I feel one of the biggest problem a delegate faces(specially a newbie) is that they don't know what a conference, the agenda or the EB demand. It's difficult for a newbie to understand to understand the agenda and how the EB makes its impression over him or her. I would actually like, if you make one video with a POV as an EB, telling how one EB analyses the conference and delegates; what does the EB expect from the delegates; what mistakes are made; how the EB evaluates the position of a delegation in the committee and also share your experience as an EB from the last mun you attended. :)
Is there any particular format to refuse to any request of the other delegates(like when they're manipulating or maybe convincing us to join them or something but we don't want to) or we can simply say no? great series btw!!!
The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in conflict zones like the Israel-Palestine region could have profound and far-reaching impacts on both the immediate conflict and regional security and lead to several potential consequences like Escalation of Violence: The introduction of WMDs, such as nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons, could dramatically escalate the intensity of the conflict. The mere threat of these weapons might lead to more aggressive strategies, as parties seek to either preempt or counter the perceived threat. Humanitarian Catastrophe: The use of WMDs would likely result in massive civilian casualties and suffering. The immediate impact on populations could be catastrophic, and the long-term health effects of chemical or biological weapons would strain medical systems and cause enduring harm. Regional Destabilization: The proliferation of WMDs could destabilize the broader region, heightening tensions between neighboring states and potentially drawing them into the conflict. Nations may feel compelled to increase their own military capabilities or seek alliances, leading to an arms race and further instability. International Reactions: The international community may respond with increased sanctions, military interventions, or diplomatic efforts to contain the conflict. This could lead to greater international involvement and possibly exacerbate tensions between global powers with vested interests in the region. Undermining Peace Efforts: The threat or use of WMDs could derail ongoing peace processes and negotiations. The presence of such weapons would create a climate of fear and mistrust, making it more difficult for parties to engage in meaningful dialogue and compromise. Economic Impact: The regional economy could suffer due to the direct effects of conflict and the indirect effects of sanctions, disrupted trade, and increased security measures. The economic strain could exacerbate existing social and political issues within the region. Environmental Damage: The use of chemical or biological weapons could lead to severe environmental damage, affecting air, water, and soil quality. This damage could have long-lasting effects on agriculture, water supplies, and overall ecosystem health. International Norms and Non-Proliferation Efforts: The spread of WMDs in a high-profile conflict could undermine global non-proliferation norms and treaties. It might encourage other states or non-state actors to pursue similar weapons, challenging international efforts to curb the spread of these dangerous technologies. In summary, the proliferation of WMDs in the Israel-Palestine conflict would likely have devastating effects on human life, regional stability, international relations, and global non-proliferation efforts, making it imperative for the international community to address these risks with urgency and coordinated action.
These days specially in school MUNs in the Bangalore circuit we come across several delegates who just make their bloc as the. believe they will get the 5 or 10 point in authorship irrespective of foreign policy.......Even in my last MUN I came across such delegates but was able to supress them and won best delegate
Hello bhaiya, as an experienced delegate who has done 6 muns , I wanted to get some help on my lobbying skills and my inability to answer questions in the conference .You may be thinking why do i need help if I am experienced, but the reality is that i get hit with anxiety whenever I’m giving a speech , answering a poi and lobbying. Due to this my research looks like it’s not up to the mark which just makes me lose in conferences, the main problem is that I’m unable to attract the attention of the delegates present in the conference while lobbying do you have any solution for this?
