How do new Russian glide bombs compare to NATO's glide bombs?

Подписаться 864 тыс.

Просмотров 181 тыс.

50% 1

This video explores glide bombs as a concept, and goes in depth on several of the more common models. How do glide bombs compare with regular bombs and missiles in general? And how do US JDAM-ER, SDB and JSOW bombs compare with the likes of Russian ones like GROM 2 and UMPK kits.
Music by Matija Malatestinic www.malatestini...
If you want to watch our videos without ads, if you want quick replies to any questions you might have, if you want early access scripts and videos, monthly release schedules - become our Patron.
More here: / binkov
Get Binkov plushies here:
crowdmade.com/...
You can also browse for other Binkov merch, like T-Shirts, via the store at our website, binkov.com
Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos! / @binkov
Follow Binkov's news on Facebook! / binkovsbattlegrounds
Follow us on Twitter: / commissarbinkov

Опубликовано:

12 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 795

@KarlKarpfen 10 месяцев назад

There is one little mistake in your video, probably from the confusing mess of naming US- and generally NATO-ammunition. JDAM is the glide kit for Mk.-80 series bombs, not a bomb, JDAM-ER is the variant with a rocket booster to extend the range. So the bombs are: Mk.-82, Mk.-83, Mk.-84, BLU-109, BLU-110, BLU-111 The glide kit without a retrofit rocket booster is: JDAM The glide kit with a retrofit rocket booster is: JDAM-ER

@iamscoutstfu 10 месяцев назад

This is incorrect

@ImBigFloppa 8 месяцев назад

The JDAM-ER is just a JDAM variant that has a wing kit to glide to the target. The normal JDAMs fly on a ballistic trajectory

@kameronjones7139 10 месяцев назад

Small diameter glide bombs are terrifying especially with stealth aircraft like the f35.The first version can pen 3 feet of concrete at 69 miles away while the second one can hit non moving targets 69 miles away and moving one 45 miles. 8 of these can fit inside an f35 or 20 in non stealth mode

@secessionnow4133 10 месяцев назад

No such thing as stealth aircraft. It’s a lie.

@willswenson3169 10 месяцев назад

@@secessionnow4133or you simply fail to understand what "stealth" means. When someone says "stealth aircraft", what do you envision?

@willswenson3169 10 месяцев назад

@SaintFluffySnowstill better than anything Russia or China has fielded.

@blink182bfsftw 10 месяцев назад

@SaintFluffySnowmight wanna look up how B2 bombers destroyed Iraqi air defenses supplied by Russia

@JohnMaxGriffin 10 месяцев назад

@@secessionnow4133You’re in for a big surprise then

@ewok40k 10 месяцев назад

that poor M48 minding own business when suddenly a wild Maverick appears...

@kameronjones7139 10 месяцев назад

He was just enjoying retirement too

@7891ph 10 месяцев назад

I'm having flashbacks to the first Gulf War in Iraq; watching videos of laser guided bombs hitting air shafts, and a BBC video of a Tomahawk coming down the street over the camera crews head and hanging a right turn at the end of the block...

@zNaYuz 10 месяцев назад

Even if the receiving side have enough air defense to block all or most glide bombs, it's still a good exchange. For every glide bomb to be shot down, it's required as least a missile costing 4-10x that bomb. The exchange rate is not as good as cheap drone vs AA missile but still a good game to take.

@stevebuckley7788 10 месяцев назад

Glide bombs can be shot down will radar guided AA guns like Gepard or Shilka. They are "as slow as fuck" and the wings are easily damaged so they are only useful in areas without air defenses. This is why Russia is now able to use them on the front lines in Ukraine whereas they could not at the start of the war.

@zNaYuz 10 месяцев назад

Yes, they can be shot down with radar guided AA guns. But the range those guns can cover is really limited and integrated infrared missile can't target cold missile like glide bombs. You can cover some most important assets, but the rest is undefended. You need radar guided AA missile to effectively block most of glide bombs, which is impratical in term of wallet and stockpile. It's just like how Hamas overwhelmed Israel's Iron Dome recently. Why wouldn't Israek build something like C-RAM to shoot down rocket with cheap price instead of using expensive missile cost 50-100x what it shot down? Simply because the range of gun is very limited.@@stevebuckley7788

@Archer89201 10 месяцев назад

The main attraction of glide/precision kits is that they are cheaper than missiles, also the huge arsenal built up during cold war means the bombs are available making it very cheap and the planes remain safe from SAMs and AAA while lobbing hard to see bombs without dedicated systems

@piotrd.4850 10 месяцев назад

Binkov forgot most important breakthrough: cheap, reliable, somewhat accurate solid state INERTIAL measurement units.

@jdogdarkness 10 месяцев назад

One thing Binkov is minimizing is, in peer v peer war you would be lobbing these from OUTSIDE enemy territory. Shaping operations would take place to push back GBAD & the frontline, while advancing safe(er) airspace further & further. Nevermind stealth (which also works similarly)

@PeterMuskrat6968 10 месяцев назад

Yup. The nation that doesn’t train their pilots for SEAD/DEAD missions is the nation that is going to lose the war.

@AlexTorres-qv3hv 5 месяцев назад

Another Binkov's video that didn't age well??🤔

@chaz706 10 месяцев назад

The answer is quite obvious from an engineering standpoint: bombs are really dangerous when they hit their target due to the sheer explosive force of the bomb. None of that power means anything if you miss. Anything that makes it easier and safer to reliability and consistently take something like a bomb and deliver it to target accurately is going to almost erase the primary weakness of heavy bombs. You're turning a powerful but somewhat cumbersome weapon into a precision weapon with all of the previous strengths and few of those weaknesses.

@beepboop204 10 месяцев назад

also: sky divers became squirrel-suited-gliders. coincidence? or the THC in my system? you be the judge

@charlie15627 10 месяцев назад

There was a report of a "Grom" being used just a couple days ago. That's the first confirmed use of it that I'm aware of.

@paulpowell4871 10 месяцев назад

Always a pleasure and a great source of information. A true treasure of the information age! BINKOV!!!!!

@Jaxymann 10 месяцев назад

I think one of the reasons glide bombs are popular is economics - why use larger, more expensive missiles like a Maverick against small ground targets like tanks/APCs when a Small Diameter Bomb can achieve the same result at lower cost? That way, larger ordinance is saved for priority targets.

@JoseTorres-ry9qe 6 месяцев назад

Glide bombs could bring Zepplins back, as they would only need to maximize vertical altitude and feature some form of launcher to leverage the defensive and offensive capabilities of range. Theyd literally have to go straight up, as cheaply as possible, as far as possible, with as much ordnance as possible.

@petergerdes1094 10 месяцев назад

So is the era of glide bomb kits inevitably limited? Won't new bombs just be built with integrated wings and only the guidance module needs to be swapped in?

@jaimemartinez9792 10 месяцев назад

These kits are made to be strapped onto an existing dumb bomb, and there are tons of dumb bombs already in existence. Plus we are not going to stop making dumb bombs anytime soon because they are dirt cheap and effective. Although, if we did stop making bombs then I bet a tail kit for a 155 mm artillery round isn't that far behind.

@cedriceric9730 10 месяцев назад

It already happened with the sdb

@justacomment1657 10 месяцев назад

@@jaimemartinez9792a tail attachment for an artillery she'll doesn't seem feasible to me. the thing would have to be directly exposed to the propellent detonation... not easy at best

@kit888 10 месяцев назад

Don't forget the glsdb - ground launched sdb. As for turbojets being expensive, a rocket boosted ramjet should be cheaper.

@cz1589 10 месяцев назад

Yep, a missed chance to note it! It will be deployed soon. Range of 150km. And a mass product in time, optional to be delivered by thousands to Ukraine.

@196cupcake 10 месяцев назад

This is good. I knew of glide bombs, but hadn't seen a comparison in one place. In a drawn out conflict, I think you have a video about this, glide bombs would play a big role after smart weapons are depleted, especially if the industrial base has been partially destroyed. I'd like to think the Pentagon has plans in place for how to surge glide kits if it ever comes to that.

@joblo341 10 месяцев назад

Funny thing, your example is the "obsolete" A-10 with a load of 16 GBU-39 bombs ... As well as glide bombs, cruise missiles are a good choice if your enemy does not have long enough range anti-air. Excellent report. You've made several points I have not seen in other sources. Thanks!

@jameslooker4791 10 месяцев назад

The SDB was tasked with fitting in the same dimensional space as an AIM-120 AMRAAM so wings was about the only option while still retaining a decent payload.

@andrewworth7574 10 месяцев назад

It's taking surprisingly long for them to invent glide torpedoes. A weapon equipped with hydroplanes, positively buoyant and released by a submarine at depth against ships.

@kcharles8857 10 месяцев назад

I think these (or something very similar) are currently under development. There is an Autonomous Underwater Vessel 'Ghost Shark' designed and built in Australia in the trial stage at the moment. I believe it has a mission specific capability, which would include a high explosive package when needed. Probably not what you had in mind but getting there :)

@KonradvonHotzendorf 10 месяцев назад

That would increase drag. Slow the torpedo and decrease its range Modern torpedoes maneuver up and down and try to explode underneath a ship

@andrewworth7574 10 месяцев назад

@KonradvonHotzendorf no motor, no propeller. It's propelled by the interaction of its initial depth, buoyancy, and hydroplanes in the same way a glide bomb used altitude, weight, and wings. It wouldn't be fast, but it would be extremely quiet and so stealthy. Military submarines almost never use active sonar, relying instead on passive sonar.

@KonradvonHotzendorf 10 месяцев назад

@@andrewworth7574 Oh now I get it That's interesting

@JClark2600 10 месяцев назад

Kind of makes you wonder why the US retired the AC-130W

@user-em2eb6bu6t 10 месяцев назад

I would love to see a video of why Aircraft cannot launch missiles to intercept Sam missiles homing them. It seems to be easier than intercepting missiles (Iron Dome) attacking random targets.

@cedriceric9730 10 месяцев назад

Sams come in mach 2 and above even mach 5 !! They have ALL the advantage, at best youll be in the greatest defensive dance of your life , maneuvering your aircraft to its very limit! By the time your defensive missile gets up to speed , everything will be OVER

@Slavic_Goblin 10 месяцев назад

Oversimplified, SAM missiles are pretty darn fast, and you generally want to your interceptor missile to be faster than the missile being intercepted.

@ToastyMozart 10 месяцев назад

Probably because it'd require the pilot to keep the front-facing radar to remain pointed to where it can track the incoming SAMs, which means evasion's going to be nearly impossible if the interceptor misses. That and the matter of saturation, since a bunch of trucks on the ground can carry way more missiles than a fighter jet.

@kurtwicklund8901 10 месяцев назад

I expected the HIMARS launched version to be part of this review. It is the exact same SDB just put into motion by a missile.

@goodiezgrigis 9 месяцев назад

So... Ivan sips his morning vodka before firing up a welder and a grider to make a dozen bombs from 60's glide and clocks out his shift. Meanwhile a team of US engineers spends thousands of dollars to reinvent the wheel. Sounds about right.

@kailiciousthumbsup 9 месяцев назад

And said wheel will be bested by either iran,the taliban ,iraqies the list goes on

@conqueror_the_based 9 месяцев назад

@@kailiciousthumbsupbetter than 3-d world countries? What a cope 😂

@TheWizardGamez 5 месяцев назад

Proven reliability, standardization making swap outs and field repairs easy, and most of all, scale. While Russia is just now employing in a serious manner PGMs, we’ve been using them for 20+ years now in high numbers. Jamming? Yeah, we built inertial navigation in. You can’t trick the bomb.

@ycplum7062 10 месяцев назад

It should be noted that air defense ranges are not ao definitive. For example, an air defense system may detect an aircraft 300 km away and its SAM may reach out to 250 km. However, the radar may not be able to track an aircraft till it is within 150 km. Then there is something called the "no escape" zone. If a fighter spots a missile launch early enough, it can turn around and outrun the missile. Within, the no escape zone, the aircraft cannot outrun the missile and will need to evade or use other countermeasures to survive. This no escape zone varies with the missile and aircraft. However, the no escape zone may be only 100 km. If so an attack aircraft can launch a glide bomb outside the no escape zone and then runaway.

@johnwalsh4857 10 месяцев назад

well as Ukrainian soldiers commented, the Russian glide bombs are inaccurate however they make it up for blast radius , FAB500 bombs are big so if its a near miss, the shockwave alone is deadly. however from what I hear many miss with a long distance

@DanielNotWise 10 месяцев назад

Well anything what one side is reporting about the other side of this war is propaganda bullshit.

@super-cat4781 10 месяцев назад

Of course, the Ukrainian considered it inaccurate, because whoever sees it is already dead.

@DumRock1 10 месяцев назад

i see many videos that this bomb pretty accurate

@pac1fic055 10 месяцев назад

Fritz X enters the chat. All aforementioned glidebombs: Hallo, Opa!

@george1737 5 месяцев назад

Bla bla bla and the channel is professional, Russia is weak, nato and usa has top tech but somehow the weak is winning both economically and militarily hahaha go and wash after pho.

@TheJimmyplant 3 месяца назад

Yeah you see nato is not fighting Russia. A single country is fighting Russia. With assistance sure. If it was nato against Russia you vodka loving depressed losers would be done

@firstcynic92 10 месяцев назад

How well do glide bombs stand up to AAA fire? In particular from very high rate of fire 20-30mm cannons?

@override367 10 месяцев назад

Russia would have to actually use their planes in a strike role for them to matter

@Native_love 9 месяцев назад

ACME rockets had a Wile E. Coyote guided missile back in the 1950's! They were so far ahead of their time!

@jimkeats891 9 месяцев назад

I'm 100% sure that Mr. Coyote formed Raytheon.

@farright118 10 месяцев назад

i feel like this could have been a 5 mins video

@TK199999 10 месяцев назад

There is already work to stick glide bombs with rocket boost motors on HIMARS. But this technology is also being worked on for air launched munitions. Basically using the rocket motor as a boost engine so an air craft carrying it can launch it much earlier (so extended the range of the glide bomb) that carriers the weapon to specific height and speed on its own before doing an unpowered glide for its terminal phase. Since it would just be a strap on boost motor, it wouldn't add to the complexity of the weapon. So you preserve the cheaper strap on kit nature of current glide bombs. But you could argue if it then is just missile kit rather than glide bomb kit.

@thinhvcoin 5 месяцев назад

After 5 moths, we can all came to the conclusion that the UMPK cope here didn't come true lol. The western media itself called it a game changer. This is why cope never works despite how professional it is presented

@Chuck_Hooks 10 месяцев назад

Gliding Russian tank turrets are all the rage.

@Gstyle1 10 месяцев назад

I prefer the glorious Leopard 2 space program 😂

@johannes.hoellwerth 10 месяцев назад

@@Gstyle1at least crew survives

@swell07_ 10 месяцев назад

so sick of this dumb jingoist american meme and i am an american veteran ffs stfu

@Chuck_Hooks 10 месяцев назад

@@Gstyle1 Russian tank crews get more flight time than Russian pilots do.

@tjb8104 10 месяцев назад

@@Gstyle1 imagine that actually made sense 😂 Russian crap is a 2 in 1 tank and crematorium

@ramonjr.deluna9584 10 месяцев назад

Marketing strategy by binkoff the frog.

@willisfernandes2366 6 месяцев назад

You forgot to include the MBDAs spear-3 missile. A suggestion from an indian.

@JamesCAlien 5 месяцев назад

A Missle has propellenant,don't it

@fortweek_7389 10 месяцев назад

10:05 There was a video that was geolocated and confirmed the range of more then 80km.

@kennethng8346 10 месяцев назад

WRT Glide bombs: does the lack of the engine help hide from thermal sensors? Or does air friction warm the surface enough to be detectable?

@chiron13 10 месяцев назад

9:47 Is that the Porn hub logo on a JDAM ?

@0El_Presidente0 10 месяцев назад

Looks like watermark

@hiddentruth1982 10 месяцев назад

I don't see missiles ever being replaced. Glide bombs are just a more accurate bomb at longer ranges. The missile though is a fast attack method for immediate threats. That will keep them in stock until laser weapons are on fighter jets. Basically all a glide bomb is is a way to save a little money on a guided rocket. Honestly a large chunk of the money for guided armaments isn't even in the armament but in the program used to guide it. You don't need to have the latest and greatest electronics for them and you will be wasting money if you did. So companies make money off the proprietary programming of the guidance system. That is why you can build a computer cheaper than having one custom made. Half the cost is in the right to use the windows program.

@Slavic_Goblin 10 месяцев назад

Even when lasers come, missiles and glide bombs will still be a thing.

@inteallsviktigt 10 месяцев назад

Well the NeXT step is wings on a missile

@hiddentruth1982 10 месяцев назад

@@inteallsviktigt pretty sure they already have those. just did a quick search and yeah they have those. Seems they have had those since the 60's except they are much bigger than a standard anti air missile.

@justacomment1657 10 месяцев назад

the warhead on a glide bomb is much bigger then that of a missile..

@ViceCoin 10 месяцев назад

GPS is jammed in Ukraine.

@JimCOsd55 10 месяцев назад

The more the Ukrainians rely on GPS, the more the Russians try to jam GPS-and the more the Ukrainians target the jammers. In the 21 months since Russia widened its war on Ukraine, Kyiv’s forces have destroyed at least four dozen Russian jamming systems, each of which might cost tens of millions of dollars.

@bombarderoazul 9 месяцев назад

Russia has their own gps called Glonass

@guillermoelenes7252 5 месяцев назад

GPS can be jammed with a hand held device.... do some research dude@@JimCOsd55

@petrsukenik9266 10 месяцев назад

How Russian glide bombs compare to NATO ones? As putin in family guy said "for anything you say i will say something similiar but worse"

@Donnnny2010 10 месяцев назад

Some lower end weapons are surprisingly effective and gaining intrest .having an engine would make it cruise longer and composite shspe more stealth. Clusters and airburst would compensate for any lacknof range and accuracy should it be big enough like the zFab 1500

@nemesis7774 10 месяцев назад

I wonder how the Hammer that the rafale carry would compare, considering it's a rocket assisted bomb..

@looinrims 10 месяцев назад

We love kabooms

@beepboop204 10 месяцев назад

as a Canadian we have to vicariously live through the kabooms of others

@vehx9316 10 месяцев назад

leave it to the Russians to make something on the fly that is crude, but works. Later iterations would smooth out the rough edges and simplfy it even futher.

@PeterMuskrat6968 10 месяцев назад

By further iterations you mean they will finally unlock the basic tech in the tech tree for “Industrial Manufacturing” The rest of the civilizations in the match already unlocked that one 150 years ago.

@victorzvyagintsev1325 10 месяцев назад

@@PeterMuskrat6968 What makes you think this is not mass-produced? You think the target cares how pretty the kit on the bomb is?

@auro1986 10 месяцев назад

one and same manufacturer distributes weapons of different shapes, sizes, colours, and features

@Ru_Imperialist 10 месяцев назад

как мы видим, авиабомбы США успешно справляются с уничтожением мирного населения при этом обладая стоимостью около 35-70 тысяч долларов. Это абсолютно разумная инвестиция, не то что умпк на фаб 500 с его стоимостью в 3 тысячи долларов

@23uhr 10 месяцев назад

@smuganimeface6247 10 месяцев назад

Don't make me get the Oryx list boy, "2nd best army" in the world is getting fucking demolished by nato's table scraps.

@Ru_Imperialist 10 месяцев назад

@@smuganimeface6247 не знал, что армия страны, что имеет ввп в 10 раз меньше чем сша способна поставить военно-промышленный комплекс всего запада в состояние истощения. Всего-то пара лет войны и запад уже не может производить артиллерийские снаряды в нужном количестве, а производство танков так и вовсе отсутсвует. Почему-то хоть по вашему мнению Россия несëт большие потери, Украина просит всë больше и больше техники, хотя по идее они уже должны быть в Крыму. Почему-то во многих СМИ Украины говорится об усилении мобилизации, а в СМИ России об этом почти не упоминается. По сути ради медийного уничтожения 2-й армии мира вы уничтожили целую страну поставив еë на грань демографической катастрофы. Медицина, образование, наука, промышленность этой страны была принесена в жертву ради того, чтобы по итогу ничего не добиться кроме как того, что Россия начала реформировать свою армию и демонстрировать всë новые образцы вооружения.

@youdontneedtoknowwhoiam9612 10 месяцев назад

@@smuganimeface6247 NATO ought to start lend leasing ukraine white paint given how much they wasted painting Z's on their own destroyed tanks.

@innelator6941 10 месяцев назад

@@smuganimeface6247interesting, why Oryx stopped counting NATO tanks losses? Oh yeah, independent journalists that double count only looses their owner said them to count. Calm down NAFO boi

@texaspapa9445 10 месяцев назад

Fantastic show!

@tkzsfen 10 месяцев назад

Would you make a video on the laser defenses recently used in Israel? I saw for the first time how beams take out rockets and it was mesmerizing!

@DanielNotWise 10 месяцев назад

Cause it fake and old vids from 2019. AA's smoke tails look like lazer bims in explosion's blinks

@peterparadis6788 10 месяцев назад

Have you ever seen a more Russian solution that the UMPK?

@trogdortpennypacker6160 10 месяцев назад

Quite surprised how quickly they corrected accuracy issues and boosted production numbers. Been following RUSI on this and watching videos of strikes, and they seem pretty accurate now. Ukraine military noted they get hit with about 50 of these a day so Russia probably still has to boost manufacturing abilities but man they look not very elegant. I won't give it much for style points that is for sure.

@johnfrost1814 10 месяцев назад

As a Russian speaker, I have to say that all pro-Russian community has shitted the UMPK at first, all the criticism that UMPK got was deserved. After some time, one of the engineers that worked for similar project in the 2010s released some parts of documents related to this, opening a new round of discussion about corruption, clientilism, negative-selection and so on. So in the end, all they got was the bomb that was not nearly as good as it should have been in the 2010s. I remember reading a ton of criticism regarding the wings, material used, bomb caliber, bomb holders, tactics regarding how to use the bomb, problems regarding Russian JTACs (ПАН- Передовой Авиа-Наводчик), and on and on. However, in the end we see a constant usage. A lot of people who are related with the army/topic were deeply unsatisfied however, they said that the UMPK was better than nothing. I know that the best course for me would be to provide sources, but I really can not recall which Telegram channels I got all the info. But I can still point out some of them where some amount of discussion was hold, fighter bomber and voenacher. These are pro-Russian channels and I would suggest anybody reading their content to take all of the info with a great amount of salt.

@tsugumorihoney2288 10 месяцев назад

@@johnfrost1814 yeah but UMPK just attached to bomb... it is not Bomb, it is only container which attached to bomb to make it gliding bomb

@johnfrost1814 10 месяцев назад

@@tsugumorihoney2288 yeah I know, it's a correction kit.

@al1sa920 5 месяцев назад

@@johnfrost1814 не сказал бы. Самое первое фото УМПК на бомбе с нарисованным лицом все на лостарморе, в т.ч. я, посчитали большим началом. И, как показало время, были правы

@nexpro6118 10 месяцев назад

Also, the faster the aircraft/fighter is going, the more range you can get out of the bomb/missile, since the launch speed is so high. It's why Russia is having their fighter pilots fly around 45k to 50k feet and traveling around Mach 1.8 when launching a bomb/missile since Russia is afraid to get anywhere near the battle area because Russia cannot afford to lose the little aircraft that is actually flyable and cannot afford to lose anymore of the somewhat trained pilots Russia does have. Russia has a lot of aircraft,but that doesn't also mean they are all flyable ha. There's a reason why Russia and even China don't release their readiness rates on their aircraft....

@davidshapiro292 10 месяцев назад

I saw the readiness rate if the F35 to be around 20-30%.

@nexpro6118 10 месяцев назад

@@davidshapiro292 it's up to, 52% right now. But yeah, the readiness rates for some US aircraft is low because the US has a massively high standards in maintaining aircraft

@_lo8241 10 месяцев назад

Even taking your lowest estimate of 20% that’s still over a hundred F-35s, how many 5th Gen fighters will they have to compete against? 10?

@davidshapiro292 10 месяцев назад

@@_lo8241 They are competing with S400

@user-xp5id1kh4r 10 месяцев назад

The S400 obviously isn't competing as advertised. Nor has any other piece of Russian air defense. Not that it matters though, because the 2 will almost certainly never meet up.@@davidshapiro292

@peterh8553 10 месяцев назад

This is something I was very curious about

@turnback9866 10 месяцев назад

Those r Soviet bombs , but russia put wings in them now to help them glide

@rowanyuh6326 3 месяца назад

My favorite is AASM Hammer

@aymonfoxc1442 10 месяцев назад

Glide bombs have a low resource cost, whilst missiles with seekers need minerals that are in short supply and subject to international trade sanctions.

@Jaxymann 10 месяцев назад

I understand that expediency outweighs aesthetics in times of war, but the Russian approach to glide munitions being a conversion kit made from spare metals in a workshop is a perfect illustration of the gulf in quality, resources and expertise between it and the United States. Some might say “beggars can’t be choosers”, but you would have thought one of the world’s supposed military superpowers would be capable of more effective approaches than crude improvisations.

@123456qwful 10 месяцев назад

This is more on the gov being cheap and unwilling to invest more then they want to in a weapon system, side it clear that the Russian have a large surplus of old soviet unguided bombs and due to war time measure and sanction it probably be easier to just due this way then having to source material from an already difficult and costly a microchip from a sanction market

@ex0duzz 10 месяцев назад

You are talking about economics, not technological ability. Russia obviously isn't an economic superpower like USA or China. If they had 10x the economy as well as manpower they too could "look good" and not rely on ad hoc methods. But everyone in war rely on ad hoc methods. That is war. You use what works. The alternative is dying or not being able to hit back. Time is of the essence.

@Slavic_Goblin 10 месяцев назад

If it's stupid and it works, it's not stupid.

@Slavic_Goblin 10 месяцев назад

@@ex0duzz I think it's more that they could set up a production line that would make nice sleek looking ones and get them in a relevant amount in a year, or set up a workshop and get them within a month. Considering early failure rates, troubleshooting was probably done on the battlefield.

@NorbMit 10 месяцев назад

stealth is not a thing against net-centric air defense like Russian for example. Re. Grom-2 usage - 128th ukranian brigade awarding ceremony has been bombed using Grom-2 recently, that's at least one known example. Re. UMKP - the video shows it's bias with comments like "cruder" and "possibly not tested". Propaganda piece.

@moldypotato4656 10 месяцев назад

The UMKP kit is visibly crude in terms of its construction and assembly. The time frame between its first appearance in 2023 and its first confirmed use also suggests its construction was rushed in order to quickly meet the needs of the battlefield in Ukraine. The JDAM and the JDAM-ER are both products of the late 90's and early 00's with many more years of R&D and well-established production lines with purpose-built facilities. Stating the UMKP may not be as well built or as thoroughly tested is not propaganda, it's simply an inference based on available information.

@NorbMit 10 месяцев назад

@@moldypotato4656 "crude" is subjective term, same as "sophisticated". the kit is clearly working very well, and to get it employed on the battlefield it gets thoroughly tested. To state otherwise is to show your bias and lack of knowledge of how things done in Russia.

@voidtempering8700 9 месяцев назад

@@NorbMitWe both clearly know how the words are being used here. And the point stands that they are crude and unsophisticated, them being used does change that fact.

@NorbMit 9 месяцев назад

as I stated above, "crude" and "unsophisticated" are subjective terms. @@voidtempering8700

@ImBigFloppa 9 месяцев назад

@@NorbMit Crude - constructed in a rudimentary or makeshift way. No paint, poor welds. Not aerodynamic. It's all made with hand tools. It couldn't get any more crude than that.

@franzxaverjosephconradgraf6850 10 месяцев назад

The copium of how this wonder weapon is going to defeat Russia is preety cute

@placeholder4819 10 месяцев назад

Лахтаны уже походу даже не смотрят название видоса под которым свой шаблоный текст вставляют

@sillysad3198 10 месяцев назад

@@placeholder4819 anaxuja?

@deven6518 10 месяцев назад

When it comes to air defenses, we've learned that whatever weapon you have you get one good shot then your planes and munitions are fair game. This applies to stealth aircraft and stealth missiles. Now as for the russian glide kit, despite being crude it its deadly accurate, like they dont miss. We have seen a more complete and finished kit, but those seem to be intended for newly produced fabs and not the older models in storage

@xtradi 10 месяцев назад

Cheap weapon is key in winning attrition war. The only other way to win is more effective weapons, but that's hard for near peer opponents

@MaxCroat 10 месяцев назад

@@xtradi The key in winning an attrition war is having a lot of those weapons. That is much more important than the price tag. The weapon being cheap is only important when it means you can produce a lot of it quickly. So, in the case of Russia and Ukraine, making cheap weapons could be very beneficial for Russia, but probably a lot less for Ukraine, since Ukraine doesn't really have the military industry to make large numbers of anything. Because of this they rely heavily on imported weapons, whereas Russia almost exclusively produces their weapons themselves, thus benefitting much more from having a cheap and/or simple weapon to manufacture.

@user-xp5id1kh4r 10 месяцев назад

"Deadly accurate" lololol, especially for "like they don't miss" lmaooo. I'm not saying the russian glide bombs are terrible like some people, but there's literally dozens of videos out there where they miss their obvious targets by hundreds of feet (which may be ok, depending on target/bomb). However, there's an even larger amount of videos where they hit very approximately their intended targets... so they're not completely terrible. BUT, to call them "deadly accurate, like they dont miss" is a ridiculous overstatement of their capability. If we're being honest, the russian glide bombs are "okay"... not great or even good, but certainly not terrible or bad.

@MaxCroat 10 месяцев назад

@@user-xp5id1kh4r Maybe those videos weren't of glide bombs, but of regular unguided bombs. Sure, these Russian glide bombs may not be as accurate as western ones, I don't know, but realistically in this day and age it is a pretty simple weapon to manufacture to be pretty accurate. Your phone's GPS is accurate to within a few meters. And when you have a 500kg bomb, you can afford to miss by quite a bit more than few meters.

@user-xp5id1kh4r 10 месяцев назад

No, they literally said glide bomb/kit in the titles, lol. But, I agree that its not "that" hard to manufacture a decent clip-on guidance kit for a dumb bomb... however, especially with how "rough"/ ghetto/ backyard/ garage/ redneck/ McGyvered the Russian glide bombs look (and how quickly they were designed/fielded): it is much more believable that the inter-unit RELIABILITY is HIGHLY VARIABLE, which would lead to the plethora of videos showing obvious misses while others showing fairly "pinpoint" accuracy.@@MaxCroat

@MCMilitaryForce 10 месяцев назад

Right now Israel is using JDAM precision bombs against Hamas to destroy buildings, it's very accurate

@Rssika 10 месяцев назад

Very accurate attacks on churches, hospitals and apartment complexes, those kids don't know what hit them. 🙄

@Gstyle1 10 месяцев назад

Nice joke, Hamas is sitting in their tunnels, hospitals and housing buildings are destroyed by Israel

@user-pm7fv9dt6j 10 месяцев назад

@@Rssika Hospital was clearly attacked by hamas, There's a dozen footage including AJ livestream showing the rocket misfire .

@MacTac141 10 месяцев назад

⁠@@Gstyle1Still trying to push that Hamas lie about the hospital? There’s multiple angles of footage showing the rocket launch failure by Hamas and the rocket hitting the hospital. Not the IDF They also claimed 500 people we killed when it went off in a parking lot. Since that was obviously bs makes you wonder how inflated the total Palestinians killed number actually is. If they blatantly lied here they likely are on other incidents

@ou6775 10 месяцев назад

And hospitals.

@mhick3333 10 месяцев назад

Great presentation

@boikanyoonneng9170 10 месяцев назад

I unfollowed this page for my own sanity.. This guy largely assumes things and tells us his opinion not facts.. Notice how he says Russian glide bombs are not advanced compared to US ones but doesnt explain how he reached that conclusion? He has never been near either.. Take the contents of this video with extreme caution

@petpara 10 месяцев назад

the Chanel is political and taking side's is always wrong...so don't expect hearing some realty here...

@djambox1439 10 месяцев назад

If he has to explain to you something that obvious i guess this channel isnt for someone like u.

@boikanyoonneng9170 10 месяцев назад

@@djambox1439 If you live on assumptions I guess this channel is for you.. What you just said sounds so stupid and is not professional nor is it factual..

@agharuokansirim4935 10 месяцев назад

I was going to do the same but he's not as bad as the others. He sits on the fence too much. He's afraid of stating the facts for fear of losing subscribers.

@serheyyavotsky1246 10 месяцев назад

True. Alas the guy is too biased. Animation in the video is cool tho

@PetrOsetr 8 месяцев назад

Look... Not even getting into this discussion but UMPK system was designed just "now" and it was initially made out of "shit and logs" how do we say in Russian. It is too early to compare as the system undergo active development. Also they are dirt cheap and RF has a huge pile of Soviet bombs to upgrade. So finally of course NATO gliding bombs are better "right now", what will happen 1-2 years later - might be another story.

@TorianTammas 2 дня назад

They shoot down the planes carrying the bombs and blow them up on the ground. Airforce downgrading does not work so easily as with BMP and tanks that become more and more Soviet Union legacy weapons.

@london_james 10 месяцев назад

Imagine these in WWII

@jarink1 10 месяцев назад

No need to imagine it, they existed on both sides.

@london_james 10 месяцев назад

@@jarink1 oh cool. I'll do some reading

@ToastyMozart 10 месяцев назад

They were around, albeit without (decent) guidance systems.

@Ken_Koonz 10 месяцев назад

The glide bomb knows where it is becuae it knows where it isn't.

@Zlorthishen 10 месяцев назад

i bought your plushy, my cats are sure to ignore it

@PeterMuskrat6968 10 месяцев назад

It uses GLONASS, which is about half as accurate as GPS. Russia could not afford to fully launch and deploy all the satellites necessary to increase the accuracy of the system.

@aymonfoxc1442 10 месяцев назад

Many Russian and Iranian weapons use GPS... which is ironic.

@stevebuckley7788 10 месяцев назад

Seriously no. GLONASS uses a much better algorithm and can be assisted by ground based stations. The technology in GPS was designed in the 1970s so of course the GLONASS (and EU Galileo) navigation system is superior.

@klardfarkus3891 4 месяца назад

Like many channels, this was a good channel before it got a grant from an NGO to,produce propaganda content.

@Nealetony 10 месяцев назад

Do stormbreaks mingle with stormshadows?

@someguydino6770 10 месяцев назад

RE: The Israeli SPICE 250 bomb shown at 17:25 Q= Is that bar shaped assembly above the 4 bombs; just a carrier- loader structure; or does it have other functions?

@dmaggio4011 10 месяцев назад

Pretty well done….

@mhick3333 10 месяцев назад

The hound dog might be an interesting section

@Svip_dk 10 месяцев назад

Marrick was TV guided

@PsyTechnical 10 месяцев назад

Maverick has laser, TV, and IR guided variants.

@GlitchGameryoutube 10 месяцев назад

Hey look it’s….

@tommasofrogli8065 10 месяцев назад

Nafo bots incoming

@iamscoutstfu 10 месяцев назад

Nafo

@cameronspence4977 10 месяцев назад

Cope

@user-xp5id1kh4r 10 месяцев назад

Its funny, cause this video's comment section is flooded with pro-ru bots instead. There's almost no nafo bots, who've seemed to have greatly disappeared over the last half year to year or so. They must have gotten bored and went back to school

@nicolasolton 10 месяцев назад

Where?

@ktm8848 5 месяцев назад

i don't get it why you keep emphasizing on the crudness or backwardness of russian design !!! while those UMPK represent a small fraction of the US gucci kits while just perfoming on same level they both have -5 meters CEP ..this channel just became just like any other western pro-ukraine shit spreading outlet

@TorianTammas 2 дня назад

can you explain to us why a channel has to show your opinion?

@user-si8mr1zi4s 10 месяцев назад

Bro balkan union vs turkey war scenario for Istanbul and cyprus

@demiller74 10 месяцев назад

Wow SDB… just wow!

@svinche2 10 месяцев назад

The only problem with GBU-39SDB is that in order to reach some decent range, producer sacrifice its payload, so destructive power is very very low, (there are 3 type of warheads available : 93kg (with 16kg of explosive), 62kg and 16kg for Laser SDB (GBU-39B/B) ) Now compare that with FAB-1500M46 UMPK,which is a 1500Kg Bomb with warhead weighting 1120kg and filled with almost of 700kg of explosive !!!

@dominuslogik484 10 месяцев назад

@@svinche2 the JDAM-ER has similar range to the GBU-39SDB but it is for much larger bombs such as the 2,000 pound bomb and has proven exceptionally accurate as well.

@jonathanpfeffer3716 10 месяцев назад

@@svinche2it’s also way way smaller and lighter than the FAB.

@svinche2 10 месяцев назад

@@dominuslogik484 JDAM-ER have many variants, but for 2000 pound GBU‐31 JDAM (based on Mark 84 bomb) the range is very modest compared with lighter variants, of just 15+ miles or 24 km.

@dominuslogik484 10 месяцев назад

@@svinche2 everywhere I am seeing shows a range of 45 miles so please tell me where you are getting the 15 mile range estimate from.

@GlenCychosz 10 месяцев назад

Air launched Spike NLOS.

@benabka 4 месяца назад

I'm so disappointed with this channel. Why is it impossible to have fair and objective assessments?

@MauiWowie51 10 месяцев назад

Bring back Fritz X

@jamisonmaguire4398 10 месяцев назад

"Only real peace can bring us all together" should be replaced with "real peace can only be achieved with a strong military".

@tanberetO 3 месяца назад

The Russian bots are so mad 😂😂

@pierrecao4758 3 месяца назад

why would russian bots be mad? this is a pretty neutral video and russia's stragegy has always been quantity over quality.

@tanberetO 3 месяца назад

@@pierrecao4758 Read the comments

@pierrecao4758 3 месяца назад

@@tanberetO which one? most comments are pretty valid and few might be a bit strange but that's expected on youtube. Nothing really out of the ordinary.

@tanberetO 3 месяца назад

@@pierrecao4758 I'm supposed to name them special child? You can't differentiate fantasy from reality?

@pierrecao4758 3 месяца назад

@@tanberetO the problem is.. i don't think you can.

@danpatterson8009 10 месяцев назад

As guidance technology progresses these sensor packages might show up in expendable "bird dog" drones that leverage position information by passing it to some number of "follow the leader" munitions. Your hobby drone might be able to drop grenades on a tank, but what if you could direct a large bomb or artillery shell to "go where the drone is"? Maybe that's already happening...

@jonathanpfeffer3716 10 месяцев назад

Is already happening, sensor fused drones employing loitering munitions is basically what you describe. There are some cool videos on drone swarms that might interest you, they’re surprisingly old.

@super1or1ty 9 месяцев назад

120/month umpk

@Blueblue7 10 месяцев назад

Binkov, can you do a video on Light fighter jets like the F5 or HAL Tejas? I’m curious to hear your take on the utility of them on the modern battlefield

@RusselTanTing-kf8zm 5 месяцев назад

You only mention a little bit about Russian glide bombs, but then you emphasize more on US glide bombs for the rest of the video. You almost scammed us.

@christopherchartier3017 9 дней назад

Almost like there’s more to US bombs than Russian ones

@Troy_Tempest 10 месяцев назад

Invented by Germany!

@nikunjkhanna4260 10 месяцев назад

Indian SAAW is also one

@scene2much 10 месяцев назад

How far from their recognizable targets are spent UMPK glide bombs found? That should be perfect evidence of how accurate they are. Of course, that means one should establish a broad perimeter and sample all UMPK spent within that perimeter and evaluate the distance from them to military targets in their vicinity. That should get a PhD for somebody at war college.

@dexterroy 5 месяцев назад

Propaganda channel. Blocking this one.

@TheGrindcorps 3 месяца назад

He used to be good too. So many channels went to shit after start of special military operation and just turned into anti-China anti-Russia propaganda. I wonder how much they get paid? The Ukrainians sure are having trouble stopping these glide shovels.

@K-Man-k5n 3 месяца назад

Most people see what the Russians and Chinese do, and for themselves decide what they will cover. You dont like it because you have your own bias.

@KillerofWestoids 10 месяцев назад

Russian and NATO bots will now wage their eternal war in the comment section 😂😂

@archieherrington9955 10 месяцев назад

There's no debate to be made Russia is struggling against ukraine with barely any nato tech 30 well trained and well armed countries against Russia would be a slaughter

@indianastan 10 месяцев назад

I fail to see what is so funny?

@iancoles1349 10 месяцев назад

Well plain to see Russian capabilities.

@shuathe2nd 10 месяцев назад

and lack of

@scottt5521 10 месяцев назад

I'm guessing that most of your viewers are in the US and UK. Thanks for using the good old "miles" for distance measurement.

@theidioticgentleman4646 10 месяцев назад

UK use metric now you goose

@benoithudson7235 10 месяцев назад

Aviation is also weird with units, lots of nautical miles and statute miles.

@justacomment1657 10 месяцев назад

what miles are we talking about? land or sea miles?

@TRADERJEJ 10 месяцев назад

Circa 1990 I was dating a woman who programmed / coded the flight path for the then new U.S. cruise missiles.

@nerdomania24 10 месяцев назад

fake

@DeWellstein 10 месяцев назад

are you a nigerian prince?

@sillysad3198 10 месяцев назад

nice one, fed!

@Bebbsy40 10 месяцев назад

Hello!

@billballbuster7186 10 месяцев назад

Glide Bombs been around since WW1, radio controlled GBs in WW2. The Americans were fielding very sophisticated GBs, Walleye and Maverick during the Vietnam War. The Russians and Chinese were late to the party and the Russian GB have not been accurate.