How Russia built a stealth jet to beat the west - Su-57 

It’s been used, and has been the suspect for shootings down many SU24 recently, these are the only plane that can carry the shadow strike cruise missiles. What ever plane shooting this down, it hasn’t been detected yet

Actually he was used on Kiev attacks a couple times . Even in few Ukrainian Telegram videos show a noice of his engines and were recorded by regular people. They don't sound like standard russian engines at all. It has a more high pitch . Now this is something I heard personally at videos at same night Russians said they use it.

I believe a few fired off some missiles well at a safe distance. It was far enough away from the front so that it would be almost impossible to shoot them down. So as far as we know they may have just been used as flying missile trucks.

It's not even categorized as a stealth fighter, only the media calls it that. I think NATO would categorize it as a reduced visibility fighter. And it's still made with the Soviet cold war (and US fighter mafia) doctrine. Optimised for dogfighting over bvr. Everyone else had realised by the 70s that dogfights were on the way out, and long range missiles were the future. Russia has caught up with their missile tech, but their planes are all obsolete. If they ever get rid of their cleptocrats, they're going to have to start from scratch and play catch up.

@@aleksandarjevremovic1028 But it is a standard Russian engine that is being used on other Russian aircraft. The engine that it is supposed to have has not yet been developed and deployed. So I seriously doubt the stories. Also, Ukraine has proven pretty good at shooting down every other type of aircraft that Russia has used over Ukraine (or very near to Ukraine). I don't believe the Russian Military would use the SU-57 in Ukraine as it would be a total PR disaster if Ukraine shoots one down (not to mention the loss of intelligence on the aircraft and it's electronics from the recovered wreckage which would soon be in US hands).

Спроси у украинцев сколько раз су57 их обстреливал !

Hmm i smell Belkan Air Force dominate

to think about it, i think i use the ADFX-01 way too much...

@@namenotfound614 >

@@biwarayoganata me when the snow starts falling

Remarkably many people don’t feel the need to appeal to a higher authority when they can use their own intellect, ability to research and critical thinking to be able to arrive at sound conclusions.

True...

acquired from CNN LOL

@@mynameisnobody211Most people understand just how little they know about this.

Haha my man i love the sarcasm.. “ yeah that radar cross section is the size of my balls”!😂😂

And a F- in performance

@austinteal3645 Fly against it. Prove it. Otherwise I do not believe in western wunderwaffels, like the indestructible Challenger 2 or Mega-Leopards.

@@austinteal3645bruh

@@hercegovac9999 w pfp

Except for those giant engine nozzles sticking out the back giving a great radar return and lighting up every IR scope that is not directly in front of them. The F-35 has one of those and that's bad enough let alone two of them. The Raptor on the other hand has two extremely powerful engines with hidden square exhaust ports that at least minimizes radar return.

The exposed bolts too, lmao

Ah, a fellow Habitual Linecrosser enjoyer

One day, hopefully the kid will get his chance.

Hellow fellow linecrosser. 😂

Lol it says translate to English ​@@someopinionateddirt6561

Nice reference

a clever comment indeed

Warhorse

You right

but on the contrary US built the racehorse for war applications which is biting their own back, like the operations cost for F22 and F35 which led to the discontinuation of F22 production because the US coudn't bear the cost of operating both the aircraft at the same time, moreover they've built an aircraft which they thought it would solve the problem but on the way they've created more problems for their own mainly for maintaining and operating cost for both of the planes, That's why US is considering to upgrade the Bloc levels of F16 as mainly the F16 serves more purpose than those of what F35 does maybe rather more efficiently, that's why they've proposed to update F16 for future warfare, moreover just to save cost and maybe more frugal for the airforce even Russian's are also considering to operate single engine aircraft for future applications, like SU75 checkmate, So there is an overall shift in airforce around the world to use more single engine craft for their workhorse purpose overall, since US is also instead of investing more in F35 for future warfare they're trying to shift all the future upgrades to the new F16 programs overall,

What successor? Is there any info on it?

When function and form go hand in hand

Well the SU-57 lacks lethality because you know, it's the size of a city block.

It doesn't matter if you built the least stealthy, stealth figher ever, all that matters is that it looks cool as hell. People in the West will be scared of it! 😂😂😂 And the US Congress will pour even more tax dollars into the MIC! LMAO 🤣🤣🤣

It is a beautiful plane, but it’s a bunch of BS. It has nothing on Western stealth tech.

​@@chaosXP3RTgood, that way the rusians can have their cool planes and the US can have functional weapons

Same principle why Red Navy goes with the All submarine force? ;)

because they don't fucking fly it in combat!

​@@Thornbloom nuh uh

@@JS-bk7bt yuh uh lmao, the su-57 is in the same boat as the t-14.

@@Ripa-Moramee nuh uh the su57 flew in the air battle of my toes hurt

Problably

ouf that hurts XD... but i can't disagree

Coming tomorrow,

Russia 101: Can't do shit, talk shit. See SU-75 Femboi

@@meteorknight999 Its not about ego, its about facts, but hey man, keep beating your chest about a plane that doesn't really exist.

They can barely build the drones they bought from Iran

@@thadiusbarnelsnatch3665 I'm only discussing the merits of the concept, not Russia's ability to execute on it.

@@pseudotasuki ok well in that I can agree, you may not have known that one of the upcoming f-35 upgrade packages includes drone wingmen

@@thadiusbarnelsnatch3665 Indeed! Hopefully it'll go better than the Russian counterparts.

@@pseudotasuki I’m hearing that we’ll have real concrete info on it within the year

Yep. Gotta get people so mad they click unfortunately

@@FoundAndExplainedwell played I came to flame you but now I applaud you.

@@FoundAndExplained no issues, the algorithm is king, have to please the red triangle overlords with clicks or lose it all

@@FoundAndExplained pretty based

@@FoundAndExplained you gonna do the mbb lampyridae

You forgot the best part about the Su-57's infrared sensor: it's not coated, which means using it makes it substantially more detectable on radar lol

@@gigacream5830 "It's insane how it is capable of basically being dumped from the mount, and INSTANTLY flip a 180 and fly the complete opposite direction..." Mmmhhmm, and do you know where the idea for that came from? Soviet missiles.

@@gigacream5830 "Idk where tf you got that idea from" Maybe you should read up better on reality then. The R-73 together with HMD has that ability, though with reduced hitrate. There's even videos online showing it. The export model of the missile AND the HMD does NOT have the ability.

​@@thundercactusIR sensor can be turned around with the sensor's back facing forwards when not used to increase stealth

@@RCLepcha I know. But it can't be USED without compromising stealth, unlike the F35's various targeting sensors that don't compromise stealth at all when in use.

It look really good but i dont really like the colours

Military aviation expert over here with all the facts and completely proven claims! Geez

you’re,so right it’s a beauty..i just don’t believe in it’s performance capability

It doesn't matter if you built the least stealthy, stealth figher ever, all that matters is that it looks cool as hell. People in the West will be scared of it! 😂😂😂 And the US Congress will pour even more tax dollars into the MIC! LMAO 🤣🤣🤣

@@jevongraham5223 Those big honkin exhaust pipes sticking out the back is a pretty good clue as to its stealthiness it would be toast before it even got into visual range of an F22 or F35 but i must admit it does look kinda cool.

@@bobdillon1138 Yeah I got bored one day and read up about jets again. The exhaust looks archaic, cant hide from the radar with those rounded bazookas.

Russian, just know how to build beautiful planes

It can beat a f22 because the f22 wont want to shoot it down because it looks fire as hell

agreed. the russian design philosophy makes me think of a ballerina with an AKS, they look great, even sexy, but also rugged and deadly

Lmao yes…building things that look like they were born with fetal alcohol syndrome is beautiful, especially when the engines protrude so much and are so far apart it looks like it rides the special bus

Behold... Salty yankees incoming lol supper funny that they cannot stand other countries making something that looks cooler

When people say it's "problematic" or "buggy", they just do not understand the problems with being cutting edge - or the fact that problems can be resolved. The Gripen is easy to maintain because they are optimizing older, very well understood technology. The F-35 and the F-22 are the cutting edge and the first of their kind. Novel issues will arise, period. And nobody else will have solved them. But the do get solved. In the time Russia has built 12 SU-57s, the F-35 has already upgraded it's capabilities several times too. By the time the SU-57 is optimistically in full production, the 6th Gens will be rolling out.

@@recoil53 It was more than this - Russian boasting is not just boasting, they are trying to compete in the arms market. So with their highly motivated and huge (but surprisingly inefficient) fake news industry, a lot of the ‘problems’ with the F-35 are politically motivated. Add in conspiracy theorists in the west and the ‘reformers’ like Pierre Spray (RIP) a lot of noise was made about the F-35 that wasn’t really honest. The Indians have been badly burned by their crush on all things Russian military, which is why they dropped out of paying for the Felon. I’m no fighter pilot but when I see multiple interviews of pilots who have flown the teen series for years and some of them even moved to the F-35 saying that they’d rather be in the F-35 than any other plane, I believe them. Many are now retired and have no fish to fry pushing the F-35 and are hugely nostalgic for the planes they flew but all say the F-35 is near perfect for its role. Also, that the Russians are developing something to match Link-16, a 30-40 year old NATO technology should tell you everything. Modern conflict benefits from the same stuff that has benefited industry and communications over the last generation. Networking is a huge force multiplier - it doesn’t matter how agile a plane is if it’s facing adversaries with situational awareness light years ahead of them. Russians are dangerous, but mostly because they don’t value human life. Even their own. But we have all come to see that their high tech is not particularly high, is stolen or relies entirely on components bought from their ‘enemies’. Experience has also shown that American systems are better than published specs but Russian ones are often considerably worse. They just lie. It’s a matter of time before it all comes crashing down. The sooner the better.

​@@julianmorrisco America only attacks small third world countries. The last time America attacked a country with a strong air defense was during the Vietnam War. In Vietnam, America lost thousands of airplanes and helicopters.

@@slawawacker Yeah. In 12 years, 60 years ago. You lot are doing your best to top that in 5, today!

F-35 gets orders due to US pressure, not all the time, but it is a big part of it.

You're so close. Russia's best planes would get curb stomped by the stuff the US made in the 1980s.

*USA: builds something cool China: builds something to compete Russia: can’t actually build anything

@@team3am149 u accidentally put Russia instead of India blud 🗿

😂😂😂

@@walker2345😂

Theorizing is not for you. Look at high resolution images of serial production Su-57. And YES! India wrenched Russian timelines for Su-57, but it didn’t stop them. Now! They are begging again to purchase the plane.

@@jakovskaro8224 Maybe theorizing is not for me, but wishful thinking is certainly for you. India is begging so much that they are purchasing French Rafale instead. I also looked at high resolution photos, and i can still see through the air intakes, so I don't understand what you are trying to say. The Su-57 is a beautiful plane, but Sukhoi itself claims a radar cross section of 1-0.01 m2. I assume they know for sure what their aircraft is capable of. American planes can do what? A 100 times less? Unfortunately. I'm rooting for the Russians, I wish America had a good big strong counterforce, but unfortunately this plane falls short compared to the western ones.

@@erikpeterffy7552 well! I stay by my initial assessment. You know very little

@@jakovskaro8224 well India isn't begging again they already signed for su 57 when it gets completed, the matter of fact is USA flew their F35 , FA18 And 21 in aero India airshow FOR SALE purpose and they ended up with Rafael as France offered better weapon system than FA 18 and Rafael performed better at high altitude in Himalayan mountains just to let you know that war scenario is totally different in specific Himalayan mountains atmosphere and plain desert like middle east and we already have fought and won a war at that altitude without machines , and about f35 (We dropped the idea of f35 after south Korea half of f35 fleet was not able to fly due to high maintenance failure issues which i am not sure why everyone in west is trying to ignore about)our choice was su 57 because we needed a solid aircraft not a sophisticated one reason even the more water exposure can damage a beautiful aircraft like raptor and 35. Just some spoiler (India operates S400 RUSSIAN and even after that USA wants to have f35 stationed on our Himalayan air strips that thing is itself is sus , cuz last time a NATO country imported Russian s300 it was excluded out of F35 programmed. USA in every 6 months comes to train with us at that high altitude warzone every wondered ? the only aircraft f-15 of US was able to be on par with mig29 in those mountains cuz at that area its the game of altitude. There's a lot going on with f35's recently (only the countries with US influence buy those and their maintenance record is 100% Sussy). Su 57 is also no good but at the moment the only so called 5th generation aircraft who have faced a engagement and war is su 57 pinning down a Ukrainian su 27. (summary is stop shitting and start appreciating) cuz every place is not middle east , Stealth is not something that's a priority in harsh conditions like Indian Warzones here the humans and the reliable machines work.(if you think US machines are reliable bro trust me you are either blind or dumb cuz we operate 7-8 different style of fighters according to the requirements and none of them is US made cuz it was never able to stand the conditions).

@@jakovskaro8224 ohh and if you think i am shitting on any of the aircraft then you are wrong , every Aircraft has its purpose to serve and its made with keeping the condition of place it would serve. We have mirage for bombings , rafael for air superiority, mig 29 for aircraft carrier and high altitude and lastly Sukhoi SU 30 mki that beautiful flanker is the most advance flanker of SU 30 model cuz it only Russian by airframe whole DNA of that plane is rebuilt. (We Indians are little bit bias towards our friend Russia cuz he was the one who was supporting our back and scared the US 7th fleet away with their Nuclear submarine fleet ) And we have tested Russian weapons they are definitely trust worthy. Lastly as in war there is no use of advance weapons if you cant use them because the the country making them censor you lol avg US game. "US might be better But Russia is the one whom you can trust that will not sabotage"

For sure

Def cooler then the f22.

take account of numbers built and well, it's embarrassing

​@@gerardw.7468 since you brought that up, take into account the president of the US which is way more embarrassing

@@son9012atleast our president doesn’t need a body double or a bunker to hide out in

It's a gen 4.5 fighter struggling into production when gen 6 fighters are already cooking on the other side of the pond

The SU-57 is 10 feet longer AND wider than both of those fighters, and carries a full weapon loadout internally.

@@jordanp4987 and?

@@AugmentedGravity and no one of mentioned above fly without huge tanks and other external load. Their real rcs is huge like a house

​@@serheyyavotsky1246By the time the enemy sees the F-35 dressed for long range strike operations, they've already been fired on by the ones in full stealth mode. The SU-57 Femboy can't jettison its engines nor the woodscrews holding its 4th gen corpse together which will light it up like a Christmas tree on advanced radar systems

😂😂😂

Can you name any oligarch from Russia?

@@birchwot6979 well you may work for Oleg D, or Potanin, but I guess you're not bottling for Putin's former best butt-boi Yevgeny because his plane magically transformed into a cloud of aluminium chaff. And he can't sign your check anymore. Good luck in your next role comrade.

@@birchwot6979 Abramovich, Putin, Usmanov. What do I win?

​@@birchwot6979you think Russia is a democracy. That's adorable

RCS of a zeppelin. And people wonder why they have made literally zero foreign sales while the F35 is the hottest fighter on the market.

This is one of those “if you know, you know” punchlines that I love.

People are right about production issues but Russia has learned many lessons from this war and Sukhoi will deliver double the number of Su-57 this year than previous one and all will have the new engine and other upgrades installed.This project was so slow because Russians didn't expect to get into any hot wars against an enemy with a lot of air defense.

Exactly!

You such a patriot ain't you,

@@onkabetserathari8084 I'm just thinking straight and logically. I analyze based on the current Russian technological capabilities.

😂

real

tom cruise is a smart man

It's saddening that so many of our American citizens get their supposed facts from movies, video games and the media, then spread those supposed facts around as being factual without any PROOF whatsoever😔 It's cool to root for your home team, but if your home team hasn't proven to be the BEST besides talking about what they can do, then it's dumb to brag about what you've been TOLD💥😵

Hollywood miracle 🤣🤣🤣🤣

The US is on the verge of bankruptcy or at least interest rates going much higher and into double digits, the US borrowed a lot of money to make that technology and pretty much only used it to destroy Iraq and a few other places. If you think inflation is over then you are deluded unless they cut spending and that will cause a lot of problems with your military spending.

Sounds like something someone who's never seen the production version would say

@@alexdunphy3716 second series production version still uses square panels and still doesnt have ram paint

@@Estuardomendez13 how do you know it doesnt have ram paint. it clearly is painted

everywhere the same copy and pasted arguments. westoids are all npcs unable to think for themselves. f-22 has riveted panels all over fuselage as well. y'all can literally check the photos

Video games. 😂

0:56 That is a video game?? What's the name of the game then?

@@Simeon301091 The SU-57 first flew in 2010 and has been in the Russian air force since the end of 2020. In all that time, they have produced a grand total of.... 32 (10 test, 22 production aircraft). We have 187 F-22 Raptors and we've already built over 1,000 of the F-35 in various models for our own use and for exportation with countless more on the way. At the rate they're going, we'll have retired the F-22 and replaced it in similar numbers with 6th gen aircraft before the SU-57 ever breaks 100 in production models and there will be enough F-35s flying around to become the 3rd largest air force on Earth by themselves.

​@@imapopo2924 32 might be higher than the real number, isn't it closer to 23? 10 test 13 production? And yeah, russias economy is a little sad tbh

@@helpmedaddyjesus7099 I just pulled the number of Wikipedia. I'm surprised it's even that high. For all I know, you may be right

which is just a claim, there could be many more than we think, no, their economy handling it or not they can always pull some sh1t up from their asses@@imapopo2924

@@Simeon301091 I figured that you would be smart enough to realize that I was talking about the Su-57 but I guess not.

It was actually carrying the model code "S-32" and "S-37" (note there is no "u") before becoming the "Su-47". Same case as the "Su-57" being the "T-50" prior.

@@keso_de_bola1750 oh ok thanks. Also based erusean profile pic

@@keso_de_bola1750 oh ok. Thank you random Erusean citizen

Later Models seem to have fixed that seems like the rivets was only on Prototypes and demo models which is still super weird.

T50 not Su57

Those panels were supposed to be removed for analysis during testing. The aircraft stealth skinning is the last thing perfected during the final stages of production for any stealth aircraft.

True..especially the western tin cans...

Ah yes, the "high-vis" colors like... black and grey. As opposed to the "low-vis" eye-fuckingly orange canopy of F-22

@@TheByQQ the gold canopy is a special coating to reduce radar signature. Oh, and you forgot the blue and the bright white on the F(ucking horrible)elon.

@@patmahomesisthegoat1622 Blue and white are... "high-vis" on the sky? Have you ever went outside?

@@TheByQQ smh you get my point. Keep believing your daddy’s (Putin) propaganda bud

Russia already has a bunch of more than capable challengers to the US planes: Su-30SM/SM2, Su-35S, MiG-31, MiG-35.

​@@Sevastopol91 the su 57 is meant to be an upgrade to the su 35 flanker but it's a bit too expensive

@@cideltacommand7169 It's not "too expensive" it's the engines, the only thing holding the aircraft back is that the engines are not made or ready. Once that's done they can produce them. Coincidentally, the Armata platform has the same issue, that being the Engines.

Вот когда будет, тогда поговорим про 6 поколение.

@@samgold9881 When SU-57 became a 5th gen then we will make comparisons with the Americans

The only way this thing is killing a raptor is by shooting at the actual birds

You might know where the sun is at noon, but I dare you stare right at it. You can't! I'm joking of course. Mostly... Russia is a chump in any game that requires finesse and tech.

hey now! if those russki fanboys could read, they'd be very upset

Do you actually do any research? Just spewing the same thing

@@SEYI-SEAN what's your complaint exactly? Or are you just spewing the same ol "do your research" crap with no actual complaint? I'm not insulting, I am truly asking.

​@@michaelhowell2326exposed rivets were on the T-50 pre serial ones only, now im no felon fan but it seems to be pretty common word that its just on every airframe

When did it crash.

Isn't F-22 also have a crash log

​@@MoskusMoskiferus1611No, that's F-35.

@@MoskusMoskiferus1611 yeah, it the same amount of su57 crashes, but there’s around 1k f35 and 10 su57 and su57 still has the same amount of crashes with little aircraft

the raptor cant be killed it dosent fight it sits its ass down in an hangar

Theres nothing good about the F-16, it was always a cut price shopping trolly to fill out Airforce numbers right from the begining, fine if your bombing sandle wearers in a desert somewhere but wait until it comes up against something other than that, theres a reason most nations around Oz use F-18s or F-15s

no this is a worthy competitor to the Wright Flyer over 100 years later. An F-16 is way out of it's league. a balsawood glider could probably shoot this crap down

Even a su27 is too much for the f16 kid

Ok, the f16 might be better than the su57 at air to ground, but have you considered air to air?

@@helpmedaddyjesus7099 su57 have good air to ground arament and carry as much as the f16 and it have targeting pod too

Maybe they would if they weren't broke.

We didnt see f22 nither f35 in compat Atleast the su57 got 2 record kills of the longest air to air kills in history in 2023 agaisnt su27 and su24

@@ali-haider5788 No country with the F-22/F-35 has fought a near peer conflict since their introduction. Using them on sandpeople in afghanistan would obviously have been overkill. *>"su57 got 2 record kills of the longest air to air kills in history in 2023 agaisnt su27 and su24"* Literally pure fiction, zero evidence theyve been used in Ukraine in any capacity.

@@ali-haider5788 false. These claims are entirely made up by Russian trolls online. The only credible information we have of the Su-57's use in Ukraine is launching cruise missiles to attack ground targets, most likely from Russian airspace. The F-22 and F-35 have both seen far more action than that

​​@@baronvonslambert small problems with the definitions here are that "stealth" most likely isn't defined, and having MAWS, 5(maybe 6) radars, an IRST and multiple radar bands to scan with isn't counted as advanced integrated avionics? What would count then? Honest question.

Show a source

@@baronvonslambert It's getting new engines this year which will make it a 5th gen.

They already have a 6th gen aircraft that is more stealthy than the f-22 and f-35 imagine whats an 6th gen jet capable of.

@@harrishromero6447 well that’s not yet proven, we haven’t seen it yet😜

@@felixtorres6512 b-21 raider is a 6th gen aircraft

@@harrishromero6447 and am glad that technology is on our side, question is, have you heard of it being in service yet?

@@felixtorres6512 in production

Cope Harder. In real life exercises many fourth gen fighters have been able to attain a lock on so one can only guess how overblown the hype is.

@@kathibaba7665proof?

@@kathibaba7665And how often does that happen, and under what circumstances?

​@@kathibaba7665 You cope harder. These exercises are dog fight exercises, where planes can see each other. It's different than combat at 20km range. Just a tip: Stop reading the titles and actually look into articles

@@Mr_Topek How cute! You call managing to close the gap successfully and resulting in dogfights to be completely dogfight only exercises.

F-4 was the best US fighter ever same jet in AF and Navy. And a majestic war record. Today US use kinda 5 different fighters for roles F-4 did alone.

Mig21 solo

bud those 5 all do those roles way beter@@aleksandarjevremovic1028

...not the f4@@lukaswot6851

Mig-21 was designed by Mikoyan-Gurevich… not Sukhoi. Furthermore… what does that even have to do with the SU-57?

Raptor has never even seen combat

@DiabloGamingLTD Yes it has, it was involved in airstrikes in Syria, and was apart of the US Air Force kicking Wagner’s ass during the battle of Khasham.

@@DSKENTERPRISELTD neither has the Su-57. The raptor doesn’t need to see combat to prove its capabilities. We’re talking about a plane that was developed by Lockheed Martin. A company renowned for repeatedly developing ground breaking aircraft spanning back to the 1930’s lol that name alone has enough weight behind it to know that plane is either gonna do what they say it can do or more than they say it can do. I’m not saying the Su-57 is something to take lightly buddy but it’s not competing with the F-22.

​@@DSKENTERPRISELTDso you're implying that the su57 was seen in combat outside of shooting missiles at orphanages in Ukraine.

@@WocketInMyPocket_ su57 was deployed to Syria for testing and did air to ground missions not spot but some and are you speaking about the same company that made the F35 that keeps falling out of the skies and they had to stop production also that same company the made the F35 that was detected my a 1960 radar and hit by a s200 missle in in Syria 😂😂😂😂

source

@@neferpoyaz4037 the dod

@@neferpoyaz4037 department of defense and intelligence

@@neferpoyaz4037and sukhoi themselves

​@Simeon301091 the actual Sukhoi patent showed and overall average RCS rating of 0.5m² and a frontal RCS of 0.2m² with stealth coating and 1.1m² overall and 0.8m² without RAM coating. It makes it a low observable aircraft, not a true stealth fighter. India wanted a fighter to protect itself from Pakistani F-16s and other fighters they have and got the SU-57 which was designed to beat the F-16 in BVR. It's a 4th Gen hunter by design, it never was designed to compete with the F-35 or F-22 directly

His voiceovers gotten so much better too, before.he sounded almost ai, now he's got some life in it

tbf it is already being produced, just in very small numbers

@@imoheight I stand corrected. 24 complete aircraft expected by 2025 according to the Russians.

​@@NoahSpurrierand 20 plus 12 prototypes already built

@@eu3127 Again, that’s according to the Russian claims. They have a history of exaggerating their forces - 1961 Tushino Air Show in Moscow, 1961 Paris Air Show, 1999 Moscow Air Show. It’s difficult to put much credence in Russian military claims. Let’s talk about their tanks or navy or hypersonic super missiles. Paper tiger.

@@NoahSpurrier yep ,you always repeat the same things. You love so much wars,why you don't start one against Russia? Only then we'll see who is the paper tiger. But Hollywood make you look cool and powerful ,i admit that, an f14 beating two su57 ,amazing 😉

Not true, the f22 did drop bombs in Syria or its neighbor don’t quite remember, it killed a bunch of scientists or some shit.

It’s already at that point. The RCS numbers we know are the min values for f22 but average values for su57, hence the decent gap. In reality they are quite similar. Add on to the fact that the AL-51 engines are ALREADY being implemented into the jet (which the video was wrong about, saying that nothing is happening with them rn), this adds much more stealth and performance and really puts these jets on the same playing field

​@@Siduch. It isn't tho, the simple fact is only 10-15 of these things exist. meaning its not operational, you can spew paper numbers all day, but until you actually build the damn thing in bulk, it doesn't matter does it? 6th gen are suppose to be operational by 2030. Russia is a full generation behind in aircraft, and due to the ukraine war, they are going to have serious issues getting the materials they need to produce these in bulk while still trying to supply the insane waste of the war as putin seems perfectly fine throwing away both his equipment and hundreds of thousands of his men's lives for nothing more then his ego

@@Azagoreth if we’re talking about the war, it’s certainly for more than just Putin’s ego lol. Pretty much the future of Russian status as a global superpower depends on winning this war. But ye, the details and discrepancies don’t matter much if they can’t build the planes in large numbers anyways

​@Siduch. Irrelevant at this point, OPs point is still valid. America has flown the NGAD, and F-XX can probably flown now as well. F-22 is being upgraded as we speak.

Yeah I'm sure this story is 100% true, even the part where the F-22 pilot somehow knew the frequency to use to talk to these specific pilots.

@@TheByQQ I am sure that this jet scanners can pick up the chatter, if these pilots was talking. The report said the F-22 came up from underneath them as they inspected their weapon loadouts, you know the F-4 keeps all there loadouts external. Lol. Then came up beside them and said "You guys ought to go home". They had to be startled.

Its as funny as what 5th gen Aircraft UK have made?

​@@teknetiniumtankie cope

​@@teknetinium cope

similar with the laying F35 data.

@@teknetinium lol idk I really don’t care if they have one or not 😂

LOL

Xaxaxa

Danger zone

Documentary 😂😂😂

The thing that was the most misleading about that was that there were two flight-worthy Su-57's.

like you hypersonic missile that only exist in your fantasy

Like every raptor the us build?

Nah, the best way to compare the SU-57 is the Maus tank. Elegant, beautiful, with so much power to install fear, but when used in practice or battle..eh.

Guess west shd stop parroting their aircraft greatness and focus on development...unlike the Russians who silently do their job....

and 23's twin the mig 27