How DJI Fulfills Remote ID on Mobile and Why Pilot Privacy Is Pivotal with Brendan Schulman

Подписаться 67 тыс.

Просмотров 7 тыс.

50% 1

🔥Get Your Biggest and Most Common Drone Certificate Questions Answered by claiming our FREE Part 107 Guide NOW! - bit.ly/3iv3CbG
Analyzing DJI’s new Drone Remote ID System and how drone pilots can have a say in what's coming to the Drone industry.
Brendan Schulman, Vice President of Policy and Legal Affairs, DJI joins the podcast to discuss the new Drone to Phone application that DJI launched for mobile drone detection.
Pilots! Your time to speak up is coming in December with the NPRM. Like license plates, drones should have a level of privacy with pilots, do you agree?
Learn More - www.thedroneu....
Download and listen to the audio version of the Ask Drone U podcast, and get your drone and business related questions answered here: askdroneu.com/.
Please do us a huge favor, "Like" this video and "Subscribe" to our channel.
RU-vid URL for this video - • How DJI Fulfills Remot...
Become a Drone U member today. You'll enjoy unlimited access to over 30 courses, Part 107 training, and our amazing community! www.thedroneu....
Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes and, if you don't mind, leave us a 5-star review while you're there: itunes.apple.c....
Follow us:
Site - thedroneu.com/
Facebook - / droneu
Instagram - / thedroneu
Twitter - / thedroneu
RU-vid - / droneu
Get your copy of "Livin’ the Drone Life" - amzn.to/2IDbFTG
Get your copy of our Part 107 Study Guide - amzn.to/2IcLyDE
Purchase your own official Drone U Landing Pad here: thedroneu.clic...
Check out some of our favorite equipment:
Best Overall Drone: DJI Phantom 4 Pro (amzn.to/2jSJZMR)
Best Travel Drone: DJI Mavic Pro Platinum (amzn.to/2Ib0Jxr)
Best Cinema Drone: DJI Inspire 2 (amzn.to/2IAdH7a)
Best Mapping Drone: Yuneec H520 (amzn.to/2KUIxWB)
Crystal Sky Monitor (so you can fly without internet & with hot conditions) (amzn.to/2wAyPWh)
Crystal Sky Mount (amzn.to/2KV209q)
SD Cards for DSLR or Sony Mirrorless Cameras (amzn.to/2Ki4xti)
Phantom 4 Pro Propellers (amzn.to/2IaJRXu)
Phantom 4 Pro ND Filters (amzn.to/2KYFOeK)
Seagate DJI Fly Drive (amzn.to/2jQGcPZ)
Use T5 SSD to Edit Projects Faster (amzn.to/2Ia2NWi)
64gb Micro SD Card (amzn.to/2jVoc6V)
Timestamps
01:38 - How remote ID will mitigate risk and result in greater adoption of drone technology
04:26 - How ASTM International is devising a strategy to implement drone remote id
05:50 - Brendan explains the two ways via which remote id data and drone location can be transmitted
07:08 - Are there any issues when a network is used to transmit drone remote id data?
08:19 - DJI's new drone to phone remote ID system uses WiFi to transmit data - Does this setup raise any privacy concerns?
09:22 - Are privacy concerns justified? Will remote id data be accessible to public?
15:21 - Is drone to phone remote id similar to DJI Aeroscope?
18:52 - What macro effect will drone to phone remote id have on the drone industry as a whole?
23:52 - Can restricted/tiered access help address privacy concerns?
27:38 - Will DJI Mavic Mini be equipped with remote id capabilities?
33:35 - Brendan reiterates DJI's firm intention to ensure data security
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Please watch: "How FAA's NPRM for Remote ID for Drones Will Hurt Hobby Pilots or RC Pilots with Jon McBride"
• How FAA's NPRM for Rem...
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Get Your Biggest and Most Common Drone Certificate Questions Answered by Downloading this FREE Part 107 PDF - thedroneu.clic...

Опубликовано:

11 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 125

@elliothuh669 4 года назад

Imagine, flying having to talk to a bunch of people walking up to you. Who have the app. Your concentration should be on the flight not random strangers coming up to you.

@DroneU 4 года назад

Which is why every drone pilot should comment on the NPRM in December to make a point about the privacy of a pilots location to the public. Critical.

@jimsdroneing 4 года назад

properly means only authorities tracking not local individuals

@dogstar7 4 года назад

Thank you Paul and thanks to Brendan. I have been accused of posting alarmist comments regarding "Drone to Phone" proposal. Paul put my concerns to Brendan very succinctly about anyone being able stalk and "jack" a pilot on location. Brendan even mentioned the opportunity for a commercial rival to abuse this system. I'm sure Drone U will give us more information in December when comments open on this proposal so that we can become part of the discussion in a more organized and impactful way.

@VicMossPhotography 4 года назад

We will. It's very important!

@knowmacdonaldmedia 4 года назад

John of Drones know more concern about drone pilot being able to track and jack pilots on location than your vehicle being jack. If your concerned about being jack get your conceal carry permit and carry your firearm.

@dogstar7 4 года назад

@@knowmacdonaldmedia Thank you for helping to make my point.

@knowmacdonaldmedia 4 года назад

John of Drones You welcome

@davidwalker2402 4 года назад

Clarity is a wonderful thing, good job ....

@AirWorthyTours 4 года назад

So putting your customers in positions for armed robbery is advancing the industry further?

@davidwalker2402 4 года назад

If you bothered to watch the video you would clearly have heard that it is the FAA who are requesting this, yes America and the FAA want your data , what’s new about this .

@AirWorthyTours 4 года назад

David Walker so the FAA wants the general public to monitor the skies and the people who operate them. Sounds like a great way to move the industry further.

@davidwalker2402 4 года назад

Captain Philip try watching and listening to the video, although you are correct.

@VicMossPhotography 4 года назад

@@AirWorthyTours then make your concerns public by commenting once the NPRM drops. That is a very real concern, but as mentioned, not one of DJI's making. Congress is steering this in that direction.

@davidwalker2402 4 года назад

Captain

@adwenb 4 года назад

Give the general public access to the license number but not my location. Let the LEO have access to location especially when the drone is interfering with search and rescue and wild fire efforts.

@knowmacdonaldmedia 4 года назад

Really? How do you think general public gains access to individual license plate number? Which there own eyes. I’m sure your aware that people vehicle gets jack already without having access to your location via app? Pilots will just have to carry firearm if they are worried about there drone being jack. I carry firearm every time I fly

@pwidmayer 4 года назад

Paul thanks for asking questions we all wanted to know the answer to. A lot of good information in there.

@DroneU 4 года назад

Hey Paul, sweet name. - Paul.... In all honesty, thank you! I really appreciate your comment!. - PAA

@firebug185 4 года назад

I have an idea, how about giving the public access to the information only if the drone is so close to some one or building's in distance in which it is not allowed

@DroneU 4 года назад

Interesting approach.

@robertkoontz7865 4 года назад

Drone Jacking, Rival Stalkers are apparent. The one I fear is the Red Flag Drone Haters. Vendetta's

@chrisshorrock8982 4 года назад

Ask him why DJI NEVER has anyone to speak with in service. They avoid “Talking to a supervisor” like the plague. Their customer service SUCKS!!!

@apokalypseAATT 4 года назад

Chris Shorrock better ask them why they promote their drones with images / videos that are sooooo far from reality (like for example flying over/close to people) and why they never show the legal side of the drone biz in their social media stories/posts and instead introduce apps like this as silent as possible 🤔

@chrisshorrock8982 4 года назад

M M They are typical corporate butt munches!

@VicMossPhotography 4 года назад

Feel free to do that. That's not what this podcast was about.

@5zero7RC 4 года назад

Hey Paul, you should do a segment on the FPV Freedom Coalition and their efforts to keep the regulators informed that there are other kinds of "drones" out there getting caught up in all these rules. When the DAC is made up of almost nothing but commercial interests ( and one AMA member) they can easily forget that the recreational part of this even exists.

@jeremyboyce1537 4 года назад

This sounds like pure MADNESS.

@Herbie11 4 года назад

Just another reason I never update my DJI app or drone. Going on over a year now.

@kennyfoss8389 4 года назад

What about ALL sUAS? DJI does not speak for the community. They speak for themselves. If any organization speaks for the community it should be AMA with over 75 years of safe skies. DJI is a Chinese company. Who do we want to represent us?

@VicMossPhotography 4 года назад

It's obvious you did not listen to the podcast or you wound't ask this question. Brendan states quite clearly DJI isn't speaking for the community. Any more than AMA should be speaking for the community. AMA does not represent the commercial UAS pilots out there. I have no doubt they'll put out a memo to their members. And they should. But based on past memos, it will likely be something along the lines of "leave the hobby industry alone". That's the drum they've been beating since 2012. And that is a huge shame too. They were poised to be THE UAS voice in the U.S. But their "drones suck" attitude out of the gate dug themselves too deep of a hole to get out of. I know they're trying now, but it's too late. The UAS community has zero confidence in the AMA to speak for us. I'm predicting now that the AMA letter going out to it's members will include a copy and paste complaint (that does no good), and will basically say that hobby planes have been flying longer than the FAA has been around, and have a stellar safety record (all true), but then they'll say because of that no hobbyists should have to comply with RID. So they'll end up wasting not only the FAA's time, they'll end up wasting the time of their members who really should just educate themselves and each make a well thought out and educated comment after December 20th. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm probably not. The AMA has a very poor track record of helping when it comes to UAS legislation.

@rich500 4 года назад

I'll take DJI. They are lobbying congress in our interest. AMA wants us to be able to only fly at their approved sites, after we pay dues to a club and them.. Money talks, AMA walks.

@kennyfoss8389 4 года назад

@@VicMossPhotography Sorry you are wrong. I DID watch the entire interview. You can speak up for ALL commercial pilots. I speak up for the hobbyists. AMA has rules of flight for ALL its members...hobbyists. I fly only quads in my club. So don't for one moment think I am a fixed wing pilot, but my friends do fly them. DJI would like to speak for everyone so they can rule the quad world. Why do you think they sent you a FREE MM? They want their way or the highway. You are being bribed to follow them like a lemming. Sure they will put some device on their quads to ID their product to the detriment of all other manufacturers. Dominate the market. The LAANC system does work. You use it more than likely and so do I. We don't need any more means to ID ourselves. One last thought. The horse (quads)is out of the barn and no amount of rules are going to stop the rule breaker. If someone wants to do their own thing, they will. So legislate and penalize all us sUAS folks for the guys who don't give a crap about the rules.

@VicMossPhotography 4 года назад

@@kennyfoss8389 If you watched the video, I guess I'm confused why you would say that DJI is speaking for the community. They obviously aren't, and know the futility of trying to do so. There are plenty of other manufacturers, albeit none as large as DJI. They are also developing their RID systems for when (not if) that rule goes into effect. And they didn't send me a free MM, they sent one to Paul. I have my own that I bought with my own money. I rarely review products that are given to me. I can think of only one instance in the past. As far as flying at an AMA field, maybe that's one of the exemptions for the need to use RID? As a matter of fact, that's probably a darn good idea. Suggest that in your comments on the NPRM. And yes, we do need more means to ID ourselves if we're flying outside an AMA field. It's a logical condition, and one that is in the works. Wishing it away is an exercise in futility and frustration. Let's take a possible project I'll be doing next summer. I may be flying and covering parades. And if I get my 107.39 waiver, I'll be doing that over people. Supposed someone else is doing the same thing, yet doing so illegally? How is an LEO going go differentiate between my safe and legal flight, and someone else's unsafe and illegal one? RID will do that. You shouldn't equate legislation with penalization. They're not necessarily the same thing. Flying in the NAS is a privilege, not a right. And there need to be safeguards and rules to do so (just like AMA has at their fields). RID is just one aspect of that system. And I will agree with you that no amount of rules will stop the rule breaker. By definition they won't. So that isn't even part of the logical discussion here. Rules are like locks, they only apply to those willing to follow them. But without any rules and laws, it's anarchy. There is no perfect system out there. But we should never let perfect be the enemy of good. RID is a good and workable system. We as a community just need to make sure it's a viable one for both the hobby and commercial sides of this industry.

@stephencarlson6297 4 года назад

@@VicMossPhotography That you are flying at an AMA field or not should not be a differentiating factor for if you must have RID or not, to do so would essentially turn the AMA into an arm of the government (which is what they seem to want, let's them wield a weapon to force membership). I'm not in favor of RID, not just due to the asymmetric burden of having to be implemented on both hand-build R/C plane verses mass-produced drone, but also that it sets a precedent that all other forms of aviation must also be so "tagged". You are essentially pushing for Ultralights, Skydivers, Powered-Paragliders, Hang Gliders, model rockets, balloons, kites, and everything else to have RID. That the vehicle is caring a human or not is irrelevant; let both manned and unmanned aircraft use the same airspace, the differentiating factor in if required to use RID should only be the classification of the given airspace being utilized. I'm flying in Class G: I'm not doing RID.

@robopam 4 года назад

No more government intrusion into our hobbies and vocations! It's never a good thing.

@laurenceminuto8769 4 года назад

Will Drone U help and provide links to these these areas where we pilots and address or concerns on the policies?

@VicMossPhotography 4 года назад

Yes, once the NPRM is released, we'll have a set of suggestions and a link to the NPRM. Stay tuned...

@brucelinton3071 4 года назад

ID (License plate) openly broadcasted in the event of a complaint. Location of and information on the registered owner only available to Law Enforcement to investigate legitimate complaints or investigating crimes. This system is in place now for all motor vehicles legally driven on our roads and freeways.

@henrytong8707 4 года назад

Not skateboards, electric scooters or bicycles.......They are far more dangerous than Drones.

@brendanschulman9971 4 года назад

@@henrytong8707 When is the last time a skateboard shut down an airport?

@henrytong8707 4 года назад

You mean the time they found a non-existent drone in Gatwick? Hipsters hit me twice with a skateboard on the sidewalk. I never had a drone drop on my head.

@henrytong8707 4 года назад

After hearing this, I just sold my DJI Mavic 2 Zoom on Ebay. Got $1206.00 for it. This information should only be used to avoid collision with other aircraft. I thought that was what LAANC is for. "Drone haters" should not have access to it. This is some crazy scheme DJI is dreaming up.

@VicMossPhotography 4 года назад

You obviously didn't listen to the podcast. This is FAA and HSA mandated. Period. DJI is NOT the only company doing this. They actually have the best, cheapest, and easiest system.

@kennyfoss8389 4 года назад

@@VicMossPhotography Who says? They are still in the exploration phase. LAANC works. To fly you should know the rules of flight. Beyond that is over reach.

@steve_beatty 4 года назад

@@VicMossPhotography ..F the FAA and anyone who embraces this nonsense.I've been flying for over 30 years under the reasonable exception to 306 (?) and have taught others as young as 12 to fly ...if The FAA and DJI have their way the 12 year olds will have to be 16 before even considering flight and we will lose them which is what the FAA wants so they can regulate Amazons new air traffic lanes more efficiently..The self important largely untalented flight wise camera barge operators forget their activities affect about 1000 other recreational flyers to their one occasional use flyer.

@1949rgs 4 года назад

Will it be possible to retrofit existing drones for remote ID?

@b2bmail 4 года назад

I believe it will be done with firmware updates for those that have the capacity.

@DroneU 4 года назад

Most of the drones that are sold are already setup for it. Mavic 2 Pro, Mavic 2 Zoom, Mavic Enterprise, Mavic Air.

@5zero7RC 4 года назад

@Sasha Kruse Grim For anyone out there who is an FPV flyer and is concerned about these regulations, check out the FPV Freedom Coalition. Also, there is one more option that was not really discussed in this video. That option to comply with remote id is for the "unequipped" drones. A.K.A, those that don't have wifi or any other broadcast capabilities. The proposal is that you could use a system almost identical to LAANC to plot out your flights. Not perfect, but it is something for the DIY folks like myself.

@redhulkultra155 4 года назад

@@DroneU what about older drones like mavic pro platinum?

@redalrt4 4 года назад

As the proposed rules stand, any drone kit not 100% constructed from FAA-approved remote ID parts is considered "amateur built" and it may only be flown in an FAA-recognized identification area (FRIA’s).

@Ryder_Studios 4 года назад

So now that the proposal has been released, would this app meet the requirements as it's written currently?

@DroneManMurphy 4 года назад

Great idea: improve public confidence by being able to see the drone ID and to maybe have flight mission info show as well. Also let first responders and law officers know where the pilot is located. 👍 BAD IDEA: giving the general public the ability to disrupt, harass or interrupt a pilot in the middle of a flight! 😬 Common sense slaps that idea in the face! 😊

@rich500 4 года назад

In the end if we are subject to this all aircraft must be subject, which is not the case now. Balloons and powered parachute aircraft are not even restricted with an agl. These aircraft are flying in drone airspace Class G. Also this a pipe dream of crying security. No terrorist is going to subject himself to this plan. This will ultimately result in pilots having to get a permit to carry for self protection.

@VicMossPhotography 4 года назад

Balloons and powered parachutes are easy to find and track. Drones aren't. That's the issue for RID and drones. People need to know who is in the air, and RID will give them that option. But, and this is very important, it can't give people instant access to the location of the pilot. That needs to be reserved for those with a legal and compelling need to know.

@rich500 4 года назад

@@VicMossPhotography Not true. How does the FAA find the powered parachute flying 150 feet over my house and neighbors.After he's landed and put aircraft in his barn. FAA does not show up while he's flying over.

@VicMossPhotography 4 года назад

@@rich500 this is getting off subject and too far into the weeds. I suggest you formulate a well thought out response for the NPRM and include it in the requested comments section thereon. RID is happening, there is nothing you can do to stop it.. You're much better off expending your energies on suggesting its best fit and benefit for the community rather than arguing that it shouldn't happen. In your case, those energies would better benefit the hobby community.

@steve_beatty 4 года назад

Watch for the new Frisbee regulations in 2020...There'll be a new arm of the FAA of course...fees, fines, proficiency tests...There are thousands of gun related deaths every year from largely unregulated guns...Guess how many died from hobby quadcopters ??

@steve_beatty 4 года назад

If I find any RID junk in any flying toy I own I'll either disable it or smash it with a hammer....following with public outings in as many forums I can find of their idiocy...friends don't let friends fly DJI junk..

@fatherofbirds 4 года назад

Any know if the DJI smart controller is going to be able to have remote ID

@axxatube 4 года назад

Never mind. Got it. Keep up the good work. Love this channel.

@davidhbedenham4951 4 года назад

Greetings from Cyprus. Great video with an interesting topic. I have no problem with a 'digital license plate' being available when I am flying, but personal data about me as a drone pilot should only be available to the legal authorities NOT the general public. There are some real crazies out there folks. Cheers

@axxatube 4 года назад

I'm late to this video. @ 6:00 min, Schulman outlines 2 ways the DJI remote id system would work. The audio and video is garbled and undecipherable during the explanation of the *first* method. What was it?

@3dprintwiz378 4 года назад

I know I am late to the party already, but may I ask if they already implemented this? Is the app available already? Lastly is this going to be applied to all DJI owners without considering which country they belong to? I really hope they do not apply this in asia. Boy was I so wrong in buying a DJI Mavic Mini. I should have bought the other brands.

@IanB1015 4 года назад

I think that LE / Gov having access to pilot data would be okay. I don't do anything illegal when i fly and usually if not always have a friend there as a spotter. But i am not comfortable with some random person walking up and harassing me when i am not bothering anyone. Will be adding this to the survey thingy

@elliothuh669 4 года назад

Anyone have a link or know where to find the NPRM for remote ID? Google doesnt want to cooperate. Perhaps, its postponed yet again.

@alexnm2883 4 года назад

Remote ID should only broadcast the serial number of registered drones. All around the world we are having to register our drones to get autorization to fly with them. If someone is doing something they are not suppost to be doing, the drone police could get the app, retrieve the drone registration ID, acess the drone registration database for that country and get the pilot information. If the drone is not registrated, then it should broadcast the drone pilot location because he is doing something ilegal ( I don't agree, but if we need to registrate it to be able to fly and we are not doing what the law says, then we would be doing something ilegal, right? )

@blt1 4 года назад

If the FAA wants to treat these as aircraft, as the rules apply to navigable airspace, then they should only require them to squawk 1200. Airplanes with N numbers aren't required to transmit anything more. Just say NO to remote ID!

@tap364 4 года назад

Exactly. There is no personal info broadcast from VFR manned aircraft while squawking 1200. In fact, the FAA will say that low flying drone transponders would not even be picked up by ATC. This proves that this is not about safety for manned aircraft flying above 500'. This is strictly to free the 0-400' airspace for autonomous delivery drones flying BVLOS. The RC / drone hobbyist and small part 107 flyers be damned.

@DanaCrosby 3 года назад

18 to 36 month will be incorporated

@JonniArmani 4 года назад

Great info,)

@droneshots8247 4 года назад

ok i need to know every time a planes coming

@genegreneker533 4 года назад

The FAA discusses that all of this is being done to integrate UAVs into the airspace plan. Yet, drones and other UAV are currently segregated to the lower 400 feet, and neither system for ID and location will produce location data that will be made available to the air traffic controller responsible for the airspace where the UAV is being flown in real time. So what is the real purpose of all of this? It is not to make the airspace a safer place using the proposed system. If there are over 400 people killed each year in General Aviation accidents (many on the ground) and this has been the trend for at least 10 years and the FAA does nothing to improve these statistics, then by definition, the loss of 400 people a year to General Aviation accidents is below the threshold of concern. Yet, there is not one proven case of a UAV killing anyone in the past 10 years and the FAA is going bats to solve the safety problem that does not exist. And anyone believes that the FAA is going to consider our input? The die is already cast, but if they are overwhelmed with comments, it will take them longer to wade through the comments and that will give all of us more time before we have to scrap most of our current drones that will never meet the requirements. There are 1.5 million recreational flyers and another 500,000 107 pilots. If everyone files, someone might get the message.

@adwenb 4 года назад

Since I am a novice drone pilot don’t think some person that wants my drone should have access to my location. DJI Pro, 7.8 inch crystal sky and a hard case to hold it all is a big investment for me. Imagine what the pros use, easily 10K why should some clown that just wants my equipment have my location.

@leeespinosa5485 2 года назад

I’m being harassed by a drone that follows me every night in two different state’s cali and Arizona. I’m gonna get a go pro so I can record them so people believe me. And I’m no drug kingpin. So i dont understand why …. Straight up harassment and last I’ve known harassment is illegal. They need to be held accountable

@sbright33 4 года назад

Ive had numerous incidents of violence where a police report was filed some of them I wasn't even flying

@genegreneker533 4 года назад

People on community web sites have made the statement that they will shoot down any drones over their property. ID the pilot and where does the FAA think that might lead. ID bad idea. Also, the data goes into a data base. If the drone is a couple of hundred feet over the altitude allowed, the data supplied to the data base could be self incriminating which brings up Constitutional issues regarding the right not to self incriminate. Will the police officers be trained to the level of a 107 pilot so they are aware of all the complexity associated with a flight, like a drone pilot is on an photo flight 3 miles from the airport with a waiver. I think that turning Barney Fife loose with a receiver is going to create some real problems, unless Barney holds a 107 certificate and fully understands how the drone is being operated and that it is legal. Who has time to play 20 questions with anyone especially a police officer while flying a mission. Sir do you you have proper credentials? Yes, wait a moment for me to land and get out my wallet. Sir I need to see your credentials now!!! Please, let me land this 5 pound drone for the safety of it and all on the ground. Sir put you hands behind your back you are not obeying a lawful command. Please it will only take another 3 minutes to return. Put the transmitter down and place you hands behind your back..........

@knowmacdonaldmedia 4 года назад

All pilots should not be concerned about there privacy in regards to be jack from some person looking to steel your equipment no more than people steeling your vehicle which cost way more than your drone costs. If your worried about being jack, go and get conceal carry permit and carry firearm. I don’t fly without carrying firearm.

@MrEye4get 4 года назад

Imagine how the public would react if the Government required every citizen to wear a GPS tracker, just in case they should decide to act criminally. The license plate registration database is NOT accessible by the pubic.

@scarakus 4 года назад

Was gonna buy a mini last week, but not since they're gonna do this. I'll stick with my blade chroma, no one can read the ID on it.

@okanaganpeterjames 4 года назад

You can't escape the government. This system will be coming to all drone platform's

@scarakus 4 года назад

@@okanaganpeterjames not mine, cuz mine doesn't connect to my phone, my controller has a video screen built in. and i delete the gpx data generated after every flight.

@okanaganpeterjames 4 года назад

@@scarakus and if you are caught flying like that what do you think will be the consequence?

@ninotravis1341 4 года назад

802.11 technology has its origins in a 1985 ruling by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission that released the ISM band[1] for unlicensed use. In 1991 NCR Corporation/AT&T (now Nokia Labs and LSI Corporation) invented a precursor to 802.11 in Nieuwegein, the Netherlands. The inventors initially intended to use the technology for cashier systems. The first wireless products were brought to the market under the name WaveLAN with raw data rates of 1 Mbit/s and 2 Mbit/s. Vic Hayes, who held the chair of IEEE 802.11 for 10 years, and has been called the "father of Wi-Fi", was involved in designing the initial 802.11b and 802.11a standards within the IEEE.[ The segment of the radio frequency spectrum used by 802.11 varies between countries. In the US, 802.11a and 802.11g devices may be operated without a license, as allowed in Part 15 of the FCC Rules and Regulations. Frequencies used by channels one through six of 802.11b and 802.11g fall within the 2.4 GHz amateur radio band. Licensed amateur radio operators may operate 802.11b/g devices under Part 97 of the FCC Rules and Regulations, allowing increased power output but not commercial content or encryption. The major commercial breakthrough came with Apple Inc. adopting Wi-Fi for their iBook series of laptops in 1999. It was the first mass consumer product to offer Wi-Fi network connectivity, which was then branded by Apple as AirPort.[8][9][10] One year later IBM followed with its ThinkPad 1300 series in 2000.

@sirgigolo 4 года назад

It’s becoming too much of a hassle to fly drones. I’m really thinking of selling my drones

@okanaganpeterjames 4 года назад

All human beings are tracked from birth. Drones allow people to see the world literally as free as a bird. Government needs to tie the drone to their person and be able to track where it goes because that's what the government does. Even if it is free they will charge drone pilots a monthly fee as well.

@christopherhaslewood6081 4 года назад

Very Dangerous !! Out flying on my own with £1000.00 equipment If my location can be seen by Jo Public this is Ideal for the Thugs and against Drone hunters

@johnabelljr1997 4 года назад

People are so paranoid. Just have the drone transmit a license number and be done with it.

@jeremyboyce1537 4 года назад

Do drone pilots really have a say?if they did would all these regulations be so inevitable?

@basspig 4 года назад

I'm beginning to regret having registered my drone. I should have kept it secret.

@johnabelljr1997 4 года назад

If they start charging fees, I'll be selling my drone. I don't fly it all that much and its just for fun and I follow all the FAA rules.

@bluegrassdroneguy3495 4 года назад

🤔hmm

@eqbviewllc7111 4 года назад

the FAA (and similar equivalents around the globe) needs to have an OPEN Forum for feedback by the users. Having OEMs who will benefit from future 'requirements' is a self-licking ice cream cone . . . they will continue to make requirements that they can make money on.

@VicMossPhotography 4 года назад

That is what the public comment period for the upcoming NPRM is for. Make sure you make your voice known when that comes out.

@apokalypseAATT 4 года назад

Moss Photography that for the US. what about us guys in the EU? Or should we wait until the FAA decides, and then, in a typical EU way, just copy the American model... and by doing so, violating our just introduced, brand new (and good) data privacy protection laws 🤷🏻‍♂️

@VicMossPhotography 4 года назад

@@apokalypseAATT that's between you and the EU. That's not what this podcast is about.

@apokalypseAATT 4 года назад

Moss Photography is that the only song your radio plays? „That’s not what this podcast is about“? 🤔😅 you answer that quite often here. This podcast is EXACTLY about that. It’s a very sensible topic, it raises many good questions. And it shows how poorly some parties involved in this act (wink wink DJI) If you wanna be uncle sam‘s favorite good poppy, feel free to do so. But let those of use who think outside the box make comments, share opinions and ask questions. Thanks 👍

@VicMossPhotography 4 года назад

@@apokalypseAATT not sure what you mean, but the podcast was talking about FAA rules. Which by the way, are very similar to EU rules. You can belittle us all you want, but if you're familiar with what we do at Drone U, you'll fully know that we are not Uncle Sam's favorite good puppy (whatever the hell that is). I've found over the years when someone runs out of viable arguments they tend to resort to name calling. I guess that's what your'e doing above. Opine to your heart's content, but we have no plans to discuss EU policy in the near future. Maybe when ICAO gets it's act together and we get cross-border regulations, but it's unlikely until then.

@jeremyboyce1537 4 года назад

This whole thing is making me so mad,all these rules every time you look, another one,they will soon bann drones all together watch and see.

@MikeSpeekman 4 года назад

Let people just enjoy their hobby, without interference from the Government. How many drones have killed people so far and how many guns are being used daily to kill people? And yet they are NOT banned??? Only in the good ol' USA

@jeremyboyce1537 4 года назад

Well get remote ID for guns.

@salrizzo3016 4 года назад

I don’t think just anyone should be fine location of the operating operating most of the time something that’s a couple thousand dollars with all your equipment which is Rob from you with someone that just has a cell phone and sees it and Wants to steal it was some crazy unhinged person I think you were spying on them because they saw a drone because that’s what most of society’s thoughts are they see something up in the sky and buy them automatically there you go is always looking at me or we could care less about that it might be a couple of freaks out there but maybe there’s a license that they can report it to the police and the police can look up where the person is an approach them and see where they flew

@ProBroDougB 4 года назад

So the DJI salesman thinks that remote ID is a great thing. Of course he does....his company has built a solution for a problem that doesn't exist. They need to convince and tell people there is a huge problem, so they can sell their solution.

@joewilson9744 4 года назад

I don't have a problem with law enforcement, and government, having this information. The problem I have is some nut job being able to come to my location, as I'm flying, and take their paranoia out on me. False accusations will become rampant. This guy is talking through his ass. DJI is a willing participant in kicking the hobbyist out of the sky. They want the big business and government contracts, not some weekend flier. Time to put the Phantom 3 4K on eBay and tell DJI to kiss our hind parts. I may even be nice and take a shower beforehand!