Тёмный
No video :(

How To Create Doubt For A Not Guilty Verdict! A Former Prosecutor Gives Away The Secrets! (2023) 

Hampton Law
Подписаться 266 тыс.
Просмотров 6 тыс.
50% 1

#criminaldefenseattorney #criminallaw #reasonabledoubt
Arrested in Texas? Get a Free Case Analysis: www.criminalat...
Free Guides:
What to Do When You've Been Charged in Texas: www.criminalat...
Ultimate Guide to DWI Defense in Texas: www.criminalat...
What to Do When Charged with Domestic Violent Crime: www.criminalat...
How to Beat a Drug Charge in Texas: www.criminalat...
That can be a good and bad thing - it is bad because we don’t have a standard. However, it can be good for a seasoned criminal defense attorney that knows how to craft a persuasive discussion in jury selection to persuade jurors to find doubt around every corner.
Think about it - the prosecutor, the judge and the defense attorney will tell you the standard to convict someone is proof beyond a reasonable doubt but they don’t define what that means. In practice, it will mean whatever that individual juror wants it to mean - you get what I’m saying?
With that in mind, there are several jury selection techniques that can be used by experienced criminal defense attorneys that will provide a strong defense at the very beginning of a trial to give you the best chance of receiving a not guilty verdict.
I am going to give you some examples of how to weave the presumption of innocence in with the government’s burden to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt to achieve a not guilty verdict.
Let’s start by examining an example of a murder case where self-defense is being argued. Here is an argument we have used and an example of a conversation we have had with a juror during jury selection:
Ms. Jones is not required to prove anything in this case, not even that she shot in self-defense. In fact, the district attorney is required to prove that Ms. Jones did not shoot in self defense. Why? Because in our country, a person charged doesn’t have to prove anything. Does that surprise you
Ms. Peterson? What do you think of that?
Presumption of innocence - someone is presumed innocent, what does that mean to you? Presumption means that we believe that she is innocent. The word “believe” is what it is about, we believe her to be innocent.
It’s hard to believe someone innocent because we have never met Ms. Jones, heard from her, had lunch with her, etc. How do we presume her to be innocent? Is that hard to do?
We don’t really do that - we presume them to be guilty - we read in the paper that they were charged and we say “that dirty dog.” We just assume that the district attorney’s office only prosecutes guilty people and that the press or police always charge the right people. I will admit that is how my mind works - I say, hey look what he did, not what he was charged with.
Insert examples of Duke Lacrosse team, the Jon Benet Ramsey parents and the Innocence Project exonerating many life sentences.
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt (more) - the life of Ms. Jones rests on your understanding and application of these words and your definition of those words in your mind. Can you think what it might be like to have your life or future rest on the definition of 3 simple words? How would that feel? What does it mean to you Mr. Juror? Already we see the confusion. Imagine how Ms. Jones feels when Ms. Jones hears each of you give different meanings to these words? Have any of you gone to bed at night and just as you are going off to sleep, you wake up and wonder if you set the alarm to wake up in the morning? You say that you remember setting the alarm and the numbers on the clock to set, you know you set the alarm. Then why are you questioning it? The law does not permit me to give you a definition of beyond a reasonable doubt. However, will you make the prosecution prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt?
Can you envision the time when you go back to the jury room at a large table and you just elected a foreperson and you begin deliberating and someone says, Ms. Jones claims that she shot in self-defense but she didn’t prove anything or bring any evidence or take the stand - so I vote we find her guilty. If someone said this to you, what would you say to them? Wouldn’t I hear you say something about the law stating that Ms. Jones doesn’t have to prove anything and the prosecution has to prove it?
00:00 How To Create Doubt For A Not Guilty Verdict!
00:25 Jury Selection Is Critical!
01:42 No Definition For “Beyond A Reasonable Doubt”
03:52 Murder Case Arguing Self-Defense
04:47 “How Do You Feel About That…”
06:10 Duke Lacrosse Team Example
6:34 Jon Benet Ramsey Case
11:22 Strike For Cause
11:30 Peremptory Challenge
15:34 You Only Need 1 Juror!

Опубликовано:

 

15 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 24   
@bluesfan51
@bluesfan51 4 месяца назад
I really like this guy, he's a good educator.
@kenjjjjjjmmmm
@kenjjjjjjmmmm 6 месяцев назад
To the narrator, you strike me as an excellent lawyer.
@bondedcastaway3085
@bondedcastaway3085 Год назад
I actually needed this for my upcoming trial
@hamptonlawfirm
@hamptonlawfirm Год назад
So happy this can help! Good luck in trial!
@mccaslincole85
@mccaslincole85 Год назад
Good luck
@bondedcastaway3085
@bondedcastaway3085 Год назад
@@mccaslincole85 case was dismissed
@user-hx2vt4on4i
@user-hx2vt4on4i 7 месяцев назад
​@@bondedcastaway3085what was the case you were being accused of may I ask
@mclome22
@mclome22 6 месяцев назад
@@bondedcastaway3085what did you do?
@bryanhoward358
@bryanhoward358 Год назад
Its funny u say that about jurors automatically believing the person is guilty because most people think like well they were arrested so they must have done it!! Its actually scary if u think about it!
@lenaely6146
@lenaely6146 8 месяцев назад
Absolutely absurd. Which is why American courts need to be closed. No one deserves to be stuck with such foolishness. I comment that as a woman who has been arrested numerous times by bribed/corrupted cops on totally frivolous charges.
@mlpdunaway
@mlpdunaway 10 месяцев назад
Wow! What an educational video! Absolutely amazing! Tysm!
@hamptonlawfirm
@hamptonlawfirm 10 месяцев назад
You're so welcome!
@lenaely6146
@lenaely6146 8 месяцев назад
👍🙂 nice I argued a completely bogus criminal trial pro se. I have been mentored by attorneys to practice law pro se 😊 and i did well but i went through trial completely on a whim and no real experience or training just for the opportunity/experience. The prosecutor had promised to drop all charges and they were extremely frivolous anyway. But, to abuse her prosecutorial power, we wound up in trial with a judge equally corrupted/biased against me to allow a completely frivolous case to go to trial and exculpatory evidence be withheld. I think these voir dire /jury selection tips could have made my case more effective. Even without zero training and understanding, I convinced the jury to argue among themselves for days on end 😊😅
@alicia8210able
@alicia8210able 3 месяца назад
right on!
@thetrueyorker
@thetrueyorker Год назад
The analogy in medicine is when you have a complex surgery and ask 12 random people to perform it rather than a doctor who spent at least 12 years perfecting the craft. Jurors must have some kind of legal training and a minimal IQ, not some idiots from the street.
@kristeneichhorn6913
@kristeneichhorn6913 Год назад
Unfortunately we are supposed to be judged by a jury of our peers, and most people are stupid. Therefore we end up being judged by morons
@user-hx2vt4on4i
@user-hx2vt4on4i 7 месяцев назад
Like your content. Hometown is ft worth. Good to see lawyer with such good advice coming out of tarrant county
@carolineconnor6214
@carolineconnor6214 8 месяцев назад
Now, with the Supreme Court's ruling concerning Ruan, will help innocent doctors free, hopefully. Unless lower courts withhold explanations to jurors regarding Ruan's, that is. Thenvwhat, appeal!!!
@roberthall6161
@roberthall6161 Месяц назад
I have been good at it.
@TheGorillaboytv
@TheGorillaboytv Год назад
Good video
@hamptonlawfirm
@hamptonlawfirm Год назад
Thank you! We appreciate you watching!
@rocketman6973
@rocketman6973 Год назад
Years ago I was selected for jury duty, my first time, got a DUI case. The prosecution presented ample evidence of the defendant driving recklessly at high speed, running a Sheriff's car off the road, finally stopping the guy, the failed field sobriety check, video of the defendant in the booking room where he couldn't even give his name and address. He refused a blood test, which if I remember correctly was admission of guilt in that state. The defense presented all of the reasons why you might fail a field sobriety test for other reasons such as having a physical disability, etc., introducing doubt. I was elected foreman and called for a vote before we deliberated. Several jurors voted to acquit based on the defense's presentation. I was shocked, he was so obviously guilty. There was all this evidence against him, but none in his favor other than a theory that he might have one or more of these other conditions. So I asked the simple question, where is the positive defense? If he had a physical disability, why didn't the defense present evidence of it such as medical records? We deliberated for a bit and took another vote, unanimously guilty. I think this is an example of what you're talking about and was so surprised that this tactic almost worked. Another jury might have bought the defense's theory.
Далее
Is Skynet watching you already?
1:04:00
Просмотров 1 млн
Fancy VS Classic #shorts  @CRAZYGREAPA
00:33
Просмотров 788 тыс.
ROLLING DOWN
00:20
Просмотров 7 млн
Reasonable Suspicion - Prosecutor Explains
20:24
Просмотров 43 тыс.
What is Jury Nullification? - Lehto's Law Ep. 5.57
19:34
What is Beyond a Reasonable Doubt?
5:17
Просмотров 3,2 тыс.
Fancy VS Classic #shorts  @CRAZYGREAPA
00:33
Просмотров 788 тыс.