@@mishaproduction many UEFI firmwares support a technology called CSM (sometimes also referred as Legacy boot), which emulates a BIOS and is thus capable of booting BIOS dependant operating systems
I have done something similar about multibooting.I installed Windows 98 which supports FAT32 but installed on C drive which uses FAT16,then installed NT4.0 on D,then use the Windows 98 bulit-in convert tool converts the C drive to FAT32. After that,the machine failed to boot up due to FAT32 is not supported,but after replace the bootloader with the Windows 2000 one,both system can be booted normally. You can see some interesting result after booting NT4.0. 1.The partition tool don't know which is the boot drive. 2.Some installer program may not function properly due to the C drive is unavaliable,and the Windows 2000 installer still errors even with third party FAT32 support being patched into the OS.
@@patrickjn Windows 7 in fact has partial compatibility with UEFI firmware and GPT partition scheme. A pro of it is performance improves a lot when you use it. But a con of it is if you crack it, known cracking softwares like Windows Loader won't work.
My desktop PC (real hardware) has Windows 7 SP1, Windows 7 build 6801, Windows 7 build 6730, Windows Server 2008(VIsta), Windows Vista Beta 2, Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004, Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005, Windows 95, Windows 3.1, MS-DOS 6.2 on one HDD
Operating systems in this video: Windows NT 4.0 Windows 2000 Windows XP Windows Vista Windows 7 Windows 8 Windows 8.1 Windows 10 Windows 11 Click here and comment which is the best and which is the worst.
i had a laptop that came with Windows vista that i got to dual boot windows 7, windows 8, and windows 11. (btw i want to someday have a computer that can dual boot Windows XP, Windows 2000, and Windows 7.)
With the right hardware, every single one, with official drivers & all exept for NT 4.0 I think, combo would be any any G45 motherboard with socket 775 and a TPM header, a decent Core 2 Quad to have a good experience in stock windows 11, a good graphics card compatible with XP and up (for previous windows versions just use the G45's GPU, drivers go all the way back to windows 98 probably works on 95 too with some patches, a TPM 2.0 module for the motherboard, one floppy reader, 1 or 2 IDE drives for windows versions prior to XP, one Sata drive for windows XP and up, a cd rom drive to install older OSes, and enough patience to source each part and install all the OSes.
26 windows 14 linux 20 others with refind + grub file manager + clover without creating multipat partition. Installing os in vhd and booting directly feom grub file manager ...
What partition style do you have used while creating partition. Is it GPT or MBR? Also which software you use to create bootable USB. Is it Rufus or winsetupfromusb or some other? Which mode do you boot from. Is it legacy or UEFI?
You can multi-boot Linux as much as you want as long as you fit within the requirements. Same thing with this video. You'll just need a LOT of storage space, that's all...
Actually Windows 2k can boot NT 3.xx without any problem but Windows XP can't boot under than NT4 SP6. The problem isn't too much ram nor Win 2k boot. Problem is logical partitions. NT 3.xx can't recognize newly logical partitions and crashs. 0x0000007b means hard-disk boot problems. The solution is use only primary partitions or use different HDD for Windows NT 3.xx with only primary partitions.
@Kernel NT But in my PC i can dual-boot with Win2k boot into WinNT3.xx. If u still not believe, i can upload video to my channel. Because I didnt use logical partition.
can you tell me my windows 2000 is not working right now so we installed windows 2000 the next is windows xp and so if i add hard disk it will get blue screen of death cuz they are working for scsi and ide, and we can't dualboot windows 2000 and xp for ide
@@smd89xx Yes i used patchmem for Windows 98 and ME. For Windows 95, i edited system.ini. Windows 98 and ME saw 2GB RAM but in Windows 95 only saw 900MB RAM.
@Kernel NT I installed DOS-Based OSes at second hard disk. Old NT OSes in first disk. And modern OSes in third disk. İf u ask me how u installed old OSes in SATA mode, luckily i found compatible drivers. So im not lying.
2:31 on surface laptop 3 and pro 6 (only ones ive confirmed are like this) windows 8 wont run. though i was able to get windows server 2012 R2 with no explorer.exe running
