How is France on its Fifth Republic? (Short Animated Documentary) 

Technically, the Fifth Republic is more of a PR stunt. When countries change the constitution, nobody typically considers them to be brand new entities as long as the form of government remains republican. Hungary had a new constitution in 2011 and they even removed "Republic of..." from its name but does Wikipedia display what followed the People's Republic of Hungary as anything other than just modern Hungary? No.

yarpen26 No the fifth republic was proclaimed because Vichy France was the fourth republic as all the politicians who were elected before WW2 supported it.

@@LEGOSHADOWSPARTAN vichy france wasn't the forth republic. The forth republique was from 1944-45 (depends if you count the "gouvernement provisoire) to 1958. Vichy france had not any official name to qualify herself, but it was more or less a faciste dictatorship that was a puppet state of germany

@@nirdec Sorry I mistook the 3rd Republic for the 4th. In my defense the French have had so many republics that it's an easy mistake to make.

@@LEGOSHADOWSPARTAN The 3rd Republic was before WW2. Vichy was the "French State".

we gotta pump those likes up those are rookie likes!!

Ngl, that one was great

Can someone explain please?

Shooter King it’s a Patreon backer of his.

@@anamationmax oh yeah 😂😂😂

Lmfao

He did hate America

it’s true

I understood that reference.

@@Wenving Weird, considering it was the UK that constantly defended France from America (They wanted to treat France as an enemy state, due to Petain, and wanted to take away French Indochina. Britain persuaded America to see them as a Liberated Nation, instead, and wanted to let them keep Indochina).

Yes but... the 5th republic is called a perpetual coup d'État since it gives too much power to the président. So he kinda really grabbed power for himself until we kicked him out in 68

impressive when you think about it. The bloke ruled using referendum where he basically said "trust me the thing is necessary" and one time the people voted no, he just left power. The people didn't trust him anymore so he left, that's amazing

@@JohnDoe____ really a great statesman. I fear though, he is a bit like Bismarck, in the sense, that he tailored the institutions to him, and they don't really work once he left.

As a french, I can say that while De Gaulle did a lot to get France out of the crisis, and was certainly sincerly thinking he did the best for France, I can say that the institutions he made mostly by himself (remember, Jacque Chirac made some slight change to reinforce the president's power) are not suited at all for the needs of today.

​​@@JohnDoe____efore the referendum he basically said "Alright so I'm getting tired of all of this so if you don't agree with me say so and I'm leaving"

Nice one ! XD

@@pitioti Thanks!

Zing

Omfg xD

A brit making fun of the french never gets old.

In Polish we have 3 words for ,,coup": - _pucz_ - _zamach stanu_ - _przewrót_ So that also should give you some idea😀

@@Admiral45-10 We use putsch to describe unsuccessful coups in France.

@@reds.victim1023 in Poland we use that second one to fully describe what happened (e.c. ,,Przewrót Majowy był zamachem stanu"), and that second one if it already has a description (e.c. ,,Przewrót na Rzym" (in 1919 Italy), or ,,Przewrót Majowy" (in 1926 Poland))

Well to be fair as France was lingua franca for centuries then it isn't a wonder that lots of words concerning military, diplomacy, politics, culture, etiquette etc. are French in origin. Just like many words about technology are derived from English these days.

@@Pikkabuu Sure, but that is not a funny explanation. @All As for something else that"s not funny... the word "Putsch" comes from Switzerland (allemanic German) and was exported elsewhere only in the 19th c., when that putsch thing became popular with civil governments... Can"t help but notice, that this is the most French-influenced German language region besides Elsass-Lothringen and Luxemburg.

"And you know what? We may get closer but we still dont really know the answer, so we think of mayyybe getting a 6th one at some point."

@@erwannthietart3602 It's only a matter of time. Although given the current political climate a new constitution would probably give even MORE power to the president rather than less. Macron, Le Pen, Mélenchon and whoever Les Républicains may pick as their next candidate... They would all very much like to rule with absolute power.

With some, uh… _mild_ *cough* catastrophic *cough* military defeats sprinkled in between.

​@@erwannthietart3602 You're closer to the truth than you may think. I'm French. The Vth Republic is the handiwork of General De Gaulle. It was tailored for his style of leadership in a time of crisis. As such the president has a surprising amount of actual power in comparison to other world leaders over the own states. The issue is it is a crisis-era constitution made for one purpose - dealing with issues fast and efficiently when you don't have the time to really consult and come to an agreement with all the players that should have a hand in the decision process. Until the Covid that felt outdated. In Covid it shone as extremely efficient at dealing with the situation. There was just one problem. The president himself wasn't up to it. Political opinions of the man not withstanding, he had the power to enforce all the measures he needed - yet at every turn was indecisive. I probably would have been too in his place, but the point of the comment is to highlight - when you give the executive that much power you need someone to actually use it without agonizing over it. Otherwise it's no use. Now of course, many on the political scene fancy themselves heirs to General De Gaulle. They all want to take a shot at it and be the second coming of the general. While a strong leader like De Gaulle is what the country needs currently there are none of the current candidates have the mettle for it, but they all want to get the president to have even more powers than the constitution already allows. Which would involve key changes in the constitution itself, which has already been revised several times under the fifth, but never in a significant enough manner to actually say "This is a whole new document - here's your Sixth Republic". Actually, most of the changes to the constitution have been made after De Gaulle's departure, and were aimed at diminishing the president's executive powers. But even today the president still retains the ability to override much of what the senate, the national assembly, the government do. But it is not done routinely because ... French are always pissed ... and openly overruling a decision by presidential authority would have a bunch of angry French out in the streets with banners saying "Down with the Dictator, viva la Revolution." And I'm not even exaggerating that much on that final point.

That's just a dysfonctionnal regime, the two options are bad, that's not tests but fails.

I don't speak French, but isn't it supposed to be "La Constitution"?

@@Hand-in-Shot_Productions yes

@@Hand-in-Shot_Productions and that's the intention of the joke I think

"After three years, the sitting president shouldn't launch a coup to retain power. That would be uncool..."

Having gendered definite articles in a language is stupid and should be phased out.

Why are you here? Why do I keep seeing you? I MUST KNOW WHY YOU HANDSOME THICC BOI.

to be fair, an AA cannon is a _lot_ more fun to use than a guillotine, so you win on that front

To the guillotine!

@@XxMrLimeyxX admiring another person, to the guillotine!

King and Danton didnt jump from the window thinking itll save them

I don't think he knows about fifth republic's Pippin.

What about elevenses? Luncheon?

Completly unknown, but Charles De Gaulle offered the count of Paris (the descendent of the Bourbon family) the throne of France if he was ever to be in power. But when he actually got into power, he kept the power for himself. Doesn't change the fact that in french modern history De Gaulle was probably the best leader we ever had, but funny to see how greed and politics can interact

Where’s sixth French Republic coming up

@@fatiazizi8825 Probably after the belgian invasion, the quick resistance movement and the takeover of Belgium AND France by glorious Luxemburg!

And after the third it should only happen as a defense from a foreign power

Not sure we can say that the first crusade was a great success knowing that only 5% of the initial Christian force managed to reach Jerusalem alive

A lot of addictions are the same way

Except if it is to then immediately spend it on something - if it is just fiscal consolidation the French people : a la volonte du peuple ...

Which is ironic as I'm pretty sure they're the first or second highest taxed country in the world.

@@matthewslavin1498 source?

@@user-eb6vc2gs9e Cottereau, RU-vid.

@@user-eb6vc2gs9e listed on Wikipedia as the highest by tax revenue to GDP.

He is from the year 2067

I'm sure the French wouldn't be confused with that outcome

@@Ba-gb4br I think the year 2222 is more appropriate.

@@alexander-mauricemillamlae4567 More bold to assume there will be another 47 years

@@MrRiddle0 bold of you to assume that 47 years is an adequate form of measuring time

Vas voir l'Italie tu vas être surpris

Si seulement :-(

@@eugenekali6704 mais on a fabriquer l'Italie moderne en 1918

some French want a 6th republic.

Paul Amblard is this a french wide thing or is it just Paris being Paris

Don’t forget republics and empires.

Take my like

"It can go from one regime to another in just under 3 days"

To be fair, the Ancien regime saw three different dynasties and a number of civil wars (including the wars of religion and peasant risings).

@@peterspanov yes but as did most european monarchies, the longevity of a dynasty is obviouly the goal but it almost never perfectly happen. so yeah, keeping the same regime in place for almost 1000y is impressive, the change of dynasties is part of the game.

@@jenniferr9144 if we consider the change from the 4th to 5th republic, then plenty of the dynastic changes should count too.

@@peterspanov but in a sense the shift from 4th to 5th was also quite large in the sense the forms of power completely changed. In the 4th republic the president was basically just a mascot for the country and all of the power was held in the parliament. The 5th republic changed that : the president is the one to decide the laws, the parliament can only agree or disagree. The president also became the de facto leader of the military, and can overwrite some of the parliament decisions (for exemple he can pass 2 laws per year without the parliament consent), and dissolve the assembly. The power shift was massive enough I think it deserves to be called a new republic.

@@vizender Absolutely, but it remained a republic. I was drawing an analogy to the massive changes that did occur during the "Ancien Regime"

He's just saw how they were ahead of their time.

@@kassaran2092 Was that pun with (a)head intended?

@@gundhamtanaka8725 Well, moreover without the head post-revolution. Had to cut the joke short-

@@kassaran2092 A-Head of their time, isn't ist ?

To be fair the guillotine was only removed alongside death penalty in the mid 1980’s , it knew all the republics

Basically, France is the very hungry caterpillar of Europe, to put it mildly - MILDLY.

sounds like a fun life lol

Dustman00 At least he still had some Crepes and Baguettes along the way.......

Dustman00 When did you get in the habit of spelling “another” as “an other”? One time is a typo, 3 times? It’s you.

At that age, he was probably the oldest man on Earth

But hey,i said i want monarchy!!1!1!

@Mr. Icyfire Not funny, didnt laugh

"I thought we wanted an anarcho-marxist commune?" "NOBODY WANTS THAT!" *Murders everyone*

"Why cant you just be normal like your friend England? They have the same government system for 330 years!" France "Fuck those whinies, VIVE LA RÉVOLUCION!"

Alright you chose, British parliamentarian system for your government France: WTF

Turkey : Allow me to introduce myself

Also Turkey: *Not this time bud*

*Thailand has joined the chat*

The only military coup d’Etat occurred in 1799 when the general Bonaparte took the power. In 1958 the army didn’t take the power.

@@marcmarc8524 1. A country is on the brink of disaster because politicians refuse to take responsibility. 2. Seeing the situation, the military demands that politicians act. The army is threatening a coup. 3. Politicians are forced to agree to take action and put in place a temporary regime. 4. At the head of this regime is a politician (former general) who imposes reforms. It's true, reforms were requested a few years earlier by one of the most democratic politicians in office (the one who concluded the Indochina war). However, even if it did not formally take power, the army did impose reforms. It is fortunate for France that its soldiers were Democrats in 1958.

Thank you for your comment! Your English is great!

Is it still that way today?

@@brandonlyon730 as a french man, yes. Expect a revolt in a few years.

Somehow you’re forgetting Italian politics! Now THERE is a real dumpster fire...

@@samiam619 clearly never been to the UK lol

To be fair that is all true of most long lasting nations. Look a China, that is an almost 5 thousand year of breaking up and reforming messy does not begin to describe it.

The first the second the third the fourth and the Fifth where we currently are. Some politician wants to create the sixth but we're not here yet.

Kingdom of France (mega --gay-- cringe) **R e v o l u t i o n** First French Republic - la terreur (big scary) - directory **N a p o l e o n** First French Empire Bourbon Restoration - July Monarchy Second French Republic Second French Empire Third French Republic **W o r l d W a r I I** Vichy France/Free France Fourth French Republic Fifth French Republic How'd I do?

@@concept5631 Not bad o.o

@@Obi1Classic Nice.

@@NicolasMendoula *_Yet._*

*TO THE GUILLOTINE!!!*

@@aleksandarvil5718 Isnt there a tax for that

@@thebandit0256 TO THE GUILLOTINE!

Justin Higner I know

I LOL'd at that one.

France only finds it pathetic because the car wheels don't have a republic between each revolution.

You actually made me laugh, you absolute madman!

It's a bit different. French Revolutionaries and Bonapartistes have a love hate relationship with each other the French Empire is more like if Yoda were deposed and the Jedi order disbanded but many of its former members served the Empire much as they had done before.

@Anglozion 76 Who is James Bisonet? He's his oldest patron if I'm right

@Anglozion 76 I know that, but where did he come from?

@@vexxfulomega9 He is a Time Lord, but unlike the Doctor, he focuses solely on donating to this channel instead of travelling the universe.

Maximilien Robespierre: "This is where the fun begins"

All the guillotining

Or the revolt country, but some of us shitposters call it that anyway.

Time traveler: "I'm from the future, is France still revolting?" Brit: "Yes. Always."

@@stanleyrogouski well, it's been awhile since France's last revolt- grab your pitchforks I guess?

@@stanleyrogouski Wasn't that what Paris has been since Napolron III...

@@stanleyrogouski You've never been to the suburbs of Paris.

As a french, no we love riot and chaos for no reason

@@imtolazyto az a French, no oui love riote an l’chaos for no reazone

"Is five a lot ?" "Depends on what. Wines and cheeses ? no. Republics ? Yes"

"How can one man rule a country with hundreds of different kinds of cheese?" ~ Charles de Gaulle

it's more thousand

Technically the franks aren't the same as France, they were France's ancestors, and maybe Germany. I'm hesitating between the franks and the Carolingiens, but one of them had the territory of today Germany or maybe both.

@@Isokatmydydecsf it's a joke....

@@Isokatmydydecsf Carolingiens are Franks though, that's the funny bit about your comment. They're a Frankish dynasty.

@@11Survivor aaahh yes it's the same, thank you, and my bad for my mistakes.

@@Isokatmydydecsf Also, France's currency when it had its own currency was the frank.

Then they put the old king back on the throne after the Bonaparte gets defeated. 😂

@@thegamingenderman198 They actually did try to get a Bourbon back on the throne after Napoleon III was ousted . Of course all of this fell apart when he refused the throne unless the tricolor flag was changed back to the white bourbon one . In the end they settled on a republic since it was" the form of government that divides France least".

I think French voted for Louis-Napoleon cuz they wanted a revenge.

*Napoleon III is declared Emperor* Europe: ANOTHER ONE?!

@@runninglama1954 And to an extent, they got it! The French under Napoleon III drove back Russia, severely weakened Austria, unified Italy among other stuff. Ironically, the one power he didn't anger and made peace with was Britain!

Francestan

France: "The monarchy sucks, so let's build a republic!" France: "The republic sucks, so let's build an empire!" The world: "Your empire sucks, go back to being a monarchy." France: "The monarchy sucks, so let's build a republic!"

@@Kylora2112 lol

@Spartan 506 People's imperial republic of the kingdom of France

Normie

Francestan

Some politicians wants a 6th Republic indeed

The final form is when we'll rule the galaxy but my spy said it was in a very long time.

The final from is FLAC

To be fair, he did win a few wars before this one against Austria and Russia so he had reasons to be confident

Kim Ok he wasn’t, he knew the french military was not prepared and he was dying of kidney failure, however despite being leader of all armies he had no choice since only the parliament could decide whether to declare war or not.

Also Bismarck: The attempt on my life has not left me scarred and deformed. I laugh at you silly assassin, I am iron chancellor.

@@firstconsul7286 *Puts on shades and walks away*

@@firstconsul7286 I will show show the true nature of the Rhine.

Actualy french are like ruled by a "Rian Johnson", if you see what I mean...

Oh god oh shit

😂😂😂

Return of the emperor

episode 6: return of the panzers

Why can't the latins govern efficiently

@@stanleyrogouski you aren't very familiar with roman history, are you?

;)

@@stanleyrogouski Uhh....

@@cageybee7221 Byzantine

they got 6 republics within 40 years

Brazil had 3 republics, one monarchy, one fascist dictatorship and one military dictatorship in a span of 198 years.. and in average 1 constitution for each such regime.. just a hack of an unstable country..

@@loopingpong1412 and what of the Vargas dictatorship between the first and the second republic? and the military dictatorship between the second and the current one?

@@bumblebeeeoptimus Meanwhile Louisiana is on its 11th constitution

Philippines, which had 5 republics in 100 years: *am I a joke to you?*

That's true, and just look at the USA, which hasn't had any changes to our government in over 200 years. Which country is doing better? France or the USA?

@@tachy1801 But... I'm an american... And I'm not upset... A lot of us don't like the US government.

@@japanpanda2179 Americans have more rights than french since their constitutions isn't changed like toilet paper and they are much less forced to follow Washington than french have to follow Paris. There is no such thing as a first or second amendment in France (or in the rest of Europe in fact). The Vth republic is very close to what the french monarchy was with strong presidential powers and a weak parliament, we just elect a new king every 5 years.

@@Okxyd There's such a thing as having too much freedom, of being too decentralized. The marijuana laws in the USA are proof enough of that.

@@japanpanda2179 One lost a colonial empire. The other went from a small nation of country powers to the world hegemon in 175 years. Which one is doing better, you tell me?

Justement je suis en première et avec le nouveau programme, notre année était uniquement à propos du XIXeme siècle (on a commencé avec Napoléon jusqu'à la 1ère guerre mondiale.. En passant par la colonisation !)

@@lulena7774 Ok cool ça ! Je pense qu'il y a beaucoup à apprendre de la période en effet

L'éducation nationale est tellement inégale. En 5 ans de collège j'ai eut UN SEUL cours sur Napoléon et c'était un ramassis de conneries ( on a utilisé un tracte de propagande espagnole; qui le comparait à Satan, pour montrer quel horrible dictateur il était 🙄). D'un autre côté, j'ai beaucoup étudié les 2 guerres d'indépendance. Donc ça varie vraiment beaucoup.

God dammit Poland this was the one time for you to be part of a dominating alliance and you blew it

@@thedarkholegammertdhg9255 blame French for getting too cocky, we just went with their wave. (Besides Napoleon never cared about Poland anyway)

@@TheBard1999 No true Napoleon was a great ally to the polish and gave them their state back for a short time.

@@thedarkholegammertdhg9255 it was more complicated. Allow me to explain. There was a misunderstanding in the begging - formally this state was called ,,Duchy of Warsaw", but everyone didn't care and was calling it ,,Poland" (like with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwelth, which may be ,,ouch" for Lithuanians). Formally, we were in personal union with Brandenburg, but - according to _III May Constitution_ - it was legal. One of its point was, that the ancestor of Polish-Lithuanian throne should be the grandson of Stanisław August Poniatowski - Frederick Augustus, who was now ruling the Brandenburg, as Polish-Lithuanian Commonwelth was dead by 1795. Napoleon I Bonaparte arrived at Polish lands in 1803, proclaiming ,,Duchy of Warsaw", allowing it to write its own Constitution. It was formally a French Vassal state (only point there Napoleon wanted to be), but he didn't really care. It was pretty autonomous, and from Polish (I'm not sure if from Lithuanian) perspective it looked like liberation - he defeated Prussia and Austria, occupying our country, and forced Russia to withdraw too. That's also a reason, why Napoleon is a hero in Poland. As Napoleonic Allie, we joined his war with Austria in 1809. This victory, sometimes called ,,Smartest victory of Polish people", made us get back everything Austria took from I and III Partition of Poland (in 1772 and 1795). Its fall was more complex - you see, Russian campaign didn't turn out to be that easy, and in 1813 he needed to retreat. He retreated to Poland, hoping it would help him, but Russian Army was stronger and defeated him. This way Poland got occupied by Russia, Prussia and Austria again, and that would last until November 1918.

Basically, Poland lost its independence back in 1795 to our three neighbours and Napoleon freed us from them

It's a good joke, a bit overused in his videos though.

"But I'm better now!" "No, you're still dead." "I'm better! Really! It was only a mild case!" "We're not doing this again! You're dead!" "Fine, be that way."

the english did invent decapitation of king though. It was their idea.

All four of them very mediocre, unfortunately

I hope they bring back guilliotine in the 5th sequel.

@@tachy1801 Big *O O F* to that reference xD

@@tachy1801 A certain medieval fantasy series whose 8th season was devoid of logic.

I found a comment from avery the cuban american

Francestan

قرآن میرا ٹوائلٹ پیپر ہے shut up kid

Just like how china is a r e p u b l i c

I am French and I agree

If it makes you feel better, they were still lopping off heads into the 50s or 60s.

skeeter honey The last one happened when Star Wars still existed

But why couldn't France just copy the US Government style of a republic with 3 equal branches of government?

Attie Pollard We French are complicated.

Francestan

@@user-rx9fj2jl6n You must be hella bored

T'as vu 😎

South Korea

Well yes, but I think it's time to stop adding amendments and maybe actually put them into the the print itself.

@@Toonrick12 What's the point? They're legally binding, anyway. It's fine the way it is

You seem to have missed the Confederacy War of Independence (some call it the US Civil War, but it was fuoght for the same reasons as the previous one), and 600,000 dead from that. Hurray for a ‘successful’ constitution. Oh, and the slaves, the Indians, and the Mexican founded states, would like their freedoms back…

@@lonerganravenfunerals3886 You know the civil war didn't happen for any reason provided by the Constitution, right? And that slavery was abolished through the Constitution, right? Do you even know what you're talking about? The point stands that the US is the first successful large republic in history. So yes, I'd say that the Constitution was very well thought-out, and was written by people who very much knew what they were doing

@@lonerganravenfunerals3886 Also, the civil war was not fought for the same reasons as the previous one. The Confederacy seceded on a suspicion. The circumstances were entirely different.

To be fair to De Gaulle, any dictator willing to do a job then step down voluntarily within six months deserves at least a modicum of praise.

Depressed lonly 19 year old doomer zoomer No worry about that : we learn the same thing as you. Our president said it : 'colonization was a crime against humanity'. About the coup, I remember the 'putsh' in Algeria, later, but not this one. 🤔

@Depressed lonly 19 year old doomer zoomer Which country are you from? Unlike what you're thinking, we in fact do learn about the crimes that were committed

@Depressed lonly 19 year old doomer zoomer Most nations have a history of beastly behaviour to others, and those that don't were not peace loving hippies but simply less successful at being gits. What is now Algeria was a source of piracy and slave raids on the coasts of Europe for centuries, not to mention military incursions as far north as Tours. You may look back on the past few centuries and see tragedy, but the French of a few centuries ago could do the same, and round and round we go in a never ending cycle of tit for tat. It was and is a dog eat dog world and the fact that we have partially succeeded in restraining our tendency to fight should be celebrated and the backbiting kept to a minimum, it only riles everyone up and we don't want to slide back into bad habits.

@Depressed lonly 19 year old doomer zoomer well of course I know it, the same thing happened in the pacific ocean.

He only does videos on white people and upperland asians

@@makutas-v261 lmfao

who asks you?

You seem to make a distinction between the nature of Spain's colonial hegemony and that of the US. What was the difference, as you see it?

South Korea had 6th Republics :P

;=)

'Good' one is debatable, sometimes it's pretty much a glorified constitutional monarchy, and there are some parties calling for the writing of a 6th constitution, for good reasons in my mind

@@samarkand1585 Tell me more, please

Well the Fifth Republic may come into an end because the President gets too many powers. There's for example article 49:3 which basically allows the Prime Minister (which is a President puppet) to get a law passed without the Parlement voting. This Republic isn't perfect, there can be instability, as the government will rule the way the Parlement gets the majority. So if there's a left majority, the government will rule left to get its law voted. But while President Hollande (2012-2017), he got a majority in the parlement. But, for some reasons, a part of his majority became "frondeurs" (they basically stopped voting for his laws), resulting in a total absence of majority in the Parlement. So no laws could pass efficiently, and the Article 49:3 (which isn't *that* democratic) has been spamed. I hope I made myself clear in some problems this Republic has. There are other ones but this is the most relevant to me.

@@bobing1752 Article 49-3 is a bit more complicated, because then the opposition can ask for a motion of censure against the government. But since the majority in parliament isn't stupid enough to torpedoed its own government.

There are no good republics

France: We had 2 empires and Brazil you only had 1 empire.

Instead we have the *coq* which is way funnier

*Unlimited POWER*

,,In order to ensure our security and continuing stability, The _People's Poland_ will be reorganized, Into the *Polish People's Commonwelth!* For safe and secure society!" - Władysław Gomułka, 1952

;=)

"In order to ensure our security and continuing stability, the Third Philippine Republic will be reorganized into the Fourth Phillippine Republic for a safe and secure society." - President Ferdinand E. Marcos

@@subbyplayz6332 ;)

Underrated comment

Napoleon VI = OG sonic

All jokes aside, Napoléon III has been done dirty in public opinion, partly because of Victor Hugo dissing him 24/7, partly because his reign ended in a shamefull defeat. While he was no military genius like his uncle, he was a very smart and cunning politician with a clear vision for his country, he lead France on the path of technological, social and even urbanistic modernity. He tightened the diplomatic bond with Great Britain that would prove essential during the XXth century. Tho he is not as revered as his warlike counterpart, one could argue that he did way more in the way of building France as a modern country.

@Netherlands Cassava True, tho to be fair that last war with Prussia was kinda forced by the French people wanting war. Then again, to be fair good old Chancellor Bismarck goaded France into that war too...

Francestan

Every poor bastard in charge at the moment: *Ah shit here we go again*

@@user-rx9fj2jl6n Revolutistan

France France Revolution

Original comment

The monarchy was removed through a "referendum"

Vote remove or be shot

One of their princes ended up in England

Don't know what this is referencing, but I'm liking it anyway

Soon

2020, probably

If Mélanchon gets elected he promised a 6th republic. He was third last election.

Francestan

There's a politician in france that wants to proclaim the 6th republic if he gets elected for some reason 🤷‍♀️

The Republic of Korea has had 6 Republics

Brazil has also had 6 republics.

@@baelonthebrave5474 *South Korea There's 2 Koreas.

@@baelonthebrave5474 You should have also said that it is not the Democratic Republic of Korea. AKA:North Korea.

@@archmelee South Korea's official name is "The Republic of Korea". Only an idiot would assume he's talking about North Korea.

Francestan

That was a horrible combination of memes. Keep up the good work

@@jackrabbit4545 Thanks, I'll do so. :)

Laughs in Sudan

Democrats: I would like one, for voting rights and constitution. Marxists: two would be nice, for wealth equality and to kill all bourgeoisie. France: yesss

not by Lincoln, it was a quote ABOUT Lincoln

And this has never shown anyone's good character.

@@barley12girl Lincoln, Huey Long, Charles de Guille, Lázaro Cárdenas... Should I keep going?

@@cynicat74 not Lincoln's

@@user-eb6vc2gs9e Go cry about "them mexicans" in your Trump hat some more, traitor.

Oh god please nooooo

What's crazy to think about is that if Napoleon I or Napoleon III didn't get overly ambitious, France might still have an emperor at least as a constitutional monarchy (Napoleon III surprisingly got along really well with Queen Victoria and many in the British government).