How to PUSH with Long Pips OX? (by Amirreza Abbasi 🇮🇷) 

Thanks, analysing Amirreza makes me also learn a lot in the process. Welcome to this Pimples community

I don’t know about anti, he didn’t told me about it. But could be, you know that anti and pips are like brothers

@@diegox.longpips Yeah ☺️

👍👍👍

Nice to hear that is useful, this kind of comments motivate me to keep going . We are all learning. Some other kind of content that can be interesting for you?

Thanks for sharing it, I did check couple of them for the last season and didn’t get this movements. I think each player has different performance each time in specific matters

👏👏👏

Hola, gracias por el mensaje. Estoy en proceso de mudarme de país, pero en un par de semanas vuelven los vídeos con más y mejor contenido. Un abrazo

Yes, I totally agree. So interesting. I think he played with anti, I think this technique can be also applicable to it

@@diegox.longpips yeah, I remember he has always played with LP. Yes, the technique can also be used with anti.

Good to know, something more to try 😁

If you are looking for fastness monkey from Sauer and Tröger are the fastest I have ever try. If they are to fast and you don’t want to lose your control with them, Desperado Realoaded from Dr. Neubauer would be my suggestion, also fast ones but still possible to get some control. Regards

@@diegox.longpips Thanks

Is your blade zx gear in or out ?

I don’t use ZX, but if I would use it, I would prefer in version. Because it offers more control and still power. Depends also which pips are you using 😁

Thanks bro

Muchas gracias por tus palabras. La recomendación es que siempre pienses en que le interesa a la gente saber y que ofrezcas contenido con conocimiento y valor añadido. Eso es lo que genera más gancho y lo que le da más puntos al algoritmo para que te proponga. Al final, si dices cosas interesantes que la gente no sabe, naturalmente ellos van a ver más tiempo, que es lo que RU-vid quiere

Yes, you were the first. Thanks for the support 🥰

Thanks to you for watching it

🙏🙏🙏

Thanks my friend for being always there supporting 🙏

Next time you will be the first one. I’m sure about it

That is wooden one, right?

@@diegox.longpips Both are, but the japanese version is harder , more expensive. He is playing the cheap one

@midgard9552 ok, good to know. Thanks for the information

I will

@@diegox.longpips pls i will be waiting

Yes, couple of week. Hope you enjoy. I will try to keep with videos frequently 😁

@@diegox.longpips very unusual to hold racket xD

@serreylingpimpleoxplayer Yes, this is interesting, but for the pushing seems like it works

@@diegox.longpips well its what they say if it ain't broken don't fix it xD

Yes, I think is something works it is a good sign

Well, for him it works. But you are right that now we have some interesting options

Hola, es una pregunta muy interesante. La respuesta sería no, se genera un efecto diferente. Es verdad que en ambos casos ganas velocidad pero cuando pones una madera más rápida no necesariamente pierdes disrupción. La razona es que a diferencia de aumentar la velocidad mediante esponja, cuando lo haces con madera es una superficie dura la que incrementa la velocidad y no una blanda por lo que el efecto a nivel de inversión cambia de una opción a la otra. Para ponerte un ejemplo, es muy diferente lo que logra Albert Vilardell con su goma de picos largos con esponja ancha que lo que logra Manika Batra con una goma de picos largos OX en una madera rápida. Por mi experiencia, la goma de picos largos con esponja te da efecto y un juego más parabolico, mientras que la madera rápida te da un juego más lineal y profundo. Ambos son excelentes opciones dependiendo de lo que busques. Saludos

I don’t know it but I going to ask and let you know as soon he will answer 😁

@@diegox.longpips he anwser u ?

​@@Mateusz-ef5nqFD

@@MrAlmendr0 u sure?

@@Mateusz-ef5nq yes