How To Buy a Gun In Canada: Armed and Reasonable 

Because one blew her head off on live TV once? I mean... they aren't all Anderson Cooper or Sean Hannity. Two different levels of crazy shit eaters there. Actually... yeah... no... Reporters today... Somebody hand them a Xanax or something.

Thanks......................She laughed.

@@dhotnessmcawesome9747 wait what?????

@@Midas_Mash3r Google it. Or even search it on RU-vid. Everyone's talked about it twice by now. It's OLD footage.

SYMPOL BMX Canadians are better with guns for a reason but that’s a bias statement as well.

Usman Siddiqui Woah there partner

@@usmansiddiqui4217 you see! Now I'm thinking your not acceptable to have a gun with you, by the way you sound.

Well, a Vice reporter.

@@maxvaldez9055 "journalist" on vice

Sadly a pen and a computer is like a loaded gun to these so called journalists.

besteversaw she said in 31 states don’t require it, the rest do. On that she is right. Gun laws are left to the State

@@ebsell Federal background checks are a thing. There are additional hoops to jump through based on states.

well technically she's right. You can BUY it without a background check, you just cant get your hands on it.

@@ebsell no all 50 states require it. For any online firearm purchase it needs to be shipped to a gun store and a federal background check needs to be ran.

She's talking about what the gun haters, politicians and the media call the "gun show loophole". It isn't really a loophole at all. Yes, you can go to a gun show and buy a gun without a background check, through a private sale from an individual, NOT a licensed dealer. The dealers are the ones in the booths, the individual non dealers are just basically attendees to the gun show. Usually you see them walking around with a rifle slung over their shoulder or sometimes loitering around the front entrance or parking lot. A dealer/FFL must run a NICS background check on all firearm purchases. Online dealers must send the firearm to a licensed dealer who then runs the background check before they give you your firearm. They usually charge a small fee for doing the transfer. Private sales are an entirely different thing. One individual (NON dealer) can sell to another individual without any paperwork or background check just as if you're selling a TV or set of golf clubs etc. Responsible individuals will use good judgement when selling to an unknown person by getting a copy or picture of the buyers ID and will fill out a bill of sale and not sell to suspicious looking or acting people. Gun shows are not just free for all gun sales like she, and the gun hating politicians make them out to be. It's misleading to people (voters) that don't know any better.

That's what they meant by reasonable. As in were going to keep on taking your rights year by year 😂😂😂. There is laws meant to protect, and there is laws made to gradually take away freedoms. It's sort of like throwing a frog in boiling water.

Oh exactly! It’s all “common sense” remember 😂

Fast forward 2023 LOL

That's because that was always the plan. It never stops with just one they want all of them. They want all of them gone out out hands

It is a great thing. Most countries even Europes don't allow guns.😊

LOL..............I thought they would cut that out!

Hahahahahahahaahahaa,,,,, soooooo true !!!

For real.

No shit... don’t let them figure out that the gun is mightier than the pen. 😆

did you just copy the previous guys comment?

Active Self Protection which part?

Active Self Protection I've seen you in a few news clips and was curious show much they edited your interviews to fit thier interests

termlesshalo he is the guy with the white polo at the NRA show

Active Self Protection you're awesome dude, love your vids. I'm from Canada and I agree with your statement, this video she also emphasizes that gun ownership in Canada is a privilege and it is on the books ,but many Canadians strongly disagree. Also defending oneself with a gun is a very risky thing here in Canada, but I and most gun owners would rather be judged be 12 then carried by 6. Keep up your good work and cover your ASP.

Active Self Protection also dude I subscribe to your channel!

I ducked when she did that but then I forgot she was a vice reporter so if the gun accidentally discharged... well let’s just say it wouldn’t be the end of the world

obtree which is the worst way to do that

obtree is it really not that obvious? She looks down the barrel or if you want to get technical puts her head VERY close to the barrel. That has to be the worst way to check for obstructions.

obtree you’ve never owned a firearm have you? Or if you do you are an irresponsible one? First rule is to treat every gun like a loaded gun. You never know, just when you think it’s cleared you end up doing something stupid. 2nd is to always point your gun in a safe direction. This includes when cleared. This goes hand in hand with what she did. 3rd never point the gun at anything your not going to shoot. Unless you want to shoot yourself I suggest you don’t point it at your face 4 is to keep your booger hook off the bang bang switch. Also known as trigger discipline. 5 is to know what lies behind your target. Also known as be observant enough to not point it at anything other than your target. Follow all these and your good. Good day

@@nikolassmithers4870 Bruh, I haven't made a youtube comment in over 8 years but yours just made me want to write one. The Canadian Firearms Training Course teaches every step to proving safe a firearm. The final step, it to verify the bore is clear of obstruction before any form of use, storage or handing it off. On many firearms looking down the backend (the chamber) is enough. Eg: Break action rifles, shotguns etc. On many other firearms it is impossible to see through the chamber to the muzzle. Once making safe and every other procedure is done you must check the bore. The gun is made safe, unloaded, partially opened, bolt locked or safetied and it hasn't left your hands. There's no way a round is going to make it in there and kill you. You don't point it at your head with the trigger finger ready. It's a 45* tilt and a peak for light passing through. If you don't do this, do your ACTS and PROVE without the E, you may load and fire through on obstruction which could kill or seriously harm. A SSUME EVERY FIREARM IS LOADED C ONTROL THE MUZZLE DIRECTION AT ALL TIMES T RIGGER FINGER AWAY FROM THE TRIGGER GUARD S EE THAT THE FIREARM IS UNLOADED via PROVE P OINT THE BARREL IN A SAFE DIRECTION R EMOVE ALL AMMUNITION O BSERVE THE CHAMBER V ERIFY THE FEED PATH E XAMINE THE BORE Follow all these, and you're good. Good day. P.S. Military background and gun collector. We do this with the C7/M16/AR15 as well except we can look through the chamber when making safe.

Yup... lmao.

Yup, no more for them. But nobody is coming to take them…right?

Right? lol

in B.C we can even get body armor that can stop a 308. round

Infinity and Beyond lol

you can buy ar500 armor plates in most states still

California is a shithole with good weather. Please help.

and even though gun crime is low in say Britain, murder rates are still high. in fact they are the crime capital of Europe.

America has a 4 times higher intentional homicide rate than the UK.

And UK vastly outranks the US in forcible rape, robbery, burglary, home invasions, assault and battery, grand theft......

Mark M but the US has 5x the population of the U.K.

+Mr.Doverfield a rate takes population into account.

The requirement for buying a weapon at gun shows depends from state to state. Several do not require background checks. Guess it's you who is the liar.

Just like the ridiculous notion that you can buy guns online and have them sent to your home. NOPE! You can pay for them online and have them shipped to a licensed dealer who will do a background check BEFORE any transfer is made.

@@m.redleg252 Doesnt really mean much when your buddy you are trying to defend got outed as a liar.

@@Jonathan-Pilkington What are you talking about? Wait, nevermind, I dont want to know.

@@m.redleg252 It's ok, that how conversations with nuts like you usually go.

its part of the test. i know its kinda stupid

At that point you know the gun is unloaded

@@MrSexyNipple doesn’t matter treat every gun as if it is loaded

@@jacobdensmore5058 I understand your point, but no matter what there's still a point where you look down the barrel and you know it's not loaded. Cleaning.

@@theoriginaldavid6969 you use the lever to clear the rifle

Luis Cas 6:08 she says no BG check...that is false!

Right?! Insane how wrong!

Luis Cas, Private sales require no background check in the US, many of these private transactions being planned or taking place online, but otherwise you right.

LIVING IN ALASKA TySang907, She said limited, not no background check.

@@prestonnoneya3767 no, she clearly says "no background checks" at around 6:08. Listen again

Hi Meatwad

AMEN

Yup bought a .22 at a gun show and guess what I had to do a background check

Honestly that's the biggest thing that erks me about this video I'm happy that it encourages people to get into shooting. But that was a straight up lie background checks and being a resident are required by law.

IseeNoSkys OR the people who never have BEEN in a Gun Show their entire life

Right. Vice = bullshit.

That's the way I've always had to do it.

Yes very deceptive--just like the Michael Moore's farce.

Fringeless uh in Colorado u send them shits to your house

@TruthSeeker @T m0ney you can do allot of illegal things, but it's still illegal.

Canadians have a right to defend their property or themselves as long as their defensive actions are reasonable under the circumstances. This means that if you injure an intruder entering your home or property, you would need to show that the circumstances gave you no other reasonable choice.

Yup were forced to defend ourselves with lil water guns its fucking bs 😐 i hate our government

Yes because technically everything on this land of Canada belongs to the “crown”, and you don’t technically “own” anything without “his majesty’s grace”. That’s why the law regarding property is not the same as in the states. As for why you cannot defend yourself with “excessive power”, I have no clue what genius came up with that.

You can absolutely defend yourself but you have to accept the due process of law and justice that come with it.

you can not legally use a firearm for self defense in Canada. The government in America's hat is getting out of hand. I think it's time to tip our hat, if you know what I mean. Can't wait till Canada is the 51st - 63rd state.

If you need the government to restrict yourself and others from buying a gun to make you feel safer, you don't deserve freedom.

Wow

trifacto the United States was founded on the backs of people fighting for liberty from an oppressive overreaching government. The reason why gun ownership is a constitutional right is to prevent government oppression and to protect the home and put food on the table.

+kuneefay you've got a pretty damn oppressive government now. You have the highest incarceration rates in the developed world, NSA spying programmes, a militarised and aggressive police force, corrupt politicians cheating the system. When are your guns gonna sort these issues out?

s0 if y0u are n0t all0wed t0 have a gun... y0u are f0r sure free then?

It's actually part of the licensing. Specifically to look directly down the business end of a firearm. Yes, it is super fucking stupid. I couldn't tell you why it's in there as there are about a half dozen better ways to prove a weapon... But it is and you will fail unless you do it. The rule should be to never, ever point a gun at ANYONE'S head, let alone your own... But it sure as shit isn't.

Diogenic Polymath for real?

They cut out the part when she opened the action and checked that the chamber is empty. AFTER that you suppose to check that there is nothing in the barrel with the action is still open.

^ cant believe that they cut out the chamber check considering every pal or restricted course i've taken missing that would've been a fail

Ya they teach you to do that, to make sure nothing is blocking the barrel.

lol

you had to add french ppl

You offer to buy them all a Double Double and a timbit.

Just whatever you do man.......make sure the French Canadian is the first one down.

Every Canadian owns at least 5 hockey sticks. Moose and Polar Bear also know how to play hockey. Game On.

Haven’t heard that one 20 times

She flagged herself during the fucking safety test

Too hard for a lot of people because we dumb our society so much no one knows how to cook.

Can never go over those rules enough times

I’m not even a gun owner yet (too young) and that’s common sense smh

That's apart of the training

It was the chief firearms instructor of Ontario 🤣😂🤣

Haha, but she got a 94 on the written...if you look down the barrel of a gun on any range I go to you will be immediately banned.

@@michaelburke1116 not true

iliketobuildstuff Lol a guy got PTSD from shooting an ar-15

10 rnds with LAR mag, but small mags are a weird law. With practice, someone can fire and reload super quick, but this does prevent gun violence to a degree.

@@r1-le801 No, magazine restrictions do not reduce gun violence at all.

X C no they don't even in Canada people just buy disassembled mag kits

@@r1-le801 definitely would no stop someone from shooting another person it would just make it annoying as fuck to have fun at a shooting range

lol thier ammo last longer

Yeah constantly dodging bullets out here. 😂

MOST GUN RELATED DEATH'S IN THE U.S.ARE FROM GANG BANGERS,AND ACCIDENT'S,AND COP'S,AND TERROREST.TERROREST BLOW UP 2 TRADES BUILD'ING'S,AND NEVER CAUGHT ANYBODY.AND THEY ARENT EVEN LOOKING FOR ANYBODY,CAN YOU EMAGINE THAT.AND THEY JUMP ON THE BAN WAGON ABOUT A LITTLE GUN.AFTER ALL THE BOMBING'S.WTF..

@@fiddlesticksbessette398 what were you on when you wrote this comment lol

@@weomxd His caps lock key

Well the majority of deaths is suicide and the majority of homicide is from criminals who the vast majority would not be eligible to purchase a firearm legally through a NICS background check. Come on even a Canadian gun owner knows American crap... 😒

ITBS Specialist that is the only part we’re they put facts and I feel the freedom through my veins

you need a reality check my friend. why are you surprised? ever heard of fox news? all new agencies have an agenda to push these days, or some might argue it has always been the case.

When your politics are so partisan that you interpret a segment highlighting different gun laws by state as "pushing an agenda".

@@assassinosproductions3201 that moment when you don't realize some of those facts were wrong. (Background checks for guns purchased online. Still have to have the gun shipped to a FFL.)

@@MittenRomany you still have a long way to go if you want to minimize gun-related deaths....

George Loucadellis I know, I'm just saying, Canada might, just might.

Lunar nag. The us military would obliterate y'all.

Statistically speaking, smaller armies have won roughly 60% of the wars fought throughout history.

4. To liberate Greenland from the Danish and build the civilising light of a Timmies on every corner of Nuuk

well. some of us do own guns for self defense even though we don't really have castle laws. there are plenty of cases of law abiding gun owners in Canada shooting and killing people in self defense. on their own properties

I mean, that clip is shown out of context. It is the last step in verifying a firearm safe, ie pointing the firearm in a safe direction, removing all the ammunition, observing the empty chamber, verifying the feed path is clear, and checking the barrel for obstructions. It is the first thing you learn in the Canadian firearms safety course.

That depends on where you are I suppose. In the danish army looking down the barrel is the very last control of the firearm after having checked mag pouches, mags, and chamber. In that order.

"Former"

@@TownspersonB I did a little check on the rate of accidental gun deaths per 100 000 people between Canada and the US. Rate for US is 0.15, rate for Canada is 0.03. Not saying checking the bore for obstructions in this manner is the reason for this, but it certainly isn't making things any worse.

​@@TownspersonB First of all, the safety course specifies that you clear a firearm in a particular order. If you follow the procedure properly, you're already certain there is no cartridge in the firearm, and it is out of battery, before you inspect the bore. You'd have to be a real moron to look down the barrel of a gun to check if it's loaded, and that's not what's being done. Secondly, as a whole, Canada has fewer accidental gun deaths than in the US. Therefore, looking down the barrel of a gun to verify it is free of obstructions at the very least hasn't caused any serious problems that would skew those statistics. Just as an aside, Americans may think Canada is a gun free country, but there are actually 4x more licensed gun owners than there are hockey players. Let that sink in. Also, I should note, that the number of accidental gun deaths was actually much higher in Canada (around 0.22) before the implementation of the Canadian Firearms Safety Course in the early 2000s. Since then, the rate has never gone above 0.09.

Weak on the research into "deadly force".

The law is written with a lot of grey areas. You need to actually prove that other people in your situation would feel that their life was in imminent danger and the actions you took were appropriate to save your life. Also any by standers would have to agree with your course of actions otherwise that will hurt you. Bottom line, if someone wants to knock the shit out of you they should think twice and I enjoy that about the laws we have in some states. It's all grey, intentionally, for interpretation by lawyers in a courtroom which in legal terminology is called, "Pay Daaayy, MF'ers"!

No background checks at gun shows or online? Where the fuck are you getting that data?

@@combatjm89 tell that to Treyvon Martin.

@haitipi and home of the (only because America defends the whole fu**ing world)freeeeeee

Why they showing me this? Like they just moking Canada rn

@@aidanvillnave4903 Yes like, hey look how restrictive guns laws in CAN are, ooops, someone didn't even follow this shit we will make it even more restrictive.

There are no gun "rights" in Canada. It's a privilege.

Because of reasons

I mean but with good reason right? No real idea why we need AR platform and other similar style firearms right?

Mark M guns... triggered... kek

Jonatas Nogueira Not at all, I have no objection to people owning guns if they are well regulated

Yep..not just Canada-people in Switzerland have as much guns but somehow they're not retarded like the people here..*cough*Mericans*cough*

Shuyu lol,

Eztli Ixtli nice bait bro

Maybe you missed it but there's pretty much nothing to defend yourself from. Violent crime rates in Canada are extremely low compared to the US.

Besides the Castle Doctrine myth, which I had to bust *_YET AGAIN,_* there is another fact that 99.99999999% of Canadians haven't a clue about: Up until about 1969, if you could own a handgun, you could carry it! It had to be concealed at all times in public.

​@@theAV8R there's nothing to defend yourself from until there is. It should be someone's right to defend their own property, despite how low that chance is.

@SendXe totally agree!

@@johnwilliams3982damn who’s the retarded that did that ban

The dead can't testify to those facts.

who cares

Parysk i know. i live in canada and if i shoot a guy who broke into my house i will get arrested and jailtime

Unless you have a ton of enemies can you reasonably suspect that someone breaking into your house wants to harm you? Most B&Es are crackheads who think nobody is home and just wanna steal your TV. Is that worth taking someone's life? I'm not anti-gun, just curious.

Dunning Kruger doesnt matter, cuz if theyre laying there dead with a weapon and came thru a broken window of a house that they didnt own....... it doesnt take a genius to figure out whether or not the homicide was justified. shoot first ask questions last or you or a loved one can get hurt, smartass.

Out dated and fcked up but that's part of the course lmfao

I almost fell over when I saw that shit lol

About shit myself when I saw that!

@@itscrashyy its not fucked up its completely safe if you open the bolt with safety on with an empty chamber. its to check for obstructions you moron

@@Trad-Am probably because youre an idiot

Shadow I find it weird that people don’t know that looking down the barrel is proper procedure to check the bore

@@swiffersweatjet7815 Only time you should be looking down a barrel is during a cleaning, preferably with it removed from the slide/receiver. But, I guess not everyone can know how to properly handle firearms.

Yeaaaaaah, not while it isn't being cleaned and the barrel isn't actually on the gun.

@@alohasnackbarcell8071 it's part of the PAL course, when the gun is clear of ammunition and you have observed the breech and the action is open, you are required to look down the barrel. I know it's weird but it's what the instructors tell you to do.

@@braeeee_ It's just an unnecessary action in regards to safe behavior with a firearm, in most regards. You should always treat a gun like it's loaded, even if you know it's cleared. It's best to train yourself to be careful whenever holding a firearm.

You can keep the ones you have, for now.

Jesus...

DrNapalm woop woop

pepelapiu2004 WTF?

It's to verify that there is no obstruction in the barrel. In some guns, it's not possible to see far enough by looking through the chamber so you check the barrel. I'd prefer to use the cleaning rod, but if you have the action open, the danger is minimal.

Then you use a barrel snake. You never NEVER look down the muzzle end of an assembled firearm. Canada... what a joke.

I know... Like what??

I was just waiting for the fade to black and a loud boom.

I wish it discharged on her ass

As dumb as it looks, it’s actually part of the gun safety course,

@@__NoName__1 to check if its not loaded you dont look down the barrell. Never. Its straight common sense lmao why would it be part of the course?

And she says ‘I don’t have to provide any of this information’... I’m assuming she meant that she answered no to the acquisition questions it’s still weird that she said that

They teach you clear the gun and when it is clear to observe the bore for obstructions like squib loads. Source: I actually did the course and am not just making speculations online.

It's actually part of the course...lol Clear the chamber, then look down the bore for obstructions.

@@ramjet177 That's so weird to me. I was always taught to never point the firearm at anyone. Even when you know the gun is unloaded you always treat it as if it was loaded.

That is the most shocking, asinine thing thing that I've ever seen concerning firearms. LOOKING down the barrel ?? Kidding, right ??

Pepper Shaker Vice used to be a great, full of action, comedic, and an interesting news source. Now they are the opposite.

She used the (F)word 2 times in the 1st 5 minutes of this video

@@martybeckman5178 it made me cry

no shit, eh? she didn't even study!

You're supposed to do that you dummy.

In canada, civilians are taught to look down the barrel of the gun after checking and emptying the chamber to verify that it is clear of obstructions. This is not the case for the military, they are taught the famous "never look down the barrel of a gun".

In boy scouts we were taught to open the breech and make sure there was no bullet in the breech and leave it open before we put down the rifles and walked to the targets. We were allowed to shoot alone unsupervised at the shooting range but never two or more without a scout master present. The point being alone, you can't be accidentally shot by someone else because there is no one else to shoot you.

The Canadian Safety Course has that as its final step to prove the gun safe. It's done after you remove the mag, and check the chamber. It's to make sure there isn't a blockage in the barrel, which can cause serious damage to the user and those around them if the gun is fired in that condition.

Exactly. Even with all these restrictions the Canadian government bascially banning everying and treating anyone with even a sliver of self reliance like they and enemy of everyone around them. Politians that are literally will not even go outside by themselves without being surrounded by people with you guessed it guns.

It's literally what they teach you to do 😂😂

I saw that shit too. You inspect the chamber from the side with the weapon pointed down range. Lol. Shitty instruction. Smh

There was a hard cut right after she did that. They beat her ass

@@ramawindigo7509 most definitely not

@@SkinnySkinch I have a gun license in Canada(possession and acquisition license) So I can promise you. That IS appart of the official test in Ontario.

Probably also very expensive. $1 per small calibre bullet? Maybe $5 per shot for the long-range monsters? I don't know.

Ranges considerably. .22LR can be a couple of cents per round, and that's really the bread and butter round for casual target shooting. Most handgun calibers (9mm, .40, .45, etc) will be in the $0.25 to $0.50 per round range, depending on the specific caliber and the quantity being bought. Shotgun target loads tend to be in that range too. With bigger handguns (.357, .44 magnum) and smaller centerfire rifles (.223, 7.62x39) you start to get close to a dollar a round. Then up towards $1.50-$2.00 for stuff thats good for bigger game hunting and longer range shooting (.308, .30-06, .300WM). Then when you get into the real big stuff (.338, .50BMG), then yeah, $5-10 a shot.

used to be fun till we were made to feel like criminals for going to the range.

ya i loving killing animals its fun seeing things suffer

Not too fun when you're the victim

Fr. A shame, came to the comments to see this

K R Norwegian here: why can’t you buy guns anymore?

Fyst the Canadian prime minister just outlawed a ton of 2nd amendment rights because of a mass shooting in Canada that took forever to stop. He thinks taking the guns from law abiding citizens to be an appropriate answer. In a short response.

K R If people had guns that shooting wouldn’t have lasted nearly as long

@@doccaponedamackman4445 2nd amendments rights? We don't have those rights here in Canada.

I literally just completed my PAL course, and it is part of the procedure. After removing all ammunition, observing the breech and feeding path, you are to look down the barrel with the action open. Extremely counter intuitive, but it is what the instructors ask you to do. If you have a break open/hinge action, you can inspect from the rear.

But yeah, you have to do quite a song and dance here to acquire a firearm.

You literally have too, If you want to legally own a firearm you have to do that. How else would you check your bore of the rifle...

Thank heaven for small favors! @@konradhillenaar6471

@t1tacal Well, if you verified the water underneath was deep enough to break your fall and free of obstructions, yes. Kinda like you verify that the magazine, feeding path, and rear of the bore is empty first before you check the barrel for obstructions.

I hope to move there from Canada someday, it would be nice to be safe and free for once.

and Florida

Florida’s racists first time I heard that maybe your thinking about California sounds more like them

I wish Cali is kinda lame

Me too! Best goddamn state in America!

But I do respect the opinions of anti gun advocates.

Fast_Life the self defence laws of the US with most of the gun laws in Canada would make a good combo

Fast_Life Thank you for being a sensible person with respecting other opinions and not starting a random argument.

Fast_Life You can use reasonable force in canada. Someone breaks into your house with a gun, it's reasonable to protect yourself with a gun. If a young kid steals your Xbox and is on the run, is it reasonable to fill them up with 00 buckshot?

+james mcdonald -- It would be wonderful if every case were so black-and-white, but that's not how it works in the real world. The problem here is that there is a whole lot of grey area between the two cases you listed. What if the person _only_ has a knife or crowbar? What if you can't tell if they're armed or not, like if it were dark or if their hands are hidden? What if there are multiple intruders in your home who are _possibly_ armed, while you're still groggy after having been woken up in the middle of the night? There is simply no easy definition of "reasonable force". What is or isn't "reasonable" can even vary between different prosecutors, judges, and jurors. You might as well be leaving your fate up to the roll of a dice. And even if you're exonerated, you'll still likely be stuck with missed work and significant attorneys fees. The entire idea behind the "Castle Doctrine" in the US is to avoid all these legal grey areas by giving the lawful resident the benefit of the doubt that they had acted in "reasonable fear" for their life. Even if it means a few people use an unnecessary amount of force, it fundamentally boils down to Blackstone's formulation, that "it is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer".

pepelapiu2004 the military style fully semi automatic ar-15 (known by liberals as assualt rifle 15 even though it's armalitos rifle 15) with military grade matte black paint with its high capacity clipazine of 5 rounds

AR does not mean assault rifle, but the AR is an assault rifle. Its in the name "ASSAULT RIFLE". make real arguements next time you bash a political wing you're too dense to understand alec

Is that the same AR15 that shoots a thousand round a second?!?

Brody B yes and its also capable of shooting grenades and was literally designed for military uses

itS aCtuAllY a 75mm STUK fully SemI AuToMaTIc AsSulT GuN COmMoNLy founD oN geRmAn tAnks in WoRlD War TwO

Comparison of how recreational guns affect countries

both but the last one is the funniest

Comparison of what are essentially ethnostates to America, you mean.

Steve Jackson Welcome to VICE

Watch the whole video all the way through, and put yourself in the shoes of someone with zero exposure to guns. It's not trying to push an agenda one way or the other, it just lays out the facts and lets you decide how to react. It's actually a pretty balanced documentary as far as Vice docs go.

You can say that about every vice video.

Welcome to vice.

How so tenuous!?

Which part exactly? I took the course recently.

@Robert Johnson I took it a couple of months ago in Ontario. You can use whatever tool you want really, but if you're just shining a light without looking you might miss a partial obstruction. My course had rods and acrylic bore lights similar to chamber clear flags you would use for storage. My instructor runs a firearms services business and has been an instructor since 1995.

america is going down the same path

Fine for me and everyone I know lol.

Isn't more strict gun laws better so people don't just buy it and start murdering people like at that Florida school a couple years back?

@@markstipe3376 slowly but surely the government wants nothing more than to strip us of our god given rights

It depends whether the seller is licensed or not. Licensed sellers are required to screen buyers at gun shows, but you can easily find unlicensed sellers that aren't required to.

William Trepanier You are talking about private individuals selling off a firearm...From your statement, "unlicensed sellers" can imply something else.

If you aren't a vendor at a gun show, you are not suppose to be selling a firearm on property. Just because someone sold you one doesn't make it okay. Other paying vendors would be pissed. That isn't a loophole, this is just illegal.

Its possible to buy guns at gunshows through non-FFLs with no check in some states. Online absolutely not that's highly illegal you must go through an FFL.

I understand both sides, but I have to side with pro gun guys here, just by terminology. Private sales don't require background checks for certain weapons in certain states. This should not be bunched in with online and gun shows that probably have more FFL dealers than private. On the flip side, people who don't know the laws, just hear that you can find a guy at a gun show... And buy an ak47. They freak out. But the truth is, you can buy an ak47 in some states from a dude in Walmart parking lot... Legally.

Yeah that's 100% BS. You can buy it but you can't take possession of it until you go to an FFL and get the background check done.

Most background for a job are online, type your name,dob,ss number and other stuff.

Limited you read it wrong.

Online deals require a background check in all 50 states to be legal(Federal law). You're right on person to person private sales though.

Actually, all 50 states require some sort of background check and buying a gun online requires you to ship it to a licensed FFL dealer. The statistic you are getting around 5 million is an estimate of PRIVATE SALES which occurs between two independent parties and does have a registration process through a form similar to transferring the title of a car to the new owner.

If you buy from an FFL, yes. If you don't, it doesn't matter if it's required or not, you can't enforce it.

At gun shows yeah unless it's a private seller but they lied about that

try telling that to jimmy down the road who has a 3030 for sell that hes had for a few years and is willing to sell at a flea market

@@0Heeroyuy01 as someone said before, if it is as private seller then it isn't required

@@wolfsworkshop9095 i know,but you are suppose to register it tho

You're so loud of touch, it's crazyou could go be a mental patient and buy a gun here

So shootings are down and stabbings are up and over doses And criminals have guns and we can protect ourselves

And we're double text and And our military can't do anything, and we have less rights, less choices, you tell me what's What's better in canada

I actually live in pay taxes here So I can't be tricked

The guy that cut the guy's head off on the greyhound was out. Like 45 years later, cut this head off from the greyhound

I tried telling someone that just the other day. Its comical that these people are so fucking ill informed.

Wrong. And doesnt even matter. In all private sales in most states, there are no checks. Not at a gun show, not online. And you are missing the point. The point being, that if you want to circumvent a background check, you can.

@@maxmeier532 not wrong. You have obviously never bought a new gun at a gun show ever. Private sales are not for NEW guns, so your point has no weight and has not invalidated my statement in the least.

she just said that Canadian gun laws apply everywhere in the country and US gun laws vary from state to state

@@maxmeier532 But a gun show *isn't* a private sale. Gun shows are when dealers set up shop at a booth or table, and THEN they will background check you on purchase. Oh and as for online sales, if you mean from an FFL, your background is very much checked and the gun must be shipped to a local FFL dealer. Now, places like Armslist or Gunlistings where you can meet local gun owners are more what you're talking about, because the individual will often not ask. They're not an FFL and that's just fine. We live in a free market society that allows us to sell our property. This applies to firearms. However, I have noticed here in Iowa, locals will ask for your permit to purchase a pistol/revolver for any gun sale, even long guns. The reason for this is that the permit is essentially proof that you've been background checked by the county sheriff. There's a lot about the conversation that's being left out here and it's intellectually dishonest, but along will come a weeb with too much time on his hands and two firearms in his collection to inform you. :P

Exactly right. You can also defend your family and nobody would charge you for defending any child.

The RCMP are vastly uneducated about the laws they enforce. In Canada you can defend yourself with equal force. So if someone comes at you with a knife you can defend yourself with a knife, if you use a firearm you might have some explaining to do.

ken damer Finnaly a comment that actually uses proper logic

@@BN-dw9jt, the problem with the equal force rationale is that the weapon used is not the only determining factor in deciding the danger a threat poses. If you pit a 150 lb woman armed with a knife against a 250 lb man armed with a knife, the latter still has a significant advantage. Hence why firearms are called "the great equalizer" - they allow individuals who may be unable to protect themselves to fend off or neutralize a threat that may otherwise overpower them.

@@jpabe9321 I agree because I completely disagree with the equal force law. Also if someone breaks into my house in the middle of the night and I am unable to tell if they are armed or not I am going to shoot regardless, I'd rather be in legal trouble than dead.

Preston Rowe we have to as a part of our safety course

*Edit: for reference, they cut out the "PROV" part of "PROVE" for some reason in the video I'll be the first to admit it feels wrong, but it is ignorant and unsafe NOT to. Per the required canadian gun safety course, you must PROVE your weapon safe: - Point it in the safest available direction - Remove all ammunition - Observe the chamber (make sure it's empty) - Verify the feeding path (make sure there is no ammo in magazines) - Examine the bore. (only after having fully confirmed that the firearm is unloaded) Examining the bore is important, especially if you are a hunter for example, any kind of obstruction in the barrel can lead to catastrophic failure of the gun, and a potential injury.

@@D34THC10CK I know a lad that didn't do that when he went hunting didn't see the slug that was stuck half way down and blew up his 12g to pieces lucky he wasn't hurt cause it was a lot of shrapnel, usually if I have a bolt action I just take out the bolt or if its easy remove the barrel only because trying to flip it in my blind is a bit awkward

Because a firearm with upper and lower separated and nothing in the chamber will just magically shoot you

what if its not safe and you shoot yourself in the head? why cant you point the rifle at a light source like the sun and see if you see light down the barrel from the back

No one said guns weren’t fun.

Also at 20:26 she literally said she feels less scared of guns now.

@@quietman208 because she is holding it you feel very powerful with it on you, you will feel like you can take on everyone trust me I know.

Guns should be terrifying. They are tool designed for the sole purpose of killing something. And I say that as a gun owner.

I'm an American, and I can't buy any of that, because I don't have money for it, because I'm broke... :L

You can't buy bump-stocks anymore. They're dumb anyway. We can buy everything else you listed, with the exception of mags that hold more than 5 or 10rds (10rd AR pistol mags are legal in Canada). Yeah, the mag capacity is stupid, but gun laws anywhere are generally stupid. More to the point, a number of Canadian manufacturers have made products which are basically ARs that get around the restrictions placed on actual ARs. Check out the ATRS Modern Sporter or the Maccabee SLR. Both take all AR parts and accessories, but each one has a proprietary upper/lower that makes them "not an AR" in the eyes of the law. On the other hand, we can have SBRs without a tax stamp/NFA. I have both a 10.5" Norinco AR and a 7" Radical AR, which required exactly the same paperwork as a 16"-20" AR and no additional fees. And my 9" Rem 870 clone didn't require any paperwork at all!

If you get rid of the pistol grip then you can have 10

@walt charamba: Says the geniuses, that look down rifle barrels!🤣

@The Rebound Guy You a CNN reporter? 75% of gun deaths in Canada are suicide, 20% are homicide, 2% are accidental, 1% are by law enforcement, and 1% are undetermined.

really? what happened

@@AW33406 around 10 months ago canada published huge new gun legislation which was very strict

@@AW33406 It got so bad that now they want to prohibit airsofts. It would be illegal to own a replica but legal to own a real firearm

@@user-tq2vy2qs2j Sounds good to us!! 👍🇺🇲

@@Jlird808 What sounds good about that?

Lol fuck.

That's what a rod is for dummy I'm not peaking down shit unless I'm looking down from the chamber not the end of the barrel 😂 this is common sense being an American we don't have to say it, it's unspoken common sense just don't do it.

@@WellGuessThatWasAThing You carry a rod around while hunting? Bore light keeps the action from closing.

walt charamba You are not a clown. You are the entire circus.

@@gungan5822 yes an experienced hunter does. and if for some reason I don't I'll break my gun down before I look down the barrel.

edgajam Dude that's the first check you make to see if there's a round in the chamber duuuhhh XD

edgajam I flinched when she did that.

edgajam she's just completed a gun safety course and did it in front of an instructor. I think she's good

You don't look down a gun barrel, unless you are about to be executed.

No its the last stage in proving ur firearm is safe if u did all 4-5 steps before this properly U KNOW there is no round in the barrel. You have to do this to pass. Your the idiot.

I could care less

keith mc it’s dumb because all guns used for criminal use are from the us it’s not gonna stop shit, Trudeau is just using the Nova Scotia shooting as leverage

@@Knvbgg Yeah after doing some research I can conclude that Canada's gun regulations aren't a threat and the liberals have a fetish for division

Dumbest ban in history.

Yeap, all the ban did is let illegal gun owners keep their guns, the time that the cops & RCMP will need to round up guns many banned restricted guns and so many non restricted guns actually, it could be spent to actually hunt down criminals who own illegal guns.

Its what the course teaches. Which is rediculous.

@@markfrain7897 conspiracy theory, but maybe the RCMP intentionally instituted that last step so that way gun orders would shoot themselves and end up dying, reducing the amount of gun owners in the country.

Seriously why didn't anyone in that room say anything?? If I did that around my dad he'd slap the shit out of me

Before you look down you check the action and breach and make sure theres no round in the chamber, you look down to check for any obstructions, say if you were walking in bushes and something gets stuck. Atleast thats what the course explained.

@@fujinwinds2514 You're an idiot. It's part of the course in Canada. Maybe you should look that information up before making a dumb comment,

Yeah that caught my eye too, wtf!

In Canada we are taught it as a final step after the firearm has been Proved clear to verify that there is not a bore obstruction.

The Cosmoline Crate I honestly think is is quite stupid

use a clear barrel indicator to make sure the barrel is clear.

Gonzolives420 Yes this is the way to go

"They act as if you buy the a gun and take it home on the same day." in my state we do

I'm in Texas, the United States of America.

Missouri and Kanas, I absolutely can buy a gun and take it home the same day. There's also a website where it helps you locate nearby people who want to sell their guns, which won't require a background check.

Matthew Boyd Right. There are websites that do help people find buyers to meet in person for sales. This is not the same as internet sales, which would require a background check with some very uncommon exceptions.

Phil L private sellers are not dealers, therefore meeting one in person for a sale is very different than ordering online and having a gun shipped to your door. the only issue with that is that craigslist doesn't allow firearm advertisements.

You were proud the government was restrictive. Amazing. They can restrict you all in cages and promise you "safety", you will have 0 homicide rate. Would you be proud if they could achieve that?

You where proud that you live In a place that you can't even own a gun or conceal carry for self defense????

Just love watching our country rapidly decline 😭

@@MrWick-fi8vo guns are banned....nuff said....I can't conceal carry and I can only own a gun to sport shoot???yeaaaa no fucking thanks

Yeah then quickly resold it bc she's not a gun person. Said it at the end. She is no defender of gun rights at all. I give her credit but she acts like all guns never do anything good.

​@@ryanramsey9621 theyent to kill

Killing someone isnt justice.

Vicboy129 They're still willing to physically harm or kill another person just to get a tad bit ahead in life. They henceforth forfeit their right to be alive. if it's me or them, they're getting every bullet i have.

self defense is not about justice

dakotagau Thats just an over simplification. What if they are stealing to feed themselves or their families? What if they had no intention to hurt anyone? Having a gun just gives someone the power to make those judgments themselves even when they dont know most of the story so no, it is not justice (though Im not saying it can never be). What the point of a justice system if you can just kill someone you think is going to hurt you or break the law?

Vicboy129 You know damn well that's not what they're stealing for. You can only kill if they are actively posing a threat to you. They don't need to steal. There's this thing called welfare, Low income housing, and food stamps. That's what they're for. So really, the only ones that steal want expensive shit and are willing to forcibly take it from others. No reason in keeping them in society.

Derek Vuong deadass bro she’s thin as fuck

lol

Look at her on Instagram she’s actually cute

@@j_soo whats her insta

@Methamphetameme wtf!

what do u need 5 rounds for. if you can't make a hit 5 rounds then you probably shouldn't own a gun. you don't need automatic fire either. police on the other hand and the military have 30 round mags

Yes, because it's intended for the range, and to prevent shooting with undisturbed auto. Thats why

So no 150 Rd beta mags? That's gay

+noisy boyyy still thinking like a serf

5 rounds for centerfire rifles or if a firearm has a tube or internal magazine then its how many it holds, if its a restricted pistol max is 10 if its a rimfire like 22 or 17hmr then theres really no restriction but only aftermarket mags on market are like 30 rounds.. but! if its a restricted rimfire then max is 10 too

Part of making the firearm safe is to make sure there are no obstructions in the barrel. After you prove there is no ammunition in the magazine or in the chamber you are suppose to shine a light into the chamber and then look down the barrel, that is if you cant look through the chamber. Its stupid but meh.

If the action is open, the danger is negligible. I'd still prefer to use a cleaning rod rather than look down the barrel, but that's really just my early childhood talking when my dad taught me to never look down the barrel.

That's actually what they teach you in the firearms safety training course. If you follow the procedures, the risk is very low, and for certain models it is the only way to check for barrel obstructions.

There are ACTS and PROVE. Check the barbell is the last steps. It is good practice to check barrel abstractions (for unloaded gun) BEFORE you use it on range! You can do it visually (throw chamber if it is possible) or by a cleaning rod. It is impossible to visually check barrel (without tools or disassembly ) for lever action guns. Another words, She does it right.

No, i am a Canadian, and we were trained that way. When she was told to PROVE it was safe its actually an acronym for {P}oint in safe direction, {R}emove all ammunition, {O}bserve the chamber, {V}erify the feeding path, and {E}xamine the bore. What she was doing was examining the bore, at which point if done correctly, all ammo has been removed, and the action is open. Its basically to avoid shooting the gun with a barrel obstruction.

Yeah that's how we were taught in our class, and it was recommended to use a rod if possible. Aside from other comments, there's a few things about this video I don't like. Her saying "I look like I want to shoot someone' when viewing her PAL pic, was offputting and in bad taste.

Actually, I think they edited out the part where she checked the chamber for some moronic reason.

@@konstantinosnikolakakis8125 you can literally check the bore FROM the chamber, these people are STUPID.

It seems stupid, but a bore check is actually part of the safety course. You're supposed to assume it's a break-action during the test. Source: PAL owner

museack Were not all idiots she just one of the odd dumbasses and honestly I don’t know why she did that from when i was 4 years old I knew never to look down the barrel.

Jesse Spencer My baby cousin even knows not to do that

Because she has a Gun.

I don't, I have morals, and I am a Law abiding citizen, but it would put somebody else off from committing that crime upon her, because she is Armed, Also bud, I realise your comment may have been a personal attack upon her, but at the end of the day, she's human like us, has feelings, and there's also people maybe her own age group who might do such a thing, even if you think its unlikely, Other women still face the same threat, and she and other women/people are right to choose items for the purpose of self defence, it makes the world a safer place.

Archer Sterling lmfao you just made my night! hahahah beautiful

Archer Sterling hahahahahz

i totally agree but her kid got kidnapped... that's gotta make you a lil paranoid n loopy lol

Its part of the course you lose points if you dont

Georges Bourgaize you can pull the lever *again* to unchamber the round.

@@ryujinnchair its to chek for obstructions, they are already cleared of rounds they tell us make sure its cleared a few times then chek for obstruction

Fax

I was shocked by this when I did my course too, but what you dont see in the video is you place your thumb in the breach and against the firing pin, (cant fire) and you can then angle light to bounce off your thumb nail and see that the barrel is clear.

Matthew Luchitti So.. ban it because someone who illegally obtained firearms in Canada shot people in Nova Scotia? I don’t see how that makes sense at all. If you watch the video, Canada already has strict laws and it’s supposed to only be used for hunting and target shooting - for sports. It’s a lot like cars. “We don’t need AR15s” = “we don’t need Ferraris”. A lot of people are driving illegally in Canada with suspended licenses or stolen vehicles. Why are cars not getting banned? The way I see it, guns are being banned from responsible, well trained people who take necessary precautions to be safe with them while criminals continue to obtain firearms illegally, regardless of the gun is banned or not.

Matthew Luchitti no, we’re not like the US and that’s why you can’t use guns for self defense. As I’ve mentioned before, guns were supposed to be used recreationally in Canada. Sports cars and baseball bats can be used as weapons and can be just as deadly when put in the hands of the wrong people. As you say about guns, you don’t need those either, but here we are. Funny how no counter arguments aren’t being made for these points I’m making. But I guess guns are scary and we should ban them from responsible owners.

Matthew Luchitti Search Alek Minassian, the man behind the Toronto van attack. (Sorry not a sports car, but this still applies) I just made a reasonable comparison but you fail to explain your reasoning. You just keep saying “guns should be illegal, ban them” I’m not dismissing the idea of making them illegal. I’m not even a gun enthusiast but the arguments made (or lack thereof) by people like you makes me feel like no thought is being made with these suggestions

Matthew Luchitti Like you said, we’re not like the US. They have different gun laws there that I don’t agree with. In some states it is easier to obtain a firearm legally than obtaining a car. We need to look at the gun laws we had HERE prior to the gun ban. Now let’s look at gun related deaths in Canada vs car related deaths. It doesn’t even compare. The problem with what you’re proposing is that yes, criminals will try to get guns over a car, but the laws we had prevent that. If we ban guns all together, they’re still gonna get their hands on them illegally.

@Matthew Luchitti u don't need a car

That can only work if the armed forces of the government are the people, just as if the jury to decide on the guilt of someone are the people. And in this sense I mean recruited on mass as a generalized practice of the population (fancy talk for militia) and elect their leaders.

I love that argument... it made sense when the government had muskets but how is your AR 15 going to protect you against a drone or a tank? Lmao

@@suckmyass3569 The idea of the population being armed as defense against autocracies only works when it is the population that makes up the army and controls that army such as electing their own commanders. If the military is separate from the people yet a strong enough one, it can oppress the people.

@@robertjarman3703 so a military that is organized along similar principles to what the anarchists did in the Spanish civil war. read homage to catatonia if you don't know what I mean.

@@MrThatguy333 Correct, although I'm still not sure exactly how to keep this kind of militia under civilian control. The election of a president as head of state and commander in chief helps, but there are plenty more commanders to consider. Switzerland has the United Federal Assembly elect Generals in the event of true calamities. Also, in order for most people to be willing to join the military on this basis you have to reach dystopian levels of chaos or very artificial national pride often used for nefarious reasons in most cases, very few people join the military in other cases, especially in a healthy society where jobs are secure for most people, people get good educations, and poverty programs are effective, you aren't trying to lure in young often reckless people or otherwise low income or low opportunity people. When you consider modern militaries, remember that most soldiers do not fight at any given time, most are sent in platoons or a battalion at most, most remain at home. So you should consider them working typical professions and enjoy similar ideas to them such as how in the Netherlands soldiers actually join trade unions. It would be easy to imagine soldiers in this context electing commanders who would have strong powers during their command but once off the battlefield, they hold no special rights, and in the battlefield, they enjoy no special privileges of comfort like sleeping quarters, they should live with their comrades, and who after the battle can be removed by their other soldiers and reviewed by the elected bodies the people choose.

CRDANIEL100 True, I’ve never ordered an firearm online and came straight to my door before.

Right? And 100% unregulated open carry in some states. I'll mention that next time I see a "no guns" sign

She can say whatever she wants, but she should be fined for calling it journalism

Does this slow clown look like she can read let alone do research? lol

@@kdash0213 Not in America unless you owned a C&R eligible firearm with a C&R license, an Air gun, or a kit to build a muzzle loader. I call bullshit.

Rajat Roy absolutely wrong information no background checks for online purchases however the firearm must be shipped to an FFL who will conduct the background check before transferring the firearm to the buyer no way around the "gun show loophole" unless it's a face to face transaction between two private parties... Indiana DOES require a license to carry a handgun UNLESS you are in your home or on your property that you own or rent or your place of buisness

they didnt even include new zealand on the graph for gun homicides per day. new zealands population is 4.7 million gun ownership is 250,000 and guns in circulation on a conservative side is around 1.5 million. yet we dont hear anything about new zealand gun deaths because they are rare here.

It is not about right or wrong information checks, it is about information checks, period. When was Canada's last mass shooting?

I was like wtf with no backround checks at expositions? XD

Back in Summer time actually. One of Trudeau's favored ones (the immigrants he values over his own people) shot several people.

Canada is only about 3% black, so that doesn't really happen here. Not yet anyway.

coolguy3100 Excuse you me sir but could you please remove your knife from my stomach please and thank you What so you mean that wouldn't work Canadians are nice :D

If that where to happen. I'm pretty sure the judge at your trial would be like fuck what are the chances of that. let him go.

coolguy3100 it doesn't happen in Canada we are to concerned with our maple syrup harvests

Well... That sounds like an example of reasonable force to me. They did say it depends on the judge, and they're Canadians, not morons, they're human beings too. I'm certain anybody could deem the hypothetical situation you came up with as an example of reasonable force to use a gun.

Believe me, we have our fair share of crime filled cities. I live in the violent crime capitol of Canada.

ZzBiohazzardzZ I guess Toronto, a city with a very liberal government, the largest black population in the country, and etc. But somehow one of the safest cities in the world.

Sincostan Winnipeg?

Well Winnipeg is close enough.

Guys none of that shit compares to Chicago, Compton, NYC, Detroit, Philly, Memphis, etc. Y'all don't have a Mexico importing billions of dollars of drugs. I mean I could go on and on. You go to normal ass average joe blow towns in the U.S. and crime rates are even lower than that of cities in Europe and they get all the sharp sticks and guns they want. That's just the half off of it, 64% of it are fuckin suicides....People blow this shit way out of proportion like a bunch of assholes.

They are just ordering the weapon to get ready for a purchase. They wont give you the gun until you show proof. Also there are a lot of states that require little to no background checks for buying guns which is why we have such high crime rates.

America had high crime rates before background checks were the hip new thing to try to stop firearms crime, which was not too long ago. More like a waste of government resources, and tax payer money! Not to mention unconstitutional. (And an inconvenience to some consumers)

Alex Sweers That is just more reason to have background checks. Waste of government resources and tax payer money? Do you think saving lives and preventing bad people from getting guns is a waste of money? A small inconvenience and a little time taken up to insure you are safe is worth protecting the lives of innocent people. It is not unconstitutional. Where in the constitution does it say that criminals, mentally handicapped, and people with sketchy history are entitled to guns?

Absolutely, even if there is no question background checks do save lives, they are not worth it. Where do you draw the line? Wearing helmets while driving cars would likely save lives. Why not require that? The second amendment reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." So there it is. Felons could have guns before 1968 in the US, and it wasn't bad then AFAIK. If someone is considered too dangerous to even possess a gun, why are they free? Let them have all the freedoms everyone else has after they pay their debt to society, or keep them locked up.

Alex Sweers Wearing helmets while driving aren't necessary because we have seat belts. The main causes of death or injury in car crashes are whip lash and flying 60 miles per hour out of the windshield. You only get head injuries if you are not wearing a seat belt or if your air bag doesn't deploy and your head hits the steering wheel or something. It would likely never cause death just some bruises and maybe a concussion. The well regulated militia thing was written 200 years ago where they couldn't have their military or law enforcement to protect them at a moments notice (within 10 minutes at least). Back then they needed guns to protect against any invasion or crime because no one would be able to help them. Also before 1968 the entire world was different. War, disease, technology, culture, and economy all contributed to the mindset of those people and how they acted. We live in different times. We need to worry about the problems of today not the problems yesterday. I can't answer that last question. I don't know why the criminals are free. Maybe it has something to do with out mass incarceration and prisons being so full. I have no idea. But time and time again we find people investigated by the FBI, people with terroristic backgrounds, people with mental disorders, and normal people that turn bad just from societal pressures go mad and kill others for the sake of killing, to end the life of someone they hate, or to some how gain from it. Background checks and gun regulation won't work instantly. It may take a decade or 2 to see any dramatic changes unless we take away all guns from people which would never happen and be a stupid thing to do. We just need to have these restrictions for our children so that when they grow up they don't have to deal with the same burden we have. Good people call still get guns! Nothing will ever stop them from owning or using a gun safely. Spending extra time buying guns is worth saving even a single life. Would you be willing to sacrifice you or your families life so people would be able to buy their guns more quickly? I would never do that and I'm certain nobody in America would. We should still have open carry though I see nothing wrong with that as long as the people are already checked. The magazines for guns need to be as low as Canada's. We shouldn't make it easier for people to go around and perform mass shootings if they please.

What kind of dumbass would buy a gun without federal forms? That's just asking for trouble

Actually in Virginia you don't need any "federal forms" if you buy it from a private seller or individual... this is one fact the left doesn't get wrong until they say its a "gun show loophole" cause it happens outside of gunshows more so than in them... you aren't even required to register your firearms in Virginia which I support but yeah... there's no paper work involved with private sellers unless they want it... and if they don't want it... they won't face any legal repercussions... unless the gun is stolen or something

It really depends on the state when it comes to private party sales. Some states do require private party sales to go through a FFL. However, most states private party sales are unregulated, although a bill of sale would be very smart.

wrong. in florida, private sales are legal and require no paperwork. just as they should exist. as long as you verify the gun isnt stolen and record the transfer, like taking pictures of eachothers ids and a note explaining the sale with the serial number on it. this is how it should be.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-z-kXeI8ibOE.html

You missed it man, they can't shoot anyone lmao. You could break in and beat the living fuck out of someone and they can't legally shoot you

@Fascisté français canadien "common sense", something your legislators lack

I was looking for this comment👌

Some makes sense, some doesnt

why would the average person need a firearm? I mean in america crime is crazy but a part of that is guns are so easily accessed

that's the point, its a gun, it's a pain in the butt to get your drivers licence

@@QuadersXL In Canada, I assume? I'd say the average person absolutely does not need a firearm, which I am grateful to say. Which is why recent bans are ridiculous because legal firearm owners do not contribute to crime statistics.

Thats not true at all in most states. You can meet someone in a parking lot to exchange guns for cash as happens all the time through sites like armslist.com. Theres only a minority of states like Cali. that require what youre describing which is to have a licensed dealer as an intermediary in a private sale.

Thats not an internet sale.

Chris Co That's a private sale you sheep.

The online sales the OP was referring to make up a very small portion of online firearm transactions. The majority are private sales facilitated online through gun swap sites with no BG check or regulation. You can get caught up on a technical definition of an online sale if you want... or you can wake up to the fact theres literally no regulation for the majority of firearm sales made through online media.

genius.