Thanks so much! Please share out the video to friends and rugby groups to help me grow it. I'll be covering upcoming games and also doing analysis videos.
Thanks very much. I'll definitely be looking at it and putting something up. Please help me grow my channel by sharing this video out. Word of mouth is the best advert.
impressive stuff.. that means theres a lot going into preparation with the new coaching staff by Razor. looks like if it all goes well it could be a well oiled machine destroying rush defenses..
I think the way to beat flat D is to compress the backline,shorten the pass,draw the D into mid pitch,secure the ruck ,then away again .If going direct then the forward pack needs to operate as single unit of 8 hitting the ball straight up into contact and draw the D mid pitch.
@actiaint watch the Bok backline of the early to mid 1980s.They ran very close lines with short passes .Very effective because there is not only ball movement but quick transfer and player movement.These long passes with a stagnant receiver or the passes where the receiver has to check their run because the ball is not passed for them to run on to ,does my head in.
@@lockk132 leicester fainga'anuku and Will Jordan made great running lines for short passes from first receiver for Crusaders. its not happening with the ABs. the backs are static always
Watch replays of the 90's All Blacks and how they played. Yes, rules are slightly different but just google the replays and you will see why they were in a class of their own. Scott.
Maybe, but other teams have caught up to the All Blacks now. It’s healthy for the sport to have more tier 1 teams that can beat each other on any given day.
Looking at the wide shots it is very evident this so called rush defense is actually offside defense getting a jumpstart (0.20), (2.36) just 2 examples. It appears that as long as the whole line is offside refs are okay with this.
agreed , itojo is clearly in front of the rear most England foot at 0:20 and is offside, but in real time this must be hard to pick. So, imho, the rules should be changed to a meter or even two behind the last foot. While this might be even harder to police, it would give the attacking team a bit more time and space to attack, adding to the game, rather than detracting from it, which offside defenses tend to do.
Awesome analysis and confirms what I suspected with Razor. He's going to play NFL, he always mentions it and uses Gridiron terminology a lot e.g. referring to First Fives as Quarterbacks etc
@@barneyboy2008 thanks very much. I'm having a lot of fun analysing the games, and hopefully it'll help people new to rugby to understand things a bit better
My pleasure. Glad you enjoyed it. I've just released an analysis of what makes an effective wrap around, which you might like ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hMIO5pVTFx0.html
Interesting, but the real All Black Cowboy moves were forward plays , deep in the mauls and rucks , usually from lineouts, hard to spot, and based on Mark Shaw moving through a drive, out of sight.
Thanks, guys. The All Blacks are starting to get it right. Lots of small errors in the first game against Argentina that derailed their momentum, and added up to the loss.
the NRL Rugby League grubber kick they can put one through a hornets nest of defenders & the tightest of spaces & consistently find gold at the other end of the paddock, I don't know why Union hasn't cottoned on to this untapped treasure chest
The grubber kick and chip kick have been used in rugby for ever. Not sure what rugby you watch. Having said that the grubber kick in particular is generally not used by the ABs ... certainly not as much as the chip kick which the ABs used last week against Argentina to create the first try.
@@nicktorea4017 "hasn't cottoned on to this" "untapped" your words which sort of implies it is not a thing in Rugby which it clearly is ... or should be to anyone that follows the game on a regular basis. I follow rugby from all levels - men and women - across the rugby world. I see the grubber kick used with effectiveness often. I do agree that there is much profit to be gained from using it.
Yes this really confuses me. If the up and and under is deployed and any of the personnel around the receiver even slightly impair the ability of the person aiming to catch the ball then the ref will call obstruction. Yet you can have a wall of players standing in front of your back pod and the ref deems this perfectly acceptable - just does not make sense - either there is an obstruction rule or there is not.
It was small errors that hampered them, but you could see the intent. In the second test against Argentina things started to click. A big issue was accuracy of the passing, with passes going next to the man instead of in front of him for him to run onto.
Whoever came up with rush defense idea was a fool. All its done is made rugby boring. I wonder which country started this and more specifically whose idea was it?
@@johnvanvuuren581 I have to disagree. The All Blacks went around the Boks on numerous occasions and made good ground. The Boks had fantastic scramble defence, but the All Blacls definitely created space and got around them on the outside.
