, conserved, etc). Am I off the mark? While it doesn't excuse the poor customer service experience you had, it may explain the grading outcome for your book. If that was the case, CGC would do well to be transparent about such things. Candidly, with the controversies CGC has had over the past year, I'm not planning on taking business to them. Thanks for sharing your experience!
@upnorthcomics
@upnorthcomics 4 месяца назад
…but it looks like a 3.5? So I’m just confused. Are you hoping they gift you a higher grade so that you’re happy?
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
It was a 3.5 before a bunch of improvements were made and I was told by the head grader of the company who basically wrote the book on grading that after the improvements it should bump to a 4.5, possibly a 5.0. I'm not hoping that they gift me a grade it doesn't deserve, I never stated that that's what would make me happy. As I said in the video, I'm fine with it being a 3.5 if it is actually a 3.5. At the least I would like them to regrade it to make sure the grade is accurate. Their customer service representative did not believe that it was. If it is accurate, I would appreciate an explanation as to why all the improvements did not improve the grade. I would also expect some accountability and customer service ability on their part. I did not have a positive experience and when I went to them with my numerous issues, all I got was complete apathy and zero accountability. The very least they could do was apologize for my experience, and they wouldn't even do that. None of these requests are difficult or seem unreasonable to me.
@upnorthcomics
@upnorthcomics 4 месяца назад
@@momoonocollects I watched the video from beginning to end.I understand where you are coming from… but there were no pictures of the book prior to you submitting it at wondercon, no proof of your contact with Matt Nelson… his first comment in the alleged emails was him saying “I’m apologize for you feeling this way” something along those lines. Sounds like he was acknowledging your disappointment from the get go at least to me. Regrading isn’t a free service. Just crack it and send it back in if you aren’t satisfied. It’s a crap shoot, trust me I know that’s why I don’t submit books to CGC. I have some slabs that I’ve purchased the grade they are in. But I’m the kind of guy who buys the book and not the grade. If you want to collect grades hey that’s cool… by all means everyone is entitled to collect how they want. But next time I would consider using a third party presser or conservationist to work on your book(s) I personally use Jeff at comic spa (he works on mike from lunch money comics books) he is based out of MA and does an amazing job. Let me know if you have any questions, always willing to help people in the community. Take care and keep collecting 🤙
@user-om3xs9up7s
@user-om3xs9up7s 4 месяца назад
You can tell it is a 3.5 from a video ? Maybe it is but I don't think we can tell from here .
@upnorthcomics
@upnorthcomics 4 месяца назад
@@user-om3xs9up7sthere’s two ways to tell- you can read the graders notes and you can tell by looking at the book- you see it through the whole video.
@user-om3xs9up7s
@user-om3xs9up7s 4 месяца назад
@@upnorthcomics Again I ask "You can tell it is a 3.5 from a video ?" And the answer is no , There is no way you can tell a grade from a video or from just graders notes . That is what grading is for , to see a book up close . So you are wrong . Bye bye .
@WillieHall-ct2ku
@WillieHall-ct2ku 4 месяца назад
Since the book was not officially graded it was most likely a 2.5 or maybe 3.0. Grading is subjective especially on buying raw comics for sellers. The individual you purchased the book from could have thought the book was a 3.5 in his eyes. Always look at both sides of the coin before fully blaming someone.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Appreciate it, if it wasn't clear in the video, my apologies. The book was graded, it was a 3.5 qualified by CGC and I gave it to them while it was still slabbed
@doctorshawn3461
@doctorshawn3461 4 месяца назад
Is it possible that it wasn't a 3.5 before and now it is? To be honest grading is very subjective. I have some 9.6s that look flawless and don't know why they aren't 9.8s or 9.9s (lol)
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Yeah, it's possible, it's definitely subjective. I would still lay responsibility on CGC though for over grading it in the first place though. And that still doesn't explain why Matt thought it was a 4.5 or 5.0 🤷‍♂️
@2hugebros241
@2hugebros241 4 месяца назад
Grading is “subjective” but that moron Ryan from Nostradamus with comics or automotive comics lol says it isn’t hahaahha
@adammeade
@adammeade 3 месяца назад
You were completely reasonable and deserved way better service than this. I don’t own any graded comics, I like them raw and this only reaffirms me keeping it that way!
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 3 месяца назад
Thanks, I thought the customer service would be a lot better, but unfortunately not. I don't blame you, I've been buying a lot more raw books myself
@copy801
@copy801 4 месяца назад
A clean and press does not guarantee a grade bump. The book could have been overgraded the first time around. This is why all grading is subjective. You didn't get screwed. You gambled.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Thanks for the comment! Not sure how you got the impression that I thought cleaning and pressing guarantees a grade bump, as I think and said the exact opposite. I didn't know if the book would even bump after work being done to it or not as I hadn't had any experience with conservation work before. It wasn't until Matt said that he thought it would come back a 4.5, possibly a 5.0 that I was expecting a bump Sure, the book could've been over graded the first time around, however we'll never know because Matt refuses to explain what happened. Let's say you're right though and it was, in my mind shame on CGC for over grading it and shame on Matt for at least explaining to me that was the case Of course grading is subjective, however with Matt's wealth of experience and intimate knowledge of CGCs grading process, it's only reasonable in my mind to think the grade will come out close to his expert opinion. It did not You might think grading is a gamble, but I don't see it that way because unlike with gambling, I'm actually paying for a service. This situation in my mind is more akin to a mechanic. I take my car in trying to fix it, they give me their professional opinion on what can be done, but in this case, they return the car to you, months and months longer than they quoted you, the car isn't in the condition they told you it would be, yet they still take your money, then take no accountability or explanation as to why they couldn't get the outcome they said. They won't even offer to take the car back in to take a second look at it and when you try to get answers out of them, they say everything is great and kick you to the curb. If that's not getting screwed, I'm at a loss But let's say you're right and it is a gamble, but that doesn't mean that I also didn't get screwed. Matt mislead me in a big way, they took 7 months to get the book back to me (admitting they made a mistake in taking that long, time in which the book's value decreased), when it did come back it didn't improve in numerical grade despite Matt admitting it improved in appearance, then proceeded to refuse to take accountability, apologize or offer any kind of compensation or resolution for the poor experience, then proceeded to try and cut me off And on top of all that, when I go to customer service, they give me a complete run around, are rudely talking to other people when I'm trying to explain the situation to them, and even proceed to hang up on me If that's not a bad customer service experience, I'm not sure what is Thanks for the comment
@MicCheque1
@MicCheque1 4 месяца назад
Send the book to CBCS.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Something to consider for sure
@davidsalaski9095
@davidsalaski9095 4 месяца назад
CBCS grading is stricter.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
@@davidsalaski9095 Never sent them anything before, I like their cases though, especially with the new label
@PowerStruggle555
@PowerStruggle555 4 месяца назад
why I do cbcs. they are more accurate, with less mistakes. when I grade do cbcs...when I buy graded comics....make sure its cbcs
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Glad to hear you've had good experiences with CBCS, I'll have to give them a try!
@Berzin101
@Berzin101 4 месяца назад
This is why monopolies don't work. CGC are not by default the best in the industry if they happen to be the only one in the industry, and that is why they behave in such a slipshod manner. CGC has a psychological stranglehold on the comic book grading business, and that is to our collective detriment as collectors. If anyone still thinks this company is in any way professional they are just being willfully blind. Their lack of integrity speaks volumes. Then again, seeing as they only spend 10 seconds grading a book, it's astounding that the grade of your book didn't decrease.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Agreed, the whole thing is crazy. More options would only benefit this community imo. Thanks for watching the videos and for the comment, grateful for it!
@mightycomicsandcollectibles
@mightycomicsandcollectibles 2 месяца назад
Great video. I have a question …. What would have made you happy with them after the fact? I’m just curious. I don’t think you’re wrong for being annoyed. I would be too. But they are never going to change the grade.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 2 месяца назад
After talking with their customer service rep over the phone, she said that it's possible that even if the graders had assigned it a different grade, the system could've mistakenly reassigned it back to the original 3.5. But to answer your question what would've made me happy is for Matt to take accountability and apologize for the experience and to offer the solution I suggested to Matt which is to regrade the book at their cost, especially in light of the information I got from the customer service rep. She made it seem likely a system error occurred They also could've offered me a partial refund due to the delays which would've helped. I know they aren't going to regrade books just because people are unhappy with the grade. And I'm not saying that's what I want. It sucks though that I'm not sure the 3.5 is even the grade they assigned it because of potential errors in their system
@mightycomicsandcollectibles
@mightycomicsandcollectibles 2 месяца назад
@@momoonocollects I feel your pain bro. Great video regardless. That’s why I never ask anyone’s opinion unless I completely trust them. Being that he’s in a position to make the company money that will always be his prioirty. 🤷🏻‍♂️ I enjoy you’re content so keep doing what you’re doing
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 2 месяца назад
@@mightycomicsandcollectibles Thanks, appreciate it!
@Klung1
@Klung1 4 месяца назад
My only confusion is that you say you’re new to this, yet you’re literally sitting in the midst of a dozen or so graded slabs.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
I was very new to collecting when I had this experience, yes. This was my first time ever making a CGC submission. And as far as slabs, yes, I started purchasing slabs when I first started collecting because to me it makes more sense. You don't yet have any knowledge of how to grade comics on your own, so you either just to kind of blindly trust dealers (which I did and got burned) or you buy slabbed books and have more confidence in the actual condition of the book. I also believe that slabs display better, something I wanted to do, and are better investments long term. Thanks for your comment, I hope I cleared up any confusion
@TheChadTI
@TheChadTI 4 месяца назад
What an infuriating story. If you didn't email in September, how long would it have been "forgotten".?
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Seriously though, right? It's like there's no quality assurance going on. I can't fathom how many other issues fall through the cracks
@bensaunders2370
@bensaunders2370 Месяц назад
Just watched this after watching your most recent vid. This really is a quite a story -- but as far as I can tell quite typical of CGC in terms of the complete refusal of accountability, even when this could easily have been reframed as a small error and quickly fixed. To go from a pleasant initial interaction to being dismissed, simply because MN could not admit that error had OBVIOUSLY occurred (either with the original grade or the regrade) must have been infuriating. And it wasn't even *his* mistake, if the last customer service person you spoke to was correct -- just an accident that could easily be corrected. There was no need to be defensive about it! Still, if this negative experience got you back into enjoying raw books, which can be displayed in much better (and more archivally protective) ways than those ugly plastic cases, that's a silver lining ...?
@johnsherwood3586
@johnsherwood3586 4 месяца назад
Wow. It’s clear they’ve washed their hands of the situation. And I agree,he’s confirmed that the work done has increased its appearance and condition of the book so……not even a half grade bump? Ridiculous!!!! No accountability especially after giving you advice that potentially cost you more money,more wait time and more frustration. And to not even meet you halfway and offer to regrade your book(even if the grade doesn’t change) for free or even a discount price. I’m sorry you had such a horrible,customer service experience.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Thank you! Yeah, it was pretty crazy
@SmallBizWisdom
@SmallBizWisdom 3 месяца назад
That’s really unfortunate. I thought you were very diplomatic. The absolute right thing for Matt to have done would have been to say “Hey I’m sorry this hasn’t been a pleasant experience for you. Why don’t you send it back (I’ll cover shipping) and I’ll have my team double check the grade.”. But he really didn’t sound like he cared at all. Very disappointing. But then again they’re a monopoly, hence their arrogance. Hang in there though. You have a great book. Protect your love for the hobby.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 3 месяца назад
I appreciate it, thank you. And yeah, I thought that's the least they could do, especially since a customer service rep of theirs thought there was an error But you're right, he didn't care at all. Oh well, great way to lose a customer for life
@rogueafett190
@rogueafett190 4 месяца назад
Dude. .. ..That's crazy!!! That is an insane wait and miscommunication on their end.. .just wow!!! Also, grading is tricky....I think it depends on the grader as an individual, how many books they graded that day, their mood, what books you sent in with it because they can't help but compare them together so unfortunately it's kinda a coin toss. The first grader for that book could have been more lenient. .. .so many things could have happen. Also after they fixed up the book if it sat for months all that work was slowly coming undone.. ..like the spine roll started coming back, the old wrinkles would start to re surface. If they graded it a couple days after fixing you might have got the 4.0
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
True, didn't think of that, the time undoing the work. Yeah, who knows, consistency seems to be an issue
@oldschoolgamer2414
@oldschoolgamer2414 3 месяца назад
Try the clean / press and re-grade. I bet it gets a MUCH better score. Try it. If you clean / press with CGC, it will get higher. Trust me.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 3 месяца назад
I did that the first time, not sure I want to do it again 😆 Appreciate the thought though. I think at this point I'll just sell it when I get a better copy
@TransformersCollector
@TransformersCollector 4 месяца назад
Again….like many others have said, Send this to CBCS
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Appreciate the recommendation, I'll have to check them out!
@comicjourney
@comicjourney 4 месяца назад
Do you have pictures or scans of the book as it looked prior to you submitting it?
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Yes I do, I plan to see if I can get them embedded in the video. Thanks for watching!
@thirtyacres7504
@thirtyacres7504 4 месяца назад
CGC is very inconsistent. I love the hobby - reading comic books. The grading aspect of it, not so much. Since the comic book bubble during COVID, they have shown their true colors. Arguably even before that. I am glad I got out in 2021. I sold my entire collection except for one bin and a few slabs. It does not feel right sending comic books to CGC when I cannot trust them. At this point, CGC feels like a college professor that is told my the administration to give out a certain number of As, Bs, Cs, Ds, and Fs. They do that at most schools.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Yeah, I agree, there are consistency issues. And not surprising when they say at the MegaCon panel that they take on average 10 seconds to grade a book and even though they have 3 people look at the book, only the final person assigns the grade 🙄
@thirtyacres7504
@thirtyacres7504 4 месяца назад
@@momoonocollects That is disheartening to read. It seems like it is all about volume and generating revenue. Zero integrity.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
@@thirtyacres7504 100%, just all about revenue
@rodlyle7862
@rodlyle7862 4 месяца назад
Could you please tell me the CGC # of the Wonder Woman #6 and then I can look up the Grader Notes on the CGC site. Possibly CGC included enlargeable scans of front and back covers at the bottom of the notes as well. Three books I just got back all had them, not as good as Heritage Auctions, but not bad. I understand how upset you were but I would have liked to have seen a closeup of your rare book as well! Hope you get a satisfactory resolution offered from CGC. Sure deserve one! Rod
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Thanks, I hope so too, I appreciate it. And absolutely, thank you for the feedback on doing a closeup! The cert number is 4233481001. Thanks again for commenting!
@ajguez
@ajguez 3 месяца назад
Sadly, cgc is the only game in town. If you want to lose money on your books submit them to cbcs or pgx. I feel you
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 3 месяца назад
You're not wrong 😔
@kyleroussel
@kyleroussel 3 месяца назад
I do sympathize with you. I really do. If the top guy at CGC used the words he did, I would have fully expected a grade bump as well. But at this point I have enough experience to know that isn't how it works, and anybody can say anything until they actually get down to working on your book. Then all bets are off. Maybe I misunderstood what you were asking from CGC as recompense, but I very much disagree with the idea that CGC should feel compelled to regrade / review / bump the grade of a book with a promise that it would lead to more business and positive recommendations. The grade should be the grade no matter who sends the book in -whether a massive dealer that sends in hundreds of books, to the budget collector who submits a couple at a time. CGC's grading should be free of any bias or pressure. Is that realistic? I don't know.. To play devil's advocate for one more moment - imagine being in CGC's shoes. Imagine what could potentially happy if word got out that one customer pushed and pushed for a free regrading his book after not initially getting the result he wanted? All of the thousands and thousands of customers out there who feel that their book was too harshly graded, or didn't get a grade bump after their CCS pressing service worked on the book? It would be bedlam at CGC as their customer service gets flooded with angry calls and emails - more so than it already is with all of their scandals. But I would have also been irate had I gotten the email(s) from Matt Nelson that boil down to a more polite version of "too bad so sad". I do sympathize with your experience. I understand what it's like to have hopes riding on a big book getting a grade bump in order to provide a ROI, and validation that you're doing things "the right way" in this very labyrinthine hobby. To bank on the advice of "THE" expert, only to have it end in a big nothingburger would leave a sour taste in my mouth as well. I wish things had turned out better, but I think in the end it's a very expensive lesson for you, and by extension, the rest of us. A grade is not guaranteed no matter who gives the advice.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 3 месяца назад
Very well said, thank you so much for the thoughtful response. I agree that it's unfortunate and lessen learned that no matter who tells you, the grade is never guaranteed As far as CGC regrading it, I agree they don't want to open pandora's box of regrading every book whenever someone isn't satisfied. One of the main reasons I asked them to is because their own customer service rep said over the phone she thought there was a system error in assigning the book's grade. So I thought they should look it over again to make sure this wasn't the case. The other reason is that Matt offered to review it on my dime, so he at least at some level thought there was value in re-evaluating it Thanks again for watching and the comment!
@kyleroussel
@kyleroussel 3 месяца назад
@@momoonocollects Yeah, CGC reps said plenty in your interactions with them that would have probably gotten me to expect a little more "make it right" from them. From the CSR suggesting a system error, to Matt Nelson offering to review it, they dangled a carrot then did nothing but turn you away. That's certainly not right. In the end I think a bunch of things were said from both sides of the equation that led to CGC becoming paralyzed, and painting themselves into a no-win situation; either they do nothing and potentially lose a customer. Or they take your book back for a 2nd look and potentially open pandora's box. If it makes you feel any better, I bet they've had a couple of Teams meetings over this, and have quietly revised some internal policies on how to deal with these situations (and if they haven't then they really should).
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 3 месяца назад
@@kyleroussel It would be nice to think so
@lawrencet6747
@lawrencet6747 4 месяца назад
Unfortunate situation for you. Imho the expectation that someone's (Matt's) opinion would translate into what a different grader would assign was optimistic. The work performed as you described on your book should/could have garnered a grade bump, but the grader makes the final call. Blaming Matt for a different grade than he predicted vs what you got reeks of entitlement. The customer isn't always right, but they weren't rude. They just didn't give you the answers or outcome you wanted. I hope you submit it to CBCS and I hope you get a better grade. Please update if thats the case and good luck!
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Hi Lawrence, appreciate the comment. I agree that it is an unfortunate situation and that the work seemingly should've bumped the grade. Unfortunately though, I'm going to disagree with you on the other points you made First of all, thinking that Matt's assessment on the book would be in alignment with the grader's assessment in my view is not optimistic, but very reasonable and logical. After all, Matt basically wrote the book on grading and as a head grader, helps set the standard for the company. If nothing else though, being in his position, he would more know about CGC's grading process more than anyone else on earth. So in other words, since he is arguably the most experienced grader and intimately knows how CGC graders grade books, it's only logical, not optimistic, to think their grades would be similar Secondly, I'm not blaming Matt for the book coming back in a different condition than I expected, I am simply asking him to explain how the discrepancy occurred and to assure me that the book was accurately graded, as their own customer service team didn't believe so. But even if I had blamed him for the book coming back differently, that would still be his responsibility as he incorrectly set those expectations too high in the first place. As I said, I didn't even know if the grade would bump at all, Matt was the one who thought the book would bump to a 4.5 or 5.0 and let me know so without explaining the risks or possibilities that it wouldn't. How wanting Matt to explain the differences in grade and/or assure me the grade is accurate by taking another look at it comes across as "reeking of entitlement" is baffling to me Of course I agree that the customer isn't always right, however I also know that if a customer comes to you with a legitimate customer service issue, you do everything you can to make it right. Matt did not, even by your own admission. CGC and Matt did not provide the outcome or even answer the questions that I asked. And I would ask you how hard would it have been for him to do so? Not. Making it all the worse You say they weren't rude to me, and from my perspective that cannot be further from the truth. Matt refused to apologize, take accountability, wouldn't answer my questions or provide or agree to a solution, then attempted to cut me off. I then called customer service who then did not get back to me as they had scheduled, talked in the background with someone while I tried to explain the situation, then eventually hung up on me. If that's not rude, I don't know what is. So again, as you say, CGC, not me, is at fault for the situation as they set improper expectations upon which they did not deliver and then refused to answer the simple questions I asked of them to help resolve the issue Thanks again for the comment and for watching the video
@Allan-ze5bn
@Allan-ze5bn 4 месяца назад
I mostly side with Matt on this. If he really said it could achieve as much as a 5.0 I think that is the real problem because it left you with very high expectations. Looking at a book inside a plastic case and imagining the potential results of clean/press/conservation I think is still a crap shoot even for the guy that literally wrote the book on grading. If he was going to get you excited about the potential, he should have been underlining it with a heavy dose of "but don't get your hopes up". Grading is subjective. Perhaps it was originally a nicer 3.0 that got a gift grade, and now it is perhaps a weak 4.0 that got graded a little harshly. Awesome book nevertheless.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
I appreciate it. And yeah, I agree that the real problem lies with Matt setting extremely high expectations and not tempering them at all with the alternative possibilities. Especially when it's heavily influencing a purchasing decision. That's not right. It also sucks that he put in absolutely zero effort to correct his mistake afterwards. Frustrating for sure
@robandkrissy
@robandkrissy 4 месяца назад
💯 Morgan!
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
@@robandkrissy Thanks!
@ZOMb2010
@ZOMb2010 4 месяца назад
Anyone that sends their comics to this company are screwy... waste of money people ..
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Definitely feel like I wasted my money on this one
@Tom-gp6oy
@Tom-gp6oy 4 месяца назад
I can see why youd be disappointed, but it was probably overgraded in the first place. Inconsistencies in grading are very frustrating though. 7 months may seem long, but i waited an entire year for 10 modern books to come back during the height of submissions a few years ago, and they werent being pressed or anything
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Sucks to hear that, sorry they took so long
@matthazard
@matthazard 4 месяца назад
This situation totally sucks. The timing and expectation setting is terrible. It seems to be a running theme I see and hear all the time, it all seems fixable? As was mentioned in another comment, does the accumulation of defects that are still present mean that this book is capped at 3.5? If so Matt should have plainly said that. With all the back and forth and what you likely paid he could have sent a couple of screenshots from his own grading book to squash the issue if the grade cap was the case. I think generally they don’t want to own up to anything in order to not be legally responsible, which sucks…
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
I agree, the timing and expectation setting is all fixable, unfortunately they don't seem to care. Any yes, if the book is a 3.5, I would understand, I just wanted a simple explanation as to why. To your point, it could've been as simple as screenshots with some commentary. However, Matt was unwilling to do so. I wish they took their customer service issues seriously, but in my experience, they definitely don't
@JediFarce
@JediFarce 4 месяца назад
You probably havent worked in a corporate structure before, but the figurehead of a large company isnt necessarily the most experienced or informed. In our company some CEOs have been hired based on nepotism and not ability. If you're able to look past the opinions or evaluation of a upper management individual, who probably isnt a expert in his field, you might realize the grade is appropriate and perhaps the pervious grade was too high. At the very least you recieved a blue label.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Thanks for the comment! As someone who's worked almost exclusively within corporate structures, I agree that the figurehead isn't necessarily experienced or the best fit for the role In this case though, Matt has decades of experience grading books and has written about his grading process significantly, so he in my mind is qualified to make such assessments If the previous grade was too high, I agree that could be a reason it didn't bump, the problem is any reason is speculation because Matt never would answer the reason for the difference. And even if the grade had been lower, in my mind shame on CGC for not graduating it appropriately in the first place And to clarify, I did not receive a blue label nor was I expecting that as I knowingly had conservation work done in the book. So it came back expectedly as a conserved or gray label Appreciate the comment and thanks for watching!
@xabbott
@xabbott 4 месяца назад
He can't explain the difference since grading is subjective. He won't throw the grader under the bus since that calls into question the entire operation. They know you're only other option is CBCS so they don't really care when people say they'll stop submitting.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
I agree they don't care. I just wish he could explain even hypothetically how I book can improve visually but not in grade
@pbales8951
@pbales8951 4 месяца назад
I can understand your disappointment since you thought all these actions would result in a higher grade based on Matt's initial assessment. However, looking at the photos and graders notes on the CGC website, I would agree that the book is accurately graded as a 3.5. It's hard to be totally sure without seeing the book in-hand, but based on the notes and photos, I'd say the grade is correct. As someone else mentioned... the book was probably over-graded the first time. You keep saying that you are new to collecting and don't know how to grade. The best thing you can do is learn to grade. There are tons of resources that can help you do this--not the least of which is the grading forum on CGC's website. You are DEMANDING that the president of CGC teach you how to grade. That seems to exude a sense of entitlement on your part. I think Matt Nelson went above and beyond the call of patience with you. Also, you have a large collection of books on your wall. How does it compare to books that are near the same grade? Just do the leg work that it takes to learn to grade. That way, you won't submit books for grading with unreasonable expectations, and you won't get disappointed. For someone who has worked in customer service himself, I'm a little surprised at your response to this--and your emails to Matt. Matt gave his opinion on a book that needed work and thought it could get a grade bump. If the accumulation of defects still present after the conservation work still warrants the 3.5 grade, there is nothing Matt can do about this. Your statement in the email to Matt that "I know you'll make this right" is baffling. What is he going to do to make this right? Give it a grade it doesn't deserve just to satisfy you? You paid for a service, you got the service, but you aren't happy with the outcome. The service was completed as contracted... they graded the book, incapsulated it, and returned it to you safely. They completed the work exactly as you contracted them to do. If they damaged the book while in their possession, then that would be a different story. The estimate gave you a free estimate that the grade would be. Unfortunately, you got what you paid for there. You paid for a certain amount of conservation work that was performed... fixing the spine roll, reattaching the pages, and cleaning & pressing the cover. You got those services, and they didn't improve the grade to your liking. But, you still received those services--even though they didn't improve the technical grade. Did you also pay to have the piece added to the back through leaf-casting, the spine split fixed, the tape residue to be removed, and stain removal? If you didn't pay $5,000 for this work, then those things weren't included in the conservation. Extensive restoration of comics is big bucks. Take a close look at the book--without comparing it to what it was before--and see if you feel it warrants a higher grade. If so, you have other options for grading companies. You could do a full restoration on it with leaf-casting of the missing piece from the middle of the back cover, have it aqueously cleaned to try to remove the tape residue, make tear seals on the spine split, and try to fade the stains with blue light treatment. But, is it really worth the cost of all of that restoration work to go from a 3.5 to a 4.0 or 4.5? You know the saying about putting lipstick on a pig. I am no CGC apologist--as I've had plenty of issues with them myself. However, in this case, I just don't see you have a valid gripe. I just think your expectations here were way off. The only thing that is going to satisfy you is to have this in a 4.5 or 5.0 slab. That's just not going to happen unless you fork over big money to a comic book conservationist. Sorry for the long comment, but I think a 34 minute video expresses your disappointment over your experience deserves a thought out response. Take it or leave it. By the way, here are the graders notes: married page(s) 16-19 piece out right center of back cover spine split bottom of spine tape stain bottom of spine creasing to cover interior spine reinforced leaf casting page 14-19 Conserved staining to cover tear seals bottom page 17 & 19 Conserved wear to cover
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
I appreciate the response. I'll have to agree to disagree that I am demanding Matt to teach me how to grade, as I never said that nor claimed that nor expected that nor asked that of him. I do expect him to at the very least explain to me why his assessment of the book and the graders assessment were so far apart (or at least how that can happen theoretically). As far as it being over graded in the first place, I can see how that would result in the same grade, however I also see that as a CGC problem. The grade should've been accurately assigned by them in the first place. I agree, grading is something that is a valuable skill and potentially could've helped me in this scenario. However I do not believe it unreasonable to lean on the expertise of the head grader of CGC for his professional opinion. Even if I had known how to grade at the time, his experience and knowledge dwarf mine, so I would defer to him. Just like one does in any service industry, you trust the recommendations of a mechanic or doctor or contractor because they in theory know a lot more than you do, right? I understand how you may think Matt went above and beyond for me, however I don't see how in any world he did so. Since you have worked customer service, you know that basic 101 steps to resolve customer service issues are first to apologize for the issue, then acknowledge the concern, resolve the issue, and then thank the customer for bringing the issue to light. Matt did absolutely none of those things. Not even the easy step of apologizing for a bad experience. How hard is that to do? Not. He failed 100% in my book. I agree that my expectations were way off, and again I lay the responsibility for that on Matt. I was not even sure the book would get a grade bump in the first place, I was just asking for advice on how to get the book completed and in the best condition possible. It was he who said he thought it would be at least a 4.5, possibly a 5.0 without mentioning any risk of it staying the same, yeah, that set expectations high for me, expectations I made a purchase decision on, and expectations that were not met in the final outcome. You mentioned that I will only be happy with the book in a 4.5 or 5.0 slab, however I disagree. I mentioned in the video that the solution I proposed was that CGC regrade the book at their cost, just to reassure me of the grade, even if it came back a 3.5 again. Matt was even unwilling to do something this small for me, again showing how he didn't really attempt to help me. I would have also ben happy with a refund as I felt taken by the whole experience. Lastly, you mention that there's nothing Matt can do if the book comes back a different grade than the opinion he gave and that it's unreasonable for me to expect him to fix it, especially since I did get services rendered to me. First off, there are things he could do, such as taking a look at the book again like I had suggested. He was unwilling. He also could've explained to me how there was such a discrepancy between his grade and the grade it got, he didn't. He could offer credit or a refund to help turn the negative experience into a positive one, he did not. And second, yes, the situation did and still does need fixing. The fact that I posted a video about my experience in my mind proves it hasn't been resolved for me and that it is in fact an issue. If nothing else, an apology for misguiding me would go a long way. Taking a second look at the book on CGC's dime would go further. Thirdly, as far as the services rendered, yes, I did receive the services. However, just like in every other service industry, companies have policies in place and offer solutions when inevitably customers are unhappy with the services they have been provided. It happens all the time. Customers are unhappy and companies offer solutions to remedy their experience. It's not unreasonable in my estimation to expect some kind of effort to compensate me for the fact that I was dissatisfied with the services CGC provided me, especially when it comes to the 7 months wait it took them to get the book back to me. Thanks again for the comment
@pbales8951
@pbales8951 4 месяца назад
@@momoonocollects Then I would sue Matt for every penny that you paid him for his opinion on what the potential grade would be.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
@@pbales8951 Thank you for your perspective on the video, I value responses to the content. Clearly we have different perspectives on what happened, so we'll have to agree to disagree. I wish you the best!
@cybergrindin
@cybergrindin 4 месяца назад
Took them 5.5 months for me to get my Jim lee signatures back.. it was in grading since Jan 3. I yelled at lady saying this is not excusable when comics that came out 2 weeks ago are already on the market! They shipped out same day and gave me $50 credit. Barely got books back April 2 2024
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Man, crazy. And during that time, the market can shift easy. Matt kept claiming that I should be happy because the book is worth more in a conserved grade and in a regular holder, but that's not true because in the seven months it took for me to get it back, the market kept dropping. So now I'm just holding it hoping it'll go back up until I can find a copy I can upgrade to. Ridiculous
@sylversyrfer6894
@sylversyrfer6894 4 месяца назад
CGC and Larsen are full of s*** Supremely unprofessional on their part.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
I thought so too
@dzetwo1
@dzetwo1 3 месяца назад
You are just a drop in the bucket and they don’t care and cgc service is horrible and eventually they will run out of books to grade and dry up
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 3 месяца назад
I agree, with one person it's hard to make a difference, it takes a village. It's an intersection point you bring up about running out of books. I wonder how much of that went into announcing the 9?9 prescreen so they can regrade books 🤔
@dzetwo1
@dzetwo1 3 месяца назад
@@momoonocollects sent you Instagram message last weekend
@JohnSmith-ib8qr
@JohnSmith-ib8qr 4 месяца назад
I sent in a triple cover and it took them 3-times to get it right. the 2-times earlier they never saw the other 2-covers after I wrote in large letters on the plastic sleeve, 3 COVERS ON THIS COMIC!!!! LOL! Best to go over Matt's head and get him fired! Terrible Service!
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
That's crazy! 😯 Don't know if you caught my other video about CGC, but they said during a panel at MegaCon that it takes about 10 seconds on average to grade a book, so no wonder they never saw the other covers, they're not spending enough time evaluating each book imo
@justplainoltex4991
@justplainoltex4991 4 месяца назад
This is a great metaphor for th problm w/comic nerds and why CGC is fkkng everyone on a daily basis. Nerds are such a kind and affable demographic that soulless entities w/out real competition take advantage of. There needs to be a new DEMAND-SIDE mkt rather than being told what th supply will be. Take it or leave it... our sht don't stink. Nerds have got to pick an agenda and go with it. Either decide yer in th hobby bc ya love th nature of th collectible, OR bc ya wanna do business. Ya gotta either be OK takin th loss at ebay, or OK just smellin th pulp. Ya can't have both and be happy about th hobby.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
I totally understand your sentiment. For now I'm more in the hobby because I love it, not so much the business side because that hasn't been as positive of an experience for me. I also agree there needs to be more real competition for CGC and that they shouldn't take advantage of people
@speedmetalcomics
@speedmetalcomics 2 месяца назад
Matt sounds pretty scummy in this whole interaction... Wow.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 2 месяца назад
That's definitely what I felt unfortunately. It sucks too because he seemed so nice at first Appreciate you watching the video 🙂
@xboxgamer3389
@xboxgamer3389 4 месяца назад
I’ve never pressed mainly because it says potentially could improve your grade which is from what I guess refers to anything non color breaking Or have the book look more presentable I don’t understand either how the spine looks better and fits a standard case but isn’t improved enough to get a better grade 😕 That doesn’t make sense why even do the service really sounds like he was trying to get you to pay again just for him to say sorry we tried but couldn’t improve anything There’s definitely a type of smugness with CGC they never used to let free accounts send them books which was always dumb you want to give them your business but couldn’t unless you paid money Now free members can send books but I don’t want to now after everything currently going on with them Also guarantee is in their name how you going to lean on the grade being an estimate Matt Nelson you’re not Certified Estimate Company 😂 as many books as he’s probably seen he shouldn’t have been as far off as he was the guy wrote a whole book about grading and couldn’t get your book correct
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Great point, and something I had been thinking about recently. How is it that the "godfather" of grading can be so far off on his assessment? Disappointing is an understatement
@gregmarshall2513
@gregmarshall2513 4 месяца назад
Comic grading is a bit like religion….even if they grade a book , it’s still subjective. Money for old rope .I’ll pass . Good video.
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Thanks, appreciate it! I agree, 100% grading is subjective 💯
@houseofelcomics3050
@houseofelcomics3050 4 месяца назад
Well there is alot there. You were talking to the head of the company and you didn't listen he was trying to tell you the grades are opinions and he couldn't grade it him self because that not his job anymore but the rest of the advice he gave you was right. Now is he a ass hole most likely but he did his best yes you should have ask anthor collector what to do as well they would have told you after submitting the book go through customer service I use cgc but don't get my hopes up good luck
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Appreciate the comments. I'll have to agree to disagree that he did his best to explain and that I didn't listen about his grades being opinions. He didn't answer the lion's share of my questions and I acknowledged numerous times that I understand that his grades are opinions. What I don't understand is how his opinions are so different that what the graders assigned. That's what I was trying to clarify. Also, respectfully, he was the head grader at the time, so it is his job to grade. I agree I should've gotten a second opinion, that's my fault. I also admitted that I probably should've gone to customer service to begin with, which I did after getting nowhere with Matt. It's just that we had already been emailing back and forth. Good luck to you, too
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
@@melw2100 I understand I wasn't going to get universal, and I wasn't looking for that. I understand that improvement doesn't always translate to higher grade, but the least he could do is explain why in this case (or even in a hypothetical case). I feel like I got screwed because Matt massively mislead me imo regarding a purchasing decision, and that's a non starter in my book. Not to mention the seven months it took to get the book back (time in which the comic market dropped) and the fact that when I went to him with questions and concerns, he did next to nothing. Zero customer service, complete apathy. And that's not to mention the terrible service I received over the phone when at least trying to get something back because of the wait time. All in all, horrible experience. I hate to think that this is happening to other people and how that impacts whether they leave the hobby
@jamesortiz3425
@jamesortiz3425 4 месяца назад
Story of my life!!!! 🤔
@momoonocollects
@momoonocollects 4 месяца назад
Right? 🤣 Sucks
Далее
Construction site video BEST.99
01:00
Просмотров 288 тыс.
Putin Əliyevdən nə istəyib? | Rəhim Qazıyev
05:32
CGC Insider: Publisher Defects
11:46
Просмотров 6 тыс.
All Your CGC 9.8 Comics Are Going to Zero!
39:14
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.
TONS of Grails and Rare Comics at Heroes Con! 🔥🔥🔥
1:14:11
Are Comic Books Good Investments? HOT TAKE! 🔥
30:28
Просмотров 2,1 тыс.
Is This Comic Really a CGC 9.9?
22:25
Просмотров 3,5 тыс.
I'm CRAZY! I Spent $10,000 on a COMIC BOOK! *Unboxing*
10:01
Construction site video BEST.99
01:00
Просмотров 288 тыс.