Hasselblad would benefit from a larger sensor - 6x4.5, similar to H6d-100. Everything else every other camera company has already done in medium format.
@@s4nguine_ + anti-shake function. Image sensor's defects increase with device area. That translate to its cost. Cost reduction would be possible if under demand. Also writing to native 6X6 would take longer, demand more power, much more heat and less pictures per battery, Then what is the real merit of medium format if resolution of image sensor is high enough while the noise was low and dynamic range is good? Large film size was much easier so we can get large picture, large printout. I wonder when we can get a life size digital printout of our portrait? "I am standing next to a life size 2D rendering of me!"
note: at 4:09 the 'T' lever doesn't work like that, it only functions on the BUTTON, it locks it, the cable release hits the switch further inside this sleeve, which the button also hits. To do what you are showing, aka for live view, you need a CF lens and set it to F mode, to keep the shutter open, then operate the m-up switch, or press the paddle of the 200 series rearwards, this opens the shutter/Baffle, so you can now see through the camera +lens, re-cock to shoot.
I wonder what difference, both procedure-wise and the final result, among different V series, i.e. 500 series, 2000 series and 200 series, mated with 907x 100c? 1) Lack of metering capability of 500 and 2000 series, can we use the live view function of digital back to get through-the-lens EV values? 2) The difference between focal plane shutter, like 2000 and 200 series, and digital back cfv 100C's e-shutter in terms of rolling shutter effect? Dose it make C lens with in-lens shutter a better choice? Do you suggest C/CF lens with leaf shutter a better choice so for owners of 2000/200 would keep focal plane shuter open and use C/CF lens shutter speed up to 1/500? 3) If so what would be the real advantage of F lens, like 110mm/f2?
