How The States Voted In Every Presidential Election 

If he didn’t die so soon could of had it for 3-4 more

Lmaof XD NO LIMITED RUNS!

Israel Country Cube actually he was able to keep running because of how insanely popular and world war 2. The rule has been 2 terms since George Washington

@@Bismarck46 They literally had to pass an amendment to make it law *because* of FDR. What are you talking about?

@@Bismarck46 It was George Washington's recommendation to serve two terms. It was not a rule.

Nixon actually didn't know it was happening his campaign team wired a telephone used to call hookers

He did it before the election

Nixon didn’t do anything wrong

@@honestgbfan5324 enough already, you go on and on and on...no one is reading all that drivel, that garbage you are whining about...GTFOH....LMFAOROTFF..

A. Milo you are the garbage

@Sonic Phil I believe someone voted against Monroe so that he couldn't break the historic significance of Washington, who remains the only President elected unanimously.

@@a1001ku True

@@a1001ku it was technically a faithless elector. (Monroe doctrine anyone)

@@speedy01247 The faithless elctor voted John Quincy Adams because I think he didn't like Monroe

​@@GamerPro-yc7ie He also wanted Washington to have the honor of being the only president to getting a unanimous electoral college vote

Lol

"Can't fool us, Reagan" - Minnesota 1984

"Can't fool us, Washington and Adams!" - New York, 1789

"Nevermind." - New York, 1792

John Matthew Podesta (Insert non-relevant over emotional comment)

Reminder this was posted in 2015.

Its not factual in one respect! Blue was used to represent Republicans up until recent times. Some time after Ronald Reagan, Democratic bias within the media changed the colors that represent the Democrats from Red because of the use of the Communist term REDS to describe the policies and politics of the Democratic Party. Without ever saying one word, the entire NEWS media changed the colors from Red to Blue overnight, in yet another example of Social Engineering to manipulate the population. Today nobody even remembers that taking place except a few who recognize what is gong on around them for what it is! Dumbing down of the American People through its education system which is now nothing more than an "Indoctrination System" has taken its toll. We have become delusional in what we feel, and Reality has no bearing on thought any longer :(

@@maxbentley9162 i was alive and involved in politics at the time. Like i said, if you go back and watch actual news footage from the time, Republicans had been BLUE. If you watch a recently made rewritten history version, it will show red. So FACTUALLY, the people of this and prior decades are being manipulated to believe false premises that then become thr basis of thier belief. The original documentation proves this! In the past, when Persia,Egypt, Rome, and even modern day Germany did not want the facts to be known, they would eliminate facts pertaining to that such as monuments, writings, even carved images were destroyed and removed from view until that knowledge became forgotten. Today their is a push to misrepresent or even eliminate knowlefge about a war fought by the Democratic party, predominately in the south, to keep slavery alive! Again those facts are almost daily news! As recent as 1960s this hatred and racism, perpetrated by the Democratic Party, was still daily national news as democratic govrnors in such states as Alabama and Mississippi etc, used local law enforcement and State Troopers to attack the civil rights movement. President Johnson, in order to pass the Civil Rights Act, had to abandon his hate filled Democratic Party and go to the Republicans to get the bill passed! These truths are no longer taught by the liberal based education system and the knowledge is being forgotten. Soon, with the liberal backed media, no one will rember that it has been Republicans that have always fought for freedom, and librrals who fought against it. Its easy to look up. But only if you go back to the original information to find. The truth is being buried to hide these acts, and lies are being taught as truth. But if you do not look, you will never see! Nothing more needs to be said, as the truth is out there and speaks for itself once found! But the lies are placed within your lap in the hopes you are to lazy, uneducated, or biased, to get up and find reality! :)

honestgbfan Why do you guys care about switching colors, does it really matter that much to you, it’s just a screen

and Washington D.C.

1984 as well heh

Wait

Chuckles I'm in danger

theif

Probably lost because of his last name

I think McGovern is the best one. “President McGovern” is as on the nose as “Dr. Surgery”

I’d like your comment if it wasn’t at 69

@@peoplesrepublicofliberland5606 Rufus King

We also almost had a president Clinton in 1812 before the actual president Clinton.

They actually made a mistake on JFK's election, since he won more states in the South than shown here.

The world is merely controlled by us, Ohio

2020 the first time won't happen? only time will tell

Wait, it’s all Ohio?

@@christianfilmssstm8933 Always has been.

@@publicenemy210 JFK won without Ohio.

011azr A switch in roles. Before the 80's, the Democrats were pro-slavery and then pro-segregation when slavery was outlawed. The Republican are classical Liberals, while the Democrats turned into social liberals. It is a interesting switch.

011azr The side's views flipped.

jthedog One more proof that politics is two-faced, opportunistic, and hypocritical.

Southern states usually have a lot of racist and the racist politicians where used to always be democrats but nowadays the racists are in the republican side

FelipeTheFirst //FTF Any proof of that? Because that makes no sense why they switched parties randomly. Also, they tried to get in Hilary Clinton into office, someone that called blacks super predators and has a idol that was a Dragon of the KKK.

It’s strange seeing how the map could change so quickly in just 4 years

@Riley Manns You're pathetic to assume all 74 Million of us Trump voters are Trumplicans. Then again, you voted for braindead Biden!! 🤣

@Riley Manns Trump is far better than Biden, son. Look at the border crises!! Sure, Trump's attitude is a negative one but he put America first, God knows he did. Biden is a typical coward politician. Trump has guts. Again, stop assuming all 74 voters are the same.

@Riley Manns Trump did more for black folks than Biden has ever done. Biden allows Black Lives Matter to riot and destroy black businesses.

@Bergelicious75 .

What scares me is Red California

@@zackcross7190 yes. That California once stood for the constitution is scary to you, tells a lot about your bias. California once knew what mattered, then it went stupid.

@@manoftruth0935 Lol, you accuse him of being biased then come out with this crap.

@@CH-wp5hp at least he's not wrong....look at what it is now....

@@manoftruth0935 you guys gotta learn your history. For most of time, republicans had democrat views and democrats had republican views, but it switched. For example, president Lincoln was a republican but he would be a modern day democrat.

1860 to 1928 Almost Ruby Red 1932 to 2016 Shinning Blue

They almost voted for Reagan, I believe Mondale won it by 0.5%

@@lorenzjudeceloso2444 you had a few 72 and 2020 are going to be the most similar.. and WIERD Democrats want Trump gone like Nixon..

@@bufordmaddogtannen5164 nope 2020 will not be that year btw Twin Cities, Rochester and St Croix will do the trick for dems hahaha

@@lorenzjudeceloso2444 not after the Dems burned down the cities they love.. gonna need alot more Somalians..

xD

argh i was cgonna tupe that

@Sonic Phil Dude you should speak. Minnesota was crazy. And so are you. You are rigged who doesnt care a hoot for this country. You people have no respect for America and great presidents.

@Sonic Phil Imagine wanting mondale as president lmao

@Sonic Phil You don't know shit about politics shut up

@Sonic Phil One, if not the best presidents ever. Also great human being. Would've been a perfect grandpa.

@Sonic Phil You make a very good and important point but you cant just look at the bad stuff. You also have to look at the good things.

@ Bella Swag Money 😂 Yes but In the good ol days when their were more than 2 parties

"Why is it always Boston that disturbs the King's sleep?"

Nixon didn’t do that bad. Except for the spying.

Nixon was a good president, but a bad man. The reverse goes to Carter who was a bad president but a good man.

Oh no McGovern would be the worst president

Mondale only won it by 3,000 votes

FUCK REAGAN

Fuck conformity

Luke Detering Poor DC would prevent it. They always vote Democrat. LOL

let's make Reagan eternal President! lol

Yeah, I'm surprised as well

the parties used to be switched. democrats were more like republicans and republicans were more like democrats,

Political re-alignment.

@@faithfulmer2081 That is a conplete myth. The South voted strongly for FDR and JFK (who are praises by modern Democrats), as well as Carter in 1976 and Bill Clinton in 1992/96. Only from George W. Bush onwards has it voted solidly Republican. And even then, Florida voted twice for Obama, for example, and twice for Trump now.

@@cantloop9589 I’ve study electoral politics and immigration is not even the most important factor. Cali is 63% minority and Texas is 61% minority. If demographics were the sole reason then Texas should have flipped in the 2000s, even if Cali was 100% white it would still be a democrat state. The flip was predominantly because of the transitional collapse of the middle class in the state.

There's actually a lot of errors in the map, 1896 and 1900 both have states going the other way than in reality, and there's probably more.

ya boi rah but he’s really bad at McGoverning

I wouldn't mind the moderate Labour MP Alison McGovern becoming UK Prime Minister.

rtozier2011 I think BoJo is here to stay

@@akzebraminer5679 There will come a time when he isn't PM though. Even if he retires instead of losing an election. The most likely next non-Tory PM is a Labour one.

rtozier2011 Says who? That’s 5 freaking years away! Nobody knows what’s going to happen.

Yup. Only Massachusetts and D.C. voted for George McGovern, granting him a measly 17 electoral votes. Meanwhile, Libertarian candidate John Hospers won ONE electoral vote in Virginia.

and 1984 as well

dalmation black McGovern was from Massachusetts probably

You know Nixon rigged that election right? He was about to be impeached, but he had Ford pardon him

_Markus _ he was from South Dakota.

Context?

it means that the map is almost the opposite of today

Which is why it is said that modern Republicans and Democrats basically switched positions from the old parties.

@Sonic Phil Thats a good one

@Sonic Phil That one was even better

West Virginia also didn't split from Virginia until the Civil War.

Not really - many states used to have different boundaries, but you don’t count them for the sake of simplicity. If Maine didn’t vote for a certain candidate, you don’t say it did.

same with VA and WV

@@peterbennett3760 but why include west virginia then?

Think Fact The reason Maine was split from form Massachusetts was because in 1820, Missouri wanted to become a state. However, it will also be slave state unbalancing the Free States with 11 and Slave states 12. So the Maine and Massachusetts were split of to keep the balance.

Yep lol

He was our guy! We vote for Wisconsinites!

weegeeアメリカ *LAFOLLEEEEEEEEEEEETTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTE*

Alaska and Hawaii watching it like.....

Actually Calvin College was the only winning Republican not to carry Wisconsin who's name wasn't Bush. Wisconsin kind of ruined it that year if it had gone to Coolidge he would have won everything outside the fmr Confederacy while losing everything in it.

And only Massachusetts liked his McGoverning.

are u gonna completely forget about McDonalds?

🤣🤣🤣😂😂

Lol

Honestly would prefer that to the options we're looking at right now lol

@@afnaansyed5975 which are?

@@early5326 the guy that smelled Tara Reade's hair vs. the guy from Home Alone 2

@@afnaansyed5975 yes, I most definitely remember who that is, thank you.

@@early5326 wait were you actually asking who the candidates were? If so my apologies. Former VP Joe Biden is running on the Democratic ticket against current president Donald Trump on the Republican ticket

Knowledge lol

Because you are interested in other countries politics. *also its very satisfying video to look at.

LOL I am from South America

Idk same I’m from the middle-East, but the internet takes you to paths that you weren’t exactly following *How did I get here?*

I'm from Bangladesh... I'm watching this because we Didn't get any election in the last decade.

How it should be

Me a german would call this democracy

Ik, it’s disgusting to look at

@Elliott Maine is half red soo

North vs south. When red comes in is when Abraham Lincoln comes in as the founder of the Republican Party. The north fought the Democrat south and yet people claim it was the opposite nowadays.

+The Copyright Outlaw yeah

He was a defaco Federalist.

+Marylandbrony you mean defacto?

Ethan Lin While he was nominally non-partisan, He was broadly sympathetic to the federalist program.

Marylandbrony thanks!

He almost got Massachuetts and Rhode Island

SpyroPS1iscool they're liberal as fuck

John Graves i swear he didnt even win a percentage over the popular vote in minnesota which was his home state

he won by like .18% lol

Reagan was that good.

@Jonathan Froger If you watched the video you'd see the specter of the civil war and race in most elections. Other than his home state the only Goldwater wins were in the first tier of succeeding states. A similar voting block occurred in 48 and 68. The candidates who pulled off these moves were the old school racists George Wallace and Strom Thurmond (one of those 2 of 22 you cite). This is not hard, Fox News' own internal research found a majority of its viewers were strongly in favor of massive socialist programs even widespread support for the Warren wealth tax. This is why tough guy 8 0'clock Sean Hannity can't beat bowtie sissy Tucker Carlson. It was the conservatives only path to victory after thirty plus years of the greatest prosperity in mankind's history.

less than 4,000 votes from winning minnesota which was mondales home state

@@azorahai772 And cause he was Norwegian, which is common in Minnesota

f roosevelt 1932 got a lot

Reagan was one of the best presidents.

@@Fenris__ i would actually disagree. While his cuts on government were seen by many as benefitial, his incresed spending created much of the debt problem we have today, additionally, it forced G. Bush senior to raise taxes during a recession. There is a great video called "did reagannomics really work?" Which explains why his policies were mostly short term sighted and actually were a detrement to the us economy.

Because Democrats and Republicans were completely flipped in ideology back then compared to where they are now.

Not flipped in ideology, just flipped geographically. It's a common misconception that both parties did a complete flip. There are extremely easy counter arguments to make on that point, such as Widrow Wilson's foreign policy, Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover's strong belief in capitalism, FDR's belief in big government, and the like.

+Global Warming Skeptic Well actually that's not true there was an ideological flip as well. Specifically when it comes to the principles of progressiveness. It was, however, different party's entirely which is where the confusion comes in. While they were "Republicans" they aren't the same republicans we see today. They were Radical Republicans pushing for change in ways often viewed on as radical and progressive by their days standards. What we saw changing in the 30s and finally solidified as today's modern Republican Party with Reagan has changed completely from the party's original purpose which is partially why it was so confusing what the party genuinely stood for before Reagan. Civil war era democrats were remarkably similar, however, to modern conservative republicans with principals such as tradition and maintaining course in the country strongly opposing progressive thinking and change in society a direct conflict with its modern message.

Asher Lanzone It's not confusing at all. It is confusing because Liberals always try and rewrite history. They equate a geographical flip with an ideological one, which is not the case. That's not to say that the parties haven't changed, but they haven't changed as much as you think they have. Again, Woodrow Wilson supported the League of Nations and was pro immigration. This today would be just as progressive as anything, supporting strong alliances with European nations. As also stated, there is the Coolidge-Hoover era where Republicans were very similar to how they are today: Anti-Immigration, Pro Market, while the Democrats were the pro immigration party, which is why they got routed from 1920-1932. Further evidence of this: Look at FDR, known as the father of Progressivism. Guess where he won the highest percentage of voters? The South. If your logic of an ideological flip were real, the South would have remained conservative and voted for the Republican Hoover or Landon, but states like South Carolina voted for FDR at a rate of 90%. And then there's the McCarthy era, where he was strongly opposed to the New Deal and socialist policies in general. This was well before the 1960s when Liberals say the "flip" happened. So again, there was no ideological flip, and the historical evidence demonstrates this.

Global Warming Skeptic I appreciate your thought out argument, but I would like to assert that Woodrow Wilson acted purely on economic pressures following World War 1 to make sure that something of a similar magnitude would never happen again, and I would also like to point out that we did not even after that join the League of Nations diminishing its backbone one of the most key reasons it failed. And to say that FDR won both the Northern and Southern states initially off of principal is a fallacy it was coming off of a steaming post Civil War era. The South refused to associate in any way with Northern Republicans because of their role in the Civil War. FDR won the South out of hatred for Republicans and the north by promising change among other things that appealed to a majority of American citizens at the time. This lead to a strong victory by FDR. I said initially because his second and subsequent elections all were won off of the success he had in office making some of the most approved of change in American history partially because of his ability to control both sides of the isle. During his presidency ideological mindsets caught up with the political reality and a "flip" occurred in the North and South. Now again the republican party did not adopt former Democratic policy but instead its own brand of being merely the opposite of the Northern party who then changed to be based off of a far more liberal mindset.

Meanwhile Wisconsin is just chilling

@@maximusmedia8412 i mean it was LaFolletes home state.

Grandma Karen because they didn’t like the way he McGoverned

@@redbrixanimations thats the worst pun i have ever seen in my life

Or maybe America really liked Nixon at the time

Massachusetts:👀👁👁

Took him awhile to find a vp Candidate as well

@Dumbo Octopus parties don’t flip. They just change their platform over time. And if there was an outright flip at some point, DC would’ve voted Republican at some point but it never has.

Because Republicans used to be Progressive and Democrats used to be Conservative

@@engagementengagement8836 No Republicans were never "progressive." Nice invention of history but you failed. Republicans used to be Conservative and Democrats many ideologies, but always racist too. Now Democrats are still many ideologies and still racist, just not against blacks.

@@markhenley3097 Republicans havent always been racist. The republican party was founded against slavery. Abraham Lincoln was a republican. Also, even modernly some reds arent racist. Dwight D. Eisenhower sent troops to end segregation in schools. Theodore Roosevelt was the first president to invite an African-American to the White House. Richard Nixon was good friends with Martin Luther King Jr.'s dad.

@@markhenley3097 dumbo. the ideologies flipped. democrats were racists and republicans were liberal. then came the 1900s and suddenly republicans became the party of wealthy lobbyists and democrats seized on it to proclaim they are for the working class. and slowly the ideologies shifted. in today's world now the republican party is full of racists and democrats full of liberals. the cycle will go on but overall, the world gets progressive.

There is no colorblindness that affects blue and red, the closest there is would be red-green and blue-yellow

@@Cuber112 bruh so this guy is lying about being colorblind?

@@BabySonicGT there are lots of different types of colorblind

speaking of music what is the music called

"Hail to the Chief" is what you'll be looking for.

Bcz Immigration. Soon Texas will be blue as well.

OilyDumplings the racist can not take over the south the way they did in the 1800

OilyDumplings HELLL NAH TO THE NO! As a Texan everyone here is extremely conservative. It’s mostly big cities that are liberals, but Texas as a whole is, and will always be Republican

Carlos Castro Texas is no longer a safe red state. You probably didn’t notice but in 2018 Beto o rouke almost unseated Ted cruz and only lost by 2pts and it’s not just because of the unpopularity of Trump and Cruz combined it’s because the growing liberal and Latino population growing in the state. Sooner Texas will turn blue if demographics continue at the rate it’s going now. 2018 senate race Cruz: 51% Beto O’ Rouke: 48.8% If you are a Republican winning with this type of margin I wouldn’t be still saying Texas is a safe red state.

@@doingmoms3483 Not going to happen. Many hispanics yes, but surprise surprise, they are all LEGAL, and conservative, and support the WALL!

Barry Goldwater _was_ from Arizona but lost to incumbent Johnson

not really gwb was really hated presdient

@@emowithagun5828he literally had the highest approval rating of any president ever wtf are u talking about😂

@@dancarr820 Yeah during 9/11, but he had a really low approval rating in his second term.

Ethan Scott me

meh

Sorry but im from a country with democracy.

Not me, I was more interested seeing when California fell in the pit of libtards.

Ethan Scott me (Minnesota)

I think it is more likely that they existed. But which state wss was very swingable.

It existed there were just way more of them, it went from pretty much every state with 20+ electoral votes in the 60s to Florida Pennsylvania and Ohio today.

Crazy Horse I did

69 likes ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Mondale only won Minnesota by 3000 votes, and bear in mind that it was also Mondale's home state.

coming from Minnesota, we Apologize as the Twin Cities are a bunch of assholes.

Guess Massachusetts people are virgins

@@hasnijabajrektarevic9852 And everyone else got Chlamydia.

He did get a dam named after him so that evens things out

He also got a vacuum named after him because of how much he sucked.

@Robert Ortiz-Wilson yes he was

Same almost three tbh

They'll probably do it every ten years

@Rickotoon now it is Biden currently as clear. Trump is an ex president

xD

No, you just take a lot of interest in American history

Greg Pim it makes sense tho, about half of the names listed never became president :P

*more than half...

People will always remember the winner not the runner up:)

Yep, I’m pretty sure West Virginia was still a swing state in 2000.

Lyla Marcks La Follete won it because he was from there, though he was still very popular

Lafollete won almost as much of the popular vote nationwide as Davis

@@edpspoopsock5150 LaFollete recieved 16.6% of the popular vote and Davis received 28.8% percent

And in a few states, Lafillete actually had more votes than Davis.

Nah reagan wanted the map all red. That was his birthday wish

@@emowithagun5828 maybe that was Nixon’s wish in 1972, as he got 49 states except Mass.

yeah. nixon's agenda was normal for his party, but how he got his victory made him a pretty bad person...(i think, dont judge me because i dont know anything about nixon's rule)

Nixon in my opinion was a great president, though he had many flaws and was really paranoid.

@@curses6166 watergate

I searched this!

I googled something similar a several days ago, and now youtube recommend me this

I searched it up

Kool Aid man.

I did to see if parties 'switched'

yep people didnt cheer for a party like a fanatic back then

2:07 I live in Massachusetts

@@thomascremens me to

true true

what do you mean

Ezekiel Pina your vote doesn't matter anymore delegates pre-choose your decision, and now the cooperates have forced an eduational and societal norm to follow the two party system.

ah mr lenin. big fan of your work

Karl Marx hey just wondering, do you like mao mr.marx?

lol

also rip Minnesota

We were right

Bill Clinton got elected twice so he did pretty well

Berk Sarioz yeah, but it took him almost 200 years to win

Lmao

cahart 98 roflmao what a dirty mind u have.

he was origanally against having a two party democracy

@@deeznuts8659 He was just against parties in general.

@@DaDARKPass oh...yeah I guess that makes sense

It worked two times my friend ;)

+Kiyan Kayser there is a 50% chance of a Clinton winning president!

Lego Adam now 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333%

MapsPlus h. Clinton sux

Lego Adam Hillary won

i want to be wooshed so its GEORGE Clinton not HILLARY Clinton

@@alostnerd7032 L

@@alostnerd7032 L

@@alostnerd7032 L

@@alostnerd7032 L

a b they could’ve stretched it out longer but it would be boring it’s not that hard to take a clip out your mouse on it and stretch it

@@destinationwvy3598 I'm lazy. Why do you think I'm watching a boring video on RU-vid rather than doing something else?

@@ab3040 just pause at a cool map

Yeah I had to slow the video down to x0.25 lol

@@xiphactinusaudax1045 but that ruins the epic music

Ohio in 2020:uhh...

Only two times has the great state been wrong, 1960 2020, otherwise, they control the election

@@anthonychaboude1548 and 1944

@@buffaloc20 well the dude said since the 1950s

What is a fun fact about Jefferson? Not trying to be mean or anything

Our state predicted the future

Lol

Cleveland, Ohio is named after Moses Cleveland, not Grover Cleveland