HOW HACKING WORKS 

How hard is it to make cheat for mobile games like esp and magic bullet do you have any idea? Where should I start? Which language should I learn (I have little knowledge about c++)? Is there any website to start with?

how did you comment 7 days ago if this came out 8 hours ago??????????????

@@jasshand5373 because this video was in unlisted mode and the comment were added on the day of upload maybe that's my reasoning 🧐

@@jasshand5373 unlisted video

at 1:55, Rockstar lmao

Mix up the too. If Anti-Cheats can have AI so can cheats

@@vidal9747 That is probably where the market is going. Nice advice

you can create an AI aimbot

@@ooheureka Yes you can but it is not really necessary. Besides, A.I. development focuses way more on data science and that’s boring as fuck. Game development is way more creative (imo)

@@sudowtf You just changed from arguably the strongest computer science subdomain to the weakest. But hey, if it makes you happy

That's a really good idea, I have only changed the code so far.

and if we're talking about cs u can even go further and interface with the schemasystem to get field offsets dynamically (love cs2)

@@midge9740 schema only exists for stuff that's networked. Not everything is networked

I suggest copying the code and telling chatgpt to explain it for you, it basically takes a "screenshot" of the running processes, finds the right one with the name you give it and opens a handle to it so you can use RPM and WPM. There is also a GetModuleAddress that does the same thing but when it finds the module inside of the game it returns its address.

Living in Durban at the moment 👌👌

For opensourced games like minecraft etc you can make proxies which would be fully external and not modifying the game at all (even tho useless for minecraft, java and internal anticheat), but for most things Im pretty sure it would be easier to just modify memory. You would need to basically reimplement the whole protocol of the game otherwise, also obscure encryption changing each release etc

A lot of well-made online games go by the mantra of "don't trust the client", so there's a lot of validation done on the server-side to make sure your actions are legitimate. And then you have Dead by Daylight which doesn't even bother to check if your character is allowed to fly up off the ground and rapid-fire between hooked states, etc.

I never use offsets, I just recreate all relevant classes, makes it a lot easier to code complex hacks/bots

@@drunkenfarmer2513 same. Godbolt is my friend. If I have some kind of issue with structure definition, it's infinitely easier to debug with a structure than it is with raw offsets.

if you are defining game made structures in your program, you are still referring to the original location in memory which means you are still using offsets, its just a more user friendly way to look at it

@@voidsvibedev please read the comment

@@voidsvibedev also, from a maintenance standpoint, it's a whole different ballgame. Using offsets directly means you will have to update a bunch of offsets when the structure gets updated. If you use the structure, instead of hard coding offsets, you just need to update the structure definition. That's it. Nothing else needs to be updated. Field names are arbitrary.

Where can I find these courses? I'm currently reading the linux programming interface

@@user-sm5nf4cj3j Uh... they were required courses to get my Bachelors.

Try and find out. Only way you will learn.

Are you talking about the program seen at 3:00? That's IDA Pro, which costs a hefty amount of money for a license. People who don't have that kind of cash use Ghidra, ollydbg, Radare2, and so on, but I've heard many accounts of IDA Pro being the king of disassemblers.

You gotta be more specific. Not every game tries to detect cheats in the same way nor do all cheats operate in the same way.

Offsets of the memory are still the same if memory is allocated statically instead of dynamically

Addresses are always different, but for e.g player and player health are related cuz player is class and player health is variable of that player class so if code does not change offset will always be same.

@@catalinnedelescu Mhmm that's how dynamic memory allocation works although it would prevent the offset hack there's still many other ways to find it in memory

Not unless they have completely rewritten and transformed the Class structure or moved the health attributes to another Class in some weird refactoring project that I've never heard anyone do before. But to answer your question, even if the memory is compartmentalized into smaller blocks spread throughout the memory map, that's what pointers are designed to do: tell the interpreter where that memory block is. More specifically, it tells you where the BEGINNING of that chunk of memory is for that piece of data, and then you would have your offsets to access the different attributes of that structure. If you're learning any kind of programming language, I heavily recommend playing around with iterators for vectors or other containers. That will give you a better idea of what is happening, as the iterator is literally just an "offset" of the destination of a pointer. In C++, if you declare "auto itr = myVector.begin()", your offset is 1 position (which is 1 byte or 4 bytes? I don't remember) because your iterator is at the first item in your vector. If you do "itr += 1", your offset is now 2, so you're at the 2nd item in your vector. I don't believe C++ will allow you to do it, but if you were to somehow move back 1 position from "myVector.begin()", you would still be in the memory region that contains the vector because the bytes that come before the actual list of items is some code that basically says "this is the START of a vector of size X"; because we have something detailing the length of the vector, we don't need bytes at the end of the object saying "this is the END of the vector", it will instead be random memory used by who-knows-what. Anyone please correct me if I'm wrong on anything, it's been ages since I've coded in C++, but I'm pretty certain this is accurate.

I wouldn’t say it’s a “huge” part, but for sure it plays a part. It’s another vector to cheat in for sure. Also something I’m not experienced with unfortunately. Have a good one G 👌👍

👀 my bad

Player positions is easy, it's just about assumptions and using other search methods instead of "Exact value". There are tutorials online on how to find unknown values using "increased", "decreased" as comparison metrics. About the grid in memory, there probably is a sort of array for all the positions for all the candies on your screen, you have to find that structure and then reverse the way it's built and used. I don't know how Candy Crush works but a good starting point would be to use your points to reverse all the way back to the function that calculated your move as valid, that one definitely receives the grid array somehow, you can go from there.

I feel like the same is happening to me. Could you tell me about your journey of getting into cybersecurity?

*while manually checking if the health changed, because i don‘t know the offset to check it automatically*

That's a lot of work when you can just change some values in memory, but yeah there are hacked executables that automatically inject .dlls on startup, but it's pretty rare these days. It's way easier to create a trainer.

Dont bro, Whatever you do you will get ban, Some game might get you ip ban Ip ban isnt a regular ban So dont do it, like srsly as a game dev pls dont ruin other peoples experience

@@ShinAkiru there are many ways to ban a computer but not through IP. If any game developer would ever ban for IP that would get messy pretty quickly

Getting ipbanned si so lame you just need a new ip LOL

@@ferret3998Yea game devs should start banning the windows registry and the user

lol that level of hacking is very deep

@@tiqosc1809 yes true but its the most useful one

The basic problem is computing power. How much of your game should the server run vs client run. Like with what you said the server should know the health. But you can say “I deal 1000 damage”

@@matthewread9001 I'm not sure what the server is doing then, is it just a proxy? Anyways, my computer should also know the rules of the game. If anybody sent a signal of a ridiculous damage, shouldn't my computer refuse because she understands the rules too?, the game even knows which weapon caused that damage!