How to Get Out of ANY Ticket in Court 99% of the Time 

is it illegal to cuss at a cop?

is it legal to cuss at a cop

Is it ok to cuss at a cop

Your videos are such a blessing to common people. Thank you

Loud exhaust ticket tips

Simple, it's worth beating or else your insurance goes up.

If the cops didn't want me to be a nuisance, then they shouldn't have issued me a citation.

@@ajm5007A recently calibrated radar gun showed that you, during active hours, went 350mph in a school zone! How the fuck is that even possible????

@@eeeeee8762 The radar gun was not calibrated properly

@@eeeeee8762”…your honor I plead the fifth”

Unless they do and you just end up ruining their day lol

@@SALTrobot meh, they ruined your day by giving you the ticket.

​@@SALTrobotshouldn't have pulled me over then

Oooh evil I like it

​@@LWLProductionsNot when you are trying to get out of a ticket and avoid insurance going sky-high...

Sounds fishy to me. We've seen before many times that police departments hold vendettas against random people for some of the most mundane things. I wouldn't put it past them to hunt you down and pull you over for some BS charge just to be able to re-add that previous ticket in a way you couldn't contest. If you knew you had a guaranteed win, I would have just took that instead of a "IF" for a set amount of time bs.

@@naefaren3515 Fair point but it worked out in my case. This was over 15 years ago and I completed the terms of the diversion program with no issues.

They do that because it is a conviction, and if you get stopped again for something you didn't do then they can charge you for both... and because you took the deal, you can't argue it any longer. it is a win-win-win-win for them.

@alexharker7223 big mistake, never accept a deal because it SEEMS EASY. If you're NOT GUILTY fight like hell.

lol.

Genius. I had the same thing happen to me one time. Cop said I was speeding in a construction zone. I didn’t have insurance in the glove box and he just wrote me up for no insurance and gave me a “warning” for speeding. I emailed the court proof of insurance and they dropped it immediately

Could the officer still write you up for lying about not having insurance afterwards?

@@aj7978 doubtful. The cop is most likely not going to show up in court and it’s be hard for them to prove you lied.

@@aj7978 How would they prove that you had insurance papers in your car, and you pretended to not find them?

My state has a citation for “no proof of insurance on person”. Even if you are insured, you can still be cited.

No way

It's why I'll never respect policing as an institution. You can always leave it up to government to not practice what they preach.

They should have never consented to the search of their vehicle. That was the biggest mistake imo.

Love victim blaming

​@tunahanyilmazdev not victim blaming,just saying what they shouldnt have done so others dont make the same mistake

I genuinely burst out laughing thinking about this, it would probably be on a monday too just to top it off haha

then the fun can start all over

I remember watching a video years ago about a guy getting off of a murder rap by a technicality. He walked out of the court room, tripped, and fell on a pen. He was declared dead at the court room.

Imagine doing all this just for the judge to find you guilty.

i mean your local police department isnt going to go easy on you if you did all of that especially if they recognize you, i can imagine them trying to get you for going just barely over the speed limit after that

In Ca it’s not required to show you or tell you it’s calibrated. You have to go to court to get that info

The technology angle doesn't really work in small towns, especially where they will let the officer's eyes count as reliable evidence.

Imagine a world where police actually spent time patrolling and protecting neighborhoods against real criminals instead of camping in speed traps targeting normal citizens.

I got one similar, the cop said he had to speed to catch me thus I was speeding. Ofcourse the basics …like my speed is not the speed you’re driving at ….didn’t work in court.

@@NTJedi you do realize that most of the time those traps are set up because people in your area complained about speeding through that zone right? I don't think you realize how much cops DONT want to do paperwork. I guarantee you theyd rather be out there protecting your neighborhood against real criminals.

@@ego7759 I had a motorcycle cop drive between cars and go thru a red light which was red 3 seconds to give me a speeding ticket.

@@ThatGuy-nv7cx The problem is not speeding traps... the problem is police NEVER patrol neighborhoods anymore because they spend all their time camping at speeding traps. This is why porch pirates confidently drive around neighborhoods during the daytime.

I've gotten a ticket 4 times and the cop didn't show up. I got a ticket right before covid and the courts kept changing dates. I once showed up and got a ticket on the way to court and there was a note on the door saying court was cancelled due to the virus, I ended up negotiating paying the lowest amount for 1 of them and the other was dismissed and I only did that because they'd suspended my license for not showing up for court dates they kept changing. In this area cops rarely ever show up to court, but I needed to have another surgery and didn't feel like coming to court again, they agreed to not ding my driving record and charged me $25, the ticket was over 3 years old.

And how much time did it cost you for the officer to not even show up?

Hell yeah man, the cosmic energy is funny like that sometimea. Take the "W" and the so-fresh, so-clean record (either way?) 🎉

Sadly, I had a corrupt judge. I used the calibration trick and the cop brought a cert that was dated in January for calibration and my ticket was in June. In Colorado, when I looked it up, it was supposed to be calibrated every shift before use if it was used the previous shift. He even brought a "photo" of the gun at the alleged speed. I looked at it an saw that it was a white car speeding while I was driving a white truck... The judge still sided with the cop... corruption trumps logic and truth sadly. Still was fun showing everyone present in the court room how stupid and corrupt the cop and judge was

@@YouDontKnowMe-qd2mc at trial I came to court with appeals documents, I knew that it'd be overturned, there was no evidence, the judge tried to get me to accept a plea, that right...the judge, not the prosecutor, end the end he knew that he'd be overruled and found me not guilty, but stuck it to me on the speeding ticket.

Sick win, GG bro

“A speedy trial”. Lol. Now that is ironic.

"told the judge that my constitutional right was violated for a speedy trial. My ticket got dismissed almost after 3 years." For all the listeners at home, this is an absolutely valid way to win. The video is not JUST saying be a nuisance to the cops, but also look for ANY and EVERY technicality that could possibly be used to get your case dismissed. People who are guilty of crimes get away with it all the time due to technicalities such as improperly filed paperwork, poor record keeping on the prosecution's side, minor civil rights violations, and other things that have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with what you're being tried for. Lawyers make mistakes all the time regardless of who they work for (the government OR the client), same as cops. Also, IF YOU ARE GOING TO CITE ANY CASE LAW YOU MUUUUST HAVE THE CORRECT CITATIONS TO PROVE THAT IT SAYS WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING IT SAYS! Don't just say "the supreme court saaaayyyyys blah blah blah" , you have to say "393 U.S. 503 states that 'blah blah blah' and that applies EXACTLY to my case because [reason]." And if you're citing case law you BETTER be sure you're using it correctly. No going out on a limb, it needs to clearly apply to you with minimal to zero room for disagreement. Cite specific laws first THEN worry about case law.

@@exodeus7959 It really is pretty ridiculous. A speedy trial is one of our very few specifically guaranteed constitutional rights and it is not taken seriously at all.

@@drfarrin Unless the state supreme court had ceased speedy trials due to covid. I think this was dismissed because the charge was before the speedy trails pause took effect.

They discovered that there was something wrong. That's why they didn't give them to you when you first asked.

Many people don’t realize they don’t need a lawyer. Just go and ask for traffic school. That’s what the lawyer does. Saves you 2-300 bucks

RULE #1: STay out of Illinois. Rule #2: Stay out of Chitcago. However, if you're caught in chitcago, get a lawyer. I was falsely arrested by a couple of idiot chitcago cops one night for passing them. They pulled out right in front of me and proceeded at about 5mph scanning the yards to the right with spotlight. I slowed behind them, put my turn signal on, there was no oncoming traffic, pulled out and around with signal again. BAM! Stopped. Arrested. I represented myself on pretrial motions. The traffic court judge quickly demonstrated his hatred for me and ruled against me on everything, despite mountains of evidence and all precedent in my favor. I got scared. I thought this clown is going to literally put me in jail for 364 days for passing an idiot cop! Hired traffic court lawyer, the lowest of the low. Went to bench trial. Officer Mohammed got up and started immediately perjuring himself. I was terrified. I figured the judge would believe everything he said. I was 29-30 years old. He testified I was 54 years old. I drove directly into the path of dozens of oncoming cars, at a high rate of speed, etc. It was TERRIFYING. My lawyer said something about my driver's license and the judge said "dismissed." Despite my law degree and decades of experience, I still have NO IDEA what happened. Since it was chitcago, I suspect that about 1/3 to 1/2 of the amount I paid my traffic court lawyer ended up in Judge COrrupt's pocket. But no kidding, no matter how smart you are, a lawyer makes the difference.

That's what traffic ticket attorneys do 95+% of the time - talk to the prosecutor (who they're on a first name basis with and sometimes even have lunch with from time to time) and negotiate a deal where you end up paying the same amount of money as the ticket, but your insurance doesn't find out. It's all a big racket.

Not very good evidence since it can easily be dismissed as being inaccurate. Unlike a radar gun, they can’t be calibrated and won’t hold up, unless it shows you going too fast and then it will be used against you if you try to prove anything with the video. Best to turn off the speed portion.

Judge will rule your dash cam as inadmissible. Ask me how I know.

I agree. I have a dash cam in every car in my household. Dash cams are extremely beneficial in accidents to show who was in the right and in the wrong. My speed with the gps on my smartphone (Waze app) is in agreement within 1 mph of my car’s speedometer. So GPS is fairly accurate.

@@iamtheoffenderofall Then why do the police use those dash cams in those police chase videos on RU-vid to show how fast they (the said police car) were going in the hot pursuit if the gps is sooooo bad??? In reality gps based speed is within 2-3 mph of one’s ‘real’ speed. If the police said I was going 70 on a 55 zone, but my dash cam says I was going 59, and btw if it showed another car of similar color to mine passed me like I was standing still right before the rear dash cam recorded the blue lights, then the dash cam could be used to prove he pulled over the wrong (insert the color of your car: gray) car. Indeed there was a gray car speeding but it was not mine and here is video proof.

@@akidwaimd false. In the courts eyes there are two criminals, one was just going faster than the other and you just showed yourself guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The cop could have said you were going 1,000 mph but as soon as you break out the gps saying 56 you’re considered guilty.

Cop: “Chief, I’d like some training on the law to make sure I’m doing my job right.” Police Chief: “What?! We’re relying on you to not know the law, Officer, that way you issue tickets people won’t fight, and arrest people who can’t get a good lawyer. The more people we arrest, the more it seems like we’re doing a good job and deserve raises.”

@@LuckyCharms777 Chief: Don't worry about the law. If you screw up, you're 100% protected by qualified immunity.

Imagine if police actually were patrolling and protecting neighborhoods against real criminals instead of using speed traps targeting normal citizens.

@@NTJedi A bit difficult to do I'd venture, as cops are the "real criminals".

@@NTJedi Imagine if you understood that cops arrest many real criminals after catching them speeding. Just why do you think the cops ask people a million questions and want to search their car? It’s easier to catch/imprison Joe Burglar with drugs in his car than it is to catch him in the act of burglary. Just who do you think cops are taking to jail when you see them on the side of the road with a guy in cuffs. Many of these people also have warrants for real crimes, but the police haven’t been able to find them or don’t have the resources to look for them. So just like most things in life, there are pros and cons to govt road pirates too.

sure, but punishing innocent people is wrong.

Maybe cops should stop abusing power and skating around penalties due to qualified immunity.

@@alicevioleta3184 just because you got out of a traffic violation doesn't mean you're innocent.

You think courts are there for our safety ???? Lmao you’re clueless if you think so. Just like hospitals, courts are in to make money whether you lie to believe or not.

@@raz802 maybe people should be scumbags and break the law. Maybe you shouldn't be so stupid and lump all cops together. Maybe you shouldn't take something that happens every once in a while and act like it is common. Maybe you shouldn't be so gullible. Maybe you should get smarter.

I don't know where you live but in Nebraska you have to pay court costs even if you're found innocent or if the prosecutor drops all charges before court. I had a cop tell me he was giving me a warning for speeding, then handed me papers which turned out to be tickets for no insurance or registration even though I gave him valid insurance and the car was registered. I went to the attorneys office, showed her the paperwork and she agreed that the cop had no reason to give me tickets, dismissed them, and then told me I still had to pay a $40 court fee for the pleasure of being falsely accused.

@@DRAT311Then that is theft, charge the officer with kidnapping, felony perjury, conspiracy to commit a felony ( multiple counts for last 2 because of signing the falsified government form )... then file a civil lawsuit for violating your civil rights and attempting to take your time without compensation, and asking you to pay for a crime you didn't commit.

​@Acecool except you can't charge anybody with anything. The prosecutor is the only one that can charge someone and they aren't going to charge the blue line gang members. You can try the civil suit but it is very expensive and time consuming and chances are the judge won't allow it to go to court anyway. Our judicial system is very broken and unfair.

@@ned6938 You can press charges.. ie charge someone with crimes. Whether or not the corrupt and tyrannical terrorist regime complies, even when the law says felonies are non-negotiable and require an arrest... that's up to them.

How would you talk to the prosecutor do you just go to court

@@timb8652 no need to be rude man

@@timb8652 now that's just disrespectful to all the good cops out there. Sure i agree that there are some disgusting cops but you should never generalize an entire group of people just because some of the people inside the group is evil.

@@timb8652Some cops are bad and I agree with that, but the mentality that since 2% of a group is bad all of them suck is so stupid. That’s why I hated that ACAB thing and whatnot, it seems very predjudiced. I’m all for black people too, since I am one and all, but the George Floyd protests also got pretty iffy when they just started commiting crimes and attacking officers, ones that were prob arresting them for the crimes instead of the protesting

@@timb8652You mad you got ticketed for going 12 miles over?

@@timb8652 Seethe

How often is this?

@@WeLiveWeDie depends on the district and the cop. Some of them are lazy, or are ignorant of their procedures.

Doesn't work in all states. Here in TX they technically can turn in their copy any time up to the court appearance date printed on the ticket, which is typically 3-4 weeks ahead of the day of citation. I found that out when one dumbass cop pulled me over for a missing front license plate and NEVER turned in his copy. My consolation prize was having the whole thing dismissed, but I had to wait a month to find out I didn't have to pay it.

Right, that's why I said to check your local laws. Still. Cops have to be certified on the radars/lasers they use. Those devices also need to be tested routinely and certified. If those certifications are not up to date, chance you get the ticket tossed. I learned a whole lot about radars and their calibration methods. @@idontneedthis66

@@idontneedthis66would I need to request a court hearing for this to work out though or can I asked the status of the ticket before making a request for a hearing in court?

did you go into law?

@@draxgaming8901 he got a sixer and drank with his buddies.

Did everyone in the courtroom clap?

And then Albert Einstein and Barack Obama stood up in the court in the clubbed to give you a standing ovation😂😂😂

I am not sure if you are implying I was dreaming, but this really happened. @@Wrathsack

Should have brought a harassment suit against that officer.

A formal complaint was filed

​@@TheMoody876I just filed one against an officer. how did yours turn out?

He was fired

@@TheMoody876 🥴😵

You can tell the judge that the officer who accused you of the crime isn't in the room if that ever happens. Case dismissed.

I'm fairly sure it's (federally) constitutionally fine for a non-witness to prosecute a traffic violation (check your state constitution, and there might be a regular law or court thing). The other officer will only have notes and other secondhand evidence to go off of though, so it'll probably be easier to question the evidence provided.

@@reddragonflyxx657it’s violating your right to face your accuser a stand in isn’t your accuser

@@Cody-5501 Is it a civil or criminal ticket/proceeding? Is the officer providing witness testimony or are they using non-testimonial evidence? Did you invoke your Confrontation Clause right to cross-examine witnesses? Good point though, you probably can insist on examining the officer.

I've never heard the cops even use the radar. They'll pull you over, tell you they had you on radar, but the actual report has some other bs on it, pacing, guesstimate, etc

what files did you have that many?

Just old news papers. It needed to be heavy.

Whaaat!?!?

What is going on here????

That last line 😂😂

So what happens exactly when the cop doesn’t show up? Is it automatically thrown out?

I have 6 in 6 years 😭

Yes but if you fight it and get it dismissed the next time you get pulled over it won’t show up on your record. Even if you go to traffic school you were still found guilty in a court of law and will ultimately pay more on insurance in the long run.

That makes no sense. We don't have to pay anything if we win in the UK.

No where I practice (Florida), you won't. "No defendant in a criminal prosecution who is acquitted or discharged shall be liable for any costs or fees of the court or any ministerial office, or for any charge of subsistence while detained in custody." Fla. Stat. 939.06 I'm willing to bet your state is the same and you are simply mistaken. The idea that you have to pay court costs if you win is a myth that cops and prosecutors spread in order to discourage people from going to trial. They WANT you to think you're screwed either way, that way you're more likely to negotiate with them for, say, a lower fine. If they can convince you that going to court is going to cost you hours and hours of your time PLUS $60 in court costs, then that $120 fine (down from $200) they are offering seems pretty reasonable. It's not. You won't actually be in the courtroom for as long as they say, and you won't have to pay any court costs if you win.

@@scamcorrect, same in the US if you win

@@sc1338 Depends on the jurisdiction.

@@sc1338 not true. You still pay the court fees in most jurisdictions. In Indiana, a deferment for a speeding ticket is around $60-$80 whereas the court fee is $60 per court apearence. Meaning that to even fight the ticket you incure $180 in court fees (plea hearing, case hearing, and judgment) which you will pay regardless of weather or not the ticket is dismissed in court. Trust me, if it's your first ticket (or the first in 5+ years) it's not worth it to fight, just take the 2 points and pay the deferment.

Ikr 😂

Older peeps cant hear the high pitch

Is this the first time you've heard a whistle? They're supposed to be high pitched

I think if the cop wasn't using a radar gun it doesn't count since the evudence wasn't sure

​@rescur385 nope. All police officers in the United States are certified to judge a vehicles speed based on their vision alone. They use radar guns for convenience, not because it is more accurate or a requirement. Source: various cops who have blogs that I follow.

@@RogerLackmanstupidest shit I’ve heard, hopefully it only applies to ~30 over the limit because otherwise that sounds dumb

Get a dashcam with speed monitoring

Hey there! I genuinely share your concerns about relying on visual estimation as a method for determining speed. It's subjective and can be open to interpretation. However, when you apply math to the situation, it can provide a clearer picture. For instance, if an officer claims to have observed a driver going 87 MPH and observed the driver for a few seconds and estimates the driver's distance traveled during that time, you can use the formula for speed, which is the distance over time. Let's say the officer observed for 3 seconds and estimated the driver traveled 250 feet. That translates to 83.3 feet per second. When you convert that to miles per hour, it's only 56.82 mph. This kind of questioning can be crucial, especially if you don't have a dashcam. The article I found at [www.lawfirms.com/resources/criminal-defense/traffic-tickets/cross-examine-officer-speeding-ticket.htm ) delves deeper into this technique. While I'm not an attorney, for those representing themselves, understanding and applying this math could be a valuable tool in court. Always consult with a legal professional if you're in such a situation.

Don’t commit hit and runs on police vehicles, maybe.

Plead the 5th, don't talk without a lawyer, pray. The best outcome would've been to not run because police vehicles have cameras

Don’t narc on them on the internet lmfao

​@@TheOddLiaDon't get caught doing hit and runs on police vehicles*

fight till your last breath ,that's all I can say

the city crew here have a really bad habit of putting speed limit signs in prohibited areas and at prohibited heights or behind trees, all of them are unlawful, I actually measured a speed sign at 2.5 feet, in tis state it has to be 5ft or higher measured from the bottom of the sign to the road line. If the sign is not at a required height it's not legal and the legal default is the nearest sign at a proper height. I argued this in court once and it was changed the same day because the feds will stop city funding for illegal traffic signs that result in a fine to the citizen.

Not a lawyer for a reason. 🤣 Awful advice.

Lol I believe you. I got a ticket in a small city outside of Houston county and the lawyer told me they do things different here than in big cities. Basically you pay the city to get things dismissed. I plead guilty to something other than my ticket and pay the fine and if I don’t get any tickets in a month my original ticket gets dismissed. Which is great if you have a driving job and need your license clean.

@@TheTruelakersfan Deferred adjudication…

@@badkarma6181 that’s not what he called it. Basically I pled guilty to not showing to court a misdemeanor and I paid the fees on that and not running a red light which I wasn’t guilty of anyway. But I paid and pled guilty because it made it easier to win and no record on my license. Because In Texas there’s is no reducing sentences for commercial drivers they’re very strict! Lawyer said plead guilty to failure to appear in court,pay the fine for that and somehow I’m free lol. Dirty tactics of you ask me. But hey it helped me out.

@@TheTruelakersfan I’m a Texan as well (Smith county) !! So it was just about the m😉ney, only about the m😉ney, and always about the m😉ney ?

Legal shield $25-$30 a month.

@@jacksycz Legitimate question... is it actually good though, because that's a remarkably low price. The last thing I'd want in a crisis is a doordash for lawyers

This isn't "decent legal advice," it's dirty tactics.

Yeah people that have done all their research on RU-vid usually know what they’re talking about 😂

@@davidparent4808 What's dirty about hoping the cop doesn't show up or proving the radar wasn't calibrated? I wouldn't do the radar without a good attorney, but traffic tickets otherwise are fairly easy offenses to get dismissed in relative terms.

So...............NO constitution!? Got it! Next?

🤣 two years and 3 missed days of work. You really showed them! HAHA

FTP!

When I was in court, a cop admitted that he lost his notes and couldn't recall the stop from 3 years earlier so the judge dismissed it. It was the only other case that the defendant prevailed other than mine of course.

are y'alls attention spans really that low? You can't sit through 4 minutes?

what the fuck do you mean for those who don't want to watch the vid? I certainly ain't no reading allat tho 🤣🤣🤦

​@@uglen7420I can do 4 mins however , 4mins and 41secs is a bit much.

@@uglen7420Ong 😭

​@@uglen7420With an attention span like that it'd be hard to show up to court

I thought i recall a truck driver stating they would prefer a ticket in some cases because you can fight it/get it dismissed. Do written warnings affect your CDL record? Im thinking of getting my CDL.

@@connor3288 Yes, written warnings can and likely WILL affect your record & CSA score. Tickets/citations can be fought by yourself or by an attorney on your behalf. Written warnings are nearly impossible to fight

@@_bobjohnson1157 Ahh that makes sense. So would you rather get a ticket yourself? Or try to explain all factors to officer?

Ummmm..newsflash, they dont need to write crap down! Youre dumasss is on bodycam/dashcam, and they will review this before court!

I don’t know where you live but most cops start their shifts at 7-8am. And courts generally don’t open until 8-9am. More than likely a cop is already up at 4:30 regardless of the court appearance. Don’t see that one working in many cases

Courts don't open until 8am. You have to work around the courts schedule. They don't work around yours or before the sun comes up

No it's not because it screw you In the long run, it's on your record with give you points towards your driver license and increases your car insurance.

Theoretically you could sue to recover those costs lol (please note the fact that I said “theoretically”)

Imagine paying for anything. Where I live I can get lawyers to do it all for free whether they win or lose.

@@NaudVanDalen anyone can get a public defender lol

@@hihihihi3806 Then why are they saying it's expensive? Like who's hiring a private lawyer for a traffic ticket?

Never talk to cops. If you bring that up at the side of the road they might just calibrate it right away, and in any case it'll clue them into the fact that you know your stuff so they'll put more effort into preparing for trial.

A cop will likely just look for more circumstantial evidence or false charges. It isn't illegal if they lie to you or on official records, only on the stand... If they think you aren't just going to pay your ticket, they will take better notes to fight you in court. Best to be polite as possible, and don't give them anything more than what they ask for. (Refuse any search. Ask for clarification and proof of any suspicions they might have.)

no!

What part of shut the fuck up do you not get? Say nothing to the cop. Nothing more than the bare minimum

Calibration is checked by technicians. What officers do is check the radar for accuracy. All you do is press a self check button on the radar. It's supposed to produce a certain result to show that the unit is working. Then you use the tuning forks on all o the antennas. If it isn't accurate, you take it outbid service. We had a block on our daily logs where we did that at the beginning and end of every shift. Some guys would log in with Dispatch too. It was a standard part if the day. In Georgia, we were also required to inform drivers of their right to have us check the radar prior to issuing a citation. Georgia is the only place that I have seen with such extensive anti-speed trap laws.

I hope u won that case

So what did you do exactly? Did you just request these things before the judge? And plead not guilty?

What is the Ada? How in advance to your court hearing you have to request this meeting?

Took it to trial at 2 states and neither had a prosecutor. The cop basically serves as one.