How to CLAIM "Exempt" on your W-4 to LEGALLY TAKE HOME MORE PAY in these times of economic HARDSHIP!

Подписаться 162

50% 1

in this video I explain how you can claim "Exempt" on your W-4 to take home more pay in these times of economic hardship created by the Bidenflation of Bidenomics. We review the controlling statutes, the relevant history, the collection at the source of tax under the "withholding" powers of both the 1913 Subtitle A income tax collectors (Withholding Agents), and the 1945 Subtitle C employment tax collectors (employers), and provide you with a source for an exemption Form, and for further, more exhaustive and detailed information on the subject.

Опубликовано:

17 апр 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 5

@IdioCrazy Месяц назад

First one here!

@tiger05rtc Месяц назад

The form says I HAD a RIGHT to a refund of all tax, which is true- you HAD that right that you gave up when u filled out a W4. So the form uses word trickery but not an outright lie as you state. Also what is your interpretation of the word “includes, or including”?

@Thomas-Freed Месяц назад

My opinion doesn't matter because it is now a term that is (improperly) defined in law at IRC Sec. 7701(c) :"." in 1913 the term "includes" was limiting, and was deemed - : it was limited to only those things listed in the statute. But that didn't work for the socialist judges who kept enlarging the "included" terms based on common language and inferred or assumed inclusion to include the 50 states where not included by statute (Sec 7701(a)(10)) and to include "" where included by statute (Sec. 61), ignoring the language where they are included (Sec. 1441(b)). That of course caused REAL problems in the courts for the judges, so they had Congress write the statute above (7701(c)), which of course now means that the statutes don't really mean what they actually say, or what Congress wrote, but whatever the seditious judges say it means by inferred . REAL SEDITION AT WORK in the federal judiciary .They are lying to you to enslave you. See: www.tax-freedom.com/1939%20IRC%20-%20Special%20Classes%20made%20subject.pdf

@ironhorse944 Месяц назад

I have essentially done this with the W-4 and the IRS of course doesn’t like this and finely asked my employer to backup withhold without any proof or court orders, my employer just complied with the request and now I’m working on taking them to court for violation of my due process rights…

@Thomas-Freed Месяц назад

SUE the IRS & the employer in State court for unlawful conversion, NO due process, and involuntary servitude. Once removed to federal court it cannot be dismissed from the federal court, but must be remanded back to the State court if there's no jurisdiction in the federal court. And then demand (in discovery) that they produce the Treasury deposit receipts required under Sec. 7809, for the collected "tax" they took from you. (They dont exist because no money went in the Treasury (that's FRAUD).) Then agree to let the employer off the hook in the suit in exchange for testimony that they were acting ONLY under command of the IRS TO TAKE YOUR MONEY WITHOUT USE OF ANY LAW AND ONLY BASED ON THE IRS AGENT'S UNLAWFUL COMMAND to do so. YOU'RE NOT legally subject to BACKUP WITHHOLDING BECAUSE NO TAX IS OWED FROM PREVIOUS "ENCOUNTERS" (IRS collections). That's a LEVY - WITHOUT any LEVY paperwork, legal process, or due process.