12:45 You can also erase songs, which keep all other sounds. This is the downside of recording videos weeks in advance. It's a newer beta feature which work quite well.
It's frustrating to me when I compose a track from scratch and then I get a claim a week later. 70% of the time are fake claims , 30% similar melodies / soundfonts.
Some scammer makes a BS copyright claim by downloading from the RU-vid audio library the same track as you and adds their bit like singing, rapping etc. You use that same music from the library and they know it is free, but RU-vid's copyright matching system says you used their content - they know you did NOT infringe on them in any way, but they STILL claim against you to fraudulently receive any potential income from your hard work and RU-vid refers to them as the copyright owner - really boils my you know what.
Why is it that a company can strike your channel without any proof? Not claim, but strike. My content is original, fair use, but does use video game assets. I have hundreds of videos like this, but one day....a video game company just decided to strike my videos. No warning, no request for removal....just Strikes. We emailed back and forth and they ended up removing the strikes. But they had zero grounds for the strikes in the first place. YT did nothing to stop them
because youtube only cares about big company's and not creators. ''the mythology guy'' has over a million subs and he still gets false copyright claims.
@@WiseTree2939 i basically got bullied into taking down my videos because they found them to be controversial. That was after 16 emails back and forth. We made a "deal." I dont have the money to fight their claims in court, so to get the strikes removed, I said ok.
This is AI response to the question “Can a copyright holder reserve the right to display their content on the internet with interactive features?” >Yes, a copyright holder can reserve the right to display their content on the internet with interactive features, such as user comments and likes, while restricting others from doing so without permission. > >When a copyright holder licenses their work, they can specify the terms and conditions under which the work can be used, including whether it can be displayed with interactive features. If someone else displays the work without permission, or without adhering to the specified terms, they may be infringing on the copyright holder's exclusive rights. > >In the United States, for example, the Copyright Act of 1976 gives copyright holders the exclusive right to display their work publicly, including the right to determine how and in what context their work is displayed. This includes the right to decide whether their work is displayed with interactive features or not. > >It's worth noting that copyright laws vary by country, so the specifics of what rights are reserved by the copyright holder and what constitutes infringement may differ depending on the jurisdiction. If you have specific questions or concerns about copyright law, it's always a good idea to consult with a qualified legal professional.
I hope one day RU-vid lets us literally straight up replace the whole audio in a video. For example, think reediting the audio in your video in Premiere, then exporting it as an MP3 and uploading it, and RU-vid re-muxes the video with the new audio. :( Though I suppose bad actors would abuse such a feature somehow and ruin it for everyone.
This is the best explanation I've seen yet about RU-vid's copyright policy, including videos RU-vid itself has made about it. I do wish there were a more fair and clear system in place for creators, but it has gotten slightly better over the years.
I deal with unintentional music playing in pretty much every video I film since I cover car shows. I've heard I can dispute it, but it takes thirty days. I have learned to keep the clips short even though it takes much longer to film and edit. When I get a copyright notice while uploading a video I just go back an re-edit and re-upload. I'm going to try the song removal feature next time I get copyrighted, but I'm worried it will take too long to process since most of my videos are over an hour long. Wish RU-vid had a button to check when uploading that any music in the video is unintentional since it should fall under fair use since I'm covering a newsworthy event and didn't add the music myself. I have also tried using AI music tracks I made to cover up copyrighted music, but it looks like the record companies are coming after that next.
We have exactly the same question. We film carnivals, parades, street parties. It is impossible to publish a meaningful video of the event without including the original audio which we have no control over. We are recording events officially recognised as being of international touristic importance. This is cleary a case of fair use but some videos have ten or more copyright claims on them. We are eligible to monitize the channel but have refrained form doing so at the moment. How should we proceed?
well said: "it´s not perfect at all" ... From the view of a content creator: I fully produce my own material (reviews, diy-stuff, darts tipps) and found a channel, that uses parts of my content out of context and totally wrong messages. I couldn´t contact the other channel, because there was no mail, no adress and he deleted my comment directly and banned me of his channel. So i tried to claim my content and RU-vid not only gave the other channel my name and channelname, so that he knew it was me. RU-vid simply said "this is fair use" and gave ME a warning, that they will strike my channel if I go on with claims they decide for the other party. That said: since then the other channel insults me personally and pretty regularly for more than 12 months now and still uses my content as he wants to.
The most important thing is to always have proof that you have a license, or had one at the time you were using it. Everything else is just details, and you'll get that cleared, my friend 😉
A lot of the time that is not enough. For instance I had written permission to use someone photographs in an explanation video. However the video was still strciked by someone with multiple different names and was using one of my university friends images. he (assumingly) was placing a claim on the beauty of the photograph creator who me and the photograph creator had no idea who they were nor wanted the claim. The Copyright algorithm is great but it is also open to mass abuse. Even with evidence to counter the the fake copyright strikers claim and with RU-vid on Twitter getting involved. it was not enough for a computer to decide (literally no one on the copyright at RU-vid looked at the evidence). I had to then re upload the video with the identity of the Photographs blued something that the photograph creator was as she wanted her story told without censorship.
@@TrendlineProject I was going to make a video about it but after seeing similar content from other creators and realising I would be posting something outside of my niche I just thought what would be the point. A minority might see it and it would nit change anything.
Hi! I am using CAPCUT licensed music in many of my videos, so should I simply consider that the musical artists are making copyright claims unjustified, if they authorize their work to CAPCUT?
I'm having a similar problem with Clipchamp. I think it is mishandling of someone's copyright by third party websites that the apps are using. In the end, I stopped using music from editing apps because I don't trust that they've asked permission from the musicians or recording companies themselves but took a shortcut to third parties. That is my best guess when looking into it.
One extra piece of advice I would have liked to know before: **Save a copy of everything you receive and send** because AFAIK there is no way to check your history of claims/appeals. I have a video using a public domain version of classical music and it's getting claimed again and again. One of the times it got to an appeal and I was ready to get the strike and go to court because I was pissed off. The first time I had to dispute a claim the proof I sent was great but was lost once I sent it. You don't receive a copy in your email nor can check it afterwards. The time I had to dispute the appeal I ended up finding a video of the recording session of the piece and references of the license owner stating it was public domain. Now that text and links are stored in my docs so I can reuse it whenever it's claimed again.
We film carnivals, festivals and parades, nightlife etc. We live in major tourist destination with over 5 million visitors per year. The street parades can have for example 100 floats with huge sound systems. Many of these events are officially recognised as events of international touristic importance. The people at the event which we are filming are reacting to the music, but we have no control over the music being played. Likewise it is not possible to publish a meaningful video of the event without the background sound because the audience are dancing to it, singing along etc. Having read all the 'best practice' guidelines that even RU-vid direct us towards, our channel comes under the category of journalism. Fair use says that the sound recorded during the events is incidental and accidental as we have no control over it, nor are we directing or requesting the DJs play any particular song. The topic and reason of our videos is to promote the actual event we are recording. We haven't monitized the channel yet though we are eligible to do so. Many of our videos have copyright claims that say they have no effect on the channel. In some cases there may be 10 or more claims on one video. If we find we can't monitize a video and want to be paid for the hard work we put in to making it (three camera operators working on most of them) then do we have to dispute every single claim on a video individually or can we just claim fair use on the video overall due to journalistic exemption?
Nice to see some likes, but where to find advice how to make sure we are paid by RU-vid for our videos? After all we are the ones doing the hard work here and RU-vid run ads on our original content so I assume they are getting paid.
I had several copyright claims from a company in South America when my grandmother played her piano and sang old public domain gospel hymns on my channel. I disputed every one of the claims, and won the disputes, but haven't bothered to use any kind of music since.
I have heard of this. The company claims ownership of the basic melody of most gospel songs. Folks who post gospel videos run across this pretty much every time they post a video.
If ever I get a copyright claim or a copyright strike on one of my videos, I won't linger on at all, because it is pretty serious. I'll immediately remove my concerned video. No time to waste! No discussion with the owner of a Copyright! 2:23
Thanks for this information!!! I do have a question. Regarding “Reused Content.” Sometimes I like to publish both a “full version”of a video for those who want all the details and then publish another version that has been edited down with less details. Is using my own published content to create a shorter version from it a violation?
Okay you’ve convinced me. I was just going to make my channel an art journal but now I’m going to plan for some educational videos as well as I have some ideas that I’ve been bouncing around in my head. Btw if anyone is wondering I do not intend to teach art on my channel. That’s been overdone and at this point in art side of RU-vid there are so many people selling shovels that it’s hard to see the actual mines.
As someone who has faced both ends of the copyright/strike section I find it incredibly infuriating. When some one reuses large chunks of your original video and you cannot take money from it but only strike them (something that IMO limits free speech). Also the one occasional I was illegally striked by someone with multiple names using an image of one of my university friends supposedly someone else (how on earth is that allowed). Even when the image creator had not only given me permission to use the images but also claimed that the copyright striker was nothing to do with them and actively tried working with me to counter the strike. RU-vid atm are probably the best at representing copyright holder and protecting their rights (which is a must). However it also does not mean the system is perfect. The whole system is open to abuse, and they are countless examples including MR Beast where the system was abused . If I really wanted to I could create a bunch of random accounts and strike a number of Vid IQ channel of some one else and probably get away with it due to the lack of human moderation, and the fact I would have the final say (judge and jury). Im not a law expert and don't pretend to be. But What there needs is slight adaptation in policy. Checks and balances to make sure that only legal companies and relevant individuals can claim on breath of someone. When Escalation happens there needs to be human moderation something in my case would had easily solve the claimant as being a fraud, and finally for governments and authorities holding RU-vid to account to avoid the high profile cases like 'ObbyRaidz' and the 'fat rat' incidents.
This is AI response to the question “Can a copyright holder reserve the right to display their content on the internet with interactive features?” >Yes, a copyright holder can reserve the right to display their content on the internet with interactive features, such as user comments and likes, while restricting others from doing so without permission. > >When a copyright holder licenses their work, they can specify the terms and conditions under which the work can be used, including whether it can be displayed with interactive features. If someone else displays the work without permission, or without adhering to the specified terms, they may be infringing on the copyright holder's exclusive rights. > >In the United States, for example, the Copyright Act of 1976 gives copyright holders the exclusive right to display their work publicly, including the right to determine how and in what context their work is displayed. This includes the right to decide whether their work is displayed with interactive features or not. > >It's worth noting that copyright laws vary by country, so the specifics of what rights are reserved by the copyright holder and what constitutes infringement may differ depending on the jurisdiction. If you have specific questions or concerns about copyright law, it's always a good idea to consult with a qualified legal professional.
as someone who makes videos in my niche, i get a lot of copyright claims and i mute the copyrighted sounds. however i don't know if my content is considered fair use. i hope i don't get rejected when aplying for the ypp
For videos with over 100k views you can't even edit it to remove the copyright material. I have a joint account with my sister where we make fanvids/AMVs/crackvids and we got a copyright claim for a 17 second song clip that completely blocked one of our crackvids. The video had over 100k views so we couldn't do anything to remove that part and it had been up for over 5 years before they claimed and blocked our video. We contested the claim and they rejected it, but luckily they modified the terms so that it was only blocked in certain regions and now it's back up. RU-vid should at the very least allow editing to fix copyright issues regardless of the view count.
I heard that a lots of people who makes music get copyright claims on their music. Sometimes even big music companies (upload services) are behind those false claims. But they win in the end. How to prevent that?
What frustrates me is when you download music from a Royalty Free website like pixabay and a 3rd party on behalf of the owner hits you with a copyright claim. I use a certain song on one of my youtube channels in the intro so I get a claim on every video I upload. If a song is on any Royalty Free website it should be intelligible for copyright claim at any time on RU-vid. I appreciate RU-vid working with creators to protect their original content and I applaud that. However, I think some adjustment still needs made and if any song is found to be on a Royalty Free site RU-vid needs to make it ineligible from copyright claim.
Hello Fellow RU-vidrs ,i have a question Do movie clip/trailer channels get monetized ,because when i tried to upload movie trailer RU-vid says Copyrighted content cannot be monetized .Please help
Its so not fair. My little brother creates small clips on his RU-vid channel with just a few seconds of a song and gets copyright claims for it despite using his own photos and videos 😢
This was extremely helpful. I will often put the music I used in the description and it helps from getting copyrighted but it only works when the video is private first. I wish there was a way if your video gets copyrighted later on after being posted and you take action and put the music you used in the description and it goes away. I’ve tried all of those four ways and it really screwed up my videos.
It’s hard to make music as a musician sometimes I had a copyright on my song…some other musician used the same music that’s royalty free music from my song
I got hit by a scam artist on my channel with music that I created 100% on my own. No loops, beats or samples used. I disputed it and the company still said they had a claim. I reported it to youtube. For mine, they're trying to claim monetization when my videos don't even make money. It's just bs and so draining to deal with. If youtube doesn't stop this, I'm just removing all my original music.
The one i get really frustrated with is I have paid for licenses to use clips of music and yet 2 or 3 different people will claim copyright on it even on RU-vids own music for creators and we are expected to remove it. If its not meant for content creators use then why have they added it to programs we pay for or why is RU-vid themselves allowing us to use the music when people are being copyrighted for it. It is incredibly frustrating for many people especially smaller channels and it appears to happen more the closer they are to monetization or if it is just after. It is almost like a spite attack by trolls. I've even had one where the person who made the original claim was not the person cited when I put in the appeal with the license information and it was STILL turned down.
i did not get monetized because RU-vid felt i had reused content. My show is a paranormal talk show and a lot of the guests I have on are making the rounds of other shows. I am a journalist in real life. I ask them questions and they answer. i am careful about copying anyone's content. The show is broadcast live. I don't know what to do. I guess ill have to find funding elsewhere.
If a channel produced 4 separate video tutorials with all original content… later makes a condensed montage into a new highlights video would that be ineligible reused content ???? Thanks to anyone who responds
I don't get copyright claims but if I use music from Share Factory Studio over the top of game play videos I get copyright issues. They say it's not a "copyright strike" so I don't bother doing anything. If my channel gets bigger I'll hire someone to do that tedious stuff for me, that's the dream.
You can find more information on copyright claims and copyright strikes here: ru-vid.comjRRKK7kCnhA ru-vid.comkjHao9f3ggQ ru-vid.comGcMeVYsp9Rc ru-vid.comiUlUFO9kghQ ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mVc4oW2OVhM.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NhA_WTcMnic.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bBV80MgmEz8.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2_o6qLP85rM.html
Very fair the reused content is not, because they are only going to comment on it first if you want to be in the youtube program. Before that they did use the same videos to make their own money by showing ads when someone watches those videos, and then when you apply for monitazition they are going to say we won't allow it! Well smart considering they make money from it by showing ads and the owner of the channel is sent hiking.
I had this happen with one of my most recent videos. Got an automatic claim from an artist for using their music. Problem is, I didn't use their music. I used a sound clip from a 23 year old video game. The artist that RU-vid flagged as a copyright, sampled that same video games sound clip in their song. I'm disputing it hard, because if anyone is going to file a claim, i want it to be the person that actually made the original track.
I have a music countdown channel, which is exclusively shorts. I've had to alter one video due to a copyright claim, and another video got blocked in Russia and Belarus. Apparently, some people aren't allowed to listen to Little Red Corvette by Prince.
I clicked on some of those before and I thought it was okay just to leave them alone but it looks like I'm going to have to watch your video all the way here and finish watching it and see what I need to do
I got copyright claims on some of my gaming videos because of music but it says that it has no affect on my channel , is it better to mute it or just leave it be ?
One time, one of my favorite RU-vidrs got false copyright claims from a channel who was banned from a game for cheating that the youtuber used to post videos of, so they would try to get channels that made vids on that game taken down. Couple days later, the youtuber who got false copyright claims had their channel taken down, later that day they got back up, and I just checked, and the youtuber who gave the false copyright claims got their channel deleted.
There are 2 channels who reused our videos, downloaded, then uploaded them,one replacing the live audio with a vinyl recording and RU-vid tells us that we reused their videos, apparently the AI and the person double checking cant read dates.
I am having a copyright content issue with a video I’m trying to upload. The contains my music and some photos I downloaded. Before uploading my vid to YT, I first uploaded the separate video and audio elements (to make sure there was no copyright issue) and there was no copyright issue found. Great. But when I uploaded the complete video, copyright content was found. How can that be? Any idea? Thanks.
You honestly should only use the "remove song" feature. No risks, no problems, no big affect on your video. Gets back the monetisation, and you will get money, never give up 🚩
I had used music with commercial rights, and content from public places such as pixabay & utube and I keep getting copyrights notification, even strikes; wrongly, even for the music does not fall within copyright and it is not the music claimed by that artist. What to do in this case?
If you have a video which you split into short clips - then do a long video with all the clips included together - will RU-vid class that as being Re-used content?
reused content.. i do videos for babies to sleep and I do my own animations with paid audio segments. I have the same video but with different lengths like 2 hours, 5 hours or 8 hours. RU-vid decided that this is reused content...
You have no idea how perfect this videos timing is. One of my videos in getting super popular, but it got copyright claimed. I'll have to use these tips.
I have used epidemic sound songs and gotten “copyright- but user allows songs to be used on RU-vid”. I’m not monetized yet so I don’t know how it affects me.
What if one of my videos was deleted by youtube for copyright claim, but now the video creator who made the claim has deleted his videos. Can i get my video up again ?
Sometimes Claims will be evolved or backfired into a strike when a copyrighted video remains very long tho is only a chance and another chance for a block
Help! What about "playlist videos"? Those are one long video that contains several musics. I see lots of channels posting this kind of video but when I uploaded mine it got blocked worldwide 😢
I am a singer with a cover song channel, I have received a number of claims not strikes but only doing this to gain an audience not money. How can I get around this please?
I'm new to RU-vid myself, growing slowly but surely, and I've gotten a copyrighted message, not a strike tho, still would like to get rid of those copyright of my videos
Talking about copyright, how about videos or shorts, using AI to generate stories, images, scripts, etc. But I always mentioned it in my description for every video. And of course, I always use some of my own scripts. If a company likes you using their tools, it should be allowed because we are also promoting their tools. It's a win-win for both creators and the company. Maybe vidIQ can make a video about this or related if possible. Thanks. 🤔
I received my 1st copyright strike earlier today. There's a few things that i dont understand though. When i uploaded it, RU-vid didnt flag up any kind of issue. My copyright strike today was the result of the copyright owner requesting a takedown. Now, they took down 3 videos, but left 2 others on my channel (I have since removed them myself) Next, on doing a search on RU-vid, my videos that were removed and which ended with me receiving a copyright strike, the same programmes are plastered all over RU-vid. I just dont understand it 😢😢😢
Pardon me but I have reached minimum monetisation requirements but YT tells me I need to build channel history. I have not had any channel strikes... how do I go about this
You can find more information on copyright claims and copyright strikes here: ru-vid.comjRRKK7kCnhA ru-vid.comkjHao9f3ggQ ru-vid.comGcMeVYsp9Rc ru-vid.comiUlUFO9kghQ ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mVc4oW2OVhM.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NhA_WTcMnic.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bBV80MgmEz8.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2_o6qLP85rM.html
How do the musicians who play their own instrument to songs like idk metallica or avenged sevenfold etc fall into the copyright arena? Is it considered edited or new content? I uploaded a couple vids with me playing guitar to songs and got a copyright notification so I guess it sounds pretty accurately note for note to get the notification and I am pleased with my guitar skills there, though it's not like I uploaded the original song, it's a cover, but I still get a notification which may affect my channel?
RU-vid Studio has a channel copyright tab that shows you when people have used your content. When attempting to copyright strike them, you must consider first if their video falls within the domain of "Fair Use". You can also use this feature to DM the offending party. You could ask for compensation for your work, or whatever you want to let them use your work.
So, why should I get a copyright claim when I’m playing a video game from a very popular and big video game company when the game was released by said company?
My channel is 'Walk with Me.' I received a strike for using a photo of a person in a thumbnail, which I took myself. In the action options, I only had the option to delete the video and couldn’t even dispute the claim that I took the photo myself. I was forced to delete my best-performing video, and after this, my channel's impressions decreased. Is there really anything I can do?
I dud this step 6:14 i use emotes 6:31 7:18 keep watching 7:36 waiting for mine 8:08 I don't own rights to 2022 remixed Rick roll dance. The emote in Fortnite is Never Gonna 9:15
But it literally says ""the owner allowed the content to be used on RU-vid!!!" So why am i being copyrighted then?! Does that mean the owner shares revenue with me ?!
12:13 a question about that RU-vid says that when this Copyright Match Tool found new matches in RU-vid Studio they will send bell notifications but i don't receive any notifications while the Tool is finding matches alot of times I don't understand what happened Cau ya help me please 🙏 😢 Thanks 😊
Maybe check your notifications are setup correctly to receive copyright matches. Otherwise, contact YT support through the studio dashboard (if you are monetized).
hiya ive had a copyright claim on my uncharted 2 gameplay by Hexacorp (music publishing) and only 1 video out of the many uncharted 2 gameplay videos has been copyright claim can someone help me out please
I don't know why Studio's UI for this is so goofy. Why can you only see the details of a claim by mousing over things? It feels almost intentionally bad.
