Could not have said it any better - even if an incredibly poor air-force, say the Russian Air-Force, will at some point hit something, even by accident or by total surprise - its like the comparison made in 'Black hawk Down' about 1 NATO solider being worth 100 naughties - the SEAL said it only takes one bullet to kill, never under-estimate your enemy my worry is that morons in our governments controlling spending will look to cut-funding due to no credible enemy - we may see some advanced projects taking longer to come out as funding to spread into other areas - then we get a big shock when an exisiting enemy starts playing with toys in advance of ours in the late 80's an advanced AI project in **** was put on hold due to waiting tech advances and no enemy had anything to worry us - move ahead 7 years, research individuals had moved on, mil advisors had changed and we started the entire research programme again from the start - a massive cost - i remember looking at looking at tech reports from tech providers either i had written or had seen before and we where being asked to pay again for them - with all the same old research questions being asked and then money being spent to re-answer them - it was a very frustrating time as they did the same put it off to later again
let's just take a second to appreciate the fact that this video is illustrated with footage of the actual subject being discussed. What a refreshing change from all the videos I see with just random, vaguely related images.
Too fucking right mate. I absolutely despise all those kinds of videos with just unrelated footage running in the background of a talking session. There's quite a few of them that are massively popular for whatever reason.
I have to be the Canadian here: there are a LOT of apartment blocks, and buildings in Russia...and, on paper, quite a few jets. So they actually suck at flying into buildings too, though arguments can be made about training for crashing has increased...by quite a bit...but generally it ends up a single class, and very much on a pass/fail side of training. 🤣 😂
@DC C sometimes I feel like the Russian military is like my first car back in Highschool...like sometimes its just fine, and then when you have a date, you get surprised when the only thing that works is the ejection seat, and even that was 50/50 gamble.
- You’re previous flying experience? - Da, I flew paper airplane - Da, good. Dat is good, you’re assigned to Su-34. You’re expected to be ready for first mission next week, da?
Early on, in the first days of the war, there was an interview with a Ukrainian fighter pilot. He said that they were lucky as they had gone to a Red Flag exercise and gotten to fly with the USAF and study tactics with them He and his wingmen took to the sky early on with four of them intercepting a dozen inbound Russian aircraft. His comment was, "they taught us YOU MUST BE BRAVE" and they turned into the Russian formation and scattered them.
This is what happens when you are trained competently by seasoned instructors. You get good information that can make the difference between life and death.
@@srijanme bahahaha you Ukraine started off with barely 5% of the fighters Russia had & they were ALL older generations of Russian versions. Russia has lost a whole lot more, of more advanced fighters, than Ukraine has
Astronaut Mark Kelly, as a Navy pilot, was involved in pilot exchanges with the Soviets way back when. He said he was shocked by how inept the Soviets were, regardless of the air frame they were flying.
I've never talked to a pilot but I have talked to several tankers over the years that had hands on experience with supposed front line and top of the line tanks. Most were just blown away at how bad they were. At how bad the conditions were. The Russians were just soooo proud of their armored shit boxes. And honestly they felt sorry for the conditions more than anything.
@@dimesonhiseyes9134 Absolutely. They saw what happened in Desert Storm with the tanks they sold to Iraq. We rolled over them as if they were nothing. Granted, training is a big issue as well, but to be so absolutely "proud" and confident in what they have and what they do with it is astounding.
Mark Kelly has an identical twin astronaut brother, Scott Kelly! Scott spent a year on the ISS so they could compare & do scientific tests on the differences in the brothers on his return. The Kelly brothers are excellent pilots!
I was trained as a Naval Flight Officer (NFO) in the US Navy. The first step is primary which includes both classroom and on hands flying with an instructor as well as grounds training to learn each part of the airplane. I trained with a T-34 turboprop. I learned maneuvers. Sometimes I almost threw up doing banking at 90 degrees or going upside down like an Immelman. If I didn't right, the instructor would tell me to do it again. I would almost throw up. That training took almost six months. Sometimes the training would be delayed because we were in the pan handle of Florida where storms are frequent. I would sit hours in the ready room waiting for my flight to commence only to find out it would have to be cancelled until the next open spot. Then secondary is all about navigation. I would have to make charts ahead of time noting turn points to which direction, calculating amount of fuel needed. The instructor picks the destination. While in flight, I needed to calculate distance traveled based on land marks that I used on my map. I would have a helmet fire keeping up looking at the ground and my map. I would need to give updates and then announce the turn. I failed out of secondary because of three failed flights. It wasn't all bad. I got transferred to submarines which was I really wanted in the first place. Needs of the Navy as they said so they assigned me to NFO because it was what was needed. I didn't even put in selection of three choices. I had just barely learned to drive a car when I was enlisted as my family couldn't afford one after finishing going to drivers ed in high school. That was four year before I joined the Navy.
@Steve It wasn't all bad. One of my instructors would pick an airport I needed to navigate to. This was the deep south. After landing, we would get lunch at a local bbq restaurant (slow cooked pork ribs with the meat falling off the bones, corn cooked on the grill, homemade mash potatoes from real potatoes and the skin still there instead of powder,) before flyiyng back to base.
@Steve Here's a more detailed explanation about US submarine officer training. It's years long. First one has to go to six months of nuclear power school, three months working at a nuclear plant. In the plant, one would have a qual book with signatures needs for each watch station once you completed a six hour watch and the watchstander observed me doing the tasks in the qual book. After graduation, I had to stand watch again with the watchstander to sign off on all the tasks in the qualification book. There would also be drills both when docked and at sea. This is so the officer would know exactly what each watchstander do. There was also be drills in maneuvering with an electrical operator monitoring a huge panel, a reactor operator who watches all the readouts for the nuclear plant, and a throtteman controlling the steam going to the large propeller. When there was a training drill, the engineering officer while in maneuvering, would recite the calls necessary based on the procedure book. The enlisted engineering watch supervisor would come to maneuvering with recommendations. As EOOW (engineering officer of the watch), I had to tour the spaces every two hours for the six hour watch. I was relieved by the EWS every two hours so I could tour the engineroom. There's no bathrooms in the engineroom, so we would use funnels that would feed directly to the septic tank. If I can get an officer for number two, I would call forward for another officer to relieve me from forward. We do a turn over. Since we regular keep logs of what happened on watch, he would review those as well. These logs are handwritten with date and time for any event that might be significant. I would rush forward and come back after doing a break down of what happened if anything happened on watch when I left.
@Steve There are fire or flooding drills which cause the captain to order an emergency blow. There tanks with water/air up in the forward part of the ship apart from the living quarters. If an incident occur then the CO would call for an emergency blow. This takes up the submarine (called boat because it has one propeller. Submariners are proud of that and do not want their sub be called a ship). I remember running back aft for a fire drill and I was running. I saw this old master chief carefully holding on to the railing as he walked. The next thing I knew I slipped and fell on my butt; sliding down.
@Steve For pipes, US submarines would cladding which are solft insulation about an inch thick to prevent loss of heat and also minimize noise that can be detected. A fun thing submarines would submariner's family on tour of the forward part of the sub. The Engineroom is off limits to anyone but the crew. Another fun thing the sub would do is take the families out for a cruise beneat the surface. Since this was in Hawaii, depth would go down to below 1k feet just a mile off the coast. The CO would then order angles and dangles. The sub would dive at around 20-30 downs and back up slowly. Parents would let their children slide down on the long floor and the submarines would perform the procedure. This was also training for the crew. One final thing was the emergency blow. Submarines are stabilized by large air tanks in the front end. If somehow the submarine lose propulsion or sinking, all the air would be let out simultanously. Suddenly the sub would rock up out of the water partially and land back down.
This should remind us how much culture and individual values play into the effectiveness of any military. The attitudes and the culture of the people who operate them really does matter, a lesson both Russia and Ukraine are demonstrating right before our eyes, and one America can't afford to neglect - no matter how advanced our weapons or systems become.
But hey, the Russians are Very good at showing off their jets (akin to the Blue Angels in the US) at Red Square propaganda events! That's gotta count for Something, right? lol
Our military is one of the best because of the camaraderie, unity, and pride we have. The technology is just an added bonus. SEALs have been shot out of the sky by RPGs in Afghanistan, "Black Hawk Down" is still very fresh in our minds, it's not like we don't know.
Alex - never be afraid of providing context - those who have western military training understand the usefulness of said context. The two episodes provide a stark look at Russian capabilities, and just how outclassed they are when compared with western military forces. IMO, it would be even worse of a bloodbath if NATO forces were fighting their Russian military counterparts.
Collided ??? the prop is fully covered by the tail fins impossible to strike without ramming the entire drone there was something we were not shown perhaps a second fuel dump that caught the prop full force the fighter definitely didn't collide with it the usual US propaganda as for poorly trained Pilots the US holds the record for that often killing friendly troops or civilians just ask the Brits or Canadians how many US pilots have killed.
Hey numb nuts UKR 150 to 200,000 dead 400,000 wounded 35,000 MIA 8300 Mercs not to mention those executed by the UKR SBU for fleeing plenty of UKR video of them grabbing boys off the street to fight Russia is playing with them like a cat with a mouse. As for the mighty west too frightened to get involved even Israelistan cant believe the carnage Russia is inflicting its beyond anything all of NATO is capable of and they're shit scared they're bleeding them out. A few hasty attacks by Russia pushed back they don't hold ground for the sake of holding it they let Ukrainian troops die doing that.
I wasn't bored with the first episode talking about the Russian Aerospace Force. I found it to be just as informative and important as this one. If they wish to get better, as a warfare branch period, they need to rewrite their playbook.
Hi Alex, I really enjoy and appreciate your detailed analysis of the subject you present. It's not biased or weighted in any respect. You look at both sides of subject matter and report accordingly. I have learnt a lot from your presentations. Thank you.
THE AMERICANS ARE ALWAYS TRYING TO UNDERMINE THE RUSSIANS--NOTICED THAT THE RUSSIANS PLACE NO SUCH EMPHASIS ON CRITICIZING ANYTHING ABOUT THE AMERICANS-- SO, that should tell you all you need to know about the Americans' concerns with the capabilities and the strength of the Russians-Thats because the Americans grew up hearing that they are the best at everything because they are the greatest country on earth, so you can't be surprised by they always finding faults with others
Hearing the state of the electronics in the Russian aircraft makes me wonder what state are their nukes in? As I've learned, if it's happening in one area, it's probably happening in others. Great reporting on this and thanks for doing it.
Their probably doing the best out of all of the branches as they didn't get as badly damaged during the 90's say like the Russian navy... but still that's a relatively low bar.
@@Davethreshold Well that’s the rub. Many of the higher-ups thought the rest of their military was in reliable condition too. The people stealing parts and not doing maintenance aren’t telling anyone about it. They just assume that they’re entitled to their piece of the action, and that it won’t make a difference if they just do this one little thing. But when the whole military thinks that, it’s a huge issue. I seriously doubt the missile branch is immune from the Russian military culture of theft and deceit. And even if everyone working on and around those nukes were 100% honest and hardworking, Russia just doesn’t have the budget to maintain a nuclear stockpile that large. Think of it this way. The US and Russia have similarly-sized nuclear arsenals. The US spends more on maintaining its nuclear arsenal each year than Russia spends on its entire military (and that’s before you consider that half of Russia’s military budget is stolen). That tells you all you need to know.
Poor training among Russian military pilots? Yet two US military helicopters collided during maneuver exercises killing all on board both aircraft this week 🤡🤡🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣
Go back to WWII and read/listen to the media talking about how poor Soviet equipment was, how badly trained their soldiers were, how low their morale was.
Considering how this war has made Perun a star on RU-vid, I'm going to say that hearing you lay out all your research in detail - with the same clear and concise presentation and just a little humor - is fantastic. Feel free to dive into the weeds more, been loving it!
You shouldn't need to apologize for the previous video; context is king, and provides your audience with some solid empirical fact before getting into what might otherwise be editorial (not necessarily editorial, but at least more subjective areas of discussion). More people that discuss these kinds of topics should be so inclined.
Man I'm so happy I found this channel a bit ago, I love how you paint the full picture and go into details about all the context. I really feel like you strive to be as unbias as possible, and I love that. Thank you
How competent is the Russian Air Force SYRIA in 2 months they destroyed Americas ISIS they flew more combat missions with 30 aircraft rotating pilots than Israelistan and its allies did in 2 years the west literally shit its pants because they know their aircraft cant rack up those sort of combat hours.
I think another thing to consider when talking about the failure of ground crews to properly prepare a particular aircraft for combat operations, is the fact that these maintainers arent even in deployed conditions. A large swath of these aircraft are operating from home bases.
Russian concept of aircraft as extended artillery is a key chunk of information. Russians are having trouble with paradigm shift across the board, not just aircraft, and the really troubling thing is that these problems seem to have systemic roots.
Also add that against aerial targets they are extended SAM systems. A-A combat isn't taught beyond simple intercepts and offensive BFM (i.e., they don't practice defense). That's based on a legacy of Soviet control and preventing pilot initiative and/or defections.
@Aqua Fyre the A-10 didn’t go in until air supremacy was established which requires SEAD, bombing runways hangars and ammo dumps, those missions were carried out by F-111s, Tornados, Strike eagles, Hornets, Intruders,Tomcats, and F-15s. Using aircraft as extended range artillery only works if your enemy doesn’t have air defences
I am a auto mechanic. At time 17:21 there is a wheel bearing that has the hardening flaking off. How do you wear out a aircraft wheel bearing. On a car it takes at least 100,000 miles to do that.
I can think of a few reasons . 1 - the plane is flying high where the air is cold , grease is congealed , the tire goes from stationary to 200 mph almost instantaneously 2 - weight . A plane is many times the weight of a car , but they want to save weight on all things such as wheel bearings 3-shock load , the shock weight on a hard landing could be many times the static weight
"Russia didn't expect this to become a protracted war." Absolutely spot on. This simple line answers just about every question joe public has about this pointless war. It rings just as true for the ground forces also. Add in Ukrainian resilience and commitment and you have your answer as to why Russia is still a stones throw from Donetsk airport airfield boundary.
From what I have heard and seen the Ukrainian military gave the Russians who went there a huge ass-kicking. They sent some of their best troops there and they had heavy casualties.
@@classifiedlonerider590 No I'm not. The Russians tried to capture and airfield early on and they were repelled twice and took heavy casualties both times. The soldiers they sent in were supposed to be their best and the got their asses kicked twice. You're the one who is getting bad information if anything.
Very cool that the novel Red Storm Rising predicted Russia having problems with friendly fire in the air even when it was written over three decades ago.
I have always wondered how much the civilian aviation culture in the United States contributes to the military aviation culture. In the U.S. it is super common / possible for some teenager to have at least flown, if not gotten their private pilots license, prior to applying to the military. A lot of military pilots likly own their own planes, or at least fly when off-duty. I find it hard to believe the "best and the brightest" of russia are being selected by much more than "the richest and well connected" standards. Supposedly, even in the infantry, bribes are how promotions are done. So, how much does it really cost to become a pilot in Russia?
I do not know, but I would not bet on Russian aviator culture beeing that much diffrent than in the USA or many other countries. The Russian helicopter pilot that defected to Ukraine, and turned over the Russian atack helicopter, in the end of summer, described that one of the things he had to leave behind in Russia, was his own small civilian airplane. A plane he in turn had inherited from his father or uncle or something.
Just watched Perun’s video on Ukrainian vs. Russian air fighting, and it shows how little content there is on it on YT. So, thanks for your insight and videos!
Fantastic as usual. The myriad problems facing the RU Air Force have still not been broadly discussed, thank you for making a two part breakdown of the issues!
How competent is the Russian Air Force SYRIA in 2 months they destroyed Americas ISIS they flew more combat missions with 30 aircraft rotating pilots than Israelistan and its allies did in 2 years the west literally shit its pants because they know their aircraft cant rack up those sort of combat hours.
The kaleidoscope of problems in the Russian military is now out there for all the world to see and military leaders and think tanks are going over all of the information that is being gathered extremely thoroughly. I bet there is a group in every single NATO country just dedicated to anything and everything coming out of Ukraine and that is all their job is. And I bet every single NATO country wants to get their hands on that radar jamming equipment Ukraine captured some time ago so they can crawl all over and in it to see how it works and how to counter it.
Somewhat related: My friend Igor has been in the Russian Air Force as a Mi-24 pilot since 1992. He has been deployed to Chechnya, Georgia and Ukraine. He has also somehow managed to get shot down in Chechnya, Georgia and Ukraine. For some reason, they keep letting him in helicopters
The reason are obvious: 1. It costs money to train a replacement 2. Russians are stupid 3. He may very well BE the sharpest knife in the drawer 4. Russians are stupid 5. They love a good dead hero more than just about everything else 6. Russians are stupid 7. Did I mention that Russians are stupid? That is practically an infinitely truncated list. I could EASILY come up with 50 occurrences from this war, that are available on video, to back that up. Here are a few. A Russian tank cruising down the road with its gun trained to port, that sweeps the ENTIRE contingent of Russians clean off of the tank going in the other direction. Russian tanks, many, many Russian tanks, bending guns against pretty much any road hazard obstacle you can name, buildings, trees, other vehicles, etc. How about two Russian tanks demolished by mines, with barely enough room to squeeze another tank through, which some tank commander attempts, and you guessed it, now THREE Russian tanks, demolished by mines, within 8 feet of one another. That was just tanks, and only a few examples, getting the picture yet? If not, sticking with vehicles, how about the Russian BMP that is flying down the road, looking much like an Indian train, with guys COVERING the top, that runs off the road, then back on, then flips, with now screaming (at the top of their lungs, the ones that are still alive) Russians pinned underneath. Or how about Vulhdehar, where Russians have tried to cross a mined field hundreds of times now, on foot and with vehicles, with EVERY one of them dead and destroyed on the field, at which point they send out a mine sweeper. Wait for it ... which is now sitting destroyed in that mine field. They did this over MONTHS, literally gaining not ONE INCH of ground, and the guy driving all this, Putin personally gives him a promotion. You CANNOT make this crap up. Russians are stupid. Oh yeah, and this is true. If you'd started a snail, traveling 0.03 mph (which is basically a snail in turbo mode) at the Eastern line at the start of this war, he would now be 200 miles ahead of the Russians, and gaining ground at, yupper, 0.03 mph. The Russians have now been working on Bakhmut for about 8 months. They have gained half of that small city, so far, that works out to about a block a month. It is NOT a large city. And when the Wagnerites tried to plant the flag on the govt building, which they FINALLY got to, guess what, it exploded, killing all of them. This was after TENS of buildings coming into that city had already done exactly that.
I'm not sure if it should count as friendly fire but.....in the first Gulf War, a B-52 was hit by a HARM missle fired from a friendly Wild Weasel. It's believed that the B-52 gunner lit up the radar on his tail gun right as the missile came off the rail. So, in true military fashion, that B-52 was renamed "In Harm's Way".
Thanks Alex, You made a really good point here that doesn't get enough consideration when people compare the military strength of various nations. The US, and their western allies, and not just in relation to air force capabilities, are professional to the point that they make their potential opponents look pedestrian. I think the US military and their allies must be looking at the performance of the Russians in Ukraine and be feeling pretty good about themselves. Slava Ukraini.
Hey numb nuts UKR 150 to 200,000 dead 400,000 wounded 35,000 MIA 8300 Mercs not to mention those executed by the UKR SBU for fleeing plenty of UKR video of them grabbing boys off the street to fight Russia is playing with them like a cat with a mouse. As for the mighty west too frightened to get involved even Israelistan cant believe the carnage Russia is inflicting its beyond anything all of NATO is capable of and they're shit scared they're bleeding them out. A few hasty attacks by Russia pushed back they don't hold ground for the sake of holding it they let Ukrainian troops die doing that.
How competent is the Russian Air Force SYRIA in 2 months they destroyed Americas ISIS they flew more combat missions with 30 aircraft rotating pilots than Israelistan and its allies did in 2 years the west literally shit its pants because they know their aircraft cant rack up those sort of combat hours.
Yes, they compare Russia winning over Ukraine, despite the tens of billion USD worth or armaments, and US army performances in Afghanistan where they were kicked out by a bunch of guys with Kalashnikovs and slippers. Pride, indeed. They must feel so good about themselves.
The Russian Air Force, has never really fully understood the concept" of train like you fight, fight like you train"the Air Force runs red-flag three to four times a year, depending on availability of aircraft and funding, as well as green flag exercises, to train the support elements for squadrons under combat conditions You are seeing pilots from multiple squadrons, multiple Nations, with dissimilar aircraft all learning how to train and fight, and survive as a team, and when they finish, take the lessons learned back to their original squadrons, and teach the same., By applying the methods learned, on a much smaller scale.
Pilots or Instructors from other countries should be banned and made illegal in providing training to Çhina, Russia, Iran, NK and any other countries supporting them. Any training provided should be considered high treason. ✌️
Damn, I thought this was a clickbait channel when I read the title of the video, but damn was I wrong. From start to finish was straight up on topic and informative. Instant sub. 💪💪💪
During WWII and in Korea Russian pilots were the product of "survival of the fittest." The two guidelines of Russian military are "Quantity has a quality all it's own" and "Engineer things to be good enough." That worked until they robbed their own resources to build personal wealth and decided that thier pilots could get along with the old French WWI maxim "Eclat and Elan" would make up for spending It didn't then either
I always thought Russian pilots would be as well trained as ours. I knew they wouldn't have large scale flying experience as ours but thought they would be experts at their own planes. Can you do same analysis of Chinese with exceptions they aren't in conflicts as of yet but would come in first contact against Taiwan then our pilots
@@randybutternub031 China was as bad as Russia but trying to change it for the last two decades. They changed their training program. China also rips all the Russian avionics from their aircraft to replace them with modern Chinese avionics.
@@bastadimastaChina has a similar issue to Russia, but it's even more engrained in their culture. That is the culture of "saving face", which means never admitting failures or problems. When it comes to training and testing you want to fail, but cause that means you pushed the limit and learn from it.
It has been well-reported for a long time that Russian pilots don’t get sufficient training hours to be competent. Not even close. China does get its pilots sufficient hours, but lacks the training infrastructure and experience of Western air forces. It also doesn’t have any allies with competent and experienced air forces which it can use for exercises, such as Red Flag, etc. It has been reported in some circles that China has been getting their pilots even more hours than Western countries, but even if that is true, it might not be that beneficial. There is a point of diminishing returns with flight hours, and even adverse consequences from too many flight hours. Pilots have to stay proficient at a lot of other things besides just flying, and if you fly too much, you can’t stay proficient at those things, and you still have to have a little down time to maintain sanity. You also have to be careful not to put too many hours on your aircraft, which can drastically reduce their service lives. The US has tried to strike a balance that allows pilots to stay sharp, but not to wear out themselves or their aircraft.
Really good analysis! I am thinking of how effective our pilot training program was in WWII vs. the Imperial Japanese method of concentrating on producing a small force of elite expert pilots who ultimately were mostly lost by mid-war.
Remember, the Japanese made the classic mistake of thinking the war would be over relatively quickly, and decided in their favor as soon as they cowed America into submission through their snake, err, sorry I mean sneak, attack on Pearl Harbor. And for such a mission, only a small force of elite expert pilots were all that would be needed.
@@user-ng5vt7he6d What in the hell was that? Dude just typed a whole bunch of idiocy in a single comment without providing any facts at all about how "we" would not be prepared for "what's coming". Using "Top Gun" as an example as why we wouldn't be ready? Likely zero military experience whatsoever and his only logic is from Hollywood movies. Silly normally I wouldn't comment but give me a break man. 🤣👎
@Aqua Fyre > with an adversary of equal strength Even if any of that were true, the US Military abhors a fair fight. We have the capabilities to make sure those don't happen, so a 1v1 dogfight means something has gone wrong.
@Aqua Fyre From what I understand most U.S. fighter training is to destroy the enemy aircraft from "over the horizon", before they even know you are there!
PLEASE do a comprehensive review of the Chinese Communist pilots and aircraft. Then get someone to do a comprehensive review of the Chinese Communist army.
To be fair,. As for friendly fire, Ukraine and Russia use the same types of aircraft, which makes ID much more difficult. Both use Su-27, MiG-29 and Su-25 variants for instance. In the Gulf war apart from a few exceptions the coalition and Iraq used different types of aircraft.
Alex I wish I could write a critique, but do not have a background to comment. I rely on the better qualified. What I can say is Thank you for the work and dedication in producing these informative videos. They go a long way in understanding. Tom.
The Battle of the Philippine Sea in World War II vividly demonstrated what happens when poorly trained pilots are thrust into combat. It was called the Great Marianas Turkey Shoot. The Japanese squadrons didn't stand a hope in hell against Task Force 58 pilots. They ran into a well-organised air defence manned by both veteran pilots and fully trained replacements who had drilled in combat techniques for a year. The Japanese pilots who sortied in that battle by contrast were green recruits with only marginal training, in an air fleet denuded by the loss of its veterans through the previous two years. It was a slaughter.
Can you do a video on exactly what a "radar signature" is? I've heard experienced operators can determine the type of aircraft from radar returns (w/o IFF) and EC systems can "fake" the signature of other aircraft. How does that work, in-depth?
Think of it like a "laugh signature" for a person, some are rapid, some slow, some high pitched, some belly laughs, some with snorts, others wheezy, some loud, others nearly silent. With good 'ears' you can make out even minor differences and easily tell who's laugh you're hearing and identify them. Sonar works the same way to classify ships/subs by unique signature of the sound profile they emit, and are able to tell one submarine from another even when they are in the same class simply by unique aspects of that particular individual boat. Both of those are passive identification methods. You said 'radar returns' as in if you were blasting out radar and listening to the returns, in which case they can identify craft by such things as detecting how many blades are at the front of the the other plane's jet engine, and how many engines are on the aircraft, combine that with the size of the radar return, the distance to the craft, and the craft's heading (so you know what aspect of the plane you're getting a return from) and you have an idea of how large the plane is by how strong of a return you get. Basically they listen to and blast aircraft with radar from every angle and turn the unique aspects into a 'profile' and that's in the software of the radar and when it detects something that matches an onboard known profile with some confidence level it will indicate on the display what type of aircraft the radar believes is being detected.
NCTR... Non Cooperative Target Recognition has been around since the 1980's. msytdc painted a perfect picture. Radars are so good now, with high speed digital processing, they can detect very specific "fuzz" or noise within a return (that was perhaps previously filtered out) to be able to ID distant aircraft.
It takes 4 years to train a military pilot. The elimination of experienced Japanese pilots in WW II caused the Japanese to rely on Kamikaze pilots who only knew how to take off.
Have you considered releasing these in a podcast form as well? Other channels do that, and it seems to work well. Also gives people like me who like listening to audio while at work and such another avenue without having to directly download the audio every time.
If the pilots being used most often on the front lines are more qualified and experienced, why are they getting shot down so much? Shouldn't they be better at NOT getting shot down?
Alex I love your videos. Last weeks maybe some might find it slow but the amount of REAL information and insight is incredible. So wanted to thank you. I think obviously not getting the proper training or experience isn’t doing them any favors but when thinking of conflicts like desert storm or maybe Serbia most likely those pilots are not flying anymore. Yes I’m sure there are some still training the new generation but there probably isn’t to many left. The thing is WE learned from these conflicts not only the pilots but our Air Force has learned and we’ve had these experiences. Looking back at Russia they really don’t have any recent (to my knowledge) conflicts dealing with real air to air or surface to air fights. We’ve learned so much from Vietnam, raids on Libya desert storm, Serbia, Iraq again that over time if we’ve suffered the same losses in let’s say as we did in Vietnam then obviously we’d be doing something wrong. I think the lack of knowledge or experience then being trained by pilots who might be great aviators but ends up not meaning much when someone is shooting at you. I’m sure it’s a pilot to pilot case but I can’t help but think not having these experiences doesn’t help.
Well... before this invasion I thought that Russians learn something from their previous blunders and that military was the only thing functional in their country.
So you understand. Russia has claimed friendly fire downing because they don't want the world to know how easy it was to shoot down some of their most advanced jets.
Having been Air Defense and in the unit responsible for downing the USN F-18 and the UK Tornado (After the incidents not during), those were the result of several failures happening at once. With the F-18, they were outside of established corridors and happened to be travelling at similar enough speed and altitude, that the radar classified it as a completely different threat. Similar with the Tornado, thought it's IFF was supposedly not working. ON TOP OF THAT, at the time PATRIOT systems were used in Automated mode, where the effectively fire at anything that meets certain parameters, and then also fails an IFF check. After the F-18 shoot down, PATRIOT batteries were only allowed to operate in Manual mode, though by that point Iraqi scuds weren't nearly as much of a threat so that didn't become a problem. It's also worth noting that around that time in OIF, there had been around 40,000 sorties flown over Iraq, so for only two of those sorties to end as a result of friendly fire is proof at how much more effective western training and tactics are.
When looking at your expertly made video about ruZki airfarce it all just reminds me of their air operations against Finland in 1939-1940 & 1941-1944. Finland was fighting with mostly aged second and third rate aircraft against russkies with very high loss to kill ratio. Even so in the final two years when newest russki fighters were accompanied by american airacobras p-39 and reportedly some p-63's. High level of Finnish pilots and organization against the age old russki logic of mongol hordes.
The material you present is very well explain especially having you read what needs to be read, I commute so I listen to your program I can't be reading all that material while driving, thank you
You may well be right about Russian pilots, have no idea. Of interest though didn't the US lose 10,000 aircraft (helicopter and fixed wing) in the Vietnam War? How was their training? The Russians lost about 500 in their Afghanistan War. Regardless if things keep escalating we may soon see western pilots and planes over Ukraine, let's see what happens when the rubber actually hits the road...
The 1987 F-14 shootdown of an F-4 was not really "friendly fire" as we use the term. There was no actual conflict occurring, the jets were involved in an exercise and nobody should have fired any live ordnance period. The F-14 engaged the F-4 as part of the exercise, all legit so far, but the pilot then inexplicably fired a real missile. There shouldn't have been any fire period, friendly or otherwise... the whole thing was actually rather bizarre (there are videos about it). A better example of US blue-on-blue was the 1994 shootdown of two blackhawks over Iraq by a flight of F-15's.
Both episodes have been excellent. The more information you give me, the better. It helps me form the best opinion that I can. In my shortened opinion on this particular conflict, even though Russia can severely outgun Ukraine, with the help of other nations, Ukraine will end up pushing Russia out of their country. It will probably take a while depending on how much aid is given to them militarily. Russia is going to run out of experienced troops to fight this war. They have the ability to pull from other highly militarized parts of their country but that would be a grave error. Of course, Putin could lose his shit and start firing tactical nukes which would start a much more interesting story.
I'm a bit curious where you got the 300 lost planes from. Oryx lists 78 confirmed fixed wing losses. while yes they have probably lost more than that I'm skeptical about 500% the visually confirmed losses. If for example Russian tank losses are 500% of Oryxs losses then Russia is currently operating negative 4000 tanks.
I concur, if it came from US Government sources I would sadly not trust it as I once would have. They have lied about so many things over the past few years (probably longer), that you can’t trust them or the talking heads in the mainstream media that just regurgitate what Joe’s minders tell them. Meanwhile we continue to send billions of dollars to line the pockets of Zelensky and his cronies while children are now being sent to die for a cause that only Zelensky and NATO want to continue. Ok, rant over…good video by the way!
@@voidtempering8700 Probably so. Neither side has been able to operate many aircraft in the other’s airspace (or even near it) due to the SAM threat. A good number of Ukraine’s aircraft losses came in the initial missile strikes, but once they were dispersed, they have been used judiciously and have suffered much slower attrition than one would expect. Russia has been mostly using them to launch missiles from outside Ukraine. It’s probably hard to get an accurate count of drones shot down since so many are very small and short ranged, but I’m guessing this figure probably includes the larger drones from both sides. It probably didn’t include things like the Phoenix anti-armor drones or the Iranian anti-civilian drones.
Total props for referencing the GOAT of long form podcasting, Dan Carlin. The sheer ineptitude on the part of the Russians revealed here is mind blowing.
Always love your reporting. Very informative and well researched. I’ve learned so much from watching your videos on military news and opinions. One thing i noticed in comparison of Russian pilots versus NATO pilots specifically US aviators is Russian pilots seems not to wear G-suits when they fly. It looks like they wear regular blue jump suits that loose compared to US pilots that have additional suits over their jump suits. Is this a correct observation? Keep on rockin! Thanks!
