@@vincevvn I read the original comment and thought, "ya, he'd lose his arm because that watch looks Huge!" Your arm might fall off, but no way you'd lose that big piece of hardware attacked to the wrist.
I agree. Set the watch flat on concrete and drop a cinder block on it from 10 feet (3 meters) up. Only record the results if the cinder block hit the watch squarely, like a pancake - Not if a corner of the clock hit first.
That's been a big myth going around that "mil spec isn't good," and it's wrong. I don't know who started it. It's most likely someone not familiar with mil spec, or a former mil that had some experience with something that was terrible and was mil spec. Most likely it was someone that heard something on RU-vid, and now they're an expert. One that was floating around was that mil spec ARs aren't the best possible quality and that civilian manufacturers make higher quality ARs. It's partly true, but not that simple. For some things, yeah, mil spec isn't the best, but for most things it's usually better specs than stuff you can readily buy on the civilian market.
MIL-STD-810 is the military standard for testing, not materials. MIL-STD-810G is the newest standard and consists of 15 categories, including freezing, heating, rapid barometric pressure change, submersion, etc.. The shock drop test to secure the MIL-STD-810G standard is thirty times, dropping the item from a height of 1.5 meters (5 feet) onto a sheet of plywood on top of concert. This watch meets MIL-STD-810G standards. I saw another video where a girl froze the T Rex in a block of ice, climbed to the top of a pole, approximately 6 meters high (20 feet), and dropped it onto a pile of rocks... she killed the watch!
This is a sponsored video. Take it with a grain of salt. It's $180 for those wondering. Sounds cool, but 1. Does it come in any other styles? and 2. Can it run Crisis? 0:47 - The answer is no. Astronauts don't have wrists. Is this the same watch for each test or did you swap them out? In the video, you said they sent _some watches_ for you to test. 5:14 It's closer to a Nuclear Shadow than an imprint . lol 6:30 - Does the watch not display a Fathometer? 6:44 Oh, thank God! It has GPS so I can take it anywhere! The watch I have now doesn't come with GPS so I have to leave it at home.
Send one to Lauri at Beyond the Press and I'm sure he'll let you know how tough it really is, that would be a great Collab video! Very nice watch and seemingly similar to my galaxy 3, nice upgrade to be honest ;)
I was going to say the same thing. Send one to Lauri at Beyond The Press. He's got that pressure chamber that he's tested other dive, and water resistant watches in. He will put that watches pressure rating to the test!
@@renanbo6562They do have one or two... Like G-Shock Move GBD-H1000. 🙂 More precisely it is a smart sports watch cannot compare it with Apple or Samsung ones. The definition of Smart watch is too loose right now... 😀
Thank you for being honest with the sponsorship. I have no problem with RU-vidrs taking on sponsorships, but as a long time viewer all I ask is that when you make videos like this, you don’t give them the benefit of the doubt. Personally, I’d be more likely to purchase something you are advertising and testing if you got it to the breaking point. I want to see you blow something up lol. Thanks for the great videos, you’re an A-list content creator!
Garmin instinct: hey, welcome to the club, i'm standard and here's my twin: Tactical, Solar, eSport, and there's brother from another mother, like you Huawei Honor GS Pro & Casio H-1000: 'Sup
James: Space as seen by astronauts: Approx -250 to +250 F, or -156 to +121 C, plus A LOT of radiation. The first watch worn on the moon was the Omega Speedmaster. It was the only mechanical watch that passed all of NASA's tests, including 9g shock in three axis (many times). NASA wantned a mechanical watch in case all or most of the electronic timing failed. The Omega was used to time the 14 second burn on Apollo 13 that allowed reentry. You can still buy an Omega Speedmaster! I have one.
Hmm honestly I am a bit of a skeptical about this video regarding the watch I don't think the test you did on the watch were clear as to I've seen some weird cut immediately after the liquid nitrogen test as it makes the viewers rethink if this was really a brand video or you actually being a real action lab guy
It is the same watch though. What you saw burning on the watch screen was the oliophobic (idk how you spell it) coating melting away. That's the coating that keeps fingerprints and such from being a major problem on glass-covered screens. The test was to see if the watch was still functioning after being exposed to the heat, which it was.
Maybe compare it to the Xiaomi Mi Band 6. Would be interesting if a 30$ wearable (and the Most popular one) can withstand these extremes too. Or the Amazfit Band 5 it's basically identical to the Xiaomi but the same brand, so maybe they'll send you one.
I'm a little bit concerned about the freeze test, doesnt the ice protects the watch from the -43 deggrees? In poland harvesters do this to protect the plants when a freezing night comes, so I dont know if this test is relevant, correct me if im wrong
Was actually looking at these a few days ago. Looks like gadgetbridge supports them, which is great, but apparently the company was involved in attempts to get gadgetbridge taken down; which is very unfortunate behaviour. Very interested in a device with some of its features; but not interested in buying in to a cloud service; I want a fully local device. So if they see full local usage as problematic, then I see them as problematic.
You should have shown the time on the watch before and after you submerged the watch. The time on the watch was shown twice and it was 12:07 both times.
@@youtubeistyrannical1787 No, it just went to sleep, it's the same watch, vacuum isn't a big deal for electronics, there is absolutely no reason it would fail. Yes it's an ad, but it didn't fail there.
Okay, sure.... it will survive all of that, BUT........ will it survive a 2-year old playing with it for 5 minutes??? BTW: you didn't mention if they are EMI shielded... Would it survive strikes from a Tesla Coil? I blew out a 27" LCD monitor from 2 feet away with one of those bad boys (no spark even came close to it) Anyway their watches look cool... I'm heading over to their website right now!
That's why sponsorships like this pay big money. But what happens to this watch when you smash it against a doorknob or something harder? Typical wear stuff that's harder to guard against than temperature or pressure.
Should have known it's suspicious when a company is constantly rebranding Amazefit, Huami, Zepp, Xiaomi, every few months a new name along with an army of paid RU-vidrs who churn out exactly the same scripted reviews to bury the real relevant reviews. Hardware may actually be good but since you are stuck with faulty software it's extremely frustrating. For example (and none of these are a glitch with new model, these things have been flagged by users 8 months ago and still not fixed): 1. while in exercise mode, you cannot access rest of the watch as normal, so when you are on a long gps tracking hike of a few hours, you cannot access any of the watch screens, can't see the compass etc without ending the activity. (not pause & resume, you only can end it!) 2. Zepp app allows you to pair not just your watch but also other smart devices like a smart scale to have all the data in 1 place, your exercise, heartrate but also your weight, bonemass, fat percentages etc. Except that Zepp app is not compatible with any smartscale other than I assume their own. It also does not allow integration of data like Google Fit or Samsung Fit so you end up with just a separate silo of data that you cannot merge with your other data. 3. Battery may actually be good but it feels that software is causing it to glitch and be inefficient so you will end up disabling every feature you paid to have in the first place just so you can not have to charge every 2 days. Literally as I am typing this I am mindful of how I move my wrist across the keyboard to prevent the screen for turning on by accident, draining battery. 4. I have not been able to test ski tracking (sadly due to lockdown) but most likely also this has not been patched and if you look on reddit you will find users who have emailed support and nobody ever bothered fixing. It's very sad that what could be a great product, the company behind it doesn't seem to care to really improve, just to make more of them, sell them and then rebrand to sell more of the next thing with same unresolved glitches.
Just a heads up, thoes Fisher Scientific/control company thermometers you used in this video aren't accurate below about -32~-34C. They are decent up to the 250 they are rated at though.
You should show how a suction cup can only hold with a force of 1 atmosphere, 14.7 psi (1 kg/cm²) according to the area it covers. Then point out that a suction cup would not work at all in a vacuum.
