Тёмный

How Japan is dumping 1m tonnes of radioactive water in the ocean | It's Complicated 

The Guardian
Подписаться 2,3 млн
Просмотров 275 тыс.
50% 1

Since the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, more than 1m tonnes of radioactive water has been building up at the power plant in central Japan. Soon the plant will run out of space to store the water, which is a big problem. The plan at the moment is to dump it all in the sea. So how do you go about making 1m tonnes of radioactive water, safe to drink?
Subscribe to The Guardian on RU-vid ► is.gd/subscribeguardian
The Guardian publishes independent journalism, made possible by supporters. Contribute to The Guardian today ► bit.ly/3biVfwh
Website ► www.theguardian.com
Facebook ► / theguardian
Twitter ► / guardian
Instagram ► / guardian
#fukushima #nuclear #japantsunami #radioactive

Опубликовано:

 

15 сен 2021

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,8 тыс.   
@AlexLin-xv2hi
@AlexLin-xv2hi 11 месяцев назад
The ocean is not Japan's backyard It's the home we share
@user-ht1il8ji8z
@user-ht1il8ji8z 11 месяцев назад
Japanese government said that They are going to discharge these nuclear sewage today.
@daisbugz
@daisbugz 11 месяцев назад
@@user-ht1il8ji8zYES JUST NOW
@RaspiestLY
@RaspiestLY 11 месяцев назад
​@@user-ht1il8ji8zJapan is the sinner of the world
@Lee-vb6ib
@Lee-vb6ib 11 месяцев назад
@@user-ht1il8ji8zJapan has never been changed, evil to the end.
@anntan9509
@anntan9509 11 месяцев назад
@@user-ht1il8ji8zIt's already started
@michaeldoesfunstuff4992
@michaeldoesfunstuff4992 Год назад
If the water is so clean and even drinkable as Japan has claimed, then how about pouring this "clean" water to your water utility system and let your citizens drink it? BTW: Looks like most western countries are basically silent about this. If the same thing happens on China, how would Japan (and those western countries) react? Western countries accuse China of their "uncontroilled" rocket debris threating lives and damaging environment, but allow Japan to dump radioactive water to the ocean. Double standard!
@jye7027
@jye7027 Год назад
japan is a vassal state of US, that why the double standard
@tomaccino
@tomaccino Год назад
This isn't about China at all. It's about radiation safety from a well-developed, transparent and democratic nation. These guys will announce on the national TV what they're going to do with the water. Don't think the CCP would tell you on the 7pm news what they're discharging in the ocean 😂
@BudyL135
@BudyL135 Год назад
Fact llol western is hyporcrite they always say its is okay. Do they live in Asia nooo
@chalbihoucem1870
@chalbihoucem1870 Год назад
This world need change
@jasonswack3583
@jasonswack3583 Год назад
go back to elementary and learn what the water cycle is
@yanggy318
@yanggy318 Год назад
if the water is safe, why they don't use it for concrete mixing and building homes and road in the country.
@nampham162
@nampham162 Год назад
Because building water pipes and distribution tanks, and other infrastructure will cost more than just dumping it into the ocean, plus, Japanese people are already enjoying abundant clean water to use, so they feel no need for extra water resources, unlike your poor country.
@jenjen8132
@jenjen8132 Год назад
⁠I don’t care! He is telling the truth!
@Amen-Magi
@Amen-Magi Год назад
Bcs
@mydearfather5192
@mydearfather5192 Год назад
Desalination of seawater and then special delivery to the everywhere instead of using a nearby fresh water source. Are you crazy?
@xiaozh5063
@xiaozh5063 11 месяцев назад
​@@mydearfather5192are you crazy? Under a such strong international pressure you think it is okay? Countries are against it because of Japanese government dont allow international checking on the so called diluted water, no one will trust Japanese government except USA and its allies, scientists around the world are expressing worries! Japanese can do something else or store it on the land by building more storage tanks, any measures! None else on earth should pay for Japanese own fault together!! Japanese so-called diluted water are highly doubtable!
@Kim-sr4eh
@Kim-sr4eh Год назад
If it is safe as Japan insist, why you want to discharge the contaminated water to ocean. Japan must keep that contaminated water in your land and use it for agricultural/industrial use. Japan must not dump the contaminated water to the ocean.
@날아다니는스파게티
옳소!!
@chenren6977
@chenren6977 Год назад
Precisely, why they don't drink it or for domestic use? The proposal from other nations is to use it for construction. Japan quickly responded that the water contain radioactive substance unhealthy for human, I struggle to imagine how it's healthy for sea lifes??? All we are trying hard to do to save the ocean will be reversed by this one action 😭😭
@JulieWang-xr5iq
@JulieWang-xr5iq Год назад
Why don’t you drink the water😅
@yewsoonfatt
@yewsoonfatt Год назад
but South Korea President Eun's govt is ready to establish a govt body to educate the s.korean that japanese radioactive water is safe. people should not oppose it.
@nampham162
@nampham162 Год назад
Because building roads and pipes and distribution systems will cost more than just dumping it into the ocean. Plus, Japanese people are already enjoying abundant clean water resources, unlike your poor country, so they feel no need to use extra water resource.
@lavendor6756
@lavendor6756 Год назад
Why Japanese isnt using that water to agricultural, industry and drinking. If they claim it is safe, then they should drink it and utilize in agricultural purpose for 10 years then let other countries know.
@vlad-marincalota6819
@vlad-marincalota6819 Год назад
Because as they said, they need to dilute it so it gets to a safe % of Tritium... can you guys even listen to all that's talked in the video?
@nampham162
@nampham162 Год назад
Because of cost vs. performance problem. Do you drink the water running out from your nuclear power plant? Or thermal power plant? Or sewage treatment plant? Or any processed industrial waste water? No. Of course you "can" do so technically, but building extra water pipes and distribution systems is just costly, while you can get clean water otherwise. Well, at least in Japan, I don't know about your place but obviously there are heck a lot of countries where even the tap water aren't drinkable.
@vlad-marincalota6819
@vlad-marincalota6819 Год назад
@user-jk8lj8wp4x ask the US about all it’s experiments. Right, it don’t matter anymore. Please, document yourself.
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
@user-jk8lj8wp4x In fact, the radiation concentration in China is higher than the treated water from Fukushima.😂
@liliu9207
@liliu9207 Год назад
@@user-mh6qm1yj9r Nonsense
@qtjps2739
@qtjps2739 Год назад
If other countries like China dumps the water, would Japan agree the water is safe?
@ForbiddTV
@ForbiddTV Год назад
China does release the same water from their 55 nuclear reactors, so obviously the answer is yes.
@nampham162
@nampham162 Год назад
They ARE duping radioactive water, about 6.5 times the amount of the Fukushima power plant.
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
In fact, the radiation concentration in China is higher than the treated water from Fukushima.
@mydearfather5192
@mydearfather5192 Год назад
LOL. Remember, your country's nuclear plants are dumping more than 10 times the amount of adioactive waste that Fukushima plans to emit annually. What makes it even worse is that your country discharges the radioactive water into the shallower sea, WITHOUT the approval of neighboring countries, WITHOUT on-site monitoring and inspection by a third party such as the IAEA, which ensures that the treated-water discharged from Fukushima meets international standards, while your country's nuclear power plants do not. The anti-Japanese scientific illiteracy from certain countries' avoidance and collective silence on their own country's dumping of nuclear contaminated water exposes their blatant double standards.
@giovanni-ed7zq
@giovanni-ed7zq 11 месяцев назад
do some research, china has been dumping untreated radioactive waste water from 5 nuke plants into the pacific for years.
@XinruZhuang33
@XinruZhuang33 11 месяцев назад
An intriguing piece of data: The Japanese government allocated a PR budget of 70 billion yen for the discharge of radioactive water. The cost of releasing radioactive water into the ocean was 3.4 billion yen, while the cost of releasing steam amounted to 34.9 billion yen.🙃
@xwtek3505
@xwtek3505 11 месяцев назад
And Japan would need another PR campaign for the steam release as it "dirties the sky"
@markerman206
@markerman206 11 месяцев назад
Maybe that's because of people who just don't listen and think that "nuclear = bad" all the time without doing ANY research and think that their opinion is better then thousands of expert opinions.
@cobytang
@cobytang 10 месяцев назад
Where are your sources???
@QKYqaq
@QKYqaq 11 месяцев назад
Imagine China is doing what Japan gonna do, what will The US say.
@iynur
@iynur 11 месяцев назад
Lol
@user-nk4fy7ki1u
@user-nk4fy7ki1u 11 месяцев назад
那早都该跳脚了,这种双标的事情又不是一次两次了
@yls-qp1br
@yls-qp1br 11 месяцев назад
They will block all China's economy and even fight a war
@TenHorizons
@TenHorizons 11 месяцев назад
China actually has 55 nuclear plants, 3rd highest number worldwide, and each is releasing radioactive water with higher levels of tritium than what Japan is releasing for Fukushima. A quick search online will show you the answer Edit: sorry, it is 20+ nuclear power plants, and 50+ power units as of 2022. Still, I found a report on NHK World Japan that claims China has 13 power plants in china each releasing more redioactive tritium into oceans in 2021 than the one planned to be released in Fukushima
@user-kv3hy1jm4i
@user-kv3hy1jm4i 11 месяцев назад
⁠@@TenHorizonsBut they don't release it into the ocean😢Japan just want to pass on the pollution to the whole world,so selfish ,without conscience😅
@lesipapo7876
@lesipapo7876 2 года назад
The Japanese really know how to utilize their animation talent --even in the midst of a nuclear disaster.
@skfardin65
@skfardin65 2 года назад
How
@shirleymaemattthews4862
@shirleymaemattthews4862 2 года назад
Nah. Anime is garbage. And besides, Japanese people can make cartoons without it being anime, and Americans can also make anime too.
@smalls5001
@smalls5001 2 года назад
no i do not know
@shukrantpatil
@shukrantpatil 2 года назад
@@shirleymaemattthews4862 It kind of is , but at the same time it isn't . And americans once attempted to make anime and it went horribly wrong .
@uh9066
@uh9066 2 года назад
No is not, it's full of pedoss material who will destroy our generation
@golfhk
@golfhk Год назад
Thank you Japan. Looking forward to the cancer cases growing all over the world. Radioactive fishes on the shelf for everyone to taste.
@tomaccino
@tomaccino Год назад
You obviously have no idea what is tritium and what it decays into.
@tumeke4328
@tumeke4328 Год назад
​@tomajination please explain
@tumeke4328
@tumeke4328 Год назад
​@tomajination all I know is it doesn't belong in our planets oceans our worlds already extremely suffering
@tomaccino
@tomaccino Год назад
@@tumeke4328 Tritium occurs naturally, you're already exposed to it even if you lived before the industrial revolution. What do you mean it doesn't belong in oceans? You also know bananas are radioactive, right? People need to study nuclear science.
@adelalmohtaseb5261
@adelalmohtaseb5261 Год назад
You know USA once nuked the pacific ocean right ?
@Obiwan-ik2tw
@Obiwan-ik2tw Год назад
That's insane. Don't dump this terrible contaminated water into our ocean. The ocean is for the next generation!!!!
@changelieen
@changelieen Год назад
@@johanqian1858 they don't care! and if you show your concern, they will drag the other countries into this ,and say all others are doing the same thing. and claim their nuclear waste is safe and cldean. I wonder what japanese fishermen think about it.
@MonEsperance
@MonEsperance Год назад
As well as for us..
@adelalmohtaseb5261
@adelalmohtaseb5261 Год назад
You know USA once nuked the pacific ocean right ?
@macbook3562
@macbook3562 Год назад
Every nation which has nuclear power plants dump the water😅
@wang06411
@wang06411 Год назад
@@adelalmohtaseb5261nuclear bomb and radioactive nuclear reactor is different….
@moonlalune8003
@moonlalune8003 Год назад
I guess the real, true test is, like what one commenter in a similar video recently, is for Japan to dump it in their own back yard, a lake, and see what it does to fresh water fish and the risks of consuming those fish.
@CorralSummer
@CorralSummer 11 месяцев назад
Considering it's salt water the fish will probably die.
@person880
@person880 11 месяцев назад
It is saltwater. Your suggestion is ridiculous. No other company or country has ever had to do something like that. Nuclear power plants around the world routinely release water with tritium in it all the time.
@tetrabromobisphenol
@tetrabromobisphenol 11 месяцев назад
@@CorralSummer Not true. The water that they've collected is runoff from the land, it is freshwater with enough radionuclides in it to be somewhat dangerous if discharged untreated. They mix it with seawater to dilute it, but it's freshwater up until that dilution step.
@paoda2497
@paoda2497 Год назад
Japan focuses more on saving cost instead of safeguarding marine environment and protecting people’s life and health. On the disposal of nuclear-contaminated water, there are options including long-term storage, hydrogen release, geosphere injection, underground burial, and vapor release. Japan has chosen the discharge plan with minimum cost among all options, shifting the risks of nuclear contamination to the rest of the world. The act of putting money ahead of people’s life and health is doomed to be opposed by the international community.
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
Are you from a country far above the IAEA standards?
@novaboy1174
@novaboy1174 Год назад
You gotta love capitalism 😂
@paoda2497
@paoda2497 Год назад
@@user-mh6qm1yj9r I want to remind you two things.1. The so-called IAEA report is NOT A LICENSE to unscrupulously discharge nuclear-contaminated water into the sea, Japanese government neither asked locals nor other country for permission, while its behavior is threatening safety and health of the whole world. 2. IAEA rushed the release of the integrated assessment report without sufficient consultation with technical working group experts. IAEA subsequently also stated on its official website that the discharge of "treated water" (nuclear-contaminated water) stored at the Fukushima nuclear power plant was a national decision of the Japanese Government and that the report was neither a recommendation nor an endorsement of that policy.
@mydearfather5192
@mydearfather5192 Год назад
Why don't Koreans drink the cooling water of their nuclear plants if their radioactive waste water is so clear that they could dump it into the sea? maybe it's because Unlike the IAEA team in Fukushima, there's no international organization stationed in the Korea to make sure the Korean radioactive water they dumping into the sea meet the international standard. So we don't know what exactly happened in Korea, whether they are lying about their nuclear waste water.
@mydearfather5192
@mydearfather5192 Год назад
your country's nuclear power plants are discharging more than 10 times the amount of radiation that Fukushima plans to emit annually. What's even worse is that your country discharges the radioactive water into the shallower sea which is even closer, without the approval of neighboring countries, without on-site monitoring and inspection by a third party such as the IAEA, which ensures that the treated-water discharged from Fukushima meets international standards, while your country's nuclear power plants do not. The anti-Japanese scientific illiteracy from certain countries' avoidance and collective silence on their own country's dumping of nuclear contaminated water exposes their blatant double standards.
@Greekmilsim
@Greekmilsim Год назад
This is not an excuse .Radiation is deadly it is not a game to play with .They should find another way for fuel
@ForbiddTV
@ForbiddTV Год назад
Wow, so dumb. Nuclear energy is the safest form of electricity we have.
@Greekmilsim
@Greekmilsim Год назад
@@ForbiddTV safest 😂😂😂😂 say that to chernobyl victims and dead workers
@vewseryt7297
@vewseryt7297 Год назад
radietion i dedly you are scientific illiterate
@cookiemonxchu
@cookiemonxchu Год назад
Even the designer of the nuclear plant said people should stop what Japan is trying to do now... He recommended to build a big tank to restore the water for 30 years. And then they need to release after 30 years.
@vewseryt7297
@vewseryt7297 Год назад
@@cookiemonxchu the builder of the plant as zero authority against the approval of the iaea
@yuqu4539
@yuqu4539 Год назад
Many people say that ordinary people pay attention to the nuclear sewage discharge into the sea is useless, but I want to say that if you do not pay attention to this matter, there is no way to solve it, even if our power is small, we should pay attention to it, this is a major event concerning the fate and security of all mankind, even if it is to understand its harm, even if it is to silently resist it, can not ignore this matter [angry]. (Forward it, as soon as possible, as much as possible!) ​
@SteveWright-oy8ky
@SteveWright-oy8ky Год назад
The water leaking from the reactor should only be recycled back thru the reactor's core, treated and re-treated , not released ! There is no purpose in using fresh water for cooling the reactor when there is an adequate supply of water already contaminated that can simply be re-cycled back thru the reactor. You DON'T DUMP the radioactive water from the PRIMARY COOLING LOOP of a reactor after it has been irradiated, so why dump this water when it can be cycled time and again thru the reactor !
@figgettit
@figgettit Год назад
or used at any other plant in japan. of which there are so many. somethings not right with the journalism - the core question of why this needs to go in the ocean is not even being asked!!
@mydearfather5192
@mydearfather5192 Год назад
the plant was retied long ago. Even if you have elementary school level reading skills, you should know that they will remove all radioisotopes except tritium before discharging and dilute the tritium with seawater, as is the international practice, until all indicators meet international discharge standards. IAEA reports have long recognized the reliability and feasibility of TEPCO's treatment program.
@SteveWright-oy8ky
@SteveWright-oy8ky Год назад
@@mydearfather5192 If you mean ,RETIRED , it went off line due to the quake FIRST, then from the flood waters SECOND ! Claiming, " You Should KNOW" is a fool's errand statement ! Unless YOU are there to check the radionuclide levels at every stage of supposed treatment and have the FINAL WORD on the safety of the water, then you DON'T KNOW what is REALLY going on ! The IAEA has only a LIMITED control of the operations there ! And it was TEPCO that wanted to dump the reactor core's water into the ocean in the first place and would have done so if not for the PEOPLE of JAPAN speaking out LOUDEST in the nuclear aftermath !
@gabrielquinones3343
@gabrielquinones3343 11 месяцев назад
@@mydearfather5192your right the water which is used as coolant should return to normal seawater nuclear which know by knowledge can help the earth in the long run less heat renewable resources and is less harmful than coal oil and electric
@jixuanwu4009
@jixuanwu4009 2 месяца назад
@@mydearfather5192 then use it in agriculture
@timchoi2868
@timchoi2868 2 года назад
If the treated water really is as clean as they claim even drinkable so to say, then what is the point of releasing into the ocean? Just release it within the islands of Japan: wells, sewers, mountains, even give away to the citizens of Japan as free drinks!
@debbiemaycry
@debbiemaycry 2 года назад
that's the thing, it's only safe if diluted enough. If they only release it in Japan, it won't be diluted enough. The dose makes the venom. Even water kills if you drink enough of it.
@4vesta255
@4vesta255 2 года назад
The Fukushima water is seawater. If you dump it into the drinking water supply, you’ll contaminate it, not with radioactivity, but with salt.
@arnowisp6244
@arnowisp6244 2 года назад
Touche.
@MrLince-hr4of
@MrLince-hr4of 2 года назад
Tim Choi yes you are right ! or even better sell it exclusive to USA in bottles to drink 🤣 shiny fresh
@stefamart7
@stefamart7 2 года назад
Just think about it: those water containers have always been right near the ocean and to release the water in the ocean is super easy. If they were to do what you said it would be a logistical mess, it would cost a ton of money and if you'd put too much water in a short amount of time you'd risk to cause floods.
@oiliollo
@oiliollo 11 месяцев назад
This is definitely painful to see . The ocean is not yours, we share it. The ocean is the origin of lives 💔
@HitoshiNagata-jj2hw
@HitoshiNagata-jj2hw 11 месяцев назад
And nothing will happen
@sen-jingflagburn
@sen-jingflagburn 11 месяцев назад
Japan is more precious than you~
@synvaVal
@synvaVal 11 месяцев назад
@@sen-jingflagburnGrow up
@TH-lu9du
@TH-lu9du 11 месяцев назад
The ocean is not yours either, we share it. That's why we're here to have a rational, scientific understanding of tritiated water, which nuclear power plants around the world release to the ocean. ❤
@tomy34188
@tomy34188 11 месяцев назад
The fishing industry does more damage to the ocean in a day, than this nuclear sewage will do in 20 years. Shark populations are down 90% and important habitats of marine life gets devastated by trawls as I write this. Yet, there is no outrage whatsoever and people keep eating their fish without a second thought. This is very hypocritical.
@davidmyers4056
@davidmyers4056 Год назад
It may seem a small amout but what about the cumulative effect of other plants releasing just a little bit. Plus all the other toxins dumped. How can an ocean cope with.
@neurophilosophers994
@neurophilosophers994 Год назад
It can’t … bioavailability of radioactive molecules in seafood. I only eat seafood like a couple times a year now mostly when forced by social situations. They’re trying to play down the effect of the meltdown and calm people down. Same as the 1.5 million gallons of radioactive water in the US. Fukushima is on a whole other scale though
@PaulaFung
@PaulaFung Год назад
Some people are trying to mislead others by claiming that nuclear power plants around the world also discharge nuclear wastewater like Fukushima into the ocean. The fact is Fukushima nuclear wastewater is fundamentally different from normal plants. Normal nuclear power plants have three separate cooling systems that do not contact each other. The third cooling system cooled by seawater does not contact reactor materials at all! In contrast, the nuclear wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear power plant was used to cool the melted reactor core, directly contacting the highly radioactive reactor materials. Such nuclear wastewater contains many other radioactive substances in addition to tritium.
@hjkim8595
@hjkim8595 Год назад
Best explanation!
@Cecilia-ky3uw
@Cecilia-ky3uw Год назад
Yes, but that radioactivity is dilluted with its release, the ratios simlly are insignifigant. And most of the substances are removed.
@user-uz8lq7bd1j
@user-uz8lq7bd1j Год назад
@@Cecilia-ky3uw就问你有没有污染了环境,应不应该给全世界补偿金,毕竟原本这是日本自己的污染,可现在要牺牲整个地球环境及全人类的健康去帮它稀释。
@Lucky-qd6nh
@Lucky-qd6nh Год назад
@@Cecilia-ky3uwI will believe you if you drink it
@giovannirafael5351
@giovannirafael5351 Год назад
The water was treated and the only thing "remaining" is tritium, which is why they're releasing into the sea so the tritium is diluted with normal water.
@dbt9260
@dbt9260 Год назад
dump their own land or lake
@mebewonder
@mebewonder Год назад
If it's so safe, people who supports this idea should use it as their drinking water.
@tomaccino
@tomaccino Год назад
You missed the point of what "safe" means. It's safe to be diluted into the oceans, not to straight up drink shots of it. It's like you didn't watch the video 🤦
@andreasirawan1906
@andreasirawan1906 Год назад
@@tomaccino The Japanese government will do anything as long as Japan is safe. Japanese people are very selfish.
@adelalmohtaseb5261
@adelalmohtaseb5261 Год назад
You know USA once nuked the pacific ocean right ?
@figgettit
@figgettit Год назад
its called an obama sip
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
希釈って知ってる?😂
@hoyintse2454
@hoyintse2454 2 года назад
If one big fish eat 10 small fish, the big fish would have 11 fish worth of radiation.
@howardnie2923
@howardnie2923 Год назад
and we will eat the big fish,so....
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
In fact, the radiation concentration in China is higher than the treated water from Fukushima.
@Dave--FkTheDeepstate
@Dave--FkTheDeepstate 2 года назад
Why don't they keep reusing the same, contaminated water (after filtering it), instead of creating more and more?
@lv3184
@lv3184 2 года назад
They actually do reuse the cooling water. The surplus water comes from ground and rainwater infiltrating into the damaged buildings and mixing with the contaminated cooling water. So everyday they pump about 50 tons of cooling water into the reactors but they have to remove about 100-150 tons per day.
@JeepCherokeeful
@JeepCherokeeful 2 года назад
Might become too concentrated and cause an uncontrolled nuclear reaction;( not for sure but just a thought.
@peter3756
@peter3756 2 года назад
I think there are much more urgent nuclear waste problems at nuke-test sites, high-level radioactive materials ('plutonium' chunks) leaching out into the Ocean? Have they compared the amount of tritium release from other nations around the globe and high-level radioactive materials seeping out of nuclear bomb test sites? Other countries such as France, UK, Canada, S. Korea, etc, release far higher concentration of tritium each year into the ocean and the air for decades from their nuclear power plants, For example, Seoul, South Korea, has several times higher environmental radiation reading than that of Tokyo. China's claims are also (knowingly/intentionally) false. China's notorious for being a major polluter of water, soil and air, censoring all scientific reports that sound negative. IAEA has approved the release of the Fukushima water. What S. Korean and Chinese are claiming make no sense. It is apparent from this that they have been knowingly making false claims solely to bash Japanese.
@stefamart7
@stefamart7 2 года назад
Because if you expose it 100 times it will get more and more contaminated. Now it's so little contamimated that there is no problem, but if it were more contaminated it would be problematic. Also: when you filter something it's not like radiation disappears. You just move what you've filtered in the filter. It you filter once it's ok, the filter will be a little little radioactive and there would be no problem. But if you had to filter the water 100 times it would get really radioactive and it would be a problem again. Also: it's a ton of water. It would be a mess to filter it every time and it would be cost a lot
@anxiousearth680
@anxiousearth680 Год назад
@@stefamart7 Actually, the water released is filtered through something called ALPS. Tritium is just really hard to seperate with current tech.
@Chryeon
@Chryeon 11 месяцев назад
Japan : lets share the love and spread it world wide!!
@waikitjim5668
@waikitjim5668 Год назад
Let the PM of Japan drink first
@deegythegolden5968
@deegythegolden5968 Год назад
I work with some of the highest activity tritium in the world. It's about 20-30 curies per kg. I'd love to know the activity of the water in those tanks???
@whitewolf2767
@whitewolf2767 Год назад
you are not qualified enough
@Jamsybob
@Jamsybob Год назад
​@White wolf what qualifications do you have?
@liangjiang3122
@liangjiang3122 Год назад
The danger isn't with tritium. The waste water has radioactive metal in it. It will be concentrated by the ecosystem. All of these videos on Tritium are just diversion tactics.
@whitewolf2767
@whitewolf2767 Год назад
@@liangjiang3122 do you know how much tritium the sea water has? A lot.....
@RockENZOwg
@RockENZOwg Год назад
@@whitewolf2767 who r u then?
@mohamedunknown8351
@mohamedunknown8351 11 месяцев назад
The world can live without Japan, but it cannot live without oceans!
@ahmadahmal2942
@ahmadahmal2942 11 месяцев назад
Remember Japan takes order from USA....
@DrPhoenixJKZ
@DrPhoenixJKZ 9 месяцев назад
Japanese citizens, especially fishermen in Fukushima, are also largely against the decision. If we do not update the world’s politics to reduce capitalism influence, the governments will never really serve people, especially not in Japan or USA.
@user-zk2cg7yq9z
@user-zk2cg7yq9z 11 месяцев назад
ここにいる奴ら分かったフリして何も分かってないの草
@jerrycui
@jerrycui 2 года назад
1. 为什么没地方存储了才排放? 2. 如果无害,为什么不直接通过城市下水道过滤后给自己国民使用?
@eunicestuart629
@eunicestuart629 Год назад
建议他们自己喝,你看楼上一个鬼子还在说什么别的国家自来水不能喝什么的😅
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
希釈って知ってる?Chinese
@Ray-zj4wf
@Ray-zj4wf 11 месяцев назад
@@user-mh6qm1yj9r bro so you think the ocean only owned by Japan? using the whole world's resources(ocean) to dilute the water from Japan, isnt it too selfish and inconsiderate?
@jaylee0810
@jaylee0810 Год назад
If it is so safe, Japanese people should use it as drinking water.
@anxiousearth680
@anxiousearth680 Год назад
All water flows back to the sea....
@lktan224
@lktan224 Год назад
The PM of Japan should drink it to proof its safe as said. When Singapore introduced NEWater a product of treat sewage water as potable water the Prime Minister drank it to show it safe as claimed.
@vlad-marincalota6819
@vlad-marincalota6819 Год назад
Because as they said, they need to dilute it so it gets to a safe % of Tritium... can you guys even listen to all that's talked in the video?
@adityapermana9651
@adityapermana9651 Год назад
@@vlad-marincalota6819 They just here for the Video titles, their IQ is so low that they doesnt understand if the real problem about this issue is in fact about Trust, and not about Health Risk
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
希釈って知ってる?😂
@alantatty1560
@alantatty1560 Год назад
If Japan's think the nuclear contaminated water so safe for dumped into the sea, why not dumping into their own landscape instead.😢
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
希釈って知ってる?
@dandare2586
@dandare2586 2 года назад
Every American should remember of the 1100+ US nuclear tests ( many undertaken in the Pacific), were the equivalent to detonating the Horoshima bomb twice a day for months. The US reactors sold to Japan were also not fit for purpose, only having limited in vessel containment & basically surrounded by a warehouse with extra concrete under the reactor.
@IkeOkerekeNews
@IkeOkerekeNews 2 года назад
Evidence for the reactors?
@dandare2586
@dandare2586 2 года назад
@@IkeOkerekeNews Google is your friend.....
@IkeOkerekeNews
@IkeOkerekeNews 2 года назад
@@dandare2586 You made the claim, you provide the evidence.
@dandare2586
@dandare2586 2 года назад
@@user-if1de8pt2j It was a culmination of events & design errors, like keeping the radioactive fuel above the reactors. Which has highly complicated the clean up effort.
@simeonsimon6440
@simeonsimon6440 2 года назад
Siemans told the japanese government multiple times that the reactors wouldn't be safe and they were told to continue. Get your facts straight before you spout nonsense.
@greysky4072
@greysky4072 11 месяцев назад
JAPAN has been great at telling all sorts of lies.
@yongjinnkim9207
@yongjinnkim9207 Год назад
It’s known that the uranium rods are out of control and the melting core of the reactor gets down digging to the ground. The wastewater comes from the action of cooling the rods with massive radioactive things. The core of the reactor even emits radiation up to the point that a digital camera is broken down and uncontrollable. It is truly doubtful how can they filter a lot of radioactive elements from the seriously contaminated wastewater. If there is a person who knows the mechanism of action of ALPS, let me know. Every source says it is safe, but nobody knows how it is working exactly. Aside from the scientific background, if it is genuinely edible, why do they waste the water? They can drink, use for the factory, and it can be useable for rice farming which demands colossal amounts of water. Isn't water essential for the rice which is the staple of Japanese? Money for logistics of the water? Aren't they the 3rd richest country on earth? We know 迷惑 is the virtue of the modern Japanese. 迷惑 is only for the Japanese? Does it exclude the neighbouring countries? And what about the marine environment? Do you think it is okay for the creatures of the Pacific? Show trust! If it is drinkable, you drink it all!
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
@user-jk8lj8wp4x天安門
@mydearfather5192
@mydearfather5192 Год назад
Why don't Koreans drink the cooling water of their nuclear plants if their radioactive waste water is so clear that they could dump it into the sea?
@mydearfather5192
@mydearfather5192 Год назад
Unlike the IAEA team in Fukushima, no international group is stationed in the Korea to make sure the Korean radioactive water they dumping into the sea meet the international standard. So we don't know what exactly happened in Korea, whether they are lying about their nuclear waste water.
@mydearfather5192
@mydearfather5192 Год назад
Your toilet water is not radioactive, and it's fresh water not seawater, so why don't you just pick it up and drink it. Take the product from the sewage treatment plant and make it into bottled drinking water, will you? Never discharge it into the rivers and oceans, bsc you're polluting the world! Remember, your country's nuclear plants are dumping more than 10 times the amount of adioactive waste that Fukushima plans to emit annually. What makes it even worse is that your country discharges the radioactive water into the shallower sea, WITHOUT the approval of neighboring countries, WITHOUT on-site monitoring and inspection by a third party such as the IAEA, which ensures that the treated-water discharged from Fukushima meets international standards, while your country's nuclear power plants do not. The anti-Japanese scientific illiteracy from certain countries' avoidance and collective silence on their own country's dumping of nuclear contaminated water exposes their blatant double standards.
@nemolai7989
@nemolai7989 Год назад
@@user-mh6qm1yj9r 这个和日本排放核废料有什么关系,现在有问题就说现在,这种时候还说天安门明显就是你在没事找事,天安门除了中国其他历史书里都写着
@DetectiveBunk1011
@DetectiveBunk1011 11 месяцев назад
War crimes and crimes against humanity, that is Japan’s legacy
@syang7775
@syang7775 11 месяцев назад
And to cover up, Japanese government is spending 700 bn yuan on bots and global media.
@leojones22
@leojones22 11 месяцев назад
Not even a peep or protest from Japan's allies USA Britain Australia etc etc, this must be what they call being like minded and so-called shared values at its finest. Hypocrisy..
@bintara_bae
@bintara_bae 11 месяцев назад
The world can live without Japan, but the world cannot live without the sea
@ladridwan800
@ladridwan800 11 месяцев назад
@ZaiexO weebs huh
@siuchen7140
@siuchen7140 11 месяцев назад
Keep it to yourself if it safe..use it for bath or cooking
@KasusEpykMusykII
@KasusEpykMusykII Год назад
How we can resolve the problem of the radioactive water? Japan: *_yes._*
@ForbiddTV
@ForbiddTV Год назад
Why do you think there is a 'problem'?
@KasusEpykMusykII
@KasusEpykMusykII Год назад
@@ForbiddTV Don't worry, there's no problem. It's healthy water, without any problem for health. You can also drink it.
@ForbiddTV
@ForbiddTV Год назад
@@KasusEpykMusykII We all drink it. All nuclear power plants on the planet release the same tritiated water, and nature has produced it since the beginning of time.
@KasusEpykMusykII
@KasusEpykMusykII Год назад
@@ForbiddTV Well, it's a pleasure for the other people but not for me, as I don't drink it. Cheers.
@ForbiddTV
@ForbiddTV Год назад
@@KasusEpykMusykII That's interesting, what planet are you from?
@user-xd8lj4lv7h
@user-xd8lj4lv7h Год назад
Please save our sea...
@azumishimizu1880
@azumishimizu1880 Год назад
NO!
@sarahsokal
@sarahsokal Год назад
& us .... rain 🌧 ❄️ will fall off . Forget fish 🐟 especially Tuna & large fish. Wait ✋️ don't wonder if there is a big mess after in California/?British Columbia Canada
@TheHollandHS
@TheHollandHS Год назад
You save our sea you hypocrite 🌊
@Nameless_Individual
@Nameless_Individual 7 месяцев назад
It's not going anywhere lol.
@Micsquzzy69
@Micsquzzy69 2 года назад
Next thing you know Godzilla will appear
@taoyao829
@taoyao829 11 месяцев назад
Do you still think Japan is an ally, democratic, polite, clean and friendly country
@user-rx4rf9il8p
@user-rx4rf9il8p Год назад
Since the nuclear sewage is so clean, the Japanese natives drank it, so why discharge it?
@alexchannel3187
@alexchannel3187 2 года назад
but why are they accumulating all that water in the first place? can'T they just continue to use it?
@warlockgod66
@warlockgod66 2 года назад
If I had to guess if they could continue using the water it's going to just keep getting more contaminated and more dangerous and it hit a point where it'll be too radioactive and unusable into contaminated and dangerous to dump in the ocean or anywhere else so it's best to dump it or figure out something to do with it now since the radiation is still low enough to where they can make it way less harmful to people
@augustlandmesser1520
@augustlandmesser1520 Год назад
Luckily nuclear power is proclaimed as a green source of energy, so no worries. And don't smoke, that causes cancer.
@staycalm.
@staycalm. Год назад
Im not saying it happens but i imagine everywhere with nuclear stuff discretely dumps nuclear waste all the time doubt it just disapears or is stored safely
@augustlandmesser1520
@augustlandmesser1520 Год назад
Actually, they do that all the time. And no one can determine what causes the number of cancers to rise.
@nickzhou3910
@nickzhou3910 11 месяцев назад
If everyone agrees that 'diluted and drained the sea' is the solution to pollution/garbage, then Pandora's box has been opened! What else can't be discharged into the sea?
@aristidist8908
@aristidist8908 2 года назад
Everybody gangsta with radiation until Godzilla rises from Ocean.
@atvelasco15
@atvelasco15 2 года назад
😂
@stefankruger3634
@stefankruger3634 Год назад
La Hage and Sellafield had a pipe into the ocean and both emit more tritium as the water from fukushima.
@ForbiddTV
@ForbiddTV Год назад
All nuclear power plants on the planet release the same tritiated water.
@augustlandmesser1520
@augustlandmesser1520 Год назад
That suppose to be comforting to someone?
@josephburchanowski4636
@josephburchanowski4636 2 года назад
You know, considering that people are also afraid of medical scans; perhaps it would have been better to say that one micro Sievert is equivalent to the radiation dose from eating 10 bananas.
@peter3756
@peter3756 2 года назад
I think there are much more urgent nuclear waste problems at nuke-test sites, high-level radioactive materials ('plutonium' chunks) leaching out into the Ocean? Have they compared the amount of tritium release from other nations around the globe and high-level radioactive materials seeping out of nuclear bomb test sites? Other countries such as France, UK, Canada, S. Korea, etc, release far higher concentration of tritium each year into the ocean and the air for decades from their nuclear power plants, For example, Seoul, South Korea, has several times higher environmental radiation reading than that of Tokyo. China's claims are also (knowingly/intentionally) false. China's notorious for being a major polluter of water, soil and air, censoring all scientific reports that sound negative. IAEA has approved the release of the Fukushima water. What S. Korean and Chinese are claiming make no sense. It is apparent from this that they have been knowingly making false claims solely to bash Japanese.
@arnowisp6244
@arnowisp6244 2 года назад
Most people can't eat ten bananas in one sitting.
@josephburchanowski4636
@josephburchanowski4636 2 года назад
@@arnowisp6244 But you can easily eat ten bananas within one year. 2:12: "The dose to the consumers who are at most at risk, would be about 1 microSievert per year."
@augustlandmesser1520
@augustlandmesser1520 2 года назад
That "banana radiation" thing is the most ignorant view on radiation. Ask Litvinenko.
@AHeroOfAzeroth
@AHeroOfAzeroth 2 года назад
The data for radioactivity of these waste waster are released by TEPCO.
@user-zr3fc8fi3r
@user-zr3fc8fi3r 11 месяцев назад
Heard that Tokyo is lack of water, why don’t Japanese just transfer those so called purified water to Tokyo and drink it?
@user-nm9nu6sy9q
@user-nm9nu6sy9q Год назад
Oppose Japan's release of nuclear wastewater!
@ForbiddTV
@ForbiddTV 11 месяцев назад
And why is that? 32 countries release the same tritiated water, INCLUDING YOURS!
@hoiweng.cheong
@hoiweng.cheong 2 года назад
If the water is fine, why don't Japanese government reuse those water to the city water system why have to dump it in to the ocean? Japanese has less water. What a waste yea?
@AlCatSplat
@AlCatSplat Год назад
If treated sewage is safe why don't you drink it?
@hoiweng.cheong
@hoiweng.cheong Год назад
@@AlCatSplat that why I'm say let Japanese people reuse those waste water instead of dumping into the ocean
@AlCatSplat
@AlCatSplat Год назад
@@hoiweng.cheong Loading the water on trucks and delivering it to the municipal water supply would do more damage to the environment than simply dumping it into the ocean.
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
@@hoiweng.cheong差別主義者やん
@user-bd4hk5ds4q
@user-bd4hk5ds4q Год назад
If the water isn't bad, just use water from Japan itself. Use it for drinking water, industrial water, and agricultural water.
@jasonswack3583
@jasonswack3583 Год назад
bro doesnt know what the water cycle is
@liliu9207
@liliu9207 Год назад
@@jasonswack3583 if you say we don't know, then why not let it cycle in your own country???
@elise9259
@elise9259 11 месяцев назад
Strongly agree!!!!! And they start releasing radioactive water to the ocean right now and gonna be continued for next 30 more years
@person880
@person880 11 месяцев назад
Because it is salt water from the ocean. When they say it's safe for drinking, they are referring to the radioactivity of the water. The water itself is still salty, and it not stored or transported in containers that are safe for holding regular drinking water. Multiple agencies that have actual credentials have approved this plan. Who are you to say otherwise? And why would someone claiming something is safe mean they have to use it themselves? Nuclear power plants around the world regularly release water with tritium in it. Please stop the fear-mongering.
@shadowliam4763
@shadowliam4763 11 месяцев назад
I'm mean I'm not supposed Japan but who you supposed was waste 65 times more cause sea pollination
@itsclee
@itsclee 11 месяцев назад
The scientist in the video didn't explain the differences between radioactive exposure from a short-lived form like an X-ray and from consuming contaminated water or food. That latter is having a longer-lasting impact.
@Mibs-Mibby
@Mibs-Mibby Год назад
No more sushi
@larryhoppe7662
@larryhoppe7662 Год назад
We may have a new 2+1 sushi combo. Two headed fish with one tail
@Rockybaikalov
@Rockybaikalov 2 года назад
The birth of Kaiju(s) and Godzilla will start from here.
@ML-fr1ep
@ML-fr1ep 2 года назад
If its really that safe they should drink by themselves
@whitewolf2767
@whitewolf2767 Год назад
Do you drink sea water
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
希釈って知ってる?
@Cyyanss
@Cyyanss 11 месяцев назад
It’s probably a issue with concentration. This radiation is fine spread out in the ocean as the volume of water makes it irrelevant once it’s out. Overhyped issue.
@ryanunderwood7923
@ryanunderwood7923 2 года назад
Love it how they don't talk about the millions of gallons of untreated water that has been continuously seeping into the ocean from under the damaged and flooded reactor cores. This is just a red herring.
@user-nv6ww7kg8g
@user-nv6ww7kg8g 11 месяцев назад
。。。也就是说他们早在排放了,甚至是根本没有经过处理的核废水!
@mengyuwang7258
@mengyuwang7258 11 месяцев назад
Stop buying anything from Japan
@samuelo5052
@samuelo5052 11 месяцев назад
I really like this video and the interviews. It is a issue of balancing dangers, and I think that starting release now and doing it super slowly to allow dilution to be effective is very important. Remember that if a disaster happens and all the water is released at once that would be SIGNIFICANTLY worse than a slow release over years
@shinghokwong2455
@shinghokwong2455 11 месяцев назад
Japan say Ocean is belong to me . i dump it so what? After few year to flow to other side, it is none of my business.
@QiuQiuChannel-ni3xj
@QiuQiuChannel-ni3xj 11 месяцев назад
Dumping nuke waste into the sea, This can be considered crime against the whole humanity and nature🤬
@italiansuperpc
@italiansuperpc 11 месяцев назад
China always do it. Qinshan power plant in Zhejiang Province released 218 trillion becquerels of tritium in 2021.
@syang7775
@syang7775 11 месяцев назад
@@italiansuperpc Japan is dumping nuclear contaminated water. Big difference!
@italiansuperpc
@italiansuperpc 11 месяцев назад
@@syang7775 Explain what is difference of 1 Ton of tritium mix to 1 million liters of water from Fukushima and 1 Ton of tritium from normal nuclear waste water? Lets add that all the other isotope where removed and monitored by many outside agencies. In the case of the Chinese release are not monitored by any one outside and the data is by an agency controlled by CCCP. China as zero track record of not lie, last one is call Corona. Ps I am against nuclear energy i am from a Country where we voted and eleminated 30 years ago. PPS I am not happy about this situation but it is the only logic solution. What upset me is the Chinese government scheme. China as a lot of issue now, let's distract the people with pm of favourite target. Chinese people can be worried but need learn to research and first fix the issue china is creating in particular pollution.
@brucekim9266
@brucekim9266 Год назад
It is safe, but it is not used in Japan. It's safe, but I'll throw it straight into the sea
@AlCatSplat
@AlCatSplat Год назад
If treated sewage is safe why don't you drink it?
@joey3291
@joey3291 Год назад
why no mention about the huge amount of caesium in the Japanese nuclear water that can not be removed by their water treatment methods
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
In fact, the radiation concentration in China is higher than the treated water from Fukushima.
@mydearfather5192
@mydearfather5192 Год назад
Aren't you even capable of doing some elementary school level reading?
@AYUY-rp6wj
@AYUY-rp6wj Год назад
​@@mydearfather5192why don't you demonstrate it first cuz ur clearly lacking in this field😊
@derpymcderpello5381
@derpymcderpello5381 11 месяцев назад
The cesium is removed by the water treatment methods.
@joey3291
@joey3291 11 месяцев назад
@@derpymcderpello5381No, it is not.
@Lucky-qd6nh
@Lucky-qd6nh Год назад
Japan: Hey it's not a big deal. Relax😂
@Flamingpangolin
@Flamingpangolin 11 месяцев назад
It's like no one in the comment section actually listened to what the video explained
@September2004
@September2004 3 месяца назад
And shockingly repetitive.
@rl6137
@rl6137 11 месяцев назад
IAEA report: "Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information contained in this report, neither the IAEA nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from its use." basically stating it's none of their biz if things go south
@johndaryl4272
@johndaryl4272 11 месяцев назад
Excellent disclaimer 😂
@absurdbird3556
@absurdbird3556 2 года назад
_"...Homeopaths from all over the world have raised concerns."_
@odderlendsolvang3790
@odderlendsolvang3790 2 года назад
lol
@Mikeyee2173
@Mikeyee2173 Год назад
if the nuclear waste water has no harm, why dont dump it to the Japan’s river or lake ?
@ForbiddTV
@ForbiddTV Год назад
Because it is a long distance from any river or lake. All nuclear power plants on the planet release the same tritiated water, and some do release it into a river or lake.
@anxiousearth680
@anxiousearth680 Год назад
The plants are already by the sea. Why pump water inland just to flow back into the sea again?
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
もう少しおべんきょう頑張れ
@person880
@person880 11 месяцев назад
Because it is salt water from the ocean. Please use your brain.
@deadlinefortheendtribulati4437
Take the water and mix it with concrete a make more land for Japan just make sure to cover the concrete blocks with a layer of lead and ceramic.
@Frosty-420
@Frosty-420 11 месяцев назад
If they say it’s so safe then why don’t they just keep it and not release it into the ocean and plus they never asked anyone for their opinion they just announced that they were doing it no matter what
@sen-jingflagburn
@sen-jingflagburn 11 месяцев назад
Japan can do whatever it wants.😜😜
@sushiya_jp
@sushiya_jp 11 месяцев назад
It's a simple story. Because there is not enough storage tank. If you save at this pace, it will be full next year.
@person880
@person880 11 месяцев назад
They did ask others for their opinions, including the IAEA. Even Korea reviewed their plan and said that it is acceptable. Just because you have difficulty reading and listening doesn't mean that what you claimed is true.
@Astaunchcommunistfighter
@Astaunchcommunistfighter Год назад
So why isn't it in Japan's daily water supply?
@AlCatSplat
@AlCatSplat Год назад
You didn't watch the video, I'm assuming.
@chee-liekho5860
@chee-liekho5860 11 месяцев назад
The "expert" did not discuss the multiplication factor up the food chain which was not studied at all. Tritium get incorporated into the organic of algaes. These algaes get ineaten by small fish or crustaceans etc which are eaten by bigger fish etc. As it goes up the food chain the radioactivity multiplies. This effect, whether happened or not, can only be known in a few to ten years of study. cannonly be known
@maradon385
@maradon385 Год назад
Please distribute the water to all major oceans like Atlantic, Mediterranean, Arctic, Antarctica, etc to ensure equitable distribution.
@nemolai7989
@nemolai7989 Год назад
@@user-yf1pd4gc7k it will actually circle back to hit indonesia, philiphines, taiwan and china first
@nemolai7989
@nemolai7989 Год назад
so that nobody can ever eat any type of ocean product, that equality!
@Liquidbae
@Liquidbae 11 месяцев назад
Water evaporate then falls as rain, man, IT WILL GET ON OUR SKIN
@Liquidbae
@Liquidbae 11 месяцев назад
@@nemolai7989classic, Japan never drop its ambitions after WW2.
@sushiya_jp
@sushiya_jp 11 месяцев назад
If you bear the cost, I agree.
@ttguitar1
@ttguitar1 2 года назад
You can't make it safe
@AlCatSplat
@AlCatSplat Год назад
Yes you can.
@goldsilvervscrisiscollapse4320
@goldsilvervscrisiscollapse4320 2 года назад
...so we're supposed to trust the same plant owners who literally said that radiation levels were low because they had used measuring devices that topped out at a far lower level than the actual radiation levels? The guys who were told early on of the risk of tsunami in causing this very problem, but went ahead anyway? The guys who supposedly can be bothered to filter out radioactive elements, but allowed radioactive water to seep into the ground water table for years? The guys who proposed freezing an underground water shield which i knew would never work and which never worked?? Now they're LITERALLY admitting they cant do anything else other than dump all the radioactive water into the ocean because they have no ideas left?
@CatatonicImperfect
@CatatonicImperfect 2 года назад
no you're supposed to trust the experts, not your gut feeling
@lv3184
@lv3184 2 года назад
The whole process will not only be overseen by Japan’s new Nuclear Regulatory Agency, but also by the International Atomic Energy Agency, which is an independent UN body. So if you don’t trust the Japanese government you can go by the UN data. You’re also misinformed on what’s happening at the plant. The ice wall was actually very successful. It has cut the amount of contaminated water that has to be pumped out from the reactors by 75%, from 400 tons a day to around 100 tons a day. No one ever expected it to reduce that number to zero. And if it weren’t for the ice wall, they would have run out of space to store the water years ago and the releases would have already started.
@peter3756
@peter3756 2 года назад
I think there are much more urgent nuclear waste problems at nuke-test sites, high-level radioactive materials ('plutonium' chunks) leaching out into the Ocean? Have they compared the amount of tritium release from other nations around the globe and high-level radioactive materials seeping out of nuclear bomb test sites? Other countries such as France, UK, Canada, S. Korea, etc, release far higher concentration of tritium each year into the ocean and the air for decades from their nuclear power plants, For example, Seoul, South Korea, has several times higher environmental radiation reading than that of Tokyo. China's claims are also (knowingly/intentionally) false. China's notorious for being a major polluter of water, soil and air, censoring all scientific reports that sound negative. IAEA has approved the release of the Fukushima water. What S. Korean and Chinese are claiming make no sense. It is apparent from this that they have been knowingly making false claims solely to bash Japanese.
@CKSiu88
@CKSiu88 11 месяцев назад
WHERE IS GRETA THUNBERG?
@user-cx8jo7oq4f
@user-cx8jo7oq4f 11 месяцев назад
The Japanese official Weibo accounct posted a blog announcing that the treated nuclear waste water has minor effect to human body: 1/70K ~ 1/1M higher than a person annually have. So, if the treatment is truely this effective, then why not pouring it to the Japan water cycling system? And why the politicians refuse to drink it?
@latyaz
@latyaz 2 года назад
It’s official guys, Guardian is toeing the line?
@josephburchanowski4636
@josephburchanowski4636 2 года назад
Whose line are they toeing?
@whatspp7203
@whatspp7203 2 года назад
➕➀➈➁➈➃➇⓪➂⓪➂➁...🤝Thanks for watching Send a direct message right away ❤....
@figgettit
@figgettit Год назад
@@josephburchanowski4636 USA.
@kkwang1121
@kkwang1121 2 года назад
If ur guys think 1’s radiation is not a great thing in water. But fish eating each other and radiation will accumulate in bio-chain
@ForbiddTV
@ForbiddTV Год назад
All fish in every ocean has been radioactive since the beginning of time.
@ssszzszs
@ssszzszs 11 месяцев назад
Why don't the Japanese drink nuclear wastewater?😅
@Star-lv1gk
@Star-lv1gk Год назад
If it's so safe, why don't they use it for their fields?
@user-bi8ko7kc6h
@user-bi8ko7kc6h Год назад
Okay, if it is safe to drink why the Japanese gov don’t let Japanese people drink it? Why release drinkable water to ocean?
@AlCatSplat
@AlCatSplat Год назад
Why do you care?
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
希釈って知ってるか?Chinese
@person880
@person880 11 месяцев назад
It's not drinkable water. It is salt water from the ocean. They said the tritium levels are reduced to below levels that are safe for drinking. They are talking about the radioactive levels being safe for consumption. The water itself is ocean water stored in steel tanks that are not made to hold drinking water. Please use your brain a little bit. It is ocean water.
@shaf60
@shaf60 2 года назад
You drink it . 🍺
@XyzAbc-gm7jj
@XyzAbc-gm7jj 2 года назад
Is not about magnitude or if other nuclear plant as well! It is about that why are we dumping trash into the ocean!
@anxiousearth680
@anxiousearth680 2 года назад
It's water. With tritium, which is just an isotope of hydrogen and is already present in the sea due to formation in the atmosphere from cosmic rays.
@shengchuangfeng227
@shengchuangfeng227 11 месяцев назад
The United States-based National Association of Marine Laboratories-an organization with more than a hundred member labs in the U.S. or U.S. territories-released a statement opposing the wastewater release plan. It cited “a lack of adequate and accurate scientific data supporting Japan’s assertion of safety.” The discharges, the statement said, may threaten the “largest continuous body of water on the planet, containing the greatest biomass of organisms … including 70 percent of the world’s fisheries.”
@manruu
@manruu 11 месяцев назад
Regarding Japanese seafood, Japanese cosmetics, and Japanese snacks and drinks will not be purchased again, it's not just the fear of radiation. It is also a silent rebellion. Japan should not be destroying nature and harming the health of people in other countries. 💔
@sen-jingflagburn
@sen-jingflagburn 11 месяцев назад
Japan is more precious than you~
@CorralSummer
@CorralSummer 11 месяцев назад
They're not. Or at least, not with this water. Unfortunately since Fukushima Japan has relied more on fossil fuels and that's harming people, but hardly unique to Japan.
@manruu
@manruu 11 месяцев назад
I see. Well, you drink a lot of nuclear waste water. Come on.@@sen-jingflagburn
@Batchat2352
@Batchat2352 11 месяцев назад
You think governments don’t harm the health of their people in purpose alreAdy?
@frankC-we6ql
@frankC-we6ql 11 месяцев назад
Water is flowing, and in the end the whole world will be affected
@llw2606
@llw2606 11 месяцев назад
Pretty soon, Godzilla will be born near Japan.
@user-lv3yt2lc3d
@user-lv3yt2lc3d 11 месяцев назад
The ocean is not Japan's trash can!
@Gathering_the_magic
@Gathering_the_magic Год назад
If it’s safe why dump it in the ocean? Water the plants with it
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
希釈って知ってる?
@user-qf9ub1er3z
@user-qf9ub1er3z 2 года назад
I want every royal family of japen and japen politician to drink a cup of radioactive water before we dump it into the sea
@anxiousearth680
@anxiousearth680 Год назад
Yasuhiro Sonoda. Look it up.
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
Isn't the royal family politicians? Is your head okay? The Japanese royal family is the oldest existing dynasty in the world.
@wodemoshou
@wodemoshou 11 месяцев назад
US: we found cure for cancer! Japan: nice, we are safe to release nuclear water now.
@yihanchen2448
@yihanchen2448 Год назад
I have to say, as a Chinese, I hope that United States could throw all the nuclear bomb to Japan in 1945.
@AlCatSplat
@AlCatSplat Год назад
cope
@user-mh6qm1yj9r
@user-mh6qm1yj9r Год назад
🇨🇳🟰🇰🇵🇷🇺🎉🎉🎉🎉
@googleuser6440
@googleuser6440 2 года назад
Why don't they just evaporate the water?
@anxiousearth680
@anxiousearth680 Год назад
That's actually one of the solutions the IAEA brought forth. But it doesn't really make a difference. Basically, tritium displaces normal hydrogen in water, making it a part of it. So evaporating it also evaporates tritium rather than leave it behind. For more info look up, IAEA Fukushima Daiichi Water Discharge.
@user-eq7nq2vm5o
@user-eq7nq2vm5o Год назад
I think Japanese officials take a sip of this water themselves and pour it into the ocean
@emilyg1056
@emilyg1056 11 месяцев назад
"Biomagnification" refers to the process in which toxic or persistent chemicals gradually accumulate within the bodies of organisms in a food chain. These substances are often introduced into the environment from pollution sources, and as lower-level organisms are consumed by higher-level carnivores, the concentration of toxic substances increases. Despite tritium levels potentially meeting international standards in Japan's nuclear wastewater, there remains a potential risk of biomagnification, where toxic substances accumulate in higher-level organisms, potentially exceeding initial environmental concentrations and affecting humans, particularly at the top of the food chain.
@seasong7655
@seasong7655 2 года назад
Isn't the tritium needed in fusion research? They might want to sell it instead!
@beaudavis3808
@beaudavis3808 2 года назад
Nice idea.
@lv3184
@lv3184 2 года назад
Tritium is also used in other applications such as in radioluminescent paint that is used in watches, gauges and emergency exit signs. If you have a watch that glows green in the dark, thats actually tritium. But tritium is produced either by removing it from the cooling water of heavy water reactors, where it exists in high concentrations, or by irradiating certain lithium isotopes in a nuclear reactor. Removing low concentrations of tritium from light water such as the water at fukushima is much to technically challenging and therefore way to expensive.
@shukrantpatil
@shukrantpatil 2 года назад
where do you think we get the tritium from for nuclear powerplants and research ? we get it from the ocean .
@augustlandmesser1520
@augustlandmesser1520 Год назад
@@lv3184 It's the Radium in watches - as Radium Girls. You're right about the technical challenges and astronomical expenses of Tritium extraction.
@augustlandmesser1520
@augustlandmesser1520 Год назад
@@shukrantpatil no we don't.
Далее
Is Fukushima's Radioactive Water Safe?
21:15
Просмотров 1,2 млн
best way out of the labyrinth🌀🗝️🔝
00:17
Просмотров 935 тыс.
На фейсконтроле 💂
09:41
Просмотров 718 тыс.
The internet isn't as fast as it used to be
12:46
Просмотров 239 тыс.
Why Is It So Hard to Stop Meltdowns?
13:37
Просмотров 779 тыс.
Why the US Banned Cleaning the Ocean Shocked the World
14:35
This could become the most radioactive place on earth
13:31
The Clever Way to Count Tanks - Numberphile
16:45
Просмотров 697 тыс.
How North Korea Finally Made It Impossible to Escape
26:35
What Fukushima's Nuclear Exclusion Zone is Like Today
12:55
Why The Windows Phone Failed
24:08
Просмотров 238 тыс.