Тёмный

How to Measure FLATNESS Perfectly with Jack Stands 

TITANS of CNC MACHINING
Подписаться 899 тыс.
Просмотров 105 тыс.
50% 1

Mitutoyo - Travis teaches you how to inspect flatness using 40 year old jack stands.
Purchase Mitutoyo inspection equipment from our store: store.titansofcnc.com/collect...
Help us fund FREE Education by purchasing tools seen in our videos here:
TITANSofCNCTooling.com
FREE CNC Machining Academy:
rebrand.ly/TiAcademy
FREE Aerospace Academy:
rebrand.ly/TiAero
Subscribe for daily content and expert knowledge: rebrand.ly/SUBTITANS
___
___
FREE CNC Machining Academy. Join the Revolution:
rebrand.ly/TiAcademy
Follow us on Instagram:
rebrand.ly/TiINSTA
Like us on Facebook:
rebrand.ly/TiFACEBOOK
Join the conversation on our Facebook Group:
rebrand.ly/TiFBGroup
Connect with us on LinkedIn:
rebrand.ly/TiLINKEDIN
___
___
THANK YOU to our Partners who make this content possible:
Kennametal - rebrand.ly/TiKennametal
Doosan - bit.ly/DoosanTiYT
United Grinding - rebrand.ly/TiGrinding
Mastercam - rebrand.ly/MastercamEDUTiYT
Blaser Swisslube - rebrand.ly/TiBlaser
Tormach - rebrand.ly/TiTormach
Solidworks - rebrand.ly/TiSLDWRKS20
Trumpf - rebrand.ly/TiTRUMPF2022
Trumpf TruMark - rebrand.ly/TiTRUMPFTruMark
Trumpf TruPrint - rebrand.ly/TiTruPrint
Markforged - rebrand.ly/TITAN-Markforged
Tyrolit - rebrand.ly/TITAN-Tyrolit
Mitutoyo - rebrand.ly/TiMitutoyo
Haimer - rebrand.ly/TiHAIMER
LNS - rebrand.ly/TITAN-LNS
FANUC America - rebrand.ly/TiFanuc
Schunk - rebrand.ly/TiSchunk
ONA - www.ellisontechnologies.com/t...
#CNC #Machining #Machinist

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

28 фев 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 339   
@Javelina_Poppers
@Javelina_Poppers 2 года назад
Manual inspection is almost becoming a lost art with the rise of CMM equipment available to the shop floor. The aerospace company I worked for had Maxichecks, Zeiss and a monster L&K CMM in our layout inspection area. We also had an old guy named Bud who could inspect a part with a height stand and indicator, a tilt rotary table and a calculator faster than a CMM could. We compared his readings with the CMM and he was spot on every time. The man was an artist at his craft.
@ZacharyTelesca
@ZacharyTelesca 2 года назад
I have never had either art. One nice 6” starrett dial caliper and I can build you a jet engine 🤣
@j.j.s.jr.5136
@j.j.s.jr.5136 2 года назад
Sounds like me. Lol not trying to be cocky but I am faster with everyone that uses the cmm vs me using Cadillac, a height stand and indicator.
@dominic6634
@dominic6634 2 года назад
@@ZacharyTelesca hmm must be really nice calipers.
@ZacharyTelesca
@ZacharyTelesca 2 года назад
@@dominic6634 make sure they are zeroed, measure 10 times, remove the outliers and average the rest 🤣
@jeremyl.7563
@jeremyl.7563 2 года назад
I agree. My company just invested in ViciVision M306 Techno. I'm not going to lie, though; it's pretty bad a**.
@trevorgoforth8963
@trevorgoforth8963 2 года назад
Travis is the best quality guy I have worked with, especially considering he's an incredible Machinist as well, you don't find that very often. Great video man!
@brahtrumpwonbigly7309
@brahtrumpwonbigly7309 2 года назад
Excellent video. We need more QC content on here. It is especially important for the machine operators making parts to know how a part is to be checked for various requirements. This only benefits everyone.
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
Ha ha. You get no argument from me. Thanks for watching.
@highpointsights
@highpointsights 2 года назад
like your handle (Trumpwon,bigly)
@codypenick6098
@codypenick6098 2 года назад
The quickest way to do this is to have the surface you want to check facing the granite. Set it on 3 blocks the same size( Gauge blocks are fine). Then run an indicator on the bottom side. This eliminates the need to indicate in flat.
@JamesKC3OXN
@JamesKC3OXN 2 года назад
This is probably the quickest and most accurate way for larger faces, like the one he just showed. His technique has much more uncertainty. I use 3ea. 1-2-3 blocks that are lapped and matched with an indicator on a base that slides under the part, no adjustments needed.
@360mac360
@360mac360 2 года назад
While I often did that in gauging gauge plates I made, this way does allow access to the entire surface. Indicating the bottom does not. I would normally check three points on the bottom so I could measure the parallelism of the part, but as this was already known and he just wanted to check flatness, this was best as it gave easy access to the whole surface.
@dj2740
@dj2740 2 года назад
feeler gauges and granitew block done and it will give true flatness not perpendicularity like indicator will.
@billymann5325
@billymann5325 2 года назад
Exactly!...I def have no use (future reference) for this video!
@jonathanbatson6541
@jonathanbatson6541 2 года назад
@@dj2740The risk with doing that is that if they're part is a cup shape where you would miss a low spot in the center because the edges are touching the granite not allowing the feeler gauge to see the high spot A common alternative is a flat plate with a plunger indicator poking up the center and you can move the part over it. Indirectly measure the deviation from the surface of the flat plate to the lowest part of the feature which will give you the flatness. I'm going to call the flatness indicator
@Jatsekusama
@Jatsekusama 2 года назад
More videos like that!!! Pure educational gold!!! :D
@merouanebenderradji1582
@merouanebenderradji1582 2 года назад
Man why can't I like this video twice, an amazingly valuable information please Travis everyone does machining videos on youtube but no one does inspection, please more inspection videos especially old school inspection methods.
@stamrly418
@stamrly418 2 года назад
One is a point…two is a line.. three are a plane. Simple and effective…. Most machinist will have this inbred but for the rest of us who watch to be educated and amazed its always good to have things to latch onto for our hobbies and work. You must be a super high performing genius not to learn something from these videos….. consistent learning..magic.
@highpointsights
@highpointsights 2 года назад
Yeah I get that their flatness wasn't at all a tight call out but I'm surprised that you guys tried that?
@f.t.w8645
@f.t.w8645 2 года назад
Thanks man, you're a good teacher with clear explanation Travis.
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
My pleasure. Thanks for watching.
@metalextras
@metalextras 2 года назад
This is a good content, back to basic to things that most people forgot or simply cheaper methods that can be done immediately, especially for a machinist....
@user-qs2iq1ci8m
@user-qs2iq1ci8m Год назад
Thanks as a mechanic support machinist we don't always get the best of inspection equipment (cmms) this can help alot of people Keep up the tips!
@Godofhouse
@Godofhouse 2 года назад
Keep on giving!!! Watching before work starts
@tdg911
@tdg911 2 года назад
That is badass. Love the way you clearly explain things. Very easy to follow your teachings. Much love and gratitude
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
Thank you my friend.
@riotgames1
@riotgames1 Год назад
As an inspector in aerospace, I would agree with everything said in this video. That's how you do it :)
@murn20091
@murn20091 2 года назад
Reminds me of when I worked. I was In aerospace/medical. I spent 35 + yrs as machinist, T&D maker and in metrology.
@tj9382
@tj9382 Год назад
Please do more of these. Excellent demonstration.
@AnunnakiAaron
@AnunnakiAaron 2 года назад
Appreciate the QC & Inspection videos. Please do more of these. Thanks a lot!
@user-qh7rr1pf3j
@user-qh7rr1pf3j 2 года назад
Very good work... This knowledge will help many...
@ls2005019227
@ls2005019227 2 года назад
Excellent content! Everything that I have is manual....but these principles still apply. Great explanation. Thanks!
@murn20091
@murn20091 2 года назад
Really enjoying you videos.
@artmckay6704
@artmckay6704 2 года назад
Very good tip! This is extremely useful! Thank you! :)
@chopperjohn1046
@chopperjohn1046 2 года назад
He does such an excellent job in explaining the Procedure !!
@tonydique4554
@tonydique4554 2 года назад
Very cool. Thank you
@andrewdiehl5746
@andrewdiehl5746 2 года назад
Be careful using sharpies on Stainless steels, they can lead to long term corrosion. Lots of applications forbid anything other than low chloride/low halogen marking implements on a finished surface.
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
That is true Andrew. Thank you for adding that.
@kw2519
@kw2519 2 года назад
Ya, that made me anxious 😂
@AnunnakiAaron
@AnunnakiAaron 2 года назад
hmmm didn't know that. Thanks.
@dominic6634
@dominic6634 Год назад
You not wrong but its situational
@dominic6634
@dominic6634 Год назад
You not wrong but its situational
@VuMinhTuan350
@VuMinhTuan350 Месяц назад
very useful, thanks team
@Michaelsloncehammr
@Michaelsloncehammr 2 года назад
Love the video 💕
@jgom4674
@jgom4674 2 года назад
Amazing! Thank you Travis. Will you be doing more old school gd&t measurements.
@eddrm4685
@eddrm4685 2 года назад
Great video!
@user-fj3vs6sr3x
@user-fj3vs6sr3x 10 месяцев назад
Excellent video thank you!
@360mac360
@360mac360 2 года назад
Very nicely done, great job explaining things. Thank you.
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
Thanks Jeff! I appreciate that my friend.
@RedDogForge
@RedDogForge 8 месяцев назад
Thanks! It amazed me to watch u fellas doing a tool.setup a while back. Yall started with joblocks and the surface plate as your root reference. Johanson was smiling down from heaven ;)
@nitrocat
@nitrocat 2 года назад
I like this method. I usually set up the surface to be inspected upside down on three points and sweep under with a long stem indicator.
@ILmachiner
@ILmachiner 2 года назад
Don't change you are checking flatness correctly. This video is checking parallel.
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
@@ILmachiner you can check it both ways accurately so long as you create a perfect plane to measure against on the top surface. This is why we use the adjustable jacks. In a technical sense we are checking against the uncertainty of the surface plate but that is true no matter how you do it.
@ILmachiner
@ILmachiner 2 года назад
@@travisjarrett2355 this method is a wast of time. Put the part on 3 points you know are equal hight. That is the plain. The smaller the point on the 3 points the better, or use precision balls.
@nitrocat
@nitrocat 2 года назад
@@travisjarrett2355 I see the advantage of having the surface facing up where you have full access. It's an extra step but not much work. Setting up is half the fun.
@wallyonfashion
@wallyonfashion 2 года назад
great video more metrology videos needed to our comunity great job
@ParsaTheCube
@ParsaTheCube 15 дней назад
Super helpful!
@dafacocortes4329
@dafacocortes4329 2 года назад
Awesome man
@khanahmad452
@khanahmad452 2 года назад
Thanks for sharing
@rodneycarpenter3253
@rodneycarpenter3253 2 года назад
Thanks great explanation.
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
Thanks Rodney.
@nicholasbriozzo6249
@nicholasbriozzo6249 2 года назад
Love it!
@DolezalPetr
@DolezalPetr 2 года назад
this is exactly how I would do it, great demonstration
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
Thank you very much.
@Rabb865
@Rabb865 2 года назад
Thanks 🙏 great video
@Zakariae92
@Zakariae92 5 месяцев назад
Great explanation espacially when adding the comparison of CMM
@nathanthomas8184
@nathanthomas8184 2 года назад
Flawless demonstration on how accurate Old Skool in your Kit Bag of TRUTHS Travis. Your average goes without saying Ya Turning Skills kick the Foot Pedal of Knowledge, Titan keep on B💥💥MING on
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
Ha ha! Thanks Nathan.
@bocampo2934
@bocampo2934 2 года назад
Just because these boys have everything, doesn't mean they forgot everything that got them there. Always good to rely on accurate, proven conventional methods to check the accuracy of your parts. Great Video Travis!!
@ELECTRICMOTOCROSSMACHINE
@ELECTRICMOTOCROSSMACHINE 2 года назад
Very cool.
@WarpFactor999
@WarpFactor999 2 года назад
Excellent video! Simple, clear, concise. Well done. Could have mentioned temperature stabilization for such a heavy part. That could take a full day if you want to get down to tenths. Also you could mention on thinner/lighter parts the need to wear gloves to keep body heat out of the part.
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
All good points my friend. There are so many subtle changes that can take place when dealing with thousands (or ten thousandths) of an inch. Thanks for watching.
@WarpFactor999
@WarpFactor999 2 года назад
@@travisjarrett2355 Exactly so. Just been bitten by heat from handling making scrap parts a few too many times. 😀😀😀
@darrenHokage4842
@darrenHokage4842 2 года назад
If the face your inspecting has more of a cupped or dish shape, would you then have too indicate from the tallest points of the piece? And would you also have to indicate the "roundness" of that sort of shape?
@thedepartedone
@thedepartedone 2 года назад
I am sill learning, but a few questions come to mind: 1. Aren't you measuring parallelism when you set your reference on the bottom and then measure off the top? Taller stands would let you sweep the underside where your plane is established. 2. Adjustable jack stands seem unreliable for precision work with call outs in the .005 range, just setting the part on them could cause more movement then that on the threads, adjustments aside wouldn't fixed stands that have been run through the surface grinder together be more accurate as a base? You guys are awesome and I like how everything is broken into manageable sections for the widest audience, this is a trade that will always have a place in the world and it's great to see enthusiastic teachers of useful skills.
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
I do not use the bottom for the reference plane but rather use the adjustable jack stands to create the reference plane on the top surface. Takes a little longer but give better access in my opinion.
@blacklabel6223
@blacklabel6223 2 года назад
You are creating a parallel measurement, but you’re doing is by referencing your plane to a known flat plane. So you assume the table is “dead flat” and then the peaks and valleys of the top surface can be referenced to a perfect plane. So yes, but only as a byproduct. The real goal is referencing the measured plane to a “perfect” one. Weirdly enough the jack stands work okay. For super precise stuff they do make high precision jack stands and such. Great questions man
@trentwood1449
@trentwood1449 Год назад
I agree with the previous two replies. If you plan to use the jacks in the fashion when you are sweeping your indicator on the face of the part that the jacks are resting on you must use a point style tip (on the jack). Using the ball mount socket creates a pivot point mini datum pad. This style of feature could cause unintentional interactions with the part if cupped and would not act as reference points. The whole idea is three points make a plane.
@nf794
@nf794 2 года назад
Would have been interesting to know what flatness the cmm gave yall but anyway nice and easy way to check parts!
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
I took 3 circles with the CMM. Inner, middle, and outer on the face. CMM came back at .0031 Thanks for watching.
@JohnSmith-pn2vl
@JohnSmith-pn2vl 11 месяцев назад
excellent
@jaimecruz7275
@jaimecruz7275 2 года назад
seen it done it, show us more complicated QC practices. This is TITAN!!
@oldschoolmobile
@oldschoolmobile 2 года назад
I would have thought it better to check the 3 points on the bottom plane and then vs the top plane, that would establish flatness and parallelism. Because I would think they are very relative to one another, especially with that part being part of a hub of some sort. Correct me if I'm wrong. 🤷‍♂️
@blacklabel6223
@blacklabel6223 2 года назад
He’s only measuring flatness, the parallelism isn’t relevant. If it was parallel he could just set it on the table as one plane and then measure the top, no need for stands. You would still have to check flatness and parallelism separately though. They may call out a 0.001” flatness with a 0.005” parallelism for example, where you could easily meet parallel but not flat. That’s where this comes in
@oldschoolmobile
@oldschoolmobile 2 года назад
@@blacklabel6223 yes I understand your point here, but my thinking is, if you have the part raised to level it out, you could then check both, flatness and parallelism with that same setup vs doing 2 as you mentioned. Kinda kill 2 birds, one stone type of thing. Or, while you're there, unless the part has an angled face. But I get ya. 👍
@MattJonesGR9
@MattJonesGR9 2 года назад
We have some Renishaw Equator CMMs at work. They take longer to inspect the part machined then it does to actually machine it. Pretty crap when the cnc machine producing them needs to run constantly to hold size..
@EZ_shop
@EZ_shop 2 года назад
Thanks Travis for another great video. One thing I don't understand is the reason for the three jacks. Is it because we cannot assume the bottom surface of the part to be flat? Ciao, Marco.
@wickem8276
@wickem8276 2 года назад
yes that is part of it, the bottom isn't a perfect surface and has it's own tolerences that could add or cancel with the top surface (kinda like a trapazoid vs parallelogram). Using the jacks isolates the top surface.
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
Thanks Marco. As wictor kempel mentioned that is partly correct. We need to isolate the surface we are checking from any imperfections on the bottom surface (not flat) or maybe more importantly any relations between the two surfaces (not parallel). The jack stands allow us to isolate the surface from these possible imperfections that would distort the readings. Thanks for watching Marco.
@EZ_shop
@EZ_shop 2 года назад
@@travisjarrett2355 Thanks for the explanation Travis (and Wictor). You do a great job on your videos, I enjoy watching them a lot.
@williamofhler5613
@williamofhler5613 2 года назад
I've seen the indicator point angled almost straight down to the part. Way back learned to keep at least the point as parallel to the part as possible. Seems to be so different with newer machinist
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
This is indeed correct William and maybe I should have mentioned it. I did try to make the angle as small as possible and still access the whole surface of the part. Compensating for the roughly 20 degree angle (estimated) would put the actual deviation around .0031 (a difference of .0002). For this particular application I was ok with this level of uncertainty. Thanks for watching.
@cjxtheninja8
@cjxtheninja8 2 года назад
So satisfying to watch as a machinist lol
@Stasiek_Zabojca
@Stasiek_Zabojca 2 года назад
Cool! Now we wait for next level, how to chech parallelism :) I have never seen how it's done.
@oulinsaeteurn9078
@oulinsaeteurn9078 Год назад
99% of the time. Use a mic
@z.5782
@z.5782 2 года назад
I love metrology 💖
@jcmanny101
@jcmanny101 2 года назад
Some old dude I use to work with would do both CMM and this way just to make sure to bad he never really like sharing the knowledge. Unlike myself I enjoy teaching those who are interested.
@Eme_Lopez
@Eme_Lopez Год назад
Do you have any GD&T explanation video?
@gregoryhamblett9071
@gregoryhamblett9071 2 года назад
Am nearing retirement.. the reason I mention is! I have been watching these videos for some weeks now.. I've had a good working career, but it's never felt like I really was in the right profession. Anyway I think I should have become a machining engineer 🤔 I have really enjoyed the provisional side of this videos..
@NS-no1li
@NS-no1li Год назад
The way you are doing this we’re you are looking for parallel and surface planter accuracy.. you are relying on your step ups as perfectly level after adjustments you have done. What you should do is either set your surface parallel with a know parallel surface gauge, or do as you have done but take your measurements three times by moving the part in rotation 120 degrees and recheck your intended surface. This is the only two ways you can accurately measure parallel surface for planier accuracy. One you have determined planier accuracy is parallel, then you can check your intended surface accuracy, however.. this is also determined by the bottom surface be planier accurate as well. By rotation 120 degrees you can immediately determine your bottom surface accuracy. Mil Spec T5400 quality assurance standard.
@felipechavez3517
@felipechavez3517 2 года назад
I would love to see you do projection, symmetry, and true position without CMM.
@hrritapani
@hrritapani 2 года назад
Symmetry can be inspected quite easily, rest of those in the otherhand will take some fiddling to do.
@highpointsights
@highpointsights 2 года назад
I really enjoyed doing true up position!! THE OLD FASHIONED WAY. AND I ALWAYS GO WITH GAGES OVER CMM
@joelawton123
@joelawton123 2 года назад
Nice demo. It would have been good to see the cmm output to compare. I can’t help watching anything like this in imperial units without thinking how much easier this stuff is in metric though 😂
@thelonewolf8023
@thelonewolf8023 2 года назад
Yeah, I know the struggle 🤣
@rensplasmeijer407
@rensplasmeijer407 2 года назад
Was this in mm or inches? I'm a R&D worker and if that's inches I think that's a lot of runout to have. I'm used to work within 0.003 mm
@hamzanawaz7945
@hamzanawaz7945 2 года назад
Great.
@kylefletcher7666
@kylefletcher7666 2 года назад
Looks like it would indeed show you flatness but would not tell you perpendicularness from that face and the face against the jacks correct ? Kyle F. Lead Machinist from Tulsa ok thanks
@noureddinebensaoua8444
@noureddinebensaoua8444 12 дней назад
Hello sir, could you provide more videos about other geometric tolerances ?
@tingveson
@tingveson 2 года назад
Measure flatness with an optical flat or auto collimator. I made several up to 12"(305mm) diameter in that size flatness, was 1/20 of wave length, monochrome green.
@naiyernizamalam5060
@naiyernizamalam5060 Год назад
Dear sir, what should be tripod position angle ??
@VenturiLife
@VenturiLife 2 года назад
This guy seems to be on the level.
@patmchugh1327
@patmchugh1327 2 года назад
We have a leveling plates various sizes alot safer than using jacks. They are about 1/4 inch steel plates drilled and threaded holes with bolts with rounded ends that sit on the table. I think they date from the 1960's
@mikeblankenship7930
@mikeblankenship7930 2 года назад
I have 6 of those same jacks
@jamescerven4400
@jamescerven4400 2 года назад
Super cool technique! Thanks for sharing! I have a question though. Why does the bottom not get measured? Because couldn't there be high and low spots on there too? That the jacks might not be on.
@skid00etec
@skid00etec 2 года назад
Flatness is only a surface relative to itself. The surface on the bottom in this case is irrelevant.
@jamescerven4400
@jamescerven4400 2 года назад
@@skid00etec oh really? I thought it was one face compared to the other face. Or is that parallelism?
@skid00etec
@skid00etec 2 года назад
@@jamescerven4400 yes, that's parallelism.
@jamescerven4400
@jamescerven4400 2 года назад
@@skid00etec thanks! And will each side of the part have a flatness tolerance or only one side?
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
Hey James, looks like Michael got you right. Thanks Michael. As to flatness on both surfaces it just depends. More often than not I see flatness on one side and parallelism on the other (called out in relation to the surface with the flatness), but if both surfaces were say sealing surfaces you would likely see a flatness callout on both. Thanks for watching James.
@czh2432
@czh2432 2 года назад
Great video, but you could of just used three 1-2-3 blocks (or 3 gage blocks) to do a rough check like that. Just a suggestion.
@DJxUNiT
@DJxUNiT 2 года назад
The problem I have with this method of checking flatness is that if one of the 3 points you set the initial plane is low (if the flatness happened to be way out in that one spot), then your whole plane is now bad and you don’t know about it. When I manually check flatness, I set the part on three points on the surface I’m checking flatness on, then sweep my indicator under the part. The points that it sits on give more surface area, compared to the indicator ball which is has an infinitely small contact point given its spherical shape, for the part to locate on. In this instance it wasn’t an issue due to the part being dished and the flatness essentially got worse as you got farther from the center in every direction, but it could be an issue on other parts. All this being said depending on your tolerance this method is probably always fine. Might be worth mentioning the reason for using 3 points and not 4 too. Just thoughts. Source: my name
@AnunnakiAaron
@AnunnakiAaron 2 года назад
That's part of the reason why you're checking the rest of the surface though right, as if you choose one point, and move, and its off as soon as you move away, you immediately know that point is off. If it stays the same, as you move away, and is the same as the surrounding points, you don't have a point that's out.
@rogerbrandt6678
@rogerbrandt6678 2 года назад
How do I contact Titan, I have a idea that can revolutionize the auto industry.
@davidm.7220
@davidm.7220 2 года назад
Make a video on how to check parallelism with the indicator. Thanks
@lucasciarini5873
@lucasciarini5873 2 года назад
it's pretty much the same but for parallelism you lean the part directly on the table
@davidm.7220
@davidm.7220 2 года назад
So the only difference is the three points? I always thought you would indicate the bottom surface for flatnesses and the top for parallelism. Thanks!
@gooblio
@gooblio 2 года назад
5 thou flatness, I wish. I could check that with a flat edge. I can see that with my eye. 😂
@GrandePunto8V
@GrandePunto8V 8 месяцев назад
"Isolating a plane" is the name of the technique.
@chrmeiss67
@chrmeiss67 Год назад
How do you calculate the Measurement errors? I am afraid there are many of them.
@HighGear7445
@HighGear7445 2 года назад
Yup that's how we did it before CMM became more common. About the only thing I would ad in the video is cleaning the table and working surfaces before you start. I know you checked it but for any newbys it would be good to show it.
@travisjarrett2355
@travisjarrett2355 2 года назад
Indeed my friend. Thanks for watching.
@danapatelzick594
@danapatelzick594 5 месяцев назад
The other way to measure flatness is to have 3 gauge blocks. Flip the part over with the surface needing verification supported with the guage blocks. Sweep the surface with a dial test indicator. Flatness is the difference between min and max indicator reading. This works fairly well.
@the_irav
@the_irav Год назад
"One is a point, two are a line, three are a plane." These are my thoughts about everything. It's been years that I want to write things down. 😅 Things only become real with a 3-point framework. And it's just everywhere.
@Malledeus86
@Malledeus86 2 года назад
I see you used a sharpie on your part. Honorable mention if you are making parts for Boeing big no no. We had a major finding where I used to work because we’d write with sharpie marker “MRR” (Material review request) for non conformance parts, but every now and then the parts would be looked over by engineering and deemed conforming. With the sharpie though I guess it can do something to the metal later on down the line which etches it or something. So Boeing actually makes sharpie markers that are to be used with their parts to meet their spec which we found out during an audit. Just thought I’d mention maybe you guys are more familiar with it than I am. I forget the full reason or the actual spec it was under it was years ago now.
@andrewdiehl5746
@andrewdiehl5746 2 года назад
Halogens in the sharpie can degrade the oxide layer on stainless and lead to corrosion. Lots of people make special markers.
@davidsanders6957
@davidsanders6957 10 месяцев назад
Pretty level guy !!😅😅😅
@DrDime_
@DrDime_ 2 года назад
As long as your table has zero variation, this is great! I would have my doubts about a table being perfectly flat in such a large area, but I'm sure you guys are very aware of the tables flatness and levelness. As usual, great job!
@blacklabel6223
@blacklabel6223 2 года назад
It’s a surface plate, they’re ground dead flat and also have a report to say how flat it really is. Usually sub tenth accuracy
@DrDime_
@DrDime_ 2 года назад
@@blacklabel6223 👍
@chrisyates8115
@chrisyates8115 2 года назад
My concern as well!!
@scottyh72
@scottyh72 2 года назад
@@blacklabel6223 No where in this video was this mentioned. It is more important than the whole video, as if the granite is not flat, neither is the part.
@gordonburnett9672
@gordonburnett9672 2 года назад
You can check your granite with the indicator prior to use. If it reads zero everywhere you are probably OK, just need to have base in multiple directions for a grid, really only necessary for weekly check if you are using it often and maybe wearing it while sliding the base around, or if it's new to you. Next video on how to fix this issue on the machine please 😁, so that we can get a perfect part off.
@tonyking9235
@tonyking9235 2 года назад
JUST A FRINDLEY BIT OF ADVICE . NEVER PUT SOME THING DOWN ONTO THE GRANITE . THE BEST WAY IS TO SLIDE IT ON AND SLIDE IT OF . NICE WORK . ⚘⚘⚘⚘
@whtkngofc
@whtkngofc 2 года назад
What’s the benefit over using the stands to the surface table ?
@Frank_inSA
@Frank_inSA 2 года назад
You cannot put the part itself on the plate, the errors of the bottom would add up to the errors on the top. And you wouldn't know which side the error is
@Imba-gt7qi
@Imba-gt7qi 2 года назад
the uderside is flat? no, it looks like mountains. so you dont know at wich 3 points this item stands. you cant level the top side, if its runnig down the hill, how you get flatness? you do this with the measuring mashine, the level divergence is calculatet and correkted.
@Frank_inSA
@Frank_inSA 2 года назад
@@Imba-gt7qi it doesn't matter whether the underside is flat or not, you wanna measure the flatness of the top By leveling at 3 different points the top is exactly parallel to the plate Then you compare the top to the plate
@Imba-gt7qi
@Imba-gt7qi 2 года назад
@@Frank_inSA yes thats why using 3 stands, without stands you cannot get a parallelism to the surface. (sorry for my bad englisch)
@therussianmachinists2409
@therussianmachinists2409 2 года назад
I wonder if you'd get less than .0033 flatness reading if you zero the high and low points...
@mfisu8
@mfisu8 Год назад
I’m sorry @ Travis Jarrett, but you are incorrect or ignore a lot of things in this video. I noticed you already replied to someone else’s comment that you are ignoring cosine error of the indicator, an important thing to state, although in this video your indicator was at a shallow angle so not a big deal in this video. However the biggest issue is that the method of checking flatness is incorrect. Using the ‘put the part on 3 jacks method’ , just zeroing out 3 points on the top surface and then sweeping the indicator over the surface and looking for the total variation doesn’t check the actual flatness. What you need to do is move the indicator back and forth all across the surface, constantly adjusting the jacks up and down to bring the indicator variation to a minimum. This can be a very difficult and time intensive process, which is why using a CMM is usually the best method. And why using a scanning CMM that can measure 100s or even 1000s of points would be best, rather than using a touch trigger CMM that only takes individual point hits. Your method will most likely give you a good idea of what the general flatness of the surface is, but at a fundamental level it is not technically correct. FARO has an okay article on their website that talks about this issue somewhat: www.faro.com/en/Resource-Library/Article/how-to-evaluate-flatness-in-gd-t under the section ‘using a height gage to evaluate flatness.
@shotokanjoable
@shotokanjoable Год назад
Some times old ways are still the best . Don't forget optical flatness gauges as well . Then optical comparator to ensure concentsity and parallelism between surfaces are Absolute
@agustinguzman1428
@agustinguzman1428 2 года назад
Jacks are not needed really. This inspection method is 100% appropriate if the goal is to quantify flatness. Assuming the reference surface is not in a "rocking condition", if the measured surface is parallel to the reference surface (the one with jacks) then one can determine that it is also within the flatness spec BUT if the measured surface it is not parallel within the flatness specification it MAY still meet the flatness spec. There's an overlap here. Parallelism also controls flatness but flatness does not control parallelism. The parallelism and flatness tolerance zones are the same. The main difference is that orientation (parallelism) error may add to the "flatness measurement". Sometimes speed is needed, sometimes accuracy. It all comes down to what you're trying to achieve. Nice video.
@rcandcnc9684
@rcandcnc9684 2 года назад
Machinist stone and granite table have one thing in common - I have only seen these on RU-vid. XD
@davidl.579
@davidl.579 2 года назад
Give us more manual please!
@gerryc2851
@gerryc2851 2 года назад
why put the part on jacks when the surface plate is already flat? doesn’t make sense to me since the height gauge is on the surface plate anyway
@GrandePunto8V
@GrandePunto8V 8 месяцев назад
Get an IQ test and then comment. Read other comments ("isolating a plane" method explained).
@gerryc2851
@gerryc2851 8 месяцев назад
@@GrandePunto8V stand by my comment
@yogi-smart4829
@yogi-smart4829 2 года назад
We are constantly fighting flatness on our aluminum (or any material) plate parts
@Ravero123
@Ravero123 2 года назад
Yeah material warping can be a bitch if you are removing a lot of stock
@yogi-smart4829
@yogi-smart4829 2 года назад
@@Ravero123 doesn't even have to be a lot. Really wish I could find a resource to learn and understand what's going on
@Ravero123
@Ravero123 2 года назад
@@yogi-smart4829 i am blind guessing right now but warping may come from internal stress from forging or heat treatment. Maybe using annealed material could help, or trying to remove even stock from both faces of plate. There really is a lot of factors there...
@yogi-smart4829
@yogi-smart4829 2 года назад
@@Ravero123 yeah forging processes barstock versus plate which way the grain runs lots and lots of variables.
@rushyahr7423
@rushyahr7423 Год назад
oh, i get it, because it references against that three point plane
@gillisdebilio4516
@gillisdebilio4516 2 года назад
Thanks for raising a low spot in my metrology knowledge.
@ThatOneStopSign
@ThatOneStopSign Год назад
This is basically how 3d printer beds are calibrated.
@stevetaylor996
@stevetaylor996 2 года назад
For all of us regulars to the channel we need to do better for The TITANS of CNC Machining. They put out great content and educational videos daily for new and seasoned machinist. Please take a moment and support them by hitting the LIKE button. When I see over 12000 views and just over 550 likes I feel like we can do better. Thanks, Just a fan of the channel.
@drewjohnson4794
@drewjohnson4794 2 года назад
I guess you saw my flatness comment the other day.
Далее
2DROTS vs WYLSACOM! КУБОК ФИФЕРОВ 1 ТУР
07:25
СОБАКИ ГОЛОДАЮТ ИЗ-ЗА ЛЕРЫ 🥲
01:00
No one will play with him( #standoff #meme #grenade
00:12
Flatness Tolerance - How to apply and measure
10:07
Просмотров 17 тыс.
SCHUNK: Unleashing The Power Of CNC Machining
28:32
Просмотров 31 тыс.
The Science Of Flatness
13:01
Просмотров 3,4 млн
Reading Optical Flats      Part 1
18:06
Просмотров 17 тыс.
How to Accurately Inspect a Flat Surface
7:30
Просмотров 89 тыс.
FLATNESS VS PARALLELISM PART 1
11:55
Просмотров 10 тыс.