Quantum communication: Perhaps every atom has a fingerprint, that fingerprint may be based on its current state of time for that atom type, which may be 1 in a billion. When the first atom communicates its state, it send that state (frequency?) through all the atoms around it, until it gets to its partner. Since the partner is in the same state of time, it accepts that state and reacts accordingly.
Almost got it! Since everyone already knows that the electron is the only one who leaves the house (free electron), with his (guarks) luggage, and also includes his (here's the differentiation that disguises his "fingerprints" that you spoke) underwear, which helps (entropy) himself slither off in two (everyone knows that an atom can be in two places at the same time) directions. But, only (pay closer attention now) two (many, many, MANY) directions at the same (this is what causes multiples of times, or multivvereses, or parallel universes) t...(ready? This is the whole 8 yards, the 9th is free for you, and only you,) ...ime
show us something tangible. show us accurate weather forecast spanning a week with a comparison between the forecast and the actual weather, show us a 3d rendering in real time with GI, show us a quantum deepfake, show us .... something!
Did anybody think about one more quantum field like field of thoughts, or wishes.. i do not know how to formulate it correctly. Like electricity can make things move, or magnetic field can make things move - our wishes or thoughts also can make things move...
I'm not interested in "brainstorming" "quantum technology" a-la "robot butlers, flying cars and moon bases by 2000". I want to see a specific subject with VERY SPECIFIC answers discussed. There's a very good reason a non-negligible number of people think Kurzweil is an idiot...
fibers in an endoscope are replaced for ccd chips about 20 years ago so what Miles Padgett is dated. Endoscopes have a diameter of 3mm to 14 mm nowadays
Incomprehensive? Maybe they don't know what they are talking about. Quantum and magnetics. If you follow previous posts elsewhere. Photons (theoretical quantum particle) allow light to travel from point to point much the same as sound travels over air or in a pendulum kinetic energy travel from one point to another (The so-called duality of photon/light is false). Another theory is electrons isn't electricity, but allow electricity to travel from atom to atom. It's theorized metal may have more electrons then previously believed. How does it relate to magnetism? It's proposed that magnetic material have atoms with structure where electrons arrange themselves in natural coil pattern and have (wild theory) some kind of enclosed electrical loop. Somewhere a while back, theory got confused with proven fact. You might find to strange to find periodic table and the diagram of atom as being theoretical and may not entirely accurate. Real world of atom is it's building blocks clump together like dirt. Quantum computing, totally fake.
Photons aren't theoretical, they are what light is made from. They behave as point like particles when measured, but waves otherwise (wave particle duality). Magnetism arises due a property of electrons called spin. Macroscopic arrangement of spins of the electrons causes magnetism m all this is measured in the lab. You don't need to say anything when u don't have a proper background.
I don't know why I find that funny. But I do. For you to ask him if he owns a dog house. Can you please explain that to me I'm a little on the slow end. Keith
Wouldn't Quantum technology actually put All Humans in a Virtual Reality game called Life☆☆☆iT would be profound not to think so? Because what calls us Human, isn't Human at all☆
Classical computers can do that. Quantum computers are actually slower than classical computers it's just that you square the number as you add qubits so they can run a multitude of computations at the same time to arrive at the answer in minutes instead of yrs or for some problems till the end of the universe with a classical computer. The implication are staggering.
Well they talked about how the quantum revolution would change our life early mid 80's so apparently it simply do not scale or the whole idea is flawed.
That's because u don't follow the incremental progress in this field. Just type: intel or Google or Microsoft or Honeywell or IBM followed by the word 'quantum' in Google. After this, there are many more smaller companies making progress, in hardware and in software.
@@quantumpolariton122 Well IBM took interest in quantum computing already in the middle 80's some half century ago. The things do not work the things do not scale the thing are just probalistic distributions, if you program a reduced bettingtips system you effectively built a quantum computer bwhahaha nah those guys are going nowhere since the 80's it is just a buisness/scam to lure in investors and funds for universities. I think it is the epipheny of hype its been for some 50 years. Quantum computing LoL
@@quantumpolariton122 It's just some fancy math dressed in exotic clothing, works just as wall emulated on a binary computer. You could build some fuzz logic to simulte it, better up build a real trinary electronic system.
