Your guest Ms. Aarati Krishnan has really done some good maths and explained it in a logical manner with good data back up. Her approach is also very sincere and focussed. Thanks to her.
In a high inflation country like India, it is very difficult to save enough to make a corpus where a withdrawal rate of 4 percent will see us through. The government needs to be responsible about bringing down it's expense, if it wants to bring down inflation
Retirement becomes truly fulfilling when you posses two essential elements: ample financial resources and a meaningful purpose in life. Make prudent investment choices to secure goof returns and ensure a comfortable retirement.
Rising prices have affected my intention of retiring at 62, working part-time, and building my savings. I'm worried about whether individuals who weathered the 2008 financial crisis found it less challenging than my current situation. The stock market's volatility, coupled with a reduced income, is making me anxious about having enough for retirement
You should contribute to your retirement diligently, or better still look into financial planning don't come to youtube for advise, consult a Local or trusted online broker/ planner
Very true, I find myself lucky enough exposed to money management at an early age. Worked full time when I was 19, purchased first home at 28 fact forward timo I'm 57 now not laid off
This is huge! would love to grow my reserve regardless of the economy situation, my 407k has lost everything accrued since early 2019, at this point, i'm in need of guidance, can you point me?
A noticeable omission I observed in the discussion is the mention of annuity plans along with FD and SWP instruments, which are gaining popularity. Even though these two products generally fall under debt or equity, comparing them with bank FDs or mutual funds would have been more meaningful.
They are assuming future willbe like past. With population decline and realestate excess supply and Ai .. we can live more affordably than even today due to more supplyand aging population after 2 to 3 decades..like italy snd Swisscities
@@jishnu18 Who told you that plots give you 5-6%. I have 3 plots in Bengaluru and they have given me 10 to 13% return. That is over a period of 10 years. In urban areas including tier 2 and tier 3 cities plots are giving 10% returns at least
Stop giving inflated numbers. Stop frightening people. Nobody needs 46 lakhs per year to survive. It is more than enough for at least 5 years for abretired person.
Manoji what she is saying is absolutely correct. Just think 30 years back the monthly expenses used to be 3000 or 4000, but now you require 40000 to 50000 per month
@@JustChill76an average mid age person salary in early 90s is nothing less than 7000 rs per month. Inflation for basic necessities highly exaggerated in our country
@@JustChill76it’s even lesser. High salary 30 years back used to be ₹3-4K. And expenses were only ₹1.5k for good living. It’s now ₹40k. So it’s 27 times up now. 27x in 30 years
The first sentence itself is a myth. No government servant today who joined in last 20 years has any assured pension. They will have annuity out of their own NPS savings and that too will remain fixed and will not increase each year with inflation. So if someone gets 1000 rupees/month as NPS tier 1 pension. It's value will become less than Rs 500 after 10 years and less than Rs 250 after 20 years in to retirement. Most government employees still live in this illusion of pension and some are not saving enough beyond their NPS contribution.
But NPS I guess is 25 percentage of their salary. Am I right? Which is a big percentage and nps of 25 to 30 years I guess will make a big corpus. But I agree that they need to think beyond nps and invest in other instruments as well
@@gouthamkondapavuluru1959 It is not true for first-generation NPS people like me. Due to UPA mismanagement, the contribution was only 10 % + 10 % until NDA increased it to 10 % +14 % in 2018 they realized there is not much corpus. In addition, UPA didn't invest the accumulated money until 2009. NPS is good for government employees who join in their twenties so they have some time for compounding. But for people who join in their thirties, there is a problem. The XIRR is rarely above 9 % anyways due to the large gilt proportion.
@@gouthamkondapavuluru1959 No. For government employees, it is strictly not allowed. There are four choices: 1. Default Scheme - Investments would be done in defaults schemes of LIC, UTI and SBI in a predefined proportion which is 15 (equity): 85 (debt) throughout the career. 2. Scheme G - 100% of the contribution shall be invested in Government Bonds and related instruments. 3. Scheme LC 50 - Life cycle fund where the Cap to Equity investments is 50% of the total asset. You can google the age-wise ratio. But for age 40 the equity is 40 and debt is 60 and then the equity proportion goes down. 4. Scheme LC 25 - Life cycle fund where the Cap to Equity investments is 25% of the total asset (at any age). Unfortunately, most people choose the default option out of financial ignorance (including me) until it's too late. On top of that the equity is managed very badly so the returns are not that good (worse than Nifty 50 index).
Global Withdrawal rate of 4% comes from Trinity Research. This rule states that if you withdraw 4% of your portfolio yearly, you can sustain your withdrawals for 30 years.
If you assume your expenses are 50x12'per annum a corpus of 1.5 crb is sufficient at age sixty.Invest fifty lacs in nifty fifty which is going to give you returns of 9 percent over time......rest in debt which will be you around six percent post tax.( to the extent of inflation). Surplus to be reinvested invested in equity/ debt equaly)
how this female has done calculation of 8 cr in FD. If a person just lives on interest amount & also save in that it can definitely do wonders.That at fd interest at 7.2% is 4 lakh 80 thousand per month. I think she is incorrect
I don't get this. IF you had 6-7 crores today that got you 7% in FD, wouldn't you be able to save at least 50-60% of the return of 42-49 Lakhs even after affording a pretty decent lifestyle in most metros? This savings in turn if invested in simple index funds SIP should be a considerable corpus in 10-12 yrs even assuming a 10% CAGR!! e.g. A simple 80K SIP p.m. will be 6.12 crores at a 10% CAGR!! She completely overlooked this part and is only talking about how inflation will make the 49 lakhs smaller with time!! Why are these *experts* making such simplistic mistakes in almost every video I wonder!!😀
@@csrcaesar if ur saving 60% of 7%, your corpus will grow 4.2% which means it will lag inflation by 3-4%, which is a 60% reduction in 30 years. Note that with time your savings rate will shrink because you won't be able to save as much, so the lag rate will grow too... Abhi bhi nahi samjha toh kal subah samjhata hu, filhaal thoda khud bhi soch lo
@pb25193 I don't think you even understood my first comment nor have a clue what you are talking. I'm talking about the scenario where the person has 7 crores TODAY!! Even a risk free return should fetch them 42 lakhs p.a.!! More than enough to have a comfortable life in any metro and save 50% for continued investment. Which will clock another 6-7 crores in the next decade! She completely ignores this and is scare mongering clueless investors.
Again I don't think the inflation rate will go down to 2-2.50 percent in nearby future. As a highly populated country and being large number of poor, low income group people our major gains from taxation etc is consumed in walfare schemes of poorer and also it is justified. Secondly corruption at various levels plays the major role in fixing the prices. Availability of food grains etc may lower down due to climate change, policies being not favourable to farmers etc.
