Check this out 1L don't let the language confuse you. Joinder is just that - we are joining claims and/or parties not just claims (OR) parties as the professor said. If done wrongly then you'll deal with misjoinder analysis.
FRCP 13 14 19 and 20 are all classified as Either Compulsory or Permissible Joinders of Claims and Parties. 13a= compulsory claim 13b= permissible claim 14= impleader 19= compulsory party 20= permissible party
This is totally unrelated to this video yet immeasurably coincidental and cool, but I see you served on an LDS mission. Where did you serve? (I did, too).
Glad you enjoyed the video. Send us a DM on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram if you have any questions or need help preparing for the Bar! We've got your back. -Kendra from Kaplan
Joinder between the living and the dead. An adhesion contract between the living man and his strawman full legal name. Moving the living into the venue of the dead. Administrator is the trustee of the intestate accounts of the deceased at law. 'You' is the customer. 'Person' is a corporate paper fiction of law. 2 b(e)rth certificates, 2 dates of birth, 2 names.
so, I cannot bring an federal action against 2 defendants whom injured me in the same way and are part of the same corporation, but committed the injury in different states at different times??
This is good, but what about when the claim may be bound up in a state created right or obligation, then the state law would be used. Also, if the state law interferes with the federal court being its own independent judicial body, the federal law would be used. I feel those are two more points that are essential to an Erie analysis.
Perhaps we'll share this in a future video! It's worth noting that this lecture pertains directly to personal jurisdiction. Feel free to reach out with any additional questions!
