How does one negate the 'I' without suppression | J. Krishnamurti 

He simplifies it so much. And made us understand what he meant “l don’t demand anything from anyone , I don’t demand anything from this world I don’t care what happens . Krishnamurti made me understand suffering and understanding suffering lights a fire in u and thorough your own inquiry realize u have the key everyone has the key It’s in everyone

Thank God we had so good questioning minds when JK was available & alive, These people who asks questions in every Videos have utilised JK teachings completely or partially.... In this session i would give more credits to questions rather then answer because always, an intelligent answer depends on intelligent question.

This is one which needs revisiting at intervals. Awareness seems to slip away in the face of daily life. Thank you.

Thank u krishnamurti official channel....keep posting these type of videos where K discusses about the fact observer is the observed....To understand his whole teachings we must understand the fact or the implications of the sentence(observer is the observed)....I think only in very few videos he does go very deep into this sentence; especially whenever he talks about the trees........... I am glad that there are still few people in the world who have subscribed to this channel and continuously struggling to understand or to experiment themselves what k is talking about ......I am deeply grateful to this channel for continuously posting new K's videos....

"The symbol has taken the place of reality"

"♥️it is the clarity of observation which is the greatest form of intelligence "JK♥️♥️♥️♥️

This viewer found this to be a very clear, deep exploration of pure observation. Very helpful.

Conflict ends when the observer is not and only observation is :)

Clarity of observation without bringing who is observed in between is absolute intelligence.

30:56 real stuff starts from here...

Thank uuu chhanal for presenting modern day Buddha...

This is a frequent question put to Krishnaji throughout his life and afterwards. Its an age old and one might say a backdoor question implying "what am i to do?" Tell me how to 'conquer' the land of the infinite? "Tell me how to be a hero by negating my self!" Sadly most of us are caught up in that mindset and the poor chap spent 90 years pointing it out. Lots of respect to this beautiful expression of infinity.

I love the woodpecker. Great timing. Now he’s immortal :)

It is the clarity of observation which is the greatest form of intelligence. When there is mere observation without the observer, that observation dispels all that is observed. This is supreme intelligence. Outstanding video.

Excellent! Thoroughly enjoying these insights. Thank you for making them available. Have a great day.

Observe the world without an observer. An observer is I, Me, Mine, My egoistic approach towards life.Self-centered activities.

The Clarity of observation is the greatest form of Intelligence.. 👌 J.k.

K is the treasure of my life, changed everything.

To observe without observer ❤

Absolute clear mind, no seeking experiences, no waste of energy that state brings all energy into the being. 부처님의 12연기중 행을 소멸함으로 모든것이 소멸한다.

Oh man he is genius. Such a wonderful explanation. Thanks for uploading this video

Ďakujem za všetko, čo som sa naučila, za zmenu, ktorou som prešla. 🙏 Nádherné ❤️ Veľmi by som si priala, keby boli preložené všetky videá do Slovenského jazyka.🦋

Espectacular explicación del Maestro Krisnhamurti. Gracias Maestro en el Silencio.

I got to know he had throat cancer and the way he delivered those lectures it gives me goosebumps whenever i see Jiddu ji speaking with so much energy and strength it used to hurt him a lot when he used to speak still this man spoke till his last breath ❤

Clarity in observation is the greatest form of intelligence.When the heart is pure and mind is clear then TRUTH is near. We ego is zero one becomes a real hero.

Beautiful. Thank you.

he is a very lovely person! make me laugh few times.. make me peaceful. beautiful, wise being

One of the best K dialogues I've seen.

A real human being without any conditioning

Wow! Someone never Articulated like this ever before to me! Which consiously obliterates whom I am! This might bring in an end to life of Word! Sum up! Truth in 38min and 50sec True wisdom!

Clarity of observation

Krishnamurti makes you find your inner spirituality and awareness beyond religion

make peace with your past. live in the moment totally

It doesn't matter if you will observe with or without labeling the world around you because there still will be an 'I' that decides what to choose of both. Indeed it is an amazing feeling to experience life with a clear mind, but the 'I' (or whatever you wanna call it) will always be there even in the absence of words. You're simply a living organism that is aware of its existence and that shouldn't be a problem. I mean, yes, we encounter pain, tragedies and etc throughout our lives, but in my opinion if there is a "fix" (the universe didn't promise us nothing) to this it is that we be honest and accept this part of existence just as we accept the other (happiness, joy and etc). There isn't much that we can do.

21:01 when he said " oh u are repeating the same old thing ,, that is a movement of thought tho,,

The accumulation of knowledge is book knowledge, which is based in time, the past, and all its conditioning of its fears of yesterday or the future . One acts now in the present moment, of the truth or the question of the proposition of what is being questioned with clarity, then one understands freedom to love with compassion. 🙏❤️🌍🌿🕊🎵🎶🎵

Thank you very much

Wonderful

Once something, a state for example, "feels like something", you are back in thought. It is a form of liking, disliking or indifference - all ways of reification. What you thought you were looking for, is the simple, "dull", subtle, everyday, inconclusive state of just the lights being on, nothing more It deepens in various ways if you trust it

Thank you!

@2:35 JK answered all the questions ever asked to him. "I dont know what negative thinking is, really. Thinking is in itself is negative."

Thank you very much.

'I will save me from myself' thinking

he is like one in a billion on this planet...what a lonely life must he lived

I needed this in my life. I stumbled across the book Total Freedom at a Thrift store, it looked interesting but I didn't start reading it for about 2 years. Now that I've explored his wisdom, confusion is melting away. It's lovely actually.

There is only observation. Thank You.

Astounding Awareness 🔆#Namaste Even more assureing, 2nd. time !!! 👀 #CLARITY 💫 🐬 💫

Thinker is the thought. Observer is the observed. Experiencer is the Experienced..🤔🤔

How interesting this is, but to negate the “I” or the “Me” is hard. It lurks deep within us, hidden deeply. 😢

Thank you

I become aware of the 'I' during meditation but then I return to the normal world.

there is no conflict in the self, or denial of the self or suppression of the self. It is the clarity of observation, which is the greatest form of intelligence.

Rapt attention is required to grasp. Fantastic sir

Just look at the thought . The moment you look there is no thought. Ie the essence of k's teachings

Super talk ! Peace of mind !

How can one "negate" a Fata Morgana, which is the 'I'. By realizing, that it is not more or less than a FATA MORGANA! The Phenomenon will not disappear, but you realize what it is. 😳

Simple to listen.

❤❤

🙏

I have found Krishnamurti's talks help affirm to my thoughts. Which is I guess one of the points made lol. Wish I had found these sooner.

❤

I, the subjective sensation as the viewer/thinker, is an effect of incomplete brain activity. This subjectiveness is essential to safeguard the physical organism in the physical environment but, because of the evolution of language, brain is trapped into safeguarding the sensations of that which has happened or might happen to the physical organism in psychological space-time in the activity called thinking.

20:22 is there a difference between the observer and the observed? If there is an observer then yes there is! Only when there isn't any observer, the difference is not! Only when the observer has no memory and has no opinion about what is seen, only when there is impersonal observation, there is no observer!!! A digital camera is an observer? no it is not, the observer is the one that makes the photos, the one that looks at the photos!! A digital camera has no opinion about the the photos that you are taking... well that's how we have to be!! Impartial like a digital camera!!! To look at everything without the word, or the knowledge as he says, it is of a tremendous importance! Because when you are the knowledge that looks, then you react, but when you look without knowledge how can you react? You react to what if you know nothing?? When you know nothing, not even that you exist, and tat you are, then there is impartial observation! But don't forget that knowledge is very important, so we can't just forget everything and live like cows!!! knowledge is needed... but we look at knowledge with knowledge (of the knowledge) also!!! So the question is can there be impartial observation of knowledge also?? YES is the answer! There can be observation of knowledge without translating it! In the same way in which there can be observation of a tree without translating it!!! From this view point trees, and knowledge have something in common!! Both can be observed impartially! Our reactions are knowledge!!! Our reactions come from the past!! So what if we could observe all of our reactions in the exact moment in which these reactions are happening? To observe them without the past, which means without reacting to them! If we observe reactions without reacting to them, then there is observation without knowledge, then there is impartial observation of your knowledge at work! Who is observing? NO ONE!!! Because something that has no reactions does not exist! Something that has no reaction has no past, has no opinion yet, has no experience yet, has no preferences yet! To observe all our reactions without recognising them, without translating them, is the key! And this is possible only NOW while these reactions are actually happening, not after they are happened.

Isness in the flesh. What a special being. Wish he’d still be here. I wish I could see life through his eyes. But he’d probably say something that’d make me feel like I don’t get it.

Thought carrying knowledge of the source of emotion holds back its energy and outburst. This creates emotional blockages and deposits, which are the source of all conflict. There is no observation without an observer. What annihilates the observer is pure experience

He attributes all conflict to the ego, but he doesn´t admit that on human structure there is something which is the "essence" which observes everything without judge, and this essence survives after death. For him, nothing survives after death. He doens´t admit we are individuals.

He said thinking itself is negative . But I don’t feel that way . I think be unconscious about your thinking is negative . Unless you are aware of your thinking is not bad . We can’t denied or reject it , I but observe it

💙🙏

the more ur brain is fragmented the more there is conflicts which makes a I the more oneness u have in your brain which brings order in that order I doesn't operate

It seems the responsibility of love is the highest motive to have in seeking to transcend the ego because of how it doesn't concern itself with selfish reason

Think the pure Buddhist answer would be mindfulness of mindfulness on to pure observation..

Doesn't this connect directly with Heidegger's "Dasein"? I believe it does.

We understand everything of what k has said only verbally. But when u understand actually then what takes place.

Thinking in itself is negative, has he ever expounded on that statement in any video or book?

So we invented words and symbols to escape observing unlimited.

This gets really confusing?? 😕

But observer is there all the time! Is it even possible to get rid of it without erasing memories??

Can you add English subtitles

We can understand total awareness but to be in that is difficult because thought is tricky and it dominates awareness and we are lost in it. Again thinking process starts then what will you do.

At one point, He says, "Are you doing it?" That is, looking without the word. "That there is no point, if you are not applying it." I think what normally happens here, is that a person tries to do this either through trying to suppress the process of immediate identification of something with the word we learned for that thing or we imagine what we think K means by this or we imagine that we are doing it and say yes, I am looking at the thing without the word, as far as I can tell or we say, no, I seem to keep looking at things with the associated word. Or, the last possibility, the thing is being observed without the word. Then the last question, but by whom or what is doing the observing? To say that there is just observation is a bit confusing. Because to notice that there is observation taking place without the observer creates an endless loop of what is it that is observing. Otherwise you wouldn't ask or notice. Even the issue of ego-center is a bit confusing, the term seems to imply that there is the ego and there is the center of that ego, thus the term ego-center. So is he saying that it is just the center of the ego which is the problem but not the ego as a whole if it had no center?

can you determine, what is pure observation without interrupted by memories, and what is not? when it's get subtler, how to fully aware every time.. that i'm not playing with past data i've been accumulate? like he said, apply to daily life is important, and it's the hardest part.

he said i dont quote , that uncovering the real nature true self has not worked. But he keeps pointing to it? i don't think he actually answered the initial question fully. perhaps the video was cut before the end of his talk?

34:54

I always find....I. Always, words, meaning in whatever form, hang from notions of understanding... It's all so much imagery, movement and...me. Frustrating. I can't let go. Intellectualy I 'get' it would be me letting go, and that any process involving me just preserves me. And so, I 'should' let that process go. Still me though, isn't it? And so the merry-go-round spins. So silly🙃

What the hell is positive thinking. "Thinking by itself is negative" -- JK 🙂

Who is the one who is recording the experience?

What is Atma or Atman? What is self? What is negation? Content of consciousness and Universal one consciousness? Not talk about ... but find yourself ?

ooooooooo!!!!

"Clarity of observation is the highest form of intelligence" JK I assume the real juice and the rejuvenation of life lives in the plain of pure observation.I want to be there.

When you look at ur husband drinking alcohol then what is the observation there ?so the husband is not according to my preset image . So I get angry. How to observe that

29:00 arahan

☯️🌌👣

Unfortunately, truly listening and inquiring into the matter of the "I", valuable as it is, is still not enough to contend with all kinds of fierce unconscious forces (which may be considered irrational or pre-rational). The rational approach of inquiry (even though it's not intellectual, as Krishnamurti would have it), is simply not powerful enough to dissolve what we're not even aware of. We're not primarily rational. We often use arguments, spin theories, which just justify (or rationalize) those unconscious tendencies. So to use a rational approach to attempt to dissolve what is fiercely irrational is frankly silly - because rationality remains only a surface feature of consciousness. Or a useful analogy: It's like a puppet that thinks he can put an end to the puppeteer! There's nothing in Krishnamurti's talks to suggest that those unconscious forces have been confronted.

Either I fail to understand or the speaker is not very direct in answering. The observed and the observer is not different. So there is no observer. As far as I can understand this is the negation of observer. And when negation exists, the question comes back.

Does this mean we should be like Adam & Eve before they discovered the knowledge tree?

he doesnt really answer the question does he?

🇺🇳27:12

32 : 33 he was also one of billions that were deceived to believe a man went physically to the moon ?

.

he said there is no guru..but what is he?? he