Тёмный

How ExxonMobil Is Planning For A Future Of EVs 

CNBC
Подписаться 3,6 млн
Просмотров 137 тыс.
50% 1

In this interview conducted for CNBC’s documentary, ExxonMobil at the Crossroads, CEO Darren Woods reveals why his company predicted that by 2040 all new passenger car sales would be electric. He also talks about the low carbon solutions ExxonMobil is investing in, climate change, governmental policy, oil demand and more in this extended interview with CNBC’s David Faber.
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/Subscri...
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/Subscri...
About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedI...
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/Instagr...
#cnbc
How ExxonMobil Is Planning For A Future Of EVs

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 646   
@Knoar
@Knoar 2 года назад
What a long advertisement
@jefferyjeffery1707
@jefferyjeffery1707 2 года назад
Yep....!! He completely left out. That governments are also phasing heavy duty transportation fuels out also. And that as solar and wind energy develop. It will also convert water back to Hydrogen!! And that does not need oil at all!! In addition....40% of the corn crop is grown for the energy business... just to be used to make alcohol. Which is then blended with gasoline, to make gasohol!!! And as gasoline engines disappear...40% of the corn crop is not needed!!! And as such....farming is downsized. In which, farming practices itself, also accounts for almost 40% of the world's global warming games. I have a large farm...And am already planning to move away from growing corn. And I also used to work at the corporate level for ExxonMobil...!!!
@T4KKFI
@T4KKFI 2 года назад
I swear i didn't hear MSNBC ask this CEO if he believe in a gloabal climate sustainability. Im just ready for the day everyone has to suffer. I feel the weather GA nowadays and you won't catch me having a heat stroke from wasting energy and talking. I'm a bee as realistic as possible i have umbrellas in this weather seriously. The weather is A1 though I'm not talking out there caught in that sun and it's official black people can get skin burned smfh
@Thelango99
@Thelango99 2 года назад
@@T4KKFI This is CNBC, not MSNBC. I am inclined to believe Darren would be a part of driving a cost-effective way for arriving at sustainable solutions.
@jefferyjeffery1707
@jefferyjeffery1707 2 года назад
@@T4KKFI Yep....👍 Even in the midwest.....its becoming to hot to grow corn. As corn likes mid-80's temp. But pushing into the 90's is not good.
@Tython_
@Tython_ 2 года назад
😂😂😂😂
@joejoey7272
@joejoey7272 2 года назад
So basically this is a large advertisement for Exxon’s greenwashing campaign
@james3440
@james3440 2 года назад
Your comment without proof is frankly just as bad.
@TheFlagUnit
@TheFlagUnit 2 года назад
@@james3440 no they actively knew and denied climate change via fossil fuels
@sooocheesy
@sooocheesy 2 года назад
The (literal) blue collar shirt on this guy tells you right away that this interview was highly curated by their marketing department.
@TexasRiverRat31254
@TexasRiverRat31254 2 года назад
My thoughts exactly! Whole thing is promo for BS.
@paulosgood6876
@paulosgood6876 2 года назад
I kinda got that vibe.
@ryanandnatalie1806
@ryanandnatalie1806 2 года назад
Cynical
@Ryanlexz
@Ryanlexz 2 года назад
Just like zelensky propaganda
@23StudiosSports
@23StudiosSports Год назад
Pretty sure it’s just a field shirt because he probably just walked the refinery….
@RushingRussianify
@RushingRussianify 2 года назад
Nice ad CNBC, put a disclosure banner at the bottom next time
@robitmcclain6107
@robitmcclain6107 2 года назад
Is it deliberate that he left nuclear and geothermal off his list of technologies?
@beautifulgirl219
@beautifulgirl219 2 года назад
Yes, because they provide real solutions today. Nuclear alone can solve the global energy need, and should be the largest solution. It takes responsibility for all the "waste" it produces.
@eric5901
@eric5901 2 года назад
Why is Buffet buying oil???? Occidental petroleum and Chevron to be specific
@MrBadbonesaw
@MrBadbonesaw 2 года назад
@@beautifulgirl219 It takes over 10 years to get new Nuclear plants built due to all the extra precautions. Meanwhile, China gets 10 built every year. We might as well buy energy off China as well LOL
@beautifulgirl219
@beautifulgirl219 2 года назад
@@MrBadbonesaw The time issue doesn't change nuclear being our best option, in my opinion. I suspect that with enough motivation we could shorten the time. Small modular reactors and other approaches could help. Where there is a will, there is a way (?).
@MrBadbonesaw
@MrBadbonesaw 2 года назад
@@beautifulgirl219 I am all for nuclear but waiting 10 years like the one in France and costing Billions of dollars hurts the payback period. Without Government assistance, it would probably take an additional 20 years for each nuclear reactor to break even. I do think we should have enough nuclear to run everything we need overnight and then during the day nuclear + solar and Wind could be recharging long-term energy storage like redux flow batteries or electrolysis to produce hydrogen and clean water desalination plants. A nuclear power plant should never have to throttle down less than 75% full power at any time besides maintenance periods. Phase-out coal and phase-out natural gas peaker plants asap.
@Tucanaldeinversiones
@Tucanaldeinversiones 2 года назад
This company will shrink like 30% in the next 10 years
@Josh-sx7wn
@Josh-sx7wn 2 года назад
I think they know something we don’t… like that we are running out of oil
@RandomUserOnTheInterWebs
@RandomUserOnTheInterWebs 2 года назад
Who exactly doesn't know this?
@romeou4965
@romeou4965 2 года назад
Smart and fast move by Elon musk
@Boxagami
@Boxagami 2 года назад
No, that's a total lie they keep telling about running out. Oil fields that ran dry, many filled back up! The rockafellar criminal family coined the term "fossil fuels" to raise the cost. Oil is abiotic and they keep lying about it.
@Josh-sx7wn
@Josh-sx7wn 2 года назад
@@RandomUserOnTheInterWebs people with they head in the sand 🤷🏻‍♂️
@dgupta42
@dgupta42 2 года назад
So much fake news in this interview. If you look at the world's total crude and gas production of roughly 100 mboe per year, there is no way the world needs all of that to become plastics in the future. Unless the company is also working on modifying or replacing humans to be made out of plastic, and eat and drink plastic. There is a fundamental reason sane people are skeptical about carbon capture ever scaling up. Why even bother producing and burning petroleum, and then spend even more capital and operating cost to capture emissions? How can that be cheaper than renewable energy that is already cheaper than just the cost of producing expensive oil & gas in the first place? Yes, we need oil & gas during the transition because it will take time to switch. We cannot just shut off the wells today. But the economic logic of the switch will move oil & gas consuming sectors away quickly. Which is why oil & gas is lobbying to stop governments and cities to act on moving away from usage like gas for heating buildings. They know they will not win the case on fair competition basis. We do NOT need to invest in replacing the full capacity of our old fossil fuel energy system. The man is smart enough to know that, but he cannot say it because then his company's future looks like badly burnt toast. Of no value to society or shareholders. Everyone knows the largest use for petroleum is transportation fuels. But, battery to wheels has higher than 85% efficiency already, compared to hardly 25-27% for tank to wheels in a gasoline car. Electricity is easily 3x more efficient in the largest oil & gas consumption market! Another large use for oil & gas is building heat. Electric heat pumps can transfer 3-5 times more heat to the building, compared to burning gas to produce 1x heat. So, you need to produce only 1/3rd to 1/5th of the energy for the same end result. You don't have to believe me. Look at the US Energy consumption charts from Lawrence Livermore National Lab. 67.5% of the energy consumed in the US is just wasted as rejected energy. That is more than two thirds of energy going to waste. Electrification needs to replace only the actually useful 32%! Adding another 10% losses takes it to 35% of today's energy system. That means we need more electricity in the future. But far less total primary energy in our system. But the best moment of this video is around 14 minutes. An Exxon Mobil Chairman & CEO says that they always understood that climate change is man-made and driven by CO2 added to the atmosphere! After claiming for years in the courts and in the public that they never knew. Just Wow!!
@De-tw7by
@De-tw7by 2 года назад
Oil companies fooled the govt and people so long and kept to use kerosene lamp, now everyone realised it's time to switch from kerosene lamp to high effect and zero pollution LED lamp. It is time to dump oil and move to high efficient and less pollutant EV.
@osoquik4447
@osoquik4447 2 года назад
You always hear about electrification this and that but no one speaks on how they will resolve the power generation needs for this type of future. FYI fossil fuels make up the majority of electricity generation in the US. Plenty of “green” examples in Europe and you see the result of going green especially during an energy crisis. Fossil fuels also provide the concept known as heat and power which will require a industrial sectors to completely revamp their process of creating steel, plastics, paint & etc. Easy concept on paper but who’s going foot that bill? Taxpayers, investors, governments?
@dgupta42
@dgupta42 2 года назад
@@osoquik4447 This interview was about specifics of oil & gas demand in an electric future. Vast majority of oil goes into transportation fuels, as all data clearly shows. That demand will slowly decline over the next 15-20 years, and ExxonMobil and other oil & gas companies are just not prepared for it. The fact that other sectors like industrial manufacturing may continue to need some fossil fuels in 2040 is not disputed by most. It just doesn't do anything to save O&G from the massive demand destruction coming up in sectors like transportation and building heat. I agree that the decline curve will not be smooth, there will be ugly disruptions on the way. That is normal for fossil fuels. O&G markets have always been cyclical and subject to geopolitics. That's now new. Every major price boom leads to a bust and vice versa. Frankly, Putin's war is a gift to O&G companies at the cost of ordinary people. The extra tens of billions of Oil & Gas profits should help fund their move to clean energy. Of course, it may have the exactly opposite effect of lulling these companies into false sense of security.
@rlcsite
@rlcsite 2 года назад
It might not come about soon, but it has to work. Some areas will continue to need fuel for power for a really long time.
@buckymoto
@buckymoto 2 года назад
This entire interview was a massive nothing-burger. The CEO basically said they don't want to invest in greener technologies cause they don't see a need to. They think it's more economically viable to recapture carbon emissions, but don't want to commit to doing it because there aren't government incentives or demand. And their estimates that demand will be similar to '13-14 years if ALL EVs are on the road? Their profit margins are MASSIVE from Transportation and Oil Demands from Transportation... they think they're going to maintain those levels by making plastic products? Give me a break. Massive nothing burger of an interview and it boils down to "We're not changing anything."
@Mistro07
@Mistro07 2 года назад
Go cry about it..EVs have a looooong way to go before they can replace ICE engines..the cars/tech themselves might not, but everything around them (infrastructure, cost, etc.) have a long way to go
@De-tw7by
@De-tw7by 2 года назад
@@Mistro07 it is very easy to replace ICE with EV. Oil companies where fooling us until Tesla and Chinese govt. demonstrated it. World largest population China is already on EV.
@thomasgibson1028
@thomasgibson1028 2 года назад
Best comment I’ve seen here yet.
@Son37Lumiere
@Son37Lumiere 2 года назад
@@Mistro07 ICE is out, seems like you and the rest of the oil industry lackeys are the ones crying about it. The infrastructure doesn't need nearly as much upgrading as the pro oil propaganda wants you to believe.
@Son37Lumiere
@Son37Lumiere 2 года назад
And people are starting to move away from plastic as well as they're realizing it's yet another pollution heavy product of the disgusting oil industry of which only 5% actually gets recycled.
@lancemarshall241
@lancemarshall241 11 месяцев назад
How do you regenerate oil that's been pumped out of the ground?
@morpher44
@morpher44 2 года назад
split fit: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HsnjcVjBiwM.html
@progressreason_1
@progressreason_1 2 года назад
Exxon is waking up to reality
@DSS-jj2cw
@DSS-jj2cw 2 года назад
I will believe it when i see it.
@sepase2676
@sepase2676 2 года назад
EVs are not the future, public transit and high speed trains are.
@SaltySparrow
@SaltySparrow 2 года назад
Yeah and this is why gas companies are cranking up prices. It’s the last gasp of air before they switch over
@aminesaib
@aminesaib 2 года назад
Intersting take.
@lancemarshall241
@lancemarshall241 11 месяцев назад
What's Exxon's relationship with the EPA, currently?
@fluxfaze
@fluxfaze 2 года назад
Exxon-Mobile. Destroyers of Earth.
@JasonKing247
@JasonKing247 Год назад
There’s a demand for carbon in the air because the technology hasn’t progressed enough to meet the current demand… is this an argument or a statement on how they’re not helping the situation.
@jamesmaduabuchi6100
@jamesmaduabuchi6100 2 года назад
The stock market has been a really tough one this past year, but I watched an interview on CNBC where the anchor kept mentioning " TERESA JENSEN WHITE ". This prompted me to get in touch with her, and from March 2022 till now we have been working together, and I can now boast of $540,000 in my trading portfolio.
@wilsonjudson1650
@wilsonjudson1650 2 года назад
That's right, getting in touch with a consultant during the pandemic was how I was able to scale through the crazy stock downtrend.
@dorissteve912
@dorissteve912 2 года назад
That's massive. Can you please connect me with your personal broker, I would love to work with her
@jamesmaduabuchi6100
@jamesmaduabuchi6100 2 года назад
Like I said previously, her name is TERESA JENSEN WHITE , and you can reach her via her website.
@jamesmaduabuchi6100
@jamesmaduabuchi6100 2 года назад
Just run a search on her name, and you would see all you need.
@dorissteve912
@dorissteve912 2 года назад
thanks for the info . Found her website and it impressive
@lancemarshall241
@lancemarshall241 5 месяцев назад
Is the current Catholic Church liable for the actions of Cortez in South America despite drastic policy change?
@kingrichard7935
@kingrichard7935 2 года назад
75% gas Vehicles 20% Electric vehicle oil is the economics of the world ,
@75robg
@75robg 2 года назад
That is a joke. If there's nothing but electric vehicles by 2040, then ExxonMobil will be out of business. There's no way they could replicate their numbers in 2013 & 2014, that's impossible.
@MrBadbonesaw
@MrBadbonesaw 2 года назад
Maybe they could focus on rocket fuel for Space X LOL
@mrswjr4061
@mrswjr4061 2 года назад
The oil companies aren’t going to “take a hit” because they will fueling the power stations that generate the electricity everyone will have to plug into. 😂
@gmv0553
@gmv0553 2 года назад
And that is why Aptera will succeed in their solar mobility movement!
@googlebanmetoomuch2601
@googlebanmetoomuch2601 2 года назад
What does he think of government price controls?🤔
@Mistro07
@Mistro07 2 года назад
He just sells to another country and the one with the controls get screwed
@Son37Lumiere
@Son37Lumiere 2 года назад
@@Mistro07 Higher prices will incentivize people to move to better alternatives.
@lancemarshall241
@lancemarshall241 5 месяцев назад
Have you studied the history of European exploration before the Industrial Revolution?
@lancemarshall241
@lancemarshall241 5 месяцев назад
What can I buy in American cities with a check from a Panamanian Bank?
@bocanjm215
@bocanjm215 2 года назад
I'm glad they're changing their view on green energy. Wind turbines, solar panels, batteries, plastics, etc are all made using oil. Their business isn't going anywhere.
@jasonrock5220
@jasonrock5220 2 года назад
Let’s increase taxes and everyone can be voluntold to pay more money for less energy because the government calls it “clean” energy. I think if everyone pays the government more money we will save the world. lol 😂
@weirdshibainu
@weirdshibainu 2 года назад
The CEO is mocking the CNBC interviewer
@timogul
@timogul 2 года назад
The problem is though "where [Exxon] is today," is where Exxon should have been twenty years ago, and then they would be in an even better place today. Instead, Exxon has always chosen to take the most profitable course, even if it's also the most destructive. Every generation, Exxon will shed crocodile tears about how they are better than they were a generation ago, and how they're "just getting started" at doing the right thing, when everyone was telling them to "just get started" a generation previous to that. When will they ever get out _ahead_ of problems and not cause damage that they need to clean up later? If Exxon had started working toward a carbon neutral future two decades ago, then it would be much less stressful to do it today.
@rolandotillit2867
@rolandotillit2867 2 года назад
Nonsense. Carbon neutrality is a pipe dream, and Mr. Wood's approach is correct. We can't switch to full electric cars, the grid can't handle it without huge infrastructure expenditures. I respect his solution focused approach instead of preaching pipe dream solutions that will cost just as much and likely deliver less value.
@timogul
@timogul 2 года назад
@@rolandotillit2867 We can't switch 100% to Electric cars _tomorrow_ because we haven't been investing into it, but if we had been investing into it 10-15 years ago, then we would be ready today to do so, and if we invest enough today, then we will be ready for it 5-10 years from now. That's the point, Exxon spent decades doing the worst things possible because it was the most profitable, and now they want brownie points for doing the bare _minimum_ to be "less bad." Exxon has made outrageous profits over the last few years, they should be posting losses. They should be spending more money than they make toward fixing the harm they've caused, to make up for the profits that they'd been making while fighting against the climate change discussion.They did wrong. They owe a debt more than "we'll do slightly less wrong over time, while maintaining high profit margins."
@rolandotillit2867
@rolandotillit2867 2 года назад
@@timogul I sincerely doubt that.
@timogul
@timogul 2 года назад
@@rolandotillit2867 That's just because you have not done your research. You'll get there eventually, as Exxon did.
@rolandotillit2867
@rolandotillit2867 2 года назад
@@timogul The only reason Exxon considered it, was because of the useless activists that infiltrated the board. Make no mistake, they are ineffective and have no concrete plans.
@williamharding9753
@williamharding9753 2 года назад
ExxonMobil will become a shell of the former company in the near future
@ronbakker1300
@ronbakker1300 2 года назад
Shell of the former company, that's funny.
@bbarn3973
@bbarn3973 2 года назад
People are hoping Exxon fails.... If exxon breaks even at $41/barrel(and going down) and they are producing 5 mm barrels/day and oil is say $100/barrel. That's 295 mm/day. Exxon pays a dividend of 3.7 bb/quarter. That's 12 days to cover the dividend nut. Exxon and Chevron are proceeding very cautiously. They were both burnt in the past. Oil went below 0/barrel. No congressman rushed to help exxon or chevron but now they cry foul when fortunes have turned. Exxon is a 366 bb company. What would a shell of a company look like? Progressive democrats would have to have complete control and crash the economy as we know it for exxon to be a "shell" of itself. AOC(head of progressive democrats) touts political rhetoric to hold her position but she has very little understanding of actual economics. Her actions illustrate a "good for thee but not for me" entitlement that most politicians enjoy.
@jasonrock5220
@jasonrock5220 2 года назад
Funny statement but not true. 10 years from now most people will still be driving gasoline fueled vehicles.
@ronbakker1300
@ronbakker1300 2 года назад
@@jasonrock5220 I think until at least 2030 there will be unfulfilled demand for electric vehicles, and that 65% of new cars will be electric, but the will be a very large fleet of ice cars still on the road.
@lancemarshall241
@lancemarshall241 2 года назад
What corporate structures own Nuclear Power Plants?
@Boxagami
@Boxagami 2 года назад
Since when did CNBC start censoring comments?
@TwoLargePizzas
@TwoLargePizzas 2 года назад
According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), Petroleum is the main source of energy for transportation. In 2021, petroleum products accounted for about *90%* of the total U.S. transportation sector energy use. Biofuels contributed about 6%. Natural gas accounted for about 4%, most of which was used in natural gas pipeline compressors. Electricity use by mass transit systems provided less than 1% of total transportation sector energy use. Even though transportation only accounts for 28% of the total US energy consumption in 2021 and the other 72% goes to electric power, industrial, residential, and commercial, that is still a hefty chunk. You sitting here telling me that by 2040 Exxon is still gonna be alive? Exxon must have transformed into a diff company by then.
@osoquik4447
@osoquik4447 2 года назад
Transportation is dominated by petroleum but industrial and residential/commercial have a more diversified energy mix. By 2050, we may see a petro come down quite a bit however, US producers could simply export any surplus. Globally, petroleum and natural gas consumption has continued to increase while developed nations have undergone a change in theirs.
@bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770
@bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770 2 года назад
Plenty of people will still be driving 15-20 year old gasoline vehicles in 2040. Look around you, I see early 2000s models all the time. And they will be cheap.
@mdm8732
@mdm8732 2 года назад
Lol of coarse exon knew about it. Just didn't do anything till it is now affecting their $$
@joshuacook2
@joshuacook2 2 года назад
If you look at it, and just imagine that carbon capture works, it would be awesome. So won't you buy our PR BS?
@Solar.Geoengineering.Advocate
@Solar.Geoengineering.Advocate 6 месяцев назад
thats what pure unadulterated evil looks like.
@upstateNYfinest
@upstateNYfinest 2 года назад
He is right tho, it will cut global natural gas use arpund the world, but not by a significant amount tbh
@masaharumorimoto4761
@masaharumorimoto4761 2 года назад
Internal Combustion or GTFO, Electric has it's place, but out here in the country in the middle of nowhere Canada we need a real truck.
@Jigsaw_knows
@Jigsaw_knows 2 года назад
This ready to retire hypocrite could care less
@petername2608
@petername2608 2 года назад
Is this a joke
@jasonrock5220
@jasonrock5220 2 года назад
Yes sir, This is the biggest joke perpetrated in American history. It’s called “man-made” global warming. The greatest guilt trip ever that was designed to increase energy costs and make people voluntarily pay more money for less energy.
@bru512
@bru512 2 года назад
Dennis is predicting that ICE vehicles will be sold until 2040? Tony Seba is predicting that this will happen well before 2030. Dennis is hoping to fool people with Hydrogen fuel despite it's huge cost and production of CO2. This interview will not age well.
@jasonkiminseoul
@jasonkiminseoul 2 года назад
ICE cars might be sold only until the 2030s in developed countries(North America, EU, China, Japan, and South Korea) but it will take some time for developing countries to catch up, so I would say 2040 is a realistic forecast.
@gopalrathi9810
@gopalrathi9810 2 года назад
Here we go again with propoganda
@DanA-nl5uo
@DanA-nl5uo 2 года назад
With all the hot air he is blowing he should look into wind power he could definitely provide the fuel for a few wind turbines in this interview alone.
@johnthompson7548
@johnthompson7548 2 года назад
Nice commercial for Exxon
@spiffyh
@spiffyh 2 года назад
We already have a carbon capture system. It is called plants. But what he is talking about is an industrial carbon capture system so that they can extract MORE money from the problem they created in the first place.
@Patmorgan235Us
@Patmorgan235Us 2 года назад
execpt we've dug up/pumped out trillions of tons of carbon out of the ground. it took millions of years for that carbon to be sequestered there. Plants are not sufficient.
@fritzstauffacher6931
@fritzstauffacher6931 2 года назад
The problem they created? Lol everything you use is from fossil fuel. We got to work together not point blame on the engineering that fuels the modern world.
@joejoey7272
@joejoey7272 2 года назад
Carbon capture is just greenwashing , it’s a way for these companies to pretend like they are doing something
@idontcare6662
@idontcare6662 2 года назад
The amount of plants we currently have aren't yes, however it is effective and If we built our cities and towns to be more pedestrian friendly and left more nature in urban areas, yea it would make a big difference actually. Among many other things we aren't doing, it's all talking heads and nobody doing.
@PG-3462
@PG-3462 2 года назад
It's not the problem that THEY created, but that WE created with our lifestyle and behaviors. You can't blame Exxon for producing something we all overconsume on a daily basis.
@enriqueoliveram
@enriqueoliveram 2 года назад
I used to work for Exxon, now ExxonMobil, since a long time, the company has invested in investigation and new technologies, one of them is MTG, converts methanol into gasoline, methanol used to be produced from natural gas, now is going to be produced using green hydrogen, that means, a way to produce fuels directly from solar and wind energy
@lesliehatun2044
@lesliehatun2044 Год назад
Where's the result? Where's the price relief? Since 1979 it all jibberish.
@matthewhenrysmith7498
@matthewhenrysmith7498 2 года назад
Absence of nuclear in this conversation is telling.
@bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770
@bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770 2 года назад
@@IOFLOOD “only good for baseload power” - as if that’s a problem? The problem with wind and solar is that they can’t produce consistent dnergy
@Son37Lumiere
@Son37Lumiere 2 года назад
Nuclear has always been a dead end for a large number of reasons that always get glossed over and ignored by nuclear advocates.
@slimjim3229
@slimjim3229 2 года назад
Geothermal is the most overlooked option out there. It time it gets more attention. It can help.
@robitmcclain6107
@robitmcclain6107 2 года назад
DOE is investing in using enhanced geothermal using depleated gas wells.
@ivywhite9589
@ivywhite9589 2 года назад
Nuclear power is best, but nukes are used to distract from it.
@ivywhite9589
@ivywhite9589 2 года назад
The world has been at war for a long time, WW1 & WW2 is used to distract from that.
@bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770
@bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770 2 года назад
Peanuts compared to potential of nuclear
@romeou4965
@romeou4965 2 года назад
Planned Bitcoin city in El Salvador is prime example
@timothydevries383
@timothydevries383 2 года назад
He's right. Everyone focuses on personal transport because that's what's easy to understand. In reality personal transport is only about 7% of global CO2 emissions.
@daydreamer8373
@daydreamer8373 2 года назад
The thing is EV's are the catalyst for huge changes in how we create, store and use energy. There are massive changes coming, EV's are just the start.
@mozambique9113
@mozambique9113 2 года назад
The evolution of humans mind can make us transport without moving our bodies are more reliable and sustainable.
@dlewis8405
@dlewis8405 2 года назад
I wonder if he logs in as Wayne Tracker whenever he needs to discuss climate change internally on the Exxon email system.
@Ryanlexz
@Ryanlexz 2 года назад
AOC and Bernie Sanders is having a hard time 😂😂
@johnzhao3086
@johnzhao3086 2 года назад
I like the snake oil he’s selling. I’m gonna buy some!
@Gary-ec4lc
@Gary-ec4lc 2 года назад
He Dreaming , bye bye Exxon , it’s all about cost , ev Trucks are far cheaper and more powerful and improving. Get with the program all these renewable issues have been overcome , he simply has not done the numbers….$
@Backseatobserver0075
@Backseatobserver0075 2 года назад
Somebody needs to tell him it’s going to be much sooner than 2040 , considering some countries car registration last month have been as high as 70% EV .
@bitcoindaddy1
@bitcoindaddy1 2 года назад
Most ppl dont realize the USD is pegged to crude oil (petrodollar), well...if world moving away from crude into EVs. Theres no need for world to hold USDs. Exxon revenue and emmisions is least of US problem
@spriteNchoke
@spriteNchoke 2 года назад
Which countries are that? I bet only the rich developed countries. I am from a poor country where rolling blackouts are still a monthly thing. Many poor countries are like this. EVs are not viable in poor countries since no one can afford the charging stations and there are no mechanics or parts to fix the EVs. This is where Exxon will get the demand for its products to make up for the lack of demand in rich countries like the USA.
@bitcoindaddy1
@bitcoindaddy1 2 года назад
@@spriteNchoke poor countries just need to migrate out of dollar debt...and also leap frog tech development if they choose to...developed countries will have harder time because they are source of the problem
@darinherrick9224
@darinherrick9224 2 года назад
@@spriteNchoke You have it exactly backwards. Poor countries cannot afford gas but CAN afford solar power and other ways to generate electriity. They will find a way to charge vehicles with local charging solutions rather than imported ones. Since electrics break down less and have less parts that break they cannot afford NOT to transition to electric.
@darinherrick9224
@darinherrick9224 2 года назад
They won't be using Teslas and first world charging stations, but it would shock me if the third world doesn't rapidly switch to solar-powered low horsepower electric vehicles of some sort with a dirt-cheap price tag.
@dagarnertn
@dagarnertn 2 года назад
You’d almost think they’ve been hoping for the world to move beyond fossil fuels rather than actively fighting against such moves for decades.
@bjkarana
@bjkarana 2 года назад
How? You can order an EV online right now. Plus, oil and natural gas are used in all kinds of everyday things, from the electricity that powers your computer, to the plastic keys you used to type your comment.
@trevorssillyplace
@trevorssillyplace 2 года назад
They are probably rock hard thinking about evs. Powergrids will require more fuel to generate electricity taking into account all the power loss in transmission there probably will be more of a demand for oil lol
@RasakBlood
@RasakBlood 2 года назад
@@trevorssillyplace It will be a net loss of oil use. Gas cars are very inefficient. Power plants using gas will still be more efficient and use less gas then now. And this is ignoring the massive growth of solar and wind.
@trevorssillyplace
@trevorssillyplace 2 года назад
@@RasakBlood less than 5 percent of the powergrid is renewable. Increased power demand from consumers ie charging their evs will increase power demand from the power grid. If you run the numbers of how much gas is required to actually generate the 50kw to charge a tesla and the range it gets including the loss in transmission lines. It comes out to like 10 mpg about a 4th as efficient as a Honda civic. Teslas are sick but at this time ur only saving yourself money not the environment unless ur charging completly off the grid.
@jpcool95480
@jpcool95480 2 года назад
@@trevorssillyplace depends on the country. A quick Wikipedia search says almost 20% of the US electricity produced is renewable. And if you add nuclear that is even more.
@masaharumorimoto4761
@masaharumorimoto4761 2 года назад
Fantastic interview, really enjoyed this one!!!
@Michael-il5wd
@Michael-il5wd 2 года назад
as batteries get better and cheaper, it will disrupt more than just consumer vehicles. It will change how to drive, fly and sail. I wonder if they've considered this.
@happyscrub
@happyscrub 2 года назад
Batteries are not going to get cheaper. EV demand and global politics are driving up the the demand for the minerals.
@alfredobras6043
@alfredobras6043 2 года назад
Boa tarde, gostaria trabalhar com vosco can i have this opportunity to work with the company?
@SolvingTheMoneyProblem
@SolvingTheMoneyProblem 2 года назад
👀
@vonBottorff
@vonBottorff 2 года назад
If oil is truly a non-renewable resource then destroying it by burning is insane. We have no viable replacement for hydrocarbon-based plastics and other chemical products. Long-term they're more important than transportation.
@AnimeBeefRandoms
@AnimeBeefRandoms 2 года назад
Not burning it and leaving it in the ground is not very useful to humans either.
@Thelango99
@Thelango99 2 года назад
@@AnimeBeefRandoms The user implies prioritizing chemical production over burning for fuel. I agree with this approach more. Oil has so many applications that just burning it is comparatively wasteful.
@planefan082
@planefan082 2 года назад
​@@Thelango99 Exactly. Nor is burning it even profitable compared to renewable generation in most places without huge fossil fuel subsidies.
@Batmangutten
@Batmangutten 2 года назад
We have more than enough oil for all the worlds plastics and petrochemicals. This would still be the case if we continued to use oil for energy throughout this century. Also, oil is renewable in the sense that all it would take to make oil is to pull the carbon back out of the air and make oil. The only downside here is that it requires enormous amounts of energy. This wouldn't be practical for energy use and we still have cheaper oil for petrochemicals and plastics which is why we aren't currently doing it. However, in the future with solar getting cheaper and new breakthroughs in fusion and geothermal, (see Quaise, Zap Energy and Helion Energy) we will for all intents and purposes have unlimited energy. Running out of petrochemicals will therefore not be a problem.
@eazolan
@eazolan 2 года назад
We don't have a replacement for getting oil out of the ground. But we can get it out of the air.
@petertatt
@petertatt 2 года назад
Bio-fuels and carbon capture? Really! So depressing. We will never get to net zero if guys like this get their way.
@bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770
@bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770 2 года назад
How about you actually contribute and explain why you object to either of those
@ninjaatheist
@ninjaatheist 2 года назад
When carbon dioxide is stored underground in a process known as geological sequestration, it can find multiple escape pathways due to chemical reactions between carbon dioxide, water, rocks and cement from abandoned wells, according to Penn State researchers.
@robertlee8805
@robertlee8805 2 года назад
Wishing they'd add Biofuels to their mix.
@rad2gnarly9
@rad2gnarly9 2 года назад
Aw geez too bad more research can't be done
@ronaldgarrison8478
@ronaldgarrison8478 2 года назад
It doesn't have to be perfect, nor does it have to be forever. No, that is not a fundamental barrier.
@ryhol5417
@ryhol5417 2 года назад
Why are we giving them free advertising and why isn’t this labeled as advertising?
@concernedrn2844
@concernedrn2844 2 года назад
This is such BS
@leesmith9299
@leesmith9299 2 года назад
delusional
@thomasgaudette7367
@thomasgaudette7367 2 года назад
He's completely lost the plot.
@lancemarshall241
@lancemarshall241 11 месяцев назад
WOULD YOU INVEST IN A TECHNOLOGY BASED ON SCIENTIFIC THEORIES YOU DON'T FULLY COMPREHEND??? There’s a lot more to it than that. In fact when Einstein developed the special and general theories of relativity I believe at that time only about 10 other people on Earth understood it; a lot of complicated math and physics! He had to study parts of various disciplines to come up with it. They called it an Amazing discovery with no practical use, at least at that time! NOW THE SPECIAL AND GENERAL THEORIES OF RELATIVITY ARE FUNDAMENTAL IN SPACE AND SATELLITE TECHNOLOGIES SUCH AS GPS!!!
@quartytypo
@quartytypo 2 года назад
Don't bother, ExxonMobil. Nobody wants and EV except wind turbine huggers.
@jonraborn-nd1zq
@jonraborn-nd1zq Год назад
Biblical revelations : the project manager of the construction & planning of the new heavens & earth : the establishment of the thousand years of peace on earth :. coop stuff to think no about : youth ministries & adult bible study : the achitecs &; facilitator's &;world-wide project management
@ninjaatheist
@ninjaatheist 2 года назад
The sooner these dinosaur companies die the better!
@fleshreap
@fleshreap 2 года назад
ExxonMobil must be paying a ton for all these videos.
@lancemarshall241
@lancemarshall241 11 месяцев назад
AVIATION, OIL FOR MACHINES INCLUDING ELECTRIC ONES provides a future for oil. However, when all the oil is pumped out of the ground and spewed into the atmosphere will society collapse if and electric based infrastructure is present at that time?
@lesliehatun2044
@lesliehatun2044 Год назад
So rich , wealthy and they need incentives ? Mobile needs incentives? 💰 Yet talk about green and red hydrogen. Why should consumers, taxpayers, give money to a company that's RICH beyond belief. What kind of guy talks hope then threatens us? These guys been Ying yang ing since 1979. It's all talk and no new technology. What the hell have they been doing? All the taxpayer money they get AND NO RESULT SINCE 1979?
@bjkarana
@bjkarana 2 года назад
EVs don't have point source pollution and that is good for local air quality, but people also need to understand that EV manufacture emits a lot more CO2 than making combustion engine vehicles, so the lifetime savings in CO2 (as of 2022) is not substantial. EV carbon footprints will likely improve over time, but the world still needs quite a lot of oil and natural gas to, ironically, enable the transition away from oil and natural gas.
@TrevorStandley
@TrevorStandley 2 года назад
I think I saw a calculation for this and it's really not that different. And can be done better than ice cars in many circumstances.
@MrBadbonesaw
@MrBadbonesaw 2 года назад
We should probably be looking to transition to electric mopeds or trikes instead of EV Cars and EV SUVs/Trucks. Less traffic, less wear and tear on roads and same mileage for 1/10 battery size. Not practical for long distances but for 85% of my commuting it would be a good use.
@TrevorStandley
@TrevorStandley 2 года назад
@@MrBadbonesaw There are also kids to consider. And the transportation of stuff, so the roads will always have to support cars and trucks.
@JenniferVirgen-fx8tz
@JenniferVirgen-fx8tz 11 месяцев назад
I wanted to ask a question I no every company has there policies. In Abu Dhabi United. ExxonMobil oil drilling. After they finish their job. Are charging the workers to get there certified of finishing $1.000. And that's not right. Some of them gentleman and females. Have family. That's not fair. It's for security. Not good
@benbohannon
@benbohannon 9 месяцев назад
The global energy supply has changed over history and will continue to change. Biomass. Whale oil. Kerosene. Leaded. Unleaded. Natural gas. Nuclear. Wind. Solar. Pop Rocks.
@stephendoherty8291
@stephendoherty8291 Год назад
So ExxonMobil should start buying petrochemical companies so they don't source non-oil ingredients. I suspect bigoil would prefer to sell to bigger users. Shipping/cement/big industry and natural gas (with CCS). Bigoil is praying that its politicians will buy into CCS so they can offer a reverse money maker ie pay is to send the carbon back down. The IPCC report does mention that CCS will be needed but the economics are NOWHERE near the cost thats affordable. Bigoil has also done alot to cut the extraction cost of oil since the oil price fall and now its war related bumper profits and bumper management bonuses. Meantime demand keeps rising. Interesting to see that Exxon don't consider nuclear and battery cannot bridge the gap. So meantime Exxon are saying we will "invest in tech for the miracle changes" and just keep working as usual. Pity Exxon lied about climate change for so long. 2050 as a target will not be accepted by shareholders for just carbon neutrality.
@jjerome8867
@jjerome8867 2 года назад
What a leader for XOM! Vision plus…
@Gary-ec4lc
@Gary-ec4lc 2 года назад
Red Flag 🚩 here
@NashHinton
@NashHinton 2 года назад
About time.
@lancemarshall241
@lancemarshall241 5 месяцев назад
If Exxon mobile has a language barrier, try learning the natives languages with Apple’s products! They’re cheaper and more efficient than Universities as well as portable!
@robertlee8805
@robertlee8805 2 года назад
Burn, 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 and MORE BURNING FOSSIL FUELS. Love that don't you LOVE all that SMOG?
@jonraborn-nd1zq
@jonraborn-nd1zq Год назад
Electric & CNG fuel : george jettson fkying vehicaks 2024 Austin tx.hog eye rd. Mobile loaves & fishes inc.
@raulsantinolopezrodriguez8349
@raulsantinolopezrodriguez8349 2 года назад
El poder y el control que ejercieron con la tecnología de combustibles de hace dos siglos atrás, a excepción de algunas mejoras y retirarle el plomo, a ahora ya dejarán avanzar realmente en la tecnología de los combustibles y así avanzará la humanidad en su tecnología en otros ámbitos, aunado al retraso tecnológico de los vehículos.
@williamharding9753
@williamharding9753 2 года назад
ExxonMobil need to put their profits into building wind and solar farms
@romeou4965
@romeou4965 2 года назад
But CEO clearly said XOM is not in the power generation industry. Instead they manipulate hydrocarbons.
@shadfletcher6815
@shadfletcher6815 2 года назад
No they do not.....unlike your suggestions...nuclear makes power 24 hours a day
@bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770
@bellamafiaquackafellarecor7770 2 года назад
Not sure if you’re aware but the wind and sun aren’t always able to be harvested
@bjkarana
@bjkarana 2 года назад
That's like selling a car which starts 100% of the time (hydrocarbons), for a car that starts 50% of the time (wind and solar). Dumb...
@tomblandford
@tomblandford 2 года назад
Why would they want to do that? That industry is very competitive and they have no knowledge. And they are not a charity.
@TedTabaka
@TedTabaka 2 года назад
Fuel is not going away! Exxon needs to switch from a gas and diesel company to a hydrogen generating, plastic producing, and renewable only company. This CEO just does not see the future of the company and that is why it will fail in 40 years.
@ronaldgarrison8478
@ronaldgarrison8478 2 года назад
Talking biofuels, carbon capture, hydrogen. So predictable. EVs are only going to be a "small portion" of the picture. Riiiight.
@lancemarshall241
@lancemarshall241 11 месяцев назад
Have you ever considered utilizing "dirty money" to help finance corporate infrastructure? How does one define "dirty money," that which is derived from cocaine trafficking?
@glennschaub560
@glennschaub560 2 года назад
When did Exxon Mobile get involved with producing electrical power plants ?
@william53
@william53 2 года назад
Interview much better than CNBC Faber’s Exxon-at-the Crossrodes show. Business exists to fulfill a consumer need. That is what Exxon attempts to do each day - we are blessed to have such a thoughtful business!
@erikk77
@erikk77 2 года назад
Yes, the problem is we have too many consumers. Reduce the number of consumers. That will reduce the need more toxic mining and drilling. Stop having kids.
@tornadosirenwednesday
@tornadosirenwednesday Год назад
Thoughtful business??? EXXON?? LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
@robertfield4103
@robertfield4103 2 года назад
This guy has no clue on the economics and engineering of carbon capture. There is no magic bullet for carbon capture, the chemistry and thermodynamics have been known for 100 years.
@tanujSE
@tanujSE Год назад
It's good if we have things for future,capitalist did revolutionize the means of production,communist manifesto says this and it doesn't mean capitalist capital and profit won't be catastrophe on earth where we live or won't come in conflict of majority for fundamental needs and shifting the economics back to fundamental needs only
@olavthewiking3700
@olavthewiking3700 2 года назад
EV is a toy. I have m y V8 BMW, pushing the metal, the fire blows out from exchaust. this is power. EV is for hobos
@unxusr
@unxusr 2 года назад
🤮 want to throw up listening this biggest polluter. Only steep Carbon Tax can level completion for everyone who really wants to build carbon free energy.
@pargevkarapetyan2251
@pargevkarapetyan2251 2 года назад
Smart guy and thinks telling very logical and offering right solutions . I hope thay truthful and on mission helping fix global worming and carbon emissions problems.
@logtron
@logtron 2 года назад
He's smart and good at talking, but the solutions are all wrong. Those solutions are just in the best interest in extending the usefulness of Exxon's assets as long as possible. Remember that he is the CEO of Exxon, he only cares about profits.
@ebubeawachie
@ebubeawachie 2 года назад
@@logtron as he should be 🤷🏾‍♂️
@lancemarshall241
@lancemarshall241 5 месяцев назад
When the European explorers sailed the globe on wooden wind powered ships their was successfully business and some very nasty exchanges!
@pablosel3857
@pablosel3857 2 года назад
This company is only focused on oil and gas prices and cares about nothing else. The company is extremely traditional in the way they do things and that's partly because they've never been challenged with trying to find ways to cope with financial struggle. Since all they do is extract crude from the ground and then refine it, and that's how it's always been, they were never pushed into changing their mindset. So if they cannot do simple things like automating easy processes or conducting IT implementations, why should I believe these guys will ever shift their ways of producing? Plus they have a perverse ideology. They see employees as part od the cost equation, so regardless of your merit within the organisation, they will dump you if they have to or simply let you go no questions asked. They do the same with inflation, postponing as much as they can every possible salary adjustment, and with other regulations as well. If a company behaves terrible with its employees, I do not really think this company has any good intentions at all.
@Ryanlexz
@Ryanlexz 2 года назад
Using Electric cars ain't gonna solve climate change lmao
@pablosel3857
@pablosel3857 2 года назад
@@Ryanlexz What does that even have to do with what I said? I dont know about that, though, really.
@MyUniversalUniversity
@MyUniversalUniversity 2 года назад
A few things. Whatever this guy is saying does not mean that it’s true and does not mean that they are at a point where he’s says they are! The other issue is is that he thinks they are going to be able to work with energy creation. It’s transitioning extremely quick. California had two days in the last month and a half that were 100% renewable, as far as energy for the state. Renewable energy for homes, and companies is going way faster then EV’s. I am skeptical, and I don’t think they are smart enough to believe in 2040 all cars sold may be electric. The last issue of Gas is going to run out at something.
@mikeharrison3618
@mikeharrison3618 2 года назад
The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels. ALEX EPSTEIN 's "Fossil Future" on sale now June,2022. HUMAN flourishing
Далее
Witch changes monster hair color 👻🤣 #shorts
00:51
Watermelon magic box! #shorts by Leisi Crazy
00:20
Просмотров 14 млн
Costco (Audio)
3:01:34
Просмотров 96 тыс.
How Removing Cobalt From Batteries Can Make EVs Cheaper
18:32