Тёмный

How Uranium Becomes Nuclear Fuel 

Seeker
Подписаться 5 млн
Просмотров 1,5 млн
50% 1

Nuclear technology is constantly in the news. So how exactly do you make nuclear fuel?
Special thanks to Life Noggin for animating this video! Check them out: / lifenoggin
Read More:
Fuel Cycle Facilities
www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cyc...
“The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulates uranium recovery facilities that mill uranium; fuel cycle facilities that convert, enrich, and fabricate it into fuel for use in nuclear reactors, and deconversion facilities that process the depleted uranium hexafluoride for disposal.”

Uranium processing
www.britannica.com/EBchecked/t...
“Uranium (U), although very dense (19.1 grams per cubic centimetre), is a relatively weak, nonrefractory metal. Indeed, the metallic properties of uranium appear to be intermediate between those of silver and other true metals and those of the nonmetallic elements, so that it is not valued for structural applications.”
About Nuclear Fuel Cycle
infcis.iaea.org/NFCIS/About.c...
“Nuclear Fuel Cycle can be defined as the set of processes to make use of nuclear materials and to return it to normal state. It starts with the mining of unused nuclear materials from the nature and ends with the safe disposal of used nuclear material in the nature.”
Nuclear Fuel Processes
www.nei.org/Knowledge-Center/N...
“Nuclear power plants do not burn any fuel. Instead, they use uranium fuel, consisting of solid ceramic pellets, to produce electricity through a process called fission.”
____________________
DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos twice daily.
Watch More DNews on TestTube testtube.com/dnews
Subscribe now! ru-vid.com_c...
DNews on Twitter / dnews
Trace Dominguez on Twitter / tracedominguez
Julia Wilde on Twitter / julia_sci
DNews on Facebook / discoverynews
DNews on Google+ gplus.to/dnews
Discovery News discoverynews.com
Download the TestTube App: testu.be/1ndmmMq

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

19 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,9 тыс.   
@anatolydyatlov4103
@anatolydyatlov4103 5 лет назад
Please stop listening those ameteurs. Ask me your questions comrades.
@wisnuyogapraditya6108
@wisnuyogapraditya6108 5 лет назад
So. You really didn't see the graphite?
@anatolydyatlov4103
@anatolydyatlov4103 5 лет назад
@@wisnuyogapraditya6108 you are having a shock. Someone take him to infirmary.
@Overneed-Belkan-Witch
@Overneed-Belkan-Witch 5 лет назад
Everytime I ask, you were in Toilet
@anatolydyatlov4103
@anatolydyatlov4103 5 лет назад
@@Overneed-Belkan-Witch you are delusional
@armypilot94
@armypilot94 5 лет назад
How bad is it with 3.6 roentgen? Great or terrible?
@lifenoggin
@lifenoggin 9 лет назад
Thanks for letting us do animations for the video!
@user-on9im8lu2h
@user-on9im8lu2h 6 лет назад
Life Noggin, hi I am a huge fan.
@zerosubscribersvideos1543
@zerosubscribersvideos1543 5 лет назад
You're welcome
@TiberiusStorm
@TiberiusStorm 5 лет назад
The humble brag!
@Me27399
@Me27399 5 лет назад
Amazing channel life noggin
@stevemacbr
@stevemacbr 5 лет назад
Perhaps - In so doing,... you are also participating in the PRO-NUCLEAR propaganda machine,... not taking into consideration the real dangers of these purified man-made products & the disposal issues of them,... including all of the dangerous chemical waste needed to produce them. . .
@adrianashby1033
@adrianashby1033 5 лет назад
I could count the times I've been to Chernobyl on one hand. yep 7 times.
@NOWUNITEDUPDATES
@NOWUNITEDUPDATES 5 лет назад
Adrian Ashby copy paste 🤔
@Shadow77999
@Shadow77999 5 лет назад
Hhahhaha
@patchesproductions3
@patchesproductions3 5 лет назад
Me too, high 7.
@lintonfr
@lintonfr 4 года назад
Huh, I've been about 30 times
@adrianashby1033
@adrianashby1033 4 года назад
@@lintonfr wow both hands
@minieclipsvevo764
@minieclipsvevo764 5 лет назад
Chernobyl turned me into a scientist lol
@rabinarayanmajhi7497
@rabinarayanmajhi7497 5 лет назад
Me too
@EmadGhasemiDev
@EmadGhasemiDev 5 лет назад
Me too, I had no interesting in nuclear knowledge. but now ? I'm reading and watching ...
@kaladrian2566
@kaladrian2566 5 лет назад
Yeah me too. This thing is in my head can't get it out
@adrianenterprise5829
@adrianenterprise5829 4 года назад
SAME
@gladonos3384
@gladonos3384 4 года назад
This set of comments is terrifying...
@machigiceb7788
@machigiceb7788 5 лет назад
I've always hated anything math related like Chemistry and Physics, but after watching Chernobyl I've been getting all these nuclear and chernobyl related recommendation videos and I'm eager to learn all about it
@Coolcat2119
@Coolcat2119 5 лет назад
Machi Giceb the same goes with me. I just graduated with a bachelors degree and I’m in denial already because this subject of nuclear energy is so interesting. I was never good at math in high school which turned me off to s.t.e.m degrees. I wonder what level of math it takes to become a nuclear expert or engineer who gets to party in this realm.
@v44n7
@v44n7 3 года назад
@@Coolcat2119 it requires a lot, but math can be learned. Learn the concepts and apply them in physics for example and you will learn the beauty in math and you will be much better at it. I always failed math in primary school and secondary school. But I managed to finish calculus and linear algebra in college afterward. It took me some time to master It, but I did.
@Coolcat2119
@Coolcat2119 3 года назад
@@v44n7 Thank you! Your story is inspiring!
@faascencio
@faascencio 2 года назад
Same here! After watching the mini series On HBO, I can’t get enough about learning about nuclear reactors and uranium-235……..lol
@liquidbraino
@liquidbraino Год назад
You'd probably love Richard Feynman's lecture titled "Los Alamos From Below". It's available on RU-vid and it's actually pretty funny, Feynman was a character; very mischievous, picking people's locks and always challenging authority; challenging peoples assumptions and sometimes even embarrassing the sh*t out of NASA when he exposed what they were trying to cover up.
@isthisyourbike1911
@isthisyourbike1911 5 лет назад
watched Chernobyl first, almost done watching anything related to nuclear energy on youtube now....
@joaquinbustillosarce5171
@joaquinbustillosarce5171 5 лет назад
Is this Your bike? Same here! 👍🏻👌🏻
@nuguns3766
@nuguns3766 4 года назад
Check out bionerd, she does work around Chernobyl
@anirbandas9315
@anirbandas9315 5 лет назад
SITNIKOV please tell me, how an RBMK reactor core explodes.
@kelly2fly
@kelly2fly 5 лет назад
That's impossible!!!
@wino0000006
@wino0000006 5 лет назад
I've been told it's the equivalent of a chest xray.
@matthewthomas2546
@matthewthomas2546 5 лет назад
@@wino0000006 oh, so it's not actually that bad
@wino0000006
@wino0000006 5 лет назад
@Googly Pops You are confused. RBMK reactors don't explode.
@jhbrown53
@jhbrown53 5 лет назад
It didn't happen, it was just a roof fire
@megagene
@megagene 9 лет назад
Trace is my favourite DNews host. Of all the hosts, he's the one who always sounds like he actually understands what he's talking about (even if he really doesn't) as opposed to just reading off a teleprompter.
@DamianReloaded
@DamianReloaded 9 лет назад
I think DNews is a pretty cool guy. eh talks sienze and doesn't afraid of anything.
@DiraNightcore
@DiraNightcore 9 лет назад
Damian Reloaded That sentence gave me brain cancer.
@DiraNightcore
@DiraNightcore 9 лет назад
Damian Reloaded Unfortunately I am not into self harm, so I will not drill a hole in my skull. Nor do I care about zombies, let them come at me.
@TraceDominguez
@TraceDominguez 9 лет назад
We all write our episodes too! So I try my best understand. ;)
@DamianReloaded
@DamianReloaded 9 лет назад
Ame Nightcore and all the references went through and past you as if you were made of thin air... ^_^
@walker2006au
@walker2006au 5 лет назад
Chernobyl Tv Series brought me here.
@coltonconnor112
@coltonconnor112 5 лет назад
Me too comrade.
@Igornopolis
@Igornopolis 5 лет назад
Yes.
@hardwork2666
@hardwork2666 5 лет назад
Me too !
@Darkwizzrobe
@Darkwizzrobe 5 лет назад
youtube recommendations brought me here
@JackMcDonnell91
@JackMcDonnell91 5 лет назад
lol same
@navtium
@navtium 9 лет назад
It's still one of the cleanest and one of the most efficient and reliable sources of power. It also has the highest proportion of power generated to power needed to process fuel. The main problem is that due to the uproar against nuclear energy all of the reactors are at least 30 years old... that's not good, since the technology advanced so much that if you were to build a nuclear reactor now it would be almost 10 times as safe as the existing ones.
@RentableSocks
@RentableSocks 9 лет назад
MaxFist Yet people refuse to allow new nuclear plants to be built. I hate people.
@Thecarlosbrochannel
@Thecarlosbrochannel 9 лет назад
MaxFist can I ask you a question, why is their smoke coming out of nuclear plants
@RentableSocks
@RentableSocks 9 лет назад
carlos almaraz That's steam, not smoke. Those are cooling towers, there are no combustion chambers in nuclear plants.
@Thecarlosbrochannel
@Thecarlosbrochannel 9 лет назад
OHHHHHHH
@Somezable
@Somezable 9 лет назад
I don't think the main problem is negative public opinion, more crippeling problem is money: Goverments don't have funds to make safer plants and companies won't spend money to improve thing unless they get more money from that. It should be made so, that a goverment agency would force power companies to update their plants, but as long as companies influence regulations, it's never going to happen. Best thing of all would be upgrading oldest plants into thorium reactors.
@thedeaner3117
@thedeaner3117 6 лет назад
Jesus, I've been watching nuclear related videos, now I'm afraid the FBI is gonna show up at my door
@martyvlrjr2333
@martyvlrjr2333 3 года назад
You and me both
@presidentofallfoodnice8113
@presidentofallfoodnice8113 2 года назад
U can buy it.onlone
@sturggaming6759
@sturggaming6759 4 года назад
Everyone’s gangsta until the fuel rods start jumping
@qqq1701
@qqq1701 9 лет назад
I had yellow cake uranium with vanilla frosting for my birthday.
@ReviewMemeNSA
@ReviewMemeNSA 9 лет назад
qqq1701 I had $2ØØ worth of cheese for my birthday
@ReviewMemeNSA
@ReviewMemeNSA 9 лет назад
***** Can I hab a da canzur pls baws?
@assman7969
@assman7969 9 лет назад
ReviewMemeNSA 0x00 ey b0ss I habe cansur.
@HomeSkillenSLICE
@HomeSkillenSLICE 9 лет назад
Hello fellow review tech USA viewer and troll lol
@RainierKine
@RainierKine 9 лет назад
You'll be glowing FOREVER.... o_o
@floopy312
@floopy312 8 лет назад
Please can you make a video about Thorium reactors?
@thomaskn1012
@thomaskn1012 7 лет назад
Hopefully, Thorium molten salt reactors will get the attention of Bill Gates, Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos and one of them can get it going. Our government seems to be dragging its feet on this issue. Even China is ahead of us on getting a working Thorium reactor.
@GrayShark09
@GrayShark09 7 лет назад
LFTRs!!! ;)
@april5054
@april5054 7 лет назад
i.e. bullshit reactors.
@GrayShark09
@GrayShark09 7 лет назад
+CSmith.Develop Yes! It uses U-233, but Thorium is the natural fertile fuel to start with. Thorium is turning to U-233 after breeding! For the start up U-235 is needed to make neutrons; or a neutron ray could be used directly!
@subvet657
@subvet657 5 лет назад
@@april5054 just because you don't understand it doesn't make it bullshit.
@inkbridge3828
@inkbridge3828 9 лет назад
Loved the use of graphics to explain the process... hoping to see more of those in future videos as well... Great content once again... Thanks
@Grahf0
@Grahf0 5 лет назад
"A nuclear reactor makes electricity by-" "Good. Now I know how a nuclear reactor works."
@charcoaledlife7096
@charcoaledlife7096 5 лет назад
theres graphite on the roof.
@taiwanisacountry3117
@taiwanisacountry3117 5 лет назад
it's too radioactive, robots won't work...
@MegaBackfromhell
@MegaBackfromhell 5 лет назад
You didn’t see it so it isn’t there. Change my mind
@samtoshner8002
@samtoshner8002 5 лет назад
He's in shock. Take him to the infirmary.
@matispure2
@matispure2 5 лет назад
LOL
@ArjunVerma-wx7tf
@ArjunVerma-wx7tf 5 лет назад
3.6 rontgen not great not terrible
@defencebangladesh4068
@defencebangladesh4068 5 лет назад
Was Watching Cheronobyl and i am here.
@buco5613
@buco5613 5 лет назад
We dont care
@richhoule3462
@richhoule3462 5 лет назад
@@buco5613 :I do you pompous ass. Chernobyl was an AWESOME miniseries! Let the man speak his mind!
@DaleDirt
@DaleDirt 6 лет назад
Thank You for your expertise and breakdown of the many processes involved .
@karthikkashyap4557
@karthikkashyap4557 9 лет назад
Trace is the best.....keep it up man.You make it interesting to watch your videos....... i hope you make a lot of good one ,just like the ones you make....Good luck
@TraceDominguez
@TraceDominguez 3 года назад
Oh man this video is a CLASSIC. Sometimes you dig into complicated and advanced science and realize… it's really just spinning stuff over and over and over again. So nuts!
@danielson1989
@danielson1989 4 года назад
I’ve always loved the physics behind this and have always understood how the process works, which makes me aware of Nuclear power and not afraid of it. Nuclear Power is the only power generation where the waste is contained. Coal, Gas is pumped into the atmosphere, Solar and wind go to land fill at the end of life. Yes Nuclear power plants are required to be built and extremely maintained.
@liquidbraino
@liquidbraino Год назад
Tell that to the people at Chernobyl, three mile island and Fukushima.
@danielson1989
@danielson1989 Год назад
@@liquidbraino of course i’m a complete fucked stupid fucken idiot uranium is the reason why people cut corners on building things and doing things in the cheap. You are an absolute salami
@vankike7
@vankike7 9 лет назад
Loved the new graphics to explain the process!
@woody500z
@woody500z 9 лет назад
Loving the new animations you guys have going.
@orion134
@orion134 8 лет назад
you didn't mention Heavy Water reactors like the CANDO developed in Canada. they don't require enriched uranium, use 30%- 40% less fuel and are more efficient. The reason why America uses the much more complicated and expensive and dangerous light water reactors is because when they were developed after the second world war they needed the enrichment facilities to create the fuel needed for nuclear weapons.
@gardenguyvic
@gardenguyvic 8 лет назад
+Dirks 2.0 Yea it's fucking stupid, we can't use modern reactors.
@BYWaudio
@BYWaudio 8 лет назад
+Dirks 2.0 I'm Canadian, and no CANDU are not safe at all, I would say probably one of the worst, I mean they are all dangerous, but for what I know CANDU is a horizontal design, meaning the full is place horizontally not vertically, which has a major flaw if the level of water plunge; the gravity will force the full spend to curve and even touch one another making the whole containment unstable. So for that I see high risk. Also the principle of using heavy water facilate the production of plutonium 239, finally 1% of tritium simply goes directly in the atmosphere. Early version of the reactor "Chalk River" was used for production of plutonium during the American nuclear program in late 40's
@leerman22
@leerman22 8 лет назад
+blackypain How does the fuel channels touching spell environmental disaster though? There is always the vacuum building to stop releases. That is just something that needs avoiding, with backup generators and the lack of tsunamis coming off of Lake Ontario. The reaction would be sub-critical with a lack of moderator. The amount of tritium that escapes is also trace, minuscule compared to radon emissions of gas. The plutonium would also have too much Pu240 in it to make a useful bomb from the fuel burnup standards of today, and then there are international regulators.
@babulkumar6254
@babulkumar6254 5 лет назад
I don't Understand light water reactor?? please explain it to me.
@anthonystark9390
@anthonystark9390 5 лет назад
@@babulkumar6254 Light water is made with hydrogen that has no neutrons and heavy water is water made with deuterium which is hydrogen that has 1 neutron. Deuterium is heavier hence, heavy water. The water is then used as a coolant and a moderator. Coolant - obviously to cool the reactor. Moderator - helps slow down the neutrons born from fission to a suitable kinetic energy for the fuel source to absorb a neutron, fission, and generate more neutrons to keep the reaction going.
@brucelamberton8819
@brucelamberton8819 5 лет назад
@2:20 when you mention "U3O8" you make it sound like another isotope of uranium (eg uranium-238), rather than the compound triuranium octoxide (U3 O8). However, if you somehow have managed to make a new isotope whose nucleus is stable with an extra 70 neutrons, then I congratulate you for this remarkable achievement!
@GreenskinHolland
@GreenskinHolland 5 лет назад
This vid actually explains the chemistry behind it all. I thank you for that ! very intereresting .
@tessasmith2484
@tessasmith2484 8 лет назад
Thank you. You presented that incredibly well thanks from NZ
@muhammadsufyanshah5095
@muhammadsufyanshah5095 5 лет назад
The briefing and the host, both are really great! I think there is always positive ways to use up things, so the advancement in nuclear power stuff should be done for development and the better/efficient standard of power generation. Although using it the wrong way i.e. nuclear weapons is surely destructive, thus a bad idea.
@jimvo
@jimvo 5 лет назад
Its almost inconcievable how people figured all this out. How many errors, how many people died figuring this stuff out?
@SkodzGaming
@SkodzGaming 5 лет назад
Exactly what im wondering.
@TroggyPK
@TroggyPK 5 лет назад
Two people to put it simply, marie curie and her husband.
@jaishetty8586
@jaishetty8586 6 лет назад
Clear explanation. I loved watching it. So watched it thrice over. Thank you
@CodySymesYEG
@CodySymesYEG 7 лет назад
Good job on the spinning graphics! I enjoyed that
@daransaxby8531
@daransaxby8531 9 лет назад
Can you please do a video about interstellar travel and how we could get to other solar systems?
@wino0000006
@wino0000006 5 лет назад
The most efficient source of energy.
@timstring0902
@timstring0902 9 лет назад
Great article and nice animations in the middle explaining the purification of uranium atoms :)
@johnmcdonald6933
@johnmcdonald6933 8 лет назад
Dude love the in tell and the pace didn't bore me like some do and wasn't trying to confuse like some do. first time watching but now im a fan.
@OnePingOnly
@OnePingOnly 9 лет назад
Could you do a video on the two different types of Nuclear Fusion? The one the Russians use which I believe uses magnets to try to control the plasma and the European one, which uses lasers. Although they don't really work yet, it would be cool to see how they should work in practice.
@Jemalacane0
@Jemalacane0 5 лет назад
Actually, uranium is more like 3 million times as energy dense as fuel than coal. I love nuclear power.
@bored588
@bored588 5 лет назад
i love radiation too.
@Jemalacane0
@Jemalacane0 3 года назад
@@bored588 As do I. It makes me warm. If it weren't for the nuclear reactor in the sky, I would freeze to death. Because the DNA in cancer cells is unstable and degraded, cancer cells are killed by ionizing radiation before other cells. Not to mention that reactor in the sky produces ultraviolet rays which cause the body to produce vitamin d and serotonin. But, some nonsense about the idea that low level ionizing radiation cannot provide health benefits.
@AERYS.
@AERYS. Год назад
@@bored588 yeah, I love visible radiation too, it hits the rods and cones in our eyes so we could see the reflected electromagnetic waves from objects.
@longfordboy2538
@longfordboy2538 4 года назад
Really nice work ! 1 I really appreciate this. Well done and very understandable Thank you
@SeverSTL
@SeverSTL 5 лет назад
That is exactly what I wanted to know. It's been bothering me. Thanks and well explained.
@janjankovicjahoda
@janjankovicjahoda 5 лет назад
If you read this in 2019, we are already building the fusion reactor in France, go Mankind :-D
@18spara
@18spara 9 лет назад
I love Nuclear Energy. The 4th-gen reactors are amazing, 90-95% energy used and passive safety i.e they can't crash. The Thorium reactors now being developed in China is also a promising piece of work. (I know there are better or more precise words, but I'm not native english so pardon me, I don't usually talk about nuclear power in english).
@AkhmadMizkat
@AkhmadMizkat 6 лет назад
What a clear an fun explanation.. Thank you!
@robthehitmanrude
@robthehitmanrude 9 лет назад
Can you do a video on Thorium LFTR reactors? I know you covered a bit on them in another video but this technology needs its own. The world needs it more than anything else!
@samvirtjk4901
@samvirtjk4901 5 лет назад
I am watching it after having IODINE pills...Safety first.
@justintjohn2508
@justintjohn2508 5 лет назад
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@prankcial4187
@prankcial4187 3 года назад
😂😂😂
@tatianatub
@tatianatub 9 лет назад
can you talk about thorium reactor's
@zeppie_
@zeppie_ 9 лет назад
ashley beaumont reactors* if you add an apostrophe, its a possessive, not plural
@linusorm
@linusorm 9 лет назад
BulletToTheKnee you're the Hero nobody deserve or want, but you're the hero we need. you are a...unitato.
@ImNoctica
@ImNoctica 9 лет назад
*plural.
@AustinPinheiro_uniquetexthere
@AustinPinheiro_uniquetexthere 9 лет назад
ashley beaumont im pretty sure they dont exist yet,
@animalxxv
@animalxxv 9 лет назад
ashley beaumont watch?v=568iDYn8pjc
@gersonboav1
@gersonboav1 5 лет назад
AMAZING EXPLANATION !! THANKS !
@derekonlinenow777
@derekonlinenow777 9 лет назад
Cool animations! Love'em.
@Maryam-xz7rp
@Maryam-xz7rp 9 лет назад
Do A video on depleted uranium
@projectmanagement2356
@projectmanagement2356 5 лет назад
He just did
@start3000
@start3000 9 лет назад
Interesting.
@michaeltalbot8242
@michaeltalbot8242 5 лет назад
Excellent thanks a very well presented presentation on a complex subject
@ConservativeMan59
@ConservativeMan59 Год назад
Great job explaining!
@bencapps5509
@bencapps5509 5 лет назад
Nuclear reactors are awesome and we need more of them
@giselarenner7007
@giselarenner7007 Год назад
No we don't thay are scarie and can end the world poeple should not mess around with nuclear trust me!
@bencapps5509
@bencapps5509 Год назад
@@giselarenner7007 hey, look another ignorant person that has no idea what they're talking about
@PaddyMacNasty
@PaddyMacNasty 9 лет назад
Is it really all that more efficient when you take into account the energy spent refining it? Genuine question.
@MUSTASCH1O
@MUSTASCH1O 9 лет назад
***** It isn't stable energy though. The extra cost of energy storage makes them more expensive at the moment, although they are an essential part of the energy mix. Nuclear can produce more energy but it can't change to demand well so it is best for providing base energy consumption.
@MUSTASCH1O
@MUSTASCH1O 9 лет назад
***** For £2 billion you could build a 1200 MW nuclear power plant, for the same price you could install about 1150 MW of wind turbines so the difference is not much, but this means it is important that we use both energy sources (in the UK). I would guess that factoring in energy storage for wind and decommissioning costs for nuclear both still cost similar prices, at least by the time we have adequate methods for storing all that wind energy. Surely you must know that wind turbines aren't extremely constant in their output though. Even out at sea the wind doesn't blow forever. "Extremely constant" is an overstatement. There are upsides and downsides to both technologies that I haven't included here but I will say that we can't rely on renewables yet, and we can't solely rely on nuclear either.
@danuk500
@danuk500 9 лет назад
***** It'd be interesting if you could show us your sources? I'm rather doubtful at how you are saying wind turbines are almost just as good as nuclear power plants.
@MUSTASCH1O
@MUSTASCH1O 9 лет назад
***** I can't exactly remember where I looked for the figures but I know it was a combination of looking at pricing figures from a manufacturer's website, some stuff on Wikipedia, and I'm pretty sure I just looked for the cost of the Heysham 2 construction. I don't think I included the cost overruns that often happen on new reactor design builds or the cost of the storage requirements needed for that much wind power either. It's just a rough estimate tbh. My point is more that they are both viable energy sources but neither is a magic bullet.
@myinfo3406
@myinfo3406 6 лет назад
i was thinking the same thing
@martijnvangorp
@martijnvangorp 3 года назад
Great explanation! Thx!
@fi773l
@fi773l 9 лет назад
Thanks for the info and great job adding the cartoons for us visual learners.
@Merecir
@Merecir 9 лет назад
The final energy output of 1 ton of Thorium ore in a LFTR equals about 235 tons of Uranium ore in a LWR. Assuming equal 3% purity of the ore the waste from the LFTR will be about 2.1 kg while the waste from the LWR will be about 7 tons (6838 kg depleted uranium and 211.5 kg waste)... The 2.1 kg waste from the LFTR needs to be stored for only 300 years. The 211.5 kg waste from the LWR needs to be stored for 100.000 years. The worlds Energy (2007) Tonnes of Coal: 5 000 000 000 (five billion) Barrels of Oil: 31 000 000 000 (thirtyone billion) M^3 Natural gas: 5 000 000 000 000 m^3 (five trillion cubic meters) Tonnes of Uranium: 65 000 (sixty five thousand) ALL of this equals only 5000 tonnes of Thorium. Google LFTRs
@George_456
@George_456 5 лет назад
5000 tons of highly toxic waste every year doesnt sound good.
@nsoper19
@nsoper19 7 лет назад
what is the total energy footprint of creating usable nuclear fuel?
@jaxbingo9992
@jaxbingo9992 7 лет назад
very small. its almost as clean as the pipe dream energies (eg solar, water, wind)
@Merecir
@Merecir 7 лет назад
Depends on the type of fuel you want. Usable Uranium is pretty energy intense. Thorium is dirt cheap (literally (literally)).
@OsscarBones
@OsscarBones 9 лет назад
Loving the animation!
@DamianReloaded
@DamianReloaded 9 лет назад
I liked the way the information was presented in this video.
@lttexan
@lttexan 6 лет назад
Thanks for differentiating enrichment for civilian nuclear reactors as opposed to nuclear weapons. Too many people just assume that the nuclear reactor fuel can simply be "put in an atomic bomb."
@abrahamnightingale2267
@abrahamnightingale2267 6 лет назад
There is a third kind of nuclear reactor that is left out of this video. The thorium reactor, or the Molten Salt Reactor. It requires U-235 to get a reaction going but it doesn't require a fission to produce energy. It use thorium and the technology have been around since the 1950s but wasn't developed further because the fission reactor have a military application whereas thorium reactor doesn't.
@balaji4567
@balaji4567 9 лет назад
Simple and clear explanation about Uranium extraction and related process !!
@FrostyBrewBro
@FrostyBrewBro 9 лет назад
The animations look really good. I'd like to see more cuts with info shots
@dpallatin
@dpallatin 9 лет назад
I think nuclear engery is the smartest energy
@dariuso2657
@dariuso2657 9 лет назад
Nein!
@dariuso2657
@dariuso2657 9 лет назад
We need potato powered unicorn bioreactors!
@MegaBlueT
@MegaBlueT 9 лет назад
David Pallatin Thorium reactors anyone?
@cravenjooooooooooooo
@cravenjooooooooooooo 9 лет назад
MegaBlueT They need an other look.
@dariuso2657
@dariuso2657 9 лет назад
MegaBlueT If anything from nuclear, it has to be thorium and/or fusion.
@jrjon738
@jrjon738 5 лет назад
I think nuclear energy is feasible, and yes would definitely make a big impact on the cut down of fossil fuels! Even though I see that renewable energy is gaining grown, it still won't produce enough for the typical person, unless they live under a rock. Let's be real, everyone loves to have AC and everyone has to constantly use electricity for lights, computers, and washing clothes.
@pbennett13
@pbennett13 9 лет назад
thanks for this education.. much clearer than others I've watched
@frozeneternity93
@frozeneternity93 9 лет назад
The animations in this episode were great :)
@DOOM891
@DOOM891 9 лет назад
i would rather they invest in thorium reactors over uranium reactors for A: A LOT safer. and B: The Thorium reactors are aprox 200x more efficient than conventional uranium reactors, not to mention that thorium is way cheaper than uranium...
@MasterAsra
@MasterAsra 9 лет назад
DOOM89 I'm hoping for either Thorium or the Takomaks reactor in France to end up working perfectly.
@TopShot501st
@TopShot501st 9 лет назад
Its more conceptual than an actual solution.otherwise why dont you see thorium reactors poping up all over the world
@Pantograph_1
@Pantograph_1 9 лет назад
DOOM89 thorium also cannot be turned into weapons grade plutonium either
@TheDutchMitchell
@TheDutchMitchell 9 лет назад
TopShot501st Because thorium can't be used to make nuclear weapons with..sometimes things are that simple in this shitty world
@DOOM891
@DOOM891 9 лет назад
TopShot501st yes but the concept from what i've researched is astounding, china is charging ahead in research of thorium reactors because of the potential the technology has, way back in the 50s when reactors were in their 1st iterations there was a functional thorium reactor, the reason it wasn't chosen over the uranium breeder design was simply because the government of the u.s. wanted something they could get weapons from, simple as that. but for energy generation thorium is by far the best choice because its safe, clean and inexpensive.
@tejaswinjain
@tejaswinjain 5 лет назад
Nuclear and solar should be current focus Along with wind, tide, and geothermal energy.
@TopShot501st
@TopShot501st 5 лет назад
Nuclear is the boogyman so dont expect that to happen
@dbp1926
@dbp1926 7 лет назад
Great video so easily explained
@MrMartinBigger
@MrMartinBigger 9 лет назад
Nice animations!! Looking good!
@rileywindham
@rileywindham 5 лет назад
0:22 that’s a coal power plant....
@AzKam84
@AzKam84 9 лет назад
I was expecting to see green glowey stuff :-(
@ReviewMemeNSA
@ReviewMemeNSA 9 лет назад
azadkamall84 Why wuld u think u wuld be in a DNews vidoe?
@MattHoffmannn
@MattHoffmannn 9 лет назад
ReviewMemeNSA 0x00 Give back 200 pennies to massivegouda please, you thief.
@ReviewMemeNSA
@ReviewMemeNSA 9 лет назад
Matt Hoffman Idk if u understand how dis meme works m8, tahts my job
@choadatiostoad415
@choadatiostoad415 8 лет назад
blue glow from Cherenkov radiation electrons surpassing photons in water.
@xeddtech
@xeddtech 5 лет назад
Usually it's fluorescent blue from the cherenkov radiation. Quite beautiful.
@jlhougaard
@jlhougaard 5 лет назад
This is great editing
@dmh8953
@dmh8953 5 лет назад
Great video!
@ExplorationsASMR
@ExplorationsASMR 5 лет назад
Nuclear reactors do now use Highly Rnriched Uranium.(HEU). Uranium is low enriched. Coal burning plants actually release radiation into the environment. Nuclear power is highly efficient and part of our waste storage problem is due to the fact that we don't process the rods when removed. Approximately 80% of the material in the rods could be used again, but that process is not allowed by law here in the states. There are fatal flaws to every type of energy production. I know the thought of radiation is a scary topic to mist people, bit we live, work and play in radioactive environments every day and every place we go. I am not challenging you to support or not support nuclear energy, but please take time to learn about it before rendering a judgement or basing your decisions on misinformation from people who want to scare you into a position.
@castanza128
@castanza128 5 лет назад
Well, I don't know, but I've been told Uranium ore's worth more than gold Sold my Cad', I bought me a Jeep I've got that bug and I can't sleep
@maureennuthu2432
@maureennuthu2432 6 лет назад
wow thanks... well explained!!
@Ukitake13thDivision
@Ukitake13thDivision 9 лет назад
DNews I think nobody mentioned that: Awesome idea with the animations! Gonna check Life Noggin for sure!
@888life
@888life 5 лет назад
dude looks like a poor mans' Tim Olyphant
@Fallzvidz
@Fallzvidz 9 лет назад
Very interesting video. Suggestions: 1) What happens to nuclear waste? 2) How are nuclear weapons manufactured (in detail like this one)? 3) What was Tesla's idea of wireless tansmission of electrical energy? 4) How powerful is Scandinavia? ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ Sorry if some might already be done.
@dagamerking
@dagamerking 9 лет назад
I would be interested in learning about alternatives like thorium reactors, whats involved in the making of those?
@TheGreg6466
@TheGreg6466 9 лет назад
Waa good that, interesting and informative, thanks :)
@gatewaysolo104
@gatewaysolo104 5 лет назад
wow they flashed °F on the screen. **Europeans start convulsing at the sight**
@chapsie547
@chapsie547 9 лет назад
Hahaha, Kim Jong-Un is probably watching this in high hopes.
@p0k7lm
@p0k7lm 5 лет назад
Very good knowledge here , tnx !😃
@OmegaMegalodon
@OmegaMegalodon 9 лет назад
awesome informative video
@northbaseuk882
@northbaseuk882 5 лет назад
Or just build a nice RBMK reactor and do away with all that spinning nonesense.
@TroggyPK
@TroggyPK 5 лет назад
Communist fuel is always better... The more explisive veriety produces more power for less cost.
@Foodentertainment
@Foodentertainment 7 лет назад
my comment is just that... we all are digging our graves with our own hands :)
@kurtpatterson509
@kurtpatterson509 6 лет назад
Rana Moon Digging everyone's grave with a few hands. And if u don't participate in this brave new world u are labelled as backward and uncivilized. So forward go into forever night.
@RakeshPrasad1979
@RakeshPrasad1979 5 лет назад
Awesome!!
@TheLadyoftheday
@TheLadyoftheday 9 лет назад
Yay. Great way to start the day
@gouriprabhasiya3289
@gouriprabhasiya3289 3 года назад
Who's here who has not watched chernobyl but is here?
@joepeglegmorgan3015
@joepeglegmorgan3015 5 лет назад
I feel for Chernobyl
@Sweenus987
@Sweenus987 9 лет назад
A video on Uranium power plants vs Thorium ones would be awesome!!
@kamonrot
@kamonrot 9 лет назад
Graphic is awesome!!
@myselfbut590
@myselfbut590 5 лет назад
Don't wear Russian boxer shorts......Chernobyl fallout!!
@briancherry1
@briancherry1 5 лет назад
🤣
@2014andBeyonD
@2014andBeyonD 9 лет назад
You could also install solar panels to run batteries. Done.
@dariuso2657
@dariuso2657 9 лет назад
Good luck covering at least 10% of earth's surface for it to be of any good. :D
@andrewharbit7449
@andrewharbit7449 9 лет назад
Darius P you dnt have to cover 10% of the earth we concurve the light into a smaller stronger focal point, theres vids all over youtube check it out
@2014andBeyonD
@2014andBeyonD 9 лет назад
Darius P Your number is based on mid 70's technologie. Nowadays +/- 1% of the Sahara desert is enough to generate enough energy for the entire planet. 8% of Texas is enough to power all of the United States.
@andrewharbit7449
@andrewharbit7449 9 лет назад
And how do you plan on transmitting the power from these sunny locations?
@xanokothe
@xanokothe 9 лет назад
Andrew harbit Thanks Tesla for AC power + high tension (Voltage) is loss less way to transmitte energy from high distances
@eddyvillalobos2779
@eddyvillalobos2779 9 лет назад
I visited were they make videos, and its really cool I met them too it was a school trip.☺
@rusmir12345
@rusmir12345 5 лет назад
Very helpful stuff, Thanks mate, back to the lab 😊
Далее
Why Is It So Hard to Stop Meltdowns?
13:37
Просмотров 740 тыс.
Getting to the Good Stuff (Uranium Enrichment)
12:32
Просмотров 85 тыс.
How Molten Salt Reactors Could Revive Nuclear Power
19:21
This is the BOMB to worry about
11:04
Просмотров 11 млн
Why Is Desalination So Difficult?
20:32
Просмотров 2,9 млн
Is Thorium Our Energy Future? | Answers With Joe
16:59
Going Nuclear with Neil deGrasse Tyson
10:09
Просмотров 1,1 млн
REAL PLUTONIUM
16:45
Просмотров 11 млн
ВЫ ЧЕ СДЕЛАЛИ С iOS 18?
22:40
Просмотров 129 тыс.
iPhone 12 socket cleaning #fixit
0:30
Просмотров 43 млн
AI от Apple - ОБЪЯСНЯЕМ
24:19
Просмотров 126 тыс.
Face ID iPhone 14 Pro
0:59
Просмотров 22 тыс.