#FREE 🕊️ YOUR *HEART* 💔 and MEDITATIONS from the grips of your anger 😤 bitterness. The ANSWER to anyone & everyone is ALWAYS *LOVE* 💗 Don't fall victim to conspiracies 🐍 that stirs up division. Hate & violence & war is never the answer. Because the #TRUTH 💡 is that we are all brothers & sisters 🤗 Amen ✝️ BRUCE LEE 🐉 was asked if he considered himself Chinese or American. Do you know what his wise answer was?? (1971 interview) The world is ONLY trying to keep China *ACCOUNTABLE.* So am I 🙏 China broke 🙅♀️ their *promise* 🤝 of two systems in Hong Kong (1997-2047). Everyone _knows_ it 🌍 The whole world _sees_ it. 👁️👁️ Please China, don't lose face! 😔 TRUST is easy to lose, hard to build... If China was HONORING two systems in the first place, there WOULDN'T be any protests. There would be PEACE☮️! The Hong Kong people have 🗣 *cried* *out.* Now the world 😭 *cries* with HK. Please China, don't lose face. I love China 🙏 I want China to be a good character in the world community and show that they can keep their word [integrity]. I am Chinese ✞ Hong Kong was supposed to be a symbol of China's☀️bright future. Not a reflection of its past🔫(1989). Oppression 🤐 is never 🙊 stability... No country is perfect! *It's* *OK* *to* *criticize* *China* *where* *they* *are* *wrong.* *Please* *do...* That is why we have 🗣 *freedom of speech* 🗣. Chinese citizens are forced CCP propoganda 🐍. They have no other alternative than the CCP's narrative. Democracy doesn't want dictatorship. They have no election or voice 😔 #FREECHINA 🙏 and be GENUINE instead of fragile. *-XINJIANG-* Those who do 👿EVIL likes to hide 🤫🙊🤐 [censorship] Those who do 😇GOOD is not afraid for the world 🌍 to see 👁️👁️ [transparency] Darkness is scared of the light 🔦 (John 3:20✝️) 💡 Show us inside the camps?? 💡 Hear from the students?? *95% of the responses I get resort to insults 🤷 But insults only describes the person 👈 spewing it (Ecclesiastes 10:12✝️) I would love to talk to anyone, but let's be REAL please 🙇Czz
Xinjiang borders Afghanistan. Afghanistan is thousands of miles away from the US. Xinjiang is part of China. What did the US do to Afghanistan? A case of double standards? Let’s pause and think.
@@elbarca223 In 2018 Lawrence Wilkerson exposes the truth on US military intentions in central Asia as well as their use of Uyghur Chinese to "destabilize China". This is eye-opening and explains why the Western mainstream media can't stop pumping "Uyghur Genocide" disinfo. Watch 'US Col. exposes truth on Uyghur Chinese in 2 min'
@@eurasiaacaci.-110 YT does not allow links so you will need to search for the video 'US Col. exposes truth on Uyghur Chinese in 2 min - MSM doesn't want you to see this!' and you can watch this ... 'Listen to a Canadian's perspective on the truth of 'genocide' in Xinjiang' and you can get information on the fake 1 million number by searching for this grayzone article 'China detaining millions of Uyghurs? Serious problems with claims by US-backed NGO and far-right researcher ‘led by God’ against Beijing'
Absolutely, it is not just the victims who need to retaliate! The Western lies on Xinjiang must be condemned by anybody or country with self dignity or decency.
China should welcome the UN in all the education centers in Xijnang so the whole world can see what a harmonious society really looks like. Western lies cannot go unpunished!
@@RaviSingh-iv2nw You said nothing but just insinuate China is evil. Are you sure about this? Ahmed is in his rights to like... But, have you got any rights to insinuate that?
Do we need an American lead alliance to bring human rights accusations? Don't we have multilateral bodies that can do this? While they champion rules based orders they are breaking it themselves. If this isn't hypocrisy what is?
No this is not correct, the "untouchable" are just that which is the 5 permanent members of the UN security council, China is one of those countries so in reality whether it be the US or China the rules based order is voluntary.
United Snake of America is the biggest threat to the world. They set the Rules and Regulations for UN, WTO, WHO, World Bank, IMF, SWIFT, Open Skies Tready, Iran Nuclear Deal, Intermediate Missile Tready, etc, but who is the First country that Withdrew from WHO, Paris Climate Agreement, Iran Nuclear Deal, Intermediate Missile Tready?
@@YouCCP2 the UN was set up by many countries including China so don't know what you are talking about there. If the US truly did make the rules I can assure you that they wouldn't have made China and Russia as powerful as themselves with veto power.
@@annoyedaussie3942, when UN was set up in 1946, the "China" at that time was ruled by (KTM Taiwan) Chiang Kai Shek, he is a puppet of US. In 1972, Henry Kissinger and Nixon visited the _Communist_ China ruled by Mao. US needed China to counter Soviet Union, hence US established a formal diplomatic relationship with _Communist_ China. US loves _Communism_ and supported China in 1972, US loves China so much until _Communist_ China is accepted to the Permanent Security Council in the 1970's and kicked out Taiwan. About 48 years later, US condemn China, _Communist_ is bad, China _is_ bad So, why Communist was good during the last 48 years , but it is bad now? Reason is - US is too frightened and nervous to see the rise of China in such a short time. So, US has to do anything she could to block the rise of China, including bad mounting, stigmatise, accusations. That's why Trade War, Technology ban, HK riots, South China Sea, India-China border conflict,, Chinese Virus, Xinjiang Genocide, etc are the propaganda to stigmatise China. I am sure the more US put pressure on China, the faster China will progress. US ban China on ISS, block NASA scientists from working with China, ban military technologies, etc What are the results? China developed her own Tiangong space station, own space program to the far side of the moon, to Mars, own Beidu Navigation system, own fighter jets, destroyer, Aircraft carrier.... Let's see , how soon Huawei will have its own ecosystem to compete with Android.
@@MIKEDIAMONDZ Myanmar is self-inflicted internal affair, there many domestic inter-enthics interest contradicting others. Even ASEAN stay neutral on this.
@@MIKEDIAMONDZ what I see is China communism system far better than any so called democracy countries. And u really believe that democracy really 💯 perfect and fit every nation every countries ? One more thing.. do you really understand the meaning of democracy?
KILLING WANTONLY IS BETTER THAN RE EDUCATION CHINA REBUILD E OLD MOSQUES BUT PPLRE EDUCATION BELIEVE DESTRUCTIONS IS BETTER THAN RE EDUCATION. IS IT E REAL CHOICE IS TO KILL, KILL
EU stayed quiet when the US sanctioned the international criminal court judge's and their families for investigating possible war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. How can anyone take the US or EU seriously about human rights?
Do EU countries have the gut to do that? What about the genocide of the native Indian in US? They have decimated the native people into extinction. That is not genocide?
Its curious that the EU and USA aren't concerned about how the Palestinians are being treated. You wanna talk about disproportionate punishment...that is the single best example in the world right now
@@annoyedaussie3942 I agree too, see the problem here is that civilians from the West also agree. What the government of China is doing is wrong, just like what the Americans are doing is wrong, just like what the Israeli's are doing wrong. I don't want to be ruled by any of these governments. China is JUST as bad as the US and the EU, and most every day folks should wake up and fight back against them.
@@annoyedaussie3942 That's because you're an Aussie and have no idea what's happening in China.. Palestine supports China. Does Palestine support Israel? Basically all Islamic nations support China.. How many Islamic nations supports Australia? But go on you keep pretending you care about Muslims, you really fooling no one. It's so fake, the people who kill the most muslims and have destroyed most muslim nation are also the people who pretend to care most about Muslims, lol.... What's it like to be so fake?
@@MIKEDIAMONDZ Sounds good. Then wait for the US vaccine after it finish vaccination of 300M people or the India-made vaccine. Good luck! The 50% reliability is also baseless.
Hi, Victor, nice and happy to see you at Dialogue. Please keep up with the good and courageous spirit to fight against all the baseless and ruthless rumours of the Western medias and politicians! Thank you very much for speaking out loud and clear for China!
As of now, 155,000 children are kept in dilapidated conditions at the border. Where are the EU, UK, CA, AUS, NZ? The hypocrisy is appalling. They must be knocked off from their moral high ground.
@@anonnoone8500 Wow! I really appreciate your information very much. We must knock the heads of the hypocrites of the Western medias and politicians! I like your comments very much! Keep up with the righteous spirit!
@@autumnfar3114 My post on how these countries raised wars and created misery for tens of million people around the world got deleted twice by YT in the main thread.
Also: stop buying any H&M products. Quote: "the company had officially announced to stop using products from Northwest China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region."
Rule of law goes both way. What about participation in illigal war agaisnt Iraq? EU is silent on this issue. How about illigal war on Afganistan? How about illigally initiate regime change on so many countries resulted in countless suffering? That guy really talked nonsense!!!
Mybottlenise You are wrong : EU was NOT " silent " with regard to US war against Iraq.....EU had unanimously & strongly opposed this war.....so, pls try to get your information updated
Mister Wong, i presume you are a Chinese national !? If you want to come to a sollution about a problem, it doesnt help to ignore the different oppinion. One would say that these 5000 years of culture, should have brought you a more open mind !
Most people in the EU don't care about US powergames in Asia and know little to nothing about them. We have enough of our own problems that are systematically ignored.
Unfortunately US and British owed media ,banks and other finance sector controls mainland Europe, they wouldn't allow European people any decision making.
That's just another way of saying that China is beyond international law and isn't required to take responsibility for its actions, and, cares less about having international allies. Carry on, because this will unite countries against China based on China's approach (China is not beyond the consequences of its own behavior). Watch. See...
@@rodneyhenchliffe754 You may not know that US started trade war first and western media is creating an anti-China sentiment and US plus some scholars (e.g. Adrian Zenz) fabricated false stories similar to Nayirah testimony to create reasons for unilateral sanctions to dampen China’s chance to overcome US. It is important to see things outside your own interests and from others point of view.
@@Keiz1122 Thanks for telling me all of that. But let's not be naive here, and its simply not good enough to say "... the US started trade war first" without considering why or if that is even true. More specifically, The CCP shrewdly acquires others' research by co-opting Chinese nationals, paying foreign scientists to recreate research in the People's Republic of China (PRC), and sending military officers abroad as civilians to steal technology and information to advance the PRC's military and economic development goals. The estimated theft of American trade secrets by China costs the United States “anywhere from $300bn to $600bn” a year. From the American's point of view, The FBI data shows an aggressively stepped-up campaign by US authorities to root out Chinese espionage operations pursuing American secrets. All of this has been going on for decades now - I have even seen this for myself. Then China moans when the U.S. weaponizes the dollar to strategically benefit its own foreign affairs interests. I totally advocate looking at things with an 'open view' as a way of factoring in the different sides, however appreciate that I have mentioned just some of the stuff that has been going on. Ultimately though, you have to draw your line and decide where you actually stand ("for better or worse") - i.e. you cannot not act. Those who want you not to act or give criticism will just tell you ... "you have to consider at both sides. This is a trick. A trick to prevent you from drawing your lines and standing by them. And I totally draw my line with the CCP trying to push its vision of Globalization using Totalitarian means and methods. You say: "western media is creating an anti-China sentiment and US plus some scholars (e.g. Adrian Zenz) fabricated false stories similar to Nayirah testimony to create reasons for unilateral sanctions to dampen China’s chance to overcome US" I say: taking your own doctrine of looking at things from both sides, hasn't it occurred to you that China's CCP also controls information, and, thereby doing so generates its own anti-Western anti-American sentiment? Hasn't it occurred to you that China's own scholars are 'bent' along these same lines by order of the CCP? (i.e. as mentioned in detail above) Forget Adrian Zenz!!!!! His research was just the initial "alarm bell", and since then the Chinese authorities have responded woefully inadequately in the face of a lot more highly compelling evidence that clearly corroborates Zenez' claim about the 'forced participation' and human rights abuses by China being mentioned here. Do you honestly believe that individual countries have sanctioned China 'lightly'? Do you honestly think that the EU would simply let America just order it to move against China in this way at the present time? (The EU has just signed a trade agreement with China and has somewhat 'frosty' relations with the U.S. at this time). In other words, you also have to consider the Geo-political picture too!
Ms Zoon is articulate, fair and accurate in her responses while the Cleppe guy is just a western puppet with pre-programmed answers, not capable of expressing his own convictions.
Arcy0429 You are utterly wrong about Pieter Cleppe.....on the contrary, he was very articulate & expressed his opinions very intelligently. What you didn't like abt Mr Cleppe was the fact he robustly stated, without mincing his words, that the EU will no longer ratify the Trade & Investment agreement which China & the EU jointly signed last December 2020. It was the Chinese panelist ( mr Victor ? ) who was arrogantly & in a parrot- fashion, churning out CCP' s threatening & aggressive narrative.....he had been repeating a similar line of reasoning, on behalf of CCP, for more than a year ever since Trade War started between China & US ... He is a CCP stooge, a liar & a manipulator of truth par excellence........he is utterly bereft of objectivity and he has mastered the art of being a first rate propagandist & mouthpiece acting on behalf of CCP
@@rajnikantchande2677 Talk about IGNORANCE and ARROGANCE! Pieter has never been to China and based everything he says on the lies of Adrian Zenz, a SUPER FAKE China expert who has never been to China. You should help promote peace on earth by researching, learning the truth and not be part of the problem. Victor Gao is a very intelligent man! Stooge to no one! A patriot!
Komrade: Again I am telling you TO read history books. YOU ARE DEMONSTRATING TO THE WORLD HOW IGNORANT YOU ARE. THE BRITISH DIPLOMATIC MISSION TOOK PLACE IN 1793 and EUROPEAN UNION Started in 1 January 1973 . By the way CAN you point on the world map were Europe is???
@@Zerpentsa6598 UK doesn't need to sign trade deals with China.. It has already trade deal with Japan & the EU. An outline of Trade deal with India will be signed when Boris Johnson visits India in circa June this year. Trade deal with Canada & Australia will follow by year end... Trade deal with US is already being discussed with US counter parts. There will be no problem in signing deals with the Saudi & the UAE since UK has long standing frictionless trade relationship with these countries.....same goes for South Africa & Kenya....old trading partners. ...Trade deal with Nigeria is , I believe, in the pipeline. UK has already indicated keen interest in joining the Trans Pacific trading bloc whose ten members have welcomed UK's decision . So, you will now know that UK doesn't need to sign a deal with China. So, I think, you will understand that UK is indifferent to signing a deal with China. Btw, you can add South Korea to the above list for UK's potential trade deal..... If the UK was that desperate to sign a trade deal with China, it wouldn't have rejected Huawei to install UK's telecom infrastructure for 5G mobile communications. 3.4.21
I really wish the host could have given more talk time to the lady as I believe she has much more to offer. because some of the points she brought up is really helpful and better our understanding on the thought process of those politicians.
It’s truly amazing how many people by into the propaganda. Perhaps one day ! Maybe then the people in the CCP controlled mainland will have access to truth of what living under the CCP is really like. For all the accusations about how the US hates China , you really don’t understand them at all. The US does NOT hate the Chinese people. Now the CCP is totally different. They love the people in the free and independent country of Taiwan .
I think your guest Peter missed the whole point of EU sanctioning China. He is a bit naive to see through the double standard of US and the EU. These countries are still in the era of coloniasm .
Given the cosmetic nature of the sanctions, either the EU doesnt believe its own lies or the EU doesnt think much of Genocide and Mass Rape. Neither conclusion is good for the soul.
Double standard, what about the countries that did in the pass years of invading, killing, bombing. EU not sanction the countries who did it, how's the EU dealing the human rights?
Pieter C asserts that the EU is a democracy & is up for open debate & yet I don't see it offering the PRC any platform to contest these accusations. It's all very well saying the EU is democratic but on what basis are these democratic opinions formed? So far as I can tell, it's all based on one-sided allegations from individuals &/or bodies with anti-China agendas. Then to have the temerity to feel wronged by the PRC's response in kind to sanction certain people (a practice which I disagree with) following the EU's orchestrated sanction after meeting the their master, the US; so much so that they are threatening not to sign off on the trade agreement. If that is the case, so be it - it's more their loss than China's. As I've posted elsewhere, this should give China a chance to make use of the raw materials boycotted by the west to make their on finished quality products & sell under their own brands under their domestic market (dual circulation) & global south at low prices. The inflated prices of western brands only goes towards their P&L bottom line with no benefit to China in any case.
I have respect for the opinions of the lady (Zoon) as she is fair and accurate in her arguments regarding the topic being discussed. On the other hand I cannot say the same thing about the Pieter guy who is evidently pro-American and is just echoing and parroting the usual western opinions about China. This Pieter guy talks about "the rule of law" in the west. Does he think that there is no rule of law in China and that anyone from outside can say anything about China without hard evidence? It is discussion with people like him that will lead to nowhere, as he believes that the west is right and China is always wrong in spite of the lack of evidence to the contrary and the presence of abundant proof that Xinjiang is prospering under the rule of law by China.
As can be seen, China is well prepared for some time for these new attacks from the Imperial West as the counter-attacks are so swift. In quick succession, the joining of forces between China and Russia with the signing of a mutual protection agreement will be strong enough to withstand the US+NATO+QUAD
Remember that west sanctions on China before and after,, don’t write like a worrier here if you don’t know anything about history of economics in China,, when western sanctions on China at that time China was not even have metro but after western lift sanctions China start to develop, China alone cannot compet nato country in economy,, chines need more western countries then western need chines ,, today chines economy is very big but once nato country united then it will very problems for chines economy to grow more,, most of the asian country want to be with western countries then China,, even in Africa they need more to be with west then China ,, so it’s better for China to think smart then talking nonsense,, tit for tet is a not a smart move,,
@@lusterstar8164 I survive I don’t used anyway..everything is not only made in China . There is other country too that can make ,, you talk like only chines can make everything 🤣🤣
The Brussels guy attempted to blame China for reaction to the sanctions applied to her by US and EU. China is the victim. Mr. Victor Guo had the perfect reply to this blaming the victim attempt.
The rest of the world should not allow just 10 percent of the world population tell them what to do. It's time to group effectively and put these presumptuous people down.
The US and European businessmen want to do business in China. But the politicians, who were under control by certain groups, have to obey their Master!
Unfornateky this host has accepted the western narrative as a given, and the whole discussion revolved around the western story line as if the accusations were real. Victor Gao made it amply clear, this whole issue about Xinjiang is not about human rights, but about vicious lies and fabrications by the west on the reality of Xinjiang. This is where the focus of the discussion should have been.
The US has lost the trade war with China and will lose the number one position in a few years. The US strategy in promoting hatred, conflict and bullying is not working well and therefore trying to align with other western countries to stop China in becoming the number one. You have done a great job in this well balanced dialog. Unfortunately EU is being pulled into this conflict by the US. Like one of the speaker said both the EU and China will suffer as a result if the EU/China trade agreement falls through. The US is smiling at a distance and perhaps will come up with some trade deals with EU on the side. Nonetheless I am positive that the EU can see through all the US deceptions.
No point to debate when the westerners has closed their ears, the only one thing you could wake them up is to impose sanctions and embargo or worst punitive measures
22 Western Christian countries and Japan wrote a letter to the UN criticizing China´s Xinjiang “camps”, but 54 countries, most of them Muslim-majority states, defended China´s Xinjiang policies? What is wrong?
Over the past 40 years, the population of the Uyghur ethnic group in Xinjiang has increased from 5.5 million to 12.8 million, and the average life expectancy has increased from 30 to 72 years. The fact that Xinjiang residents of various ethnic groups enjoy stability, security, development and progress, makes it one of the most successful human rights stories. However, some politicians in the US, the UK, Canada and the EU clearly don't want to acknowledge this fact. They grabbed the so-called "evidence" maliciously fabricated by some anti-China politicians and scholars, even though the so-called "facts" are nothing but patchwork based on false "internal documents", "victim statements" and information from unknown sources. They have even taken out of context and distorted Chinese official documents and data. All this proves that it's never human rights and truth that they care about. They just do not want to see China's success, development and better livelihood. That's why they have been using human rights issues as a pretext for interfering in China's internal affairs and frustrate China's development. What they have done is utter denigration and offense to the reputation and dignity of the Chinese people, blatant interference of China's internal affairs, and grave violation of China's sovereignty and security interests.
China stands for survival of the constant perpetual law of the universe and the universal nature of humanity (ren 人). In the words of Dao de jing (道德經): What enables the rivers and the seas to be king over all the valleys is that they are good at staying lower than them (江海之所以為百谷王者,以其善下也 ). I love China and I see Xi Jinping as a man who deeply cares for not only Chinese but humanity
Allmost every international ethnicity crisis is a difficult to solve complex reality. Although highly sensitive communities have a desire to respond to these realities in appropriate manner. In early history the media filled this gap with their idealistic intentions and certain people knew how to use it in their own favor. This is changing due to new technology and communication abilities. China is the leader in technology and communication and is overthrown by realizing their effects on western civilization. For the two big western parts US and EU this can be a far too big game changer to predict their policy outcome. It's just a situation of denials that EU putting sanctions, just like the US is in.
Anytime an Asian country has risen, it never matters how much European/Anglo countries are divided they will always unite to keep the Asian man down. Whether it was in 1901 or 2021. This is purely racial and has nothing to do ideological differences.
I admire the lady panellist most. She is very insightful and righteous. She should have been given more airtime. I also agree that tnough China has to stand up for her dignity and confront lies about Xinjiang, China should not play into Biden's hand and get the CIA endangered.
Hypocrisy at grand scale, you invaded and bombed the Muslim countries killing innocent civilians, and you have the right to sanction and interfere with other country’s internal affairs? Look at yourselves, shameful!
I am very interested in this discussion. It is a nice panel. However, I really wish the host have some patience and letting the interviewee finish his sentences!!! What is the use of interviewing someone if you won't even open to hearing their full sentences! Hope CGTN improve their interviewing skills.
China had done more to its people in Xinjiang by raising better health, education, and tackled poverty. EU why not look at France action toward its muslim citizens.
A difficult conversation but ultimately productive. We can see where the EU guy disagrees with the Chinese, but the conversation continues to flow. The Pakistani girl provides a good middle ground with different and fresh perspective. More fruitful than most other discussion panels on other news shows.
Hi from New Zealand. I find myself in agreement on the Chinese view in regards to the Afganistan diaspora. / It has been seen - the virtual documentary of the activities of the western 'above govt foreign policy teamsters' in the Ukraine in 2014, so anything theyve said is guilty by association of that which is their main game. A new cold war can only exist if one side is on the aggressive, and that is not the Chinese position - Now or ever? And please do consider that maybe what China is doing . . . . . . . is living the American dream. China is being a success and acting successful, and thus this must be preceeded by the development of relationships. Russia, China population means the reality of whats happening is - with the others that would join with these ones in a common goal/ground alliance is, by definition a new much larger empire than the British or American footprint had ever been.
I'll just add that I think all will fall because of this new phenomenon that is the Blockchain. This method of logistics perspective does to politics what fuel injection did to engine power and the western legacy systems are just not compatible with it. 80% unfit for purpose.
This is proving international cooperation are just as difficult as in America or the EU countries, with so much ideology fights, lies, accusations, these countries could not move ahead within their borders and they are making it a mess on the international scenes too, China will grow stronger over time without these nations, leave the in fighting to consume themselves within their border, better do what's necessary for China and develop better relationship with others that deserve it!
