This is an excellent approximation! I'm a stickler for the math here, it's off by .001 times the length of the paper. Which is about the thickness of a sheet of paper in the first place, so totally not worth worrying about. Great job!
bro .1% is not noticable no one fucking cares u motherfucker. why did u mention it in the first place if u were just gonna say that it wasnt worth worrying about, you son of a whore?
@@paddyschott9412 I work in mathematics, and there's an importance to precision in math. Rounding errors are usually negligible in most cases, but sometimes can compound into much larger problems. I believe it's important to acknowledge errors and then evaluate whether it's worth caring about. In this case, it's such a good approximation that I'd personally rather use it instead of a different method that might be more precise, but could cause more creases on the paper. My purpose in saying it's an approximation is mostly to highlight just how good it is!
@@wavebreakerr142 Nice for some, but I'm trying to get a 10th of an inch by using a piece of paper that is 2 square inches and dividing it into 20. So, my method needs a little bit more precision.
I was so happy to find this video, I had not found another one that showed me how to divide the paper without crease lines. Bravo and thank you for sharing this!!! I'm into fold tessellations and it's perfect for 20 and 24 grid squares and so on.....
Thank you so much for this video, I still can't figure out how the three triangles folding is related (guess it's to figure out each cell's height) but damn man, this is fantastic.
@@EzOrigami OMG a RU-vidr actually replied to one of my comments on their video. That's so cool! I'm glad you'll consider my suggestion. Keep up the quality content! I look forward to seeing what you post next!
@@ahmedshaikha8938 Oh that's a good idea too. It'd be nice to see a tutorial on that if he could handle it but his math in these past 2 videos has seemed a little off so I guess we'll see what happens.
