@@tabigill6167 Watch his video that he mentioned in the last of this video where he told how to make topical maps and cover them and become a topical authority.
@@MattDiggity Matt, I love this video and have been applying it to a few pages after the HCU. I checked this reply of yours, watched the video, and it could be the most impactful content I've ever come across. Thank you for sharing this Obvious To You video. I'm going to rewatch it over and over, just like this ChatGPT video of yours.
Hope this helps. "Please start by reading this document, [insert document URL here]." "ChatGPT, read my article here [insert URL]. Then compare my article with these three that rank higher for the keyword, [insert keyword]." "Based strictly on the guidelines or principles outlined in the first document, analyze these articles and compare them in terms of the depth and detail of the content, the demonstration of expertise and credibility, and how well they fulfill the user's intent." "Provide a list of specific action points for improvements that could potentially enhance the ranking of my article strictly based on areas where you verified through the text that the other articles are performing better." "Please exclude any generic SEO advice. I only want action points based on where these articles are outperforming mine."
Hello Matt, what software would you recommend for writing category descriptions, product descriptions for e-commerce? I'm having really hard time finding something decent in terms of results. Thank you for the help.@@MattDiggity
Took about 30 minutes to run through this myself, but it worked great! The prompt gave me a breakdown of each site I asked it to compare, broken down by "Content", and "Action Point". It also did a great job on the Comparative Analysis by providing specific notes about Depth and Detail, Expertise and Credibility, and Unique Selling Points of my content compared to my competitors. The most useful area for me was the breakdown of the "Action Points Based on the Comparison" at the end of the output. This gave me a complete breakdown of the steps I can take to outrank the competitor pages I listed. **make sure you save the chat so you can re-use it for future comparisons and avoid having to retrain it. Excellent walk-thru Matt. High value and easy to follow!
Hm, I like the concepts here, but given the current context window of GPT-4 (which is around 6000-8000 words including prompts and replies) - it’s not possible for ChatGPT to retain the entire quality evaluator guidelines, the competitor content and your content in a single session. It’s more likely that GPT is responding to your subsequent prompts without the full context you’ve provided. This will be overcome when larger context models are more commercially viable/accessible but something to consider.
@@speakingscripts It's not a matter of message limits in the chat interface, it's an issue related to how much text the model can consider at once. The model has a fixed context window of around 6000-8000 tokens. This is a hard limit on how much information it can consider in generating a response, regardless of how the text is uploaded. Uploading a PDF wouldn't circumvent this constraint; the model would still truncate or lose earlier portions of the text as it reaches its token limit. So the fundamental issue remains.
In fact you don't need it to read the PDF at all, whilst it may not have the latest version you can just tell it "Based on Google's Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines analyze my page here...". The guidelines are freely available on the web and GPT would have almost certainly have this in it's training. I have tested it and it works just as well.
Woah, thanks for this Matt. I've been trying to train ChatGPT to give me better results for my prompts when I handed it Google's guidelines. I'm going to give this a shot.
I have re-engineered your prompt: Initial Setup: Begin by accessing and reviewing the foundational document located at: [insert document url here]. This document establishes the criteria and guidelines essential for our analysis. Step 1: Familiarize yourself with the content and objectives outlined in my article, available here: [insert article URL]. Note the key themes, arguments, and evidence presented. Step 2: Proceed to examine the three articles that are more prominently ranked for the specified keyword [insert keyword here]. These articles can be found at the following URLs: Article 1: [URL] Article 2: [URL] Article 3: [URL] Analytical Framework: Content Depth and Detail: Compare each article against the depth and detail found in the foundational document. Which articles provide the most thorough exploration of the topic? Expertise and Credibility: Assess the demonstration of expertise and credibility in each article. How well do they align with the guidelines for establishing authority and trustworthiness? User Intent Fulfillment: Evaluate how effectively each article meets the user's intent based on the criteria set forth in the foundational document. Consider the clarity of purpose, audience engagement, and the value provided to the reader. Comparative Analysis: Utilize the guidelines from the foundational document as your benchmark. Your analysis should exclusively focus on these criteria to maintain consistency and relevance in our evaluation. Conclusion: Summarize your findings, highlighting the comparative strengths and areas for improvement in my content relative to the other articles. This analysis should inform potential enhancements to align more closely with the quality rater guidelines and better fulfill user intent. Instructions for Enhanced Clarity: Maintain a structured approach by addressing each analytical aspect sequentially. Use specific examples from the articles to support your comparisons. Provide clear, actionable feedback that can be directly applied to improve the content.
@@realWorsin You sir are a tool. This guy gave you a lot of very useful tips, and this is your response. If you would use your two braincells, you can see the URL as he is feeding it into the PDF plugin. You can literally screenshot and have GPT give you the URL(exactly what I did and I am reading through the guidelines right now). Shame on you.
Found your post interesting to watch. I can't wait to see your new videos soon. Good Luck with the upcoming update. This RU-vid channel is really very informative and effective.
Hey there, thanks for the videos! I tried to join the F group but have not been approved in a week even thought I answered the questions. Any suggestions?
When I try to load the PDF I keep getting an error saying the PDF is over 100 pages, I've even cut the PDF in half (under 100 pages) and still getting the same error. ANyone else had this? Great video Matt, looking forward to trying this
I had a lot of trouble running this during the day. I am assuming this is process intensive so that might be why.. late at night it works almost every time.
Once you train Chat Gpt on the documentation, is there a way to save that training for future use so you can just deploy it rather than having to start at step one again with training for the next keyword you want to evaluate?
quick beginner question... what is better to rank a blog post... work with a powerful ChatGPT 4 like Matt showed in this video OR work with a SEO tool like Surfer? Thanks and you rock @MattDiggity
Thanks a lot. Just one more question. Of course use AI writer inside surfer in good. But just the tool using the editor is enough to create nice blog post and try to rank? I mean, is it essential use the AI?
@MattDiggity Thank you for the great content once again. I have a big question. I want to go link fishing and use a statistics piece as bait. As this is the first time I am publishing a pure statistics piece, do I have to publish it as a page or as a post?
i'm trying this now and im having issues with the read your pdf plugin. i know chat gpt is going through some updates this week and its been acting up but the readyourpdf plugin says it can only ready 100 pages and the google doc is 176 pages.. anyone facing a similar issue?
Hey Mat, do you have any tips for implementing topical authority in a simple way? I have been making an effort to understand it, but it is proving to be quite challenging.
I don't understand how you can feed GPT such a large document and have it actually remember it all. As far as I know this is way outside GPT's current capabilities.
And you need to use a plugin that allows it to read pdfs. When I tested Matt's prompt, it was able to stay on point. I also asked it a bunch of follow-up questions, and it gave me useful info.
WriteSonic is good but not great. Unless you pay for SurferSEO which connects to WriteSonic easily. And then, yes, WriteSonic has "Chat"Sonic which is basically ChatGPT at WriteSonic prices. The only way to get something better than WriteSonic is to hire one of these vloggers who are experts at doing all of this stuff you just now watched on a vlog. There are WriteSonic alternatives, some are worse, some are better, usually dependent on the price. I love what this vlogger said however, about the fact that you only need to be better than the previous vlogger/blogger who ranked at the top of the SERP. Outdo that article/video and you're now at #1 which means you don't need a perfect or awesome article/video, just do better than the previous person at the top of the SERP. Outstanding thought!
