How entangled black holes create Einstein-Rosen bridges | ER=EPR | Leonard Susskind 

SOUMYA ADHIKARI calm down

@@jeevans1194 😁

WHY ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS UNIFIED AND BALANCED WITH/AS WHAT IS GRAVITY: Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are LINKED AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, Einstein's equations and Maxwell's equations are unified (given the addition of a fourth spatial dimension); AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma; AS TIME DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ACCORDINGLY, Einstein's equations predict that SPACE is expanding OR contracting in and with TIME; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. THE SUN purely exemplifies time DILATION. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Let's compare this directly with BOTH a falling object AND the speed of light (c). Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. Ultimately and truly, TIME is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The ultimate unification of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND includes opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. It ALL makes perfect sense. THINK !!! The Earth that undergoes time DILATION IS thus represented (ON BALANCE) as what is A POINT in the night sky, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (So, notice that the BLUE SKY IS no longer visible. Think.) E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is FULLY proven. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Alas, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. I have truly, CLEARLY, AND MATHEMATICALLY unified physics/physical experience. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. (Notice the black space of THE EYE, AND the DOME of a person's eye is ALSO visible.) THE EARTH is ALSO blue. Again, E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Time dilation proves that E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma, AS electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. By Frank DiMeglio

Susskind doesn't really understand physics.

@@frankdimeglio8216 Capitalizing random words doesn't make you smarter

Depends if it’s stable then yes, if not then no and you would require some exotic matter to stablize it

Negative energy requirements equate to exotic matter to host the bridge open from the inside -e=-mc^2

@@4inaftermath454 I think I understood that! Thanks!

Didn’t tiles take the problem on too.

it's the ER = EPR that he is talking about

You would not be able to escape the other end

A bridge. Does it have a sombrero on both sides. Hats up and up or down and down. Spinning in unisons. My. What a problem

@Dragon FN I was pretty sure that the consensus was that spacetime is either flat or ever so gently curved. When you said that space is spherical did you that gravitic effects result in spherical objects in a vacuum?

Why does 1 and 2 entangle

5:41 - 7:03

Watch the video

@Sasquatch94 nice

Uh... It shouldn't...

Unless the spirit is whisky

@@alexanderkunovszky7333 that or a longer way to get there but you would probably collapse it just by going through it unless you could stabilize it

I’m doing good to entangle1 and 2. Lol

ER = EPR can be read as an algebraic notation, ( E times R equals E times P times R ) So P must be 1 in that expression. 🤓

U sus for dat one

📸 yup this one's going in the cringe collection

I would have corrected your spelling on "reeking" to "wreaking" but he's just farted his way through a court appearance 👃🤮

Looking at my question, I obviously haven't got a clue about physics or geometry, but I'd appreciate it if you could talk me through this like it's on kids TV 🙏

How did you come to this conclusion? About a year ago I got to the same conclusion because of the similarities between electric and gravitational fields. Their intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source.

How is E = mc^2 derived from F = ma? Care to show the mathematics?

@@thattwodimensionalant4626 No he won't simply because he's one of those ubiquitous, shenaniganal cranks who falsely claim they know everything. Just ignore these people.

@@badmintongo4832 That’s true. It’s a real shame that people who don’t even go through the education can make such claims. They don’t have the knowledge or skills needed to do anything other than talk, it’s the same with all of them.

@@thinnspeaker6123 welcome in 3 spatial dimensions brother

Tumhala kase mahiti

@@Mr_ST_720 mazya vicharane hi gosht khup logical aahe ani scinence chya drishti konane mala barobar vaatte

you dont have to mate , but some of us would like a better explanation than the one offered up by the Arab goat herders ! One that adults have bothered to spend time and resources on , after all without the scientific revolution we wouldnt be communicating , going to hospitals for treatment , exploring the local universe , its the Homosapiens who are curious that seem to have improved the total knowledge of humanity .

@@ianmarshall9144Advancements just a little numbers game. the scientists who say they want to do all this shit don’t actually give a fuck about advancement. Its the personal perks that they get along with it. Its pretty laughable when you try to tell a buch of muppets who dont know the difference between XX and XY chromosomes to get on a ship and fly to mars.

To every end n accomplishments how much distant it has always has a unmanifestable start. This very lecture is the early start for year of 2300 of first accomplishments.. if you do not understand the need of theoretical physics you are not suppose to be in this place.

@@Mr_ST_720Dont appreciate the ad hominem mindset. I said it’s pointless learning about this shit because youl be dead before the real benefits from theoretical physics become a reality. To even study black holes your looking close to 1500+ years with light speed traversal. Not to mention the majority of the human population dont give a shit about interplanetary exploration. Those who do, don’t actually care about the future but only about the pay check they are going to get. Even if wormholes existed whats there to explore? Some plannet that has 1000m/s winds? Theres nothing out there cunt that anyones bothered to explore unless it comes with a massive paycheck