How false news can spread - Noah Tavlin 

Technology has only added fuel to the fire.

This is why the MSM hates when the DON Tweets cause they can't interpret for the public ???

thank you soo much

maybey were just being brain washed by the socale media FB False new's ectra

Gee - you think ??? @@jonathanlehmann8719

Gaurav arya 🤣🤣🤣🤣

That is true-true.

Abraham Lincoln was ahead of his time.

Isn’t that internet 101 and lol really Abraham Lincoln 😂😂😂😂

Gaurav arya I thought it was Teddy Roosevelt

That quote was said by Cleopatra.

@@AdyanshSahai

nice reply bro

When my parents sent me a video regarding how smartphones are disastrous to your eyes and the information within it is false, but your parents would believe it otherwise because its facebook duh 🥱

Common sense is sadly Not so common .

Agreed, and cannot ignore the polar opposite of people grasping some BS somewhere else and running with it just as emotionally invested. Both sides need to study what they speak of, to form opinions worth listening to. It's litterally bad on both sides.

@@augustusmaximus891what sides?

Never before has journalism been more biased. The voice over even sounds computer generated. COVID 19 was the beginning of it, please don't assume that what we are being fed right now is not misinformation suiting the agenda of those who benefit from your willingness to be led and programme.d

WoW HE rEAllY sAId That?

I actually had to read this 4 times to realise what was wrong with it XD

Is YOur QuOte FrOm The inTeRneT?

100% TRuE

@@sophi765 It PRObablY Is

I have tried the approach, doesn't end well.

Yeah that usually doesnt end well. At some point i thought that i was likely living in a North Korea like country which has the landmass of the entire world.But goverment isolated me from learning about it and i and you guys think that we are the only sentient species.

I must hide this book beforr HE finds it.

Be a goblin and turn into gollum

Not even your self

The LoopDigger *Digga

This is why the MSM hates when the DON Tweets cause they can't interpret for the public ???

I agree

i have created short film on this topic...ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UpDDVFsnt00.html

literally every teded video starts with the phrase “lessons worth sharing” literally shut up

Sake fews😂😂

This information is supported by Thomas Newton

@@awesomegaming1991 Albert Hawking supports that too

Dont forget he was creator of Moon and fist guy who stepped on Space.

@Naysha Singh nah fam it's Abraham Einstein. Read again.

😂😂😂

cilckbati

Hmmm yes makes sense

Ah yes Newton invented relativity and Einstein discovered inertia.

*totally ignores when these people were alive*

Yes I agree he is great at spreading propaganda.

@@hughgasey9666 How false news can spread - Noah Tavlin

@@hughgasey9666 Cite a source that he spreads propaganda.

Xolette je

And that kids is fake news

This is why the MSM hates when the DON Tweets cause they can't interpret for the public ???

Hellya

This should be shown nowadays

Yep. My mother listening to Taliban propaganda on the radio (we still have radio in Afghanistan) and then sharing it with everyone as facts.

*Was

*Was

@@javieralejandrotrianapaz6343 Joke

@@javieralejandrotrianapaz6343 Guys, I found a wikipedia editor!

@@10pitate I bet he monitors the 9-11 page on wikipedia. lol

I love how this comment is still relevant to this day

I'm gonna need to hear it from 9 other people before I believe this.

@@helderboymh its true

@@pocket3216 that's two.

@@helderboymh it’s true

@@BrigsbyDowers that's 3

Yea this one should go on a tile or something

"We've finally arrived to the time when we can share information faster than we can understand it." --Cynthia Sonier (Just to make it sound cool)

+Bibek Gautam This problem is more severe than it looks and will only get worse.

Someone at college told me the same thing! He also said that I could go to a wiki page but to not get information from the article. Just go to the references at the bottom and get my info from there

WHOMEVER IS IN CONTROL "AT THE PARTICULAR MONMENT" SPREADS OUT CONSPIRACY AND ABOVE ALL FAKE NEWS........WHO'S IN CONTROL SINCE 2020???'''''THINK SHEE[EEEEPLES!!!

This video aged extremely well...

Yeah, me too.

+Stringer Bell Sheeeeeit, I thought you were dead.

+Mr. Poopybutthole That's because the Blank on Blank animator made the animation for this video.

Nothing travels faster than a dropped shampoo bottle in the shower.

Cant have autism if your dead

@Zain Mirza *A wild anti-vaxxer appeared!*

@Zain Mirza they think that its safer to risk catching the disease but they aren't considering the fact that if there were significant undisclosed side effects from vaccines they must be relatively rare and that not getting vaccinated opens one up to potential death or other lifelong issues and that its possible to spread that disease to others which could revive a near extinct virus

@Zain Mirza me driving recklessly is no big deal, since everyone else has seatbelts lol

@Zain Mirza lmao it totally is the same. If you don't vaccinate you are a potential carrier of the desease and thus a danger to everyone who cannot be vaccinated, like ill or elderly people. Not vaccinating is reckless behaviour.

Sun Tzu said that, and I'd say he knows a little more about fighting than you do, pal, because he invented it, and then he perfected it so that no living man could best him in the ring of honor.

I don't really see people saying that....

I thought the comments were mocking the people who spread fake news

Well it was 5 years ago

BBC stopped hiring white people

And to be fair to all, both sides of the political stage can exaggerate. *Both.*

This is why the MSM hates when the DON Tweets cause they can't interpret for the public ???

You completely missed the main point of the video

Agreed 💯

Yeah, specially considering the constant propaganda spread by the Group of People Who Don't Agree With Me

"Maybe" - Mark Twain

@Time is Zero you should do some open minded research instead of looking for "research" that verifies VaCcInEs ArE bAd FoR yOu

“A lie is a lie” -Tark Mwain

depends on which is more believeable

that's C. H. Spurgeon mate.

CJ Hicks ditto

@@ineeddamoney ditto

It will always be relevant

Still relevant.

Personally don't even know what personally you are worth with nothing to personally aquire a little more complex misguided personal strategy for elivment of a Typests forecasting hypothesis to your mind. Your mind.

It has

Well telling them that tho I have a question I don't even know what it is sits on the fence to solve this easily.

Yes, like fine milk 🥛

Wiki has hundreds of editors who make sure that the website is factual, Twitter and Facebook do not

I'm disappointed in TedEd for ironically committing the same journalistic error that they are accusing others of doing. Where are his citations for the study he claims was debunked or any of the studies that supposedly debunked it? As far as I know, Andrew Wakefield's study never actually claimed that vaccines caused autism. He was studying a link between the MMR and digestive disorders, and happened to find a correlation with autism. I'd love to read the actual study but no one ever cites it when making these claims. That's poor journalism and circular reporting at it's finest.

@@Glumphett you can search for it dear. there are like tons of them. you really need to point this out just to criticize their works even tho it was accurate?

@@Glumphett In 1998, Andrew Wakefield and 12 of his colleagues[1] published a case series in the Lancet, which suggested that the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine may predispose to behavioral regression and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Despite the small sample size (n=12), the uncontrolled design, and the speculative nature of the conclusions, the paper received wide publicity, and MMR vaccination rates began to drop because parents were concerned about the risk of autism after vaccination.[2] Almost immediately afterward, epidemiological studies were conducted and published, refuting the posited link between MMR vaccination and autism.[3,4] The logic that the MMR vaccine may trigger autism was also questioned because a temporal link between the two is almost predestined: both events, by design (MMR vaccine) or definition (autism), occur in early childhood. The next episode in the saga was a short retraction of the interpretation of the original data by 10 of the 12 co-authors of the paper. According to the retraction, “no causal link was established between MMR vaccine and autism as the data were insufficient”.[5] This was accompanied by an admission by the Lancet that Wakefield et al.[1] had failed to disclose financial interests (e.g., Wakefield had been funded by lawyers who had been engaged by parents in lawsuits against vaccine-producing companies). However, the Lancet exonerated Wakefield and his colleagues from charges of ethical violations and scientific misconduct.[6] The Lancet completely retracted the Wakefield et al.[1] paper in February 2010, admitting that several elements in the paper were incorrect, contrary to the findings of the earlier investigation.[7] Wakefield et al.[1] were held guilty of ethical violations (they had conducted invasive investigations on the children without obtaining the necessary ethical clearances) and scientific misrepresentation (they reported that their sampling was consecutive when, in fact, it was selective). This retraction was published as a small, anonymous paragraph in the journal, on behalf of the editors.[8] The final episode in the saga is the revelation that Wakefield et al.[1] were guilty of deliberate fraud (they picked and chose data that suited their case; they falsified facts).[9] The British Medical Journal has published a series of articles on the exposure of the fraud, which appears to have taken place for financial gain.[10-13] It is a matter of concern that the exposé was a result of journalistic investigation, rather than academic vigilance followed by the institution of corrective measures. Readers may be interested to learn that the journalist on the Wakefield case, Brian Deer, had earlier reported on the false implication of thiomersal (in vaccines) in the etiology of autism.[14] However, Deer had not played an investigative role in that report.[14] Scientists and organizations across the world spent a great deal of time and money refuting the results of a minor paper in the Lancet and exposing the scientific fraud that formed the basis of the paper. Appallingly, parents across the world did not vaccinate their children out of fear of the risk of autism, thereby exposing their children to the risks of disease and the well-documented complications related thereto. Measles outbreaks in the UK in 2008 and 2009 as well as pockets of measles in the USA and Canada were attributed to the nonvaccination of children.[7] The Wakefield fraud is likely to go down as one of the most serious frauds in medical history.[9] this was published on ncbi's site (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) here's where you can read the whole article: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136032/

@@Glumphett I'm also disappointed because of people like you who love to find every hole just to criticize people who are trying to make this world a better place.

​@@Glumphett In case you don't want to read the article because it's too long, I'll simplify it. Andrew Wakefield's study is a fraud. Because of his "publications", parents were scared to vaccinate their kids. And many kids were infected when they weren't supposed to be. All because of his "finding". By the way, did you know that Andrew Wakefield is an anti-vaccine activist? So can you say that his study is not biased?

thats some you are talking about. real journalists do their research beforehands from varies sources before writing a piece, they go through facts check as well.

Ally Madison You can see it in the media EDIT: had to change a few words

I know exactly what you mean

Ad yay, someone agree with me and understand what I’m saying :D!

+robbbyyy25 No, shoutout to Radiohead, greatest band ever!

Why not both?

1984!

Freedoms know what you want. Wants a loyalty and opportunity to freshen your finished work counting the evidence of understanding by definition agreed at base levels of structures and integrity